Arup Infraestrutura & Transaction Advice Data: Junho 2015 1 Sobre a Arup Está entre as maiores e mais bem sucedidas empresass multinacionais em consultoria de infraestrutura Mais de 11.000 colaboradores trabalhando em mais de 38 países 60 anos de experiência em projetos de engenharia adquiridos em uma série de projetos ao redor do mundo Receita anual aproximada de US$ 1.5 bilhões Diversidade de serviços oferecidos aos clientes: planejamento, gerenciamento de projetos e projetos multidiciplinares em engenharia, com oferta de competências especializadas e aconselhamento estratégico Trabalhamos em todas as áreas do ambiente construído 2 Sobre a Arup St. Petersburg Dublin, Cork, Galway & Limerick Amsterdam Berlin Düssendorf London & UK offices Seatle Boston Chicago Washington DC Krakow Wroclaw Buchareste Belgrade Istanbul Rome Ankara Frankfurt Milan Toronto San Francisco Moscow Warsaw NY & New Jerssey Madrid Beijing Los Angeles Chongqing Huston Doha Wuhan Mumbai Hyderabad Manila Ho Chi Minh City Penang Kuala Lumpur Kota Kinabalu Brunel Singapore Bulawayo São Paulo Harare Calms Port Louis Gaborone Johannesburg Cape Town 3 Shanghai Bangkok Abuja Lagos Tokyo Shenzhen Taipei Gangzhou Hong Kong Macau Dubai Abu Dhabi Rio de Janeiro Seoul Tianjin Polokwane Sunshine Coast Brisbane Durban East London Port Elizabeth Perth Adelaide Melbourne Sydney Auckland A Arup no Brasil Atua no Brasil desde 1990, estabelecendo-se localmente em 2012 Escritórios em São Paulo e Rio de Janeiro Expertise global com presença local Mais de 60 profissionais especializados entre engenheiros, arquitetos, designers e consultores Currículo local com grandes projetos: olímpicos, prediais, consultorias em sustentabilidade, infraestrutura, entre muitos outros Museu do Amanhã, Rio de Janeiro 4 We shape a better world Disciplinas no Brasil Rodovias, Ferrovias, Aeroportos, Portos e Infraestrutura em geral Consultoria Fachadas (Caixilharia) Geotecnia e Fundações Estudos de Energia e Fachadas em Edificações Transaction Advice Estruturas Gerenciamento e Coordenação de Projetos Instalações (Ar condicionado, Elétrica, Hidráulica, Incêndio, etc) Planejamento Urbano Sustentabilidade Comissionamento Certificações LEED, Aqua, etc Edificações Infraestrutura 5 We shape a better world Planejamento Urbano Projetos no Brasil 6 Parque da Cidade, São Paulo Museu do Amanhã, Rio de Janeiro Carrefour Nações Unidas, São Paulo Centro Cultural Luz, São Paulo Trump Towers, Rio de Janeiro Halliburton Macaé, Rio de Janeiro Rio 2016 Parque Olímpico, Rio de Janeiro Porto Maravilha II, Rio de Janeiro RIO 2016 Velodromo, Rio de Janeiro Hotel Four Seasons, São Paulo Valongo Santos, São Paulo Linha 4 Metro, São Paulo Expansao SP-255/258, São Paulo Aeroporto Intern. Guarulhos, São Paulo Rio 2016 Halls de Treinamento, RJ We shape a better world Infraestrutura 7 Qualificações em Infraestrutura Mais de 40 anos de experiência no setor, atuando em todas as fases do projeto, desde o planejamento até a construção Variada gama de serviços de engenharia: projetos de transporte (rodoviário, ferroviário, aeroviário e portuário) Desenvolvimento de soluções integradas, internamente ou em parceria Projetos que reúnem muitas habilidades e serviços: geotecnia, drenagem, pontes e túneis, transporte ferroviário, mineração e projetos de rodovias Duplicação da SP-258, São Paulo 8 We shape a better world Qualificações em Infraestrutura Disciplinas Técnicas 9 Topografia Pavimentação Paisagismo / Urbanização Geometria Estudos Geológicos Sinalização e Dispositivos de Segurança Drenagem Estudos Geotécnicos Iluminação Terraplenagem Obras-de-Arte Especiais e Correntes (tuneis, pontes viadutos, estruturas especiais de drenagem) We shape a better world Projetos em Infraestrutura Duplicação da SP-258, São Paulo Rio Metro Linha 4, Rio de Janeiro 4ª Faixa na Rodovia SP-348, SP Duplicação BR-376, Tibagí - PR São Paulo Paraná Aeroporto Intern. de Guarulhos, SP APM Faixa adicional SP-255/258, SP 