ROTEIRO DE RECUPERAÇÃO DE INGLÊS INTERMEDIÁRIO - 3a Série - 2o SEMESTRE - 2015 Nome: _________________________Nº_____ 3a. Série __ Data: / /2015 Professores: Priscila / Cláudio Nota: _____ (valor: 1,0/2,0) 2º semestre A - Introdução Neste semestre, você não assimilou os conteúdos mínimos necessários. Agora, você terá a oportunidade de recuperar esses conteúdos por meio de um roteiro de estudo. Leia, atentamente, este roteiro, pois ele resgata conteúdos essenciais para o prosseguimento de seus estudos no segundo bimestre. B - Conteúdos essenciais do TERCEIRO BIMESTRE: No 3º bimestre deste ano, os conteúdos essenciais de nossa disciplina foram: CONDITIONAL SENTENCES DEGREES OF COMPARISON GENITIVE CASE/ FALSE COGNATES QUESTION TAGS/ AGREEMENT AND DISAGREEMENT RELATIVE PRONOUNS ALSO/TOO/EITHER AND EACH/EVERY/ALL ADJECTIVES WH-WORDS C - Conteúdos essenciais do QUARTO BIMESTRE: No 4º bimestre deste ano, os conteúdos essenciais de nossa disciplina foram: EASILY CONFUSED WORDS ADVERBS PASSIVE VOICE REPORTED SPEECH PHRASAL VERBS PREPOSITIONS PLURAL/EXPRESSIONS OF QUANTITY D - Objetivos de aprendizagem (conceituais e procedimentais/habilidades): 1 Além dos conteúdos essenciais, citados anteriormente, no decorrer do 1º semestre tínhamos como objetivos de aprendizagem: o Interpretação de textos variados com perguntas dissertativas e de múltipla escolha. o Utilizar apropriadamente o vocabulário estudado nas unidades 1 a 15; E - Orientações de estudo (atividades que têm como objetivo diagnosticar os erros dos alunos para que eles possam superá-los e, consequentemente, consigam atingir uma aprendizagem satisfatória): Agora, leia com bastante atenção as propostas de trabalho apresentadas a seguir, pois elas propõem uma retomada da trajetória de seus estudos semestrais e, assim, possibilitarão que você recupere sua aprendizagem e, consequentemente, sua média. É importante ressaltar que você precisará de muito empenho e dedicação na elaboração destas atividades, mas não estará sozinho nessa jornada porque terá o constante apoio de seu professor e também do monitor da área. Não se esqueça de que a meta geral de todos os seus professores neste ano é o fortalecimento da postura de estudante. E. Etapas e atividades Veja quais são as atividades que fazem parte do processo de recuperação: a) refazer as provas mensais e bimestrais para identificar as dificuldades encontradas e aproveitar os momentos propostos para esclarecer as dúvidas com o professor ou monitor da disciplina. b) refazer os exercícios do livro ou caderno. c) revisar as atividades realizadas em aula, bem como as anotações que você fez no caderno. d) fazer os exercícios do roteiro de recuperação. 2 F. Postura de estudante – Organização do material Reveja suas anotações de aula. Você conseguiu garantir os registros mínimos de cada conteúdo? Reflita sobre isso e, se necessário, complete suas anotações e anexe-as ao final deste roteiro. Reflexões sobre os estudos Quais as principais dificuldades que você percebe em seus estudos? Nunca Às vezes Muitas vezes Sempre Distraio-me com facilidade Esqueço-me rapidamente do que li Desisto de continuar a estudar quando não compreendo o que leio ou faço 0 1 Quando tenho que estudar um texto, primeiramente faço uma leitura do começo ao fim Depois de fazer uma primeira leitura do texto, tento identificar as ideias principais de cada parágrafo Sublinho as partes 3 2 3 4 mais importantes dos textos que leio Anoto as dúvidas para pedir ajuda Faço resumos, esquemas ou mapas conceituais do texto que li Como vou estudar? Respostas que ajudam pouco Respostas que ajudam muito Ler o livro e as anotações de aula de - fazer resumos; Inglês - pedir ajuda ao professor; - pedir ajuda ao monitor; - rever as correções de exercícios; - reorganizar minhas anotações; - copiar a matéria que perdi quando faltei; - estudar com meus colegas após as aulas. Dificuldades na avaliação (percepção do aluno) Interpretação Compreensão Produção Erros ortográficos dos das de textos documentos perguntas e Conteúdo Não houve dificuldade relevante respostas Dificuldades na avaliação (percepção do professor) 4 Interpretação Compreensão Produção Erros ortográficos dos das de textos documentos perguntas e Conteúdo Não houve dificuldade relevante respostas Trabalho de Recuperação Laughter is the Best Medicine Humor is infectious. The sound of roaring laughter is far more contagious than any cough, sigh, or sneeze. When laughter is shared, it binds people together and increases happiness and intimacy. In addition to the domino effect of joy and amusement, laughter also triggers healthy physical changes in the body. Humor and laughter strengthen your immune system, boost your energy, diminish pain, and protect you from the damaging effects of stress. Best of all, this priceless medicine is fun, free, and easy to use. (Adaptado de http://www.helpguide.org/life/humor_laughter_health.htm. Acesso em 21/08/2010.) 