Ministry of the Environment
Priority Areas for the Conservation,
Sustainable Use and
Benefit Sharing of Brazilian Biological Diversity
Secretary of
Biodiversity and Forests
Ministry of
the Environment
PRIORITY AREAS FOR THE CONSERVATION, SUSTAINABLE USE
AND BENEFIT SHARING OF BRAZILIAN BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
UPDATE: MMA Administrative Ruling n° 9, of 23 January 2007
1
Federative Republic of Brazil
President
LUIZ INÁCIO LULA DA SILVA
Vice-President
JOSÉ ALENCAR GOMES DA SILVA
Ministry for the Environment
Minister
MARINA SILVA
Executive Secretary
JOÃO PAULO RIBEIRO CAPOBIANCO
National Secretariat of Biodiversity and Forests
MARIA CECÍLIA WEY DE BRITO
Director of the Department of Biodiversity Conservation
BRAULIO FERREIRA DE SOUZA DIAS
2
Ministry of the Environment
National Secretariat of Biodiversity and Forests
Department of Biodiversity Conservation
PRIORITY AREAS FOR THE CONSERVATION, SUSTAINABLE USE
AND BENEFIT SHARING OF BRAZILIAN BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
UPDATE: MMA Administrative Ruling n° 9, of 23 January 2007
BIODIVERSITY 31
Brasília
2007
3
PRIORITY AREAS FOR THE CONSERVATION, SUSTAINABLE USE AND BENEFIT SHARING OF
BRAZILIAN BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. UPDATE: MMA Administrative Ruling N° 9, of 23 January
2007.
Technical Coordination
Marcos Reis Rosa
Biome Coordinators
Amazon Protected Areas Program: Ronaldo Weigand Jr.; Cerrado and Pantanal Nucleus: Mauro
Oliveira Pires; Caatinga Nucleus: Antônio Edson Guimarães Farias; Atlantic Forest and Pampas
Advisory and Planning Nucleus: Wigold B. Schaffer; Coastal and Marine Zone Nucleus: Ana Paula
Prates.
Technical Biome Coordinators
Amazon: Ana Luisa Albernaz; Cerrado and Pantanal: Paula Hanna Valdujo; Caatinga: Manuella
Andrade de Souza; Atlantic Forest and Pampas: Leandro Baumgarten; Coastal and Marine Zone: Luis
Henrique de Lima.
Information consolidation
Marcos Reis Rosa
Technical Revision
Helio Jorge da Cunha
Translation
Agnes L. Velloso
Cover, Design and Editing
Mayko Miranda Daniel A. Miranda e Marcelo Rodrigues S. Sousa
Bibliographical Standardization
Cilulia Maury
Photos kindly provided by
Carlos Terrana, F.S.E. Santo, Leandro Baumgarten, Maria Carolina Hazin, Miguel Von Behr, and
Vinícius Lubanbo
Support
United Nations Development Program – UNDP - Project BRA/00/021
Ministry of the Environment– MMA
Luís Eduardo Magalhães Information, Environment Documentation, and Editing Center – Environmental CID
Esplanada dos Ministérios – Bloco B – térreo
Brasília/DF
70068 900
Email. [email protected]
www.mma.gov.br
Printed in Brazil
4
Foreword
The Convention on Biological Diversity – CBD, signed in 1992, represents a
global effort for maintaining biodiversity and faces the challenge of developing
directives to conciliate economical development with the conservation and sustainable
use of biological resources.
Brazil, as Party to the CBD, is committed to support actions that provide the
government and society with the information needed for establishing priorities that lead
to the conservation, sustainable use, and sharing of benefits from the Brazilian
biological diversity.
One of the major challenges to the decision-makers on biodiversity conservation
is to establish national, regional, and local priorities, which are fundamental to
transform political decisions into concrete actions, with the efficient use of the available
financial resources.
Therefore, the Ministry of the Environment carried out, between 1998 and 2000,
the first “Assessment and Identification of Priority Areas and Actions for the
Conservation of Brazilian Biomes”. At the end of that process, 900 areas priority were
delimited, established by Decree no 5092, of 24 May 2004, and instituted by MMA
Administrative Ruling no 126, of 27 May 2004 (both attached to this publication). The
Administrative Ruling determines that these priority areas should be periodically
revised at intervals no longer than ten years, to reflect knowledge gains and changes in
environmental conditions.
It is with satisfaction that we now present the updated Priority Areas, revised
with a methodology that incorporates the principles of the Systematic Planning for
Conservation tool and its basic criteria (representativeness, resilience and vulnerability),
and favors participatory negotiation and consensus building processes. A larger number
of sectors and groups connected to environmental issues was involved, providing
legitimacy to the process, which considered the various interests to produce these
results.
These updated Priority Areas, instituted by MMA Administrative Ruling nº 09,
of 23 January 2007, will be useful for guiding public policies, something that is already
occurring, for example, in the licensing procedures for ventures; in the bidding
processes of concessions for oil extraction by the National Oil Agency – ANP, guiding
research and studies on biodiversity (bidding processes of the Project on the
Conservation and Sustainable Use of Brazilian Biological Diversity – PROBIO/MMA,
and of the National Environment Fund – FNMA/MMA); and in the definition of areas
for creating new federal and state protected areas. It should be noted that this is a new
tool that is still in the process of being integrated in the various governmental and
society sectors, and its use should gradually increase.
We believe that using these updated Priority Areas as a basis for guiding public
policy will contribute to achieving the desired acceleration of the country’s economical
growth in a way that is compatible with the conservation of our biological resources,
their sustainable use, and the sharing of benefits derived from their use.
Marina Silva
Minister for the Environment
5
Introductory Remarks
Between 1998 and 2000 the Project on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of
Brazilian Biological Diversity – PROBIO/MMA conducted broad consultation for
defining the Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use, and Sharing of
Benefits from the Biodiversity in the Amazon, Cerrado and Pantanal, Caatinga, Atlantic
Forest and Pampas, and in the Coastal and Marine Zone. This project allowed not only
the identification of priority areas, but also the assessment of the socio-economical
conditionalities and trends of human occupancy of the Brazilian territory, in addition to
listing the main actions for managing our biological resources.
New biological information became available since these areas were first
defined, as a response to the demand created by Decree n° 5092 of 21 May 2004 (annex
11.1) and by MMA Administrative Ruling nº 126 of 27 May 2004 (annex 11.2) which,
while instituting these priority areas, foresee their revision according to the advance of
knowledge. Updating the Priority Areas is also in agreement with the strategies
suggested by the Convention on Biological Diversity – CBD, by PAN-Bio – Directives
and Priorities of the Action Plan for Implementing the National Biodiversity Policy
(Decision no 40 of 7 February 2006, of the National Biodiversity Commission –
CONABIO), and by the National Protected Areas Strategic Plan – PNAP (Decree nº
5758 of 13 April 2006).
The methodology used to revise the Priority Areas for the Conservation,
Sustainable Use, and Sharing of Benefits from the Brazilian Biodiversity was discussed
in the workshop “Updating the Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and
Sharing of Benefits from Biodiversity – Targets and Tools”, held in November 2005,
and was later approved by CONABIO Decision nº 39 of 14 December 2005 (annex
11.3). This methodology adopted the Map of Brazilian Biomes (IBGE 2004) as its
starting point, and applied an approach that promotes greater objectivity and efficiency;
creates a memory of the procedures to identify priorities; promotes greater participation;
and generates information to allow informed decisions and capacity to assess
opportunities.
MMA made available the ways and means necessary to update the Priority
Areas, ensuring public participation and the achievement of results, which reflect the
decisions of the working groups that participated in the regional workshops, and were
supported by the databases compiled during the preparation steps of the process.
The process of updating the Priority Areas and Actions for Biodiversity was
conducted simultaneously for all Brazilian biomes and counted with the support of the
following institutions: IBAMA, FUNBIO, Fundação Biodiversitas, GTZ, WWF, TNC,
CI, IPAM, ISA, COIAB, CNS, GTA, SOS MATA ATLÂNTICA, GEF CAATINGA,
and APNE. The first step of the process was represented by the Technical Meetings held
from May to September 2006, which defined conservation targets, conservation goals,
the relative importance of the areas for each target, and prepared a Map of the Important
Areas for Biodiversity. These products were used as resource information in the
Regional Biome Workshops, which were held from October to December 2006.
The results of the Regional Biome Workshops were systematized in the map
containing the updated Priority Areas, which was approved by CONABIO Decision no
46, of 20 December 2006 (annex 11.4). These updated Priority Areas were officially
recognized by MMA Administrative Ruling n° 9, of 23 January 2007 (annex 11.5), to
6
be applied in the development and implementation of public policies, programs,
projects, and activities directed at: the in situ conservation of biodiversity; sustainable
use of biodiversity components; sharing of benefits resulting from the access to genetic
resources and associated traditional knowledge; research and inventories on
biodiversity; recuperation of degraded areas and of overexploited species or species
threatened with extinction; and the economic valuation of biodiversity.
João Paulo Ribeiro Capobianco
Executive Secretary
7
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
ACAS
ANA
ANP
APA
APNE
ARIE
ARPA
CBD
CEC
CENPES
CEPENE
CEPLAC
CGZAM
CI
CIRM
CNS
COIAB
CONABIO
COP
COZAM
CPB
CPP
CPRM
CSR
DAP
DCBIO
Central Waters of the South Atlantic; Água Central do
Atlântico Sul
National Water Agency; Agência Nacional de Águas
National Oil Agency; Agência Nacional do Petróleo
Environmental Protection Area; Área de Proteção Ambiental
Northeastern Plants Association; Associação Plantas do
Nordeste
Area of Relevant Ecological Interest; Área de Relevante
Interesse Ecológico
Amazon Protected Areas Program; Programa Áreas Protegidas
da Amazônia - MMA
Convention on Biological Diversity
Key Ecological Characteristics; Características Ecológicas
Chave
Petrobras’s Research Center; Centro de Pesquisas - Petrobras
Northeastern Coastal Fisheries Research and Management
Center; Centro de Pesquisa e Gestão de Recursos Pesqueiros
do Litoral Nordeste - IBAMA
Executive Commission of the Cocoa Cultivation Plan;
Comissão Executiva do Plano da Lavoura Cacaueira
General Coordination of Environmental Zoning and
Management; Coordenação Geral de Zoneamento e
Monitoramento Ambiental - IBAMA
Conservation International - Brazil
Interministerial Commission for Marine Resources; Comissão
Interministerial sobre os Recursos do Mar
National Rubber Tappers Council; Conselho Nacional de
Seringueiros
Coordination of the Brazilian Amazon Indigenous
Organizations; Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da
Amazônia Brasileira
National Biodiversity Commission; Comissão Nacional de
Biodiversidade
Conference of the Parties to the CBD
Environmental Zoning Coordination; Coordenação de
Zoneamento Ambiental - IBAMA
Brazilian Primates Protection Center; Centro de Proteção de
Primatas Brasileiros - IBAMA
Pantanal Research Center; Centro de Pesquisa do Pantanal
Brazilian Geological Service; Serviço Geológico do Brasil
Remote Sensing Center; Centro de Sensoriamento Remoto IBAMA
Protected Areas Directorate; Diretoria de Áreas Protegidas MMA
Department of Biodiversity Conservation; Departamento de
Conservação da Biodiversidade - MMA
8
DIFAP
DIPRO
DIREC
DISAM
EMBRAPA
ESEC
FLONA
FNMA
FUNAI
FUNBIO
FUNCATE
FVA
GEF
GERCO
GERCOM
GIS
GT
GTA
GTZ
IBAMA
IBGE
IMAZON
INPA
INPE
IPAM
ISA
ISPN
IUCN
MMA
MN
Fauna and Fisheries Directorate; Diretoria de Fauna e
Recursos Pesqueiros - IBAMA
Environmental Protection Directorate; Diretoria de Proteção
Ambiental - MMA
Ecosystems Directorate; Diretoria de Ecossistemas - IBAMA
Socio-environmental Development Directorate; Diretoria de
Desenvolvimento Socioambiental - IBAMA
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation; Empresa
Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária
Ecological Station; Estação Ecológica
National Forest; Floresta Nacional
National Environment Fund; Fundo Nacional do Meio
Ambiente - MMA
National Indigenous People’s Foundation; Fundação Nacional
do Índio
Brazilian Biodiversity Fund; Fundo Brasileiro para a
Biodiversidade
Space Technology, Application and Science Foundation;
Fundação de Ciência, Aplicações e Tecnologias Espaciais
Vitória Amazônia Foundation; Fundação Vitória Amazônia
Global Environment Fund
National Coastal Management Program; Programa Nacional de
Gerenciamento Costeiro - MMA
Information System of the Coastal and Marine Management;
Sistema de Informações do Gerenciamento Costeiro e Marinho
Geographical Information System
Working Group; Grupo de Trabalho
Amazon Working Group; Grupo de Trabalho Amazônico
German Technical Cooperation; Deutsche Gesellschaft für
Technische Zusammenarbeit
Brazilian Institute for the Environment and Renewable Natural
Resources; Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e Recursos
Naturais Renováveis
Brazilian Geography and Statistics Institute; Instituto Brasileiro
de Geografia e Estatística
Amazon Man and Environment Institute; Instituto do Homem e
Meio Ambiente da Amazônia
National Amazon Research Institute; Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas da Amazônia
National Space Research Institute; Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais
Amazon Environmental Research Institute; Instituto de
Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia
Socio-environmental Institute; Instituto Sócio-Ambiental
Society, Population and Nature Institute; Instituto Sociedade,
População e Natureza
World Conservation Union
Brazilian Ministry of the Environment; Ministério do Meio
Ambiente
Natural Monument; Monumento Natural
9
MNRJ
MONAPE
MPEG
NAPMA
NASA
NBC
NCP
NGO
NZCM
OEMA
PA
PAN-Bio
PARES; PE
PARNA; PN
PNAP
PNB
PPP/ECOS
PROBIO
PRODES
ProVárzea
RAN
RAPPAM
RDS
RVS
REBIO; RB
REMAC
RESEX
REVIZEE
Rio de Janeiro National Museum; Museu Nacional do Rio de
Janeiro
National Fishermen Movement; Movimento Nacional de
Pescadores
Emílio Goeldi Museum of Pará; Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
Atlantic Forest Advisory and Planning Nucleus; Núcleo de
Assessoria e Planejamento da Mata Atlântica - MMA
National Aeronautics and Space Administration – USA
Caatinga Biome Nucleus; Núcleo do Bioma Caatinga - MMA
Cerrado and Pantanal Nucleus; Núcleo Cerrado e Pantanal MMA
Non-Governmental Organization
Coastal and Marine Zone Nucleus; Núcleo da Zona Costeira e
Marinha - MMA
State Environmental Organization; Organização Estadual de
Meio Ambiente
Protected Area; Unidade de Conservação
Directives and Priorities of the Action Plan for PNB
implementation; Diretrizes e Prioridades do Plano de Ação
para implementação da PNB
State Park; Parque Estadual
National Park; Parque Nacional
National Protected Areas Strategic Plan; Plano Estratégico
Nacional de Áreas Protegidas
National Biodiversity Policy; Política Nacional de
Biodiversidade
Small Eco-social Grants Program; Programa de Pequenos
Projetos Ecossociais
Project on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of
Biodiversity; Projeto de Conservação e Utilização Sustentável
da Biodiversidade - MMA
Satellite Monitoring of the Brazilian Amazon Forest;
Monitoramento da Floresta Amazônica Brasileira por Satélite
- INPE
Floodplain Natural Resources Management Project; Projeto
Manejo dos Recursos Naturais da Várzea - IBAMA
Center for the Conservation and Management of Reptiles and
Amphibians; Centro de Conservação e Manejo de Répteis e
Anfíbios - IBAMA
Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area
Management
Sustainable
Development
Reserve;
Reserva
de
Desenvolvimento Sustentável
Wildlife Reserve; Reserva de Vida Silvestre
Biological Reserve; Reserva Biológica
Continental Shore Survey Program; Programa de
Reconhecimento da Margem Continental - Petrobrás/CENPES
Extractive Reserve; Reserva Extrativista
Program on the Assessment of the Sustainable Potential of
Living Resources in the Exclusive Economic Zone; Programa
10
RPPN
SBF
SDS
SDS-AM
SEMA
SEPLAN
SIPAM
SRTM
TI
TNC
UFAM
UFG
UFGs
UFMA
UFMG
UFMT
UFPE
UFRGS
UFRJ
UnB
UNDP
UP
USP
WCS
WWF
ZEE
ZEE
de Avaliação do Potencial Sustentável de Recursos Vivos na
Zona Econômica e Exclusiva - MMA
Private Reserve of the Natural Heritage; Reserva Particular do
Patrimônio Natural
Secretariat of Biodiversity and Forests; Secretaria de
Biodiversidade e Florestas - MMA
Secretariat of Sustainable Development; Secretaria de
Desenvolvimento Sustentável - MMA
Amazon State Secretariat for the Environment and Sustainable
Development; Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e
Desenvolvimento Sustentável/AM
Secretariat of the Environment; Secretaria de Meio Ambiente
Secretariat of Planning; Secretaria de Planejamento
Amazon Protection System; Sistema de Proteção da Amazônia
Shuttle Radar Topography Mission
Indigenous Land; Terra Indígena
The Nature Conservancy
Amazonas Federal University; Universidade Federal do
Amazonas
Goiás Federal University; Universidade Federal de Goiás
Phytogeographical Units; Unidades Fitogeográficas
Maranhão Federal University; Universidade Federal do
Maranhão
Minas Gerais Federal University; Universidade Federal de
Minas Gerais
Mato Grosso Federal University; Universidade Federal do
Mato Grosso
Pernambuco Federal University; Universidade Federal de
Pernambuco
Rio Grande do Sul Federal University; Universidade Federal
do Rio Grande do Sul
Rio de Janeiro Federal University; Universidade Federal do
Rio de Janeiro
Brasília University; Universidade de Brasília
United Nations Development Program
Planning Unit; Unidade de Planejamento
São Paulo University; Universidade de São Paulo
Wildlife Conservation Society
World Wide Fund for Nature
Exclusive Economic Zone; Zona Econômica Exclusiva
Ecological-Economic
Zoning;
Zoneamento
Ecológicoeconômico
11
Index
1. Introduction to the Assessment Process ..................................................................... 14 1.1. Technical Meetings ............................................................................................. 15 1.2. Data processing ................................................................................................... 15 1.3. Regional Workshops ........................................................................................... 16 1.4. Preparation of the Final Map ............................................................................... 17 2. Amazon Biome ........................................................................................................... 19 2.1. Background.......................................................................................................... 19 2.2. Technical Meetings and data processing ............................................................. 20 2.2.1. Definition of Conservation Targets .................................................................. 21 2.2.2. Definition of Conservation Goals ..................................................................... 23 2.3. Regional Workshops ........................................................................................... 25 2.4. Results ................................................................................................................. 29 3. Pantanal Biome ........................................................................................................... 32 3.1. Background.......................................................................................................... 32 3.2. Technical Meetings and data processing ............................................................. 32 3.2.1. Definition of Conservation Targets .................................................................. 33 3.2.2. Definition of Conservation Goals ..................................................................... 34 3.3. Regional Workshop ............................................................................................. 35 3.4. Results ................................................................................................................. 36 4. Cerrado Biome............................................................................................................ 40 4.1. Background.......................................................................................................... 40 4.2. Technical Meetings and data processing ............................................................. 41 4.2.1. Definition of Conservation Targets .................................................................. 41 4.2.2. Definition of Conservation Goals ..................................................................... 43 4.3. Regional Workshops ........................................................................................... 44 4.4. Results ................................................................................................................. 45 5.1. Background.......................................................................................................... 49 5.2. Technical Meetings and data processing ............................................................. 50 5.2.1. Definition of Conservation Targets .................................................................. 50 5.2.2. Definition of Conservation Goals ..................................................................... 51 5.2.3. Description of UPs and use of the natural formation databases ....................... 52 5.3. Regional Workshop ............................................................................................. 53 5.4. Results ................................................................................................................. 54 6. Atlantic Forest Biome................................................................................................. 57 6.1. Background.......................................................................................................... 57 6.2. Technical Meeting and data processing............................................................... 59 6.2.1. Definition of Conservation Targets .................................................................. 59 6.2.2. Definition of Conservation Goals ..................................................................... 60 6.3. Regional Workshops ........................................................................................... 62 6.4. Results ................................................................................................................. 65 7.1. Background.......................................................................................................... 69 7.2. Technical Meetings and data processing ............................................................. 71 7.2.1. Definition of Conservation Targets .................................................................. 71 7.2.2. Definition of Conservation Goals ..................................................................... 72 7.3. Regional Workshop ............................................................................................. 73 7.4. Results ................................................................................................................. 75 8. Coastal and Marine Zone............................................................................................ 78 8.1. Background.......................................................................................................... 78 12
8.2. Technical Meetings and data processing ............................................................. 83 8.3. Regional Workshops ........................................................................................... 89 8.4. Results ................................................................................................................. 92 9. Results ........................................................................................................................ 98 9.1. Overall Results ........................................................................................................ 98 10. References .............................................................................................................. 105 11.1. Decree No. 5092, of 21 May 2004 .................................................................. 116 11.2. MMA Administrative Ruling no 126, of 27 May 2004 ................................... 117 11.3. CONABIO Decision nº 39, of 14 December 2005 .......................................... 118 11.4. CONABIO Decision n°46, of 20 December 2006 .......................................... 126 11.5. MMA Administrative Ruling nº 9, of 23 January 2007 .................................. 127 11.6. Guidance for Regional Workshops ................................................................. 129 1. Background........................................................................................................... 129 2. Objective of the Regional Workshops .................................................................. 130 3. Participants Invited to the Regional Workshops .................................................. 130 4. Main Information Sources .................................................................................... 131 5. Main activities of the regional events ................................................................... 131 5.1. The first activity will be the revision of the limits of the priority areas ................ 131 5.2. The second activity will be the Characterization of the Defined Areas ................ 132 5.3. The third activity will be Detailing the most adequate Actions for the Area: ....... 132 5.4. The fourth activity will be to set the PRIORITY degree for each area ................. 134 6. Questions and Answers: ....................................................................................... 135 11.7. Lists of Participants of the Technical Meetings by Biome.............................. 144 11.8. Lists of Participants of the Regional Workshops by Biome ............................ 158 11.9. List of Priority Areas by Biome ...................................................................... 180 11.10. List of Conservation Targets and Goals by Biome........................................ 277 13
1. Introduction to the Assessment Process
The process to update the priority areas for the conservation, sustainable use and
sharing of benefits from Brazilian biodiversity was based on some initial assumptions:
•
recognition of the importance of the previous priority-setting process and of
the advances achieved with the Priority Areas for Biodiversity;
•
need to incorporate up-to-date knowledge on biodiversity and more current
methodologies for planning and processing available information;
•
greater governmental participation in the leadership of the process, to ensure
incorporation of the results in governmental actions; and
•
the final product should not only have sound technical basis but also result
from a negotiation process among representatives of various sectors.
Based on these assumptions, the methodology adopted for the process to update
the Priority Areas for Biodiversity incorporated the concepts and tools of the Systematic
Planning for Conservation, which are:
•
conservation targets – biodiversity components (e.g.: species, habitats,
ecosystems, etc.) that should be conserved, and that had their areas of
occurrence spatially defined;
•
conservation goals – quantitative measure necessary to ensure resilience of
the various targets in the long term;
•
representativeness – the selected set of areas must contain a representative
sample of the region’s biodiversity;
•
complementarity – new areas should be incorporated with the purpose of
maximizing the number of conservation targets/goals covered;
•
irrepleaceability – the candidate areas must be classified according to their
potential contribution to achieve the defined conservation goals and the
effect of their unavailability in relation to other areas;
•
efficiency and flexibility – the selected areas must provide maximum
biodiversity protection with the smallest spatial distance among the various
possible options, determined by the cost/protection ratio; and
•
vulnerability – areas must be selected giving priority to those biodiversity
conservation actions with the highest probability or imminence to eliminate
threats to biodiversity targets.
The approach of the Systematic Planning for Conservation and the prioritysetting tools are constantly evolving, especially the procedures involving geoprocessing
and mathematical modeling. These technological tools support the decision-making
process reducing its subjectivity, but should not replace the participatory process and
negotiation for defining priorities and actions. To legitimate the definition of priority
areas it was fundamental to maintain the participatory aspect, with extensive
consultation and incorporation of interests and information from various sectors.
To organize the process and to ensure the integration of the information
produced, the Map of the Brazilian Biomes (IBGE 2004) was adopted as the reference
for borders to establish the priority areas.
14
As general guidance, the officially Protected Areas were considered priority
areas for biodiversity with no need for qualification, since specific studies were already
conducted as part of the process to create them. Nevertheless, the priority actions,
opportunities, threats, degree of importance, and priority for action for each Protected
Area were defined during the regional workshops.
1.1. Technical Meetings
Technical meetings were held for each Biome, with the participation of
representatives from the government, academia, research institutions, and
environmental organizations. The objective of these meetings was to define the
conservation targets, establish their respective conservation goals, relative importance,
and databases (see the lists of participants of the technical meetings per biome in annex
11.7). The following target categories were considered:
•
Biodiversity Targets: species that are endemic, of limited distribution, or
threatened; habitats; phytophysiognomies; exceptional or rare biological
phenomena; and biodiversity substitutes (environmental units which indicate
biological diversity, e.g.: geomorphological and oceanographic phenomena,
watersheds or interfluve areas, among others);
•
Sustainable Use Targets: species of economic, medicinal or phytotherapic
importance; areas/species which are important for traditional populations and
for maintaining their knowledge; flag species that can provide incentives to
conservation and sustainable use actions; key species on which the
sustainable use of biodiversity components depends; areas that are important
for conservation-based development; areas providing environmental services
to agricultural areas (such as crops that depend on pollination and biological
control); areas that are important to the cultural and social diversity
associated to biodiversity; and
•
Resilience and Process Targets: areas important for maintaining
environmental services (climate maintenance, bio-geochemical cycles,
hydrological processes, aquifer recharge areas); areas with high endemism
rate and evolutionary processes; areas important for clustering, migratory
and pollinating species; climatic refuges; connectivity and gene flow areas;
areas protecting watersheds; areas important for maintaining the flood
regime of wetlands; extensive areas for long-ranging species.
Objective, quantitative goals were set for each conservation target. Existing
international policies and commitments were taken into consideration to define goals
(e.g.: the Convention on Biological Diversity goals), as well as the specific
characteristics of each target (e.g.: rarity, extension of the area of occurrence, current
condition, vulnerability) (see the list of conservation targets and goals defined for each
biome in annex 11.10).
1.2. Data processing
A process of data inventory and systematization was initiated based on the
results of the technical meetings. Maps indicating irreplaceable areas were generated
using decision-making supporting tools such as the C-Plan software (NPWS-NSW,
15
2003). These maps set forth the degree of biological importance of each selected area to
attain the conservation goals established for the identified conservation targets.
Simulations of the best combination of areas to address the established set of
targets and goals were generated using the MARXAN mathematical modeling software
(Ball and Possingham, 2000).
The Ministry of the Environment endeavored to systematize an information set,
including maps and satellite images, to support the identification of priority areas and
actions. It is important to note the fundamental role of the Brazilian Biomes Vegetation
Cover Map at the 1:250,000 scale, based on 2002 data, commissioned by MMA with
PROBIO resources, which was essential to identify the current status of the areas.
1.3. Regional Workshops
Representatives of the government, academia, environmental organizations,
organizations representing traditional peoples and communities, and the private sector
were invited to participate in the regional workshops (see the list of participants of the
Regional Workshops per Biome in annex 11.8).
The systematized information set was used to support discussions held in the
regional workshops, allowing each sector’s interests and perspective to be considered
during negotiations (annex 11.6). The regional workshops also took into consideration
the areas instituted by MMA Administrative Ruling no 126, of 2004. For each identified
area, the participants described its characteristics, threats, opportunities for
conservation, degree of importance, and priority for the implementation of the set of
conservation, sustainable use, and benefit-sharing actions which were considered most
adequate:
•
Conservation actions: creation of protected areas, expansion of existing
protected areas, establishment of no-fishing zones, incentive to the
establishment of mosaics of protected areas, enforcement and control, among
others;
•
Management actions: implementation and consolidation of protected areas,
management of watersheds and water resources, recuperation of degraded
areas, establishment of ecological corridors, sustainable management of
natural resources, management of pests and invasive species, resolution of
management conflicts in protected areas, enforcement and control, among
others;
•
Research actions: biological inventories, biodiversity monitoring, specific
studies on population dynamics, long-term research, among others;
•
Institutional actions: ratification of Indigenous Lands, recognition of
Quilombo Lands, implementation of Watershed Committees, EcologicalEconomic Zoning, implementation of environmental education programs,
implementation of economic mechanisms to support biodiversity
conservation, among others; and
•
Other required actions.
The areas identified in this process were classified according to their degree of
importance to biodiversity and urgency for the implementation of suggested actions. To
that end, the following symbols were adopted:
16
•
Biological Importance:
•
Urgency for action:
1.4. Preparation of the Final Map
Strong effort was applied to eliminate overlap in the preparation of the final map
of priority areas, since this would increase the estimates of the total area without
actually representing an effective increase of the priority areas. To that end, all new
indicated areas that overlapped with areas that were already protected were partially or
completely excluded, maintaining the original shape of the protected area. Among areas
already under protection, the Indigenous Lands were always considered untouchable
and were left intact. On the other hand, overlaps among existing protected areas were
maintained, considering the strongest protection category for the analysis: existing full
protection protected areas prevail over the existing sustainable use protected areas with
which they overlap; among the older protected areas, when falling in the same category
of protection: federal areas prevail over state areas (and the same is valid for the
state/municipal areas). Only the broader categories (full protection vs. sustainable use)
were considered for these analyses, ignoring the specific category of the area (park,
ecological station – ESEC, biological reserve – REBIO, etc.). Since borders were
altered and some protected areas were excluded to eliminate overlap (maintaining the
limits of the protected area providing stronger protection), the priority areas map does
not include all protected areas and presents modified polygons for several protected
areas. Therefore, this map should not be considered a source of information on
protected areas. More precise maps of the officially protected areas can be obtained with
MMA, IBAMA and OEMAs. Additionally, when overlap occurred for areas indicated
by different workshops, the project coordination made the necessary spatial adjustments
in the final map, also adjusting the database and incorporating the information on
overlapping areas.
The project coordination team organized recommendations and actions recorded
in the database prepared by each working group in a hierarchy to define the priority
actions for each area. For that purpose, the following order was adopted: (1) the creation
17
of protected areas, whenever recommended, was considered a priority action; (2)
specific recommendations, such as recuperation of degraded areas or watershed
management, received priority over broader actions, such as conducting biological
inventories, enforcement, and environmental education.
18
2. Amazon Biome
2.1. Background
The Amazon biome is characterized by its vast dimension: it occupies almost
50% of the national territory; this is where the largest watershed is located, with the
largest volume of freshwater in the world; and it represents the largest continuous block
of tropical forest in the world. Unlike the other Brazilian biomes, most of the Amazon is
still relatively well conserved, which represents an extraordinary opportunity for a
society increasingly aware of the importance of biodiversity and environmental
services. This is the opportunity to implement development while maintaining the
natural and cultural richness that comprise the fantastic socio-biodiversity of the
Amazon.
To seize this opportunity is everyone’s challenge: government, society, business
sector, communities, and individuals. The challenge is expressed by the destruction of
the forest which, despite having significantly decreased in the past few years, still places
Brazil among the five largest emitters of carbon dioxide, with the consequent impact on
global warming. Of the Brazilian emissions, approximately 70% result from
deforestation.
Studies have shown that forest losses may have strong impact on the region’s
water cycle. By reducing leaf area, the conversion of forest into pastures enormously
reduces evapotranspiration, which may have drastic effects on the rain regime, since
half of the Amazon rain is attributed to water recycled through the forest. Alteration of
the rain regime could be one of the main drivers of the savannization of a large portion
of the biome, which is predicted by simulations of global warming effects. It was
estimated that, to maintain the present rain regime, it would be necessary to maintain
approximately 70% of the original forest cover (Silva-Dias et al.2002).
Although the Amazon biodiversity currently receives less media attention than
environmental services, the biodiversity is one of the most valuable attributes of the
region. The biome’s vast area and enormous variety of ecosystems are home to a
biological diversity that figures among the largest in the world – but the complexity of
its habitats and the limited knowledge about its fauna and flora make it difficult to
estimate numbers. To this date, research expeditions continue to reveal species that are
new to science, and to change the known patterns of distribution at a surprising
frequency (Peres 2005; Cohn-Haft et al., in press). The loss of biodiversity, associated
to the environmental degradation processes, is therefore invaluable. Many of the current
and potential uses of biodiversity also justify efforts to avoid its loss (Fearnside, 2003).
Experts have recommended the creation of protected areas as one of the most
effective measures to contain the advance of deforestation (Ferreira and Venticinque,
2005). According to this approach, even though the full protection protected areas are
the most efficient, sustainable use protected areas and indigenous lands are significant,
given the area they cover (approximately 35% of the biome) and their relevant role in
maintaining socio-biodiversity. Social diversity represents the conservation of
knowledge on nature and management techniques that are important for maintaining
biological diversity, in addition to representing the maintenance of the large variety of
cultural and ethnic features of the Amazon.
Therefore, considering the enormous importance of the Amazon forest to the
sustainability of the region and of the planet, and its great potential for the region’s
19
economic development, the various social groups involved in this priority updating
process recognize over 80% of the biome as “Priority Areas for Biodiversity”. These
areas reflect concern with biodiversity, social sustainability, economic development,
and maintenance of environmental services, and include the recommendation of actions
that go beyond the creation of protected areas.
2.2. Technical Meetings and data processing
The technical meetings had the objective to provide resource information to the
preparation of the Biological Importance Map, through the definition of conservation
targets and their respective goals. Initially, only one technical meeting was proposed for
the Amazon biome, and held in Cuiabá/MT, from 11 to 15 September, 2006. This
meeting counted 101 participants, including experts from governmental agencies,
academia, and non-governmental organizations. It also included other representatives
from governmental agencies and from the organized civil society, since the involvement
of the various stakeholders from the beginning of the process would ease their
commitment with the subsequent steps (see the list of participants in annex 11.7.1). All
work related to the Amazon biome was supported by the Amazon Protected Areas
Program – ARPA, and its partners.
The objective of the meeting was to prepare the Biological Importance Map
during the event, to allow its examination by the plenary and any adjustment, if needed.
This event was named a Technical Meeting, since very specific products were expected
from it. To make this strategy viable, the updating of the Priority Areas for Biodiversity
was broadly publicized about a month prior to the meeting, and all possible stakeholders
were requested to organize themselves and to make available any electronic and georeferenced database that could collaborate with the process. To support the preparation
of the map during the technical meeting, and the opening presentation on the history of
the process and proposed methodology, strong investment was made to prepare a
summary presentation on the Systematic Planning for Conservation and its basic
criteria, to explain the software’s role in supporting decision making in each step of the
process. Specific presentations defined and exemplified conservation targets and goals,
and discussed case studies where this methodology was applied.
The event comprised three different types of group work: (1) identification of
conservation targets; (2) definition of conservation goals; and (3) discussion and
identification of proposals to improve the next steps of the process. For the next steps,
the working groups proposed a few important changes in the process. Among these,
holding smaller technical meetings was recommended, to be convened in renowned
academic organizations such as the Emílio Goeldi Museum of Pará – MPEG, the
Amazon National Research Institute – INPA, and the Brazilian Society for the Progress
of Science – SBPC, to allow a larger number of experts to assess the proposed
conservation targets and goals. These meetings were convened on October 11 (MPEG),
13 (INPA), and 16 (SBPC), 2006 with 31, 10, and 9 participants, respectively. Since the
conservation targets proposed by the Cuiabá Technical Meeting resulted in a
homogeneous prioritization of the entire biome, these additional meetings assisted the
project coordination team to adjust the originally proposed targets, particularly those
considered less consistent by the experts. These adjustments were presented and
discussed with the participants of the subsequent steps of the process.
20
2.2.1. Definition of Conservation Targets
Four working groups – GTs were formed to define targets. The composition of
these groups was defined by the team coordinating the event. Efforts were made to keep
the size of the groups as similar as possible, yet selecting participants from various
backgrounds to each working group. All GTs worked simultaneously on the task of
proposing conservation targets and defining how to select them based on the available
information. For that purpose, each meeting room was equipped with a datashow and a
computer containing all available databases. The coordination team ensured that all GTs
counted with at least one participant capable of using the GIS databases so that all GTs
had adequate access to the available information, and could indicate which databases
were the most appropriate to represent each conservation target identified. The final
definition of targets resulted from the comparison of the proposals made by all working
groups and from the plenary discussion to resolve divergences. One of the main
divergences encountered during the process was related to including information on
species among the selected targets. Those defending the inclusion of this information
argued this is the only direct information available on biodiversity distribution, while
those opposing it considered this information always includes biases, and as such can
over-value those areas that are better known. Consensus was sought by using only the
best quality information available. However, this divergence was not completely
overcome, and throughout the process both sides expressed dissatisfaction. At the end of
the process, the categories of selected targets included: aquatic habitats; terrestrial
habitats; species; centers of endemism; processes; and sustainable use.
The definition of the information to be used for composing the sets of targets
was the primary object of discussion in the Target GTs, except for the processes and
sustainable use targets, the definition of which was discussed by the Goals GTs. For all
other target types, the proposals presented by the Target GTs were discussed by the
plenary, and the best possible composition was defined (see the list of conservation
targets and goals in annex 11.10.1).
Aquatic habitats
The map of the watersheds classified as level 3 by the Ottobacias system
(Galvão and Meneses, 2005) was the basis to define aquatic habitats. This level
subdivides the Rio Negro watershed, for example, into Upper Negro, Lower Negro,
Branco, and Jauaperi, and the Rio Juruá watershed into Upper, Middle, and Lower
Juruá. Overall, the level 3 watersheds map provided by ANA subdivides the biome into
90 portions. Although this was considered the most adequate level of watersheds to
reflect differences among large groups of aquatic fauna, it was argued that this level of
subdivision alone was not enough, since it does not reflect differences among river
segments above and below waterfalls. Geological age was considered the best database
to define waterfall areas which, in the Brazilian Amazon, are associated with Paleozoic
formations. The geological age map, containing 7 classes, was provided by the INPA
GIS Laboratory. The overlap of these two maps generated 299 conservation targets.
Given the strong relationship between aquatic and terrestrial habitats in the
Amazon, it was considered that at least a portion of the priority areas should be located
next to the water bodies to obtain the desired effect of conserving a proportion of each
watershed. With this strategy, riparian forests and small water bodies would be
addressed, which are important for maintaining breeding and lateral migration habitat
for the aquatic fauna. These border areas were also considered important for the
terrestrial fauna, since they ensure access to water. To protect these habitats, the
establishment of 10-km buffer zones around the main rivers was proposed. The database
21
used to define these buffer zones was the hydrography polygons database, at the
1:250,000 scale, provided by SIPAM. To ensure the distribution of these buffer zones
among watersheds, the 10-km strip was overlapped with a level 3 watershed map,
making the buffer zone around each water body in each watershed a new conservation
target. This procedure generated 78 conservation targets.
Terrestrial Habitats
The definition of the terrestrial habitats was based on the vegetation map at the
1:250,000 scale, provided by SIPAM. In this electronic database, the vegetation types
were labeled as fractions of vegetation types, composed of two- or three-letter codes.
Since these codes were the same as those used by RADAMBRASIL, a name field was
created before the technical meeting, based on the RADAMBRASIL codes and
considering the first code in each fraction as the dominant type. A new field was created
using, whenever possible, the oldest vegetation type described for each location. This
work was performed by Bruce Nelson, from INPA, assisted by Ekena Rangel from
WWF-Brazil, and generated 49 vegetation classes. In addition to the vegetation map,
the effect of rivers as barriers, particularly for primates (Ayres and Clutton Brock, 1992)
and birds (Haffer, 1992) was considered important for the characterization of the
terrestrial habitats. Since no map of the interfluve areas was available within these
databases, a map containing 15 interfluve areas among the main rivers was generated
during the technical meeting. This map was based on the hydrography map prepared by
SIPAM (1:250,000) and the Brazilian Biomes Map (IBGE, 2004). The map of
interfluve areas was considered an important contribution to differentiate among forest
formations longitudinally but, especially for the broadleaf forests, there were important
latitudinal differences that were not detected by any of these databases (vegetation or
interfluve areas). It was argued that this differentiation could be associated with
variation in geological age, and it was proposed that the final terrestrial habitats map
should be composed by the intersection among the vegetation map, the interfluve area
map, and the geological age map. This composition generated 511 conservation targets.
Species
The only databases available at the species level included information on lizards
and primates, both provided by CI and MPEG. The Species GT recommended the
inclusion of all 95 primate species and of the 35 lizard species for which the species
distribution had been mapped. However, the lizard maps inspired doubts about the
uniformity of sampling and the type of information each map represented (whether
areas or events of occurrence). A previous selection of those species for which data was
reliable would be necessary to include this group. Since this previous selection had not
been made, a recommendation was made to the smaller technical meetings to exclude
the lizard databases from the analyses. The Species GT also recommended that goals
should be set for sub-basins, given the isolation between headwaters and consequent
high level of endemism for fish species – but their inclusion among targets was already
addressed by the set of aquatic habitat targets.
Centers of Endemism
It was decided to include the centers of endemism for Papilionidae butterflies
and for birds, since the sampling for their definition was considered more consistent.
There are 14 centers of endemism described for Papilionidae butterflies (Tyler et al.
1994) and 9 for birds (Cracraft, 1985). The endemism databases were added to the main
resource databases and made available by Conservation International. The smaller
technical meetings argued that even these centers are not widely accepted within the
scientific community and that more recent sampling efforts, especially for birds (Borges
22
et al. 2001), are proposing modifications for these standards. These discussions resulted
in the centers of endemism being one of the target groups that suffered the greatest
reduction of goals during the adjustment phase of the analysis.
Processes
One of the proposed targets was a forested area large enough to maintain
climatic function. For that purpose, the suggested target was a set of forested areas in
the southeastern watersheds of the Amazon (watersheds of the Araguaia, Tocantins,
Xingu, Tapajós, and Madeira rivers). At the smaller technical meetings, however, it was
discussed that this was not the area of greatest importance for climatic functions. The
main areas should be located along the dry corridor, which passes through the Tapajós
river towards the Guianas, and which is the first area to suffer severe savannization due
to global warming, and where conservation would have the challenge of avoiding this
process; together with the extreme northeast (cabeça-do-cachorro, or dog’s head)
which, according to simulation models, will remain forested under any scenario of
predicted emissions, conserving a portion of tropical forest in the long term (Salazar et
al., in press).
To maintain the hydrological regime of the largest rivers, it was proposed that
conservation targets should include 40% of the better conserved level 4 sub-watersheds
within each level 3 sub-watershed. The plenary discussions recommended the additional
maintenance of a portion of the region’s rivers free from infrastructure works
(hydroelectric dams, water ways, ports, or similar works), but this proposal was not
quantified.
Sustainable Use
Species and habitats important to the Amazon human populations for the
obtention of natural resources were selected as sustainable use targets. Among these, the
ones that could be mapped in the short-term were further selected: (1) areas with high
potential for wood exploitation (broadleaf evergreen forest, excluding those portions
over Proterozoic formations, which present highly irregular relief that hinders
exploitation); (2) flooded areas, given their high potential for fisheries (ISA et al, 2001);
(3) areas of mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla) occurrence, which were mapped based
on Grogan et al. (2002); (4) areas of jarina (Phytelephas macrocarpa) occurrence,
defined as the Upper Purus, Upper and Middle Juruá, and Javari river watersheds; (5)
areas of piassava palm (Leopoldina piassava) occurrence, which include the Demini,
Padauiri, and Xié river watersheds. The smaller technical meetings argued that the
mahogany map may reflect the past distribution of the species instead of the current
distribution. However, it was also underlined that the mahogany distribution pattern, as
for jarina and piassava, are common to many species – and even if these species already
had their distribution patterns altered by human use, the inclusion of their known
original areas allowed the conservation of many other species that present the same
distribution patterns.
2.2.2. Definition of Conservation Goals
The Goals GTs were organized by theme, and participants joined these groups at
their choice. Even though some participants observed that centers of endemism are
more closely related to processes than to species, the coordination team considered that
the working group discussing goals for species would be most familiarized with
biogeographical issues and would be better prepared to discuss this theme than the
group working with processes. Therefore, the working groups to define conservation
23
goals were: (1) aquatic habitats; (2) terrestrial habitats; (3) species and centers of
endemism; (4) processes; and (5) sustainable use.
Aquatic habitats: at the Cuiabá meeting, the group considered that waterfall
areas should have the highest conservation goals, due to the numerous endemisms
present in this type of habitat, followed by headwater areas and the remaining aquatic
habitat targets. The smaller technical meetings observed that waterfalls would not have
water if the headwaters were not conserved, and therefore proposed that goals should be
equivalent for these two habitat types, at 30% of the conservation target. The goals for
the remaining watersheds were defined at 20% of the conservation target. The buffer
zones around rivers in each level 3 watershed had goals defined at 60% of the
conservation target.
Terrestrial habitats: considering that intersections rendered all vegetation types
endemic to the interfluve areas and geological age strata, goals were set based mainly
on the area of occurrence of each habitat. Habitats with size smaller than 50,000
hectares had their conservation goal defined at 100% of the conservation target. For the
other habitat sizes, the goals were set at 60% of the target for those between 50,000 and
500,000 hectares, 40% for habitats between 500,000 and 5 million hectares, and 20% of
the conservation target for those larger than 5 million hectares.
Primate species: conservation goals were set at 100% of the target for those
primate species with total distribution size smaller than 3 million hectares. Area size for
conservation goals was estimated as the minimum area to maintain viable populations of
species in this group, particularly those of smaller primates, which in general have more
limited distribution. For the remaining species, the conservation goal was set at 20% of
the conservation target when species distribution exceeded 3 million hectares.
Centers of endemism: the conservation goal for Papilionidae butterflies was set
at 10% of the target for the Manaus-Guiana center of endemism, which is the largest
one for this group and was used as the basis to estimate this goal, and at 15% of the
conservation target for the remaining centers. The Belém Endemism Center was the
basis to define the goals for bird endemism centers. The centers smaller than or
equivalent to the Belém center (Sub-center Duidae, Sub-center Gran Sabana, Imeri,
Inambari, and Napo) had goals set at 15% of the target. The goals for the larger centers
(Guiana, Inambari, Rondônia, and Tapajós) were set at 10% of the target.
The forested area within the southeastern watersheds of the Amazon was given a
conservation goal of 20% of the target, as for all the sustainable use targets. The goal
proposed for the most untouched watersheds was of 40% of the target, meaning that for
the total area of each level 3 sub-watershed 40% of the level 4 watersheds should be
conserved. This latter was the only object not expressed in the relevant areas map, and a
recommendation was made to the regional workshops to consider the conservation of
watersheds.
Description of the Planning Units and use of the natural formation bases
The planning units used for assessing priority areas in the Amazon were
hexagons of 50,000 hectares, generated by a Patch Analyst extension of the Arc-View
software. Hexagons located within the limits of full protection protected areas only were
dissolved to respect the actual borders of the protected areas. The contours of the other
types of protected area and indigenous lands were inserted in the planning units’
database, but the shape of the hexagons was maintained.
24
An irreplaceability map was generated with C-Plan. To avoid extremely
degraded areas, hexagons that were over 80% deforested according to PRODES 2005
data (INPE-OBT, 2007) were excluded from the solution. This procedure altered some
irreplaceability values, but also revealed the impossibility to achieve the conservation
goals for 63 of the 1012 conservation targets, noting that for 10 of them the goals were
reduced by more than 50%.
The MINSET algorithm of the C-Plan was used to generate the polygons map,
with the following selection criteria: (1) maximum irreplaceability; (2) maximum
proportion of contribution; (3) rarity of the target; (4) overall rarity; and (5) number of
targets addressed. The maximum irreplaceability and rarity criteria were most
effectively used by the system. To simplify future references to this map, from now on
this text will refer to it as the “system proposal”.
Technical Team
Ronaldo Weigand Jr. (MMA-ARPA- General Coordinator); Ana Luisa Albernaz
(ARPA-GTZ/MPEG- Technical Coordinator for the Amazon Biome); Daniela de
Oliveira e Silva (MMA-ARPA- Executive Coordinator); Rejane Andrade and Isabel
Castro (MMA-ARPA- Logistics), Walkyria Moraes (ARPA-GTZ- Moderator), Eduardo
Felizola and Javier Fawaz (ARPA-FUNBIO/Greentec - Geoprocessing).
Figure 2.2.1 – Biological Importance Map of the Amazon Biome
2.3. Regional Workshops
Three regional workshops were convened for the Amazon biome. The first was
held in Brasília, from October 24 to 27, 2006 and included discussions on the states of
Maranhão, Tocantins, Mato Grosso, and Rondônia (see list of participants in annex
11.8.1). The second regional workshop was held in Belém, from November 6 to 9,
25
2006, including discussions on the sates of Acre, Amazonas, Roraima, Pará, and Amapá
(see list of participants in annex 11.8.2). The third workshop, held in Manaus from
December 6 to 7, 2006, discussed the priority classification of indigenous lands and had
the same geographic scope as the second workshop (Acre, Amazonas, Roraima, Pará,
and Amapá) (see list of participants in annex 11.8.3). The fist two workshops counted,
respectively, with 105 and 119 participants, including representatives from academia
(16%), environmental NGOs (19%), social and indigenous organizations (22%), and
federal and state governmental agencies (43%). The third workshop had 61 participants,
including the technical support team (10%), and representatives from indigenous
peoples (42%), organizations working with indigenous groups (12%), academia
(anthropologists and specialists on indigenous issues – 18%), and the federal
government (MMA, FUNAI – 18%).
As suggested by the Technical Meeting’s Next Steps GTs, each Regional
Workshop was preceded by a one-day Preparatory Meeting to discuss social demands.
The objective of these meetings preceding the first and second regional workshops was
to organize the demands for the creation of sustainable use protected areas, which were
collated into a single proposal presented by the institutions supporting the organization
of these events: IBAMA - DISAM, ISA, and CNS. The preparatory meeting for the
third regional workshop had the purpose of presenting information and providing
guidance to representatives of indigenous groups for participating in the activities; as
well as to define criteria to classify the indigenous lands according to importance and
urgency for action. In addition to the partners listed above, this meeting also counted
with support from COIAB.
Participants of the regional workshops were organized in discussing groups
according to the Amazonian states, mostly due to the fact that many states have their
own territorial planning instruments, such as ZEEs. Biogeographical or environmental
dynamics similarities led the coordination team to group some areas from different
states, and the size or occupancy complexity of particular areas led to the subdivision of
other states. As a result, the state of Mato Grosso had two working groups
corresponding to the Xingu and Tapajós watersheds; the state of Rondônia was also
divided in two, one for the area to the north of BR-364 highway, and one for the area
south of this highway; the state of Amazonas was divided in two by the SolimõesAmazonas river. The northern portion of Amazonas was joined with the Roraima state
for discussion. The state of Pará was divided into east and west portions separated by
the Xingu river, and a third portion identified as Northern Arm, to the north of the
Amazonas river. The Northern Arm was joined with the Amapá state for discussions.
