III WORLD FORUM
SCIENCE AND DEMOCRACY
 
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT, SOCIAL
PARTICIPATION AND CONTROL IN
DEVELOPENT OF NANOTECHNOLOGY
2001-2011: EXPERIENCE OF BRAZILIAN
RESEARCH NETWORK IN NANOTECHNOLOGY,
ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIETY - RENANOSOMA.
  PAULO
R, MARTINS
  COORDINATOR - RENANOSOMA
  TUNIS, MARCH 23/25 ,2013
RENANOSOMA
EDGARD MORIN (1)
§  “THE SPACESHIP EARTH IS MOVED BY FOUR MOTORS
AND AT THE SAME TIME, UNCONTROLLED:
SCIENCE, TECHNIQUE, INDUSTRY AND CAPITALISM
(PROFIT)
§  THE PROBLEM IS CREATING A CONTROL OVER THESE
ENGINES: THE POWERS OF SCIENCE, TECHNIQUE, AND
INDUSTRY MUST BE CONTROLLED BY ETHICS THAT
CAN ONLY IMPOSE ITS CONTROL BY THE POLICY
1- MORIN, EDGARD. POR UMA GLOBLALIZAÇÃO PLURAL. FOLHA
DE SÃO PAULO DOMIMGO, 31/3/02, P.A16
BRAZILIAN
REDEMOCRATIZATION
PROCESS
§  FITHING AGAINST MILITARY GOVERN
§  WORKERS PARtY
§  1982 CAMPAIN FOR DIRECT ELECTION FOR
PRESIDENT
§  1983 CUT TRADE UNION
§  1985 UNDIRECT PRESIDENT ELECTION
§  1985 LAUNCHED SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND
INNOVATION MINISTRY
§  MST – LANDLESS MOVEMENT
§  1988 BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTION
§  1999 FIRST DIRECT BRAZILIAN PRESIDENT
ELETCTION
BRAZILIAN
REDEMOCRATIZATION
PROCESS
§  1986 LAUNCHED MST – LANDLESS
MOVEMENT
§  1988 BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTION
§  1989 FIRST BRAZILIAN DIRECT ELECTION
FOR PRESIDENT
§  1992 IMPEACHMENT BRAZILIAN
PRESIDENT FERNANDO COLLOR
§  1994/2002 FHC GOVERN
§  2003/2010 LULA GOVERN
§  2011 – 2014 DILMA GOVERN
PUBLIC COMPETITION IN
NANOTECHNOLOGY WITH PUBLIC
MONEY
§  2001 4 NETWORKS
§  2005 10 NETWORS
§  2008 15 NATIONAL SCIENCE AND
TECNOLOGY INSTITUTE IN
NANOTECHNOLOGY
§  2009 16 SMALL NETWORKS
§  2011 12 SMALL NETWORKS IN
NANOTOXICOLOGY
MCT/CNPq calls for research
for these purposes
  1)increase
the scientific and
technological development;
  2)increase internatinal competivity
of Brazilian science, tecnology and
inivation;
  3) equally regional development;
  4) integration between public and
privite research centers and
companies
MCT/CNPq calls for research
for these purposes
5) Qualified job
6) Increase the
technological
7) Increase the
development.
creation;
Brasilian industry
level;
Brazilian economic
PRESIDENT LULA”S SPEECH
CAMPINAS , AUGUST 19 2005
OPENNING THE NANOSCIENCE AND
NANOTECHNOLOGY BRAZILIAN PROGRAMME
 
 
 
 
 
1) Brazil need export knowladge;
2) Technological innovation is the base for the
new Brazil that we want for the future;
3) Brazil is a n unequal coutry. At a same time
have places in first industrial revolution and
others in third industrial revolution;
4) Scientific comunity shoud be responsable for
the decisons of reseach
5) Science and Technology are essential tools
economic and social development and are
priority of federal govern;
PRESIDENT LULA”S SPEECH
CAMPINAS , AUGUST 19 2005
OPENNING THE NANOSCIENCE AND
NANOTECHNOLOGY BRAZILIAN PROGRAMME
6)The best investment is to put money in
Science , Technology and Education;
7)Need to increase the conection between
university and companie;
8) National Programme of Nanotechnology is
parte of Industrial, Technological and Trade
Policy.
9) Power = Scientific and Technical knowledge;
10)The best form to look for social justice.
RENANOSOMA ACTIVITIES
www.nanotecnologiadoavesso.org
 
