MULTICENTRIC TRIALS Nise Yamaguchi MD, PhD Health Minister Representative – São Paulo State Source: World Bank Brazil General Data • Population, total (millions): 192 – Urban 80%; Rural 20% • Surface area (sq. mi, million): 3.3 • GNI (current US$, billions): 1,309.2 • GNI per capita, (current US$): 7,350 • Brazilian Economy – Services 52%; Industry 35%, Agriculture 13% NHS is an important component for national development, not an extra expenditure: The heath sector has become a core component of industrial dynamics and a driver of innovation. Brazilian Trade Balance in the health sector has been US$ 7 billions negative annually (medicines, immunobiologicals). R&D can dramatically reduce external dependence, growing the economy while distributing income. Brazil is among the largest world producers of vaccines, pharmaceuticals and immunobiologicals; CHALLENGES – THE BRAZILIAN HEALTH Mortalidade Proporcional no Brasil, 1930 - 2005 Transição Epidemiológica 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Infecciosas e parasitárias Neoplasias Causas externas Aparelho circulatório * Até 1970, os dados referem-se apenas às capitais Fonte Barbosa da Silva e cols. In: Rouquairol & Almeida Filho: Epidemiologia & Saúde, 2003 pp. 293. Outras doenças CHALLENGES – THE BRAZILIAN HEALTH Infant Mortality Rate. Brazil and regions, 1990 - 2007 Brazilian Goal for 2015: 15,7 deaths per 1000 alive Newborns 100 90 Taxa por 1000 NV Infant Mortality 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Brasil Norte Nordeste Sudeste Sul Centro-Oeste Source: CGIAE/DASIS/SVS/MS MIX: cálculo da mortalidade infantil utilizando metodologia RIPSA, que combina dados diretos do SIM/SINASC dos estados com boa qualidade (ES, SP, RJ, PR, SC, RS, MS e DF), com estimativas dos estados com baixa qualidade. SERVICE IN THE SUS+Unified Health System • 64 mil establishments registered with SUS • More than 70% of the population uses only the SUS • 130 million vaccines applied/year • 188 thousand patients per year with access to antiretroviral therapy • 2,3 billion outpatient procedures / year • 11,3 million hospitalizations per year • 254 million medical visits per year INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX of HEALTH • A new look at health: development, generating wealth and jobs. • Using the purchasing power of the State • Support for the expansion of productive capacity • R&D in the strategic agenda of health • Network technology to support industries • 300 million USD in buying capacity per year • 8 new projects with drug and devices companies total 250 million USD per year INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX of HEALTH • The size of the national dimension • Existence in Brazil of a tradition of production (the most developed in Latin America) • Universal health care: a large public demand • Scientific infrastructure and human resources • A well-structured regulatory system health organized on a national basis • Macroeconomic stability (investment grade) • GDP growth (annual): 25% • Reduction of income disparities (major impact on the market) • Industrial Complex Priority in national politics. INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX OF HEALTH • PPPs (April 2009): nine partnerships among seven pulbic labs and ten private companies for the production of 24 drugs • A self sufficiency path in Vaccines production: in five years the federal government investment raised more than 1200 %, up to R$ 21,06 millions in 2008. • Mission to the Great Britain in September 2009 and agreement for the production by GSK of Pneumococcal vaccines INVESTIGATING CLINICAL TRIAL COSTS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRIAL COST COMPONENTS IN KEY GEOGRAPHIES Market Research News , March 2011 Process flow and calendar days among stakeholders for one phase III cooperative group trial. Dilts D M et al. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:5381-5389 ©2010 by American Association for Cancer Research Phase III Clinical Trial Development: A Process of Chutes and Ladders Dilts DM et al, Clin Cancer Res Nov 15, 2010 Process steps, potential loops, and number of stakeholders involved in activating and opening a phase III cooperative group trial Cooperative groups* CTEP and CIRB Cancer centers* Total Process steps† ≥458 ≥216 ≥95 ≥769 Working steps† ≥399 ≥179 ≥73 ≥651 Decision points 59 37 22 118 Potential loops 26 15 8 49 No. of stakeholders involved 11 14 11 36 Investigator’s costs • ~200 hours per subject • Thirty-two percent of the hours were devoted to nonclinical activities, such as institutional review board