1.(UNICAMP-2011) O texto considera o riso mais contagioso do que outras manifestações físicas. Indique duas dessas outras manifestações. 2.(UNICAMP-2011)Explicite os efeitos positivos do bom humor e do riso para a saúde física das pessoas. 5 Did Charles Darwin Delay in Publishing Origins of Species? Charles Robert Darwin (1809-1882) began working on his theories of the Origins of Species in 1837; however his works were published more than twenty years after that. There is much speculation as to why it took so long to publish the groundbreaking book; some suggest that he was afraid to challenge the scientific community and upset the Church. After first positing his ideas regarding how species underwent a ―natural selection‖ and could possibly adapt over time, the text provoked adverted reactions from his intellectual mentors, Charles Lyell and Sir John Herschel. Still, Darwin continued working on his theory; if he really was affected by the potential of a negative response to his ideas, some believe that it seems more plausible that he would have abandoned research completely. Throughout the period during which he was working on the Origins of Species, he published essays revealing his work in progress. Many now believe that Darwin did not delay publishing, but rather, took over two decades to complete his work. (Adaptado de http://www.suite101.com/greatthinkers/4. Acesso em 21/09/2010.) 3.(UNICAMP-2011) Que hipótese é levantada por algumas pessoas para justificar o fato de Darwin ter demorado mais de duas décadas para publicar Origins of Species? 4.(UNICAMP-2011) Indique duas evidências que contrariam essa hipótese. SPY VS. SPY Last month, Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the United States was charging members of the Chinese military with economic espionage. Stealing trade secrets from American companies, he said, enabled China to ―illegally sabotage‖ foreign 6 competitors and propel its own companies to ―success in the international marketplace.‖ The United States certainly understands China’s behavior, because that’s pretty much how we got our start as a manufacturing power, too. For example, throughout the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, American industrial spies searched the British Isles, looking not only for new machines but also for skilled workers who could run and maintain those machines. One of these workers was Samuel Slater, often called ―the father of the American industrial revolution.‖ He emigrated to the U.S. in 1789, bringing with him an intimate knowledge of the Arkwright spinning frames that had transformed textile production in England, and he set up the first waterpowered textile mill in the U.S. Two decades later, the American businessman Francis Cabot Lowell talked his way into a number of British mills, and memorized the plans to the Cartwright power loom. When he returned home, he built his own improved version of the loom. Then, by making it part of the first integrated textile factory in America, he became the most successful industrialist of his time. The American government often encouraged such piracy. Alexander Hamilton, in his 1791 ―Report on Manufactures,‖ called on the country to reward those who brought us ―improvements and secrets of extraordinary value‖ from elsewhere. State governments financed the importation of smuggled machines. And although federal patents were supposed to be granted only to people who came up with original inventions, in practice, Americans were receiving patents for technology pirated from abroad. Piracy was a big deal even in those days. Great Britain had strict laws against the export of machines, and banned skilled workers from emigrating. Workers who violated the ban could lose their property and be convicted of treason. The efforts of Thomas Digges, America’s most effective industrial spy, got him repeatedly jailed by the Brits—and praised by George Washington for his ―activity and zeal.