10 We shape a better world Rio de Janeiro Duplicação BR-277, Cascavel - PR Transaction Advice 11 Serviços em Transaction Advice Integração de habilidades Técnicas e Financeiras para ajudar a desbloquear o valor dos ativos de infraestrutura. Serviços: Due Diligence Técnica Consultoria Independente Strategy and Economics 12 125 32 US$100bi Fechamentos financeiros desde 2008 Países onde negócios foram fechados, desde 2008 Em investimento agregado desde 2008 Qualificações em Transaction Advice Due Diligência técnica para diferentes setores de infraestrutura. Habilidades e Experiência Financeira Técnica Identificamos oportunidades de desempenho ao lado de uma avaliação comercial dos principais riscos e incertezas. Retorno em investimentos Mitigacão de riscos Escopo de atividades: Operacional Comercial Etapa de Empréstimo Ponte Etapa de Empréstimo de Longo Prazo Etapa de Monitoramento (pós-fechamento financeiro) 13 We shape a better world Projetos em Transaction Advice Linha 4 do Metrô SP Linha 6 do Metrô SP Rodovia BR 163 Mato Grosso Aeroporto Intern. Rio de Janeiro São Paulo Rio de Janeiro Paraná Rodovias SP101, SP300 e SP Desenvolvimento de Licitações PPPs (Prosperity Funds) em Infraestrutura para o Gov. Estado de São Paulo 14 We shape a better world Rodovia PR 323 Clientes no Brasil Infraestrutura Transaction Advice 15 We shape a better world Clientes no Brasil Edificações e Planejamento Urbano 16 We shape a better world Arup London transport infrastructure: plans and funding models Alexander Jan, City Economics June 2015 Source: GLA GREATERLONDONAUTHORITY Source: Arup; GLA 6 7 Source: Arup Major schemes transport - London’s share, 2016-2050 DRAFT •World City schemes - £85bn cycling, river crossings, Garden Bridge schemes, roads • Radial links • £5bn (extension of existing tube lines and light rail) • Heathrow new town •Thames Estuary Airport - £46bn (over 15 years, 2020 and 2034) •Crossrail 1, 2 & 3 - £67bn (£16bn every 15 years) •National Rail enhancements - £16bn (15% of NR enhancements per control period) •HS2 - £13.5bn (50% of phase 1) - Redevelopment of Old Oak Common & Euston) 8 • £3bn (new stations; light rail system; bus system) • Orbital links • £3bn (includes Overground extensions and light rail) These schemes total some £238.5 billion—representing 66% of projected transport enhancement capex between 2016 and 2050 Projected Capital Expenditure for London to 2050 – H, M, L scenarios Estimated gap: £135 billion (housing and transport only) 9 Source: Arup Delivery models for transport in London • London Underground – OM&R – largely in house (city government TfL and its subsidiaries) plus outsourcing. New projects “traditional” D&B. Followed on from failed PPP model… • London bus services – private sector provision with contracting out of services. Some ownership of newer assets (hybrid buses) by TfL (authority) – in turn provided to operators • Commuter and intercity rail services – central government with private sector franchises/leased rolling stock assets. De facto govt infrastructure owner (Network Rail) with regulator. TfL increasingly involved in running city services • Trams – was PFI – bought out by TfL in 2008 – operated by private sector under contract • Roads – publicly owned and operated. Some contracted out services including Congestion Charge • • HS1 – Concession to private sector, maintained by Network Rail, international services privatised (UK share) domestic services franchised DLR – PFI/PPP but largely bought out by TfL in 2011. Private sector O&M 10 Paying for Crossrail Core funding (c£15bn) comprising: DfT grant (£5bn) Owners of sites above stations developing sites for re-sale City of London Corporation contributed and guaranteed at least £250m London Business Rate Supplement (£4.1bn) Other TfL (£3.2bn) NR debt (guaranteed) (£2.3bn) Plus additional BAA financial contribution of £230m Canary Wharf Group paid £150m towards construction of its station