 
 
 
 
LAUNCHED OCTOBER 2004 DURING THE I
SEMINANOSOMA WITH 12 RESEARCHERS
FROM ONLY HUMAN SCIENCE. TODAY 36
RESEARCHERS BELONGS TO RENANOSOMA
FROM HUMAN , NATURAL AND EXATS SCIENC
9 INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR
6 BOOKS PRINTED
4 DVD PRODUCED
2 COMICS PRINTED
RENANOSOMA ACTIVITIES
www.nanotecnologiadoavesso.org
 
 
 
 
 
 
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT IN NANOTECHNOLOGY
PROJET
VIRTUAL ACTIVIES
164 CHATS 2007/2008
190 PROGRAM “NANOTECHNOLOGY
INSIDEOUT” (2009 – 2013)
ALL TUESDAY 3PM TO 4PM SÃO PAULO TIME
www.iptv.usp.br
INFORM AND DISCUSS NANOTECHNOLOGY (IN
A PLURAL WAY) WITH THE NOT ESPECILIZED
PEOPLE
RENANOSOMA ACTIVITIES
www.nanotecnologiadoavesso.org
  PRESENTIAL
ACTIVIES
  AROND 150 CONFERENCES AND
DEBATES IN TRADE UNIOS,
SINDICATES, NGOS, SCHOOL,
UNIVERSITIES, CONSUMERS
DEFENSE, PARLAMENT, GOVERN,
INDUSTRY ORGANIZATION,
SEMINARS, CONGRESS,
NANOPARTICAL AND MACROPOLICY
§  ISSUES TO BE PUNCTUATE IN A POLITICAL
DEBATE
§  WHAT ARE THE UTILITIES FROM THESE
NANOTECHNOLOGIES?
WHO WILL BE THE OWN OR WILL BECOME
THE OWNOR?
WHO WILL THE RESPOSIBLE IF THE
THINGS GO WRONG ?
IN WHO WE CAN TRUST?
WHO WILL BE INCLUDED AND EXCLUDED?
Preliminary Conclusion of
Nanoscience and
Nanotechnology in Brazil
 
 
 
 
The roll of priority to development
nanotecnology in Brazil is a mirror from USA
and EU, so this is not against unequality.
There are no conections between development
nanotecnology, Brazilian biodiversity and fight
against unequality.
Scientific and Technological Development will
“naturaly” correct Brazilian unequalities.
Brazil can not loose this “historic opportunity”
to development the country by nanotechnology
Preliminary Conclusion of
Nanoscience and
Nanotechnology in Brazil
 
 
Only Scientific Comunity and State decide
about nanatechnology. There are not social
control or public participation in these
decisions.
Unequality is not subject for the Brazilian
Nanoscience and Nanotechnology develpment
to contibute for changing Brazilian Society
CONTACT
§  PAULO MARTINS [email protected]
§  www.nanotecnologiadoavesso.org
§  www.nanotecnologiadoavesso.blogspot.com
§  TV BY INTERNET PROGRAM
NANOTECHNOLOGY INSIDEOUT EVERY
TUESDAY 15H AS 16H SÃO PAULO TIME
§  WWW.IPTV.USP.BR
ResIST|Researching Inequality through
Science and Technology
Stakeholders’ Board Meeting, Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil
§  Nanoscience, Nanotecnology and
Inequality: The Brazilian Case
§ 
Dr. Paulo Roberto Martins
§ 
Coord Renanosoma
§ 
Reseacher at IPT
§ 
[email protected]
§  January 19 2007
2001
  CALL
CNPQ 01/2001
  4 NETWORS 2001/2005 - R$10 MILL
  MATERIALS NANOSTRUCTURATED
  NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY
  MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY
AND INTERFACES
  SEMICONDUCTORS AND
NANODEVICES
2003
 
Regulation MCT nº 252, de 16.05.2003
Work Group to produce the report
“Development in Nanoscience and
Nonotechnology”
Development Programme of
Nanoscience and Nanotecnology for the
Brazilian Federal Govern Plan 2004-2007
R$ 8.4 MILLION
 
Public Consult.
 