‖ These days, of course, things have changed. The United States is the world’s biggest advocate for enforcing strong intellectual-property rules, which it insists are necessary for economic growth. Yet, as our own history suggests, the economic impact of technology piracy isn’t straightforward. On the one hand, patents and trade secrets can provide an incentive for people to innovate. If you realized that a new invention was going to be stolen by China, you might not invest the time and money needed to come up with it in the first place. On the other hand, patents and trade secrets limit the diffusion of new technology— and sometimes slow down technological progress—while copying accelerates it. 7 Samsung, for instance, is known for being a ―fast follower‖ in its consumer business, which really means that it’s adept at copying other companies’ good ideas. That’s not the same as theft, but evidence from its recent patent trials with Apple shows that Samsung’s response to the iPhone was, in large part, simply to do it ―like the iPhone.‖ This was bad for Apple’s profits, but it meant that many more people ended up enjoying the benefits of Apple’s concepts. (–James Surowiecki Adapted from The New Yorker, June 9 & 16, 2014) 5.(FGV-2014) (to be answered in Portuguese) (This question tests your understanding of the text, as well as your ability to identify and paraphrase the relevant pieces of information. You should write approximately 120 words.) The article begins by mentioning a recent U.S.-China economic-espionage incident. In your own words, tell what happened and how the U.S. government reacted. What does the author think about the U.S. government’s attitude in this specific case and what examples does he give in the article to support his point of view? Regarding this U.S.-China matter, in your opinion, is the author’s position sensible and well formulated or equivocal and unconvincing? In answering, you may take into account legal, ethical, and practical considerations. 6.(FGV-2014 -adapted) (to be answered in Portuguese) (This question tests your ability to express yourself in a manner that is clear, precise, and relevant. You should write approximately 120 words.) In 1876, in what many Brazilians consider an act of ―bio-piracy,‖ the English adventurer Sir Henry Alexander Wickham smuggled around 70,000 rubber-tree seeds out of the Amazon region and delivered them to the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London. The resultant seedlings [mudas] were then cultivated in Ceylon (Sri Lanka), Malaysia, Africa, Batavia, and other tropical locations. Sir Henry’s economic espionage caused Brazil to 8 lose its monopoly on rubber production; the Amazon region – especially the city of Manaus – fell into a decline from which it has never fully recovered. Although the loss of its rubber monopoly was harmful to Brazil, in what ways may the world have benefited from the dispersal of rubber production? Do such benefits justify Sir Henry’s action? Did Brazil have the right to hold such a monopoly? In answering, you should consider rubber’s global military and industrial importance. Moreover, even knowing that espionage of any kind is illegal, would you encourage Brazil’s current government to practice vigorous economic espionage? In other words, if important advantages could be gained, should Brazil, in its condition as a developing country, engage in such a practice against any other country, no matter how rich or poor, friendly or unfriendly? THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE By Jeffrey Toobin Before Harry Blackmun became a federal judge, and then a Supreme Court Justice, he was the general counsel at the Mayo Clinic, the celebrated medical center in Minnesota. There he developed a reverence for doctors, which was reflected in his judicial opinions, especially in Roe v. Wade. In that decision, which was handed down forty years ago this week, the Court ruled that states must allow a woman to obtain an abortion during the first trimester of a pregnancy. According to Blackmun's majority opinion, the ruling fell under the right to privacy that is implicit in the Constitution. In keeping with his predilection for his former colleagues, he emphasized the rights not of women but of doctors: ―The attending physician, in consultation with his patient, is free to determine, without regulation by the State, that, in his medical judgment, the patient’s pregnancy should be terminated.‖ The word ―physician‖ appears in Roe v. Wade forty-eight times, the word ―woman‖ forty-four times. As the Court returned to the subject of abortion in subsequent decades, the rationale for its decisions shifted. In the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the court reaffirmed Roe in an opinion written jointly by Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy, and David Souter. That decision focussed on the provision of the Fourteenth Amendment 9 which says that no state shall ―deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.