Since the second regional workshop was held simultaneously with the Coastal Zone
workshop, priority areas were defined separately by the teams of both biomes, and later
both teams gathered for the final decisions.
The regional workshop working groups generally followed the same
methodology: first, the respective focus area was separated into large blocks defined
according to the human occupancy dynamics, environmental characteristics, and/or
predominant economic activities. Some examples of dividing lines are major roads such
as BR-174 and BR-163, floodplain areas, groups of settlements, or pristine forest
blocks. For each of these smaller divisions, the preliminary areas proposed by the
analysis software were evaluated first, particularly regarding the presence of protected
areas, deforestation, and human occupancy. The main databases used to assess
deforestation were PRODES-2005, Brazilian Biomes Vegetation Cover Map (MMA,
2007), Google Earth, and Biota-Pará (provided by CI and MPEG for eastern Pará state).
26
Human occupancy was assessed based on the IBGE localities database, which was
processed and provided by TNC, combined with direct knowledge of local inhabitants.
This approach indicated whether the polygon should be considered a new priority area
and if it should be maintained where the analysis software placed it, or if it should be
moved. To move polygons, the irreplaceability map was consulted to identify hexagons
of greater value for conservation close to each polygon under evaluation. The outline of
each polygon was adjusted following this analysis, mostly based on natural features,
particularly hydrography (SIPAM database 1:250,000) and level 4 and 5 watersheds
(both databases were provided by ANA). Many outlines were also adjusted according to
the limits of existing protected areas, to increase connectivity among priority areas. This
methodology was also used by most working groups to analyze the locations proposed
by social demand for the creation of protected areas. These proposals were organized
during the preparatory meetings and presented by the states or IBAMA, and
incorporated most of the proposed areas as priority areas. Conflicts between proposals
of the same group were negotiated, but consensus was not always reached. In those
cases, both recommendations were included in the database.
After the priority area outline was defined, the coordination team provided the
average values of biological relevance and threat for each polygon to the working
groups, for the adjustment of the area’s classification according to urgency for action.
Biological relevance was based on the irreplaceability values obtained from the map
generated from conservation targets and goals defined in the technical meetings.
Importance of the polygons was increased based on information not included in the
systematic planning, such as the presence of endemic species, abundance of important
natural resources, size of the area (larger areas were considered more important), or
relevance for connecting other protected areas. These decisions were made mostly based
on individual knowledge detained by the participants of the working groups.
The degree of threat to each priority area was based on the model developed by
Britaldo Soares (Nelson et al., 2006). In general, greater urgency was attributed to the
most threatened areas. Because this model is mostly focused on the advance of
deforestation, the base values provided by the coordination team were altered when
other threats not included in the model caused strong stress on the defined areas. For
instance, the “dog’s head” (extreme northwest of the biome) is very far from the
deforestation frontiers and therefore was given a low threat value by the model.
However, since it is located on the country’s border, several other threats are present,
such as drug traffic and wood smuggling. The knowledge of people who live or work in
these regions was the main source of information to include these other threats. The
work of IMAZON and IPAM was of great importance for the analysis of Pará state.
The presence of endemic and threatened species, the size of the area, and its
importance for connecting protected areas were also considered to classify the
importance of protected areas. The degree of implementation of each protected area was
also considered to define the urgency for action. Protected areas already implemented,
with management plan and management councils, were considered as having less
urgency for action than protected areas under implementation. For this evaluation, in
addition to individual knowledge of participants in the working groups, information
from the RAPPAM database (IBAMA) was used to analyze full protection protected
areas, and the ISA database was used to assess the status of indigenous lands.
There was some confusion between the words urgency and priority, which were
used alternatively during the regional workshops. Due to this confusion, many working
groups defined the priority value as equal to the degree of urgency, while other working
27
groups obtained the priority value through an average between importance and urgency.
Given the use of these different criteria, at the end of the process it was suggested that,
in the next update of the priority areas, a clear distinction is made between these two
concepts.
Technical Team
Ronaldo Weigand Jr. (MMA-ARPA - General Coordinator); Marcos Reis Rosa
(MMA/Arcplan - General Technical Coordinator); Daniela de Oliveira e Silva (MMAARPA - Executive Coordinator); Ana Luisa Albernaz (ARPA-GTZ/MPEG - Technical
Coordinator for the Amazon Biome); Rejane Andrade and Isabel Castro (MMA-ARPA
- Logistics); Maria Alice and Márcia Tagore (ARPA-GTZ – Moderators of the 1st
Workshop); Márcia Tagore and Ana Rosa M. de Figueiredo (ARPA-GTZ – Moderators
of the 2nd and 3rd Workshops); Javier Fawaz (ARPA-FUNBIO/Greentec Geoprocessing).
Collaborators
Preparatory Meetings on Social Demands
Collaborating Institutions: ISA, CNS, IBAMA-DISAM, and COIAB
Coordination: Alicia Rolla (ISA), Cristina Velasquez (ISA), Francisco Apurinã
(COIAB), Leonardo Pacheco (IBAMA-DISAM), Luciene Pohl (CNS), Manuel Cunha
(CNS), and Rodrigo Rodrigues (IBAMA-DISAM).
1st Regional Workshop
Maranhão: Anselmo Oliveira (IBAMA-ProVárzea - Facilitation and Geoprocessing);
Tocantins: Eduardo Felizola (Greentec - Facilitation and Geoprocessing); Mato GrossoXingu: Daniela de Oliveira e Silva (MMA-ARPA – Facilitation) and Diogo Regis
(Greentec – Geoprocessing); Mato Grosso-Tapajós: Laura Dietzsch (IPAM Facilitation and Geoprocessing). Rondônia-North: Isabel Castro (MMA-ARPA –
Facilitation) and Marcelo Cavallini (IBAMA-DIREC – Geoprocessing); RondôniaSouth: Ekena Rangel (WWF-Brazil - Facilitation and Geoprocessing).
2nd Regional Workshop
Acre: Isabel Castro (MMA-ARPA – Facilitation) and Laura Dietzsch (IPAM –
Geoprocessing); Amapá and Pará-Northern Arm: Daniela de Oliveira e Silva (MMAARPA – Facilitation) and Diogo Regis (Greentec – Geoprocessing); Amazonas-South:
Leonardo Pacheco (IBAMA-DISAM – Facilitation); Marcelo Cavallini (IBAMADIREC- Facilitation) and Alicia Rolla (ISA – Geoprocessing); Pará-East: Anselmo
Oliveira (IBAMA-ProVárzea – Facilitation) and Eduardo Felizola (ARPAFUNBIO/Greentec – Geoprocessing); Pará-West: Fernanda Carvalho (MMA-SBF –
Facilitation) and Cícero Augusto (ISA – Geoprocessing); Roraima and AmazonasNorth: Marina Fonseca (ISA – Facilitation) and Rogério Vereza (MMA-DAP –
Geoprocessing).
3rd Regional Workshop
Acre: Dan Pasca (GTZ – Facilitation) and Anselmo Oliveira (IBAMA-ProVárzea –
Geoprocessing); Amazonas-North: Isabel Castro (MMA-ARPA – Facilitation) and
Daniela de Oliveira e Silva (MMA-ARPA – Geoprocessing); Amazonas-South:
Leonardo Pacheco (IBAMA-DISAM – Facilitation) and Alicia Rolla (ISA –
Geoprocessing); Pará: Fernanda Carvalho (MMA-SBF – Facilitation) and Sylvain
Desmoulière (INPA – Geoprocessing); Roraima, Northern Arm of Pará and Amapá:
Ronaldo Weigand (MMA-ARPA – Facilitation); Juliana Schietti (INPA Geoprocessing)
and Eduardo Felizola (ARPA-FUNBIO/Greentec – Geoprocessing).
28
2.4. Results
The final map of the Amazon priority areas is composed by 824 areas, of which
334 are new priority areas and 490 are already protected (see list of the Priority Areas
for the Amazon Biome in annex 11.9.1). The total set of priority areas covers
approximately 80% of the biome, of which over half (44.3% of the biome) is already
under some type of protection – Protected Areas or Indigenous Lands. In comparison to
the previous process to define priority areas, conducted in Macapá in 1999, despite the
reduction of the total area under analysis (the previous process encompassed the entire
Legal Amazon, while the present effort reduced the area to the limits of the biome),
there was an increase in the total number of priority areas. Under the previous process,
approximately 59% of the Amazon had been recognized as priority.
The result of this process to update the priority areas is presented below:
comparison of the frequency of biological importance classes among themselves and
between the two processes conducted in 1999 and 2006 (Table 2.4.1); comparison of the
frequency of the urgency for action classes (Table 2.4.2); distribution of the main action
indicated to each of the identified areas (Table 2.4.3); distribution of all actions
indicated to each of the identified areas (Table 2.4.4); and the final map of the Priority
Areas for the Amazon Biome (Figure 2.4.1 and insert to this publication).
Table 2.4.1 – Total extension and number of priority areas in the Amazon Biome, by Biological Importance class, as
defined in 1999 and 2006.
New 2006
Protected 2006
Total 1999
Biological
Importance
High
Very High
Extremely High
Insufficiently
Known
TOTAL
Number
of Areas
72
102
137
Total
Area
(km2)
220,104
590,713
646,050
5
316
28,735
1,485,602
%
15
40
43
2
Number
of Areas
80
98
327
Total
Area
(km2)
183,367
406,716
1,301,553
3
508
22,404
1,914,040
%
10
21
68
1
Number
of Areas
8
108
279
Total
Area
(km2)
29,919
621,436
1,812,819
2
397
32,713
2,496,888
%
1
25
73
1
Table 2.4.2 – Total extension and number of priority areas in the Amazon Biome, by Priority for Action class, as
defined in 2006.
New 2006
Protected 2006
Total 2006
Priority for
Action
High
Very High
Extremely High
TOTAL
Number
of Areas
67
85
164
316
Total
Area
(km2)
428,888
320,423
736,292
1,485,602
%
29
22
50
Number
of Areas
145
137
226
508
Total
Area
(km2)
510,553
473,600
929,886
1,914,040
%
27
25
49
Number
of Areas
212
222
390
824
Total
Area
(km2)
939,441
794,023
1,666,178
3,399,642
%
28
23
49
Table 2.4.3 – Distribution of the main priority action indicated to the priority areas of
the Amazon Biome.
Type of Priority Action
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Area
Creation of Protected Area – undefined category
Number of
Areas
44
97
25
Total Area
(km2)
207,217
437,273
164,562
Percent of the
BIOME
4.90
10.34
3.89
29
Creation of Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering Sustainable Use
Biological Inventory
Watershed Management
Territorial Planning and Regularization
Fisheries Planning and Regularization
Recognition of Indigenous/Quilombola Lands
Recuperation of Degraded Areas
Environmental Education
NEW AREAS TOTAL
Areas already under protection
TOTAL
Total Area of the Biome
25
18
2
13
46
12
18
31
3
334
490
824
116,101
73,858
1,488
91,809
189,103
83,862
33,689
111,218
10,201
1,520,382
1,873,186
3,393,568
4,228,533
2.75
1.75
0.04
2.17
4.47
1.98
0.80
2.63
0.24
35.96
44.30
80.25
Table 2.4.4 – Distribution of all actions indicated to the priority areas of the Amazon
Biome.
Number
Total Area
Indicated Actions
of Areas
(km2)
Enforcement
247
1,156,810
Environmental Education
176
801,218
Biological Inventory
152
701,676
Recuperation of Degraded Areas
144
678,291
Creation of Mosaics/Corridors
135
815,250
Fostering Sustainable Use
116
746,406
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Area
97
437,273
Socio-anthropological Studies
82
422,708
Studies on the Physical Environment
64
297,558
Recuperation of Endangered Species
57
207,879
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
44
207,217
Creation of Protected Area – undefined category
25
164,562
Management of Biological Resources
23
49,052
30
Figure 2.4.1 – Map of the Priority Areas of the Amazon Biome
31
3. Pantanal Biome
3.1. Background
The Pantanal covers approximately 140,000 km2 of the Upper Paraguai River
Watershed (including the Paraguai river tributaries) and is characterized as one of the
largest continuous wetlands of the planet. The Pantanal was recognized as National
Heritage by the 1988 Constitution, as Wetlands of International Importance by the
Ramsar Convention, and as Biosphere Reserve and World Natural Heritage by
UNESCO. However, only 2.5% of the Upper Paraguai River Watershed is officially
under protection as federal and state protected areas and private reserves (Harris et al.,
2005).
Vegetation in the Pantanal is heterogeneous and influenced mainly by the
Cerrado, but also includes elements from the Amazon Forest, Chaco, and Atlantic
Forest. This characteristic, together with the different soil types and flood regimes, is
responsible for the large variety of vegetation formations and for the heterogeneity of
the landscape, which harbors rich aquatic and terrestrial biota (Pott and Adámoli, 1999).
The main ecological factor determining patterns and processes in the Pantanal is the
flooding regime, (Junk and Silva, 1999; Oliveira and Calheiros, 2000), with pulses
amplitude varying between two and five meters, and lasting from three to six months.
Species diversity is higher in the south than in the north of the biome, and there
is practically no endemism, probably due to the recent history of the biome. However,
the high abundance of wildlife should be noted. Approximately 124 mammal species
occur in the Pantanal, and the biome notably harbors the largest known populations of
pampas deer, marsh deer, jaguar, and giant river otter (Alho and Lacher Jr., 1991;
Mourão et al., 2000; Tomas et al., 2000; Sanderson et al., 2002). Currently, 463 bird
species are known to this biome (Mittermeier et al., 2003; Tubelis and Tomas, 2003);
117 of these figure in endangered species lists, and 130 are migratory species flying in
from the south of the country, from the northern hemisphere, or from the Atlantic Forest
(Antas, 1994; Nunes and Tomás, 2004). Additionally, 41 species of amphibians, 177
species of reptiles (Médri and Mourão, 2004), and over 260 fish species (Britski et al.,
1999) have already been recorded in the Pantanal.
Among the various threats to the conservation of biodiversity in the Pantanal,
deforestation is notable, occurring both on the floodplain and on the adjacent plateau,
resulting in severe erosive processes that cause deposition of sediments in the
depressions and alter the water flow patterns and hydrological regimes (Harris et al.,
2005). Other threats to the conservation of the ecosystems and ecological processes of
the Pantanal are the infrastructure projects (particularly hydroelectric power plants,
waterways, and mining ventures), hunting, alien invasive species, and pollution
originated from pesticide use in agricultural areas along the headwaters of the major
rivers of the floodplain (Alho et al., 1988).
3.2. Technical Meetings and data processing
The first Technical Meeting was held from July 12 to 14, 2006 in Brasília/DF, in
partnership with IBAMA-COZAM, and with support from Rede Cerrado, Rede
Pantanal, CI, TNC, and WWF. This meeting had 108 participants, mostly researchers
32
connected to universities or research institutions, third-sector organizations, and federal
and state governmental agencies (see list of participants in annex 11.7.2).
Discussions in this first technical meeting focused the conservation targets to be
included in the analyses of the Systematic Conservation Planning, selected based on the
analysis of a previously prepared list of endemic and threatened species of the biome.
The participants were organized in thematic groups, with the objective of listing
conservation targets and discussing the available databases to be included in the
analysis. Seven thematic working groups were formed: Fishes, Reptiles, Birds,
Mammals, Flora, Environmental Units and Environmental Services, and Socioenvironmental Aspects. Given the heterogeneity of the discussed themes, the
methodology and results varied among working groups. The participant researchers
discussed each of the listed species, and were allowed to include new taxa according to
personal knowledge. For each species, a conservation goal was discussed according to
its area of occurrence, a weight according to the species’ vulnerability, and the
databases that could be used to define its distribution.
A second technical meeting was held in Brasília on October 10 and 11, 2006,
with support from the same institutions mentioned above, and with the objective to
revise the databases that supported the analyses, as well as to redefine conservation
targets to some species (see list of participants in annex 11.7.3).
3.2.1. Definition of Conservation Targets
Environmental Units
A total of 18 Environmental Unit targets were identified based on the division of
the “pantanais” according to Hamilton et al.(1996) for areas subject to flooding, and
based on the land system (Silva et al., 2006) for plateau areas included in the biome.
Processes in aquatic ecosystems
Three systems considered important for maintaining aquatic biodiversity were
identified, considering rare and threatened fish species as indicators.
Species
A total of 13 rare and/or threatened plant species were identified as indicators;
while the following indicators were identified for wildlife: 50 bird species, 25 mammal
species, 47 reptile species, and 12 amphibian species. Most of these were selected in
conjunction with the selection of the Cerrado targets, given the strong association
between the two biomes (Cerrado and Pantanal).
An important step that counted with the fundamental participation of researchers
was the compilation of the available databases for all listed targets, which also involved
researchers that could not participate in the technical meeting, but contributed
significantly to the process by providing lists of points of occurrence for the selected
target species. The following databases were provided by researchers and/or research
institutions, and used for the analyses:
•
Geographical distribution of threatened species in the Pantanal, produced by
experts for the Threatened Wildlife Red Book and provided by Fundação
Biodiversitas;
•
Pantanal Biodiversity Databases from Conservation International – Brazil.
The following databases were used specifically for the thematic groups selected
for the analysis:
33
•
Amphibians: Herpetological Collection (UnB); Zoology Museum (USP);
Global Amphibian Assessment (IUCN, CI and NatureServe, 2006).
•
Birds: Professor Miguel Marini and collaborators, based on collection
records from UnB, Zoology Museum (USP), MPEG, UFMG; Professor Luis
Fábio da Silveira (USP); Dr. Paulo de Tarso Zuquim Antas; Alessandro
Pacheco Nunes (Fundação Pantanal and Ciência/EMBRAPA Pantanal)
•
Mammals: primates database from IBAMA – CPB; distribution of small
mammals provided by Dr. Ana Paula Carmignotto (USP); giant anteater
distribution by Dr. Guilherme Miranda (Federal Police); geographical
distribution of mammal target species of the Pantanal by Dr. Walfrido
Tomás and Dr. Guilherme Mourão (EMBRAPA Pantanal);
•
Reptiles: Herpetological Collection (UnB); Collection of the USP Zoology
Museum; Dr. Cristiano Nogueira (USP/CI); Professor Christine Strussmann
(UFMT).
3.2.2. Definition of Conservation Goals
The conservation goals and weights were defined by researchers taking into
account the distribution and vulnerability of each species, from a scale between 20%
and 100% of the targets for goals, and from 1 to 4 for weights. The species selected as
targets were analyzed individually concerning distribution scope (broad, endemic,
limited) and shape (set of punctual occurrences, minimum convex polygon), with lower
goals given to species of broad distribution and higher goals to species of restricted
distribution, reaching 100% of the target in those cases of species known exclusively to
one location. The critically endangered species and those known to only one location
were given weight 4, and smaller weights were attributed to species in lower threat
categories and/or with broader distribution (see list of conservation targets and goals in
annex 11.10.2).
As defined by the methodology applied for this assessment, a map of UPs was
produced, composed by a grid of 20 thousand-hectare hexagons, covering the entire area
of the Pantanal. The full protection protected areas were included as UPs in the grid,
and internal or intercepting hexagons had their limits dissolved to respect the shape of
the protected area.
The maps of species distribution with occurrences represented by dots were
converted to polygons for processing, according to criteria defined in both technical
meetings. Later, each distribution map was compared with the map of remnants of
Cerrado native vegetation (prepared by a team led by Dr. João Villa) to obtain the actual
area size with original vegetation available to each species in the biome and in each UP.
The maps and information produced were used for preparing the biological
importance map, which supported the definition of Priority Areas during the regional
workshop.
The following databases on federal and state protected areas were used:
DAP/MMA database, CI database, and Map of the Mato Grosso State Protected Areas
(SEMA/MT).
Technical Team
Marcos Reis Rosa (MMA – General Technical Coordinator); Mauro Oliveira Pires
(NCP/MMA – General Coordinator for the Cerrado and Pantanal Biomes); Paula Hanna
34
Valdujo (NCP/MMA – Technical Coordinator for the Cerrado and Pantanal Biomes);
Adriana Niemeyer Pires Ferreira (SBF/MMA); Adriana Panhol Bayma (NCP/MMA);
Avay Miranda Junior (NCP/MMA); Bráulio F. S. Dias (DCBio/MMA); Débora Leite
Silvano (NCP/MMA); Guilherme Déstro (COZAM/IBAMA); Gustavo de Oliveira
Silva (MMA); Isabel Belloni Schmidt (IBAMA/DIREF); Jailton Dias
(COZAM/IBAMA); Laura Tillmann Viana (NCP/MMA); Leandro Baumgarten
(NAPMA/MMA); Paulo Kageyama (DCBio/MMA).
Figure 3.2.1. – Biological Importance Map of the
Pantanal Biome.
3.3. Regional Workshop
The Pantanal Regional Workshop was held in Campo Grande from December 6
to 8, 2006, with support from IBAMA-COZAM and Rede Pantanal.
This workshop had a total of 100 participants, with representatives from the state
and federal government, researchers from universities and research institutions, nongovernmental sector, social movements, indigenous groups, quilombolas and other
traditional communities, and from the business sector (see list of participants in annex
11.8.4).
For discussions, the participants were organized in working groups by state, as
follows: (1) Pantanal of Mato Grosso; (2) Pantanal of Mato Grosso do Sul; and (3)
35
Cerrado of Mato Grosso do Sul. The third group was formed at the request of the
participants of the Cerrado regional workshop.
A preparatory meeting was also held with representatives of indigenous groups,
quilombola communities, and other traditional communities, to ensure their better
understanding of the process and objectives of updating the Priority Areas.
Each regional working group met in a room equipped with a datashow and two
computers: one to access the cartographic databases and to produce the Priority Areas
map, and another to input information into the database containing files for each priority
area.
The regional workshop discussions used the following databases to prepare the
final Priority Areas map:
•
Preliminary map of priority areas produced by the coordination team based
on the analysis result produced by the software, compared with the Brazilian
Biomes Vegetation Cover Map (MMA, 2007) and with a Digital Landscape
Model;
•
Biological Importance Map, produced by the coordination team according to
databases provided by collaborating researchers;
•
Brazilian Biomes Vegetation Cover Map (MMA, 2007);
•
Satellite images obtained from GoogleEarth;
•
Digital Landscape Model from NASA, with 90m definition; and
•
Map of local initiatives of Cerrado use and conservation supported by
projects (SDS/MMA, PPP/ECOS – ISPN, Solidary Commercialization
Network [Rede de Comercialização Solidária], North of Minas Gerais
Alternative Agriculture Center [Centro de Agricultura Alternativa do Norte
de Minas], and DISAM/IBAMA).
Technical Team and collaborators
Mauro Pires (NCP/MMA - General Coordinator for the Cerrado Biome); Paula Hanna
Valdujo (NCP/MMA - Technical Coordinator for the Cerrado Biome); Adriana Panhol
Bayma (NCP/MMA - Facilitator); Gustavo Oliveira (SBF/MMA – Logistics); Giovana
Bottura (COZAM/IBAMA - Facilitator); Ana Elisa Bacellar Schittini
(COZAM/IBAMA - Geoprocessing); Guilherme Déstro (COZAM/IBAMA Geoprocessing); Avaí Miranda (NCP/MMA - Support); Cleide Noêmia Amador de
Souza (Pantanal Program /MMA – Support); Gloria Spezia (SBF/MMA – Logistics);
Juliana Bragança (UnB – Logistics); Camila Bastianon (UnB – Logistics); Elisa
Coutinho (UnB – Logistics); Geraldo Lucatelli Dória de Araújo Junior (ANA Geoprocessing); Sérgio Ricardo Travassos da Rocha – (SBF/MMA - Facilitator);
Marcos da Silva Alves (SBF/MMA – Logistics).
3.4. Results
At the end of the updating process 50 priority areas were indicated for the
Pantanal, of which five are already protected and 45 are new indications, representing a
substantial increase in comparison to the 19 areas proposed in 1998 (see list of Priority
Areas for the Pantanal Biome in annex 11.9.2). The total extension of the priority areas
36
also increased by more than 32% in the target area (from 59,866 to 79,143 km2).
Considering only the new areas, the most notable difference regarding the proportion of
importance categories was the reduction of the number of areas considered
insufficiently known, and a better balance between the number of areas classified as
being of high and very high importance. The predominance of areas qualified as being
of extreme importance, however, was maintained. Considering both the new and already
protected areas as a group, there was an increase in the proportion of areas considered as
being of extremely high importance, from 47% to 52%.
The results of the process to update the priority areas are presented below:
comparison of the frequency of biological importance classes among themselves and
between the 1998 and 2006 identification processes (Table 3.4.1); comparison of the
frequency of urgency for action classes (Table 3.4.2); distribution of the main action
indicated to each of the identified areas (Table 3.4.3); distribution of all actions
indicated for each of the identified areas (Table 3.4.4); and the final map of the Priority
Areas of the Pantanal Biome (Figure 3.4.1 and insert to this publication).
Table 3.4.1: Distribution of the number and extension of the priority areas for the Pantanal Biome, by category of
Biological Importance, as defined in the 1998 and 2006 priority-setting processes.
New 2006
Protected 2006
Total 1998
Biological
Importance
High
Very High
Extremely High
Insufficiently
Known
TOTAL
Number
of Areas
11
12
21
Area
(km2)
17,150
19,227
39,447
1
45
3,319
79,143
%
22
24
50
4
Number
of Areas
0
0
5
Area
(km2)
0
0
4,419
0
5
0
4,419
%
0
0
100
0
Number
of Areas
4
3
9
Area
(km2)
7,822
11,107
18,695
3
19
22,242
59,866
%
13
19
31
37
Table 3.4.2 – Distribution of the number and extension of the priority areas for the Pantanal Biome, by Priority for
Action class, as defined in the 2006 updating process.
New 2006
Protected 2006
Total 2006
Priority for
Action
High
Very High
Extremely High
TOTAL
Number
of Areas
11
12
22
45
Area
(km2)
17,750
30,380
31,013
79,143
%
22
38
39
Number
of Areas
0
0
5
5
Area
(km2)
0
0
4,419
4,419
%
0
0
100
Number
of Areas
11
12
27
50
Area
(km2)
17,750
30,380
35,432
83,562
%
21
36
42
Table 3.4.3: Distribution of the main priority action indicated to the priority areas of the
Pantanal Biome.
Type of Priority Action
Biological Inventory
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
Recuperation of Degraded Areas
Creation of Protected Area (Undefined Category)
Fostering Sustainable Use
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Area
Other
Creation of a Mosaic/Corridor
Number of Areas
8
6
9
8
5
5
2
2
Area (km2)
17,439
14,305
12,172
10,031
9,938
8,648
5,104
1,507
Percent of
the BIOME
31.20
25.79
22.07
6.62
6.56
5.71
3.37
0.99
37
NEW AREAS TOTAL
Areas Already under Protection
TOTAL
Total Area of the BIOME
45
5
50
79,143
4,419
83,562
151,487
52.24
2.92
55.16
Table 3.4.4: Distribution of all actions indicated for the priority areas of the Pantanal
Biome.
Indicated Actions
Biological Inventory
Enforcement
Socio-anthropological studies
Fostering Sustainable Use
Environmental Education
Studies on the Physical Environment
Recuperation of Degraded Areas
Creation of Mosaic/Corridor
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
Creation of Protected Area (Undefined Category)
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Area
Biological Resources Management
Number of Areas
28
18
15
13
14
12
15
10
6
8
5
3
Area (km2)
47,269
39,072
33,437
29,054
27,372
22,458
18,170
17,870
14,305
10,031
8,648
2,515
38
Figure 3.4.1 – Map of the Priority Areas of the Pantanal Biome.
39
4. Cerrado Biome
4.1. Background
The Cerrado is the second largest Brazilian biome, covering 21% of the national
territory. It comprises the group of ecosystems that occur in Central Brazil: savannas,
forests, grasslands, wet areas, and gallery forests (Eiten, 1977; Ribeiro et al., 1981). The
Cerrado contains high species richness, making this biome the most diverse tropical
savanna in the world: herbs, bushes, trees, epiphytes and lianas add up to over 7,000
species (Mendonça et al., 1998), 44% of which are endemic. The large variety of
habitats results in a notable alternation of species among different phytophysiognomies
(Klink and Machado, 2005). At least 199 species of mammals are known to the Cerrado
(Redford and Fonseca, 1986; Klink and Machado, 2005), and the rich bird fauna
comprises at least 837 species. The number of fish species (1,200), reptile species (180)
and amphibian species (150) are also high. The number of endemic fish species is yet
unknown, but the number of endemic species is high for amphibians and reptiles: 28%
and 17%, respectively (Fonseca et al., 1996; Fundação Pro-Natureza et al., 1999;
Aguiar, 2000; Colli et al., 2002; Marinho-Filho et al., 2002; Oliveira and Marquis,
2002; Aguiar et al., 2004).
Concerning social diversity, the Cerrado is home to various indigenous,
traditional, and quilombola communities, all of which possess elements of their culture
strongly associated to the land and other natural resources of the biome. Although there
is no broad inventory of these communities, except for indigenous peoples, it is known
that they are concentrated in places that still hold significant remnants of Cerrado
vegetation, which brings out the importance of considering their roles and requirements
for environmental conservation. There are 93 indigenous lands in the biome, adding up
to approximately 11 million hectares (5.4% of the biome). Their land tenure status
varies, and the greater concentration of these areas is located in the states of Maranhão
and Mato Grosso. There are also officially recognized quilombola lands, such as the
Kalunga area, located in northeastern Goiás. Traditional communities such as the
geraizeiros, located between Minas Gerais and Bahia, and in the babassu forests in the
transition zone between Cerrado and Amazon Forest, generally face growing difficulties
to access natural resources, given the advance of the agricultural frontier and increasing
price of land. Their territories, although not recognized, are fundamental to form
biological corridors when associated to protected areas, and also for the conservation of
water resources and natural landscape.
Despite the Cerrado’s high biodiversity and high social diversity, attention to the
conservation of this biome has been low, resulting in only 2.2% of the biome being
under legal protection in full protection protected areas, and estimates indicate that at
least 20% of the endemic and threatened species are not protected by the existing parks
and reserves (Machado et al., 2004a). Approximately half of the original 2 million km2
of the Cerrado were transformed in planted pastures, annual crops and other types of
land use, and the destruction of the Cerrado ecosystems continues at an accelerated pace
(Klink and Machado, 2005). A recent study found that 55% of the Cerrado has already
been deforested or transformed by human action (Machado et al., 2004), which is
equivalent to 880,000 km2, i.e., almost three times the deforested area of the Brazilian
Amazon. The annual deforestation rate is also higher in the Cerrado: between 1970 and
1975, the average deforestation rate in the biome was 40,000 km2 per year (Klink and
Moreira, 2002).
40
These changes in land use in the Cerrado resulted in severe environmental
damages, such as ecosystem degradation, habitat fragmentation, extinction of species,
invasion of alien species, soil erosion, pollution of aquifers, alteration in fire regimes,
unbalance in the carbon cycle, and possibly regional climate changes. The degradation
of soil and native ecosystems and the dispersion of alien species are the highest and
broader threats to biodiversity. Erosion caused by deficient soil management can result
in the loss of 130 ton/ha/year (Goedert, 1990). Agricultural practices in the Cerrado
include extensive use of fertilizers and lime (Müller, 2003), which pollute streams and
rivers. Tansey et al. (2004) estimated that 67% of the area burned in Brazil during the
year 2000 were located in the Cerrado. Although fire is part of the Cerrado natural
dynamics, frequent burning negatively affect the establishment of trees and bushes
(Hoffmann and Moreira, 2002), in addition to releasing carbon dioxide (CO2) and other
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere (Krug et al., 2002).
As a result of the outstanding agricultural expansion and intense local
exploitation of native products, at least 137 animal species of the Cerrado are threatened
with extinction (Fundação Biodiversitas, 2003; Hilton-Taylor, 2004). The accelerated
destruction of native Cerrado formations combined with the high diversity of endemic
species determined the inclusion of the Cerrado among the global biodiversity hotspots
(Myers et al., 2000; Silva and Bates, 2002)
4.2. Technical Meetings and data processing
The first technical meeting was held from July 12 to 14, 2006, in Brasília, DF, in
partnership with IBAMA-COZAM and with support from Rede Cerrado, Rede
Pantanal, CI, TNC, and WWF. A total of 108 people participated in this first technical
meeting, most of which researchers from universities and research institutions, nongovernmental organizations, and the federal and state government (see list of
participants in annex 11.7.2).
This first technical meeting discussed the conservation targets to be included in
the analyses of the Systematic Conservation Planning, through the evaluation of a
previously prepared list of endemic and threatened species of the biome. Participants
were organized into thematic groups, with the objective of listing conservation targets
and discussing the available databases to be included in the analysis. Seven thematic
discussion groups were formed: Fishes, Reptiles, Birds, Mammals, Flora,
Environmental Units and Environmental Services, and Socio-Environmental Aspects.
Given the heterogeneity of themes, methodology and results varied somewhat among
discussion groups. The participant researchers discussed each of the listed species, and
were given the opportunity to include new taxa according to personal knowledge. A
conservation goal was discussed for each species according to its area of occurrence,
and a weight was defined according to its vulnerability. Additionally, the databases that
could be used to define geographical distribution were also discussed for each species.
The second technical meeting was also held in Brasília, on October 10 and 11,
2006, with support from the same institutions listed above, with the objective of
revising the databases that informed the analyses, and redefining the conservation goals
for some species (see the list of participants in annex 11.7.3).
4.2.1. Definition of Conservation Targets
Environmental Units
41
A total of 118 units were produced based on the Land Systems map (Silva et al.,
2006) overlapped with the map of sub-watersheds provided by ANA. During the
technical meeting, the best base to represent environmental units was discussed at
length, and the participants proposed the use of a geology map overlapped with the
Brazilian Biomes Vegetation Cover Map (MMA, 2007). However, the vegetation
classification was not available in time; so instead, the Land Systems map was used,
produced based on the classification proposed by Cochrane et al. (1985), which
considers as a land system a group of areas presenting recurrent patterns of climate,
landscape, and soils.
Environmental Services
A total of 31 units were identified with the potential to recharge aquifers and
maintain the perenniality of rivers, based on the analysis of the IBGE map at the
1:1,000,000 scale (IBGE, 2001), under guidance of Dr, Jamilo Thomé Filho (CPRM).
However, it was not possible to obtain other databases on environmental services for the
biome.
Processes in aquatic ecosystems
A total of 20 systems were considered important for maintaining aquatic
biodiversity, using rare and threatened fish species as indicators, and the ANA
Watersheds database.
Species
A total of 443 rare and/or threatened plant species from the Cerrado were
considered for the analysis. Concerning wildlife, 56 bird species, 70 mammal species,
127 reptile species, 80 amphibian species, and 30 fish species were considered, all
threatened and/or endemic to the Cerrado, according to the National List of the
Brazilian Threatened Fauna (MMA, 2003) and the Red List of Threatened Species
(IUCN, 2005). The selection of target endemic species was based on the knowledge of
the participant researchers.
The databases available for all listed targets were compiled with the fundamental
participation of researchers, and the contribution of people who could not participate in
the technical meeting, but collaborated significantly to the process by providing lists of
points of occurrence of the selected target species. The following databases were
provided by researchers and/or research institutions and used for the analyses:
•
Geographical distribution of threatened species of the Cerrado, prepared by
experts for the Threatened Wildlife Red Book and provided by Fundação
Biodiversitas;
•
Biodiversity database provided by CI – Brazil.
The following databases were used for the analyses of the thematic groups:
•
Amphibians: geographical distribution of the amphibian target species of the
Cerrado of the UnB Herpetological Collection; USP Zoology Museum
database; Global Amphibian Assessment database (IUCN, CI, and
NatureServe, 2006).
•
Birds: geographical distribution of Cerrado bird target species, prepared by
Prof. Miguel Marini and collaborators based on the collections of UnB, USP
Zoology Museum, MPEG, and UFMG; geographical distribution of Cerrado
bird target species prepared by Dr. Adriani Hass, Vivian Braz (UnB) and
42
collaborators, Prof. Luis Fábio da Silveira (USP), Leonardo Lopes (UFMG),
Dr. Paulo de Tarso Zuquim Antas, and Dr. Fábio Olmos.
•
Mammals: geographical distribution of Primates of the IBAMA-CPB
database; and databases provided by Dr. Ana Paula Carmignotto (USP) and
Dr. Guilherme Miranda (Federal Police).
•
Reptiles: geographical distribution of the Cerrado reptile target species of the
UnB Herpetological Collection, USP Zoology Museum and IBAMA-RAN;
databases provided by Dr. Cristiano Nogueira (USP/CI), Dr. Larissa Barreto
(UFMA), and researcher Adriano de Lima (MNRJ).
4.2.2. Definition of Conservation Goals
The conservation goals and weights were defined by researchers considering the
distribution scope and vulnerability of each species, on a scale from 20% to 100% of the
target for goals, and from 1 to 4 for weights. The species selected as targets were
individually analyzed concerning distribution scope (broad, endemic, limited) and shape
(set of punctual occurrences, minimum convex polygon), with smaller goals given to
species of broad distribution and larger goals to species of limited distribution, reaching
100% of the target in those cases of species known exclusively to one location. The
critically endangered species and those known to only one location were given weight 4,
and smaller weights were attributed to species in lower threat categories and/or with
broader distribution (see list of conservation targets and goals in annex 11.10.3).
As defined by the methodology applied for this assessment, a map of UPs was
produced, composed by a grid of 20-thousand-hectare hexagons, covering the entire
area of the Cerrado. The full protection protected areas were included as UPs in the
grid, and internal or intercepting hexagons had their limits dissolved to respect the shape
of the protected area.
The maps of species distribution with occurrences represented by dots were
converted to polygons for processing, according to criteria defined in both technical
meetings. Later, each distribution map was compared with the Brazilian Biomes
Vegetation Cover Map (MMA, 2007) to obtain the size of the area with original
vegetation available for each species in the biome and in each UP.
The maps and information produced were used for preparing the biological
importance map, which supported the definition of Priority Areas during the regional
workshop.
The following databases on federal and state protected areas were used:
DAP/SBF/MMA database; CI database; updated database on Tocantins protected areas
and information for post selection provided by SEPLAN – TO; Map of the Mato Grosso
State Protected Areas provided by SEMA/MT.
Technical Team
Marcos Reis Rosa (MMA – General Technical Coordinator); Mauro Oliveira Pires
(NCP/MMA – General Coordinator for the Cerrado and Pantanal Biomes); Paula Hanna
Valdujo (NCP/MMA – Technical Coordinator for the Cerrado and Pantanal Biomes);
Adriana Niemeyer Pires Ferreira (SBF/MMA); Adriana Panhol Bayma (NCP/MMA);
Avay Miranda Junior (NCP/MMA); Bráulio F. S. Dias (DCBio/MMA); Débora Leite
Silvano (NCP/MMA); Guilherme Déstro (COZAM/IBAMA); Gustavo de Oliveira
Silva (MMA); Isabel Belloni Schmidt (IBAMA/DIREF); Jailton Dias
43
(COZAM/IBAMA); Laura Tillmann Viana (NCP/MMA); Leandro Baumgarten
(NAPMA/MMA); Paulo Kageyama (DCBio/MMA).
Figure 4.2.1 – Map of Biological Importance for the Cerrado Biome.
4.3. Regional Workshops
The Cerrado Regional Workshop was held in Brasília from November 20 to 23,
2006, with support from IBAMA-COZAM. The meeting had 138 participants, with
representatives from the state and federal government, non-governmental organizations,
social movements, traditional communities, researchers, and from the production sector
(see list of participants in annex 11.8.5).
The participants were organized in groups by state for the discussions, as
follows: (1) Maranhão and Piauí; (2) Bahia and Tocantins; (3) Goiás and Federal
District; (4) Mato Grosso and Mato Grosso do Sul; (5) Minas Gerais; (6) São Paulo and
Paraná. The representatives of indigenous communities chose to form a separate group
44
to define a general directive to address priority setting and to define priority actions in
indigenous lands.
Each regional working group gathered in a room equipped with a datashow and
two computers: one for accessing the cartographic databases and producing the Priority
Areas map, and the other for entering information into a database containing files for
each priority area.
The Regional Workshop based the preparation of the final Priority Areas map on
the following databases:
•
Preliminary priority areas map produced by the coordination team based on
the analysis results produced by the software, overlapped with the Brazilian
Biomes Vegetation Cover Map (MMA, 2007) and with the Digital
Landscape Model;
•
Biological Importance Map;
•
Brazilian Biomes Vegetation Cover Map (MMA, 2007);
•
Satellite images obtained from GoogleEarth;
•
NASA’s Digital Landscape Model with 90m definition;
•
Map of the local project-supported initiatives for the use and conservation of
the Cerrado (SDS/MMA, PPP/ECOS – ISPN, Rede de Comercialização
Solidária, Centro de Agricultura Alternativa do Norte de Minas,
DISAM/IBAMA).
Technical Team and collaborators
Marcos Reis Rosa (SBF/MMA – General Technical Coordinator); Mauro Pires
(NCP/MMA – General Coordinator for the Cerrado and Pantanal Biomes); Paula Hanna
Valdujo (NCP/MMA – Technical Coordinator for the Cerrado and Pantanal Biomes);
Paulo Kageyama (DCBio/MMA - Coordinator); Bráulio Dias (DCBio/MMA Coordinator); Débora Silvano (NCP/MMA – Coordinator); Adriana Panhol Bayma
(NCP/MMA – Facilitator); Gustavo Oliveira (SBF/MMA – Logistics); Giovana Bottura
(COZAM/IBAMA - Facilitator); Ana Elisa Bacellar Schittini (COZAM/IBAMA Geoprocessing); Jailton Dias (COZAM/IBAMA - Geoprocessing); Guilherme Déstro
(COZAM/IBAMA - Geoprocessing); Avaí Miranda (NCP/MMA – Logistics); Gloria
Spezia (SBF/MMA- Logistics); Fernanda Carvalho (SBF/MMA - Facilitator); Danielle
Lima da Cunha Nunes (SBF/MMA – Logistics); Anselmo Cristiano de Oliveira
(ProVárzea/IBAMA - Facilitator); Daniela Oliveira (ARPA/MMA - Facilitator); Juliana
Bragança (Voluntary collaborator – Logistics); Camila Bastianon (UnB – Logistics);
Crizanto Brito de Carvalho (COZAM/IBAMA - Geoprocessing); Carlos Eduardo
Ribeiro Cândido (Voluntary collaborator - Logistics); William Souza de Paula
(Voluntary collaborator - Logistics); Elisa Coutinho (Voluntary collaborator Logistics); Ricardo Campos da Nóbrega (DIREC/IBAMA - Geoprocessing); Marcos da
Silva Alves (SBF/MMA – Logistics).
4.4. Results
The review indicated 431 priority areas in the Cerrado, 181 of which are already
under protection and 250 are new areas, which represent a substantial increase
compared to the 68 priority areas proposed in 1998 (Table 4.4.1) (see list of Priority
45
Areas for the Cerrado Biome in annex 11.9.3). The review also resulted in a 37%
increase in the total extension of priority areas (from 686,668 km2 to 939,752 km2).
The results of the priority areas update are presented below: comparison of the
frequency of biological importance classes among themselves and between the 1998
and 2006 identification processes (Table 4.4.1); comparison of the frequency of urgency
for action classes (Table 4.4.2); distribution of the main action indicated to each of the
identified areas (Table 4.4.3); distribution of all actions indicated to each of the
identified areas (Table 4.4.4); and the final map of the Priority Areas for the Cerrado
Biome (Figure 4.4.1 and insert to this publication).
Table 4.4.1: Distribution of the number and extension of priority areas of the Cerrado Biome, by Biological Importance
category, in the 1998 and 2006 identification processes.
New 2006
Protected 2006
Total 1998
Biological
Importance
High
Very High
Extremely High
Insufficiently
Known
TOTAL
Number
of Areas
46
75
122
Area (km2)
144,720
221,771
395,334
%
19
29
51
7
250
9,383
771,209
1
Number
of Areas
51
10
115
Area
(km2)
57,544
12,451
93,978
5
181
4,571
168,544
%
34
7
56
3
Number
of Areas
8
13
38
Area
(km2)
27,289
110,147
426,849
9
68
122,383
686,668
%
4
16
62
18
Table 4.4.2 – Distribution of the number and extension of priority areas of the Cerrado Biome, by Priority for Action
class, as defined in the 2006 identification process.
New 2006
Protected 2006
Total 2006
Priority
for Action
High
Very High
Extremely High
TOTAL
Number
of Areas
56
86
108
250
Area (km2)
101,790
273,274
396,145
771,209
%
13
35
51
Number
of Areas
112
37
32
181
Area
(km2)
85,716
44,904
37,923
168,544
%
51
27
23
Number
of Areas
168
123
140
431
Area
(km2)
187,506
318,178
434,068
939,752
Table 4.4.3: Distribution of the main priority action indicated to the priority areas of the
Cerrado Biome.
Type of Priority Area
Creation of Protected Area – Undefined
Category
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
Recuperation of Degraded Areas
Creation of Mosaic/Corridor
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Areas
Fostering Sustainable Use
Biological Inventory
No Information
Other
Territorial Planning and Regularization
Environmental Education
NEW AREAS TOTAL
Areas already under protection
Number
of Areas
Area (km2)
Percent of
the
BIOME
39
51
42
45
30
11
13
11
2
2
4
250
181
171,095
139,497
134,472
124,833
105,911
27,757
24,621
16,660
15,521
9,015
1,827
771,209
168,544
8.34
6.80
6.55
6.08
5.16
1.35
1.20
0.81
0.76
0.44
0.09
37.58
8.21
46
%
20
34
46
TOTAL
Total area of the Biome
431
939,752
2,052,041
45.80
Table 4.4.4: Distribution of all actions indicated to the priority areas of the Cerrado
Biome.
Number of
Proposed Actions
Areas
Area (km2)
Biological Inventory
160
557,242
Recuperation of Degraded Areas
147
465,512
Environmental Education
118
449,747
Fostering Sustainable Use
99
362,762
Enforcement
102
340,591
Studies on the Physical Environment
98
323,812
Creation of Mosaic/Corridor
97
317,922
Creation of Protected Area – Undefined Category
39
171,095
Socio-anthropological Studies
47
145,290
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
51
139,497
Creation of Sustainable Use Protection Area
30
105,911
Recuperation of Threatened Species
20
77,560
Management of Biological Resources
17
41,000
47
Figure 4.4.1 – Map of Priority Areas for the Cerrado Biome
48
5. Caatinga Biome
5.1. Background
The Caatinga is the only exclusively Brazilian biome, encompassing an area of
approximately 734,478 km2, equivalent to about 11% of the national territory (IBGE,
1993). The biome covers mainly the northeastern portion of Brazil, and extends into the
northern portion of Minas Gerais state. The Caatinga is characterized by the steppesavanna vegetation, long dry season (Eiten, 1982), and irregular rain regime (AndradeLima, 1981). The annual rainfall average varies between 400mm and 600mm
(Ab’Saber, 1977), contributing to the intermittent and seasonal characteristic of most
rivers in the region (Rosa et al., 2003), which also present limited water volume,
insufficient for irrigation.
Even though the Caatinga is a semi-arid region, it is extremely heterogeneous,
with 12 recognized vegetation types prompting particular attention given their
fascinating and varied examples of adaptation to semi-arid habitats. Some of its most
notable features are the temporary lagoons or wetlands, mountainous refuges, and
permanent rivers such as the São Francisco river (MMA, 2003).
The Caatinga had previously been described as a poor region, with few species
(Rizzini, 1963; Willig and Mares, 1989) and low endemism rate (Sick, 1965; Haffer,
1985; Vanzolini, 1974, 1976; Mares et al., 1981). However, recent studies increased the
list of known species for several groups in the region (Silva and Oren, 1997),
particularly woody plants (Prado 1991, 2003), reptiles (Rodrigues, 1984, 1987, 1988,
1996), birds (Silva et al., 2003; Cracraft, 1985; Rizzini, 1997), and mammals (Oliveira
et al., 2003), also revealing the importance of this region as an area of endemism for
these groups. Estimates have recorded at least 932 plant species in the region, 318 of
which are endemic. The same is true for other groups such as birds, with 348 recorded
species, of which 15 species and 45 subspecies are endemic. Two mammal species were
described as endemic to this biome (Oliveira et al., 2003). Two areas of dune
formations in the Middle São Francisco River region (dune fields of Xique-Xique and
Santo Inácio, and dune fields of Casanova) are notable for concentrating unique groups
of endemic reptile species. For example, of the 41 lizard and amphisbaenian species
recorded for the set of dune fields, approximately 40% are endemic. Additionally, four
genera are also exclusive to the area.
Although many species were described in the region (Silva and Oren, 1997),
scientific knowledge on the Caatinga is still limited (MMA, 1998), given the small
number of inventories conducted in the region in comparison to the other biomes
(MMA, 2005).
Its unique position among the Brazilian biomes was not enough to ensure to the
Caatinga the notability it deserves. On the contrary, the biome has always been placed
low in the list of priorities during discussions on public policies for biodiversity studies
and conservation in the country, as attested by the small number of protected areas
(Tabarelli and Vicente, 2002). In addition, the Caatinga is also one of the most
threatened biomes, and one of the most altered by human action, particularly
deforestation, with extensive degraded areas (MMA, 2002) and areas where the soil is
undergoing intense desertification process (Garda, 1996). Historically, agriculture in the
region of the Caatinga is itinerant, which resulted in a disorganized and high-impact
territorial occupancy, causing a significant reduction of biodiversity (MMA, 2002). In
1993, agriculture activities occupied almost 28% of the total Caatinga area (MMA,
49
1998), and recent estimates based on agriculture activities maps and road maps of the
Caatinga region indicated that the biome already has approximately 50% of its area
altered by human action (Castelletti et al., 2003).
Promoting the conservation of Caatinga biodiversity is not a simple action, since
great obstacles need to be overcome. The first one is the lack of inclusion of
environmental components in the regional development plans. Without this first step,
the subsequent governmental actions to improve life quality of the sertaneja1 population
have increasingly contributed to the destruction of biological resources. The second
obstacle is the lack of an efficient protected areas system in the region. In contrast to the
high percentage of altered areas, the Caatinga has a small number of protected areas
(Tabarelli e Vicente, 2002), with less than 5% of the biome protected under federal full
protection and sustainable use protected areas (IBAMA, 2004). The indigenous lands,
also important to maintain biodiversity in other regions of the country, occupy less than
1% of the biome (Souza, 2004). In addition to the small extension of Caatinga inside
protected areas, these do not represent well the endemic and threatened birds of the
biome (Souza, 2004).
The combination of lack of protection and continuous loss of biological
resources contributes to the extinction of species that are exclusive to the Caatinga, such
as the Spix macaw (Cyanopsitta spixii), extinct in nature at the end of 2000.