 
 
 
2004
  Regulation
MCT nº 614, 12/01/2004
  BRAZILNANO NETWORK
  Development Programme in
Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
  Industrial, Technological and Trade
Policy
2004
  CALL
CNPQ 12/04 13 PROJECT
  BIOTECHNOLOGY R$3.5 MILLION
  CALL CNPQ 13/04
5 PROJECT
  SOCIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND
ETHICAL IMPACTS R$125.000,00
2005
 
CALL MCT/CNPQ 29/2005
10 NETWORKS 2005/2009
R$12 MILLION
Simulation and Modelling of Nanostructure
NanoPhotonic
Nanobiostructure
Nanostructured coating
 
Microscopy /Probe (Varredura de Sondas)
 
 
 
 
 
 
2005
  Carbon
Nanotubes
  Nanoglucobiotechnology
  Molecular Nanotechnology and
Interfaces
  Nanobiomagnetism
  Nanocosmétic
2005
  CALL
MCT/CNPQ 28/2005
YONGS DOCTORS
  19 PROJECTS R$ 3 MILLION
  CALL MCT/CNPQ 58/2005
  INCUBATOR FOR NEW COMPANIES
  11 PROJECTS R$1 MILLION
INSTITUTOS NACIONAIS
DE
CIÊNCIA E TECNOLOGIA - 2008
INSTITUTOS NACIONAIS DE CIÊNCIA
E TECNOLOGIA EM
NANOTECNOLOGIA - 2008
INSTITUTOS NACIONAIS DE CIÊNCIA
E TECNOLOGIA EM
NANOTECNOLOGIA - 2008
COMITE INTERMINISTERIAL DE
NANOTECNOLOGIA
(PORTARIA 10/07/12)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I - da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (MCTI),
que o coordenará;
II - da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento
(MAPA);
III - da Defesa (MD);
IV - do Desenvolvimento, Indústria e Comércio
Exterior (MDIC);
V - da Educação (MEC);
VI - do Meio Ambiente (MMA);
VII - de Minas e Energia (MME); e
VIII - da Saúde (MS).
O NECESSÁRIO CONFRONTO
SOCIAL DESTE NOVA TECNOLOGIA
§  APRENDER COM O PASSADO : TRANSGÊNICOS;
§  ROMPER COM O CÍCLO EM TERMOS DE
PROPAGANDA, SEGREDO, FALTA DE
TRANSPARÊNCIA, MEDO E CONFLITO;
§  LEVAR EM CONSIDERAÇÃO DESDE O INÍCIO
PREOCUPAÇÕES SOCIAIS, AMBIENTAIS E ÉTICAS;
§  PARTICIPAÇÃO DO PÚBLICO NO PROCESSO DE
PRODUÇÃO E ADOÇÃO DESTA TECNOLOGIA;
NANOPARTÍCULAS E MACROPOLÍTICA
§  Como conduzir o debate publico sobre a nanotecnologia?
§  Extrair lições do evento “transgenicos’’.
§  Transparência desde o início da constituição do ‘Projeto
NanoBrasil’
§  Explicitar como aumentar a ‘inteligência social’ sobre
nanotecnologia e com isto enriquecer as tomadas de decisões
que levem visões e valores públicos
§  O debate deve permitir ao público formar e rever posições sobre a
nanotecnologia. Vários métodos que levam a este objetivo são
conhecidos
§  O debate deve informar a prioridade de pesquisa.
§  Revisão permanente em função do desenvolvimento da
nanotecnologia. Esta revisão deve levar em conta o debate
público precedente.
CAMINHANTE NÃO HÁ CAMINHO, O
CAMINHO SE FAZ AO CAMINHAR
ANTONIO MACHADO/POETA ESPANHOL
§  Devemos pois, superar a idéia de que a ciência e a
tecnologia é produzida pelos cientistas e deve ser
apresentada como um produto acabado ao público,
não restando a este outra coisa que não seja aceitar o
fato consumado.
Ciência e Sociedade devem
caminhar juntas, lado a lado, para indicar o caminho
que a tecnologia deve seguir, em que as decisões
sobre as pesquisas sejam abertas a apreciações e
debates, e que pressupostos possam ser alterados
desde o início dos trabalhos de pesquisa. Somente
desta forma e que poderemos contar com o
engajamento do público e, com isto, os resultados das
pesquisas não serão objetos de conflito com
a
sociedade.