XI Curso Nacional de Atualização em Pneumologia Tratamento da Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática 16/04/2010 Prof. Dr. José Antônio Baddini Martinez Professor Associado – FMRP-USP Conflito de Interesse Nenhum conflito de interesse a declarar, relacionado com o conteúdo da presente exposição. Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática Sobrevida mediana entre 3 e 4 anos I II III IV (King TE et al., AJRCCM, 164: 1171-81, 2001) (Ries LAG et al. SEER Survival Monograph. NIH Publication: 07-6215, 2007) Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática Tratamento Convencional • Estudo retrospectivo, aberto • Dois centros médicos • Pareamento por função pulmonar inicial • Sem tratamento X Pred. + Ciclo. (n=82) (n=82) (Collard HR et al. Chest 2004; 125: 2169-74) Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática Tratamentos Investigados DROGAS ALVOS Imunomodulação Endotelina HP DROGAS Etarnecept Zileuton Octreotida TTmolibdato GC-1008 FG-3019 Cobre Interferon Talidomida HP Imunomodulação Angiogênese Minociclina Gleevec Angiogênese PDGF QAX576 BIBF 120 IL-13 Enzimas Interferon Bosentana Iloprost Sildenafil ALVOS TNF- 5 LIPO Somatostatina TGF- CTGF N-acetilcísteina • Produção de GSH • Antioxidante intracelular p=0.02 p=0.003 NAC: menor toxidade hematológica Mortalidade em 1 ano: NAC: 9% X Placebo: 11% Pirfenidona • Droga com ação anti-fibrótica. • Mecanismos de ação desconhecido. • Ação anti-TNF-, anti-TGF-, anti-oxidante ? (9 meses) Pirfenidona e Prednisona Placebo e Prednisona p n 73 36 - CV (L) -0,03 ± 0,22 -0,13 ± 0,19 0,037 SaO2 0,46 ± 3,99 -1,59 ± 3,40 0,031 Exacerbações Agudas 0 5 (14%) 0,003 (Azuma A et al. AJRCCM 2005; 171: 1040-7) Eur Respir J 2010; 35:821-829 Pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis H. Taniguchi1, M. Ebina2, Y. Kondoh1, T. Ogura3, A. Azuma4, M. Suga5, Y. Taguchi6, H. Takahashi7, K. Nakata8, A. Sato9, M. Takeuchi10, G. Raghu11, S. Kudoh4, T. Nukiwa2 and the Pirfenidone Clinical Study Group in Japan12 A multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase III clinical trial was conducted in Japanese patients with well-defined IPF to determine the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone, a novel antifibrotic oral agent, over 52 weeks. Of 275 patients randomised (high-dose, 1,800 mg·day–1; low-dose, 1,200 mg·day–1; or placebo groups in the ratio 2:1:2), 267 patients were evaluated for the efficacy of pirfenidone. Prior to unblinding, the primary end-point was revised; the change in vital capacity (VC) was assessed at week 52. Secondary end-points included the progression-free survival (PFS) time. Significant differences were observed in VC decline (primary end-point) between the placebo group (-0.16 L) and the high-dose group (-0.09 L) (p = 0.0416); differences between the two groups (p = 0.0280) were also observed in the PFS (the secondary end-point). Although photosensitivity, a well-established side-effect of pirfenidone, was the major adverse event in this study, it was mild in severity in most of the patients. Pirespa® - Shionogi Company Capacity Studies - InterMune Inc. • Grupo não representativo: não fumantes e abordados durante internação hospitalar. • Só 9 com biópsias pulmonares. • Inclusão de vidro despolido como critério tomográfico. • Intervenção não cega. • Taxa de abandono da anticoagulação: 26% FPI e Anticoagulação • Assunto em aberto. • Ensaio clínico do NIH em planejamento. Exacerbações Agudas (Collard HR et al. AJRCCM 2007; 176: 636-643) • Metil-prednisolona: 0,5 a 1,0 gr/dia por 3 dias. • Anticoagulação ? • Ciclosporina ?? • Largo espectro antibiótico + pulsoterapia ??? Respirology (2008) 13, 394-399 Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis OSAMU NISHIYAMA, 1 YASUHIRO KONDOH, 1 TOMOKI KIMURA, 1 KEISUKE KATO, 1 KENSUKE KATAOKA, 1 TOMOYA OGAWA, 2 FUMIKO WATANABE, 2 SHINICHI ARIZONO, 2 KOICHI NISHIMURA 3 AND HIROYUKI TANIGUCHI 1 Results: Assessment of efficacy was carried out on 13 patients who completed the programme and 15 patients in the control group. There were no significant effects of the programme on measures of pulmonary function, values of arterial blood gas analysis or dyspnoea rating. Although there were some differences in the baseline 6MWD and total health-related quality of life score which were not statistically significant, marked improvements were observed in the 6MWD (mean difference 46.3 m (95% CI: 8.3–84.4), P < 0.05) and the total health-related quality of life score (−6.1 (95% CI: −11.7 to −0.5), P < 0.05). Transplante Pulmonar • Condições psicológica e social adequadas. • Sem co-morbidades significativas. • Idade < 65 anos. • CVF < 50-60%. • DLCO < 40%. • SaO2 < 88% no TC-6m. • Uso de oxigenoterapia contínua. • Baixa qualidade de vida.