5.2. Technical Meetings and data processing
One technical meeting and three specific consultations were held with experts
from various institutions, to define conservation targets and goals.
The technical meeting was held from September 25 to 27, 2006, at the Vilarica
hotel in Recife, with the participation of 42 researchers (see list of participants in annex
11.7.4).
Experts were organized in groups according to the field of knowledge, resulting
in three working groups: fauna, flora, and landscape and sustainable use units.
Three specific consultations were held later, in Fortaleza, Recife and Salvador,
on October 26, November 1 and November 6, 2006, respectively. These consultations
had the objective of collecting information to prepare the conservation target
distribution maps. In total, 30 experts were invited: 13 for the Fortaleza meeting, 5 for
the Recife meeting, and 12 for the Salvador meeting (see list of participants in annex
11.7.5).
5.2.1. Definition of Conservation Targets
The biodiversity targets were defined by specialists invited to the Recife
technical meeting. Some species targets were excluded from the process due to the lack
of information on their distribution. This was a result of two main problems: lack of
information on the location where the presence of the species was recorded, or lack of
the geographical coordinates of the place of observation/collection.
Some species were added to the target list, according to the criteria of being a
threatened species, followed by its geographical distribution data.
1
Sertaneja: of or from the sertão (back-country, caatinga).
50
For each species, a “dot” distribution map was generated and, based on these, a
map of polygons was prepared. The geographical distribution of the biodiversity targets
was derived from the combination of the “dot” distribution maps with the map of the
Caatinga Geo-environmental Units (EMBRAPA, 2000), excluding the areas with high
degree of human interference. The Geoprocessing Wizard extension was used to
generate maps of potential species distribution.
A total of 713 targets were identified for the conservation of the Caatinga. Of
these, 480 are biodiversity targets (217 plant species, 12 invertebrate species, 12 fish
species, 132 amphibian and reptile species, 74 bird species, and 33 mammal species).
The sustainable use discussion group identified 89 targets. The distribution of
these targets was mapped separately in the Caatinga. Any species presenting disjoint
distribution was considered as two separate targets, so that the maintenance of
population viability could be considered in the definition of conservation goals.
The map of geo-environmental units (EMBRAPA, 2000) was considered in
addition to the biodiversity targets, resulting in a total of 136 targets. The map of geoenvironmental units is the result of a combination of information on natural resources
(relief, soils, vegetation, climate, and water resources) and socio-economic information
(production systems, land tenure structure, main products, and population density) of
the Caatinga.
Seven permanent rivers were selected in the Caatinga to be included as
conservation targets. These rivers were added to the list due to their extreme importance
for maintaining regional biodiversity. Later, a 5-km buffer on each bank was added to
the rivers shapefile, to simulate the area influenced by each river.
5.2.2. Definition of Conservation Goals
The Recife technical meeting defined goals for the sustainable use targets only;
all the other suggested targets did not have goals defined in that meeting.
The conservation goals for the biodiversity targets and geo-environmental units
were calculated according to the methodology proposed by Rodrigues et al. (2003). The
method applied by this analysis admits that species of limited distribution, being more
susceptible to extinction (Purvis et al., 2000), should have their entire range of
occurrence conserved in protected areas, while the taxa presenting broad distribution
should have at least 10% of their range of occurrence protected.
Species with a distribution smaller than 1,000 km2 should have 100% of their
distribution protected, while species with distribution above 250,000 km2 should have at
least 10% of their area protected. For species with intermediary distribution extension, a
logarithm was used for the calculations (methodology proposed by Rodrigues et al.,
2003), with the formula y= log(x) * (-37.53) + 212.6.
The river targets had goals set at 100% of their area, since the scarcity of water
resources in the biome endows them with a fundamental role in biodiversity
maintenance.
The conservation goals for the sustainable use targets were defined by the group
of experts during the technical meeting, held in Recife. Goals were set according to the
distribution area, in hectares, of the species managed by the regional population, and
considering the characteristics necessary for their maintenance (see list of conservation
targets and goals in annex 11.10.4).
51
5.2.3. Description of UPs and use of the natural formation databases
A map of Planning Units - UPs (6,500-ha hexagons) was generated for the
Caatinga, covering the entire region. The full protection protected areas were added to
this shapefile, and each was considered as an individual UP. The hexagons
encompassed by these protected areas had their limits dissolved to respect the protected
area’s limits.
This map was then overlapped with the Brazilian Biomes Vegetation Cover Map
(MMA, 2007), which is divided in 6 classes according to predominant vegetation type.
The categories corresponding to human alteration listed in the first class were excluded
from the analysis.
Technical Team and collaborators:
Marcos Reis Rosa – SBF/MMA; Enrique Riegelhaupt – Technical Consultant; José
Luiz Vieira Cruz Filho – APNE; Antônio Edson Guimarães Farias – NBC/SBF/MMA;
Francisco Barreto Campello – GEF Caatinga; Maria da Penha E. de Barros –
NBC/SBF/MMA; Paulo Magno Gabeto Martinez – NBC/SBF/MMA; Renato Prado –
MMA; Mônica Maria Bezerra Farias - Banco do Nordeste; Sônia Araújo Frota - Banco
do Nordeste.
Figure 5.2.1 – Map of Biological Importance for the Caatinga
Biome.
52
5.3. Regional Workshop
The regional workshop for the preparation of the final map of priority areas for
the Caatinga biome was held from December 13 to 16, 2006, in the Banco do Nordeste
Training Center, in Fortaleza. The event had the participation of 131 experts from 13
states (see list of participants in annex 11.8.6).
The participants were grouped by state for discussions, as follows:
•
Piauí
•
Ceará
•
Rio Grande do Norte and Paraíba
•
Pernambuco and Alagoas
•
Bahia, Minas Gerais, and Sergipe
To obtain a better characterization and assessment of the region, and to facilitate
discussions among participants in each working group, the following tools and maps
were used:
• Cartographic database at the 1:1,000,000 scale, containing information
on roads, hydrography, and natural features; and a municipal database at
the 1:500,000 scale. Both documents were produced by IBGE (2001);
•
Brazilian Biomes Vegetation Cover Map (MMA, 2007);
•
Data on the distribution of caves, provided by IBAMA/CECAV;
•
Satellite images available on GoogleEarth;
•
Digital Landscape Model from NASA, with 90m definition; and subwatersheds map prepared by ANA;
•
Map of Priority Areas and Actions for Biodiversity (MMA, 2004);
•
Map of biological importance and map of priority areas, automatically
generated by the system based on targets and goals distribution data.
The group discussing the Pernambuco and Alagoas states also used the
Pernambuco Biodiversity Atlas (SECTMA/PE), which defines priority areas and actions
for the conservation of ecosystems in the state. This Atlas resulted from the overlap of
the biodiversity, socio-economy, and abiotic aspects maps.
The group discussing the Minas Gerais state also used the State Biodiversity
Atlas (Biodiversitas). This Atlas presents the 112 areas that are most important for
biodiversity conservation in the state, and resulted from the overlap and analysis of
maps generated by 13 thematic groups working on biotic and abiotic aspects.
Technical Team and collaborators:
Bráulio Dias – DCBio/SBF/MMA; Marcos Reis Rosa – SBF/MMA; Manuella Andrade
de Souza – IBAMA; Ana Elisa Bacellar Schittini – COZAM/CGZAM/DIPRO/IBAMA;
Anselmo Cristiano de Oliveira – ProVárzea/IBAMA; Antônio Edson Guimarães Farias
– NBC/SBF/MMA; Daniele Blanc – Technical Staff at NZCM/SBF/MMA; Elizabete
Lemos de Carvalho – DCBio/SBF/MMA; Giovana Bottura – COZAM/CGZAM /
DIPRO/IBAMA; Guilherme Déstro – COZAM/CGZAM/DIPRO/IBAMA; Hélio Jorge
da Cunha - DCBio/SBF/MMA; Jailton Dias – COZAM/CGZAM/DIPRO/IBAMA; José
53
Luiz Vieira Cruz Filho – APNE; Luciene Marilac – GEF Caatinga; Maria da Penha E.
de Barros – NBC/SBF/MMA; Marina Landeiro - DCBio/SBF/MMA; Núbia Cristina
Silva Stella – DCBio/SBF/MMA; Paulo Magno Gabeto Martinez – NBC/SBF/MMA;
Rogério H. Vereza de Azevedo – DAP/SBF/MMA; Rosiane Maria Bezerra – GEF
Caatinga; Rosimere Ana Bezerra – GEF Caatinga; Sergio Ricardo Travassos da Rosa –
SBF/MMA; Viviane Mazim – SBF/MMA; TNC; Fundação Biodiversitas.
5.4. Results
A total of 292 priority areas for biodiversity conservation were identified in the
Caatinga, of which 72 are already under protection and 220 are new areas (see list of
Priority Areas for the Caatinga Biome in annex 11.9.4). The 292 priority areas occupy
approximately 51% of the total area of the biome, covering 442,564 km2. This
corresponds to a significant increase in the number of priority areas without a
proportional increase in total extension in comparison to the prior Priority Areas map
(2000), noting, however, greater detail in the identification of areas and actions in this
review process. The 2000 process identified 82 areas, in contrast with the 292 currently
suggested (Table 5.4.1).
The results of the process to update the priority areas are presented below:
comparison of the frequency of biological importance classes among themselves and
between the 2000 and 2006 identification processes (Table 5.4.1); comparison of the
frequency of urgency for action classes (Table 5.4.2); distribution of the main action
indicated to each of the identified areas (Table 5.4.3); distribution of all actions
indicated to each of the identified areas (Table 5.4.4); and the final map of the Priority
Areas for the Caatinga Biome (Figure 5.4.1 and insert to this publication).
Table 5.4.1 – Distribution of the number and extension of priority areas of the Caatinga Biome, by category of
Biological Importance, as defined in the 2000 and 2006 priority-setting processes.
New 2006
Protected 2006
Total 2000
Biological
Importance
High
Very High
Extremely High
Insufficiently
Known
TOTAL
Number
of Areas
45
67
80
Area
(km2)
76,886
110,549
185,054
28
220
35,720
408,208
%
19
27
45
9
Number of
Areas
14
13
35
Area
(km2)
3,004
4,819
25,581
10
72
954
34,357
%
9
14
74
3
Number
of Areas
18
12
27
Area
(km2)
53,163
36,565
154,186
25
82
137,542
381,457
%
14
10
40
36
Table 5.4.2 – Distribution of the number and extension of priority areas of the Caatinga Biome, by class of Priority
for Action, as defined in the 2006 review process.
New 2006
Protected 2006
Total 2006
Priority for
Action
High
Very High
Extremely High
TOTAL
Number
of Areas
59
77
84
220
Area
(km2)
69,161
123,534
215,513
408,208
%
17
30
53
Number of
Areas
29
23
20
72
Area
(km2)
5,013
7,428
21,917
34,357
%
15
22
64
Number
of Areas
88
100
104
292
Area
(km2)
74,174
130,963
237,429
442,566
54
%
17
30
54
Table 5.4.3 – Distribution of the main priority action indicated to the priority areas of the
Caatinga Biome.
Type of Priority Action
Creation of Protected Area – Undefined Category
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
Recuperation of Degraded Areas
Creation of Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering Sustainable Use
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Area
Biological Inventory
Fisheries Planning and Regularization
Other
No information
Territorial Planning and Regularization
NEW AREAS TOTAL
Areas already under protection
TOTAL
Total area of the BIOME
Number
of Areas
46
40
52
22
11
8
12
2
11
14
2
220
72
292
Area (km2)
115,296
94,629
80,444
43,546
18,549
18,534
14,865
11,923
4,956
4,486
981
408,208
34,357
442,566
852,262
Percent of the
BIOME
13.53
11.10
9.44
5.11
2.18
2.17
1.74
1.40
0.58
0.53
0.12
47.90
4.03
51.93
Table 5.4.4 – Distribution of all actions indicated to the priority areas of the
Caatinga Biome.
Number
Indicated Actions
of Areas
Area (km2)
Enforcement
152
307,641
Environmental Education
141
335,543
Biological Inventory
140
324,096
Recuperation of Degraded Areas
121
258,612
Fostering Sustainable Use
117
286,554
Studies on the Physical Environment
93
232,007
Socio-anthropological Studies
81
216,441
Creation of Mosaic/Corridor
49
115,096
Creation of Protected Area – Undefined Category
46
115,296
Recuperation of Endangered Species
43
122,707
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
40
94,629
Management of Biological Resources
23
41,086
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Area
8
18,534
55
Figure 5.4.1 – Map of Priority Areas for the Caatinga Biome.
56
6. Atlantic Forest Biome
6.1. Background
In 1500, when the first Europeans arrived in Brazil, the Atlantic Forest covered
approximately 15% of the territory. Currently, the native vegetation cover of the biome
was reduced to approximately 27% of its original extension, including in this total the
remnants of natural grasslands, restingas (coastal scrub) and mangroves. Approximately
7% are well preserved forest remnants, and the rest is composed by vegetation at the
initial and intermediary stages of regeneration.
The Atlantic Forest encompasses 18 Brazilian states, completely or partially, and
is recognized by the Federal Constitution as National Heritage. The forest enclaves and
inland altitudinal forest enclaves of the northeast are also considered part of the biome.
The Atlantic Forest also reaches part of the Goiás and Mato Grosso do Sul states in the
mid-west portion of the country, and extends inland through southern Brazil, reaching
parts of Argentina and Paraguay (Oliveira Filho et al, 2000).
Approximately 120 million people live in the Atlantic Forest region, distributed
through over 3,400 municipalities, or 62% of the Brazilian municipalities (IBGE, 2000).
Life quality of these people, which comprise almost 70% of the Brazilian population,
depends on the preservation of the forest fragments for the maintenance of springs and
headwaters, regulation of water supply to inland cities and communities, contributing to
climate, temperature, humidity, and rain balance, ensuring soil fertility, and protecting
steep inclines and mountain slopes.
The impact of human occupancy and the rate of destruction in this biome have
increased in the last three decades, resulting in severe alteration of these ecosystems due
to habitat fragmentation and biodiversity loss. The current result is the almost complete
loss of original forest and continuous destruction of existing forest remnants, sadly
placing the Atlantic Forest among the most threatened set of ecosystems in the world.
The Atlantic Forest contains a complex network of watersheds formed by large rivers
such as the Paraná, Tietê, São Francisco, Doce, Paraíba do Sul, Paranapanema, and
Ribeira do Iguape. This network is extremely important not only for supplying human
needs, but also for developing economic activities such as agriculture, ranching,
industry, and the entire urbanization process of the country.
The Atlantic Forest biome is composed by a group of forest formations and
associated ecosystems that include the Broadleaf Evergreen Forest, Mixed Broadleaf
Forest, Seasonal Semideciduous Forest, Seasonal Deciduous Forest, as well as
mangroves, restinga, altitudinal fields, Atlantic Forest enclaves, and altitudinal forest
enclaves (northeastern Brazil). The group of phytophysiognomies that compose the
Atlantic Forest provides significant environmental diversification, creating adequate
conditions for the evolution of a rich ecological community with numerous animal and
plant species. For this reason, the Atlantic Forest is currently considered one of the
biomes with the highest biological diversity value in the world.
Even severely reduced and fragmented, the Atlantic Forest still harbors high
plant diversity. For angiosperms alone (plants with seeds protected inside fruit), it is
believed that Brazil has between 55,000 and 60,000 species, i.e. between 22% and 24%
of the total estimated number of angiosperm species in the world. It is estimated that the
Atlantic Forest is home to approximately 20,000 species, which is between 33% and
36% of the country’s total.
57
For comparison purposes, the following numbers are estimates for angiosperm
diversity in other continents: 17,000 species in North America, 12,500 in Europe, and
between 40,000 and 45,000 in Africa. The Atlantic Forest is also the richest forest in the
world concerning tree diversity per area unit. Studies conducted by researchers from the
New York Botanical Garden and Executive Commission of the Cocoa Cultivation Plan
(CEPLAC) found 454 tree species per hectare in the Serra Conduru State Park, in
southern Bahia.
It should be noted that 50% of the known Atlantic Forest vascular plants are
endemic, i.e., they don’t occur anywhere else on the planet. Endemism rates increase
when plant species are separated by group, reaching 53.5% for trees, 64% for palm
trees, and 74.4% for bromeliads.
Estimates indicate the biome is home to 1.6 million animal species, mostly
insects. Some species are widely distributed and can be found in other regions, such as
the jaguar, puma, oncilla, tapir, collared peccary, white-lipped peccary, some parrots,
owls, hawks, and many others. In total, the Atlantic Forest is home to 849 bird species,
370 amphibian species, 200 reptile species, and approximately 350 fish species.
Nevertheless, the striking characteristic of this biome is the enormous amount of
endemic species. Of the 270 mammal species recorded for the biome, 73 are endemic,
among which 21 primate species and sub-species.
However, this high biodiversity faces a very uncertain future, since 350 of the
396 animal species officially listed as threatened with extinction in Brazil (MMA
Normative Ruling nº 03, of May 27, 2003) belong to the Atlantic Forest. Of the 265
threatened vertebrate species, 185 occur in the Atlantic Forest (69.8%), 100 of which
(37.7%) are endemic. Of the 160 listed bird species, 118 (73.7%) occur in this biome,
49 of which are endemic. Among the amphibians, the 16 threatened species are
considered endemic to the Atlantic Forest. Of the 69 threatened mammal species, 38
(55%) occur in this biome, 25 of which are endemic, such as the woolly spider monkey
(Brachyteles arachnoides) - the largest monkey of the Americas and the largest endemic
mammal in Brazil. Among the 20 threatened reptile species, 13 (65%) occur in the
Atlantic Forest, 10 of them endemic and most with distribution restricted to restinga
(coastal scrub) habitats, which are among the most threatened by urban development.
Species such as the sand lizard (Liolaemus lutzae) and Cropan’s boa (Corallus cropanii)
fall in this category.
Loss of habitat and wildlife traffic are among the greatest threats to the Atlantic
Forest fauna. In a country such as Brazil, where biodiversity is still little known, there
may be species that have become extinct even before they were scientifically recorded
and others that, as soon as found, join the list of threatened species. Examples of this
last case are the black-headed-lion-tamarin (Leontopithecus caissara) and the marsh
antwren (Stymphalornis acutirostris), both discovered by researchers on the Paraná
coast less than 300 km from São Paulo, the largest metropolis in South America.
Currently, only approximately 3% of the biome is protected in full protection
protected areas. This low percentage of protected areas is one of the main gaps for the
long term conservation of the Atlantic Forest. Even more serious is the fact that these
3% are not evenly distributed among the various forest formations and associated
ecosystems, making the measures to create and implement new protected areas a matter
of greater urgency. This underlines the importance of immediate efforts to protect all the
main remaining fragments of the biome that are still well conserved, thus complying
with international and national commitments of the Brazilian government. These facts
58
also demonstrate the need to adopt measures to promote the recuperation of degraded
areas, especially to connect the remaining fragments, allowing gene flow of plant and
animal species.
The 6th Conference of the Parties to the CBD (COP-6) approved as a global
2010 target for the plant conservation strategy to: effectively conserve at least 10% of
each global ecological region; protect 50% of the most important areas for plant
diversity; and the in situ conservation of 60% of the threatened plant species of the
world. During the 7th Global Conference on Biological Diversity (COP-7), the Parties
committed to reduce extinction levels by 2010, under the warning that human activities
are causing species loss at an unprecedented rate.
Specifically, the Deliberation of the 2nd National Environmental Conference
(November 2005) pointed out that Brazil must increase the number of protected areas
(both of full protection and sustainable use) and ensure their integrity and sustainability
to reach at least 20% of the original area of each biome under protection, ensuring at
least 4% of full protection protected areas in five years. CONABIO also approved the
2010 target to conserve, inside protected areas, at least 10% of the biome.
The approval, after 14 years, of Law no 11428 by the National Congress,
sanctioned on December 22, 2006, was an important landmark for the conservation of
the remaining fragments of the Atlantic Forest. The Atlantic Forest Bill, as it is known,
rules on the use and protection of the biome’s native vegetation and establishes use
criteria and restrictions for the remaining fragments of native vegetation, which are
specifically designed considering primary vegetation, and secondary vegetation at
initial, intermediate and advanced stages of regeneration. Thus, it establishes concrete
prospects to ensure the protection and recuperation of the remaining fragments, as well
as for the recuperation of degraded areas, especially through the establishment of
ecological corridors.
6.2. Technical Meeting and data processing
The technical meeting on the Atlantic Forest biome was held from April 10 to
12, 2006, in the city of São Roque – SP. A total of 56 biodiversity experts from various
research institutions, non-governmental organizations, and from the state and federal
government participated in this meeting, to detail conservation targets and define
conservation goals. This event was organized by the NAPMA/MMA technical team and
supported by SOS Mata Atlântica (see list of participants in annex 11.7.6).
6.2.1. Definition of Conservation Targets
The participants were organized into three thematic groups for discussions: (i)
Mammals and Birds; (ii) Invertebrates, Amphibians and Reptiles; and (iii)
Phytogeographical Units, Scenic Landscapes and Unique Habitats. The three main
objectives of these working groups were to: (1) prepare the list of conservation targets
that would guide the preparation of the Biological Importance Map; (2) indicate the
possible databases to be used; and (3) define the conservation goals for each listed
target. The following databases were used to achieve these objectives:
•
Species listed in the “National List of Brazilian Threatened Fauna” (MMA,
2003);
•
Species figuring in the Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN, 2005);
•
Some species listed in state lists of threatened fauna;
59
•
Endemic species of the Atlantic Forest;
•
Species of limited distribution that occur in the biome.
During the technical meeting, 409 species conservation targets were indicated,
distributed as follows by taxonomic group:
•
Invertebrates (98 spp);
•
Fish (84 spp);
•
Amphibians (13 spp);
•
Reptiles (15 spp);
•
Mammals (86 spp);
•
Birds (113 spp).
During the technical meeting, it was also defined that phytogeographical unit
targets would also be selected, based on geomorphology, vegetation, soils, altitude, and
the RADAM BRASIL and SRTM maps. The final map was generated to create coherent
units that include the particular aspects of the Atlantic Forest biota.
The geographical scope for updating the priority areas and actions for
biodiversity conservation in the Atlantic Forest followed the biome borders established
by the Brazilian Biomes Map (IBGE 2004). Additionally, this updating process also
considered the Atlantic Forest enclaves present in other biomes. The enclave areas in
other biomes that were considered priority had their recommendations submitted to
those responsible for updating priorities for those particular biomes.
6.2.2. Definition of Conservation Goals
Species
The researchers participating in the updating process decided to use a set of
standard conservation goals for all species, based on the threat category of each species.
In those cases where a species was listed both in the IBAMA and in the IUCN
threatened species lists, the highest threat classification was considered for this analysis.
Conservation goals for species were defined as a percentage of the area of
remaining vegetation fragments present within the distribution range of each species.
The four categories were attributed the following goals:
•
Critically Endangered: 100%;
•
Endangered: 75%;
•
Vulnerable: 50%;
•
Endemic: 50%.
It was also defined that all conservation targets with geographic distribution
smaller than 100,000 hectares would have the entire remaining distribution as its
conservation goal. For targets where the percentage generated a value smaller than
100,000 hectares, the minimum goal was set at 100,000 hectares.
Phytogeographical Units
Participating experts suggested the adoption of a Standard Conservation Goal of
35% of the remaining vegetation fragments for each phytogeographical unit. They also
suggested that all units with less than 10,000 hectares in remaining fragments would
60
have all remnants as their goal. For targets where the percentage generated a value
smaller than 100,000 hectares, the minimum goal was set at 100,000 hectares.
Adjustment of Conservation Targets and Goals
Despite all this effort and the participation of several institutions and researchers
who provided information, it was not possible to consider all targets listed during the
technical meeting, and it was therefore necessary to adjust the conservation targets and
goals. The groups of conservation targets and goals considered in the preparation of the
biological importance map for the Atlantic Forest are listed below (see list of
conservation targets and goals in annex 11.10.5):
Conservation Targets
• Species Targets (114 targets )
o Amphibians (8 spp);
o Reptiles (12 spp);
o Mammals (48 spp);
o Birds (40 spp);
o No information/No remaining fragments.
•
Phytogeographical Unit Targets
o A total of 93 environmental units were generated based on
geomorphology, vegetation, soils, and altitude.
Conservation Goals
• Goals for Species:
o Critically Endangered: 100% (above 100,000ha - 80%)
o Endangered: 75%
o Vulnerable: 50%
o Endemic: 50%
•
Minimum Goal: 100,000 ha
•
Fragment Filters: 50ha; 1,000ha; 10,000ha
•
Goals for Phytogeographical Units
o Base goal of 35% and minimum goal of 10,000ha.
o Units with remaining area less than 10%: 55% goal.
o Units with remaining area between 10% and 20%: 45% goal.
Preparation of the Biological Importance Map
Two decision-making supporting tools (C-Plan and MARXAN) were used in the
preparation of the Biological Importance Map for the Atlantic Forest. Hexagons of
6,000 hectares were adopted for application of the software, and the Patch Analyst
extension was used to generate the UP theme. Only the full protection protected areas
had the borders of hexagons within their limits dissolved, to respect the protected area
limits. All other protected area categories and indigenous lands had their limits inserted
into the UP database, but hexagons were maintained. The Biological Importance Map
for the Atlantic Forest provided to the working groups at the regional meetings resulted
61
from the Irreplaceability Map generated by C-Plan which, later, informed the
preparation of the map containing MARXAN’s Best Solution.
Technical Team:
Wigold B. Schaffer (NAPMA/SBF/MMA - Biome General Coordinator); Marcos Reis
Rosa (MMA - Technical General Coordinator); Leandro Baumgarten (MMA – Biome
Technical Coordinator); Paula Hanna Valdujo (MMA); Luis Henrique de Lima (MMA);
Ana Elisa Bacellar (CGZAM/IBAMA); Sofia Campiolo (Dríades); Cristhiane
Holvorcem (NAPMA/MMA); Ricardo Brochado Alves da Silva (NAPMA/MMA); Luis
Fernando Barros (NAPMA/MMA).
Figure 6.2.1 – Biological Importance Map for the Atlantic Forest
Biome.
6.3. Regional Workshops
To comply with the methodology to update the Priority Areas and Actions for
the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from Brazilian Biodiversity
approved by CONABIO, who determined the process should be participatory, three
regional workshops were organized for the updating process. Representatives from
62
various institutions (federal, state and municipal government, private sector, nongovernmental organizations, universities, and research centers) were invited to each
workshop, to ensure participation from the various sectors.
A broad database was prepared to support discussions, gathering general and
specific information on each region:
•
Landsat Images Set, from 2000 to 2002. Source: NASA, MMA and
CSR/IBAMA;
•
IBGE Cartographic Database – 1:1,000,000 (2001): containing information
on roads, hydrography, and natural features;
•
IBGE Municipal Database - 1:500,000 (2001): containing information on the
administrative borders of municipalities;
•
ANA Watersheds Database: containing the map of level 3 sub-watersheds;
•
Remaining Vegetation Map produced by SOS Mata Atlântica/INPE 2005, at
the 1:250,000 scale;
•
Map of Priority Areas and Actions for Biodiversity (MMA 2004);
•
Federal and state protected areas map, and map of indigenous lands;
•
NASA Digital Landscape Model with 90m definition;
•
Map of Phytogeographical Units: result from the overlap of geomorphology
information from the RADAM BRASIL Project with the Map of
Phytophysiognomies (IBGE 1970);
•
Preliminary proposal for new priority areas, generated by the analysis of the
biological importance map;
•
Biological Importance Map: generated based on the Conservation Targets
and Goals defined by experts during the regional technical meetings.
In addition to the database prepared by MMA, other data provided by
participants during the event, such as shapefiles containing priority areas for
conservation prepared by SEMA/ES, were incorporated to the supporting materials.
These data supported the identification, characterization, priority setting, and the
definition of actions proposed for priority areas.
South Region Workshop
The first event in this series of workshops was the South Region Workshop, held
in Florianópolis from November 7 to 9, 2006. This meeting had 55 participants,
representing various institutions from the three southern states: Rio Grande do Sul,
Santa Catarina, and Paraná. The participants were organized in four working groups, as
follows: Coastal Zone; Central Corridor; Northeast; and Southwest (see list of
participants in annex 11.8.7).
Technical Team
Wigold B. Schaffer (NAPMA/SBF/MMA – Biome General Coordinator); Leandro
Baumgarten (MMA – Biome Technical Coordinator); Luis Fernando Barros
(NAPMA/SBF - facilitating); Sofia Campiolo (Dríades - geoprocessing); Cristhiane
Holvorcem (NAPMA/SBF - geoprocessing and facilitator); Ricardo Brochado Alves da
Silva (NAPMA/SBF - geoprocessing and facilitator); Marina Landeiro
63
(DCBIO/SBF/MMA - facilitator); Viviane Mazin (MMA - geoprocessing and
moderçaão); Paula Hanna Valdujo (MMA - geoprocessing and facilitator); Raquel
Monti Henkin (MMA - support).
Southeast and Northeast Regions Workshop
The two last workshops were held in partnership with the teams discussing the
Coastal and Marine Zone, since it was considered that most of the Atlantic Forest on the
coast includes transition areas leading to ecosystems composing the Coastal Zone, and it
would therefore be of extreme importance to obtain results expressing and respecting
these interactions, providing the basis for the integrated management of these complex
systems. Following this reasoning, the second workshop (on the Southeast Region) was
held from November 21 to 23, 2006 in Rio de Janeiro/RJ, with 133 participants (see list
of participants in annex 11.8.8), and the third meeting (on the Northeast Region) was
held in Salvador/BA from December 5 to 7, 2006, with 74 participants (see list of
participants in annex 11.8.9). Participants of these two meetings represented institutions
from all three sectors: government (federal, state and municipal), private sector, and
civil society.
To make better use of the specific local knowledge detained by the various
participants, each workshop designed its own set of working groups (GTs). The
Southeast Region Workshop organized working groups according to states, while the
Northeast Region Workshop separated working groups according to regional
characteristics to respect social, ecological, and cultural particularities. Participants of
the Southeast Region Workshop were distributed into eight working groups, four of
which (GT1 – São Paulo Coast; GT2 – Rio de Janeiro; GT3 – Espírito Santo; GT6 –
Paraná, Santa Catarina, and Rio Grande do Sul) discussed and defined coastal priority
areas that included the Atlantic Forest, and two of which (GT7 – ZEE south of Chuí/RS
up to Santa Marta Cape/SC; GT8 – Santa Marta Cape/SC up to the state line between
Espírito Santo and Bahia) discussed and defined marine priority areas. The other two
groups (GT4 – Minas Gerais; GT5 – São Paulo Inland) discussed exclusively the inland
areas within the Atlantic Forest domain.
On the Northeast Region Workshop, seven working groups were formed, five to
discuss terrestrial areas and two to discuss marine areas. Among the working groups
discussing terrestrial areas (GT3 – from eastern Rio Grande do Norte up to Alagoas;
GT4 – Sergipe and north of Bahia; GT5 – from Salvador/BA to Canavieiras/BA; GT7 –
from Belmonte/BA up to the Espírito Santo state line), only the area discussed by GT1
(Ceará and northern Rio Grande do Norte) did not encompass areas within the Atlantic
Forest domain.
Technical Team – Southeast Region Workshop
Marcos Reis Rosa (MMA – Technical General Coordinator); Ana Paula Prates
(NZCM/SBF/MMA – Biome General Coordinator); Wigold B. Schaffer (NAPMA/SBF
- Biome General Coordinator); Leandro Baumgarten (MMA – Biome Technical
Coordinator); Luis Henrique de Lima (MMA - Biome Technical Coordinator);
Cristhiane Holvorcem (NAPMA/MMA - Geoprocessing and facilitator); Daniele Blanc
(NZCM/MMA); Leonel Graça Generoso Pereira (SBF/MMA - Facilitator); Luis
Fernando Barros (NAPMA/MMA - Facilitator); Maria Carolina Hazim (NZCM/MMA moderçaão); Marina Landeiro (DCBIO/MMA - facilitator); Ricardo Brochado Alves da
Silva (NAPMA/MMA - geoprocessing and facilitator); Rogério H. Vereza de Azevedo
(DAP/MMA - geoprocessing); Sandra Nunes Flores (CSR/IBAMA - geoprocessing);
Ana Lídia de Araújo Ramos (CSR/IBAMA - geoprocessing); Helio Jorge da Cunha
64
(DCBIO/MMA - facilitator); Raquel Barreto (CSR/IBAMA - geoprocessing); Renato
Prado dos Santos (SBF/MMA - geoprocessing); Viviane Mazin (MMA geoprocessing); Raquel Monti Henkin (MMA - support); Francoli Thiago Reis
(DCBIO/MMA - support); Daniel de Oliveira Wiechers (DCBIO/MMA - support).
Technical Team – Northeast Region Workshop
Marcos Reis Rosa (MMA – Technical General Coordinator); Ana Paula Prates
(NZCM/SBF/MMA – Biome General Coordinator); Wigold B. Schaffer (NAPMA/SBF
– Biome General Coordinator); Leandro Baumgarten (MMA – Biome Technical
Coordinator); Luis Henrique de Lima (MMA – Biome Technical Coordinator);
Cristhiane Holvorcem (NAPMA/MMA - geoprocessing and facilitator); Daniele Blanc
(NZCM/MMA - facilitator); Leonel Graça Generoso Pereira (SBF/MMA - facilitator);
Luis Fernando Barros (NAPMA/MMA - facilitator); Ricardo Brochado Alves da Silva
(NAPMA/MMA - geoprocessing and facilitator); Rogério H. Vereza de Azevedo
(DAP/MMA - geoprocessing); Sandra Nunes Flores (CSR/IBAMA - geoprocessing);
Ana Lídia de Araújo Ramos (CSR/IBAMA - geoprocessing); Helio Jorge da Cunha
(DCBIO/MMA - facilitator); Raquel Barreto (CSR/IBAMA - geoprocessing); Renato
Prado dos Santos (SBF/MMA - geoprocessing); Viviane Mazin (MMA geoprocessing); Raquel Monti Henkin (MMA - support); Daniel de Oliveira Wiechers
(DCBIO/MMA - support).
6.4. Results
The final results of the process to update the priority areas of the Atlantic Forest
biome indicated 880 areas distributed through 428,409 km2. Of this total, 522 are new
areas and 358 are areas under some type of protection (Table 6.4.1). According to the
Brazilian Biomes Vegetation Cover Map (MMA 2007), the current remaining area of
the Atlantic Forest biome is 1,129,760 km2, of which only 37.9% are covered by the
priority areas. Of these, 30.6% are new areas and only 7.3% are currently under some
form of protection – protected areas or indigenous lands (see list of Priority Areas for
the Atlantic Forest Biome in annex 11.9.5). When compared with the previous prioritysetting process, conducted in Atibaia/SP in 1999, a slight increase is noted in territorial
expansion of priority areas, in contrast to the 5:1 increase in the number of priority
areas. It is important to note that, despite the fact that the area analyzed by the first
priority-setting process was smaller (due to the non-inclusion of the Coastal Zone), the
main explanation for this increase is the improvement of the spatial distribution of the
information available for the analyses of the second process.
The results of the process to update the priority areas for the Atlantic Forest
biome are presented below: comparison of the frequency of biological importance
classes among themselves and between the 1999 and 2006 priority-setting processes
(Table 6.4.1); comparison of the frequency of urgency for action classes (Table 6.4.2);
distribution of the main action indicated to each of the identified areas (Table 6.4.3);
distribution of all actions indicated to each of the identified areas (Table 6.4.4); and the
final map of Priority Areas for the Atlantic Forest Biome (Figure 6.4.1 and insert to this
publication).
Table 6.4.1. – Distribution of the number and extension of priority areas for the Atlantic Forest Biome, by category of
Biological Importance, as defined in the 1999 and 2006 priority-setting processes.
New 2006
Protected 2006
Total 1999
Biological Importance
Nº of
Area
Nº of
Area
Nº of
Area
%
%
%
Areas
(km2)
Areas
(km2)
Areas
(km2)
65
High
107
48,167
14
66
6,964
8
26
48,465
13
Very High
173
125,595
36
41
8,655
11
33
35,592
9
Extremely High
195
151,642
44
227
65,336
79
96
235,596
62
46
20,786
6
24
1,335
2
22
60,863
16
521
346,191
358
82,290
177
380,516
Insufficiently Known
TOTAL
Table 6.4.2 – Distribution of the number and extension of the priority areas for the Atlantic Forest Biome,
Priority for Action class, as defined in the 2006 review process.
New 2006
Protected 2006
Total 2006
Priority for
Nº of
Area
Nº of
Area
Nº of
Area
Action
%
%
Areas
(km2)
Areas
(km2)
Areas
(km2)
128
57,010
16
126
12,590
15
254
69,600
High
160
101,876
29
96
26,101
32
256
127,977
Very High
Extremely High
TOTAL
233
187,305
521
346,191
54
136
43,599
358
82,290
53
369
230,903
879
428,481
Table 6.4.3 – Distribution of the main priority action indicated to the priority areas of the Atlantic
Forest Biome.
% of the
Nº of
2
Type of Priority Action
Total Area of
Area (km )
Areas
the Biome
Creation of Mosaic/Corridor
189
109,183
9.7
Creation of Protected Area – Undefined Category
Recuperation of Degraded Areas and/or
Population of Threatened Species
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
76
70,709
6.3
84
46,588
4.1
62
39,591
3.5
Biological Inventory
27
22,292
2.0
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Area
37
16,640
1.5
No Information
8
14,857
1.3
Fostering Sustainable Use
17
11,543
1.0
Fisheries Planning and Regularization
3
4,794
0.4
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
3
2,817
0.2
Other Actions
4
2,610
0.2
Territorial Planning and Regularization
5
2,408
0.2
Environmental Education
7
2,158
0.2
NEW AREAS TOTAL
522
346,191
30.6
Areas already under protection
358
82,218
7.3
TOTAL
880
428,409
37.9
Total area of the BIOME
1,129,760
Table 6.4.4 – Distribution of all priority actions indicated to the priority areas of the Atlantic Forest
Biome.
Type of Priority Action
Recuperation of Degraded Areas
Nº of
Areas
Area (km )
334
223,121
2
66
by
%
16
30
54
Biological Inventory
301
200,908
Enforcement
302
199,087
Environmental Education
286
183,214
Creation of Mosaic/Corridor
261
171,488
Fostering Sustainable Use
178
141,326
Recuperation of Threatened Species
90
73,612
Creation of Protected Area – Undefined Category
76
70,709
Studies on the Physical Environment
105
62,725
Socio-anthropological Studies
62
48,757
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
62
39,591
Management of Biological Resources
62
36,045
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Area
37
16,640
67
Figure 6.4.1 – Map of the Priority Areas of the Atlantic Forest Biome
68
7. Pampas Biome
7.1. Background
The Pampas biome covers an area of approximately 700,000 km2, shared by
Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay. In Brazil, the biome covers 176,496 km2 and
is restricted to the Rio Grande do Sul state, representing 2.07% of the national territory
and approximately 63% of that state’s area (IBGE 2004).
According to IBGE (2004b) the Pampas biome “comprises an environmental
collection of different geological formations and soils covered by natural grassland
phytophysiognomies. It is characterized by a rainy climate with no systematic dry
season, but with a typical frequency of cold fronts and negative temperatures during
winter, which produce a plant physiological seasonality that is typical of dry and cold
climates, underlining an intense evapotranspiration process, particularly on the
Campanha Plateau. The grassland landscapes of the Pampas biome are naturally
invaded by a number of tree elements from the Seasonal Deciduous Forest and
Broadleaf Evergreen Forest, notably in its north and east portions, characterizing a
natural substitution process transforming steppes into forest formations, due to changes
in the climate from cold/dry to hot/humid in the current interglacial period.”
The Pampas biome shares borders with the Atlantic Forest biome only, and is
composed of four main collections of natural grassland phytophysiognomies: Campanha
Plateau, Central Depression, Rio Grande do Sul Plateau, and Coastal Plains. The first
type has a predominantly smoothly undulated relief of basaltic origin covered by grasswoody steppe, and can be considered the core area of the biome in Brazil (IBGE
2004b). In general, the Campanha Plateau is used as natural and/or managed pasture,
but agricultural activities are also present, especially rice crops cultivated in the sparse
alluvial plains. This phytophysiognomy also presents Steppe Savanna disjunctions
typical of the Chaco environment, which are physiognomically homologous to the
Caatinga of northeastern Brazil (such as at the mouth of the Quaraí river, at the extreme
southwest of Rio Grande do Sul).
The Central Depression is characterized by woody grassland associated to
degraded gallery forests which, in general, are composed by deciduous tree species.
This phytophysiognomy has greater availability of humidity due to a more regular rain
regime and/or greater concentration of drainage and relief depressions. Extensive
alluvial sedimentary plains have formed associated to the dense drainage network, such
as those along the watersheds of the Jacuí, Vacacaí, and Santa Maria rivers, in which the
pioneer formations and gallery forests were substituted by crops and pastures (IBGE
2004b). Evidence obtained from the analysis of pollen and charcoal particles in
sediments indicate that the grasslands are natural ecosystems that already existed when
the first human groups arrived approximately 12 thousand years ago (Behling et al.
2004, 2005). Due to the drier climate, these grasslands probably presented then a
species composition slightly different from the current one, but in essence there were
three prairie habitats with the predominance of grasses. Approximately 4,000 years ago,
the natural expansion of forests begun, irradiating from refuges in deep valleys and
forming, in some regions such as on the Plateau, thick forests and riparian forests,
indicating a change to a more humid climate, similar to the current one, but still the
landscape in Rio Grande do Sul remained predominantly grassland-like. Therefore, the
existing grasslands are not the result of deforestation, as some might erroneously
believe.
69
The Rio Grande do Sul Plateau presents greater rain intensity, given the marine
influence. This results in a more complex natural vegetation cover, composed by Open
Tree Steppe, Park Steppe, and Grassy-Woody Steppe, with the notable presence of
seasonal semideciduous forest formations, especially on the eastern portion close to the
Patos Lagoon. In general, natural or managed pastures predominate (IBGE 2004b).
The Coastal Plains are formed by sedimentary soils of fluvial and marine origin,
mainly covered by pioneer woody-grassy formations, typical of the lagoon complex
composed mainly by the Patos, Mirim, and Mangueira Lagoons (IBGE 2004). The
predominant land use is natural pasture associated with rice crops.
As a very old collection of ecosystems, the Pampas is home to its own flora and
fauna and presents high biodiversity. Estimates indicate the presence of approximately
3,000 plant species, over 100 mammal species, and almost 500 bird species. Among the
various typical plant species of the Pampas are the bushes algarrobo (Prosopis
algarobilla) and nhandavaí (Acacia farnesiana), the last remaining individuals of which
are found in the Espinilho State Park, in the Barra do Quaraí municipality. This
ecosystem is home to a rich fauna with numerous endemic species, such as: the rodent
tuco-tuco (Ctenomys flamarioni); blue-tufted starthroat (Heliomaster furcifer), redbellied toad (Melanophryniscus atroluteus); and threatened species such as the pampas
deer (Ozotocerus bezoarticus); marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus); ruddy-breasted
seedeater (Sporophila hypoxantha); and chequered woodpecker (Picoides mixtus)
(MMA 2003).
The Pampas suffered great loss of biodiversity and habitats due to the
accelerated agricultural expansion process initiated in the 1970s and recently intensified
by the conversion of broad expanses of natural grasslands into forest monocultures.
According to the latest Agricultural Census (IBGE 2006), these processes resulted in
enormous conversion of natural grasslands into other land uses. From 1970 to 1996, the
natural grasslands reduced from 14 to 10.5 million hectares, corresponding to a 25%
conversion (IBGE 1996; DIEA 2003; Bilenca and Miñarro 2004).
Large-scale agricultural activities are important factors contributing to the
degradation of this biome. There are no official numbers on the total area of wetlands
already lost, but it is known that extensive flooded areas were drained and replaced
largely by rice crops and, at a smaller scale, by fruit crops. Currently, large eucalyptus
plantations are a major concern, given that in addition to the impacts of this economic
activity and its entire production chain, plantations of alien tree species in native
grasslands result in the loss of the biodiversity of rocky field habitats, and significant
alteration of the landscape and regional economy, which are the basis of the gaucho
culture (Pillar et al, 2006).
Cattle raising is one of the main economic activities of the southern grasslands,
given the plant diversity with high foraging value that exists in the biome (Nabinger et
al., 2000) and the vast areas of natural pasture which, according to the latest Brazilian
Agricultural Census (IBGE 2006), comprise 44% of the vegetation cover of Rio Grande
do Sul state, and correspond to 70% of the total area for cattle raising in the southern
region of Brazil. As a consequence, intensive grazing became another important
degradation agent for the natural grasslands, since it strongly accelerates the degradation
process of sandy soils that is transforming a large portion of the state into expansions of
naked sand. However, the Pampas have been used for raising cattle since the 17th
century, when the Jesuits began the Missions to Christianize the Guarani Indians. The
activity of raising cattle in vast open grasslands is the very image of the gaucho culture,
70
the identity of the people who call themselves gaucho instead of a native of Rio Grande
do Sul state. This extensive cattle raising present throughout the Pampas has contributed
to maintain and preserve the vegetation and may also contribute to maintain the
integrity of its grassland ecosystems; however, the borderline between sustainable use
and degradation is very tenuous.
Conserving the natural grassland habitats is of fundamental importance for
biodiversity. These habitats maintain a collection of biota that is characteristic of the
natural grasslands, and their conservation represents the protection of various known
and still unknown elements of fauna and flora, as well as the ecosystem processes.
Particularly important for conservation are the headwaters of the natural grasslands,
springs, and recharge areas of the Guarani aquifer. The recent discovery of new fish and
crustacean species (Bond-Buckup et al. 2006, Malabarba, L. R. et al., 2006) in water
bodies of the natural grasslands of Rio Grande do Sul underlines the importance of
maintaining these areas, since they are home to organisms still unknown to science.
Furthermore, the maintenance of well-preserved natural areas is essential for
maintaining water quality of rivers and ground water (Pillar et al., 2006).
Currently, with the Brazilian Biomes Vegetation Cover Map (MMA 2007), it
is possible to determine what extension of these remaining habitats are still native
grasslands and/or under regeneration, and how much was degraded by crops, inadequate
grazing management, or invasion of alien species such as the Annoni grass (Eragrostis
plana). In addition to this effort, the MMA has updated the Priority Areas and Actions
for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from the Pampas
Biodiversity as another public policy tool that will guide actions for the conservation,
recuperation, and sustainable use of the natural resources of the southern grasslands. All
steps of this updating process are described below.
7.2. Technical Meetings and data processing
7.2.1. Definition of Conservation Targets
The technical meeting was held in Porto Alegre/RS on March 9 and 10, 2006,
at UFRGS, with 60 participants (researchers, government technical staff, and
representatives of the third sector) (see list of participants in annex 11.7.7). During the
meeting, experts defined the conservation targets and goals, which informed the
preparation of the biological importance map of the Pampas Biome (see list of targets
and goals in annex 11.10.6). The participants were organized into two working groups,
one focusing the definition of species targets and the other focusing the definition of
Planning Units (UPs). By the end of the meeting, 116 conservation targets were
indicated, separated into two large groups as follows:
•
86 Species Targets
o Sponges (2 spp);
o Mollusks (4 spp);
o Crustaceans (3 spp);
o Insects (5 spp);
o Amphibians (6 spp);
o Reptiles (3 spp);
71
o Mammals (21 spp);
o Birds (42 spp);
o No information/No remaining original habitat (18 spp);
•
30 UP targets (based on geomorphology, vegetation, and soils – RADAM
BRASIL and SRTM). The final UP map was generated considering the
particular characteristics of the Pampas biota.
The geographical scope for updating the priority areas and actions for the
conservation of biodiversity in the Pampas Biome followed the limits established by the
Brazilian Biomes Map (IBGE 2004).
7.2.2. Definition of Conservation Goals
Species
The participants of the technical meeting decided to use a set of standard goals
to define conservation goals for all species, based on the threat category of each species.
In those cases where a species was listed both in the IBAMA and in the IUCN
threatened species lists, the highest threat category was considered in the analysis.
The conservation goals for species were defined as a percentage of the
remaining habitat area within the distribution of each species. The various categories
were attributed the following goals:
•
Critically Endangered: 80%
•
Endangered: 60%
•
Vulnerable: 40%
•
Endemic: 40%
It was also defined that no species target would have a conservation goal
smaller than 10,000 hectares or greater than 1,000,000 hectares.
Phytogeographical Units (UFGs)
Participating experts decided to organize UFGs in three target categories (70%;
50%; 30%). This ranking was based on vulnerability, distribution area, and threat status.
The conservation goal for wetlands was set at 50%. It was also decided that all UFGs
with less than 10,000 hectares of remaining habitat area would have all remaining
fragments as its conservation goal. For goals where the percentage resulted in a number
smaller than 10,000 hectares, the minimum goal was set at 10,000 hectares.
Preparation of the Biological Importance Map
Two decision-making supporting tools were used for preparing the Biological
Importance Map for the Pampas: C-Plan and MARXAN; and 2,500-hectare hexagons
were adopted as UPs, using the Patch Analyst extension to generate the UP theme.
Hexagons inside full protection protected areas had their limits dissolved to respect the
borders of the protected area. The shape of all other protected areas and indigenous
lands was included in the UP database, but hexagons were maintained. The Biological
Importance Map of the Pampas provided to the working groups in the regional
workshops was a result of the Irreplaceability Map generated by C-Plan which, later,
informed the preparation of the map containing MARXAN’s Best Solution.
Technical Team
72
Wigold B. Schaffer (NAPMA/SBF/MMA – General Coordinator); Marcos Reis Rosa
(MMA – General Technical Coordinator); Leandro Baumgarten (MMA – Technical
Coordinator for the Biome); Anthony Chatwin (TNC); Paula Hanna Valdujo (MMA);
Luiz Fernando R. de Barros (MMA); Ana Elisa Bacellar (CGZAM/IBAMA).
7.3. Regional Workshop
The regional workshop for consolidating the process to update the Priority Areas
and Actions for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from the
Pampas Biodiversity was held in Porto Alegre/RS, from October 30 to November 1,
2006. The event had 65 participants representing different governmental levels,
academia, business sector, NGOs, social movements, and traditional and indigenous
communities (see list of participants in annex 11.8.10).
For a better use of the specific local knowledge detained by participants, they
were organized into four working groups according to sub-region (Figure 7.3.1).
Figure 7.3.1. Distribution of the Sub-regional Working Groups of the
regional workshop held in Porto Alegre/RS.