‖ The Justices said that a woman's decision to terminate a pregnancy was within the "realm of personal liberty which the government may not enter." More recently, in a dissenting opinion, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by three other Justices, offered still another constitutional justification for a woman’s right to choose, under a different part of the Fourteenth Amendment: the equal-protection clause. Undue restrictions on the right to abortion, Ginsburg wrote, violate ―a woman’s autonomy to determine her life's course, and thus to enjoy equal citizenship stature.‖ This sort of evolution is not unusual in the history of the Supreme Court. Some Justices like to assert, or pretend, that the Constitution has a single meaning, and that each case thus has only one correct resolution. This view is especially pronounced among conservatives, who, in recent years, have claimed that they can identify the original intent of the framers and use their eighteenthcentury wisdom to resolve any modern controversy. But, of course, interpretations of the Constitution have changed over time: legal theories pass in and out of fashion, and, most important, Presidents can and do change the understanding of the Constitution by naming new Justices to the bench. (There have been twelve since 1973.) That is the real lesson of abortion rights in the Supreme Court. Politicians, especially Presidents, lead. Judges, even Justices, follow. It’s tempting to be outraged by the close correlation between the outcome of Presidential elections and the outcome of cases before the Supreme Court. Aren’t Justices supposed to be independent of politics – isn’t that one reason they have life tenure? Aren’t judges different from politicians? Not really, and that’s nobody’s fault; when it comes to interpreting the majestic generalities of the Constitution, there is no such thing as apolitical decision-making. So, in a time of great polarization between the parties, Democratic and Republican judicial appointees see the world, and the law, in very different ways. (Adapted from The New Yorker, January 28, 2013) 7.(FGV-2013) (to be answered in Portuguese) (This question tests your understanding of the text, as well as your ability to identify and paraphrase the relevant pieces of information. You should write approximately 120 words.) 10 Though abortion has been legal in the United States for more than 40 years, it remains a controversial issue. (Essentially, liberals, who tend to be members of the Democratic Party, favor the continued legality of abortion, whereas conservatives, who tend to be members of the Republican Party, would like to see abortion prohibited.) So, in your own words, identify the three pro-abortion opinions presented in the passage and discuss the logic on which they are based. Explain why you think these opinions are fair and well formulated or weak and unconvincing. In answering, you may take into account the factors that can influence a Supreme Court decision. 8.(FGV-2013-adapted) (to be answered in Portuguese) A great Brazilian criminal-defense attorney once said: ―I’m not in favor of abortion, because I don’t think any decent man would be in favor of such a thing. I'm just not against it.‖ With that idea in mind, and considering the information in the passage, can you conceive of a situation in which you would not be against allowing a woman to have an abortion? Is abortion always wrong, or are there occasions when, in your opinion, it is admissible? Keeping in mind Brazil’s constitutionally mandated separation of Church and State, can you debate abortion without resorting to religious arguments? In other words, can the prohibition or legalization of abortion be based on logic and ethics alone? Give reasons and examples (from the passage and from your own knowledge and experience) to support your point of view. 9.(Mackenzie) Indicate the alternative that best completes the following sentence. ―If you had taken my advice, you ___________________________________.‖ a. would learned the lesson. b. would have learnt the lesson. c. should learned the lesson. d. would learn the lesson. e. should understand the lesson. 11 10. Complete with the passive voice. ―When_____________?‖ ―In 1928.‖ a. penicillin was discovered b. did penicillin discovered c. was penicillin discovered d. did penicillin discover e. discovered was penicillin. 12