submission and completion of clinical reporting forms. • ~6000 US$ per patient • ~2000 US$ for non clinical purposes Phase III multicentric trials-NCI • 2.5 years from formal concept review to study opening. Time to activation at one group ranged from 435 to 1,604 days, and time to open at one cancer center ranged from 21 to 836 days. • At centers, group trials are significantly more likely to have zero accruals (38.8%) than nongroup trials (20.6%; P < 0.0001). Emerging Markets • rapid recruitment of treatment naive patients from large patient pool • cost benefits associated with lower labour and service fees • improved transparency and compliance with international regulations • expansion of CROs • improved hospital and facilities infrastructure • huge future commercial value in emerging trial markets. CLINICAL RESEARCH IN BRAZIL CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES Brazil as a big player • VERY WELL TRAINED TEAMS • PHYSICIANS, RESEARCH NURSES, STUDY COORDINATORS • MANY PATIENTS OF DIFFERENT DISEASES • AN ACTIVE REGULATORY BODY • MARKET SHARE OF IMPORTANT PRODUCTS Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa registrados pelo Sistema CEP-CONEP 106 – Nordeste 2-RR 37 – Norte 3-AP 11-AM 21-CE 4-MA 13-PA 5-RN 12-PB 5-PI 2-AC 4-TO 6-RO 32-BA 4-MT 21-PE 4-AL 2-SE 12-DF CONEP 15-GO 39 – Centro Oeste 4-MS 69-MG 15-ES 162-SP 305 – Sudeste 59-RJ 34-PR 24-SC 51-RS Total: 596CEP´s 109 – Sul Fonte: CONEP/CNS/MS Agosto de 201 Evolução dos CEP/ANO QUATIDADE DE CEPs CREDENCIADOS NO ANO QUATIDADE DE CEPs CANCELADOS NO ANO Nº TOTAL DE CEPs ATIVOS NA CONEP/ANO Nº TOTAL DE CEPs ATIVOS NO SISNEP/ANO 1996 ------------------- ----------------- ------------------ -------------- 1997 83 ----------------- 83 -------------- 1998 45 ----------------- 128 -------------- 1999 35 1 162 -------------- 2000 34 1 195 -------------- 2001 44 4 235 9 2002 38 4 269 7 2003 78 29 318 13 2004 89 25 382 141 2005 101 29 454 92 2006 83 10 527 64 2007 47 1 573 41 2008 34 9 598 29 2009 23 20 599 18 2010 20 24 596 15 TOTAIS 754 (**) 157(*) 596(*) 429 (*) ANO (**) Número total de CEPs registrados pela CONEP desde 1996 até agosto de 2010. (*) Dados estatísticos de 1996 até agosto de 2010 Fonte: CONEP/CNS/MS Agosto de 2010 THE UNIVERSE OF CLINICAL RESEARCH AT THE CRB-BRAZIL • In the majority of cases: international research with international cooperation, with samples’ shipping to be studied abroad; phase III • Equipments, devices and reagents, either new or still non registered in the country • 46% Clinical Research (more than 400 submissions in total, every year) DIFFICULTIES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH • DELAY OF THE REQUIRED PROCESS: PROTECTION OF THE SUBJECT OF RESEARCH • INTERPRETATION BIAS • SHIPMENT OF SAMPLES ABROAD • EDUCATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE SYSTEM • COLLABORATION AMONG INSTITUTIONS Traditional Site Feasibility Process • • • • • • Incomplete study & budget info Not getting specific enrollment projections Not allowing time for proper assessment Requesting Free feasibility assessments Not leveraging investigator database Not explaining site selection criteria In-Depth Feasibility Questionnaires • • • • Synopsis / Protocol Recruitment number &timelines Budget Legal requirements FEASIBILITY • AS INVESTIGATOR, DO YOU BELIEVE AT THIS DESIGN OF CLINICAL TRIAL? • YOUR COMMITMENT TO THE STUDY • THE AMOUNT OF TIME AND WORKLOAD YOU WILL DEDICATE TO THE STUDY • YOUR CENTER RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT FEASIBILITY • DISEASE PREVALENCE • NUMBER OF PATIENTS AND TIMELINES • POTENTIAL STAKEHOLDERS • ACCRUAL METHODOLOGY CLINICAL RESEARCH AT THE PUBLIC SYSTEM • • • • NEW REGULATIONS BUDGET ALLOCATION PROFILE OF THE REGIONAL CENTERS POSSIBILITIES FOR INFRASTRUCTURE AND ALL STEPS OF CLINICAL RESEARCH • DISEASES AND SITUATIONS OF INTEREST FOR THE PUBLIC SYSTEM Brazilian Network of Clinical Research • Health Ministery Department of Science and Technology (DECIT) and the Science and Technology Ministery- Agencies for Research and Innovation • Calls for diseases prevalent in the public system • Opportunities and challenges 19 Centers Resources for Research • Different states have agencies for research, mostly in basic research • Innovation departments • Public and Private Partnerships • Academic development • Donnations • Sponsors • International Collaboration Plannification of costs not covered • • • • • • Organization of the site Different sources of money University or Hospital based Infrastructure covered by the institution? Needs and Assessments Planning is essential THANK YOU!