The NAPMA/MMA technical team prepared a complete database to inform
discussions, collating general and specific information on each region:
•
Set of Landsat Images from 2000 to 2002. Source: NASA, MMA and
CSR/IBAMA
•
IBGE Cartographic Database – 1:1,000,000 (2001): containing information
on the road network, hydrography, and natural features;
•
IBGE Municipality Database - 1:500,000 (2001): containing information of
the administrative borders of municipalities;
•
ANA Watersheds Database: containing the map of level 3 sub-watersheds;
•
Brazilian Biomes Vegetation Cover Map (MMA 2007);
73
•
Map of Priority Areas and Actions for Biodiversity (MMA 2004);
•
Map of federal and state protected areas and map of indigenous lands;
•
NASA Digital Landscape Model with 90m definition;
•
Phytogeographical Units Map: result from the overlap of the geomorphology
information from the RADAM BRASIL Project with the
Phytophysiognomies Map (IBGE 1970);
•
Preliminary proposal for the new priority areas: generated through the
analysis of the biological importance map;
•
Biological Importance Map: generated based on the Conservation Targets
and Goals defined by experts in the regional technical meetings (Figure
7.3.2).
In addition to the database prepared by MMA, other data provided by
participants during the event (e.g.: shapefile with priority areas for conservation
produced by SEMA/RS; etc) were also used by the working groups in the identification,
characterization, priority setting, and definition of actions proposed for the priority
areas.
Figure 7.3.2. – Biological Importance Map for the Pampas Biome.
Technical Team
Wigold B. Schaffer (NAPMA/SBF/MMA – General Coordinator); Marcos Reis Rosa
(MMA – General Technical Coordinator); Leandro Baumgarten (NAPMA/MMA –
74
Technical Coordinator for the Biome); Cristhiane Holvorcem (NAPMA/MMA); Luis
Henrique Lima (NZCM/MMA); Marina Landeiro (DCBIO/SBF/MMA); Paula Hanna
Valdujo (NCP/MMA); Ricardo Brochado Alves da Silva (IBAMA); Sofia Campiolo
(Dríades); Ana Elisa Bacellar (CGZAM/IBAMA); Luiz Fernando R. de Barros
(NAPMA /MMA); Raquel Monti Henkin (MMA);
7.4. Results
The final results of the process to update the Priority Areas and Actions for the
Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from Biodiversity of the Pampas
generated a map with 105 priority areas, 17 of which are already under protection and
88 are new indications (see list of the Priority Areas for the Pampas Biome in annex
11.9.6). The total area covered by the priority areas occupies a little over half of the
Biome (52.9%), of which 49.3% are new areas and only 3.6% are already under some
type of protection – protected areas or indigenous lands (Table 7.4.2). In comparison
with the previous priority-setting process, held in Atibaia/SP in 1999, there was a
significant increase in the number of priority areas, from 5 to 105, and a smaller
increase in the total extension, from 77,293 km2 to 94,595 km2. The new process also
resulted in a better distribution among categories of biological importance. In 1999,
77.1% of the priority areas were classified as of Extremely High biological importance,
while the new process indicated 38.9% of the priority areas to this category, followed by
41% of Very High importance, and 18.8% of High importance.
The results of the process to update the priority areas are presented below:
comparison of the frequency of biological importance classes among themselves and
between the 1999 and 2006 priority-setting processes (Table 7.4.1); comparison of the
frequency of urgency for action classes (Table 7.4.2); distribution of the main action
indicated to each of the identified areas (Table 7.4.3); distribution of all actions
indicated to each of the identified areas (Table 7.4.4); and the final map of Priority
Areas for the Pampas Biome (Figure 7.4.1 and insert to this publication).
Table 7.4.1 – Distribution of the number and extension of priority areas of the Pampas Biome, by Biological Importance
category, as defined in the 1999 and 2006 processes.
Biological Importance
High
Very High
Extremely High
Insufficiently Known
TOTAL
New 2006
Nº de
Area
Areas
(km2)
17
16,590
28
36,285
41
34,292
2
934
88
88,101
%
19
41
39
1
Protected 2006
Nº of
Area
Areas
(km2)
2
1,181
1
3,168
14
2,145
0
0
17
6,494
%
18
49
33
0
Total 1999
Nº of
Area
Areas
(km2)
0
0
2
17,675
3
59,618
0
0
5
77,293
Table 7.4.2 – Distribution of the number and extension of priority areas for the Pampas Biome, by Priority
Action class, as defined in the 2006 process.
New 2006
Protected 2006
Total 2006
Priority
Nº
of
Area
Nº
of
Area
Nº
of
Area
for Action
%
%
Areas
(km2)
Areas
(km2)
Areas
(km2)
25
29,513
33
5
1,592
25
30
31,105
High
22
30,286
34
4
1,259
19
26
31,545
Very High
41
28,302
32
8
3,643
56
49
31,945
Extremely High
88
88,101
17
6,494
105
94,595
TOTAL
75
%
0
23
77
0
for
%
33
33
34
Table 7.4.3. – Distribution of the main priority action indicated to the priority areas of the
Pampas Biome.
Type of Priority Action
Creation of Protected Area – undefined category
Creation of Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering Economic Activities of Sustainable Use
Recuperation of Degraded Areas and/or
Populations of Threatened Species
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
No information
Biological Inventory
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Area
Environmental Education
Planning and Regularization
NEW AREAS TOTAL
Areas already under protection
TOTAL
Total area of the BIOME
Nº of
Areas
Area (km2)
Percent of
the BIOME
19
21
5
18,338
16,570
11,533
10.3
9.3
6.4
13
13
3
5
6
2
1
88
17
105
10,746
9,118
8,563
8,116
4,359
692
67
88,101
6,494
94,595
178,820
6.0
5.1
4.8
4.5
2.4
0.4
0.0
49.3
3.6
52.9
Table 7.4.4. – Distribution of all actions indicated to the priority areas of the Pampas
Biome.
Type of Priority Action
Enforcement
Environmental Education
Biological Inventory
Studies on the Physical Environment
Recuperation of Degraded Areas
Creation of Mosaic/Corridors
Creation of Protected Area – undefined category
Socio-anthropological Studies
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Area
Recuperation of Species
Management
Nº of
Areas
60
49
46
31
47
34
19
9
13
6
6
3
Area (km2)
59,951
40,273
39,302
28,669
27,678
23,279
18,338
9,431
9,118
4,359
3,391
2,610
76
Figure 7.4.1 – Map of the Priority Areas for the Pampas Biome
77
8. Coastal and Marine Zone
8.1. Background
Brazil holds the largest biodiversity in the planet, with at least 10% - 20% of the
total number of species. This richness is distributed through several biomes, such as the
Amazon, Atlantic Forest, Pampas, Cerrado, Pantanal, Caatinga, and Coastal and Marine
Zone.
The Coastal and Marine Zone2 occupies approximately 3 million km2 under
Brazilian jurisdiction. Brazil has one of the longest coastal lines in the world, with over
7,400 km between the mouth of the Oiapoque river (04°52’45”N) and the mouth of the
Chuí river (33°45’10”S), with extraordinarily diverse ecological systems. Still, in
compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Brazil requested
to the UN that 900,000 km2 be added to this area, in locations where the continental
shelf extends beyond the 200 nautical miles (according to the Convention, this strip may
be stretched up to 370 km). This request was recently accepted, increasing the Brazilian
jurisdictional waters to approximately 4.5 million km2. This total area is being referred
to by CIRM as the Blue Amazon3.
The Brazilian coast is bathed by cold waters on the south and southeast coast
lines and by warm waters on the northeast and north coast lines, which support a variety
of ecosystems including mangroves, coral reefs, dunes, restingas (coastal scrub), sandy
beaches, exposed rocky coastlines, lagoons, and estuaries, with numerous species of
animals and plants, many of which are endemic and some threatened with extinction
(MMA 2002a and 2002b).
The Coastal Zone is the region that makes the interface between the continent
and the sea, dominated by processes that originate in the watershed of the affluent
rivers, and by oceanographic and atmospheric processes. The high concentration of
nutrients and other environmental factors such as temperature gradients, variable
salinity, and exceptional conditions to provide shelter and support to the reproduction
and feeding of young individuals of most species that inhabit the oceans, give this area a
fundamental role in the connection and gene flow between the terrestrial and marine
ecosystems. This fact makes the Coastal Zone a complex and diversified environment of
extreme importance to support coastal and marine life, and for this reason it should be
one of the main focuses of attention for environmental conservation and maintenance of
aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity.
2 According to the definition of the National Program for Coastal Management, the coastal and marine
zone also includes, in its original definition, in addition to the coastal zone itself (which comprises a strip
8,698 km long and with variable width, encompassing a collection of contiguous ecosystems covering an
area of approximately 388,000 km², including a terrestrial portion and a marine portion, which correspond
to the Brazilian territorial sea, with a width of 12 nautical miles from the coast line – source:
GERCO/MMA), the coastal and oceanic islands, the marine continental shelf, and the Exclusive
Economic Zone – ZEE, which extends from the external limit of the 12-mile territorial sea to 200 nautical
miles from the coast.
3 The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) – signed by Brazil on December 10,
1982 and ratified on December 22, 1988 – introduces and ratifies the concepts of territorial sea, exclusive
economic zone and continental shelf. Law nº 8617 of January 04, 1993, sanctioned the UNCLOS, making
the Brazilian marine limits coherent with the limits preconized by the Convention. See also the site:
https://www.mar.mil.br/menu_v/amazonia_azul.htm.
78
Currently, these regions of the world encompass less than 20% of the planet’s
surface, but are home to over 45% of the human population, harboring 75% of the large
cities with over 10 million inhabitants, and provide approximately 90% of the global
fisheries production. The coastal region is also an important zone for food production
through agriculture, hoofstock raising, fisheries, and aquaculture; it is the focus of
industrial and transportation development; significant source of mineral resources,
including oil and natural gas; main touristic destination in all continents; and abundant
reservoir of species and ecosystems, on which the planet depends for functioning.
Numerous marine species may be considered as “products” for the direct use of
human beings, both for consumption and for commercialization. The living marine
resources may be, in addition to important food source, used as components for drugs,
cosmetics, or other medical use, fertilizers, genes for biotechnology, raw material for
the industry, or even for construction works, in addition to all aquaculture uses (ThorneMiller, 1999). Moreover, over half of the global oil production comes from the oceans.
In the 1970s, methane hydrate reserves were found in the sea (methane molecules
trapped in water crystals), and the energy potential of this resource is equivalent to
twice as much as all the existing oil, natural gas, and coal.
In Brazil, the coastal zone concentrates one fourth of the country’s population,
or approximately 36.5 million people (IBGE, 1996), living in about 400 municipalities
with an average population density of 87 inhabitants/km2 (five times the national
average of 17 inhabitants/km2). The number of inhabitants in urban areas corresponded,
in 1991, to 87.66% of the total, noting that 13 of the 17 state capitals of the coastal
states are located by the sea. The coastal economic activities are responsible for
approximately 70% of the national GNP (MMA 2007).
The growth of the human population that lives, works, and uses these natural
resources causes pressures that, combined with other natural pressures, deserve to be
monitored and understood to allow the preservation of this environment and the
maintenance of human life quality. The loss of habitats is proof of the negative effects
of human pressure, such as the loss of intertidal areas, restingas, mangroves, and coral
reefs, among other ecosystems, and the decreased quality of coastal and ground water,
algal blooms, decrease of commercial and artisanal fisheries, reduction of living and
non-living resources, pollution of beaches, increased erosion processes and coastal
floods, among others. The pressures from use conflicts affecting the environmental
integrity and balance of coastal regions place these regions among the most threatened
on the planet, and the conservation of these resources tends to be increasingly
problematic and expensive, both politically and environmentally.
The coastal zone fauna and flora compose a complex and sensitive biological
system, with extraordinary processes and pressure inter-relationships, playing a
fundamental role on most coastal regulatory mechanisms. These ecosystems are
responsible for a broad range of “ecological services”, such as the prevention of floods,
saline intrusion, and coastal erosion; protection against storms; nutrient recycling and
processing of polluting substances; and provision of habitat and resources to a variety of
directly or indirectly exploited species (MMA 2002).
However, the biological diversity is not evenly distributed along the various
coastal and marine ecosystems. Sandy beaches and mudflats, for instance, are low
diversity systems holding specialized organisms, given the absence of surfaces
necessary for fixation and limited food availability. Restingas (coastal scrub) and
exposed rocky coastlines are at an intermediary position concerning biodiversity, while
79
coastal lagoons and estuaries are fertile systems, serving as shelter and breeding
grounds for numerous species. The mangroves present high structural and functional
diversity and, together with estuaries, play the role of biomass exporters to adjacent
systems. Finally, the coral reefs support a variety of animal species close in number to
that observed in tropical rainforests, and are therefore one of the most diverse
environments on the planet (Wilson, 1992; Reaka-Kudla, 1997).
As a transition area, the coastal zone overlaps significantly with the Amazon and
Atlantic Forest biomes, and also maintains interface areas with other important biomes
such as the Caatinga, Cerrado, and Pampas. For this reason, the coastal zone is not
characterized as a unit, nor delimits a specific biome; rather, it forms numerous
ecosystem complexes. Despite the tropical and subtropical characteristics that dominate
along the entire coast, the regional phenomena are responsible for defining the
particular oceanographic and climatic conditions that determine the distinctive traits of
biodiversity.
On the northern coast, at the mouth of the Amazonas river, the discharge
materials and the energy expansion (tides, currents, waves, winds), given their
magnitude, produce endless interdependent and complex oceanographic processes that
strongly influence the distribution of the region’s living resources. The large Marajoara
and Maranhense Gulfs represent highly dynamic estuarine complexes, as the natural
paths for large solid discharges. The estuaries, coastal lagoons and mangroves are
present along the entire northern coast, where turtles, mammals (notably the marine
manatee), birds, and various fish species are found. Several threatened bird species,
such as the scarlet ibis, occur and reproduce in this area, which is also a migratory
corridor and wintering grounds for other species. The coastline in this region is very
diverse in shape. The Amapá coast is straight, while northeastern Pará and northwestern
Maranhão present a highly irregular coastline. To the east of Tubarão Bay, on the
Maranhão coast, the coastline becomes straight again and oceanic waters are typically
very transparent (El-Robrini et al., 1992).
Off the northeastern region, the absence of large rivers and the predominantly
warm waters of the Southern Equatorial Current determine a favorable environment for
the constitution of coral reefs, which support high biological diversity. The reefs form
highly diversified ecosystems that are rich in natural resources and of high ecological,
economic, and social importance, contributing to the subsistence of various traditional
coastal communities (Prates, 2006). The coral reefs are distributed along 3,000 km of
the northeastern coast, from Maranhão to the south of Bahia. These are the only reef
ecosystems of the South Atlantic Ocean, and the main species that form these reefs
occur only on Brazilian waters (Maida e Ferreira, 1997). The Atol das Rocas is the only
atoll with coral formations in the South Atlantic, characterized as important nesting area
for tropical marine birds and important breeding grounds for marine turtles.
The Abrolhos Bank is the most extensive area of coral reefs in Brazil and holds
all eighteen species that inhabit the reef substrates of the country, half of which occur
only on Brazilian waters. The four large coral groups – rocky corals, fire corals,
octocorals, and black corals – are represented among the species of the Abrolhos Bank,
two of which (Mussismilia brasiliensis and Favia leptophylla) are endemic to the state
of Bahia (Laborel, 1969 and Leão, 1994). The extreme south of Bahia is thus a notable
region that holds a rich and diverse mosaic of ecosystems that include native forests,
rivers, mangroves, beaches, estuaries, coral reefs, and marine islands. This large variety
of habitats ensures the maintenance of high biodiversity in the region, notably in the
marine environment, where the resident species and those that use the area as breeding
80
grounds attribute great environmental and socio-economic importance to the Abrolhos
Bank.
Along the south and southeast coast, the Central Waters of the South Atlantic
Ocean are over the continental shelf and their eventual resurgence along the coast
contribute to increasing productivity. Further to the south, during the winter months, the
northbound displacement of the Subtropical Convergence, formed by the meeting of the
waters from the Brazilian Current with the Falklands/Malvinas Current, confers to the
region climatic characteristics that are closer to the temperate climate, profoundly
influencing the composition of the local fauna.
The Marine Zone begins on the coastal region and, in the Brazilian case, extends
to 200 miles off the coast, constituting the Exclusive Economic Zone (ZEE). The
Brazilian ZEE has an extension of approximately 3.5 million km2, limited to the north
by the mouth of the Oiapoque River, and to the south by the mouth of the Chuí River,
extending east to include the areas surrounding the Atol das Rocas, the Fernando de
Noronha Archipelago, the São Pedro and São Paulo Archipelago, and the Trindade and
Martin Vaz Islands (figure 8.2.1).
The Marine Zone is less environmentally vulnerable than the Coastal Zone,
since it presents strong resistance forces against human intervention, such as great
depths and strong marine currents, storms, and greatest distances from high density
terrestrial areas, and these resistance forces increase with the distance from the
coastline.
The geomorphology of the Brazilian continental shelf is fairly diversified, from
8 km off the Bahia coast to 370 km wide in the region of the mouth of the Amazonas
river. In the northern region, the width of the continental shelf varies from 146 km off
the Amapá coast, reaching 292 km off the Amazonas coast, and shrinking to only 73 km
off Tubarão Bay. The depths included in the ZEE vary from 11m to a little over 4,000m,
and the continental shelf drop-off between 75m and 80m. The ZEE also includes a
stretch of the Abyssal Flats of Ceará, where some deep seabeds can be observed
(Knoppers et al., 2002)
The Internal Continental Shelf of the Amazonas, between the estuary of the Pará
River and the border with French Guiana is covered by muddy deposits that favor the
operation of trawl fishing due to the enormous deposits of crustaceans and other
fisheries resources this substrate contains. The region is also strongly influenced by the
Brazilian North Current (Guianas Current), which transports water from the external
shelf and continental slope towards the northwest (Kuehl, 1986). The macronutrient
flow derives exclusively from the numerous estuaries in the region, and is found in low
concentrations at the surface and high concentrations at greater depths. Space-time
variations of macronutrients are still little documented.
The northeastern coastline presents a reasonably regular profile starting at the
mouth of the Parnaíba River, broken only by the estuaries and deltas of large rivers,
notably the Parnaíba and São Francisco rivers. The northeastern continental shelf has an
average width between 36 km and 55 km, and the continental drop-off varies from 40m
to 80m, basically composed by irregular bottom and calcareous algae formations. A
notable characteristic of this coast, especially between the cities of Natal and Aracaju, is
the coastal barrier reef that borders it, as previously mentioned.
In addition to the oceanic islands – Atol das Rocas, Fernando de Noronha
Archipelago, and São Pedro and São Paulo Archipelago – a series of shallow oceanic
81
banks with depths between 50m and 350m, belonging to the North-Brazilian Chain of
Fernando de Noronha, occurs off the continental shelf, notably off the coasts of Ceará
and Rio Grande do Norte states. Most of the oceanic domain, however, is formed by
areas of great depth, between 4,000m and 5,000m, which correspond to the Ceará and
Pernambuco Abyssal Flats. Off the Sergipe and Bahia coasts, the environment is
determined by tropical oceanographic characteristics, and the continental shelf is
narrow, with average width of 10 km, except around the Abrolhos Bank, which presents
an expressive expansion of the shelf (over 300 km). This region is dominated by
irregular bottom with calcareous algae formations, extending almost up to the São Tomé
Cape on the north of Rio de Janeiro state (Knoppers et al., 2002).
A notable exception in the southeast region is the eastward expansion of the
continental shelf, with widths up to 240 km. This region is formed by submarine banks
of the Vitória-Trindade and Abrolhos banks, which cause a detour on the Brazilian
Current and disturb the vertical stratification, bringing deep waters to the surface. The
nutrient enrichment of this area allows the presence of relatively abundant fisheries
resources. The region between the São Tomé Cape and Frio Cape is characterized as a
transition strip between the calcareous bottom, dominant to the north, and the extensive
areas covered by sand, mud and clay to the southeast-south. From Frio Cape down, a
flow regularization of the Brazilian Current is observed, and its direction changes to
southwest, due to the alteration of the coastline direction and the greater width of the
continental shelf, which reaches 220 km (Knoppers et al., 2002).
At the extreme south of the country, the Brazilian Current meets the
Falklands/Malvinas Current, forming the Subtropical Convergence. Part of the cold
water coming from the south dives and occupies the lower layer of the Brazilian Current
along the continental slope, originating the Central Water of the South Atlantic
(CWSA), a water mass that is rich in nutrients, with low temperatures and low salinity
(Knoppers et al., 2002). During summer, a penetration of the CWSA is observed over
the continental shelf off the southeast region, which reaches the coastal zone and
directly influences the increase of primary production. To the south, a coastal arm of the
Falklands/Malvinas Current reaches the eutrophic zone over the continental shelf. The
nutrient availability derived from this water and from the waters of continental origin
contributes to the region’s richness, favoring the presence of important fisheries
resources. This characterization demonstrates the variation of marine ecosystems that
occur in the Brazilian jurisdictional waters.
In terms of species diversity, in addition to those that comprise the fisheries
stocks (fishes, crustaceans, mollusks, and algae) and the corals, there is a great number
of mammal species, bird species, and chelonian species both in the coastal and marine
regions. At least 43 cetaceans are recorded in the Brazilian ZEE, four of which inspire
concerns about their conservation: the right whale (Eubalaena australis); the humpback
whale (Megaptera navaeangliae); the franciscana or La Plata dolphin (Pontoporia
blainvillei); and the tucuxi dolphin (Sotalia fluviatilis). There are only four species of
the Sirenia order in the entire world, two of which occur in Brazil; only one of these
latter is a marine species: the marine manatee (Trichechus manatus). This is the most
threatened marine mammal in Brazil, with disjoint residual populations distributed from
Alagoas to Amapá, totaling at most a few hundred individuals. Seven piniped species
are known to the Brazilian waters, of which two are relatively common: the sea lion
(Otaria flavescens) and the South American fur seal (Arctocephalus australis). The
presence of a southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina) was recorded in the Fernando
82
de Noronha Archipelago, which is considered the northern-most limit for the occurrence
of pinipeds in the country (Rossi-Wongtschowski et al., 2006)
Over 100 bird species were recorded as associated to the Brazilian coastal and
marine ecosystems, according to Rossi-Wongtschowski et al. (2006). Some of the
marine birds found in Brazil are resident species, and other are migratory species
coming from the northern hemisphere and from regions to the south of Brazil.
Threatened species such as the scarlet ibis (Eudocius ruber) occur and breed in the
northern region, which is also a migratory corridor and wintering grounds for Nearctic
Charadriiforme birds and colonial breeding grounds for Ciconiiforme birds. The coastal
islands of the southeast and south regions are nesting grounds for terns (Sterna spp.),
Audubon’s shearwater (Puffinus lherminieri), magnificent frigatebird (Fregata
magnificens), brown booby (Sula leucogaster), and kelp gull (Larus dominicanus).
Of the seven species of marine turtles that exist in the world, five live in
Brazilian waters: loggerhead (Caretta caretta), green turtle (Chelonia mydas),
leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata), and olive
ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea). These species seek coastal beeches and oceanic islands
to lay their eggs and for shelter, food, and growth.
This diversity of ecosystems and species requires specific and integrated actions
for conservation. Some significant advances in public policies can be reported in this
field. Based on the CBD decisions, the Brazilian government committed to prepare the
National Protected Areas Plan (PNAP), taking into consideration the coastal and marine
particularities. PNAP was officially recognized by Decree 5758/2006, which defined
principles, directives, objectives, and strategies to the establishment of an
encompassing, representative, and effectively managed system of terrestrial protected
areas by 2010, and of marine areas by 2012. Particularly notable is the directive to
create and manage marine protected areas focusing on biodiversity conservation and the
recuperation of fisheries stocks. To this end, the process to revise and update the
“Priority Areas for the Conservation of Brazilian Biodiversity” concluded one of its
objectives to design a system of protected areas in the various Brazilian biomes,
including the coastal and marine zone.
8.2. Technical Meetings and data processing
Given the territorial extension and biological and ecological heterogeneity of the
Brazilian coastal and marine zone, the NZCM/MMA technical team decided to hold
four technical meetings, each focusing one portion of this zone, according to the
division shown in figure 8.2.1. In these meetings, experts on biodiversity and
sustainable use of natural resources of the various coastal and marine ecosystems used
the Ecoregional Planning methodology (TNC and WWF, 2006) adapted to the
Systematic Conservation Planning methodology (Margules and Pressey, 2000).
Participants were organized in working groups to define regional conservation targets
and identify their respective threats and conservation goals. The possible databases
containing local and regional data on these conservation targets were also listed. The
NZCM/SBF technical team formed technical partnerships with TNC and CRS/IBAMA
to organize these meetings, which also received local and regional institutional support
at each meeting location. Financial support was provided by TNC, DIFAP/IBAMA, and
SOS Mata Atlântica.
83
Divisão das Regiões de
Trabalho
„
„
„
„
- Norte
- Nordeste
- Sudeste
- Sul
Figure 8.2.1 – Map of the regional division adopted for the Technical
Meetings and Regional Workshops for updating the Priority Areas and
Actions for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from
Biodiversity of the Coastal and Marine Zone.
South Region Technical Meeting
The first technical meeting focused the South Region, and was held on March 9
and 10, 2006, at UFRGS in Porto Alegre, parallel to the technical meeting on the
Pampas Biome. A total of 22 experts from Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina
participated in this meeting (see list of participants in annex 11.7.8) and, as shown in
figure 8.2.1, discussions and definition of targets were limited to the territorial strip
from Arroio Chuí/RS to Santa Marta Cape/SC. The experts, organized in a single
working group, defined 50 regional conservation targets separated into two large groups
(27 ecosystem targets and 23 species targets) and identified their threats. Discussions
were completed during the technical meeting focusing the Southeast/South region. The
meeting on the South Region was supported by TNC, NAPMA/MMA, and UFRGS.
North Region Technical Meeting
The technical meeting focusing the North Region was held from May 24 to 26,
2006, in São Luís/MA, with the participation of 35 experts from the states of Amapá,
Pará, Maranhão, and Piauí (see list of participants in annex 11.7.9). This meeting was
supported by TNC, IBAMA/MA, and São Luís Municipal Government. The experts
defined conservation targets and other parameters that supported the definition of
conservation goals for each target. A total of 74 conservation targets were listed,
organized into two large groups: coastal (17 ecosystem targets and 13 species targets)
and marine (14 ecosystem targets and 30 species targets).
Northeast Region Technical Meeting
84
The third meeting focused the Northeast Region and was held from July 11 to
13, 2006, in Tamandaré/PE, with the participation of 48 experts from seven states
(Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas, Sergipe, and Bahia) (see
list of participants in annex 11.7.10). On the first day, participants were organized in
two working groups (coastal and marine) and defined the conservation targets. The next
two days were used for characterizing the conservation targets and identifying their
main threats. This information was organized to support the definition of conservation
goals for each target. For this meeting, the NZCM received support from TNC,
DIFAP/IBAMA, and CEPENE/IBAMA.
The 72 conservation targets defined by participating experts were organized into
three large groups (22 coastal targets; 17 marine targets; 33 species targets).
Southeast/South Region Technical Meeting
The last technical meeting was held in Teresópolis/RJ, from September 26 to 28,
2006, and had the participation of 72 experts from six states (Espírito Santo, Rio de
Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná, Santa Catarina, and Rio Grande do Sul) (see list of
participants in annex 11.7.11). During the first two days, the participants worked in two
separate groups (Coastal and Oceanic), to prepare the list of conservation targets and
their respective threats. On the third day, participants worked in small groups to
characterize each target and define the criteria (target conservation status and
vulnerability) to be used for determining the conservation goals. For this step, the
NZCM team received support from SOS Mata Atlântica, from the management team of
the Serra dos Órgãos National Park/IBAMA and, again, from TNC.
Experts selected 43 conservation targets, which were organized into two groups
(26 Coastal targets and 17 Oceanic targets). The mangrove experts, in a different
procedure from what was applied for the other regions, decided to subdivide the
Mangrove target (tree feature and tannes feature) into 32 sub-areas, which they
considered deserved differentiated attention.
Adjustment of Conservation Targets and Goals
After four technical meetings with the participation of 177 experts on
biodiversity and sustainable use of natural resources with knowledge on the different
coastal and marine ecosystems, 239 conservation targets were selected, 85 of which are
coastal ecosystems, 55 are marine ecosystems, and 99 are coastal and marine species
targets. It is important to note that many of these targets, especially the ecosystem
targets, are listed as targets in more than one region (e.g.: mangrove, coastal islands,
beaches, exposed rocky coastline, among others). Several species targets were listed as
a single target with the possibility of unfolding into several targets when specific
information becomes available (e.g.: endemic and threatened coral species; threatened
sand banks bird species; threatened marine invertebrate species). This resulted from the
fact that each meeting was an independent event and, for each region, the participating
experts had the freedom to list all targets they deemed relevant, so that at the end of
each event an “ideal” set of targets to be conserved could be obtained.
On the other hand, according to the methodology, the participating experts were
informed that only those conservation targets in the spatial distribution format
(preferably in shapefile format) would be considered for the preparation of the
biological importance map. Thus, the NZCM put great effort into gathering secondary
georeferenced data from the various governmental (federal and state) and private
institutions prior to the technical meetings, starting to compose the Coastal and Marine
Zone Biodiversity Database. During the meetings, experts identified new databases that
85
were incorporated into the Coastal and Marine Zone Biodiversity Database. This
Database was the main source of information for the process to update the Priority
Areas and Actions for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from
Biodiversity of the Brazilian Coastal and Marine Zone.
Another relevant aspect to be considered is the fact that the technical team from
the Coastal and Marine Zone Nucleus decided to map the main coastal ecosystems as a
basis for discussions on this biome, instead of using the Brazilian Biomes Vegetation
Cover Map (MMA 2007), which was the basis for the technical meetings on the other
biomes. Thus, parallel to the meetings, the NZCM technical team, in partnership with
CSR/IBAMA, digitalized restingas (coastal scrub), beaches, salt marshes, mangroves,
estuaries, coastal lagoons, dunes, marshes, and islands along the entire Brazilian coast at
the 1:50,000 scale, based on LANDSAT images from 2000 to 2002. After all these
ecosystems were digitalized, the technical team validated the work by overlapping this
map with the shapefiles obtained from federal and state institutions and from experts
from different states, correcting small distortions and improving quality of the final
map.
The conservation goals for each target were defined using the Ecoregional
Planning methodology (TNC). During the technical meetings, in addition to defining
conservation targets, experts also evaluated the current conservation status and the
vulnerability of each target. For that, the Key Ecological Attributes (KEA) of each
target were defined (biodiversity; connectivity among ecosystems; community structure;
sedimentation regime; among others), selecting characteristics the experts considered
essential for assessing the “biological health” of the target. The next step was to
determine the current status of each target, based on the classification of each KEA and
using the following categories: Very Good (VG); Good (G); Regular (R); Poor (P). This
classification later received numeric values (VG = 4.0; G = 3.5; R = 2.5; P = 1.0). The
mean of the KEAs indicated the current status of each target (from 1.0 to 4.0).
To determine the vulnerability of each target the experts used questionnaires to
define the main threats to each Coastal and Marine target separately. The degree of
influence of each main threat to the KEAs was thus classified (80% of the
appointments) according to the following scale: High (H); Moderate (M); Low (L);
Insignificant (I). This classification was again replaced by numeric values (H = 4.0; M =
3.5; L = 2.5; I = 1.0) and the mean of the KEAs indicated the vulnerability value for the
target. The mean of the Current Status and Vulnerability of each target was calculated
and the means of all targets were distributed to create variation classes. During the
technical meetings, the experts determined the number of goal variation classes (3 or 4),
as well as their minimum and maximum values. It is important to note that the
substitution of the categories by numeric values and the calculation of means was a step
carried out after the technical meetings.
The Biological Importance maps of the three regions (North; Southeast/South;
Northeast) were prepared based on the targets and goals database. For that, 6,000hectare hexagons were used as Planning Units (UPs), generated with the Patch Analyst
extension. Only hexagons inside full protection protected areas had their sides dissolved
to respect the protected area’s limits. The borders of all other categories of protected
areas and indigenous lands were included in the UP database, but the hexagons
intersecting these areas were maintained. The maps of Biological Importance of Coastal
Zones (North; Southeast/South; Northeast) provided to working groups in the technical
meetings resulted from the Irreplaceability Maps generated by C-Plan, which later
informed the preparation of maps containing MARXAN’s Best Solution to reach the
86
conservation goals for all coastal targets. The process for generating maps of Biological
Importance of the Marine Zone was limited to using the Irreplaceability maps generated
by C-Plan.
Despite all effort to provide information to the meetings and the strong
participation of numerous institutions and researchers, it was not possible to consider all
targets included in the regional lists (see list of conservation targets and goals in annex
11.10.7).
Technical Team and Collaborators
Ana Paula Leite Prates (NZCM/ MMA – ZCM General Coordinator) ; Wigold Bertold
Schaffer (NAPMA/MMA – General Coordinator for the Atlantic Forest and Pampas
Biomes); Luis Henrique de Lima (NZCM/ MMA – ZCM Technical Coordinator);
Leandro Baumgarten (NAPMA /MMA – Technical Coordinator for the Atlantic Forest
and Pampas Biomes); Anthony Chatwin (TNC); Lívia de Laila Loiola (NZCM/ MMA);
Daniele Blanc (NZCM/ MMA); Adriana Carvalhal Fonseca (DIREC/IBAMA); Ana
Lídia de Araújo Ramos (CSR/IBAMA); Beatrice Padovani Ferreira (UFPE); Claudia
Cavalcanti
Rocha
Campos
(COFAU/DIFAP/IBAMA);
Eduardo
Godoy
(DIREC/IBAMA); Estevão Vieira Tanajura Carvalho (CSR/IBAMA); Gabriel
Daldegan (TNC); Javier Fawaz (GEF Mangue/MMA); João Luiz Nicolodi (GERCOM/
MMA); Juliana Cristina Fukuda (IBAMA/Maranhão); Luiz Otávio Frota
(DIFAP/IBAMA); Mônica Brick Peres (CEPERG/IBAMA); Raquel Barreto
(CSR/IBAMA); Roberto Sforza (TAMAR/IBAMA); Rogério H. Vereza de Azevedo
(DAP /MMA); Sandro Klippel (IBAMA/RS).
Figure 8.2.2 a
87
Figure 8.2.2 b
88
Figure 8.2.2c
Figure 8.2.2 – Maps of Biological Importance for the Coastal and Marine Zone. (a) North; (b) Northeast;
(c) Southeast/South.
8.3. Regional Workshops
The consolidation of the process to update the Priority Areas and Actions for the
Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from Biodiversity of the Coastal
and Marine Zone was carried out through three regional Workshops. Representatives of
various institutions (federal, state and municipal government; private sector; civil
society organizations; universities; and research centers) were invited to ensure
participation of all sectors of society in the workshops.
For methodological and logistics reasons, the three events involving the Coastal
and Marine Zone were carried out in partnership with those focusing other biomes: the
workshop on the North region was organized in partnership with the Amazon Biome
team; and the workshops on the Northeast and Southeast/South regions were organized
in partnership with the NAPMA/MMA team. Each technical team is described below
and the complete list of participants for each region can be found in annex 11.
89
To support discussions in all three events, a complete database was prepared,
gathering general and specific information on each region:
•
Landsat Image Set from 2000 to 2002: source NASA, MMA, and
CSR/IBAMA.
•
IBGE Cartographic Database – 1:1,000,000 (2001): containing information
on the highway network, hydrography, natural features.
•
IBGE Municipalities Database - 1:500,000 (2001): containing information
on the administrative borders of municipalities.
•
ANA Watershed Database: containing the level 3 watersheds map.
•
Map of the main coastal and marine ecosystems: mangroves, coastal
lagoons, marshes, floodplains, dunes, beaches, restingas (coastal scrub),
coastal and oceanic islands, etc.; interpreted from satellite images in
partnership with CSR/MMA and complemented with information from other
institutions.
•
Map of Priority Areas and Actions for Biodiversity (MMA, 2004).
•
Data from the National Protected Area Database at the federal and state level
(DAP/MMA) and map of indigenous lands.
•
Digitalized map of the REMAC – CENPES/Petrobras Project (1979).
•
Digital Landscape Model from NASA, with 90 m definition.
•
ANP Database: Map of the terrestrial and marine sedimentary basins;
Perforation, Seismic and Production Areas; Areas of Influence with
Vortices; Production Blocks; 8th Round Blocks.
•
Preliminary proposal for the new priority areas: generated through the
analysis of the biological importance map.
•
Biological Importance Map: generated based on the Conservation Targets
and Goals defined by experts during the regional technical meetings.
In addition to the database prepared by MMA, other data provided by
participants during the meetings (e.g.: location of deep water reefs – data from the
National Museum/UFRJ; sponge bank – UFCE data; borders of state or municipal
protected areas not included in the National Protected Area Database; among others)
were also added to the database and assisted the working groups in the identification,
characterization, priority setting, and identification of actions proposed for priority
areas.
North Region Workshop
The first event focused the North Region, and was held from November 6 to 8,
2006, in Belém/PA, with 74 participants representing various institutions from the states
of Amapá, Pará, Maranhão, and Piauí (see list of participants in annex 11.8.11).
Participants were organized into 3 working groups: Amapá and Pará; Maranhão and
Piauí; and Marine Zone.
As previously mentioned this workshop was held in partnership with the
Amazon Biome workshop and received support from the ARPA Project. The main
objective of this partnership was to obtain results expressing and preserving to the
90
highest degree the natural transition process from the Amazon Forest to the Coastal
Zone ecosystems of the Amapá and Pará states.
The regional workshop on the Coastal and Marine Zone of the North Region was
preceded by a one-day preparatory meeting on social requirements of the traditional or
artisanal fishing communities. The objective of this preparatory meeting was to organize
in a single proposal all the requests to create sustainable use protected areas, which were
collected from various organizations: IBAMA/DISAM, ISA, CNS, MONAPE, and
CPP. This meeting was organized mainly by ISA, and received support from the ARPA
Project. The final proposal prepared in this meeting was presented and discussed in the
working groups of the regional workshop and the requests about which consensus was
reached were incorporated to the final scope of the Priority Areas and Actions.
Technical Team
Marcos Reis Rosa (MMA – General Technical Coordinator); Ana Paula Leite Prates
(NZCM/MMA – General Coordinator for the Biome); Luis Henrique de Lima
(NZCM/MMA – Technical Coordinator for the Biome); Sandra Flores Nunes
(NZCM/MMA – Geoprocessing Coordinator); Danielle Blanc (NZCM/SBF Facilitator); Hélio Jorge Cunha (DCBio/MMA – Facilitator); Leonel Graça Generoso
Pereira (SBF/MMA –Facilitator); Luis Otávio Frota (DIFAP/IBAMA – Facilitator);
Paula Hanna Valdujo (NCP/MMA – Facilitator); Roberto Sforza (TAMAR/IBAMA –
Facilitator); Ana Lídia de Araújo Ramos (CSR/IBAMA – Geoprocessing); Raquel
Barreto (CSR/IBAMA - Geoprocessing); Renato Prado dos Santos (SBF/MMA –
Geoprocessing); Daniel de Oliveira Wiechers (DCBio/MMA – Support);
Southeast/South Region Workshop
The second workshop focused the Southeast/South Region and was held from
November 21 to 23, 2006, in Rio de Janeiro/RJ with 133 participants representing
various institutions: federal, state and municipal government; private sector; and civil
society (see list of participants in annex 11.8.8).
As in the North Region Workshop, this event was held in partnership with the
Atlantic Forest and Pampas Biomes workshop, and sought to preserve the natural
transition process between these biomes and the Coastal Zone ecosystems. Participants
of the Southeast/South Region workshop were organized into six working groups based
on states, four of which discussed and defined priorities for the coastal areas (coast of
São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Espírito Santo, Paraná, Santa Catarina, and Rio Grande do
Sul), and two of which focused the marine areas (ZEE south of Chuí/RS up to the Santa
Marta Cape/SC; and from Santa Marta Cape/SC up to the state line between Espírito
Santo and Bahia).
Technical Team of the Southeast/South Region Workshop
Marcos Reis Rosa (MMA – General Technical Coordinator); Ana Paula L. Prates
(NZCM/MMA – ZCM General Coordinator); Wigold Schaffer (NAPMA/MMA –
General Coordinator for the Atlantic Forest and Pampas Biomes); Luis Henrique de
Lima (NZCM/MMA– ZCM Technical Coordinator); Leandro Baumgarten
(NAPMA/MMA - Technical Coordinator for the Atlantic Forest and Pampas Biomes);
Sandra Nunes Flores (NZCM/MMA - Geoprocessing Coordinator); Cristhiane
Holvorcem (NAPMA/MMA - Facilitator); Daniele Blanc (NZCM/MMA - Facilitator);
Gabriel Daldegan (TNC - Geoprocessing); Leonel Graça Generoso Pereira (SBF/MMA
- Facilitator); Luis Fernando Barros (NAPMA/MMA - Facilitator); Maria Carolina
91
Hazim (NZCM/MMA - Facilitator); Marina Landeiro (DCBio/MMA - Facilitator);
Ricardo Brochado Alves da Silva (NAPMA/MMA - Facilitator and Geoprocessing);
Rogério H. Vereza de Azevedo (DAP/MMA - Facilitator and Geoprocessing); Ana
Lídia de Araújo Ramos (CSR/IBAMA - Geoprocessing); Helio Jorge da Cunha
(DCBio/MMA - Facilitator); Raquel Barreto (CSR/IBAMA – Geoprocessing); Renato
Prado dos Santos (SBF/MMA - Geoprocessing); Viviane Mazin (NAPMA/MMA Geoprocessing); Raquel Monti Henkin (SECEX/MMA - Logistics); Francoli Thiago
Reis (DCBio/MMA - Logistics); Daniel de Oliveira Wiechers (DCBio/MMA Logistics).
Northeast Region Workshop
The third and last event on the Coastal and Marine Zone focused the Northeast
Region and was held in Salvador/BA from December 5 to 7, 2006, with 74 participants
from various institutions from the three sectors: federal, state and municipal
government; private sector; and civil society (see list of participants in annex 11.8.9).
The geographical scope included the area from Ceará to Bahia.
As for the Southeast/South Region workshop, seven working groups were
formed to jointly discuss the coastal zone and the Atlantic Forest, five of which focused
the terrestrial ecosystems and two of which focused the marine ecosystems. Among the
groups focusing terrestrial ecosystems (covering the area from the west of Rio Grande
do Norte to Alagoas; from Sergipe to the north of Bahia; from Salvador/BA to
Canavieiras/BA; from Belmonte/BA to the state line with Espírito Santo), only the area
discussed by one group (focusing the area from Ceará to the north of Rio Grande do
Norte) did not contain Atlantic Forest. The marine areas were discussed by two groups:
one covering the ZEE from Ceará to Alagoas; and the other covering the ZEE of
Sergipe and Bahia.
Technical Team of the Northeast Region Workshop
Marcos Reis Rosa (MMA – General Technical Coordinator); Ana Paula L. Prates
(NZCM/MMA – ZCM General Coordinator); Wigold Schaffer (NAPMA/MMA –
General Coordinator for the Atlantic Forest and Pampas Biomes); Luis Henrique de
Lima (NZCM/MMA - ZCM Technical Coordinator); Leandro Baumgarten
(NAPMA/MMA - Technical Coordinator for the Atlantic Forest and Pampas Biomes);
Sandra Nunes Flores (NZCM/MMA - Geoprocessing Coordinator); Cristhiane
Holvorcem (NAPMA/MMA - Facilitator); Daniele Blanc (NZCM/MMA - Facilitator);
Gabriel Daldegan (TNC - Geoprocessing); João Luis F. Ferreira (NZCM/MMA Facilitator); Luis Fernando Barros (NAPMA/MMA - Facilitator); Ricardo Brochado
Alves da Silva (NAPMA/MMA - Facilitator and Geoprocessing); Rogério H. Vereza de
Azevedo (DAP/MMA - Facilitator and Geoprocessing); Ana Lídia de Araújo Ramos
(CSR/IBAMA - Geoprocessing); Helio Jorge da Cunha (DCBio/MMA - Facilitator);
Raquel Barreto (CSR/IBAMA - Geoprocessing); Renato Prado dos Santos (SBF/MMA
– Geoprocessing); Viviane Mazin (NAPMA/MMA - Geoprocessing); Raquel Monti
Henkin (SECEX/MMA - Logistics); Francoli Thiago Reis (DCBio/MMA - Logistics);
Daniel de Oliveira Wiechers (DCBio/MMA - Logistics).
8.4. Results
After 18 months of intensive work, 4 technical meetings and 3 regional
workshops, the process to update the Priority Areas and Actions for the Conservation,
Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from Biodiversity of the Brazilian Coastal and
Marine Zone was concluded (see list of Priority Areas for the Coastal and Marine Zone
92
in annexes 11.9.7 and 11.9.8). As the whole updating process was based on the IBGE
Biomes Map, the areas of the Coastal Zone were discussed and defined in collaboration
with the areas of the biomes with which they have some type of interface.
As shown in table 8.4.1, the priority areas of the Coastal Zone were distributed
among five biomes: Amazon, Cerrado, Caatinga, Atlantic Forest, and Pampas.
Table 8.4.1. – Distribution of priority areas of the Coastal Zone among the five interface biomes
(Amazon; Caatinga; Cerrado; Atlantic Forest; Pampas).
Amazon
110
% of the
Areas
21.7
Atlantic Forest
301
59.3
133,324
30.8
Caatinga
54
10.7
39,119
9.1
Pampas
30
6.1
17,363
4.0
Cerrado
11
2.2
4,010
0.9
TOTAL
506
Biome
Nº of Areas
Area (km2)
% Total Area
238,417
55.2
432,234
The map of the Updated Priority Areas of the Coastal and Marine Zone is
composed by 608 areas, of which 506 are coastal and 102 are marine. When analyzing
the territorial scope of these results, 74.2% of the extension indicated as priority are new
and 25.8% are already under some type of protection (protected area or indigenous
land). In comparison with the 1999 priority-setting effort (Porto Seguro/BA), significant
changes are noted in the number and extension of priority areas, both in the Coastal
Zone and in the Marine Zone.
A significant increase in the number and extension of priority areas for the
Coastal Zone is observed, from 151 areas (147,461 km2) selected in 1999 to 506
(432,234 km2) listed in this process. This is mostly due to two factors: the first is related
to the better quality of current data used in the definition of areas (georeferenced data);
and the second is methodological, since in 1999 the Coastal Zone areas were analyzed
separately from other biomes, without considering the transition zone among them.
The analysis of priority areas for the Marine Zone also presented a significant
increase in the number and extension of priority areas, from 31 areas (944,872 km2) in
1999 to 102 areas (3,344,658 km2) in 2006. The accumulated knowledge and improved
quality of technical information on the marine zone, especially on the continental shelf
and slope (REVIZEE Project; Biota/SP; On-Board Observer Program; among others),
allowed experts and managers to achieve greater detail in the definition of priority areas.
The increase in territorial extension occurred because of the technical decision to adopt
the ZEE limits in the process to define priority areas. Thus, it can be stated that an
extensive zoning and priority-setting for biodiversity conservation was conducted for
the Brazilian ZEE.
The results of the process to update the priority areas of the Coastal and Marine
Zones are presented below. For the Coastal Zone: comparison of the frequency of
biological importance classes among themselves and between the 1999 and 2006
priority-setting processes (Table 8.4.2), comparison of the frequency of priority for
action classes (Table 8.4.4), distribution of the main action indicated to each of the
identified areas (Table 8.4.6), and distribution of all actions indicated to each of the
identified areas (Table 8.4.8). For the Marine Zone: comparison of the frequency of
93
biological importance classes (Table 8.4.3), comparison of the frequency of priority for
action classes (Table 8.4.5), distribution of the main action indicated to each of the
identified areas (Table 8.4.7), and distribution of all actions indicated to each of the
identified areas (Table 8.4.9). The final map of Priority Areas for the Coastal and
Marine Zone is also presented below (Figures 8.4.1 and 8.4.2, and insert to this
publication).
Table 8.4.2. – Distribution of the number and extension of priority areas of the Coastal Zone, by Biological Importance
category, as defined in the 1999 and 2006 priority-setting processes.
New 2006
Biological
Importance
Protected 2006
Total 1999
nº of
areas
Area
(km2)
%
nº of
areas
Area
(km2)
%
nº of
areas
Area
(km2)
%
High
72
69,626
23
39
4,851
20
111
12,643
22
Very High
83
80,061
27
21
13,221
11
104
10,387
21
Extremely High
141
164,095
45
124
93,093
64
265
122,278
52
Insufficiently Known
16
5,845
5
10
1,479
5
26
3,020
5
312
319,627
194
112,644
506
148,327
Total
Table 8.4.3. – Distribution of the number and extension of priority areas of the Marine Zone, by Biological
Importance category, as defined in the 1999 and 2006 priority-setting processes.
Total 1999
Areas 2006
Biological
Importance
High
Very High
Extremely High
Insufficiently Known
Total
Nº of areas
9
19
58
16
102
Area (km2)
234,157
413,116
555,249
2,142,136
3,344,658
%
7
12
17
64
nº of areas
1
8
18
4
31
Area (km2)
102,028
279,944
435,846
140,947
958,766
%
11
29
45
15
Table 8.4.4 – Distribution of the number and extension of priority areas of the Coastal Zone, by Priority for Action
class, as defined in the 2006 priority-setting process.
New 2006
Priority
for Action
Protected 2006
Total 2006
nº of
areas
Area
(km2)
%
nº of
areas
Area
(km2)
%
nº of
areas
Area
(km2)
%
High
66
75,022
23
63
29,322
26
129
104,344
24
Very High
91
90,230
28
55
24,146
21
146
114,376
26
Extremely High
155
154,375
48
76
59,176
53
231
213,551
49
312
319,627
194
112,644
506
432,271
Total
Table 8.4.5 – Distribution of the number and extension of priority areas of the Marine Zone, by Priority for Action
class, as defined in the 2006 priority-setting process.
Total 2006
Priority
for Action
High
Very High
Extremely High
Total
nº of areas
25
Area (km2)
2,106,453
%
63%
36
41
102
745,518
492,687
3,344,658
22%
15%
94
Table 8.4.6 – Distribution of the main priority action indicated to the areas of the Brazilian
Coastal Zone.
Number of
Areas
Area
(km2)
% of the
Total Area
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Area
45
76,853
17.8
Creation of Protected Area – Undefined Category
58
44,530
10.3
Fisheries Planning and Regularization
12
37,404
8.7
Recuperation of Degraded Areas
49
33,237
7.7
Creation of Mosaic/Corridor
42
32,597
7.5
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
42
27,029
6.3
Territorial Planning and Regularization
12
19,297
4.5
Watershed Management
2
14,399
3.3
No information
17
14,296
3.3
Fostering Sustainable Use
9
9,646
2.2
Biological Inventory
16
6,424
1.5
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
3
2,817
0.7
Other Actions
1
1,277
0.3
Recognition of Indigenous/Quilombola Areas
2
429
0.1
Environmental Education
4
322
0.1
NEW AREAS TOTAL
314
320,557
74.2
Areas already under protection
192
111,678
25.8
TOTAL
506
432,234
Priority Action for the Coastal Zone
Table 8.4.7 – Distribution of the main priority action indicated to the areas of the Brazilian
Marine Zone.