funding (right) 11 Berkeley Homes funding “box” (>£25m) for Woolwich station GREATERLONDONAUTHORITY Source: GLA Conclusions • Private-sector participation can take a range of forms – operations, maintenance, renewals, new projects – all have advantages and some drawbacks • Private finance for infrastructure cam sometimes prove expensive – can the state can finance more costeffectively? • There needs to be availability of public funding and there need to be strong controls to avoid “rentseeking” behaviour by the private sector • PPP models may impose disciplines on all parties that will drive efficiency and value for money but they can also be complicated and expensive to administer and amend • The public will expect to see train and bus services operate – if they do not, they will routinely blame politicians – irrespective of who is to blame. You cannot “outsource” accountability for the basic functioning of a city…. “The railway has to run”. • • “Coalitions” to pay for infrastructure can make it harder for schemes to be cancelled… Decisions as to how and what to fund are ultimately political and require strong local leadership and expertise to manage private sector partners…. 13 Further reading… • http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/business-economy/vision-and-strategy/infrastructure-plan2050 • http://www.nao.org.uk/report/the-completion-and-sale-of-high-speed-1/ • http://www.nao.org.uk/report/crossrail-3/ • http://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/UK-Guarantees-scheme-for-infrastructure.pdf 1 Channel Tunnel Rail Link now known as High Speed 1 Delivering a railway infrastructure UK success story IAN GARDNER Director, Ove Arup & Partners Area 100 Project Manager RLE St Pancras & Kings Cross Lands The High Speed Objective Brussels The Arup Route St Pancras The Right Line… ... It had four unique advantages: - It could potentially bring huge regeneration benefits to the blighted areas through which it would run, - It facilitated high speed rail to the north of London, - It freed up capacity on the heavily congested South-East network, and - Most of the route did not involve upgrading existing railways. ... A fundable proposition ... For public benefit Kings Cross Rail Lands – derelict central London site large scale mixed use regeneration Stratford, East London – derelict inner city mixed use regeneration and London 2012 Olympics Possible future rail connectivity to the north and west St Pancras London Ebbsfleet, Kent Thameside brownfield site urban/residential regeneration Improved connectivity to facilitate regeneration of eastern Kent EBBSFLEET 1992 Arup Route CTRL Project Statistics 108 km of new 300kph high speed train system • 3 major tunnels (28km) • 4 international stations • 2 major viaducts • 144 bridges • 1.5m trees planted • 14m cm cuttings & embankments • OLE 25-0-25kV AC power HS1 Railway to the Channel Tunnel 108km new railway, built in two phases, commenced in 2000 and opened in 2007 CTRL Section 2 CTRL Section 1 35km of new twin-track with 19km in tunnels 74km of new twin-track (Opened in 2003) St Pancras London EBBSFLEET CTRL Section 1 – New railway through Kent Civil Engineering, Tunnelling, Earthworks, Drainage Bridges and Structures Highways, Cuttings, Environmental Mitigation Land Decontamination, Earthworks, Regeneration Stations, Depot, Rail Systems, Electrification St Pancras Station & Kings Cross Lands £3bn mixed use development Up to 30,000 jobs 250 new businesses 490,000sqm of new office and retail 1,800 new homes New station square creates ‘address’ for redevelopment CTRL work at St Pancras linked with London Underground regeneration Main entrance relocation benefits Kings Cross station Kings Cross Western Concourse, London, UK Central London urban regeneration facilitated by CTRL St Pancras Station Euston Road Kings Cross Central Kings Cross Station 1km Regents Canal Kings Cross Lands An urban monument regenerated