Priority Action for the Marine Zone
Fostering Sustainable Use
Fisheries Planning and Regularization
Biological Inventory
Definition of No-Fishing Zones
Creation of Protected Area – Undefined Category
Creation of Mosaic/Corridor
Other Actions
Recuperation of Degraded Areas
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Area
Territorial Planning and Regularization
NEW AREAS TOTAL
Areas already under protection
TOTAL
Number of
Areas
Area (km2)
% of the
Total Area
8
20
12
20
14
6
4
3
1
7
1
96
6
102
1,350,029
677,966
545,453
321,687
157,931
151,062
69,837
23,591
22,858
15,543
1,368
3,337,325
7,333
3,344,658
40.3
20.3
16.3
9.6
4.7
4.5
2.1
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.1
0.2
Table 8.4.8 – Distribution of all actions indicated to the new areas of the Brazilian Coastal Zone.
95
Number of
Areas
Area (km2)
Enforcement
324
267,210
Environmental Education
286
231,233
Biological Inventory
244
216,022
Creation of Mosaic/Corridor
183
197,589
Recuperation of Degraded Areas
225
153,605
Fostering Sustainable Use
141
130,518
Socio-anthropological Studies
101
116,420
Studies on the Physical Environment
128
105,669
Recuperation of Threatened and Overexploited Species
103
101,559
Management of Biological Resources
166
99,847
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Area
53
95,984
Fisheries Planning and Regularization
53
50,785
Creation of Protected Area – Undefined Category
44
34,702
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
35
21,701
Creation of No-Fishing Zone
4
3,205
Type of Priority Action for the Costal Zone
Table 8.4.9 – Distribution of all actions indicated to the new areas of the Brazilian Marine Zone.
Number of
Areas
Area (km2)
Biological Inventory
81
3,179,893
Studies on the Physical Environment
79
3,178,481
Recuperation of Threatened and Overexploited
Species
32
1,732,254
Fostering Sustainable Use
40
1,720,834
Fisheries Planning and Regularization
50
1,278,748
Enforcement
67
1,011,698
Creation of Mosaic/Corridor
34
506,400
Creation of No-Fishing Zone
27
417,886
Environmental Education
29
209,465
Creation of Protected Area - Undefined Category
15
165,116
Socio-anthropological Studies
8
134,570
Management of Biological Resources
18
70,954
Recuperation of Degraded Areas
10
35,616
Creation of Full Protection Protected Area
1
22,858
Creation of Sustainable Use Protected Area
6
11,715
Type of Priority Action for the Marine Zone
96
Figure 8.4.1 – Map of Priority Areas for the Coastal and Marine Zone
97
9. Results
9.1. Overall Results
The process to update the Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use
and Sharing of Benefits from Brazilian Biodiversity resulted in a map and a database
with 2,684 priority areas indicated and accredited by society. Of these, 1,123 are already
under protection (protected areas or indigenous lands), and 1,561 are new proposed
areas. As shown in figure 9.1.1b, the Atlantic Forest and Amazon biomes contain 63%
of all priority areas, with 880 and 824 areas respectively; the Cerrado holds 431 areas,
the Caatinga contains 292, the Pampas holds 105, the Marine Zone has 102, and the
Pantanal has 50, completing the new updated map.
1998/2000 Priority-Setting Process
a
Mata
Atlântica
177 áreas
19,0%
Zona
Costeira
151 áreas
16,2%
Caatinga
82 áreas
8,8%
Cerrado
Amazônia
68 áreas
7,3%
397 áreas
42,7%
Zona
Marinha
Pampa
Pantanal
5 áreas
0,6%
19 áreas
2,1%
31 áreas
3,3%
2005/2006 Priority-Setting Process
b
Cerrado
420 áreas
15,7%
Mata
Atlântica
579 áreas
21,6%
Mata
Atlântica
301 áreas
11,2%
Caatinga
238 áreas
8,9%
Zona
Costeira
506 áreas
18,9%
Am azônia
110 áreas
4,1%
Caatinga
54 áreas
2,0%
Amazônia
714 áreas
26,6%
Pam pa
30 áreas
1,2%
Pampa
Pantanal
50 áreas
1,9%
Zona Marinha
102 áreas
3,7%
Cerrado
11 áreas
0,4%
74 áreas
2,7%
98
Figure 9.1.1 – Comparison of the distribution of priority areas by biome between the (a) 1998/2000 and
(b) 2005/2006 priority-setting processes.
One aspect that stands out in Figure 9.1.1b is the distribution of areas located in
the Coastal Zone. This fact, as previously explained under the Coastal and Marine Zone
section, is a result of the methodology adopted in the process to update the priority
areas, since the limits defined by the Brazilian Biomes Map (IBGE, 2004) were used as
the basis for geographical scope, where the Coastal Zone ecosystems are incorporated to
the biomes present on the Brazilian coastline. Therefore, the priority areas of the
Coastal Zone discussed and defined in the regional workshops were distributed in the
final map according to their association with the five biomes (Atlantic Forest, Amazon,
Caatinga, Cerrado, and Pampas), and represent 18.9% of all priority areas identified by
the updating process. As shown in Figure 9.1.1b, 59.3% of the 506 coastal areas are
associated to the Atlantic Biome, followed by 21.7% associated to the Amazon biome,
10.7% to the Caatinga; 6.1% to the Pampas, and finally 2.2% to the Cerrado.
When comparing the results of the two processes, a significant increase in the
number of areas is noted, growing from 900 priority areas indicated by the 1998/2000
process to 2,683 priority areas indicated by the 2005/2006 process (Figures 9.1.1a and
9.1.1b). This increase may be attributed to the following factors: there was a
quantitative and qualitative improvement in the data provided by researchers, research
centers and public entities during the process to define priority areas; the methodology
used in the process allowed the decisive and important participation of a large number
of experts in the definition of conservation targets and goals, with the use of decisionmaking supporting softwares that assisted in building scenarios; and the participation of
society, adding empirical knowledge to the scientific knowledge of experts for building
this management tool.
Despite the methodological difference in the definition of the priority areas for
the Coastal Zone, the 2005/2006 updating process recorded a significant improvement
in the distribution of priority areas among biomes. According to Figure 9.1.1, of the
current 2,683 priority areas, 26.6% are located in the Amazon biome, 21.6% in the
Atlantic Forest, 18.8% in the Coastal Zone, 15.7% in the Cerrado, and 8.9% in the
Caatinga. In comparison, the 1998/2000 process identified 900 areas for all biomes,
42.7% of which were located in the Amazon biome, 19.0% in the Atlantic Forest,
16.2% in the Coastal Zone, 9% in the Caatinga, and 7% in the Cerrado. These numbers
indicate that, proportionally, there was an increase in the number of areas located in the
Atlantic Forest and Cerrado biomes, and a reduction of this number in the Amazon
biome. The most notable change occurred in the Pampas biome, with an increase from 5
to 74 priority areas.
99
When the indications
to create Full Protection
Protected Areas in each
terrestrial
biome
are
analyzed, it is noted that the
larger areas are located in the
Amazon
biome
(Figure
9.1.2), totaling 207,218 km2.
However, considering the
total percentage of the
biome, the Caatinga and the
Pantanal are the biomes with
the proportionally larger total
area indicated to this
protected area category, with
11.1% and 9.5% of the total
area
of
the
biome,
respectively. (Table 9.1.1).
However, when the
focus of the analysis is the
Figure 9.1.2 – Map of priority areas indicated for the Creation
number of areas indicated
of Full Protection Protected Areas in the terrestrial biomes:
Amazon, Caatinga, Cerrado, Atlantic Forest, Pantanal, and
for the Creation of Full
Pampas.
Protection Protected Areas, it
is noted that, although this
recommendation covers only 3.5% of the total area of the Atlantic Forest, this
percentage represents 50 priority areas, of which 39 were considered of Extremely
High Biological Importance. (Table 9.1.1).
Table 9.1.1 – Distribution of priority areas indicated for the Creation of Full Protection Protected Areas in the terrestrial
biomes: Amazon, Caatinga, Cerrado, Atlantic Forest, Pantanal, and Pampas.
Insufficiently
Total
High
Very High
Extremely High
% of
Known
Area of
the
Biome
the Biome nº of
area
nº of
area
nº of
area
nº of
area
Biome
2
2
2
2
2
(km )
(km )
(km )
(km )
(km )
areas
areas
areas
areas
Amazon
4,245,024
6
38,511
8
43,919
30
124,788
0
0
4.9%
Caatinga
852,261
4
1,489
8
21,908
28
71,231
0
0
11.1%
Cerrado
2,052,708
5
15,964
16
40,119
29
75,779
1
7,635
6.8%
Atlantic Forest
1,129,760
8
740
12
3,948
39
34,374
3
529
3.5%
Pantanal
151,353
1
1,558
0
0
5
12,747
0
0
9.5%
Pampas
178,820
1
239
1
133
11
8,746
0
0
5.1%
100
Concerning the indications to Create Sustainable Use Protected Areas, the
Amazon biome recorded the largest land area and also the larger number of priority
areas with this recommendation, totaling 437,273 km2 (10.3% of the total area of the
biome) distributed in 97 areas (Figure 9.1.3 and Table 9.1.2).
Although the results of
the
analysis
of
the
recommendation to Create
Sustainable Use Protected
Areas in the Cerrado and
Atlantic Forest areas were not
as expressive as for the
Amazon, both in extension
(105,911 km2 and 16,641
km2) and in the number of
areas (30 and 37 areas) (Table
9.1.2), the classification of
these areas in the extremely
high biological importance
category (47 in the Amazon;
17 in the Cerrado; 14 in the
Atlantic Forest), justifies the
general concerns expressed by
society and corroborates the
recommendations.
Table 9.1.2 – Distribution of priority areas
indicated for the Creation of Sustainable Use
Protected Areas in the terrestrial biomes:
Amazon, Caatinga, Cerrado, Atlantic Forest,
Pantanal, and Pampas.
Figure 9.1.3 – Map of priority areas indicated for the Creation
of Sustainable Use Protected Areas in the terrestrial biomes:
Amazon, Caatinga, Cerrado, Atlantic Forest, Pantanal, and
Pampas.
Insufficiently
Known
nº of
area
(km2)
areas
Total
Area of
the Biome
(km2)
nº of
areas
area
(km2)
nº of
areas
area
(km2)
nº of
areas
area
(km2)
Amazon
4,245,024
17
75,115
30
154,627
47
182,652
3
24,879
10.3%
Caatinga
852,261
3
9,855
0
0
5
8,679
0
0
2.2%
Cerrado
2,052,708
2
3,812
9
27,595
17
73,476
2
1,028
5.2%
Atlantic Forest
1,129,760
4
1,282
15
6,825
14
7,850
4
684
1.5%
Pantanal
151,353
1
113
1
724
3
7,811
0
0
5.7%
Pampas
178,820
1
59
2
1,012
3
3,288
0
0
2.4%
Biome
High
Very High
Extremely High
101
% of
the
Biome
The recommendations for the Creation of Protected Area (category to be
defined) indicate that, for one or more reasons, there was no certainty to previously
define the category of the protected area. Figure 9.1.4 clearly shows that the Cerrado
and Amazon biomes had the largest land area receiving this recommendation, totaling
171,079 km2 and 164,586 km2, respectively.
The distribution of this
action (creation of protected
area - category to be
defined) relative to the total
area of each biome was more
significant in the Caatinga and
Pampas, with 13.5% and
10.5% of the total area of the
biome, respectively (Table
9.1.3).
Although with less
significant results concerning
land area and distribution, the
recommendation
for
the
creation of protected area category to be defined was
made for 76 priority areas of
the Atlantic Forest, 41 of
which were classified as of
extremely high biological
importance (Table 9.1.3).
Figure 9.1.4 – Map of priority areas indicated for the Creation
of Protected Areas (category to be defined) in the terrestrial
These results, combined with
biomes: Amazon, Caatinga, Cerrado, Atlantic Forest, Pantanal,
the analysis of the previous
and Pampas.
two recommended actions for
the creation of protected
areas, strengthen the need to
conserve the Atlantic Forest remnants.
Table 9.1.3 – Distribution of priority areas indicated for the Creation of Protected Areas (category to be defined) in the
terrestrial biomes: Amazon, Caatinga, Cerrado, Atlantic Forest, Pantanal, and Pampas.
Extremely
High
nº of
area
(km2)
areas
Insufficiently
Known
nº of
area
(km2)
areas
Total
Area of
the Biome
(km2)
nº of
areas
area
(km2)
nº of
areas
area
(km2)
Amazon
4,245,024
5
7,877
9
90,999
11
65,685
0
0
3.9%
Caatinga
852,261
2
11,430
18
32,052
19
56,454
7
15,360
13.5%
Cerrado
2,052,708
5
18,182
9
56,721
24
96,137
1
55
8.3%
Atlantic Forest
1,129,760
12
7,442
18
17,480
41
44,917
5
869
6.3%
Pantanal
151,353
2
2,890
3
3,490
3
3,651
0
0
6.6%
Pampas
178,820
2
733
6
7,120
11
10,485
0
0
10.3%
Biome
High
Very High
% of
the
Biome
102
Considering only the land area, figure 9.1.5 shows that the Cerrado and the
Amazon were the two biomes where the priority action for the recuperation of
degraded areas covered the
largest extension, totaling
134,472 km2 and 111,218 km2,
respectively. Although these
are the largest absolute
numbers, they represent a
small portion of the total area
of the biome, 6.6% of the
Cerrado and only 2.6% of the
Amazon (Table 9.1.4).
Focusing the number of
priority areas, it can be noted
that 84 priority areas of the
Atlantic Forest received the
recommendation of actions for
the recuperation of habitats
(Table 9.1.4). The same
recommendation was made to
52 areas of the Caatinga and 42
areas of the Cerrado, showing
the need for recuperation
actions
that
may
be
complemented by the creation
of mosaics and/or Ecological
Corridors.
Figure 9.1.5 – Map of priority areas indicated for the
Recuperation of Degraded Areas in the terrestrial biomes:
Amazon, Caatinga, Cerrado, Atlantic Forest, Pantanal, and
Pampas.
Table 9.1.4 – Distribution of priority areas indicated for the Recuperation of Degraded Areas in the terrestrial biomes:
Amazon, Caatinga, Cerrado, Atlantic Forest, Pantanal, and Pampas.
Extremely
High
nº of
area
(km2)
areas
Insufficiently
Known
nº of
area
(km2)
areas
Total
Area of
the Biome
(km2)
nº of
areas
area
(km2)
nº of
areas
area
(km2)
Amazon
4,245,024
12
26,211
7
24,978
10
50,103
2
9,926
2.6%
Caatinga
852,261
17
25,559
19
31,514
12
11,125
4
12,246
9.4%
Cerrado
2,052,708
10
29,596
14
52,361
18
52,515
0
0
6.6%
Atlantic Forest
1,129,760
21
4,673
39
33,092
21
8,280
3
543
4.1%
Pantanal
151,353
3
3,659
2
1,306
4
7,206
0
0
8.0%
Pampas
178,820
3
3,876
4
3,143
6
3,728
0
0
6.0%
Biome
High
Very High
103
% of
the
Biome
The distribution of the areas indicated for fisheries planning and
regularization or for the creation of no-fishing zones, with a few exceptions, are
located along the entire coastal and marine zone (Figure 9.1.6) and, generally, given the
nature of the recommended actions, cover extensive areas. There are twelve of these
areas distributed along the
west region and coastal zone
of the Amazon, covering
approximately 2.0% of the
biome’s area. In the Caatinga
and Atlantic Forest, these
areas are limited to the coastal
zone, covering 1.4% and 0.7%
of each biome, respectively.
As shown in Table
9.1.5, the Marine Zone was
the main biome targeted by
recommendations
for
fisheries
planning
and
regularization and/or for the
creation of no-fishing zones,
with indication of these
actions for 40 of its priority
areas, covering 27% of its
entire size, or 999,652 km2. It
is important to note that 26 of
these 40 areas were classified
as being of extremely high
biological importance.
Figure 9.1.6 – Map of priority areas indicated for Fisheries
Planning and Regularization or Creation of No-Fishing Zones in
the biomes: Amazon, Caatinga, Atlantic Forest, and Marine
Zone.
Table 9.1.5 – Distribution of priority areas indicated for Fisheries Planning and Regularization or Creation of No-Fishing
Zones in the biomes: Amazon, Caatinga, Atlantic Forest, and Marine Zone.
Insufficiently
Known
nº of
area
(km2)
areas
Total
Area of
the Biome
(km2)
nº of
areas
area
(km2)
nº of
areas
area
(km2)
nº of
areas
area
(km2)
Amazon
4,245,024
0
0
4
44,799
8
39,063
0
0
2.0%
Caatinga
852,261
2
11,923
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.4%
Atlantic Forest
1,129,760
3
2,342
1
258
2
5011
0
0
0.7%
Marine Zone
3,695,900
4
215,784
7
235,110
26
335,851
3
212,907
27.0%
Biome
High
Very High
Extremely High
104
% of
the
Biome
10. References
AB’SÁBER, A.N. 1977. Os domínios morfoclimáticos da América do Sul.
Geomorfologia, 52: 1-21.
AGUIAR, L. M. S. 2000. Comunidades de morcegos do Cerrado no Brasil Central.
Departamento de Ecologia – Universidade de Brasília. Brasília. 162pp.
AGUIAR, L. M. S., MACHADO, R. B. and MARINHO-FILHO, J. 2004. A diversidade
biológica do Cerrado. In: Aguiar, L. M. S. and Camargo, A. (eds.). Ecologia e
caracterização do Cerrado. Embrapa – Cerrados. Brasília. pp. 19-42.
ALHO, C. J. R. and LACHER Jr., T. E. 1991. Mammalian conservation in the Pantanal
of Brazil. In: MARES, M. A. and SCHMIDLY, D. J. (eds.). Latin American
mammalogy: history, biodiversity and conservation. University of
Oklahoma Press. EUA. pp. 280-294.
ALHO, C. J. R., LACHER Jr., T. E., and GONÇALVES, H. C. 1988. Environmental
degradation in the Pantanal ecosystem of Brazil. BioScience, 38: 164-171.
ANDRADE LIMA, D. 1981. The caatingas dominium. Revista Brasileira de
Botânica, 4: 149-153.
ANTAS, P. T. Z. 1994. Migration and other movements among the lower Paraná River
valley wetland, Argentina, and the south Brazil/Pantanal wetlands. Bird
Conservation International, 4:181-190.
AYRES, J. M. C. and CLUTTON BROCK, T. H. 1992. River boundaries and species
range size in Amazonian primates. American Naturalist, 140: 531-537.
BALL, I. and POSSINGHAM, H. 2000. Marxan (Marine Reserve Design using
Spatially Explicit Annealing). V 1.8.2. Manual, 70 p.
BEHLING, H., PILLAR, V. D., ORLÓCI, L., and BAUERMANN, S. G. 2004. Late
Quaternary Araucaria forest, grassland (campos), fire and climate dynamics,
studied by high-resolution pollen, charcoal and multivariate analysis of the
Cambará do Sul core in southern Brazil. Palaeogegraphy, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology, 203: 277–297.
BEHLING, H., PILLAR, V. D., and BAUERMANN, S. G. 2005. Late Quaternary
grassland (Campos), gallery forest, fire and climate dynamics, studied by
pollen, charcoal and multivariate analysis of the São Francisco de Assis core in
western Rio Grande do Sul (southern Brazil). Review of Palaeobotany and
Palynology, 133: 235–248.
BILENCA, D. and MIÑARRO, F. 2004. Identificación de Areas Valiosas de Pastizal
en las Pampas y Campos de Argentina Uruguay y sur de Brasil. J. M.
Kaplan Fund – Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina. Available at:
http://www.yenys.com.ar/pastizales/
105
BORGES, S. H., COHN-HAFT, M., CARVALHAES, A. M. P., HENRIQUES, L. M.,
PACHECO, J. F., and WHITTAKER, A. 2001. Birds of Jaú National Park,
Brazilian Amazon: species check-list, biogeography and conservation.
Ornitologia Neotropical, Canadá, 12: 109-140.
BRITSKI, H.A., SILIMON, K.Z.S., and LOPES, B.S. 1999. Peixes do Pantanal.
Manual de identificação. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária,
Serviço de Produção de Informação (EMBRAPA-SPI), Brasília, e Centro de
Pesquisa Agropecuária do Pantanal (EMBRAPA-CPAP), Corumbá, Brasil.
CASTELLETTI, C.H.M., SILVA, J.M.C., TABARELLI, M., and SANTOS A.M.M.
2003. Quanto ainda resta da Caatinga? In: Leal, I. R.; Tabarelli, M. e Silva, J.
M. C. (eds.). Uma estimativa preliminar. Ecologia e Conservação da
Caatinga. Recife, Editora Universitária: 719 – 734.
COHN-HAFT, M., NAKA, L. N., and Fernandes, A. M. (no prelo). Padrões de
distribuição da avifauna da várzea do Rio Solimões/Amazonas. In: Albernaz,
A. L. (org) Bases Científicas para a Conservação da Várzea: Identificação
e Caracterização de Regiões Biogeográficas e Proposta de Áreas para a
Conservação. ProVárzea - IBAMA. Manaus/AM.
COLLI, G. R., BASTOS, R. P., and ARAÚJO, A. B. 2002. The character and dynamics
of the Cerrado herpetofauna. In: Oliveira, P.S. e Marquis, R.J. (eds.). The
Cerrados of Brazil. Ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna.
pp. 223-241. Columbia University Press, New York.
COSTA, E. A. and FIGUEIREDO JR, A. G. 1998. Echo-character and sedimentary
processes on the Amazon continental shelf. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc, 70 (2):
187 – 200.
CRACRAFT, J. 1985. Historical biogeography and patterns of differentiation within the
South American areas of endemism. Ornithological Monographs, 36: 49-84.
DIEA
2003.
Censo
Nacional
Agropecuario
http://www.mgap.gub.uy/diea/censo2000
2000.
Available
at:
EITEN, G. 1977. Delimitação do conceito de Cerrado. Arquivos do Jardim Botânico,
Rio de Janeiro. 21: 125-134.
_____. 1982. Brazilian Savannas. In: Huntley, B.J. and Walker, B.H. (eds.). Ecology of
tropical savannas. Ecological Studies, New York, Spring-Verlag. 42: 25-47.
EL-ROBRINI, M., FARIA, L. E. C., TORRES, A. M., SOUZA, F. P. W. M., and
SILVA, M. S. 1992. Deposição e assoreamento das Rias do Nordeste do
Estado do Pará (Brasil). In: Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia, 37, 1992, São
Paulo. Resumo, p. 79-80.
EMBRAPA. 2000. ZANE DIGITAL – Zoneamento Agroecológico do Nordeste do
Brasil. EMBRAPA.
106
FEARNSIDE, P. M. 2006. A Floresta Amazônica nas Mudanças Globais. Manaus,
INPA, 134p.
FERREIRA, L. V., VENTICINQUE, E. M., and ALMEIDA, S. 2005. O desmatamento
na Amazônia e a importância das áreas protegidas. Estudos Avançados,
19(53): 157-166.
FONSECA, G. A. B. da, HERRMANN, G., LEITE, Y., MITTERMEIER, R. A.,
RYLANDS, A. B., and PATTON, J. L. 1996. Lista anotada dos mamíferos
do Brasil. Conservation International, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.
FUNDAÇÃO BIODIVERSITAS. 2003. Lista da fauna brasileira ameaçada de
extinção. Fundação Biodiversitas, Belo Horizonte, Brasil. Avaliable at:
http://www.biodiversitas.org.br.
FUNDAÇÃO PRÓ-NATUREZA, CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL DO
BRASIL, FUNDAÇÃO BIODIVERSITAS, and UNIVERSIDADE DE
BRASÍLIA. 1999. Avaliação e ações prioritárias para a conservação da
biodiversidade do Cerrado e Pantanal. Secretaria de Biodiversidade e
Florestas (SBF), Ministério do Meio Ambiente (MMA), Brasília.
GALVÃO, W. S. and MENESES, P. R. 2005. Avaliação dos sistemas de classificação e
codificação das bacias hidrográficas brasileiras para fins de planejamento de
redes hidrométricas. Anais XII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento
Remoto, pp 2511-2518, Goiânia, 16-21 abril 2005, INPE.
GARDA, E. C. 1996. Atlas do meio ambiente do Brasil. Brasília, Editora Terra Viva.
GOEDERT, W. 1990. Estratégias de manejo das savanas. In: Sarmiento, G. (ed.). Las
sabanas americanas: aspectos de su biogeografia, ecologia y utilización. pp.
191-218. Acta Científica Venezolana.
GROGAN, J., BARRETO, P., and VERÍSSIMO, A. 2002. Mogno na Amazônia
Brasileira: Ecologia e Perspectivas de Manejo. Belém, Imazon, 40p.
HAFFER, J. 1992. On the "river effect" in some forest birds of Southern Amazonia.
Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, serie Zoologia 8: 217-245.
HAFFER, J. 1985. Avian zoogeography of the neotropical lowlands. Ornithological
Monographs, 36: 113-145.
HAMILTON, S. K., SIPPEL, S. J. E MELACK, and J. M. 1996. Inundation patterns in
the Pantanal wetland of South America determined from passive microwave
remote sensing, Arch. Hydrobiol., 137: 1 – 23,
HARRIS, M. B., TOMAS, W. M, MOURÃO, G., SILVA, C. J., GUIMARÃES, E.,
SONODA, F., and FACHIM, E. 2005. Desafios para proteger o Pantanal
brasileiro: ameaças e iniciativas em conservação. Megadiversidade,
1(1):1565-164.
107
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 2004. 2004 IUCN red list of threatened species. Species
Survival Commission (SSC), IUCN – The World Conservation Union,
Cambridge, United Kingdom and Gland, Switzerland. Avaliable at:
http://www.redlist.org.
HOFFMANN, W. A. and MOREIRA, A. G. 2002. The role of fire in population
dynamics of woody plants. In: Oliveira, P.S. and Marquis, R.J. (eds.). The
Cerrado of Brazil. Ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. pp.
159-177. Columbia University Press, Nova York.
IBAMA - Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis .
2004. Estatísticas sobre Unidades de Conservação nos Biomas Brasileiros.
Avaliable at: http://www.ibama.gov.br.
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 1993. Mapa da vegetação
brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, IBGE.
_____ - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 1996. Censo Agropecuário.
Avaliable at: http://www.ibge.net/ibge/default.php.
_____ - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2004a. Mapa de Biomas do
Brasil. Avaliable at: www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/default_prod.
shtm#USO
_____ - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2004b. Nota Técnica do Mapa
de Biomas do Brasil. Avaliable at: http://www.ibge.gov.br/ home/geociencias/
default_prod.shtm#MAPAS.
_____ - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2006. Censo Agropecuário.
Avaliable at: http://www.ibge.net/ibge/default.php.
INPE/OBT - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais-Coordenação-Geral de
Observação da Terra. 2007. Projeto PRODES - Monitoramento sistemático
do desflorestamento da Amazônia, utilizando imagens de sensoriamento
remoto e técnicas de Processamento Digital de Imagens. Avaliable at:
http://www.dpi.inpe.br/ prodesdigital/prodesd.html
ISA - Instituto Socioambiental, IPAM - Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia,
GTA - Grupo de Trabalho Amazônico, ISPN - Instituto Sociedade População e
Natureza, IMAZON - Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia, and
CI – Conservação Internacional Brasil. 2001. Biodiversidade na Amazônia
Brasileira: Avaliação e Ações Prioritárias para a Conservação, Uso
Sustentável e Repartição de Benefícios. Capobianco, J.P.R.; Veríssimo, A.;
Moreira, A.; Sawyer, D.; Santos, I., and Pinto, L.P. (orgs.). São Paulo, Editora
Estação Liberdade e Instituto Socioambiental, 540pp.
IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2006. Global Amphibian
Assessment. <www.globalamphibians.org>.
108
JUNK, W. J. and SILVA, C. da. 1999. O conceito do pulso de inundação e suas
implicações para o Pantanal de Mato Grosso. In: II Simpósio sobre Recursos
Naturais e Sócio-econômicos do Pantanal: Manejo e Conservação. pp. 1728. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa Pantanal),
Corumbá, Brasil.
KLINK, C. A. and MACHADO, R. B. 2005. A conservação do Cerrado brasileiro.
Megadiversidade, 1(1):147-155.
KLINK, C. A. and MOREIRA, A. G. 2002. Past and current human occupation and
land-use. In: Oliveira, P. S. and Marquis, R. J (eds.). The Cerrado of Brazil.
Ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. pp. 69-88. Columbia
University Press, New York.
KNOPPERS, B., EKAU, W., FIGUEIREDO JR, A. G., and SOARES-GOMES, A.
2002. Zona Costeira e Plataforma Continental do Brasil. In: Crespo Pereira, R.
and Soares-Gomes, A. Biologia Marinha. Editora Interciência, Rio de Janeiro,
382 pp.
KRUG, T., FIGUEIREDO, H., SANO, E., ALMEIDA, C., SANTOS, J., MIRANDA,
H.S., SATO, N., and ANDRADE, S. 2002. Emissões de gases de efeito estufa
da queima de biomassa no Cerrado não antrópico utilizando dados orbitais.
Primeiro inventário brasileiro de emissões antrópicas de gases de efeito
estufa – relatórios de referência. Ministério de Ciência e Tecnologia (MCT),
Brasília.
KUEHL, S. A., DEMASTER, D. J., and NITTROUER, C. A. 1986. Nature of sediment
accumulation on the Amazon continental shelf. Continent. Shelf Res., 6: 209225.
LABOREL, J. 1969. Madréporaires et Hydrocoralliaires Récifaux dês Cotes
Brésiliennes: systématique, écologie, répartition verticale et géographique.
Annals Inst. Océanogr, Paris. 47: 171-229.
LEÃO, Z. 1994. The coral reefs of Southern Bahia. pp 151-159. In: Hetzel, B. and
Castro, C. B. Corals of Southern Bahia. Nova Fronteira, Rio de Janeiro,
189pp.
MACHADO, R. B., RAMOS NETO, M. B., HARRIS, M. B., LOURIVAL, R., and
AGUIAR, L .M. S.. 2004b. Análise de lacunas de proteção da biodiversidade
no Cerrado. In: Anais IV Congresso Brasileiro de Unidades de
Conservação. pp. 29-38. Fundação O Boticário de Proteção à Natureza,
Curitiba, Brasil.
MACHADO, R. B., RAMOS NETO, M. B., PEREIRA, P., CALDAS, E.,
GONÇALVES, D., SANTOS, N., TABOR, K., and STEININGER, M.. 2004a.
Estimativas de perda da área do Cerrado brasileiro. Conservation
International do Brasil, Brasília.
109
MAIDA, M. and. FERREIRA, B. P. 1997. Coral reefs of Brazil: an overview. pp. 26374. Vol. 1. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Coral Reef Symposium.
MARES, M. A., WILLIG, M. R., STREILEIN, K. E. and LACHER Jr, T. E. 1981. The
mammals of northeastern Brazil: a preliminary assessment. Annals of the
Carnegie Museum, 50: 81-137
.
MARGULES, C. R. and PRESSEY, R. L. 2000. Systematic conservation planning.
Nature, 405, 243–253.
MARINHO FILHO, J., RODRIGUES, F. H. G. and JUAREZ, K. M. 2002. The Cerrado
mammals: diversity, ecology, and natural history. In: Oliveira, P.S. and
Marquis, R.J. (eds.). The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and natural history of
a neotropical savanna. pp. 266-284. Columbia University Press, New York.
MÉDRI, I. M. and MOURÃO, G. 2004. A fauna do Pantanal. Ação Ambiental: 14-17.
MENDONÇA, R., FELFILI, J., WALTER, B., SILVA JR, J. C., REZENDE, A.,
FILGUEIRAS, T., and NOGUEIRA, P. 1998. Flora vascular do Cerrado. In:
Sano, S. and Almeida, S. (eds.). Cerrado. Ambiente e flora. pp. 288-556.
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária – Embrapa - Cerrados,
Planaltina, Brasil.
MITTERMEIER, R. A., MITTERMEIER, C. G., BROOKS, T. M., PILGRIM, J. D.,
KONSTANT, W. R., FONSECA, G. A. B. da, and KORMOS, C. 2003.
Wilderness and biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, 100: 10309-10313.
MMA - Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 1998. Primeiro relatório nacional para a
Convenção Sobre Diversidade Biológica: Brasil. Brasília, MMA.
_____ - Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 2002a. Avaliação e ações prioritárias para a
conservação da biodiversidade das zonas costeira e marinha. Fundação
Bio-RIO, SECTAM, IDEMA, SNE, Brasília. 72pp. CD-Rom.
_____ - Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 2002b. Biodiversidade Brasileira: Avaliação e
Identificação de Áreas Prioritárias para Conservação, Utilização Sustentável e
Repartição de Benefícios da Biodiversidade Brasileira. Série Biodiversidade
n° 5. 404pp.
_____ - Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 2003. Lista Nacional das Espécies da Fauna
Brasileira Ameaçadas de Extinção. Instrução Normativa n°03, de 26 de maio
de 2003.
_____ - Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 2007. Programa Nacional de Gerenciamento
Costeiro (GERCO). Avaliable at: http://www.mma.gov.br. Rev. abril 2007.
_____ - Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 2007. Mapa de Cobertura Vegetal dos Biomas
Brasileiros. Avaliable at: http://www.mma.gov.br/portalbio.
110
MMA - Ministério do Meio Ambiente e ISA – Instituto Socioambiental. 2001.
Avaliação e Identificação de Ações Prioritárias para a Conservação, Utilização
Sustentável e Repartição dos Benefícios da Biodiversidade na Amazônia
Brasileira. Brasilia, SBF/MMA, 144pp, CD-ROM.
MOURÃO, G.; COUTINHO, M.; MAURO, R.; CAMPOS, Z.,. TOMÁS, W., and
MAGNUSSON, W. 2000. Aerial surveys of caiman, marsh deer and pampas
deer in the Pantanal wetland of Brazil. Biological Conservation, 92: 175-183.
MUEHE, D. 2001. O litoral brasileiro e sua compartimentação. In: Cunha, S. B. da and
Guerra, A. J. T. (orgs). Geomorfologia do Brasil. 2ª Ed. Rio de Janeiro:
Bertrand Brasil, p. 316 – 349.
MÜLLER, C. 2003. Expansion and modernization of agriculture in the Cerrado – the
case of soybeans in Brazil’s center-West. Department of Economics
Working Paper, 306, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília.
MYERS, N., MITTERMEIER, R. A., MITTERMEIER, C. G.; FONSECA, G. A. B. da,
and KENT, J.. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature,
403: 853-858.
NABINGER, C., de MORAES, A., and MARASCHIN, G.E. 2000. Campos in southern
Brazil. In: Lelaire, G., Hodgson, J., de Moraes, A., Carvalho, P.C.F., and
Nabinger, C. (eds.) Grassland ecophysiology and grazzing ecology.
Cambridge: CABI Publishing. cap.18, p.355-376.
NELSON, B.W.; ALBERNAZ, A.L., and SOARES-FILHO, B. 2006. Estratégias de
Conservação para o Programa ARPA. Relatório Técnico. Programa ARPA,
Brasilia, 69p.
NPWS-NSW - National Parks and Wildlife Service-New South Wales. 2003. C-Plan:
Conservation Planning Software. Version 3.20. Armidale, NSW
NUNES, A. P. and TOMAS, W. M. 2004. Aves migratórias ocorrentes no Pantanal:
caracterização e conservação. Série Documentos, Embrapa Pantanal, 62: 1-25.
OLIVEIRA FILHO, A. T., and FONTES, M. A. L. 2000. Patterns of floristic
differentiation among Atlantic forests in southeastern Brazil and the influence
climate. Biotropica, Washington, D. C., v. 32, n.4b, p. 793-810,
OLIVEIRA, J. A., GONÇALVES, P. R., and BONVICINO, C. R. 2003. Mamíferos da
Caatinga. In: Leal, I. R., Tabarelli, M., and Silva, J.M.C. (eds.). Ecologia e
Conservação da Caatinga. Recife, Editora Universitária. pp. 271-336.
OLIVEIRA, M. D. and CALHEIROS, D. F. 2000. Flood pulse influence on
phytoplankton communities of the south Pantanal floodplain, Brazil.
Hydrobiologia 427: 101-112.
111
OLIVEIRA, P. S. and MARQUIS, R. J. (eds.). 2002. The Cerrados of Brazil. Ecology
and natural history of a neotropical savanna. Columbia University Press, New
York.
PERES, C. A. 2005. Why we need megareserves in Amazonia. Conservation Biology
19(3): 728-733.
POTT, A. and ADÁMOLI, J. 1999. Unidades de vegetação do Pantanal dos Paiaguás.
In: II Simpósio sobre Recursos Naturais e Sócio-econômicos do Pantanal:
Manejo e Conservação. pp. 183-202. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa
Agropecuária (Embrapa Pantanal), Corumbá, Brasil.
PRADO, D. E. 2003. As Caatingas da América do Sul. In: Leal, I. R., Tabarelli, M., and
SILVA, J. M. C. (eds.). Ecologia e Conservação da Caatinga. Recife, Editora
Universitária. p. 3-74.
PRATES, A. P. L. (ed.). 2006. 2ª ed. Atlas dos Recifes de Coral nas Unidades de
Conservação Brasileiras. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília. 232p.
PURVIS, A., GITTLEMAN, J. L., COWLISHAW, G. and MACE, G.M. 2000.
Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proceedings of the Royal
Society of London Series B- Biological Sciences, 267: 1947-1952.
REAKA-KUDLA, M. L. 1997. The global biodiversity of coral reefs: a comparison
with rain forests. pp. 83-108. In: Reaka-Kudla, M. L., Wilson, E. D and
Wilson, E. O. (eds.) Biodiversity II: Understanding and protecting our
biological resources. J. H. Press. Washington, D. C. 549 pp.
REDFORD, K. H. and FONSECA, G. A. B. da. 1986. The role of gallery forests in the
zoogeography of the Cerrado’s non-volant mammalian fauna. Biotropica, 18:
126-135.
RIBEIRO, J. F., SANO, S. M., and da SILVA, J. A.. 1981. Chave preliminar de
identificação dos tipos fisionômicos da vegetação do Cerrado. pp. 124-133 In:
Anais do XXXII Congresso Nacional de Botânica. Sociedade Botânica do
Brasil, Teresina, Brasil.
RIZZINI, C.T. 1963. Nota prévia sobre a divisão fitogeográfica do Brasil. Revista
Brasileira de Geografia 25: 3-64.
RODRIGUES, A. S. L., ANDELMAN, S. J., BAKARR, M. I., BOITANI, L.,
BROOKS, T. M., COWLING, R. M., FISHPOOL, L. D. C., FONSECA, G. A.
B. da, GASTON, K. J., HOFFMANN, M., LONG, J., MARGUET, P. A.,
PILGRIM, J. D., PRESSEY, R. L., SCHIPPER, J., SECHREST, W.,
STUART, S. N., UNDERHILL, L. G., WALKER, R.W., WATTS, M. E. J.,
and YAN, X. 2003. Global Gap Analysis: towards a representative network
of protected areas. Washington D.C., Conservation International.
112
RODRIGUES, M. T. 1984. Uma nova espécie brasileira de Tropidurus com crista
dorsal (Sauria, Iguanidae). Papéis Avulsos do Departamento de Zoologia,
São Paulo 35: 361-366.
RODRIGUES, M. T. 1987. Sistemática, ecologia e zoogeografia dos Tropidurus do
grupo Torquatus ao sul do rio Amazonas (Sauria, Iguanidae). Arquivos de
Zoologia do Estado de São Paulo, 31: 105-203.
RODRIGUES, M. T. 1988. Distribution of lizards of the genus Tropidurus in Brazil
(Sauria, Iguanidae). In: Proceedings of a workshop on neotropical
distribution patterns. Heyer, W. R. and Vanzolini, P. E. (eds.). Academia
Brasileira de Ciências, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: 305-315.
RODRIGUES, M. T. 1996. Lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians from the Quaternary
sand dunes of the Middle Rio São Francisco: Bahia: Brazil. Journal of
Herpetology 30: 513-523.
ROSA, R. S., MENEZES, N. A., BRITSKI, H. A., COSTA, W. J. E. M., and GROTH,
F. 2003. Diversidade, padrões de distribuição e conservação dos peixes da
Caatinga. In: Leal, I. R., Tabarelli, M., and Silva, J. M. C. (eds.). Ecologia e
Conservação da Caatinga. Recife, Editora Universitária. p. 3-74.
ROSSI-WONGTSCHOWSKI, C. L. D. B., VALENTIN, J. L., JABLONSKI, S.,
AMARAL, A. C. Z., HAZIN, F. H. V., and EL-ROBRINI, M. 2006. Ambiente
Marinho. In: Programa REVIZEE – Relatório Executivo: Avaliação do
potencial sustentável de recursos vivos na Zona Econômica Exclusiva do
Brasil. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 279pp.
SALAZAR, L. F, NOBRE, C. A., and OYAMA, M. D. (no prelo) Climatic change
consequences on the biome distribution in tropical South America.
Geophysical Research Letters.
SANDERSON, E. W., CHETKIEWICZ, C. L. B., MEDELLIN, R. A, RABINOWITZ,
A., REDFORD, K. H., ROBINSON, J. G., and TABER, A. B. 2002. Un
análisis geográfico del estado de conservación y distribución de los jaguars
através de su área de distribución. In: Medellín, R. A., Equihua, C.,
Chetkiewicz, C. L. B., Crawshaw JR, P. G., Rabinowitz, A.,. Redford, K. H,
Robinson, J. G., Sanderson, E. W., and Taber, A. B. (eds.). El jaguar en el
nuevo milenio. pp. 551-560. Fondo de Cultura Econômica, Universidad
Nacional Autônoma de México, México e Wildlife Conservation Society,
Nova York.
SICK, H. 1965. A fauna do Cerrado. Arq. Zool., São Paulo 12: 233-335.
SILVA, J. F.; FARIÑAS, M. R.; FELFILI, J. M., and KLINK, C. A. 2006. Spatial
heterogeneity, land use and conservation in the cerrado region of Brazil.
Journal of Biogeography (2006) 33, 536–548.
SILVA, J. M. C. and OREN, D. C. 1997 Geographic variation and conservation of the
Moustached Woodcreeper (Xiphocolaptes falcirostris), an endemic and
113
threatened species of northeastern Brazil. Bird Conservation International 7:
263-274.
SILVA, J. M. C. da and BATES, J.,M. 2002. Biogeographic patterns and conservation
in the South American Cerrado: a tropical savanna hotspot. BioScience 52:
225-233.
SILVA, J. M. C., SOUZA, M. A., BIEBER, A. G. D., and CARLOS, C. J. 2003. Aves
da Caatinga: Status, uso do hábitat e sensitividade. In: Leal, I. R., Tabarelli, M.,
and Silva, J. M. C. (eds.). Ecologia e Conservação da Caatinga. Recife,
Editora Universitária. p.237-273
SILVA-DIAS, M. A. F., RUTLEDGE, S., KABAT, P., SILVA DIAS, P. L., NOBRE,
C., FISCH, G., DOLMAN, A. J., ZIPSER, E., GARSTANG, M., MANZI, A.,
FUENTES, J. D., ROCHA, H., MARENGO, J., PLANA-FATTORI, A., SÁ,
L. D. A.. ALVALÁ, R. C. S., ANDREAE, M. O., ARTAXO, P., GIELOW,
R., and GATTI, L. 2002. Clouds and rain processes in a biosphere atmosphere
interaction context in the Amazon Region. Journal of Geophysical Research
107(D20): 46.1-46.23.
SOUZA, M. A. 2004. Padrões de distribuição e a conservação das Aves
Passeriformes da Caatinga. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade Federal
do Pará e Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. 124p.
STRAMMA, L. and ENGLAND, M. 1999. On the water masses and mean circulation
of the South Atlantic Ocean. Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 104: 20863 – 20883.
TABARELLI, M. and VICENTE, A. 2002. Lacunas de conhecimento sobre as plantas
da Caatinga. Pp. 25-40 In: Sampaio, E. V. S. B., Giulietti, A. M., Virgírio, J.,
and Gamarra-Rojas, C. F. L. (orgs) Vegetação e flora da Caatinga.
Associação Plantas do Nordeste e Centro Nordestino de Informações sobre
Plantas, Recife.
TANSEY, K., GRÉGOIRE, J.M., STROPPIANA, D., SOUSA, A., SILVA, J.,
PEREIRA, J. M. C., BOSCHETTI, L., MAGGI, M., BRIVIO, P. A.,.
FRASER, R., FLASSE, S., ERSHOV, D., BINAGHI, E., GRAETZ, D., and
PEDUZZI, P. 2004. Vegetation burning in the year 2000: Global burned area
estimates from SPOT VEGETATION data. Journal of Geophysical Research
109, D14S03, doi:10.1029/2003JD003589.
THORNE-MILLER, B. 1999. The living ocean: understanding and protecting
marine biodiversity. 2ª Ed. Island Press. Washington D.C. 214pp.
TNC - The Nature Conservancy and World Wildlife Fund. 2006. Standards for
Ecoregional Assessments and Biodiversity Visions. January 26, 2006. The
Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
TOMAS, W.M., LIMA BORGES, P. A., ROCHA, H. J. F., SÁ FILHO, R.,
KUTCHENSKI JR, F., and UDRY, T. V. 2000. Potencial dos rios Aquidauana
e Miranda, no Pantanal de Mato Grosso do Sul, para a conservação da ariranha
114
(Pteronura brasiliensis). In: Anais do III Simpósio sobre Recursos Naturais
e Sócio-econômicos do Pantanal. pp. 1-12. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa
Agropecuária – Embrapa-Pantanal, Corumbá, Brasil.
TUBELIS, D. P. and TOMAS, W. M.. 2003. Bird species of the wetland, Brazil.
Ararajuba 11: 5-37.
TYLER, H. A., BROWN JUNIOR, K. S., and WILSON, K. H. (1994). Swallowtail
Butterflies of the Americas: A Study in Biological Dynamics, Ecological
Diversity, Biosystematics and Conservation. Gainesville Scientific Publishers,
1994. 376 p.
VANZOLINI, P. E. 1976. On the lizards of Cerrado - Caatinga contact: evolutionary
and zoogeographical implications (Sauria). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, São
Paulo 29: 111-119.
VANZOLINI, P. E. 1974. Ecological and geographical distribution of lizards in
Pernambuco, north-eastern Brasil (Sauria). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, São
Paulo 28: 61-90.
WILLIG, M. M. and MARES, M. A. 1989. Mammals from the Caatinga: an updated list
and summary of recent research. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 49(2): 361367.
WILSON, E. O. 1992. Diversidade da Vida. Companhia das Letras. 447 p.
115
11. Annexes
11.1. Decree No. 5092, of 21 May 2004
Presidency of the Republic
Office of the President
Sub-office for Legal Affairs
DECREE Nº 5092, OF 21 MAY 2004.
Defines rules for the identification of priority
areas for the conservation, sustainable use and
sharing of benefits from biodiversity, as part of
the duties of the Ministry of the Environment.
The VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC, as acting President of the Republic, fulfilling the
duties vested in him by article 84, item IV of the Constitution, and complying with the rulings of
Law no 6938, of 31 August 1981 and Decree no 4339, of 22 august 2002,
PROCLAIMS:
Art. 1st The priority areas for the conservation, sustainable use and sharing of benefits from
biodiversity will be instituted by a ministerial administrative ruling, as part of the duties of the
Ministry of the Environment.
Art. 2nd For the purpose of the rulings of article 1o, the assessment and identification of priority
areas and actions for the conservation, sustainable use and sharing of benefits from biodiversity
will be carried out considering the following groups of biomes:
I - Amazon;
II - Cerrado and Pantanal;
III - Caatinga;
IV – Atlantic Forest and Pampas; and
V – Coastal and Marine Zone.
Art. 3rd The administrative ruling mentioned in art. 1st of this Decree shall be based on the areas
identified by the “Project for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Brazilian Biological
Diversity – PROBIO” and will be identified in a map of priority areas for the conservation and
sustainable use of Brazilian biological diversity.
Art. 4th The areas to be instituted by the ministerial administrative ruling mentioned in art. 1st of
this Decree will be considered for the purposes of creation of protected areas under the National
Protected Areas System – SNUC, biodiversity research and inventory, use, recuperation of
degraded areas and overexploited or threatened species, and sharing of benefits derived from
the access to genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge.
Art. 5th The rulings of this Decree do not impose additional restriction to the legislation currently
in force.
Art. 6th This Decree enters into force on the date of its publication.
Brasília, 21 May 2004; 183rd of the Independence and 116th of the Republic.
JOSÉ ALENCAR GOMES DA SILVA
Marina Silva
This text does not substitute the text published in the Federal Official Gazette of 24 May 2004.
116
11.2. MMA Administrative Ruling no 126, of 27 May 2004
MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE RULING Nº 126, OF 27 MAY 2004
THE MINISTER OF THE ENVIRONMENT, executing her legal duties and complying with the
rulings of Decrees no 2519, of 16 March 1998 and no 5092, of 21 May 2004, decides:
Art. 1st The areas mentioned in § 2nd of this Administrative Ruling are hereby recognized as
priority areas for the conservation, sustainable use and sharing of benefits from Brazilian
biodiversity, from now on Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of
Benefits from Brazilian Biodiversity or Priority Areas for Biodiversity, for purposes of
development and implementation of public policies, programs, projects, and activities under the
responsibility of the Federal Government directed at the:
I - in situ conservation of biodiversity;
II - sustainable use of biodiversity components;
III - sharing of benefits derived from the access to genetic resources and associated traditional
knowledge;
IV - biodiversity research and inventories;
V - recuperation of degraded areas and overexploited or threatened species; and
VI - economic valuation of biodiversity.
§ 1st The list of Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits
from Brazilian Biodiversity mentioned in the chapeau of this article shall be periodically revised,
within a timeframe of less than ten years, taking into consideration the advance of knowledge
and changes in environmental conditions, by the National Biodiversity Commission – CONABIO,
which will submit to the Minister of the Environment, if applicable, a draft administrative ruling for
their revision.
§ 2nd The description of the areas ruled in the caput of this article is listed in the “Map of Priority
Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from Brazilian
Biodiversity”, published by the Ministry of the Environment in November 2003 and edited again
in May 2004, and will be made available in the electronic sites of the Ministry of the Environment
and of the Brazilian Institute for the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources – IBAMA,
as well as at the headquarters of the central IBAMA agency and of its decentralized units.
§ 3rd The non-inclusion of territorial spaces in the list of Priority Areas for Biodiversity does not
imply absence or lack of importance of biodiversity.
Art. 2nd The actions identified in art. 1st of this Administrative Ruling will be implemented by the
agencies and entities responsible for developing and implementing policies and programs
related to biodiversity, considering the following priority classes:
I – extremely high;
II – very high; and
III – high.
Sole Paragraph. The agencies and entities mentioned in this article shall carry out the
complementary studies to classify the areas listed as insufficiently known in the categories
defined in items I, II, and III of this article or to propose their exclusion to the National
Biodiversity Commission - CONABIO.
Art. 3rd The rulings of this Administrative Ruling do not impose additional restriction to the
legislation currently in force.
Art. 4th This Administrative Ruling enters into force on the date of its publication.
MARINA SILVA
117
11.3. CONABIO Decision nº 39, of 14 December 2005
MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT
SECRETARIAT OF BIODIVERSITY AND FORESTS
DIRECTORATE OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY COMMISSION – CONABIO
SCEN Trecho 2 – Edifício Sede do IBAMA – Bloco H – 70818–900 – Brasília/DF
Phone: (61) 4009-9567, Fax: (61)4009-9587, e–mail: [email protected],
http://www.mma.gov.br/conabio
CONABIO Decision no 39, of 14 December 2005
Rules on the approval of the
methodology for revising the
Priority
Areas
for
the
Conservation, Sustainable Use
and Sharing of Benefits from
Brazilian Biodiversity.
The National Biodiversity Commission – CONABIO, carrying out its legal duties vested
by Decree no 4703, of 21 May 2003, and according to the proposal approved by the Plenary
during the 16th CONABIO Ordinary Meeting, and
Considering the Decree no 5092, of 21 May 2004, which defines the rules for identifying
the priority areas for the conservation, sustainable use and sharing of benefits from biodiversity,
as part of the duties of the Ministry of the Environment, and Administrative Ruling no 126, of 27
May 2004, which institutes the Priority Areas for Biodiversity;
Decides:
Art. 1st To approve the methodology for revising the Priority Areas for the Conservation,
Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from Brazilian Biodiversity, according to the document
annexed to this Decision.
Art.2nd This Decision enters into force on the date of its publication.
JOÃO PAULO RIBEIRO CAPOBIANCO
Secretary for Biodiversity and Forests
President of CONABIO
118
ANNEX to CONABIO Decision no 39, of 14 December 2005
METHODOLOGY FOR UPDATING THE PRIORITY AREAS FOR THE CONSERVATION,
SUSTAINABLE USE AND SHARING OF BENEFITS FROM BRAZILIAN BIODIVERSITY
1 Introduction
The Convention on Biological Diversity – CBD, signed in 1992, represents a global effort to
generate directives for maintaining biodiversity and has the challenge to harmonize
development with the conservation and sustainable use of natural resources.
Brazil, as Party to the CBD, must support actions to provide the government and society with
the information necessary for establishing priorities leading to the conservation, sustainable use
and sharing of benefits from Brazilian biological diversity.
One of the greatest challenges for decision-makers is the definition of action plans and
financing for biodiversity conservation, due to the lack of information about the urgency of each
initiative. Therefore, the establishment of regional priorities is essential to translate political
decisions into concrete actions, with efficient use of the available financial resources.
To achieve this objective, the Program for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Brazilian
Biological Diversity (PROBIO) carried out, from 1997 to 2000, a broad consultation process to
define the priority areas for conservation in the Amazon, Caatinga, Cerrado and Pantanal,
Atlantic Forest and Pampas, and Coastal and Marine Zone.
The supporting information, discussion methodology, and criteria for defining priority areas
varied slightly among the assessments carried out for each biome. In general, the available
information and the personal knowledge and experience of participating researchers on
biodiversity and human pressure in each biome were used for identifying the most relevant
areas. The degree of priority of each area was defined according to its biological richness,
importance to traditional communities and indigenous peoples, and vulnerability.
At the end of the updating process, 900 priority areas for biodiversity were chosen and
recognized by Decree No. 5092, of 21 May 2004, and instituted by the Ministry of the
Environment’s Administrative Ruling no 126, of 27 May 2004. This Administrative Ruling
determines that this list of priority areas “shall be periodically updated, within a timeframe of less
than ten years, taking into consideration the advances of knowledge and changes in
environmental conditions, by the National Biodiversity Commission – CONABIO”.
Since the original processes that defined these areas were carried out, new biological
information from inventories and expeditions became available. The new information has altered
the perception of how biodiversity is distributed in various biomes.
In addition, the Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP) and priority-setting tools are constantly
evolving, notably the procedures involving geoprocessing and mathematical modeling, which
can assist significantly in this updating process. However, it should be noted that these
technological tools support the decision-making process reducing its subjectivity, but should not
replace the participatory process and negotiation in the selection of priorities and actions. The
participatory aspect must be maintained, including public hearings and incorporation of the
interests and information provided by the various sectors into the definition of priority areas,
making them legitimate, which is an essential characteristic.
Thus, the Ministry of the Environment is promoting the update of the previously defined priority
areas, given the new available information and tools. This document is a proposal for a unified
methodology for revising the Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing
of Benefits from Brazilian Biodiversity, for CONABIO’s analysis. The Workshop “Update of the
Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from Biodiversity –
Targets and Tools”, with 121 participants, was carried out to define this methodology from
November 16 to 18, 2005, in Brasília – DF.
119
The Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP) approach was developed to assist in the
decision-making processes of public and private agents interested in the in situ conservation of
biodiversity.
Objectives
1.1 General Objective
To update the “Map of Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of
Benefits from Brazilian Biodiversity” for each of the Brazilian biomes, considering the most
updated information and the advance of priority-setting methodologies, improving the
participatory process of negotiations and consensus-building.
1.2 Specific Objectives
1. Establish information systems and databases to allow the periodic updating process of the
“Map of Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from
Brazilian Biodiversity”.
2. Revise and expand the regional databases generated in the process to select the “Priority
Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from Brazilian
Biodiversity”, to update information on biodiversity distribution patterns, ecological processes,
land use, and socio-economic trends.
3. Define the conservation targets in each biome, their conservation goals, knowledge, and
sustainable use.
4. Identify the processes causing habitat degradation and biodiversity reduction.
5. Identify the economic trends, governmental policies, and their respective influences on
biological diversity.
6. Identify and evaluate the advances and opportunities for conservation, sustainable use and
sharing of benefits from biodiversity in the country, emphasizing the expansion and
consolidation of the national protected areas system, to inform the priority-setting process for
actions directed at the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.
7. Re-design, re-classify or add new areas to those selected as priority areas in the previous
evaluation processes, in a participatory process, and adopting the recommendations of the
COP7-CBD Protected Areas Programme of Work, particularly regarding the use of the
systematic conservation planning tool.
8. Identify priority areas or regions for developing specific studies with the purpose of increasing
scientific knowledge and improving the characterization of biodiversity.
9. Define participatory recommendations for priority actions on the conservation, knowledge
increase, sustainable use, and benefit-sharing from biodiversity.
10. Disseminate the results of the updating process.
Geographical scope
The Brazilian territory will be divided into five large regions, corresponding approximately to the
Brazilian biomes as follows, for updating the priority areas for biodiversity:
a) Amazon: according to the limits adopted by the workshop on the Assessment and
Identification of Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits
from Biodiversity of the Brazilian Amazon, held in Macapá – AP in 1999.
b) Cerrado and Pantanal: according to the limits adopted by the workshop on Priority Actions for
the Conservation of Biodiversity in the Cerrado and Pantanal, held in Brasília – DF in 1998.
120
c) Caatinga: according to the limits adopted by the workshop on the Assessment and Priority
Actions for the Conservation of Biodiversity in the Caatinga Biome, held in Petrolina – BA in
2000.
d) Atlantic Forest and Pampas: according to the limits adopted by the workshop on the
Assessment and Priority Actions for the Conservation of the Atlantic Forest and Pampas
Biomes, held in Atibaia – SP in 1999.
e) Coastal and Marine Zone: according to the limits adopted by the workshop on the
Assessment and Priority Actions for the Coastal and Marine Zone, held in Porto Seguro – BA in
1999.
The limits of the Brazilian Biomes Map (IBGE 2004) will be used to organize the groups of
priority areas defined at the end of the updating process.
2 Steps of the process
The process to update the priority areas and actions for the conservation, sustainable use and
sharing of benefits from biodiversity in each biome will include several steps:
2.1 Regionalization
Within each biome, SBF/MMA shall establish a regionalized planning for the consultations and
negotiation processes, considering the characteristics of each biome and of the sectors to be
heard.
2.2 Dissemination of the updating process
This step should include the dissemination to the general public of information on the progress
of the process to update the priority areas, and about its steps and methodology.
2.3 Definition of conservation targets
The second step of the process will detail the conservation targets, their respective conservation
goals and relative importance. The conservation targets should be measurable and possible to
map. The following target categories may be considered in the definition of areas of biological
importance:
1. Biodiversity Targets: endemic species, species of limited distribution or threatened species;
habitats; phytophysiognomies; exceptional or rare biological phenomena; and biodiversity
substitutes (environmental units that indicate biological diversity, for example: geomorphological
and oceanographic phenomena, watersheds, interfluve areas, among others).
2. Sustainable Use Targets: species of economic, medicinal or phytotherapic importance; areas
of scenic beauty; areas/species that are important to traditional communities and for maintaining
their knowledge; flagspecies that motivate conservation and sustainable use actions; key
species on which the sustainable use of biodiversity components depends; important areas for
conservation-based development; areas providing environmental services to agricultural areas
(such as pollinator-dependent crops, and biological control); areas that are important for the
cultural and social diversity associated to biodiversity.
3. Resilience and Processes Targets: areas that are important for maintaining environmental
services (climate maintenance, biogeochemical cycles, hydrological cycles, aquifer recharge
areas); endemism centers and evolution processes; areas that are important for the aggregation
of species and for migratory species; pollinator species; climatic refuges; connectivity and
genetic flow; areas protecting water reserves; areas that are important for maintaining the flood
regime of wetlands; extensive areas for species requiring large habitat areas.
To define these conservation targets, consultations and negotiations will be carried out with
representatives of the government, academia, environmental institutions, and organizations
representing traditional, quilombola and indigenous communities. These consultations will also
define the types of costs and benefits that will be considered in the next steps of the process.
121
2.4 Review and expansion of the databases
After the conservation targets and goals are defined, databases containing information on the
geographical occurrence of the selected targets shall be gathered or compiled. The acquisition
of this data set is necessary and aims to revise and expand the regional georeferenced
databases generated during the process to select the “Priority Areas for the Conservation,
Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from Brazilian Biodiversity”. Eventually, the list of
conservation targets and goals can be modified according to the availability of relevant data.
The objective of this step is to inventory the biological, physical, and socio-economical
information that may be used for defining the important areas for biodiversity and for the
conservation of natural resources, and their relevance to achieve the established goals.
2.5 Definition of conservation goals and relative importance of each conservation target
For each conservation target, the following should be defined: (a) its relative importance in the
definition of the relevance of the areas for biodiversity; and (b) the conservation goals that must
be achieved by actions to be proposed in the subsequent steps of the process. The goals must
be quantifiable and objective, considering the already established policies and commitments
(e.g. Convention on Biological Diversity goals).
To define these conservation goals and the relative importance of the conservation targets,
consultations and negotiations will be carried out with representatives of the government,
academia, environmental institutions, and organizations representing traditional, quilombola and
indigenous communities.
2.6 Preparation of a Map of the Relevant Areas for Biodiversity
The relevant areas for biodiversity will be delimited considering the decisions of COP7-CBD,
and the systematic conservation planning principles and its basic criteria: habitat
representativeness, resilience, and vulnerability. Tools to support decision-making will be used
to generate irreplaceability maps, which will represent the degree of biological importance of
each area for achieving the goals established for each selected conservation target.
This step will involve public consultations and negotiations with representatives of the
government, academia, environmental institutions, and organizations representing traditional,
quilombola and indigenous communities.
2.7 Analysis of the Costs, Benefits, and Opportunities
A cost-benefit analysis will be made, articulating variables that have positive or negative
influence on conservation, to define the degree of difficulty each region will face to protect the
conservation targets.
In parallel, an analysis of interests will be made, identifying potential institutional and political
conflicts that may result from the influence of the definition of priority areas over social,
economic, political, and institutional interests in the region.
The opportunities will also be considered, such as the availability of public lands for the creation
of protected areas or for sustainable forest management. These data will be used in the
subsequent steps of the process.
This step will involve public consultations and negotiations with representatives of the
government, academia, environmental institutions, and organizations representing traditional,
quilombola and indigenous communities.
2.8 Analysis of the Degree of Threat and Human Pressure on the Relevant Areas for
Biodiversity
The degree of threat and the human pressure on the relevant areas will be assessed,
considering the following factors:
- Degree or intensity of calculated, observed, or inferred environmental alteration within a recent
period of time (at least in the last five years).
122
- Degree of consolidation of the existing infrastructure (roads, urban areas, energy transmission
lines, railroads, or agriculture and pasture areas).
- Degree of fragmentation and remaining vegetation cover of the native ecosystems.
- Predicted impacts of development axes.
- Any combination of two or more of the variables above.
2.9 Definition of the Priority Areas for Biodiversity
The identification of the priority areas for implementation of the recommended actions will be
based on the prior step’s identification of the relevant areas for biodiversity and natural
resources, on the analysis of costs, benefits and opportunities, and on the analysis of threats
and human pressure.
This step will involve public consultations and negotiations with representatives of the
government, academia, environmental institutions, and organizations representing traditional,
quilombola and indigenous communities.
2.10 Identification of Actions for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of
Benefits from Biodiversity in the regions relevant for biodiversity
After the conservation priorities are identified in the areas relevant for biodiversity, public
consultations will be carried out with the participation of representatives of the government,
academia, environmental institutions, and organizations representing traditional, quilombola and
indigenous communities, to define priority conservation actions. Participants of these
consultations will work in thematic groups organized to define specific actions indicated to each
priority area.
Actions for the conservation, sustainable use and sharing of benefits from biodiversity may
include:
1. Conservation actions: creation of protected areas, expansion of existing protected areas,
incentives for the establishment of mosaics of protected areas, enforcement and control, among
others.
2. Management actions: implementation and consolidation of existing protected areas,
recuperation of degraded areas, establishment of ecological corridors, sustainable management
of natural resources, management of pest or invasive species, conflict resolution on the
management of protected areas, enforcement and control, among others.
3. Research actions: biological inventories, biodiversity monitoring, studies on specific
population dynamics, long-term research, among others.
4. Institutional actions: ratification of indigenous lands, recognition of quilombo lands,
implementation of watershed committees, ecological-economic zoning, implementation of
environmental education programs, implementation of economic mechanisms to support
biodiversity conservation, among others.
5. Other necessary actions: for each action, the time frame, responsibilities, potential executing
agencies, and other necessary details must be indicated.
2.11 Compilation of Each Biome’s Results and Analysis by CONABIO
The results of the regional workshops on each biome should be compiled into a single report, to
be submitted to CONABIO.
2.12 National Workshop to Harmonize the Results for Each Biome
The results of the previous steps will be analyzed in a national workshop, to harmonize the
recommendations resulting from each regional workshop and by biome, considering the overlap
of areas and the different recommended actions. The results of this national workshop will be
submitted to CONABIO.
3 Public Hearings and Negotiations
123
Public hearings and negotiations must occur by region, according to the regions defined by
SBF/MMA. Three rounds of hearings and negotiations are planned, according to the table
below:
Hearings and negotiations step
Step of the process
Mini-workshop by biome
- Definition of the conservation targets
Broad regional workshops by biome
- Definition of conservation goals and relative
importance of each conservation target.
- Preparation of a Map of the Relevant Areas for
Biodiversity.
- Analysis of the Costs, Benefits, and Opportunities.
- Analysis of the Degree of Threat and Human
Pressure on the Relevant Areas for Biodiversity.
- Definition of the Priority Areas for Biodiversity.
- Identification of Actions for the Conservation,
Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from
Biodiversity in the regions relevant for biodiversity.
National Biodiversity Commission – CONABIO – 1st Ratification of the new map of priority areas for each
Approval
biome.
National workshop
Harmonization of the results for each biome.
National Biodiversity Commission – CONABIO – Ratification of the new map of priority areas for Brazil
Adjustments
3.1 Mini-Workshop by Biome
In each biome, representatives of the government, academia, environmental institutions, and
organizations representing traditional, quilombola and indigenous communities will be invited to
a mini-workshop. The organization of this mini-workshop should consider the different
languages, assumptions, and participation style of representatives of the various sectors, and
should favor dialogue through sectoral and inter-sectoral discussions for negotiating and
sharing the results.
3.2 Broad regional workshops by biome
In each biome, representatives of the government, academia, environmental institutions, and
organizations representing traditional, quilombola and indigenous communities will be invited to
regional workshops. The organization of these workshops should consider the different
languages, assumptions, and participation style of the representatives of the various sectors,
and should favor dialogue through sectoral and inter-sectoral discussions for negotiating and
sharing the results.
Previously harmonized reports, diagnoses, maps, and databases will be available to
participants, containing the following information:
- Characterization, quantification, and critical evaluation of the available information on
biodiversity and its use.
- Geographical occurrence of the conservation targets.
- Conservation costs and benefits.
- Threats and human pressure.
- Socio-economic trends, public policies, and human pressure.
- Important areas for conservation and their degree of relevance to the achievement of the
established goals.
Participants in the public hearings will work in thematic groups organized to carry out the
following activities:
124
- Analysis of the Costs, Benefits, and Opportunities.
- Analysis of the Degree of Threat and Human Pressure on the Relevant Areas for Biodiversity.
- Definition of the Priority Areas for Biodiversity, according to the classification categories listed
above.
- Identification of Actions for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from
Biodiversity in the relevant regions for biodiversity.
3.3 National Biodiversity Commission – CONABIO – 1st Approval
The results for each biome will be submitted to CONABIO for its approval, and may result or not
in the immediate update of the priority areas.
3.4 National Workshop
The results for each biome will be harmonized in a national workshop, with the participation of
representatives of the updating process for each biome.
3.5 National Biodiversity Commission – CONABIO – Adjustments
The results of the National Workshop will be submitted to CONABIO for approval, for the
immediate update of the priority areas.
4 Dissemination of Results
After consolidation of the maps by biome of the “Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable
Use and Sharing of Benefits from Brazilian Biodiversity”, these maps, together with the reports
containing recommended actions, and the databases, should be published in print and
electronically (interactive format).
Supervision
Every step of the process to update priority areas in each biome will be supervised by the
Directorate of Biodiversity Conservation (DCBio/SBF/MMA) and by CONABIO through periodic
reports prepared by the staff responsible for each biome.
To promote integration among the revision processes, a Coordinating Commission for the
Process to Update the Priority Areas for Biodiversity will be created and coordinated by
DCBio/SBF/MMA, with representatives from each responsible team. This commission will be
responsible for making decisions on issues arising from the process, and for allowing
information exchange, in addition to assisting CONABIO in the supervision of the review
process.
125
11.4. CONABIO Decision n°46, of 20 December 2006
MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT
SECRETARIAT OF BIODIVERSITY AND FORESTS
DIRECTORATE OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY COMMISSION - CONABIO
SCEN Trecho 2 – Edifício Sede do IBAMA – Bloco H – 70818-900 – Brasília/DF
Phone: (61) 4009-9567, Fax: (61) 4009-9594, e-mail: [email protected],
http://www.mma.gov.br/conabio
CONABIO Decision no 46, of 20 December 2006.
Approves the draft text of the
Administrative Ruling on the Update
of Priority Areas for the Conservation,
Sustainable Use and Sharing of
Benefits from Brazilian Biodiversity.
The National Biodiversity Commission – CONABIO, executing its legal duties vested by
Decree no 4703, of 21 May 2003, and in accordance with the proposal approved by the Plenary
during the 12th CONABIO Extraordinary Meeting, and according to the methodology approved
by its Decision no 39, of 14 December 2005, decides:
Art. 1st To approve the draft text of the Administrative Ruling on the Update of the
Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from Brazilian
Biodiversity (Annex).
JOÃO PAULO RIBEIRO CAPOBIANCO
Secretary of Biodiversity and Forests
President of CONABIO
126
11.5. MMA Administrative Ruling nº 9, of 23 January 2007
MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE RULING nº 9, OF 23 JANUARY 2007
The MINISTER OF THE ENVIRONMENT, executing her legal duties and complying
with the rulings of Decrees no 2519, of 16 March 1998 and no 5092, of 21 May 2004, decides:
Art. 1st The areas mentioned in § 2nd of this Administrative Ruling are hereby recognized
as priority areas for the conservation, sustainable use and sharing of benefits from biodiversity,
from now on Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from
Brazilian Biodiversity, for purposes of development and implementation of public policies,
programs, projects, and activities under the responsibility of the Federal Government directed at
the:
I - in situ conservation of biodiversity;
II - sustainable use of biodiversity components;
III - sharing of benefits derived from the access to genetic resources and the associated
traditional knowledge;
IV - biodiversity research and inventories;
V - recuperation of degraded areas and overexploited or threatened species; and
VI - economic valuation of biodiversity.
§ 1st The list of Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of
Benefits from Brazilian Biodiversity mentioned in the chapeau of this article shall be periodically
revised, within a timeframe of less than five years, taking into consideration the advance of
knowledge and changes in environmental conditions, by the National Biodiversity Commission –
CONABIO, with the Ministry of the Environment being responsible for issuing the administrative
ruling on the revision.
§ 2nd The description of the areas mentioned in the chapeau of this article is detailed in
the electronic site of the “Brazilian Biodiversity Portal – PortalBio” of the Ministry of the
Environment – MMA (http://www.mma.gov.br/portalbio) and in the Portal of the Brazilian
Institute
for
the
Environment
and
Renewable
Natural
Resources
–
IBAMA
(http://www.ibama.gov.br).
§ 3rd Territorial spaces not included in the list of Priority Areas for Biodiversity do not
necessarily lack biological importance.
Art. 2nd The actions identified in art. 1st of this Administrative Ruling will be implemented
taking into consideration the following biological importance classes and priorities for action:
I - Biological Importance Classes:
a - extremely high;
127
b - very high;
c – high; and
d – insufficiently known.
II – Priority for Action Classes:
a - extremely high;
b - very high; and
c – high
§ 1st The delimitation and priority degree of these areas do not restrict access to public
policies directed at indigenous peoples and local communities that are beneficiaries of the II
National Plan of Agrarian Reform or of the National Program for Strengthening Family
Agriculture under the rulings of article 189 of the Federal Constitution and of Law no 11326, of
24 July 2006.
Art. 3rd MMA is responsible for the creation and management of a Virtual Integrated
Database on Brazilian Biodiversity, incorporating the databases used in the process to update
the priority areas, and through continuous input of the biological importance map and inclusion
of new information on biodiversity.
Art. 4th The rulings of this Administrative Ruling do not impose additional restriction to
the legislation currently in force.
Art. 5th This Administrative Ruling enters into force on the date of its publication.
Art. 6th MMA Administrative Ruling no 126, of 27 May 2004, published in the Federal
Official Gazette of 29 May 2004, Section 1, page 142, is hereby revoked.
MARINA SILVA
128
11.6. Guidance for Regional Workshops
Manual for the Regional Meetings of the process to update the
Priority Areas and Actions for the Conservation, Sustainable Use
and Sharing of Benefits from Biodiversity
1. Background
The Convention on Biological Diversity – CBD, signed in 1992, addresses important
aspects related to the biodiversity theme, such as: conservation and sustainable use,
identification and monitoring, ex situ and in situ conservation, research and training, public
education and awareness, minimizing negative impacts, access to genetic resources, access to
technology and technology transfer, information exchange, technical and scientific cooperation,
biotechnology management, and sharing of biodiversity benefits, among others.
CBD’s challenge is to harmonize development with the conservation and sustainable
use of biological diversity. This task will not be successful, however, without the technological
and financial support from the economically developed countries. Research cannot be carried
out without the genetic resources of the poor and/or developing countries, which are generally
biodiversity rich.
CBD addresses these asymmetries and proposes guidelines to overcome them,
recognizing the principle of sharing the costs derived from the use of biodiversity and the
benefits arising from the commercialization of products resulting from the interchange between
rich and poor countries.
Brazil, as Party to the CBD, must support actions that provide the government and
society with the information necessary for establishing priorities that lead to the conservation,
sustainable use and sharing of benefits from Brazilian biological diversity.
To comply with CBD directives and commitments, the country must develop its National
Biological Diversity Policy, and implement the National Biological Diversity Program –
PRONABIO, enabling actions proposed by the National Policy.
The Project for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Brazilian Biological Diversity –
PROBIO, which is the executive component of PRONABIO, has the main objective of
supporting initiatives that provide information and basic contribution to the preparation of the
Policy and of the National Program.
The assessment and identification of priority areas and actions for the conservation of
Brazilian biomes was a pioneer and instigating initiative, given the great representativeness and
importance of Brazilian biodiversity for the sustainable development of Brazil.
With the development of the Project for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of
Brazilian Biological Diversity (PROBIO), it was possible for the first time to identify the priority
areas for biodiversity conservation, assess the socio-economic conditions and current trends in
human occupancy of the Brazilian territory, as well as to design the most important actions for
conserving our natural resources.
Between 1997 and 2000, PROBIO carried out broad consultations for defining the
priority areas for conservation in the Amazon, Caatinga, Cerrado and Pantanal, Atlantic Forest
and Pampas, and Coastal and Marine Zone.
The resource information, discussion methodology, and criteria for defining priority
areas varied slightly among the assessments for each biome. In general, the definition of the
most relevant areas was based on the available information on biodiversity and human
pressure, and on the experience of researchers participating in the workshops for each biome.
The priority degree of each area was defined according to its biological richness, importance to
traditional and indigenous communities, and its vulnerability.
At the end of the updating process, 900 areas were selected, which were officially
recognized through Decree no 5092, of 21 May 2004, and instituted by the Ministry of the
129
Environment’s Administrative Ruling no 126, of 27 May 2004. This Administrative Ruling
determines that this list “shall be periodically revised, within a framework of less than ten years,
taking into consideration the advancement of knowledge and changes in environmental
conditions, by the National Biodiversity Commission – CONABIO”.
Since the original processes that defined these areas were carried out, new biological
information resulting from inventories and expeditions became available, altering perception on
how biodiversity is distributed in various biomes.
Currently, the update of the Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and
Sharing of Benefits from Biodiversity is a priority for MMA, given the availability of new
information and tools. This action is also in agreement with the strategies suggested by the
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), by the National Action Plan for Implementing the
National Biodiversity Policy (PAN-Bio), approved by the 9th Extraordinary Meeting (CONABIO
Decision no 40, of 7 February 2006), and by the National Protected Areas Plan (PNAP),
instituted by Decree no 5758, of 13 April 2006.
The proposed methodology for revising the Priority Areas for the Conservation,
Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from Brazilian Biodiversity was discussed in the
Workshop “Update of the Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of
Benefits from Biodiversity – Targets and Tools”, held from November 16 to 18, 2005, in Brasília
– DF, and later approved by CONABIO in its 16th Ordinary Meeting (CONABIO Decision no 39,
of 14 December 2006).
This methodology incorporates the principles of the Systematic Conservation Planning
tool and its basic criteria (habitat representativeness, resilience, and vulnerability), and values
the participatory negotiation process and consensus building.
The MMA is responsible for making the necessary ways and means available for the
process to update the priority areas, to ensure society’s participation and the achievement of
expected result, which should reflect the decisions of the working groups formed in the regional
workshops, which should use as resource information the databases compiled during the
preparation process. The MMA believes that the process to update the priority areas should be
a participatory process, and expects the contribution of all invited sectors.
The process to update the Priority Areas and Actions is carried out simultaneously for all
Brazilian biomes. The first steps of the process (Technical Meetings) occurred from May to
September 2006, and defined the conservation targets, conservation goals, and relative
importance of each conservation target, in addition to preparing the Map of the Relevant Areas
for Biodiversity.
The people, institutions, and associations that contribute to this process have various
interests, needs, opinions, experiences, and degrees of involvement. Anticipating the possible
diversity of proposal formats to be prepared and submitted by contributors, the MMA created
this document to assist the consultation process, with the purpose to clarify and detail the
procedures of the consultation process; the sectors involved in the process; the types of
activities related to the suggested themes; and a series of examples to guide the preparation of
proposals and the update of the Priority Areas and Actions for the Conservation, Sustainable
Use, and Sharing of Benefits from Biodiversity.
2. Objective of the Regional Workshops
The regional workshops have the main objective of promoting the revision/update of the
Priority Areas and Actions for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from
Biodiversity through a participatory consultation process involving representatives of various
sectors.
3. Participants Invited to the Regional Workshops
Various society sectors will be invited to participate in the regional workshops, to
promote a broad consultation process:
130
•
•
Representatives of the federal, state and municipal government;
Academia and research sector (many already participated in the
technical/scientific workshop*);
• Non-governmental organizations (NGOs);
• Representatives of indigenous peoples, quilombolas, traditional communities,
caiçaras, etc.;
• Production and development sector.
* A Technical/Scientific Workshop was carried out to identify the existing information on
biodiversity. Information was compiled according to the guidelines of the systematic
conservation planning tool, and will be used as resource information in the regional workshops.
4. Main Information Sources
The Ministry of the Environment will bring to the events a set of compiled information to
be used as resource information for developing the planned activities.
Among the compiled information, it is important to note:
•
Cartographic Database containing information on administrative borders,
hydrography, transportation system, municipalities.
• Natural Vegetation Remnants – interpretation of satellite images, currently
under preparation by PROBIO studies or compiled from information provided by
other institutions.
• Priority Areas (Current Map) - identified by the PROBIO sub-projects and
officially recognized through Decree no 5092, of 21 May 2004, and instituted by
the Ministry of the Environment’s Administrative Ruling no 126, of 27 May 2004.
• Protected Areas and Indigenous Lands – map of the federal and state protected
areas and map of indigenous lands.
• Biological Importance Map – generated through the analysis of conservation
targets and goals indicated by experts during the preparatory technical meeting.
• Preliminary proposal for the new priority areas – generated through the analysis
of the biological importance map.
In addition to the information compiled by MMA, participants may bring other information
to support the revision, identification, inclusion, characterization, priority-setting, and
development of actions proposed for the priority areas.
5. Main activities of the regional events
The MMA will bring to the regional workshops a preliminary version of the priority areas,
and the Biological Importance Map.
The working groups will be organized by region.
5.1. The first activity will be the revision of the limits of the priority areas
- Revise each priority area proposed by MMA, allowing the adjustment of limits based on
additional information such as:
• Polygons of the previous priority areas
• Polygons of priority areas identified by other studies
• Natural, legal, or administrative limits (sub-watersheds, protected areas, etc.)
- Revise priority areas identified by the previous process and which were not included among
the new proposed areas.
- Discuss the inclusion of new areas based on additional information brought by participants of
the working groups.
To optimize the process and make good use of the discussed information, the
characterization of the area (2nd activity) should be made during the discussion to adjust or
approve each area, since the working group will discuss the area’s importance to biodiversity.
- The Biological Importance Map that will be generated for each BIOME will be based on the
criteria of irreplaceability, representativeness, and vulnerability (inherent characteristic of the
target). This map will not consider external threats, risk (combination of vulnerability and threat),
131
or opportunities for sustainable use and benefit-sharing, since these will be considered during
the analysis of the priority of each area.
- The priority areas should be subdivided when actions can be differentiated (e.g.: area for
creation of full protection protected area / area for creation of corridor with recuperation actions,
etc.).
5.2. The second activity will be the Characterization of the Defined Areas
- Characterization
• Maintenance of Endemic Species
• Maintenance of Threatened Species
• Importance for the maintenance of environmental services (protection of
headwaters, aquifer recharge areas, soil protection, climate/microclimate
maintenance, etc.)
• Protection of scenic and landscape aspects (mountain ranges, mountains,
waterfalls, lakes, canyons, etc.)
• Protection of ecosystems / ecosystem services
• Protection of ecotones
• Maintenance of biodiversity corridors
- Opportunities for Biodiversity Conservation
1. Presence of RPPNs
2. Potential for Ecotourism
3. Types of use that are compatible with biodiversity preservation
4. Existence of local social demands for conservation
- Threats to Biodiversity
5. Agricultural expansion with no environmental control
6. Disorganized urban expansion
7. Expansion of tourism/recreational use with no environmental control
8. Infrastructure projects
9. Hunting and animal traffic threats
10. Deforestation
11. Exploitation of threatened species
12. Infrastructure works
5.3. The third activity will be Detailing the most adequate Actions for the Area:
- In situ conservation
13. creation of ecological corridors among protected areas;
14. creation of mechanisms to integrate the federal, state, and municipal protected
area systems;
15. creation, as a priority, of new protected areas contiguous or close to already
existing ones, to increase the effectively protected area;
16. creation and strengthening of in situ genetic reserves, especially for threatened
species;
17. land tenure regularization of the already established protected areas;
18. integration of the conservation of populations, species, genetic resources, and
sustainable use practices through projects on the integrated management of
natural resources;
19. control of the exchange and eradication of alien invasive species in ecosystems
and habitats;
20. recuperation and restoration of degraded ecosystems;
21. conservation of cultivated and extractive species in collaboration with local rural
producers and indigenous communities;
22. preservation and maintenance of the knowledge, innovations, and practices of
local communities and indigenous peoples with traditional life styles that are
relevant for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity;
23. training of technical staff on the management of protected areas;
- Biodiversity inventory and identification
24. taxonomic inventories of plant and animal species and micro-organisms;
25. assessment of the genetic diversity of plants, animals, and micro-organisms of
actual or potential value.
132
26. inventory of the wild species diversity related to cultivated or domesticated
species or species of potential value (for agriculture, medical purposes, as
protein source, cultural interest, and scientific research);
27. morphological and genetic characterization of biodiversity components;
28. inventory and documentation of the traditional knowledge associated to the use
of biological resources;
29. economic valuation of biodiversity components, and of their products and
services.
- Monitoring and evaluation, and impact mitigation
30. continuous monitoring of the diversity of threatened species;
31. evaluation of the environmental impact of development projects and actions,
particularly on biological diversity;
32. ecosystem restoration and rehabilitation;
33. recuperation of degraded areas with native species;
34. studies and research on the drivers of degradation and reduction of biodiversity
components;
35. creation or increase of incentives to recycling and reducing demand on
biological resources;
36. fire monitoring, prevention, and combat;
37. deforestation monitoring and combat;
38. studies and inventories on socio-economic dynamics and drivers of degradation
and reduction of biodiversity components.
- Ex situ conservation
39. enrichment of the genetic variability maintained in specific gene banks through
the collection, introduction, and exchange of genetic materials of actual or
potential value;
40. constitution of nuclear collections;
41. carrying out ethnobotanic inventories;
42. development of new markets for local varieties and non-traditional species.
- Sustainable use of biodiversity components
43. combat to the unsustainable use of biological resources in all types of human
communities;
44. support to local communities for developing and adopting corrective actions in
degraded areas in which biological diversity has been reduced;
45. protection and incentives to biological diversity use practices based on
traditional cultural practices compatible with conservation or sustainable use
requirements;
46. incentives to sustainable management and use projects proposed and
managed by local associations and communities;
47. cooperation between government and the private sector in the development of
methods for the sustainable use of biological resources.
- Distribution of benefits
48. creation or increase of financial incentives to individuals and communities
related to the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity;
49. anthropological and ethno-knowledge recording and inventories on the forms of
generating and controlling biodiversity knowledge developed by local
indigenous and non-indigenous traditional communities, as well as on their
management systems;
50. support to local, indigenous and non-indigenous communities for the process of
recognizing their traditional knowledge and practices for biodiversity
management;
51. guidance and incentives to the distribution of benefits derived from the
commercial use of biodiversity components;
52. valuation of biological diversity at the ecosystem, species, and gene level;
53. support to local populations for developing and implementing actions for the
recuperation of degraded areas where biological diversity has been reduced.
- Public education and awareness
54. Promotion and incentives to understanding the objectives of the Convention,
through environmental education and awareness programs directed at the
entire society;
133
55. sustainable environmental tourism;
56. programs to disseminate quality information on biological diversity to knowledge
multipliers inserted in key sectors.
- Legal matters
57. creation or increase of incentives to communities related to the conservation
and sustainable use of biological diversity, supported by legislation;
58. ratification of Indigenous Lands
59. recognition of quilombola lands
60. implementation of watershed committees
61. Ecological-Economic Zoning (ZEE)
62. identification of conflicts and assessment of legislation associated to production
sectors that affect biological diversity (e.g.: agriculture, silviculture, energy
production, fisheries, mining, tourism, among others);
63. development of sui generis systems for protecting traditional knowledge
associated to genetic resources.
YES or NO should be marked for each of the options presented below, to facilitate
researching the database:
- Creation/ expansion of protected areas:
64. Group Suggestion: Full Protection or Sustainable Use;
- Recuperation of Degraded Areas;
- Recuperation of populations of threatened species;
- Creation of Mosaics/ Corridors;
- Control of Invasive Species;
- Sustainable management of Natural Resources;
- Enforcement;
- Environmental Education;
- Anthropological Studies;
- Studies on the Physical Environment;
- Biological Inventory;
- Preparation/ Implementation of Management Plan for Protected Area.
5.4. The fourth activity will be to set the PRIORITY degree for each area
Importance for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Sharing of Benefits from
Brazilian Biodiversity. Color code:
Urgency for action. Shading pattern code:
134
The criteria for determining urgency for action will be defined according to the
characteristics of each biome, using one or more of the following:
65.
66.
67.
68.
biological importance
degree of stability
degree of threat
opportunities
6. Questions and Answers:
1. Areas not designated as Priority Areas are areas that lack biological importance?
A: No. All natural areas are important for the conservation of biodiversity and should be
preserved according to current legislation. The establishment of priorities has the purpose
of guiding public policies and investments in conservation.
2. Why is it necessary to revise the map of priority areas?
A: The Ministry of the Environment’s Administrative Ruling no 126, of 27 May 2004
determines that this list of priority areas “shall be periodically revised, within a timeframe
of less than ten years, considering the advances of knowledge and changes in
environmental conditions, by the National Biodiversity Commission – CONABIO”.
The Ministry of the Environment considers that the advance of knowledge on biodiversity
and the information databases currently available are ideal to begin the process to update
the map of priority areas. Part of the areas indicated as priority in the previous process were
already studied and/or were object of intervention actions.
3. Why altering the methodology applied in the previous priority-setting process?
A: The previous methodology deserves the credit of being the first large effort to set
priorities. The incorporation of the concepts of the Systematic Conservation Planning tool
and the better use of georeferenced information allow the adjustment of some deficiencies
of the previous process:
- the integration of information produced by the working groups resulted in the loss
of many significant pieces of information;
- the previous methodology did not incorporate the concept of complementarity,
which values areas containing species that are not yet protected under the current
protected areas system;
- subjectivity is a characteristic that will always be present in this type of activity but,
in the previous methodology, it was not explicit and could not be assessed or
replicated (repeated to obtain the same results);
- the information that supported the definition of the previous priority areas will not
be ignored, but rather refined and re-analyzed under a methodology that
incorporates principles capable of achieving a more efficient priority-setting effort;
- areas for which there was no inventory could not be assessed in the previous
process. When environmental characteristics are used (vegetation, geographical
units, etc.), it is possible to assess the complementary value, even of those areas
that are still under-studied.
4. How was the methodology defined for revising the priority areas?
135
A: To harmonize methodologies that could be used for all biomes, a broad discussion was
promoted involving technical staff from the Ministry of the Environment, IBAMA, NGOs, and
experts. The consensus indicated the use of the Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP)
methodology to update the Priority Areas and Actions for the Conservation, Sustainable
Use, and Sharing of Benefits from Biodiversity in all biomes.
The discussion about the methodology proposed for revising the Priority Areas occurred in
the Workshop “Update of the Priority Areas for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and
Sharing of Benefits from Biodiversity – Targets and Tools”, held from November 16 to 18,
2005, in Brasília – DF, and was later approved by CONABIO in its 16th Ordinary Meeting
(CONABIO Decision no 39, of 14 December 2006).
5. What are the Targets and Goals established under the current system?
A: The targets or “conservation targets” are used by the supporting technology to identify
areas of known greater biological importance. Each identified target is added to the
software through the spatial distribution of its potential occurrence. The conservation goal is
established as the minimum area needed to ensure the preservation of each target. The
goal can be established based on a minimum area required for supporting a number of
viable populations of the species. The mathematical calculation system uses the
conservation goal to identify the priority areas for conserving the chosen targets.
6. What are the types of Conservation Target?
A: According to the approved methodology, the targets can be divided into 3 groups:
Biodiversity Targets:
Endemic species, species of limited distribution or threatened species, habitats;
phytophysiognomies; exceptional or rare biological events; and indicators/biodiversity
substitutes (environmental units that indicate biological diversity, such as: geomorphological
and oceanographic phenomena, watersheds or interfluve areas, among others).
Sustainable Use Targets:
Species of economic, medicinal, or phytotherapic importance; areas of scenic beauty; areas
or species that are important for traditional communities and for maintaining their
knowledge; flagspecies that motivate conservation and sustainable use actions; key species
on which the sustainable use of biodiversity components depends; areas that are important
for conservation-based development; areas providing environmental services to agricultural
areas (such as pollinator-dependent crops and crops that depend on biological control);
areas important for the cultural and social diversity associated to biodiversity.
Resilience and Process Targets:
Areas important for the maintenance of environmental services (climate maintenance, biogeochemical cycles, hydrological processes, aquifer recharge areas); centers of endemism;
evolutionary processes; areas important for aggregation of species and for migratory
species; pollinator species; climatic refuges; connectivity and gene flow; areas protecting
headwaters; areas important for maintaining the flood regime of wetlands; extensive areas
for species requiring extensive habitat areas.
7. Aren’t the Goals subjective?
A: The goals are subjective and defined based on the existing knowledge on the minimum
area to ensure the preservation of each conservation target. Even being subjective, the goal
is documented and can be adjusted to create scenarios and analyses of the impact of its
adjustment over the final result. The subjectivity in the definition of goals can be reduced
based on existing knowledge about the characteristics and area needs of each target. Also,
by establishing goals and monitoring their long-term effect, the future revisions will become
increasingly objective.
8. What is the function of the mathematical modeling system used in the current
methodology?
A: The mathematical modeling system has a very limited function in the analysis. Its use
allows the calculation of the degree of biological importance of each area for the
achievement of the established goals and preservation of targets. The system only
automates the analysis of these targets and goals, incorporating the principles of
136
complementarity, irreplaceability, and efficiency to the definition of the degree of priority for
each area.
9. Is the result produced by the system reliable?
A: The reliability of the results produced by the system is closely linked to the quality of the
choice of targets and of the establishment of goals. The choice of targets in this process to
revise the priority areas is limited by the quality and availability of existing systematized
information on the BIOME. However, the targets selected as important for the biome, for
which there is no systematized information or information in spatial format, were
documented to indicate the need for future mapping efforts. For this reason, a technical
meeting was carried out to guide the selection of targets, goals, and of the best available
databases. With the results of this meeting, it was possible to prepare the biological
importance maps that will inform the regional workshops. These results should be used as
technical contribution to guide discussions, and should allow adjustments based on new
elements the participants may bring to the regional workshops.
10. Why using hexagons in the mathematical modeling systems?
A: The system needs a regional classification base for comparing the importance of each
area. The area to be analyzed can be subdivided into small squares or hexagons. The use
of hexagons offers better results when the border effect among areas is considered.
11. What is the composition of the participants of the regional workshops?
A: Given their consultative and participatory characteristics, the regional workshops will
have participants from various sectors, including:
- governmental sector (federal, state, and municipal);
- academia and research sector (many representatives already participated in the
technical meeting);
- non-governmental sector (NGOs);
- representatives of indigenous peoples, quilombola and traditional communities,
caiçaras, etc.;
- production and development sector.
12. Why include the development sector in the definition of priority areas for the
conservation, sustainable use and sharing of benefits from biodiversity?
A: The participation of the development sector is important for the indication of priority
areas, especially those related to the distribution of benefits from biodiversity, and for
contributing to the indication of actions for the conservation and sustainable use of
biodiversity in each area. The presence of the production sector is also important for this
sector to become familiar with the process and the adopted criteria and, whenever possible,
to share the process and criteria with other initiatives.
13. Is the biological importance map resulting from the modeling systems mandatory?
A: The biological importance map results from a modeling exercise carried out according to
the guidance and records of a technical meeting with various experts. Even following this
guidance, the quality of the product is related to the availability of information on the
BIOME. For this reason, the biological importance map should not be used as a mandatory
document, but rather as a contribution to the establishment of priority areas, and the areas
indicated by the system may be revised based on more detailed information detained by
participants of the regional working groups.
14. Is it necessary to discuss again the databases used to generate the biological
importance map?
A: The biological importance map was generated using databases indicated by experts that
participated in the technical meeting. As general guidance, the best databases containing
available information that was standardized and systematized for the BIOME were used. It
is not necessary to analyze and discuss the databases during the regional workshop. The
focus of the workshop is to discuss the resulting output and to correct possible
inconsistencies or omissions in the identification of priority areas. New information can be
provided by participants for future use in new simulations and updating processes, but the
regional workshops will not have time allocated to discuss this information.
137
15. Were the sustainable use targets included in the mathematical modeling system?
A: The sustainable use targets related to biodiversity, such as areas with greater density of
natural resources and areas where species of economic interest or potential occur, and that
could be mapped, were included in the mathematical modeling system to generate the
biological importance map, and will assist in the selection of areas. It is important to note
that, during the selection of priority areas, the system may have chosen to protect species
of economic use in areas far from the populations that use them sustainably, and it is
therefore necessary to revise the areas selected by the system considering additional
information. In some cases, it was not possible to obtain enough information to incorporate
sustainable use targets in the system (complementary information is available in Question
23).
16. Can neighboring areas selected by the system be grouped?
A: Yes. The working groups can redefine the limits of the areas, grouping neighboring areas
if the qualification, importance, and recommended actions are similar.
17. Can an area selected by the system be subdivided?
A: Yes. The working groups can, and are directed to, whenever possible, subdivide the
areas that have different qualifications, importance, or recommended actions.
The working groups can propose mosaics of protected areas or corridors.
18. Can the delimitation of the areas selected by the system be adjusted?
A: Yes. Based on more detailed information or existing knowledge within the working group,
consensus can be reached to alter the delimitation of selected areas. Any adjustment will
have to be justified and documented in the records of the process.
19. What type of information can the delimitation of the area be based on?
A: The delimitation of a specific area can be defined based on a set of criteria. The working
group should assess the most adequate criteria for each area:
- native vegetation remnants;
- watersheds;
- administrative borders;
- features of the physical or biotic environment.
20. Can an area selected by the system be excluded from the final list of areas?
A: It depends. The exclusion of areas should be decided only when some type of
inconsistency is identified in the information that led to the selection of the area by the
system, and if the working group reaches the conclusion that the area does not have the
indicated importance. In this case, a technical justification of this reason should be
presented. It is not possible to exclude an area without disqualifying its biological
importance. It is also not possible to exclude an area to negotiate with another area of “the
same” importance.
21. Can an area of high/very high/extremely high biological importance selected by the
system or by the working group be negotiated for another area if other use interests
exist that are not compatible with biodiversity conservation?
A: No. The result expected from the workshops is a map representing the areas of high/very
high/extremely high biological importance, together with their characterization and
suggestions for actions to be executed/promoted by the government for maintaining
Brazilian biodiversity. The existence of other use interests that are not compatible with the
conservation of an area’s biodiversity is not acceptable as justification for either the
inclusion or exclusion of an area. These interests should be considered in the
characterization of the area and in the identification of suggested actions.
22. Can a proposal be presented for a new area important for biodiversity conservation,
which was not selected by the system? What are the criteria for proposing a new area?
A: Yes. New areas can be proposed based on more detailed information or existing
knowledge within the working group. The majority of the working group should be convinced
about the importance of the new proposed area, and it should be qualified, detailing why it
138
is important for biodiversity conservation. Based on the information justifying the inclusion of
the area, the working group should qualify its biological importance within the following
categories: Extremely High, Very High or High. The criteria for establishing the area’s
importance for conservation, sustainable use, and benefit-sharing should be based on:
- protection of unique ecosystems;
- protection of threatened species;
- protection of endemic species or species of limited distribution.
23. Can a proposal be presented for the inclusion of a new area important for sustainable
use, which was not selected by the system? What are the criteria for proposing this new
area?
A: Yes. Areas that are important for sustainable use can be considered for delimiting new
priority areas.
The selected area should comply with the following criteria:
- encompasses natural areas;
- there is current sustainable use of biodiversity components.
The coincidence of the area with other biodiversity components should be considered for
establishing its importance for conservation, sustainable use, and benefit-sharing, according
to the following categories: Extremely High, Very High, or High.
24. How will the importance of the sustainable use areas incorporated by the working
groups in the regional workshops be established?
A: The area selected by the working group must have at least high biological importance,
characterized by the presence of natural vegetation remnants and presence of sustainably
exploited species.
The degree of biological importance can be elevated to “Very High” or “Extremely High” in
the following cases:
- when the biological importance map indicates one of these other classifications;
- when the area holds threatened, endemic, or rare species, the information on
which was not previously incorporated in the system.
25. Is the presence of a traditional community enough to select an area as priority?
A: No. The priority areas should not represent traditional, quilombola, indigenous, caiçara,
or other communities, but rather should represent their importance for maintaining
biodiversity. The existence of significant biodiversity resources that are being used
sustainably can be one of the criteria for selecting the area. The existence of social
requirements for maintaining the sustainable use(s) should be treated as an opportunity for
biodiversity conservation.
26. Is the presence of a threat to an area a justification to include this area as priority?
A: No. The area should be included based on its importance for conservation, sustainable
use, and sharing of benefits from biodiversity. The presence of some type of threat should
be used as criterion for defining its PRIORITY, not its IMPORTANCE.
27. Is there a minimum size for priority areas?
A: Yes. The minimum size will be defined for each BIOME. The map or priority areas does
not allow the input of information of exclusively local interest. It should be used for guiding
governmental actions, not for imposing actions on specific demands.
28. How should areas selected as priority by the previous priority-setting process but not
selected by the new system be dealt with?
A: These areas should be individually analyzed by the working group. Participants may
reach one of the following conclusions:
- the area was not included because it was already completely deprived of its
original characteristics (the creation of an area with recommendation for
recuperation actions or the exclusion of the area from the priority list can be
considered);
- the area was not included because there was insufficient information in the system
to characterize it as a priority area (the working group may decide to maintain the
139
previous area if participants believe it maintains the characteristics that previously
qualified it as a priority area);
- the area was not included because its spatial representation was incorrect, and
there is an area with better representation in the current proposal (the old area can
be excluded);
- the working group has no information on the area (the precaution principle should
be applied by maintaining the area with the recommendation for biological inventory
actions to confirm its actual importance).
In those cases where an area selected in the previous process is excluded, the reasons for
the exclusion should be described and documented in an appropriate form.
29. What should be done when there is not enough information to revise an old area or an
area selected by the system?
A: The working group should apply the precaution principle and maintain the area,
suggesting biological inventory actions to confirm its actual importance.
30. Do threatened areas or areas under greater pressure have greater importance?
A: No. Threat analyses or altering pressure analyses have no influence on the importance
of the area. These analyses are essential for defining priority for action.
31. Does an area with ecotourism potential have greater importance?
A: No. Ecotourism potential is a characteristic that can be used as opportunity for
conservation, but does not affect the importance of the area. Knowledge about this potential
is essential for qualifying the opportunities for biodiversity conservation and guiding
recommended actions for the area.
32. What are the criteria for establishing the priority for action of these areas?
A: The criteria are defined according to the characteristics of each biome, using one or
more of the following:
- biological importance;
- degree of stability;
- degree of threat;
- opportunities for sustainable use and benefit-sharing.
33. Why adopt a code for the area’s priority for action?
A: The use of a code for priority for action in the map has the purpose of allowing direct
apprehension of information, where the importance for biodiversity is represented by
different colors and the priority for action is represented by the shading pattern of the area.
34. Can the participants of the regional workshops bring additional information?
A: The MMA will bring a large quantity of systematized information to the workshop. The
participants that have additional information that can assist in the identification, delimitation,
or qualification of the priority areas should bring this information to the regional workshops.
35. What type of information can be brought to the regional workshops?
A: The participants can bring printed or digital (shapefile) information, with cartographic
projection data, to allow comparison with the existing maps.
36. In what step of the process will the existing protected areas be analyzed?
A: The existing protected areas will be analyzed in various steps of the process:
- for calculating the biological importance, the full protection protected areas will be
considered by the system as reserved areas. This means that the extension of
these protected areas will be accounted to achieve part of the goal of the already
protected targets;
- for establishing priority areas, the existing protected areas will be considered for
defining limits, qualification, recommendation of actions, and priority-setting.
37. Are there risks to proposing the creation of protected areas suggesting the full
protection category with no certainty of the presence of indigenous, traditional,
quilombola, caiçara or other communities in the area?
140
A: The suggestion of the protection category serves as guidance for governmental actions.
Before any intervention in the area, detailed studies will be carried out in accordance with
SNUC, which should confirm:
- the most appropriate category;
- the biological characterization of the area;
- the environmental viability of implementing the protected area;
- the existence of economic uses compatible with biodiversity preservation;
- the area’s socio-economic and land tenure profile;
- the relevant scenic aspects.
38. Is it possible to propose the creation of full protection protected areas in places
reportedly used by indigenous, traditional, quilombola, caiçara, or other communities?
A: Conflicts should be avoided in the map, since the indication of the type of protected area
is a suggestion that will be evaluated based on more detailed information before any
intervention. The indication of sustainable use to an area should guide the suggestion to
create sustainable use protected areas or implement projects for the management of areas
and/or native species.
39. Is it possible to propose the creation of full protection protected areas in areas that were
significantly altered by intensive economic use?
A: This type of conflict can be avoided by improving the definition of the limits of the area to
avoid the incorporation of much altered areas, where biodiversity has been deprived of its
original characteristics. (The responses to questions 37 and 38 are also relevant to this
question).
40. How should the existing full protection protected areas be dealt with?
A: All federal and state full protection protected areas are areas of “Extremely High”
biological importance and should remain separate from adjacent or nearby areas, to allow
specific detailing of actions.
41. How should the existing sustainable use protected areas be dealt with?
A: The sustainable use protected areas (excluding APAs, which will be object of specific
detailed treatment) should be treated as individual areas, and their biological importance
should be calculated through the analysis of the biological importance map. They will be, at
least, areas of “High” importance.
42. How should the existing APAs be dealt with?
A: The APAs are analyzed as areas available for contributing to the achievement of goals,
and can qualify as priority areas or not, depending on their biological importance value. The
priority areas that include an APA, partially or completely, should be subdivided into the
portion outside the APA and the portion inside the APA. The portion inside the APA will
receive a different code to allow more detailed qualification and description of actions.
43. How should the existing indigenous lands be dealt with?
A: If the indigenous land overlaps with a priority area, it should be completely included in a
new priority area to allow more specific detailing of conservation actions. The importance of
this area created to represent the indigenous land should be calculated based on the
biological importance map or copied from the adjacent priority action.
44. How should the recommendations for areas located in other BIOME according to the
IBGE map be dealt with?
A: Each working group should be responsible for the geographical area delimited by the
IBGE BIOMES map, including all enclaves of other vegetation formations present within
that geographical area. This means that the regional workshops should include participants
that are knowledgeable on the area to be analyzed, including all vegetation formations that
influence the distribution of biodiversity. For example:
- the Caatinga workshop should include participants capable of defining the
importance of the Atlantic Forest enclaves present within its geographical area;
- the Amazon workshop should include participants capable of defining the
importance of the Cerrado enclaves present within its geographical area;
141
- the Atlantic Forest workshop should include participants capable of defining the
importance of the natural grasslands present within its geographical area.
This procedure has the purpose of ensuring that the entire Brazilian territory is analyzed,
avoiding gaps and minimizing overlap of areas and recommendations.
The recommendations received from meetings on other BIOMES will be presented to the
regional events by MMA for analysis and incorporation by the regional working groups
during the event.
45. How will the results for the various Biomes be integrated to produce a map of priority
areas for Brazil?
A: The results obtained for the various Biomes will be integrated by MMA. Eventual conflicts
will be documented to be presented at the national workshop.
46. How will the authorship of researchers and/or research institutions providing databases
for the analyses be recognized?
A: the “Executive Summary” of the results to be published will contain a chapter on the
information and databases used for preparing the map of biological importance. The people
contributing to the discussions and/or providing databases will be listed in this publication.
47. What influence will MMA have on the process to revise the priority areas?
A: MMA took responsibility for coordinating the process, organizing the workshops,
processing information suggested by experts, and ensuring a space for society to discuss,
revise, and propose the priority areas according to the various experiences and needs. The
final result should reflect the decisions produced by the working groups of the regional
workshops, using as resource information the databases compiled during the preparation
step. MMA believes the revision of the priority areas should be a participatory process, and
expects contributions from all invited sectors.
48. Are the recommendations of actions limited to those under MMA’s responsibility or can
they have a broader scope?
A: The recommended actions function as guidance to governmental planning and
intervention in the indicated areas. Since they are not mandatory, recommendations may be
broader, including responsibilities of other sectors/entities. The final result will be open to
the public and will be used by MMA to negotiate with the indicated sectors.
49. Should the participants indicate responsibilities and partners for action implementation?
A: The recommended actions will guide governmental planning and intervention in the
indicated areas, and more detailed studies will be carried out before any intervention.
Therefore, it is not possible to indicate responsibilities for implementing actions at this step
of the process.
50. Will the resulting map be mandatory for actions carried out by the Ministry of the
Environment?
A: The resulting map will guide actions carried out by the Ministry of the Environment, and
can have direct influence on governmental policies. The map should also be used by
society to demand coherence in governmental actions, which will have this output as
technical basis when in accordance with the recommendations and, when in disagreement,
will have to be adequately justified.
51. What action should be taken when conflicting actions are suggested by the working
group and consensus is not reached?
A: The event expects conflicts, since results depend on the integration of various sectors
with different opinions on each theme. Since the output should, as much as possible, reflect
the knowledge of Brazilian people based on the invited participants, the MMA is responsible
for ensuring that the process and discussions will follow the established rules. It is expected
that participants will have the necessary common sense and flexibility to generate a
democratic and participatory product.
It should always be kept in mind that the product of this process should represent the
“Priority areas for the conservation, sustainable use, and sharing of benefits form
142
biodiversity”. When conflicts cannot be negotiated, they should be documented and two
conflicting opinions should be integrated to the final product.
143
11.7. Lists of Participants of the Technical Meetings by Biome
Amazon Biome
Table 11.7.1 – List of Participants of the Technical Meeting on the Amazon Biome, held in Cuiabá/MT, from September 11
to 15, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Adriana Ramos
Instituto Socioambiental- ISA
Alexandre Aleixo
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi – MPEG
Alicia Rolla
Instituto Socioambiental- ISA
Ana Luisa Mangabeira Albernaz
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi – MPEG
Ana Margarida Coelho
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente-SEMA/MT
Ana Rafaela D'amico
Centro Nacional de Pesquisas para Conservação dos Predadores NaturaisCENAP-IBAMA/RR
Anael Aymore Jacob
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Analzita Miller
Fauna e Flora International– FFI
André Ribeiro Lamezo
Sistemas de Bases Compartilhadas de Dados Sobre a Amazônia- BCDAM/MMA
Anselmo Cristiano de Oliveira
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Antonio Guilherme Cândido da Silva
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/MT
Antonio Pacaya Ihuraqui
Centro de Conservação e Manejo de Répteis e Anfíbio-RAN-BAMA/GO
Arnaldo Carneiro Filho
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
Benjamim de Jesus Andrade de Oliveira
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Bernardo Ferreira Alves Brito
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Bruce Walker Nelson
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
Carlos Alberto de Mattos Scaramuzza
WWF-BRASIL
Carlos Cesar Durigan
Fundação Vitória Amazônica – FVA
Carlos Eduardo Marinelli
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável do
Amazonas
Célia Regina Araujo Soares
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso-UNEMAT
Cícero Augusto
Instituto Socioambiental- ISA
Ciro Campos De Souza
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
Claudia Azevedo Ramos
Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia-IPAM
Crisomar Raimundo da Silva Lobato
Secretaria Executiva de Ciência, Tecnologia e Meio Ambiente - SECTAM / PA
Cristian Barcelar Santos
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Daniela de Oliveira e Silva
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Daniella Fernandez Ezri
Greentec Consultoria e Planejamento Agro-Florestal e do Meio Ambiente
Danielle Calandino
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Danielle Celentano Augusto
Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia –IMAZON
Dário Dantas do Amaral
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi – MPEG
David Oren
The Nature Conservancy-TNC
Deis Elucy Siqueira
Centro Nacional de Desenvolvimento Sustentado das Populações TradicionaisCNPT-IBAMA/DF
Edson Guilherme
Universidade Federal do Acre-UFAC
Eduardo Martins Venticinque
Wildlife Conservation Society-Wcs
144
Eduardo Ribeiro Felizola
Greentec Consultoria e Planejamento Agro-Florestal e do Meio Ambiente
Ekena Rangel Pinagé
WWF-BRASIL
Elton Antonio Silveira
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente-SEMA/MT
Enrico Bernard
Conservation Internacional- CI
Fábio Ricardo Da Rosa
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso –UFMT
Francisco Javier Fawaz
Greentec Consultoria e Planejamento Agro-Florestal e do Meio Ambiente
Giovana Bottura
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Gustavo Vasconcellos Irgang
Instituto Centro de Vida-ICV
Helena Fany Pantaleoni Ricardo
Instituto Socioambiental- ISA
Hélida B. Nogueira Borges
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente-SEMA/MT
Henrique Pereira
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/AM
Iara Ferraz
Consultant
Ima Vieira
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi – MPEG
Iola Reis Lopes
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso –UFMT
Isabel Castro
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
João Valsecchi do Amaral
Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá-IDSM
Jose Carlos Ribeiro Reino
Cento Nacional de Estudo, Proteção e Manejo de Cavernas-CECAV-IBAMA/MT
José Laurindo Campos dos Santos
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
José Maria Cardoso da Silva
Conservation Internacional- CI
Katia Cury Roselli
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Laura Dietzsch
Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia-IPAM
Leonardo Pacheco
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/AM
Ligia Nara Vendromim
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente-SEMA/MT
Lúcia da Costa Ferreira
Universidade Estadual de Campinas-UNICAMP
Luciene Pohl
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Manoel da Silva Cunha
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Marcelo Gordo
Universidade Federal do Amazonas- UFAM
Marcos Persio Dantas
Universidade Federal do Piauí-UFPI
Marcos Roberto Ferramosca Cardoso
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente-SEMA/MT
Marcos Roberto Pinheiro
WWF-BRASIL
Marcos Rosa
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Maria da Penha Emerick de Barros
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Marina Antongiovani da Fonseca
Instituto Socioambiental- ISA
Marina Pinheiro Kluppel
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Marisete Ines Santin Catapan
WWF-BRASIL
Marissônia Lopes de Almeida
Secretaria do Planejamento e Meio Ambiente-TO
Milton Kanashiro
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária-EMBRAPA/Amazônia Oriental
Neide Yoko Watanabe
Centro de Sensoriamento Remoto - CSR-IBAMA/DF
Nelson Laturner
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente-SEMA/MT
Nely Tocantins
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso –UFMT
Normandes Matos da Silva
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente-SEMA/MT
Paulo Andreas Buckup
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi – MPEG
Paulo Magno Gabêto Martinez
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Peter Mann de Toledo
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais-INPE
Plácido Costa Junior
Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento-PNUD
Rafael Luís Fonseca
Conservation Internacional- CI
145
Rejane Andrade
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Renato Aparecido de Farias
Fundação Ecológica Cristalino –FEC
Rita de Cássia Mesquita
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável do
Amazonas
Roberto Antonelli Filho
Cooperação Técnica Alemã- GTZ
Rodrigo de Oliveira Mascarenhas
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente-SEMA/MT
Rodrigo Rodrigues
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Rogerio Azevedo
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Rogerio Cunha de Paula
Centro Nacional de Pesquisas para a Conservação dos Predadores Naturais CENAP-IBAMA/SP
Ronaldo Weigand
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Rosely Sanches
Instituto Socioambiental- ISA
Sérgio Henrique Borges
Fundação Vitória Amazônica – FVA
Sergio Travassos
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Silvania Amaral Kampel
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais-INPE
Solange Aparecida Arrolho da Silva -
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso-UNEMAT
Stephan Schwartzman
Environmental Defense Fund-EDF
Tereza Neide Nunes Vasconcelos
Secretaria de Estado de Planejamento e Coordenação Geral-SEPLAN - MT
Vicenzo Maria Lauriola
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
Walkyria Bueno Moraes
Cooperação Técnica Alemã – GTZ
William Magnusson
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
Yalmo Correia Junior
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMASinop/MT
Zita da Silva Albanês
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente-SEMA/MT
Cerrado and Pantanal Biomes
Table 11.7.2 – List of Participants of the first Technical Meeting on the Cerrado and Pantanal Biomes, held in Brasília/DF,
from July 12 to 14, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Adriana Niemeyer Pires Ferreira
MMA
Adriana Panhol Bayma
MMA/NCP
Aldicir Scariot
PNUD
Alexandre Bonesso Sampaio
IBAMA/DIREC
Alexandre Cordeiro
IBAMA/DISAM
Alfredo Palau Pena
Ibama / RAN
Ana Elisa F. Bacellar Schittini
IBAMA/DIPRO
Ana Paula Carmignotto
USP-São Carlos
Anderson Cassio Sevilha
EMBRAPA/CENARGEN
Ângela Pelin
Neotropica
Antonio Alberto Jorge Farias de Castro
UFPI
Antônio Alberto Jorge Farias de Castro
BIOTEN/UFPI
Avay Miranda Junior
NCP / MMA
Beatriz Schwantes Marimon
UNEMAT
Ben Hur Marimon Junior
UNEMAT
Bráulio F. S. Dias
MMA
Bruno Machado Teles Walter
EMBRAPA/CENARGEN
Carlos Alberto de Mattos Scaramuzza
WWF
Carolyn Elinore Barnes Proença
UnB
Cassio Soares Martins
Biodiversitas
César Victor Espírito Santo
Funatura / Rede Cerrado
Christine Strussmann
UFMT
146
Cristiano de Campos Nogueira
CI
Débora Leite Silvano
NCP / MMA
Diana Levacov
Ibama / CPB
Donald Sawyer
ISPN / CDS
Edson Sano
EMBRAPA/CPAC
Eduardo Quirino Pereira
SEPLAN-TO
Elaine Cristina Teixeira Pinto
CI
Elizabeth Arndt
IBAMA
Fabiana de Góis Aquino
EMBRAPA/CPAC
Fátima Sonoda
Neotrópica
Fernanda de Oliveira Silva
UFMG
Flávio C. J. Lima
USP
Flávio H. G. Rodrigues
UFMG / procarnívoros
Gilberto de Menezes Schittini
SDS/MMA
Gislaine Disconzi
CNAA
Guarino Colli
UnB
Guilherme Déstro
IBAMA/DIPRO
Guilherme Henrique Braga de Miranda
DPF
Guilherme Mourão
Embrapa – Pantanal
Gustavo de Oliveira Silva
MMA
Gustavo M. de Oliveira
IBAMA/DISAM
Gustavo Meyer
SDS/MMA
Helga Correa Wiederhecker
Embrapa - Cenergen
Igor Homem de Carvalho
ISPN / Pequi
Isabel Belloni Schmidt
IBAMA/DIREF
Jader Marinho-Filho
UnB
Jailton Dias
IBAMA/DIPRO
Jeanine Felfili Fagg
UnB - Eng Florestal
Joanice Lube Batilani
IBAMA
João Augusto Meira Neto
UFV
João Roberto Correia
Embrapa CPAC
José Roberto Rodrigues Pinto
UnB
José Sabino
UNIDERP
Joseth Souza
INCRA
Júlio César Roma
MMA
Julio Dalponte
UNEMAT
Laerte Guimarães Ferreira Júnior
UFG/LAPIG
Laura Tillmann Viana
NCP / MMA
Leandro Baumgarten
NAPMA / MMA
Leonardo Esteves Lopes
UFMG
Leonardo J. R. Klosovski
SRH/MMA
Lídio Coradin
Ludmilla Aguiar
EMBRAPA/CPAC
Marcelo Gonçalves de Lima
Ibama
Marcelo Lima Reis
IBAMA/DIFAP
Marcelo Matsumoto
TNC
Marcio Martins
USP
Marcos Reis Rosa
NAPMA / MMA
Maria Goreth Gonçalves Nóbrega
MMA/DCBIO
Mariana Napolitano e Ferreira
Neatus/UFT
Marissonia Lopes de Almeida
SEPLAN-TO
Maurício S. Pompeu
SRH/MMA
147
Mauro Oliveira Pires
NCP / MMA
Miguel Trefaut Rodrigues
USP
Monica Celeida Rabelo Nogueira
ISPN/Rede Cerrado
Nelson Amaral Nunan Eustáquio
MMA
Otavio A. Vuolo Marques
Butantan
Paula Hanna Valdujo
NCP / MMA
Paulo Kageyama
MMA
Paulo Santos Pompeu
UFLA
Paulo Takeo Sano
USP
Rafael Luis Fonseca
CI
Rafaela Danielli Nicola
Ecoa
Renato Alves Moreira
Oreades
Renato Neves Feio
UFV
Reuber Brandão
UnB
Ricardo Bonfim Machado
CI
Ricardo Ferreira Ribeiro
PUC-Minas
Ricardo Luiz Pires Boulhosa
Pro-Carnívoros / WCS
Rita de Cássia Condé
PROBIO
Rogério Marcos Magalhães
CGEN
Rogério Pereira Bastos
UFG
Ronaldo Gonçalves Morato
Ibama / CENAP
Sandro Menezes Silva
CI – Brasil
Sergio da Cruz Coutinho
EMBRAPA / CENARGEN
Sergio Henrique Colaça
IBAMA/DIREC
Shigeo Shiki
SDS / MMA
Sidney T. Rodrigues
WWF
Taciana Barbosa Cavalcanti
EMBRAPA
Tadeu Veiga
Geos
Ubirazilda Maria Resende
UFMS
Vanda Lúcia Ferreira
UFMS
Vânia Pivello
USP
Vivian da Silva Braz
Walfrido M. Tomas
UnB
Wolf Dieter Eberhard
Ecotrópica
EMBRAPA Pantanal
Table 11.7.3 – List of Participants of the second Technical Meeting on the Cerrado and Pantanal Biomes, held in
Brasília/DF, from October 10 to 11, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Avay Miranda Junior
NCP / MMA
Bráulio F. S. Dias
MMA
Crizanto Carvalho Brito
CGZAM / IBAMA
Débora Leite Silvano
NCP / MMA
Diana Levacov
Ibama / CPB
Eduardo Quirino Pereira
SEPLAN-TO
Elton Antônio Silveira
Isabel Belloni Schmidt
SEMA/MT
Jailton Dias
IBAMA/DIPRO
IBAMA/DIREF
Júlio César Roma
MMA
Keila E. Macladen Juarez
IBAMA/CGFAU
Laura Tillmann Viana
NCP / MMA
Leandro Baumgarten
NAPMA / MMA
Marcelo Lima Reis
IBAMA/DIFAP
148
Nelson Amaral Nunan Eustáquio
MMA
Wagner Fisher
IBAMA/DIFAP
Cassio Soares Martins
Biodiversitas
Catarina S. Ribeiro Pollastrini
CNAA
Cristiano de Campos Nogueira
CI
Donald Sawyer
ISPN / CDS
Ekena Rangel Pinagé
WWF
Fátima Sonoda
Neotrópica
Igor Homem de Carvalho
ISPN / Pequi
Jamilo Thomé Filho
CPRM
Mario Barroso Ramos-Neto
CI
Ricardo Bonfim Machado
CI
Sandro Menezes Silva
CI – Brasil
Aldicir Scariot
PNUD
Beatriz Schwantes Marimon
UNEMAT
Ben Hur Marimon Junior
UNEMAT
Carolyn Elinore Barnes Proença
UnB
Christine Strussmann
UFMT
Eddie Lenza de Oliveira
UNEMAT
Fabiana de Góis Aquino
EMBRAPA/CPAC
Gabriela Rocha
Elabore Consultoria
Guilherme Henrique Braga de Miranda
DPF
Guilherme Mourão
Embrapa – Pantanal
José Roberto Rodrigues Pinto
UnB
Leonardo Esteves Lopes
UFMG
Ludmilla Aguiar
EMBRAPA/CPAC
Manuel Eduardo Ferreira
UFG/LAPIG
Marcio Martins
USP
Mariana Napolitano e Ferreira
Neatus/UFT
Miguel Trefaut Rodrigues
USP
Paulo Santos Pompeu
UFLA
Paulo Takeo Sano
USP
Reuber Brandão
UnB
Rodiney Mauro
Embrapa
Tadeu Veiga
Geos
Ubirazilda Maria Resende
UFMS
Vanda Lúcia Ferreira
UFMS
Vânia Pivello
USP
Walfrido M. Tomas
EMBRAPA Pantanal
Caatinga Biome
Table 11.7.4 – List of Participants of the Technical Meeting on the Caatinga Biome, held in Recife/PE, from September 25
to 27, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Adeodato Ari C. Salviano
Alberto Jorge da Rocha Silva
Alexandrina Sobreira de Moura
UFPI
DCBIO / SBF / MMA
SECTMA
Antônio Edson Guimarães Farias
Auridan Marinho Cordeiro
MMA
SECTMA
Caren C. Dalmolin
IBAMA - DIREC
Carlos Klink
TNC
149
Cristina Aparecida Gonçalves Rodrigues
EMBRAPA / CNPM
Daniel Duarte Pereira
UFPB / INSA
Diva Maria Borges Nojosa
UFC
Enrique Riegelhaupt
GEF - CAATINGA
Flora Acuña Juncá
UEFS
Frans Pareyn
APNE
Gerda Nickel Maia
AUTÔNOMA
Iêdo Bezerra de Sá
EMBRAPA SEMI-ÁRIDO
Isabel Cristina Machado
UFPE
João Ambrósio de A. Filho
EMBRAPA CAPRINOS
João Carlos C. Oliveira
DAP / SBF / MMA
João Carlos Fragoso
GEF - CAATINGA
Johann Gnadlinger
IRPAA
José Cordeiro dos Santos
SECTMA
José Luiz Vieira da Cruz Filho
APNE
Keiko Fueta Pelizzaro
IBAMA - DIREC
Luciano J. de O. Accioly
EMBRAPA SOLOS
Luiz Antônio Cestaro
UFRN / DGE
Marcos Reis Rosa
MMA/SBF
Maria Angélica Figueiredo
UFC
Maria Auxiliadora Gariglio
MMA / PNF
Maria da Penha E. de Barros
MMA / NPC
Maria de Pompéia Corrêa de Araújo Coelho
SNE
Maria Regina V. Barbosa
UFPB
Newton Barcellos
MMA / PNF
Paulo Gabêto
MMA
Renato Prado
MMA / SBF
Rodrigo Castro
Rosimary de Araújo
Sandra E. T. Miranda de Morais
ASSOCIAÇÃO CAATINGA
ASS. INDÍGENA CARIRI
SEBRAE
Sílvia A. Picchiani
ASAPAN - ASA
Sílvio R. Santana
FUND. GRUPO ESQUEL
Sônia Aline Roda
CEPAN
Terezinha Menezes Uchôa
SECTMA
Vera Christina P. Pastorino
CECAN / IBAMA
Washington França Rocha
UEFS
Weber Andrade de Girão e Silva
AQUASIS
Table 11.7.5 – List of Participants of the Technical Consultations for the Caatinga Biome, held in Fortaleza/CE (26 October
2006), Recife/PE (01 November 2006), and Salvador/BA (06 November 2006).
NAME
INSTITUTION
FORTALEZA
Afrânio Fernandes
UFC
Antonio Tavares
Breno Magalhães Freitas
Diva Borges Nojosa
UFC
Edson Paula Nunes
Eliete Lima de Paula Zárate
UFC
Francisca Soares de Araújo
UFC
Lígia Queiroz Matias
Luis Wilson Limaverde
UFC
Maria Angélica Figueiredo
UFC
150
Paulo Thiers Pinto
AQUASIS
Weber Andrade de Girão e Silva
AQUASIS
Yves Quinet
UECE
RECIFE
Daniel Duarte Pereira
UFPB
Elcida de Lima Araújo
UFPRPE
Frans Pareyn
APNE
José Cordeiro dos Santos
SECTMA
Rita de Cássia Araújo Pereira
IPA
SALVADOR
Alexandre Clistenes de Alcântara Santos
UEFS Biology (Fauna)
Ana Maria Giulietti
UEFS
Angêla Zanata
UFBA
Claudia Leme
UFBA
Fábio Bandeira
UEFS
Janaína de Moraes de Lima
CRA - trainee
Lenise Guedes
UFBA
Luis Gusmão
UEFS
Marcelo Napoli
UFBA
Maria Aparecida Jose de Oliveira
UFBA
Mariana Porto
CRA - trainee
Marjorie Nolasco
UEFS
Sonia Regina Silva Portugal
CRA-Salvador
Washington Rocha
UEFS
Atlantic Forest Biome
Table 11.7.6 – List of Participants of the second Technical Meeting on the Atlantic Forest Biome, held in São Roque/SP,
from April 10 to 12, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Adriana Paese
Conservação Internacional
Adriano Paglia
Conservação Internacional
Alexsander R. Antunes
Instituto Florestal - SP
Ana Elisa Schittini
CGZAM / COZAM / IBAMA
Anita Diederichsen
The Nature Conservancy - TNC/Brasil
Antônio J. S. Argolo
Universidade Estadual Santa Cruz - UESC
Bárbara H. S. Prado
Instituto Florestal - SP
Caio Gracco Machado
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana - UEFS / SOB
Carla Madureira Cruz
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ
Carlos Alfredo Joly
Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP
Carlos Frederico D. da Rocha
Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ
Cássio Soares Martins
Biodiversitas
Christiane Holvorcem
NAPMA/SBF/MMA
Eduardo H. Ditt
IPÊ - Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas
Erika Guimarães
Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica
Fávio Vieira
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG
Gláucia Moreira Drummond
Biodiversitas
Guilherme Destro
CGZAM / COZAM / IBAMA
Gustavo Accacio
Ilsi Boldrini
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS
Jacques Delabie
Universidade Estadual Santa Cruz - UESC / CEPLAC
151
Jaqueline Goerck
Birdlife/Save - Brasil
João Batista Campos
Instituto Ambiental do Paraná
João de Deus Medeiros
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC / GPC
João L. R. Albuquerque
CN - RBMA
Leandro Baumgarten
NAPMA/SBF/MMA
Lúcia Sevegnani
Universidade Regional de Blumenau - FURB
Luciana L. Simões
WWF - Brasil
Luis Henrique de Lima
NZCM/SBF/MMA
Luiz Fernando Barros
NAPMA/SBF/MMA
Luiz Paulo Pinto
Conservação Internacional
Marcia Hirota
Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica
Marcio Rossi
Instituto Florestal - SP
Marco A. Nalon
Instituto Florestal - SP
Marcos Reis Rosa
NAPMA/SBF/MMA
Maria Alice Alvez
Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ
Mario Mantovani
Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica
Mauricio Savi
NAPMA/SBF/MMA
Natália M. Ivanaukas
Instituto Florestal - SP
Paula H. Valdujo
NCP/SBF/MMA
Paulo A. Buckup
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ / MN
Paulo Roberto Castella
SEMA/PR
Pedro Develey
Birdlife/ Save - Brasil
Raquel Teixeira Moura
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG / IESB
Raul Vicens
Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF
Ricardo Brochado Alves da Silva
NAPMA/SBF/MMA
Ricardo M.
Sociedade de Pesquisa em Vida Selvagem e Educação Ambiental - SPVS
Ricardo S. Rosa
Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB
Rita de Cássia Condé
PROBIO / MMA
Rogério Vereza Azevedo
DAP/SBF/MMA
Rudi R. Laps
Universidade Regional de Blumenau - FURB
Sérgio Lucena Mendes
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo - UFES / IPEMA
Sidney Rodrigues
WWF – Brasil
Sofia Campiolo
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UESC / Inst. Dríades
Sônia A. Roda
CEPAN
Wigold B. Schaffer
NAPMA/SBF/MMA
Pampas Biome
Table 11.7.7 – List of Participants of the Technical Meeting on the Pampas Biome, held in Porto Alegre/RS, from March 9
to 10, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Adalberto Miura
CPPCT - EMBRAPA
Aino Victor Ávila Jacques
Dep. Plantas Forrageiras e Agrometeorologia - UFRGS
Alexandre Krob
Curicaca
Ana Elisa Schittini
CGZAM / IBAMA
Ana Rosa Bered
FEPAM / SEMA
Andréa Mittlemann
Pelotas – Embrapa Clima Temperado
Andrea Pinto Loguercio
UERGS
Anita Diederichsen
TNC - The Nature Conservaçy
Carla S. Fontana
Museu de Ciências e Tecnologia. PUCRS
Carlos Alberto Flores
Agronomist, Embrapa/Clima Temperado
152
Carlos Alberto Scaramuzza
WWF - Brasil
Carlos Gustavo Tornquist
SCP - RS
Cecilia VolKmer-Ribeiro
FZB
Cibele Indrusiak*
IBAMA - RS
Demétrio Luiz Guadagnin
Biologist, Unisinos
Dorival R. Silva
IBAMA - RS
Eduardo Eizirik*
PUCRS
Élen N. Garcia
UFPEL
Eridiane Lopes Silva
IBAMA - RS
Fábio Garagorry
UFSM
Fernando Gertum Becker
Biologist, UFRGS Centro de Ecologia
Fernando L. F. Quadros
Santa Maria - UFSM
Giovanni Vinciprova
Glayson Benke
Museu de Ciências Naturais. FZB/RS
Heinrich Hasenack
Lab. de Geoprocessamento - Depto. de Ecologia. UFRGS
Ilsi Iob Boldrini
Depto. Botânica - UFRGS
Jan Karel Felix Mahler*
Curicaca
João Larocca
UNISINOS
Jorge Luiz Waechter
Depto. Botânica - UFRGS
José Francisco Valls
CENARGEN. EMPBRAPA
José Luís Passos Cordeiro
Biologist, UFRGS Centro de Ecologia
José Pedro Trindade
CPPSUL - EMBRAPA
Julio Cesar Bicca-Marques*
PUCRS
Leandro Baumgarten
NAPMA / SBF / MMA
Lílian Eggers
Biologist, UFRGS Depatamento de Botânica
Luis Gustavo Mähler
IBAMA - RS
Luís Rios de Moura Baptista
Depto. Botânica - UFRGS
Luiz Fernando Barrros
NAPMA / SBF / MMA
Luiza Chomenko
FZB
Marcio Borges Martins
FZB
Marcos Rosa
NAPMA / SBF / MMA
Maria de Lourdes A. de Oliveira
FZB
Maria Luiza Porto
UFRGS
Marilice C. Garrastazu
CPACT / EMBRAPA
Miguel Dall’Agnol
Dep. Plantas Forrageiras e Agrometeorologia - UFRGS
Paula H. Valdujo
NCP / SBF / MMA
Pedro Develey
Birdlife
Rafael Antunes Dias
UCPEL
Ricado Dobrovolski
UFRGS
Ricardo Aranha Ramos
MCN - FZB
Rodrigo Venzon
Curicaca
Roger Borges Silva
UNISINOS
Rogério Both
UFRGS - Centro de Ecologia
Sandra C. Muller
Depto. Ecologia - UFRGS
Sandro Klippel
IBAMA - RS
Silvia Mara Paggi
FEPAM / SEMA
Silvia T. S. Miotto
Depto. Botânica - UFRGS
Valério De Patta Pillar
Depto. Ecologia - UFRGS
Wigold B. Schaffer
NAPMA / SBF / MMA
Coastal and Marine Zone
153
Table 11.7.8 – List of Participants of the first Technical Meeting on the Coastal and Marine Zone, held in Porto Alegre/RS,
from March 9 to 10, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Carlos Emílio Bemvenuti
Fundação Universidade Federal de Rio Grande - FURG
Eduardo Resende Secchi
Fundação Universidade Federal de Rio Grande - FURG
João Paes Vieira Sobrinho
Fundação Universidade Federal de Rio Grande - FURG
Virginia Maria Tavano Garcia
Fundação Universidade Federal de Rio Grande - FURG
Joaquim Olinto Branco
Fundação Universidade Federal de Rio Grande - FURG
Rafael Antunes Dias
Universidade Católica de Pelotas - UCP/RS
Silvio Jablonsky
Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ
Paulo Henrique Ott
Grupo de Estudos de MamÍferos Aquáticos do Rio G. do Sul - GEMARS
FEEVALE
Daniel Danilewicz
Grupo de Estudos de MamÍferos Aquáticos do Rio G. do Sul - GEMARS
Ignácio Moreno
Grupo de Estudos de MamÍferos Aquáticos do Rio G. do Sul - GEMARS
Pontifícia Universidade Católica - PUC-RS
Glayson Ariel Bencke
Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul - FZB/RS
Jan Karel Felix Mähler Jr.
SEMA/DEFAP
Mônica Brick Peres
IBAMA/CEPERG; Instituto Igaré
Sandro Klippel
IBAMA/Gerex-RS; Instituto Igaré
Roberto Sforza (Borel)
Projeto TAMAR/IBAMA
Ana Paula Prates
Coordinator, NZCM/SBF/ MMA
Livia de Laia Loiola
NZCM/SBF/MMA
João Luiz Nicolodi
GERCOM/SQA/MMA
Anthony Chatwin
The Nature Conservancy - TNC
Luis Henrique de Lima
Consultant, NZCM/SBF/MMA
Ricardo Aranha Ramos
Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul - FZB/RS
Norberto Olmiro Horn Filho
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC
Table 11.7.9 – List of Participants of the second Technical Meeting on the Coastal and Marine Zone, held in São Luiz/MA,
from May 24 to 26, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Amilcar Mendes
PEC/MPEG
Ana Paula Leite Prates
Coordinator, NZCM/SBF/MMA
Ana Tereza Lyra Lopes
Deto. Biologia/UFMA
Anthony Chatwin
TNC/Washington
Antonio Augusto F. Rodrigues
UFMA
Carolina Alvite
IBAMA/MA
Cristina Senna
MPEG/MCT
Deolindo Moura Neto
IBAMA/PI/Resex Delta/DISAM
Flavia R. Mochel
UFMA
Javier Fawaz
Consultant, MMA
João Ubiratan Santos
Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi
Juliana Cristina Fukuda
IBAMA/MA
Katia Cristina de Araújo Silva
UFRA
Laís de Morais Rêco Silva
UFMA
Livia de Laia Loiola
MMA/SBF/NZCM
Lourdes Furtado
Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi
Luis Henrique de Lima
Consultant, NZCM/SBF/MMA
Luis Mauricio Abdon
IEPA
Luis Roberto Takiyama
IEPA
Magnus Machado Severo
IBAMA/PI
Márcio Barragana
IBAMA/PI
154
Marcos da Silva Cunha
IBAMA/PARNA Cabo Orange
Maria de Nazaré do Carmo Bastos
Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi
Maria Thereza Prost
MPEG/MCT
Odilon T. de Melo
UFMA/DEOLI
Paulo Sérgio Altieri dos Santos
GERCO/SECTAM-PA
Pedro W. R. Sousa Filho
CG/UFPA
Raquel Barreto
IBAMA/CSR
Salustiano Vilar da Costa Neto
IEPA
Victoria J. Isaac
UFPA
Waldemar L. Vergara Filho
CNPT/IBAMA
Walter Muedas
UFMA/DEOLI
Zafira O. de Almeida
UEMA
Table 11.7.10 – List of Participants of the third Technical Meeting on the Coastal and Marine Zone, held in Tamandaré/PE,
from July 11 to 13, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Alberto Campos
AQUASIS
Ana Lídia de Araújo Ramos
CSR/IBAMA
Ana Paula Prates
Coordinator, NZCM/SBF/MMA
André Gil Sales da Silva
UFAL, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Zoologia.
Andrei Figueiredo Prates Longo
Anthony Chatwin
TNC/Washington
Antônio Clerton Pontes
IBAMA
Ayda Alcantara
UFS – Departamento de biologia, Núcleo de Ecossistemas Costeiros
Beatrice Padovani Ferreira
UFPE
Carla Marcon
APA Mamamguape
Carla Marques
CEPENE/IBAMA
Carolina Alvite
CMA/IBAMA
César Coelho
TAMAR/IBAMA - Base de Pirambu (Base Mãe)
Clemente Coelho Junio
Projeto Recife-Olinda; PROMANG
Daniele Blanc
NZCM/MMA
Eduardo Godoy
DIREC/IBAMA
UFRN - Centro de Biociências - Departamento de Oceanografia e Limnologia,
Laboratório de Macroalgas
UFRN, Centro de Biociências, Departamento de Oceanografia e Limnologia.
Eliane Marinho
Eneida Eskinazi Sant´Anna
Estevão Vieira Tanajura Carvalho
CSR/IBAMA
Eurico Marcovaldi
Instituto Baleia Jubarte
Fabiana Bicurdo
CGFAU/IBAMA
Fábio Moreira Correa
CEPENE/IBAMA
Gecely Rodrigues Alves Rocha
UESC, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas.
George Olavo Mattos e Silva
UEFS, Departamento de Ciências Biológica, Laboratório de Biologia Pesqueira.
Guilherme Dutra
Conservação Internacional
UFPB, Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza - Departamento de Sistemática
e Ecologia
Consultant, MMA
Ierece Rosa
Javier Fawaz
João Marcello Camargo
CEPENE/IBAMA
José Martins
Projeto Golfinho Rotador
Leandro Baumgarten
Consultant, NAPMA/SBF/MMA
Leopoldo Gerahdingher
ECOMAR - Associação de Estudos Costeiros e Marinhos dos Abrolhos
Liana Mendes
UFRN, Centro de Biociências, Departamento de Oceanografia e Limnologia
Luis Henrique de Lima
Consultant, NZCM/SBF/MMA
Luis Otávio Frota
DIFAP/IBAMA
Márcia Hirota
SOS Mata Atlântica
Maria Betania Matos de Carvalho
SUDEMA/PB
155
Mauro Maida
IBAMA, Centro de Pesquisa para a Conservação das Aves Silvestres, Sede
Nacional.
UFPE, Centro de Tecnologia, Departamento de Oceanografia.
Myrna Landim
UFS – Departamento de biologia, Núcleo de Ecossistemas Costeiros
Paulo Antunes Horta Junior
UFBA, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia
Paulo de Oliveira Mafalda Junior
UFBA
UFRPE, Departamenro de Pesca e Aquicultura, Laboratõrio de Ecologia Marinha
Lemar.
IBAMA
Maria Flávia Conti Nunes
Paulo Travassos
Pedro Augusto Macedo Lins
Regis Pinto de Lima
CMA/IBAMA
Renato de Almeida
SOS Mata Atlântica
Ricardo de Souza Rosa
UFPB, Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza - Campus I.
Ricardo Faria do Amaral
UFRN, Centro de Ciências Exatas, Departamento de Geologia.
Roberto Sforza
Projeto TAMAR - Coordenação Nacional
Rogério H. Vereza de Azevedo
DAP/MMA
Rosângela Lessa
UFRPE, Departamento de Pesca, Laboratório de Oceanografia Pesqueira.
Sigrid Leitão
UFPE, Centro de Tecnologia, Departamento de Oceanografia
Sonia Maria Barreto Pereira
UFRPE, Departamento de Biologia, Área de Botânica.
Tereza Cristina Medeiros de Araújo
UFPE, Centro de Tecnologia, Departamento de Oceanografia.
Thales Ushizima
CEPENE/IBAMA
Tito Monteiro da Cruz Lotufo
UFC, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Departamento de Engenharia de Pesca.
Table 11.7.11 – List of Participants of the fourth Technical Meeting on the Coastal and Marine Zone, held in
Teresópolis/RJ, from September 26 to 28, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Adilson Fransozo
IB/Zoologia/UNESP - Botucatu
Adriana Carvalhal Fonseca
DIREC/IBAMA
Alexander Turra
IO/USP
Alexandre Souza
DILIC/IBAMA
Ana Paula Leite Prates
Coordinator, NZCM/SBF/MMA
André Silva Barreto
Universidade do Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI
Angela de Barros Sumavielle
Parque Nacional
Antonia Cecília Zacagnini Amaral
IB/ZOOLOGIA/UNICAMP
Antonio Eduardo Poleti
Universidade de Santos / Agência Costeira
Antony Chatwin
TNC/Washington
Carlos Alberto Borzone
CEM/UFPR
Carlos Eduardo Leite Ferreira
Universidade Federal Fluminense
Celia Regina de Gouveia Souza
Instituto Geológico-SMA
Cláudia Cavalcanti Rocha Campos
COFAU/DIFAP/IBAMA
Clemente Coelho Junior
SOS Mata Atlântica
Cyl Farney Catarino de Sá
Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro/MMA
Daniele Blanc
NZCM/SBF/MMA
Débora de Oliveira Pires
Museu Nacional/UFRJ
Dora Hees de Negreiros
Comitê da Região Hidrográfica da Baía de Guanabara e dos Sistemas
Lagunares de Maricá e Jacarepagua
Enrico Marone
Instituto BioAtlântica
Eunice da Costa Machado
CEM/UFPR
Fabrício Gandini
Instituto Maramar
Felipe Martins Mello
MMA - Projeto Corredores Ecológicos
Fernando Moraes
Museu Nacional/UFRJ
Gabriel Daldegan
TNC - Trainee
Gilberto Fonseca Barroso
UFES
Henry Louis Spach
CEM/UFPR
João Luiz Nicolodi
GERCOM/MMA
156
Joel Christopher Creed
IB/ECOLOGIA/UFRJ
Leandro Baumgarten
Consultant, NAPMA/SBF/MMA
Leize F. Rodrigues
IBAMA/APA Guapumirim
Leonardo Rubi Rörig
Universidade do Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI
Luis Henrique de Lima
Consultant, NZCM/MMA
Marcelo Antonio Amaro Pinheiro
UNESP - São Vicente.
Márcia Engel
Instituto Baleia Jubarte
Márcia Figueiredo Creed
Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro/MMA
Márcia Hirota
SOS Mata Atlântica
Marcus Henrique Carneiro
Instituto de Pesca de São Paulo
Maria da Penha Padovan
Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisa, Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural - Incaper
Mário Luiz Gomes Soares
Centro de Tecnologia e Ciências/UFRJ
Mario Manoel Rollo Junior
UNESP - São Vicente.
Maurício Garcia Camargo
CEM/UFPR
Mauricio Hostim Silva
Projeto Meros do Brasil
Mônica Maria Pereira Tognella De Rosa
Depto de Ecologia e Recursos Naturais/UFES
Otto Bismarck Fazzano Gadig
UNESP - São Vicente.
Patrícia Elizabeth da Veiga Rizzi
DIREC/IBAMA
Patrícia Teresa Monteiro Cunningham
IO/USP
Paulo Ricardo Schwingel
Universidade do Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI
Paulo Roberto Castella
SEMA - Paraná
Raquel Barreto
CSR/IBAMA
Renato David Ghisolfi
Depto de Ecologia e Recursos Naturais/UFES
Renato de Almeida
SOS Mata Atlântica
Ricardo Palamar Menghini
SOS Mata Atlântica
Rogério H. Vereza de Azevedo
DAP/MMA
Rosemeri Carvalho Marenzi
Universidade do Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI
Sandra Ribeiro
IEMA - Instituto Estadual de Meio Ambiente
Selma Dzimidas Rodrigues
UNESP - São Vicente.
Tânia Marcia Costa
UNESP - São Vicente.
Viviane de Formiga Xavier Lund
IBAMA/APA Guapumirim
Yara Schaeffer Novelli
IO/USP
157
11.8. Lists of Participants of the Regional Workshops by Biome
Amazon Biome
Table 11.8.1 – List of Participants of the first Regional Workshop on the Amazon Biome, held in Brasília/DF, from
October 24 to 27, 2006.
NAME
Adriana Soares de Carvalho
INSTITUTION
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/MA
Alan Franco
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Alan Razera
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Alexandre Cordeiro
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Alexandre Lantelme Kirovssky
Secretaria Especial de Aqüicultura e Pesca - SEAP
Alicia Rolla
Instituto Socioambiental- ISA
Almir Suruí
Organização Metareilá
Ana Luisa Mangabeira Albernaz
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - MPEG
Ana Rafaela D'amico
Centro Nacional de Pesquisas para Conservação dos Predadores NaturaisCENAP-IBAMA/RR
Analzita Miller
Fauna e Flora International– FFI
André Martius Cruz
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Andrezza Alves Spexoto
Instituto Ouro Verde-IOV
Aniceto Cantanhede Filho
Secretaria Especial de Políticas de Promoção da Igualdade Racial- SEPPIR
Anselmo Cristiano De Oliveira
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Antonio Mendes
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/TO
Ariana Cella Ribeiro
Projetos Ecoporé
Arnaldo Carneiro Filho
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
Atanagildo de Deus Matos
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Benício Melo Filho
Sistema de Proteção Ambiental da Amazônia-SIPAM
Benjamin de Jesus Andrade de Oliveira
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Bonifácio Orebewe Wa'adahite
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Celia Regina Araújo Soares
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso-UNEMAT
Clarice Guerra
Confederação Nacional da Indústria-CNI
Cristina Velasquez
Instituto Socioambiental- ISA
Dalton Antunes
Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária - INCRA
Daniela de Oliveira e Silva
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Dante Renato Corrêa Buzzetti
Instituto Centro de Vida- ICV
Denise Sasaki
Fundação Ecológica Cristalino -FEC
Diogo Neves Regis
Greentec Consultoria e Planejamento Agro-Florestal e do Meio Ambiente
Eduardo Ribeiro dos Santos
Universidade do Tocantins-UNITINS
Eduardo Ribeiro Felizola
Greentec Consultoria e Planejamento Agro-Florestal e do Meio Ambiente
Ekena Rangel Pinagé
WWF-BRASIL
Elisângela Sanches Januário
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário- MDA
Elton Antonio Silveira
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente-SEMA/MT
Eunice da Conceição Costa
Grupo de Trabalho Amazônico-GTA
Fernanda Carvalho
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Fernando Castanheira Neto
Confederação Nacional da Indústria-CNI
Fernando Regis Siqueira
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Francisco Javier Fawaz
Greentec Consultoria e Planejamento Agro-Florestal e do Meio Ambiente
Gabriel Silva Pedrazzanni
Fundação Nacional do Índio- FUNAI
Geraldo Nonato Menezes
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Gilberto da Silva
Fundação Nacional do Índio- FUNAI
Giovana Bottura
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
158
Glauko Correa da Silva
Grupo de Trabalho Amazônico-GTA
Guilherme Augusto Nogueira Borges
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso-UNEMAT
Gustavo Vasconcellos Irgang
Instituto Centro de Vida- ICV
Helena Fany Pantaleoni Ricardo
Instituto Socioambiental- ISA
Isabel de Castro Silva
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Israel Correa Vale Junior
Kanindé Associação de Defesa Etno Ambiental
Jacira Firmino Neves
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Jaiton Dias
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
João Batista de Pinho
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso -UFMT
João Bosco Campos
Grupo de Trabalho Amazônico-GTA
João Carlos de Petribú Dé Carli Filho
Confederação da Agricultura e Pecuária do Brasil-CNA
João Kwanha Xerente
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Joaquim Belo
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Jose Luiz Viera
Associação Plantas do Nordeste - APNE/CAATINGA
José Wilson da Silva
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Jucyneia Brito
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Kátia Cury
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Laura Dietzsch
Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia-IPAM
Leonardo Pacheco
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/AM
Lucia Helena de Oliveira
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Luciene Pohl
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Luiz Augusto Mesquita de Azevedo
Grupo de Trabalho Amazônico-GTA
Manoel da Silva Cunha
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Manuella Andrade de Souza
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/PA
Marcelo Cavallini
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Marcia Mafra
Casa Civil
Márcia Pagore
Cooperação Técnica Alemã- GTZ
Marcos Roberto Pinheiro
WWF-BRASIL
Marcos Rosa
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Maria Alice
Cooperação Técnica Alemã- GTZ
Maria Angélica Toniolo
The Nature Conservancy-TNC
Maria do Socorro Teixeira Lima
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Maria Faustina dos Santos
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Maria Nice Machado Aires
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Marluce Messias
Universidade Federal de Rondônia-UNIR
Marlucia Martins
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - MPEG
Nelson Laturner
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente-SEMA/MT
Nicélio Rodrigues Ramos
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Nilfo Wandscheer
Grupo de Trabalho Amazônico-GTA
Nilo Fernando Antunes de Magalhães
Secretaria de Estado do desenvolvimento Ambiental - SEDAM/RO
Paul Elliott Little
Sociedade Brasileira para o Progresso da Ciência-SBPC
Paulo Rogério Gonçalves
Alternativas para a Pequena Agricultura no Tocantins -APA/TO
Pedro Cunha
Agência Nacional de Águas-ANA
Raquel Trevizam
Sistema de Proteção Ambiental da Amazônia-SIPAM
Rejane Andrade
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Renato Aparecido de Farias
Fundação Ecológica Cristalino -FEC
Rodrigo Dutra
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/MT
Rodrigo Rodrigues
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Rômulo Rogêrio Jácome Mascarenhas
Instituto Natureza do Tocantins -NATURATINS
Ronaldo Weigand
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Rosenilde Gregorio dos Santos Costa
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Rubens Marques Rondon Neto
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso-UNEMAT
159
Sergio Travassos
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Sidney Tadeu Rodrigues
WWF-BRASIL
Suzane Guedes Barbosa
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/MA
Sylvian Desmouliere
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
Tatiany Barata
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Valdir A Steinke
Secretaria Especial de Políticas de Promoção da Igualdade Racial- SEPPIR
Vanessa Aires Sardinha Sousa
Associação de Conservação do Meio Ambiente e Proteção Integral de
Alimentos da Amazônia - GAIA
Vicente José Puhl
Grupo de Trabalho Amazônico-GTA
Viviane Cardoso Pires
Projeto AMAVIDA
Wallace Marinho Moraes
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Table 11.8.2 – List of Participants of the second Regional Workshop on the Amazon Biome, held in Belém/PA, from
November 6 to 9, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Ak' Jabor Kaiapó
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Alexandre Aleixo
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - MPEG
Alexandre Lantelme Kirovssky
Secretaria Especial de Aqüicultura e Pesca - SEAP
Alicia Rolla
Instituto Socioambiental- ISA
Amelia Ferreira Peres
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Ana Luisa Mangabeira Albernaz
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - MPEG
Ana Rosa Mesquita de Figueiredo
Cooperação Técnica Alemã- GTZ
Analzita Miller
Fauna e Flora International– FFI
Andréa Von Der Heyde Lamberts
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/RR
Anselmo Cristiano de Oliveira
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Arlete Silva Almeida
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - MPEG
Arnaldo Carneiro Filho
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia - INPA
Atanagildo de Deus Matos
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Auricélio Batista Brandão
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Calixto Pinto de Souza
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Carlos Alberto de Mattos Scaramuzza
WWF-BRASIL
Carlos José Esteves Gondim
Grupo de Ação Ecológica Novos Curupiras
Carlos Peres
Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation
Cícero Augusto
Instituto Socioambiental- ISA
Ciro Campos de Souza
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia - INPA
Claudia Regina de Almeida
Fundação Estadual do Meio Ambiente, Ciência e Tecnologia de RoraimaFEMACT/RR
Crisomar Raimundo da Silva Lobato
Secretaria Executiva de Ciência, Tecnologia e Meio Ambiente - SECTAM / PA
Daniel Lopes Jordy
Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária - INCRA
Daniela de Oliveira e Silva
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Daniele Gidsicki
Sistema de Proteção Ambiental da Amazônia-SIPAM
Danielle Celentano Augusto
Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia -IMAZON
Diogo Neves Regis
Greentec Consultoria e Planejamento Agro-Florestal e do Meio Ambiente
Eduardo Ribeiro Felizola
Greentec Consultoria e Planejamento Agro-Florestal e do Meio Ambiente
Elisângela Sanches Januário
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário- MDA
Enrico Bernard
Conservation Internacional- CI
Erivaldo Almeida Cruz
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Erivan Cardoso Nogueira
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Erivan Moraes de Almeida
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Ernesto Maues da Serra Freire
Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária - INCRA
Fani Mamede
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário- MDA
Fernanda Carvalho
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
160
Flavia Pinto
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
Francisco Erivan A. Bezerra
Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária - INCRA
Francisco Javier Fawaz
Greentec Consultoria e Planejamento Agro-Florestal e do Meio Ambiente
Gilberto da Silva
Fundação Nacional do Índio- FUNAI
Gustavo Schuwartz
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária-EMBRAPA/CPATU
Hilza Domingos Silva dos Santos Arcos
Grupo de Pesquisa e Extensão em Sistemas Agroflorestais do Acre-PESACRE
Iara Ferraz
Consultora Autônoma
Irandi de Oliveira Pantoja
Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária - INCRA
Isabel Castro
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Jackson Nascimento Pereira
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Jesse James Lima da Costa
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente- SEMA/AP
Joana D'Arc Carmo Arouck Ferreira
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística-IBGE
João Valsecchi do Amaral
Instituto de desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá- IDSM
Joaquim Belo
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
José Cristiano Martins Nunes
Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária - INCRA
José de Souza Silva Junior
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - MPEG
José Eduardo Lozano Badialli
Instituto de Pesquisa Ecológica- IPÊ
José Heder Benatti
Universidade Federal do Pará-UFPA
José Maria Barbosa de Aquino
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Juan Carlos Carrasco Rueda
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável (SDS)Central de Associações Agro-extrativistas de Manicoré-CAAM
Jucyrnei Alencar Canizo De Brito
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Julio Cesar Rodriguez Tello
Universidade Federal do Amazonas- UFAM
Keith Spalding Brown Junior
Universidade Estadual de Campinas-UNICAMP
Laura Dietzsch
Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia-IPAM
Leandro Valle Ferreira
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - MPEG
Leonardo Pacheco
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/AM
Leticia Rangel Tura
Federação de Órgãos para Assistência Social e Educacional - FASE
Livaldo Sarmento da Silva
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Luciana Surita Macedo
Secretaria Municipal de Gestão Ambiental e Assuntos Indígenas
Luciene Pohl
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Lucyana Pereira Barros
The Nature Conservancy-TNC
Luis Carlos Albuquerque Monte (Indio)
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Luiz Carlos Gomes de Lima
Grupo de Trabalho Amazônico-GTA/RR
Luiz Vasconcelos da Silva
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Manoel da Cruz Cosme de Siqueira
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Manoel da Silva Cunha
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Manoel Pantoja
Federação de Órgãos para Assistência Social e Educacional - FASE
Marcelo Cavalinni
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Marcelo Creão
WWF-BRASIL
Marcia Motta Maues
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária-EMBRAPA/CPATU
Marcia Tagore
Cooperação Técnica Alemã- GTZ
Marcos Kowarich
Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária - INCRA
Marcos Roberto Pinheiro
WWF-BRASIL
Marcos Rosa
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Marcos Silveira
Universidade Federal do Acre-UFAC
Maria Isabel Rodrigues
Secretaria Especial de Políticas de Promoção da Igualdade Racial- SEPPIR
Maria Lucia Aires de Mendonça Neto
Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária - INCRA
Marina Antongiovani da Fonseca
Instituto Socioambiental- ISA
Marinus S. Hoogmoed
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - MPEG
Mario Menezes
Amigos da Terra da Amazônia
Marisa Fonseca
Sistema de Proteção Ambiental da Amazônia-SIPAM
161
Marlúcia Bonifácio Martins
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - MPEG
Mauro Pires
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Milton Kanashiro
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária-EMBRAPA ORIENTAL
Moacyr Araújo Silva
WWF-BRASIL
Nelson Chada
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/PA
Nilson Pantoja
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/PA
Queops Silva de Melo
Grupo de Trabalho Amazônico-GTA/ REGIONAL PURUS
Rafael Luís Fonseca
Conservation International- CI
Rafael Torgone Vicente Silva
Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária - INCRA
Reinaldo Imbrozio Barbosa
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
Rejane Andrade
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Rita de Cássia Mesquita
Secretaria do Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável do AmazonasSDS/ Secretaria Executiva Adjunta de Projetos Especiais -SEAPE
Roberto Francisco Gomes
Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária - INCRA
Rodrigo Rodrigues
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Rogerio Azevedo
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Rogério Lopes Meireles
Instituto de Ensino Superior da Amazônia-IESA
Ronaldo Weigand
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Samuel Soares de Almeida
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - MPEG
Sergio Costa
Sistema de Proteção Ambiental da Amazônia-SIPAM
Sidney Tadeu Rodrigues
WWF-BRASIL
Silvio José Pereira
Sistema de Proteção Ambiental da Amazônia-SIPAM
Suely Aparecida Marques Aguiar
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - MPEG
Sylvian Desmouliere
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
Tarcisio Feitosa Da Silva
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Tatiany Elizabeth Barata Pereira
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Tereza Cristina Avila Pires
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - MPEG
Valter Diaules Wolschick Freitag
ECONORTE
Vanderleide Ferreira de Souza
Conselho Nacional dos Seringueiros- CNS
Verônica Telma da Rocha Passos
Universidade Federal do Acre-UFAC
Vicenzo Maria Lauriola
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
Victor Paulo de Oliveira
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Willem Jeths
Instituto Peabiru
Table 11.8.3 – List of Participants of the third Regional Workshop on the Amazon Biome, held in Manaus/AM, from
December 6 to 7, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Adelson da Silva Saldanha
Conselho Indígena do Vale do Javari-CIVAJA
Adriano Jerozolimski
Conservation Internacional CI/PROJETO KAYAPÓ
Ak' Jabor Kaiapó
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB e
Comissão Nacional de Políticas Indigenistas no Plano Nacional de Áreas
Protegidas-PNAP
Aldamir Sateré
Fundação Estadual dos Povos Indigenas-FEPI
Alicia Rolla
Instituto Socioambiental- ISA
Ana Luisa Mangabeira Albernaz
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - MPEG
Ana Rosa Mesquita de Figueiredo
Cooperação Técnica Alemã- GTZ
Anselmo Cristiano de Oliveira
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/DF
Arnaldo Carneiro Filho
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
Auricélio Batista Brandão
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Clovis Ambrosio
Conselho Indígena de Roraima-CIR
Corina Dessana
Associação Arte e Cultura Indígena do Amazonas-AACIAM
Crisomar Raimundo da Silva Lobato
Secretaria Executiva de Ciência, Tecnologia e Meio Ambiente - SECTAM / PA
162
Dan Pasca
Cooperação Técnica Alemã- GTZ
Daniela de Oliveira e Silva
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Darcy Marubo
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Débora Tan Huare
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Eduardo Ribeiro Felizola
Greentec Consultoria e Planejamento Agro-Florestal e do Meio Ambiente
Fernanda Carvalho
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Francisco Apurina
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Francisco Javier Fawaz
Greentec Consultoria e Planejamento Agro-Florestal e do Meio Ambiente
Genilson Baik Reis Paixão Tembé
Associação dos Povos Tupi do Pará-AMTAPAMA
Gisele Lopes
Instituto de Pesquisa e Formação em Educação Indígena-IEPÉ
Guinter Kroemer
Conselho Indigenista Missionário-CIMI
Helcio Marcelo de Souza
The Nature Conservancy-TNC
Helena Fany Pantaleoni Ricardo
Instituto Socioambiental- ISA
Hernani Antunes Buciolotti
Fundação Nacional do Índio- FUNAI
Hilton Silva do Nascimento
Centro de Trabalho Indigenista- AM ( Vale do Javari)
Iara Ferraz
Consultant
Ireô Kayapó
Comissão Nacional de Políticas Indigenistas no Plano Nacional de Áreas
Protegidas-PNAP
Isabel Castro
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Israelita Rede Bezerra
Conselho Geral da Tribo Sateré-Mawé-CGTSM
Jackson Nascimento Pereira
Conselho Indígena de Roraima-CIR
João Evangelista Asiwefo Tiriyo
Associação dos Povos Indígenas Tiriyó, Kaxuyana e Txikiyana
APITIKATXI/Amazon Conservation Team-ACT BRASIL
Jonenilson Barbosa Campos
Conselho Indígena dos Rios Tapajós e Arapiuns-CITA
José Eduardo Lozano Badialli
Instituto de Pesquisa Ecológica- IPÊ
Juliana Schietti
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
Juracilda Veiga
Fundação Nacional do Índio- FUNAI
Leonardo Pacheco
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis-IBAMA/AM
Leticia Luiza Yawanawá
Organização de Mulheres Indígenas-SITOAKORE
Lucio Flores
Comissão Nacional de Biodiversidade-CONABIO
Manoel Gomes da Silva
Associação dos Povos Indígenas do Tumucumaque-APITU
Marcelo Gusmão
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Márcia Tagore
Cooperação Técnica Alemã- GTZ
Maria Miquelina Barreto Machado
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Maurice Seiji Tomioka Nilsson
Comissão Pró Yanomami- CCPY
Nujaré Apali Waiana
Associação dos Povos Indígenas do Tumucumaque-APITU
Obadias Batista Garcia
Conselho Geral da Tribo Sateré Mawé-CGTSM
Odair José Alves de Souza
Conselho Indígena dos Rios Tapajós e Arapiuns-CITA
Oyô Kayapó
Comissão Nacional de Políticas Indigenistas no Plano Nacional de Áreas
Protegidas-PNAP
Pablo de Lima Galeão
Cooperação Técnica Alemã- GTZ
Paulino Manuelzinho Nunes
Conselho Geral da Tribo ticuna-CGTT
Raimundo Malverá da Silva
Organização dos Povos Indígenas do Médio Purus-OPIMP
Rejane Andrade
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Rodrigo Thurler Nacif
Fundação Nacional do Índio- FUNAI
Ronaldo Weigand
Ministério do Meio Ambiente-MMA
Sebastião Alves Rodrigues Manchineri
MAPKAHA - Manxineryne Ptohi Kajpaha Hajene-Mapkaha/ Organização do Povo
Manchineri -MAPKAHA
Sylvain Desmoulière
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
Thais Briamesi
RADIOBRAS
Valeria Pereira
Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira- COIAB
Vicenzo Lauriola
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA
163
Pantanal Biome
Table 11.8.4 – List of Participants of the Regional Workshop on the Pantanal Biome, held in Campo Grande/MS, from
November 20 to 23, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Adilson Miguel
Conerq/MS
Adriana Panhol Bayma
MMA/NCP
Ana Elisa F. Bacellar Schittini
IBAMA/DIPRO
Avay Miranda Junior
NCP / MMA
Camilla Velleda Thomaz Bastianon
UnB
Elisa Coutinho de Lima
UnB
Ervanda Timm
Gabriela Rocha Priante Teles de Ávila
SEMA/MT
Geraldo José Lucatelli Dória de Araújo Júnior
ANA
Giovana Bottura
IBAMA/DIPRO
Glória Spezia
SBF/MMA
Guilherme Déstro
IBAMA/DIPRO
Gustavo Oliveira e Silva
MMA
Ivan Salzo
IBAMA-MS
José Geraldo Magela Ângelo
IBAMA
Juliana Bragança Campos
UNB
Marcos da Silva Alves
SBF/MMA
Mauro Oliveira Pires
NCP / MMA
Miguel Jordão
FUNAI
Nelson Amaral Nunan Eustáquio
MMA
Nereu Fontes
IBAMA/GEREX-MS
Nuno Rodrigues da Silva
IBAMA
Paula Hanna Valdujo
NCP / MMA
Paulo Fernando Maier Souza
IBAMA/MT
Regina Lúcia de Alcântara Góes
INCRA
Rozimeiry Gomes Bezerra
INCRA
Sérgio Travassos
Silvia Regina Zacharias
INCRA
Terezinha Martins
MMA/DEA
Abnel Marques Rondon Filho
Admilson Gonçalves de Araújo
Comunidade Ribeirinha Estirão Comprido
Ambrósio da Silva
T.I. Bodoquena – Kadwéo
Ana Isabel Wohlfahrt
Cooperativa dos Pequenos Agricultores de Poconé
Ana Lúcia Barros
André Luiz Siqueira
Ângela Rosa da Silva
Comunidade Ribeirinha de Cuiabá – Mirim
Ângelo Conceição Arruda
Associação Boa Vida – Quilombo Mata Cavalo
Anna Santos
Antenor Augusto da Silva
T.I. Taunay
Antônio Borges dos Santos
Antônio Conceição Paranhos Filho
Arilson Cândido
Aldeia Bananal-Terena
Bernardino Bezerra
Celso Tarcisio Rosso
Cláudio Rodrigues Fabi
Cleide Noêmia Amador de Souza
Clemência B. Donati
Vida Pantaneira
164
Daice Bispo Silva
Comunidade Quilombola Família Bispo
Divaldo da Costa Soares
Comunidade Ribeirinha de Porto da Manga
Edilce Mesnerovicz
Elaine Cristina Teixeira Pinto
CI
Estevão Bororo Taukane
Associação Korogedo Parukegeweu
Expedito D. Lira
Fátima Sonoda
Neotrópica
Glaucia Drummond
Biodiversitas
Hélio Ivase
Ieda Maria Bortolotto
Isidoro Salomão
José Antônio Paravá Ramos
Portal do Encantado
José Catarino de Sousa
José Roberto Camargo de Souza
Liezé Francisco Xavier
Ass. Pescadores de Iscas Artesanal de Miranda
Luiz Benatti
Mara Lúcia Pena de Abreu
Marcia Brambilla
Neotrópica
Marco de Barros Costacurta
Maria Lúcia Rocha Toledo
Marilza Garcia Gomes
Marino Pereira da Silva
Mario Vito Comar
IMAD
Moacir Coguiepa
Associação Tadarimana Tadawuge
Noelina Marques Dias
SEMADES
Otoniel Ricardo Kaiowá
Aldeia Te'ýkue – T.I. Caarapo
Ronaldo Santana Nunes de Souza
Ronaldo Santana Nunes de Souza
Rosane Juraci Bastos Gomes
CEPPEC - Centro de Produção, Pesquisa e Capacitação do Cerrado
Sebastião Correa dos Santos
Solange Gomes dos Santos
Sylvia Torrecilha
Teófilo Mendes da Silva
Comunidade Quilombola Negra Rural Campina de Pedra
Vicente Falcão de Arruda Filho
Wildney Alves de Almeida
Assentamento Terra Solidária
Alessandro Pacheco Nunes
Embrapa
Arnildo Pott
Embrapa
Carlos Alberto Castro
UFMT
Christine Strussmann
UFMT
Dalci Maurício Miranda de Oliveira
UFMT
Fernando Costa Straube
Mülleriana: Sociedade Fritz Müller de Ciências Naturais
Geraldo Alves Damasceno Júnior
UFMS
Guilherme de Miranda Mourão
Embrapa – Pantanal
João dos Santos Vila da Silva
Embrapa
José Sabino
UNIDERP
Myrian de Moura Abdon
INPE
Paulo Robson de Souza
UFMS
Ricardo Luiz Pires Boulhosa
Pro-Carnívoros / WCS
Solange K. Ikeda Castrillon
Unemat
Tereza Cristina Scotto Pagott
UFMS
Ubirazilda Maria Resende
UFMS
Vanda Lúcia Ferreira
UFMS
Walfrido M. Tomas
EMBRAPA Pantanal
165
Luiz Calvo Ramires Júnior
Ramires Reflorestamento Ltda
Cerrado Biome
Table 11.8.5 – List of Participants of the Regional Workshop on the Cerrado Biome, held in Brasília/DF, from November
20 to 23, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Adriana Panhol Bayma
MMA/NCP
Alberto Brito
Comparques-DF
Alfredo da Costa Pereira Júnior
INPE/MCT
Ana Elisa F. Bacellar Schittini
IBAMA/DIPRO
Anselmo Cristiano de Oliveira
Pró-várzea/IBAMA
Antônio Dias Soares
IBAMA-GO
Antônio Fernando de A. Mendes
IBAMA-TO
Arnaldo Ferreira
IBAMA
Avay Miranda Junior
NCP / MMA
Avelar DamascenoAmorim
FASE
Bráulio F. S. Dias
MMA
Camilla Velleda Thomaz Bastianon
UnB
Carlos Eduardo Ribeiro Cândido
Carlos Daniel Gomes Toni
IBAMA -SP
Crizanto Brito de Carvalho
CGZAM / IBAMA
Débora Leite Silvano
NCP / MMA
Edite Mesquita dos Santos Carvalho
IBAMA-GO
Elton Antônio Silveira
SEMA/MT
Francisca Helena Muniz
UEMA
Francisco José Barbosa de Oliveira Filho
IBAMA/DIPRO
Giovana Bottura
IBAMA/DIPRO
Glória Spezia
SBF/MMA
Guilherme Déstro
IBAMA/DIPRO
Gustavo Henrique de Oliveira
IBAMA/DISAM
Gustavo Oliveira e Silva
MMA
Hiroyuki Nemoto
IBAMA
Horley Teixeira Luzardo
MMA-GO
Isabel Belloni Schmidt
IBAMA/DIREF
Ivan Salzo
IBAMA-MS
Jailton Dias
IBAMA/DIPRO
José Ricardo M. V. Abreu
Comparques-DF
Judson Barros Pereira
FUNÁGUAS - PI
Juliana Bragança Campos
UNB
Júlio Cesar de Sá da Rocha
IBAMA/GEREX-BA
Laerte Guimarães Ferreira Júnior
UFG/LAPIG
Lúcia de Fátima Lima
IBAMA
Manoel Araújo
IBAMA-DF
Marcelo Lima Reis
IBAMA/DIFAP
Marcos Antônio Pinto
IAP-PR
Marcos da Silva Alves
SBF/MMA
Marcos Reis Rosa
NAPMA / MMA
Maria Helena Reinhardt
IBAMA-DF
Marissônia Lopes de Almeida
SEPLAN-TO
Mauro Oliveira Pires
NCP / MMA
Mônica de Faria Franco Negrão
DPG/MMA
166
Nilva Claro Costa
SEMARH-DF
Paula Hanna Valdujo
NCP / MMA
Paulo Kageyama
MMA
Raul Luis de
Comparques-DF
Ricardo Campos da Nóbrega
IBAMA
Roberto Messias Franco
IBAMA/GEREX-MG
Romildo Macedo Mafra
IBAMA/GEREX-PI
Sergio Henrique Colaço de Carvalho
IBAMA/DIREC
Simone Gonçalves Machado Lacerda
IBAMA
Vicente José Puhl
FASE - Federação de órgãos Assistência Social e Educacional
William Sousa de Paula
Zenildo Eduardo Correia Soares
IBAMA-BA
Alberto Hapyhi Krahô
Arlete Bandeira
Aldeia São José - Krikati
Boaventura Belizário
Aldeia Governador - Gavião
Dílson Duarte Riquelme
Liderança Guarani/Kaiwá
Hiparidi Top Tiro
Ivan Pol-Cate Canela
Jonas Polino Sansão
Wyty-Cate
Sara Gaia
Wyty-Cate
Adolpho Luiz B. Kesselring
FUNATURA
Ana Caldeira de Barros
Rede Ita-Rede Intercâmbio De Tecnologias Alternativas
Andréia Bavaresco
CTI
Benito Fernandez Mera
BIOESTE
Cássio Soares Martins
Biodiversitas
César Victor Espírito Santo
Funatura / Rede Cerrado
Clarisse Guerra
CENEC
Campo Valle-Centro de Assessoria aos Movimentos Populares do Vale do
Jequetinhonha
CI
Conceição Aparecida Luciano
Cristiano de Campos Nogueira
Edite Lopes de Souza
10envolvimento Agência
Eliana Kelly Pareja
Instituto Ecológica
Fátima P. A. Oliveira
Flávio Pereira Diniz
IBRACE-Instituto Brasil Central
Francisco Cordeiro Barbosa
Brejo dos Crioulos
Frei Rodrigo de Castro Amédéc Péret
AFES - Associação Franciscana de Ecologia e Solidariedade
Gabriel Coutinho de Araújo
Assoc. Peq. Agricultores S. José e Região
Genival Araújo Rodrigues
Ivone Riquelme
IPCP-nstituto de Permacultura Cerrado e Pantanal
Izabel Francisco Maia
Joaquim Alves de Sousa
Assoc. Kalunga Cavalcante
CONAQ-Coordenação Nacional de Articulação das Comunidades Negras
Rurais Quilombolas
CENTRU - Centro de Educ. e Cultura do Trabalhador Rural
José Oliveira da Silva
APR-Animação Pastoral e Social no Meio Rural
Jhonny Martins de Jesus
Júlio Falcomer
Lindonésia Luíz de Andrade
IPJP - Instituto Padre João Peter
Lívia Vanucci Lins
ITB - Instituto Terra Brasilis
Lucely Morais Pio
Articulação Pacari
Maria Querubina da Silva Neta
MIQCB-Movimento Interestadual das Quebradeiras de Coco Babaçu
Manoel Conceição Santos
CENTRU - Centro de Educ. e Cultura do Trabalhador Rural
Márcio Antônio Sousa da Rocha Freitas
Maria Dalce Ricas
AMDA-Assoc. Mineira de Defesa do Meio Ambiente
Mario Barroso Ramos-Neto
CI
167
Mozart Júnior Brito Macedo
Neri dos Santos Rosa
Associação Kalunga
Rafael Luis Fonseca
CI
Renato Alves Moreira
Oreades
Rosane Juraci Bastos Gomes
CEPPEC - Centro de Produção, Pesquisa e Capacitação do Cerrado
Sérgio Lisboa Oliveira
Sônia A. Zoago Kamaero
Assoc. Indígena Hailitinã
Stuart Alan Klorfine
Fundação Biologia da conservação
Alexandre Uhlmann
UFPR
Ana Paula Carmignotto
USP-São Carlos
Anderson Cassio Sevilha
EMBRAPA/CENARGEN
Bruno Machado Teles Walter
EMBRAPA/CENARGEN
Carolyn Elinore Barnes Proença
UnB
Dalci Maurício Miranda de Oliveira
UFMT
Elienê Pontes de Araújo
UEMA
Elisa Coutinho de Lima
UnB
Fabiana de Góis Aquino
EMBRAPA/CPAC
Francisco de Arruda Machado
UFMT
Gislaine Disconzi
CNAA
Helga Correa Wiederhecker
Embrapa - Cenergen
Jamilo Thomé Filho
CPRM
João Roberto Correia
Embrapa CPAC
Larissa Nascimento Barreto
UFMA
Leandro Gonçalves Oliveira
UFG
Lúcio Flavo Marini Adorno
UFTO
Ludmilla Maria de SouzaAguiar
EMBRAPA/CPAC
Magno Vicente Segalla
Instituto Horus
Manuel Eduardo Ferreira
UFG/LAPIG
Marcio R. C. Martins
USP
Maria Aparecida da Silva
IBGE-DF
Mariana Napolitano e Ferreira
Neatus/UFT
Paulo Takeo Sano
USP
Renato Torres Pinheiro
UFTO
Roseli Senna Ganen
UnB/CDS
Sueli Matiko Sano
EMBRAPA-CPAC
Tarcísio da Silva Santos Jr
UFMT
Vânia Regina Pivello
USP
Elisa Romano Dezolt
CNI
Evandro Coral Morales
FAMATO/CNA
João de Carli
CNA
Lázaro Eurípedes Xavier
CNA
Léo Lince do Carmo Almeida
CNA
Caatinga Biome
Table 11.8.6 – List of Participants of the Regional Workshop on the Caatinga Biome, held in Fortaleza/CE, from December
13 to 16, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Adeodato Ari Cavalcante Salviano
Universidade Federal do Piauí
Alberto Jorge da Rocha Silva
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Alcioli Galdino dos Santos Júnior
APNE
Alexandre Clistenes de Alcantara Santos
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
168
Ana Elisa de Faria Bacellar Schittini
IBAMA
Ana Maria Giulietti Harley
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
Angela Maria Zanata
Universidade Federal da Bahia
Anselmo Cristiano de Oliveira
IBAMA
Antônia Cristina R. Torres
Associação Indígena Cariri
Antonio Alberto Jorge Farias Castro
Universidade Federal do Piauí
Antônio de Aquino Barros
MONAP
Antônio Edson Guimarães Farias
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Antônio Soares Farias
Arnóbio Cavalcante
Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Arthur Lima da Silva
AGENDHA
Bérites Carmo Cabral
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Bráulio de Sousa Dias
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Caren Cristina Dalmolin
IBAMA
Carlos Antonio Moura Fé
IBAMA
Carlos Henrique Madeiros Castelletti
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Célia da Silva Pereira
IBAMA
Célia Maria Lima de Vasconcelos
BNB
Christiane Izumu Yamamoto
Universidade de Sâo Paulo
Ciro Ginez Albano
AQUASIS
Claudenilson Mendes Ribeiro
Grupo de Interesse Ambiental
Claudia Bueno de Campos
IBAMA
Claudia Luizon Dias Leme
Universidade Federal da Bahia
Clemens Schlindwein
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Cristina A. Gonçalves Rodrigues
EMBRAPA
Cristina Aparecida Gonçalves Rodrigues
EMBRAPA
Daniel Cassiano Lima
UECE
Danielle Blanc
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Diana Levacov
IBAMA
Diana Odete Moura Nogueira
Secretaria da Ouvidoria-Geral e do Meio Ambiente
Diógenes Almeida Segundo
Diva Maria Borges-Nojosa
Universidade Federal do Ceará
Djalma Lima Paiva Filho
IBAMA
Ednaldo Vieira do Nascimento
Rede de ONG da Mata Atlântica
Edneida Rabêlo Cavalcanti
Fundação Joaquim Nabuco
Elizabete Lemos de Carvalho
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Elizete de Oliveira Santos
Grupo de Interesse Ambiental
Evandro Wagner Ferreira Lopes
INCRA-RN
Fábio Pedro Souza De Ferreira Bandeira
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
Fani Mamede
MDA
Flora Acuna Juncá
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
Francisca Soares de Araújo
Universidade Federal do Ceará
Francisco das Chagas Araújo
Associação Indígena Cariri
Francisco Kelvio Campos Costa
Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Gerardo Facundo de Souza Neto
Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Gildácio Sebastião da Silva
IBAMA
Giovana Bottura
IBAMA
Glauco Kimura de Freitas
TNC
Grasiely de Oliveira Costa Tavares
IBAMA
Guilherme Fernando Gomes Destro
IBAMA
Gustavo Henrique Macedo Rocha
Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Hélio Jorge da Cunha
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
169
Iêdo Bezerra Sá
EMBRAPA
Igor Joventino Roberto
AQUASIS
Jailton Dias
IBAMA
João Alberto Gominho Marques de Sá
CPRH/PE
João Arnaldo de Brito
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário
José Airton Passos
Grupo de Interesse Ambiental
José Alberto de Lima Ribeiro
MONAPE
José Alves de Siqueira Filho
Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco
José Luís Passos Cordeiro
FIOCRUZ
José Luis Vieira da Cruz Filho
Associação Plantas do Nordeste
Juliana Farias Forte
Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Karina de Oliveira Teixeira Sales
SEMACE
Leonel Graça Generoso Pereira
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Lubélia Lima da Silva
Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Lucia Maria Bezerra da Silva
ASSUMA
Luciana Maciel Barbosa
Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Luciano José de Oliveira Accioly
EMBRAPA
Luciene Marilac
GEF Caatinga
Luís Fernando Pascholati Gusmão
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
Manuella Andrade de Souza
IBAMA
Marcela Saldanha
Associação Caatinga
Marcela Saldanha de Lima Ferreira
Associação Caatinga
Marcelo Felgueiras Napoli
Universidade Federal da Bahia
Márcia Maria Correa Rêgo
Universidade Federal do Maranhão
Marco Antonio Amaral Passos
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
Marco Antônio Vidal dos Santos Pinto
IBAMA
Marcos Rosa
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Maria Angélica Figueiredo
Universidade Federal do Ceará
Maria Aparecida José de Oliveira
Universidade Federal da Bahia
Maria Aparecida Mendes Silva
Associação Quilombola de Conceição das Crioulas
Maria Arlene Pessoa da Silva
Universidade Regional do Cariri
Maria da Penha E. de Barros
MMA
Maria do Socorro F. Azevedo
Secretaria da Ouvidoria-Geral e do Meio Ambiente
Maria Lenise Silva Guedes
Universidade Federal da Bahia
Maria Luzia Sidonio
Federação Quilombola Mineira
Maria Tereza Bezerra Farias Sales
Secretaria da Ouvidoria Geral e do Meio Ambiente/CE
Maria Valdenete Pinheiro Nogueira
CODEVASF
Mariângela de Araújo Póvoas Pereira
Associação Brasileira das Instituições de Pesquisa Tecnológica
Marina Landeiro
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Marjorie Cseko Nolasco
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
Milcíades Gadelha de Lima
Secretaria de Meio Ambiente e Recursos Naturais/CE
Miller Holanda Câmara
IBAMA
Mônica Farias Maia
BNB
Mônica Maria Bezerra Farias
Banco do Nordeste
Núbia Cristina Silva Stella
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Odilo Neto Luna Coelho
INCRA
Patricia Maia Correira de Albuquerque
Universidade Federal do Maranhão
Paulo Garcia
Permacultura - Bahia
Paulo Magno Gabeto Martinez
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Pedro Cerqueira Lima
CETREL
Raimundo Jeová Rodrigues Alves Filho
Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Raimundo Jeremias de Souza
Central das Associações de Fundo e Fecho de Pasto
170
Raquel Caroline Alves Lacerda
IBAMA
Ricardo Araújo
IBAMA
Rita de Cássia Surrage de Medeiros
IBAMA
Rodrigo Castro
Associação Caatinga
Rodrigo Martins dos Santos
Associação Indígena Cariri
Rogério Azevedo
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Rosany Braga Pegado
Associação Quilombola
Rosiane Maria Bezerra
GEF Caatinga
Rosimary de Araujo
Associação Indígena Cariri
Rosimere Ana Bezerra
GEF Caatinga
Rubens Ramos Mendonça
IBAMA
Sergio Ricardo Travassos da Rosa
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Shirley Hauff
TNC
Sonia Regina Silva Portugal
Centro de Recursos Ambientais/BA
Teresa Alves Rodrigues Cariri
Associação Indígena Cariri
Thieres Pinto
AQUASIS
Victa Nobre de Andrade
Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Viviane Mazim
Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Washington de Jesus Santanna da Franca Rocha
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
Weber Andrade de Girão e Silva
AQUASIS
Wellington de Santana
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente de Sergipe
Yara de Melo Barros
IBAMA
Atlantic Forest Biome
Table 11.8.7 – List of Participants of the first Regional Workshop on the Atlantic Forest Biome, held in Florianópolis/SC,
from November 7 to 9, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Alair de Souza
FATMA
Alexandre Krob
CURICACA
Alvaro Peres de Magalhães
MINC
Anita B. Diederichsen
TNC
Augusto Barbosa Coura Neto
IBGE
Beloni T. Pauli
FATMA
Carlos A. Cassini
FATMA
Carlos Henrique S. de Oliveira
MMA
Carolina Alves Lemos
ONG AÇÃO NASCENTE MAQUINE-ANAMA
Carolina R. Cury Müller
GEEP-AÇUNGUI
Ciro Carlos Mello Couto
RPPN CATARINENSE
Daniel de Barcellos Falkenberg
UFSC- BOT
Elaine Lucas Gonsales
ACAPRENA
Elza Nishimura
INST.RÂ-BUGIO
Evanilde Benedito
UEM
Fabiano Grecio de Carvalho
DUNAS-ONG
Gilberto Campello Brasil
MMA
Gustavo Romeiro Mainardes Pinto
IBAMA
Jan Karel F. Mähuer Jr
ONG CURICACA
João Batista Campos
IAP/DIBP
João de Deus Medeiros
UFSC
Jorge Ram
REDE A NJOS DAS ÁGUAS
Jon Ruis Andrade
AGEFLOR
Julio Oracio Felipe
ACR
171
Kazue K. Kita
UEM
Lauro Eduardo Bacca
CERBMA
Lisiane Becker
ONG PROJ. MIRA-SERRA
Luis Fernando Stumpf
ARAÇA-PIRANGA
Luis R. de M. Baptista
UFRGS
Luiz Fernando Barros
MMA
Magno Vicente Segalla
Mater natura
Marcilio Caron Neto
CNI
Marco Brito
ACR
Marcos Da-Ré
SOCIO AMBIENTAL CONS. ASSOC.
Maria Cristina Bartolou
ONG/OSCIP ANJOS DO TEMPO
Maria Salete Carbonera
SEMA/DEFAP
Marina Landeiro
MMA
Mauricio F. Graipel
UFSC
Miriam Prochnow
APREMAUI
Mônica Gomes
CAIPOR/PAU CAMP
Nery Prux
ONG/OSCIP ANJOS DO TEMPO
Patricia Maria Sociani
FATMA
Patricia Zeni de Sá
F.PRA VER NATUREZA
Paulo Roberto Castella
SEMA
Pedro Develey
BIRDLIFE/SAVE
Ricardo Miranda de Brito
SPVS
Roberta Alencar
MMA
Rudi Ricardo Lopes
FURB
Rui José de F. dos Santos
AGAPAN
Sofia Campiolo
MMA
Telma de Castro
MMA
Ulisses R. de Andrade
FIESC
Vandir Francisco Zancan
AGEFLOR
Vinicius Paiva Gonsalves
SOCIO AMBIENTAL CONS. ASSOC.
Vitor de Q. Piacentini
SBO
Wigold B. Schaffer
NAPMA/SBF
Table 11.8.8 – List of Participants of the second Regional Workshop on the Atlantic Forest Biome and second Regional
Workshop on the Coastal and Marine Zone, held in Rio de Janeiro/RJ, from November 21 to 23, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Adriana Paese
Conservação Internacional
Adriano P. Paglia
Conservação Internacional
Agnaldo da Silva Martins
UFES
Alba Simon
Instituto Baia de Guanabara
Alexandre Krob
Curicaca
Alexandre Lantelme Kirovsky
SEAP
Alexandre Souza
IBAMA/RJ
Alexandre Turra
IO/USP
Ana Carolina C.S.T. Maia
IEE/RJ
Ana Lídia de Araújo
NZCM/SBF/MMA
Ana Maria de Godoy Teixeira
Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado
Ana Paula Leite Prates
Coordenadora NZCM/SBF/MMA
André Almeida Cunha
UFMG
André L. Miragaia Mendes
Vale Verde
André Lima Torres
Petrobras
Anidio Correa
Petrobras
Antonio de Padua Q. Cordeiro
INCRA/RJ
172
Antonio M. Pedroso Jr
OPTA
Benedito Alves da Silva
Quilombo
Berites do Carmo Cabral
NZCM/MMA
Bonfilio Alves Ferreira
USP
Carla pena Osório
CECLIMAR/UFRGS
Carlos A..da Silva Souza
INCRA/RJ
Carlos Alberto Borzone
CEM/UFPR
Carlos eduardo de Viveiros Grelle
UFRJ
Carlos Eduardo Leite Ferreira
UFF
Carlos Henrique Martins
Soc. Macaé Cima
Carmen Lúcia D.B.R. Wongtschowski
USP
Carolina Born Toffoli
ISA
Célia Cymbalista
SOS Rep. Guarapiranga
Célio Roberto Jonck
CENPES/Petrobras
Celso Azevedo
UFES
Cesar Meyer Musso
Avidepa
Claudio Nicoletti de Fraga
JBRJ
Cristina Orpheo
Vita Civilis
Cristina W. Vieira
ARPEMG
Cyl Farney Catarino de Sá
JBRJ
Daniel Wiechers
NZCM/SBF/MMA
Daniela Nicioli Estevam da Silva
IEMA/ES
Daniele Blanc
NZCM/SBF/MMA
Débora de Oliveira Pires
Museu Nacional/UFRJ
Dora H. de Negreiros
Instituto Baia de Guanabara
Edson Valpassos
RMA/AAPFg
Euvira Rose Atuati
Instituto Águas da Prata
Fábio Brant
ANP
Fani Mamede
MDA
Felipe Martins Mello
MMA
Gilberto Lamoglia
CNI/FIRJAN
Glaucia Moreira Drummond
Fundação Biodiversitas
Guarani de Holanda Cavalcanti
Petrobras
Gustavo M. Accacio
WWF
Helena Godoy Bergallo
UERJ/Ibiomas
Hélio Jorge da Cunha
DCBIO/MMA
Henrique Ilha
IBAMA
João Carlos Thome
Tamar/IBAMA
João Emidio Lima da Silva
ARPEMG
João Luis Nicolodi
GERCOM/SQA/MMA
Jocimar Mendonça
Instituto de Pesca de São Paulo
Juliana O. Rego
FZB/RJ
Katia Marcia Pacheco
ISA
Lailah G. Aburachid
Ouarte
Leandro Batili
Votorantim Celulose e Papel
Leandro C.da silva
ANP
Leonardo Rubi Rörig
UNIVALI
Leonardo V. Mohr
IBAMA
Leonor Ribas de Andrade
CGPEG/IBAMA
Lina Maria Ache
SMA/CETESB
Lúcia Gaudêncio
CMA/SPP/ANP
Luis Henrique de Lima
Consultant, NZCM/SBF/MMA
173
Luiz Claudio Ribeiro
UFES
Luiz Fernando R. Barros
NAPMA/SBF/MMA
Luiz Otávio Frota
DIFAP/IBAMA
Lupércio Araújo Barbosa
Instituto Orca
Marcelo Antonio Amaro Pinheiro
UNESP/Campus Litoral Paulista
Marcelo Simonelli
IPEMA
Márcia Engel
Instituto Baleia Jubarte
Márcia Hirota
SOS Mata Atlântica
Márcia Rieder
SEMA/RS
Marcos L. de Almeida
Marinha do Brasil
Marcos Yamamoto
Votorantim Celulose e Papel
Maria Carolina Hazin
NZCM/SBF/MMA
Maria Patricia Corbelo Fernandez
CENPES/Petrobras
Marilda Cruz Lima da Silva
RMA
Marina Landeiro
DCBIO/SBF/MMA
Marinez Scherer
Inst. Amb. Ratones
Marta Braconi
SOS Rep. Guarapiranga
Marta Emerich
SMA/CETESB
Marussia Whately
ISA
Maurício Leme da Fonseca
Petrobras
Moacir Apolinário
Petrobras
Mônica Brick Peres
CEPERG/IBAMA
Norberto Olmiro Horn Filho
UFSC
Otávio Augusto Vuolo Marques
Butantan
Patricia Luciano Mancini
Projeto Albatroz
Patrícia Teresa Monteiro Cunningham
IO/USP
Paulo César Silva da Motta
IBAMA/RJ
Paulo R. A. Recio
INCRA/RJ
Paulo Roberto Castella
SEMA/PR
Pilar Machado da Cunha
ISA
Raquel Barreto
CSR/IBAMA
Renato Almeida
USP/Bioma
Renato David Ghisolfi
UFES
Renato Jesus
UFV
Ricardo Aranha Ramos
FZB
Ricardo Baitelli
UFRGS
Ricardo Krul
UFPR
Roberto Campos Villaça
UFF
Rodrigo Agostinho
Vidágua
Rogério H. Vereza de Azevedo
DAP/SBF/MMA
Rosa Mancini
CTCOST/CBH-LN
Rosemeri Carvalho Marenzi
UNIVALI
Sandra Flores
Consultant, NZCM/SBF/MMA
Sandro Klippel
IBAMA/RS
Simone Machado
UFES
Solange Irene de Arruda
CENPES/Petrobras
Telma Stephan
ISA
Vivyanne G. de Melo
INCRA
Wigold R. Schaffer
Coordinator, NAPMA/SBF/MMA
Yara Schaeffer Novelli
IO/USP
Table 11.8.9 – List of Participants of the third Regional Workshop on the Atlantic Forest, and third Regional Workshop on
the Coastal and Marine Zone, held in Salvador/BA, from December 5 to 7, 2006.
174
NAME
INSTITUTION
Adelma Cristovam dos Passos
Alberto Campos
AQUASIS
Alexandre Lantelme Kirovsky
SEAP
Alvaro Magalhães
Ministério da Cultura
Ana Lídia de Araújo Ramos
CSR/IBAMA
Andrei Langeloh Roos
CEMAVE/IBAMA
Ângela Zanata
UFBA
Antonio da Silva Franco Filho
CIRM
AroldoSouza Andrade
SEAP/BA
Augusto César Coelho D. Silva
TAMAR/IBAMA
Ayda Vera Alcântara
UFS – Departamento de biologia, Núcleo de Ecossistemas Costeiros
Beatrice Padovani Ferreira
UFPE
Benedito Roque da Costa
MONAPE
Bruno Almeida Cabral
APA Piaçabuçu
Carla de Barros A. Hastinet
UFBA
Carla Menegola
UFBA
Catharine Prost
UFBA
Cícero Medeiros Lima
Colonia Pescadores
Claudia Sampaio
Claudio Dellini
TAMAR/IBAMA
Clemente Coelho Junior
Projeto Recife-Olinda; PROMANG
Clóvis Barreira Castro
UFRJ
Daniel Wiechers
MMA
Diva Maria Borjes Nojosa
UFC
Eneida Maria Eskinazi Sant'Anna
UFRN, Centro de Biociências, Depto de Oceanografia e Limnologia.
Enrico Marcovaldi
Instituto Baleia Jubarte
Erminda G. Couto
UESC
Fábio Brante
SSP/CMA
Fani Mamede
MDA
Fernando Acioli
APA Costa dos Corais
Francisco Rodrigues Soares
Fundação Rio Paraiba
Francoly Thiago Reis
MMA/DCBIO
Gecely Rodrigues Alves Rocha
UESC, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas.
George Emmanuel Cavalcanti de Miranda
UFPB, Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza
George Olavo Mattos e Silva
UEFS, Departamento de Ciências Biológica
Giovanna Carrozzo
Petrobras
Guilherme Dutra
Conservação Internacional
Gustave Lopez
Tamar
Guy Marcovaldi
Tamar
Helena Mathews-Cascon
UFC
Hélio Jorge da Cunha
MMA/DCBIO
Jaqueline Mariano
ANP
João Carlos Thomé
TAMAR/IBAMA
João Luís F. Ferreira
MMA/SBF/NZCM
Josias Clementino de Jesus
MONAPE
Liana de Figueiredo Mendes
UFRN, Centro de Biociências
Livia de Laia Loiola
MMA/SBF/NZCM
Lívia Karina Passos Martins
IBAMA
Luciano de Faria Azevedo
Luisa Juliana Lopes
CNM/IBAMA
Márcia de França Rocha
Petrobras
175
Marcos L. de Almeida
Marinha do Brasil
Margareth Maia
CRA(SIG)
Maria Ap. J. Olivio
UFBA
Superintendencia de Administração do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Estado da
Ciência e Tecnologia e do Meio Ambiente
UFS – Departamento de biologia, Núcleo de Ecossistemas Costeiros
Maria Betania Matos de Carvalho
Myrna Friederichs Landin de Souza
Patrícia Elizabeth Rizzi
Paulo Antunes Horta Junior
Paulo Travassos
Pedro Augusto Macedo Lins
IBAMA/DIREC
UFPB, Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza - Departamento de
Sistemática e Ecologia
UFRPE, Departamenro de Pesca e Aquicultura, Laboratõrio de Ecologia
Marinha Lemar.
IBAMA
Raquel Barreto
IBAMA/CSR
Renata Lúcia Batista
Instituto de de Pesquisa e Conservação de Mamíferos Aquáticos
Ricardo Farias do Amaral
UFRN, Centro de Ciências Exatas, Departamento de Geologia.
Ricardo Zaluar
Petrobras
Roberto Sforza
Projeto TAMAR - Coordenação Nacional
Rodrigo de Salles
UFC/ Dep. de Pesca - Instituto de Ciências do Mar
Rogério H. Vereza de Azevedo
DAP/MMA
Sandra Flores Nunes
Consultant, MMA/SBF/NZCM
Sérgio Cipolotti
Instituto Baleia Jubarte
Thales Ushizima
CEPENE/IBAMA
Tito Monteiro da Cruz Lotufo
UFC, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Departamento de Engenharia de Pesca.
Pampas Biome
Table 11.8.10 – List of Participants of the Regional Workshop on the Pampas Biome, held in Porto Alegre/RS, from
October 30 to November 1, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Alexandre Krob
CURICACA
Alvaro Pontes de Magalhães Junior
Ministério da Cultura
Ana de Araújo Carrion
UFRGS
Ana Elisa F. Bacellar Schittini
IBAMA
Anders Tosterno
STORA ENSO
André Rocha Ferretti
Fundação O Boticário
Carla Suertegaray Fontana
PUC/RS
Carlos G. Tonrquist
Fundação GAIA
Carlos Henrique Jung Dias
IBAMA
Caroline Lorenci Mallman
FEPAM/UFSM
Cecília Volkmen Ribeiro
Museu de Ciências Naturais
César Augusto dos Reis
ABRAF
Cezar Augusto Carneiro
Correios
Chris Molvorcem
Consultant, MMA
Cibele Indrusiak
IBAMA
Cíntia Barenho
CEA
Coralia M. O. Medeiros
FEPAGRO
Cristiano Aura
UFRGS
Daniel Souza Castro
UFRGS
Eduardo Osório Stumpf
Aracruz Celulose S.A.
Eduino de Mattos
Rede Bioma Pampa
Erick Mello Maciel
Instituto Patulus
Eridiane Lopes da Silva
IBAMA
Fabrício Barreto
MMA
Fernando Adauto de Souza
FARSUL
176
Fernando Falcão
IBAMA
Fernando Genivan Becker
UFRGS
Giseli Pereira Rubert
INCRA
Helena P. Romanowski
UFRGS
Henrich Hasenack
UFRGS
Ian Karel Felix Mähler Jr.
ONG Curicaca
Ilsi Iob boldrini
UFRGS
Itamar Pelizzaro
CLA Comunicações
Ivo Lessa
FARSUL
Ivonete Carvalho
SEPPIR/PR
Jan karel Felix Mähler Junior
CURICACA
Jefferson Roberto Bahnert Santos
João Mielniczok
UFRGS
João Paulo Schneider da Silva
Sindicato Rural Uruguaiana
José Lauro
FIERGS
José Luis Passos
UFRGS
José Luiz de Moraes Mattos
Grupo Ecológico SOS Jacuí
Juan A. Anza
UFRGS
Kátia Regina Aurich
IBAMA
Lair A. B. Ferreira
AGEFLOR
Lair Ângelo Baum
AGEFLOR
Luciana Picoli
Núcleo Amigos da Terra
Luciana Raquel Picoli
Núcleo Amigos da Terra
Luisa Chomenko
Fundação Zoobotânica
Luiz Henrique Pacheco Correa
Prefeitura de Bagé
Luiza Chomenko
MCN/RZB
Marcelo Almeida Bastos
INCRA/RS
Marcelo Machado Madeira
IBAMA
Márcia Quadrado
MDA
Marcílio Caron Neto
CNI
Marcos Rosa
MMA
Maria Luiza Porto
UFRGS
Marília Portugal
IBAMA/SUPES-RS
Marina Landeiro
MMA
Marta Levien
Instituto de Planejamento e Estudos Sócio Ambientais
Maurício Vieira de Sousa
IBAMA
Mauro Müller
Mov. Roessler para defesa ambiental
Miguel Von Behr
IBAMA/ASCON
Miriam Löw
AGAPAN
Nely Blauth
Núcleo Amigos da Terra
Paulo Brach
UFRGS
Paulo Eduardo Mascarenhas Linhares
Associação dos Arrozeiros Uruguaiana
Pedro Develey
Birdlife/Save Brasil
Pedro Furtado
IBGE
Rafael Antunes Dias
Univ. Católica de Pelotas
Regis Wellansen Dias
CREA/RS
Ricardo Brochado Alves da Silva
MMA
Roberto Botia
UFRGS
Rodrigo Pereira Luz de Quadros
AGEFLOR
Salete Beatriz Ferreira
SEMA/DEFAP
Sandra Cristina Müller
UFRGS
Sofia Campiolo
MMA
177
Valério Pillar
UFRGS
Wigold Schaffer
MMA
Coastal and Marine Zone
Table 11.8.11 – List of Participants of the first Regional Workshop on the Coastal and Marine Zone, held in Belém/PA,
from November 6 to 8, 2006.
NAME
INSTITUTION
Áderson Araújo Avelar
SIPAM
Admilson Moreira Torres
SETEC – AP
Adriana de Aviz
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
Adriana Figueiredo Fonseca
CEPNOR/IBAMA
Alexandre Cordeiro
CNPT/IBAMA
Alexandre Lantelme Kirovsky
SEAP
Amilcar Carvalho Mendes
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
Ana Barbosa
CPP
Ana Lídia Araújo
IBAMA/CSR
Ana Paula Leite Prates
Coordinator, NZCM/SBF/MMA
Ana Rosa da Rocha Araújo
Consultant
Ana Tereza Lopes
UFMA
Antonio Aquino Barros
CPP/MONAPE
Antonio Augusto Ferreira Rodrigues
UFMA
Antonio Carlos Leal de Castro
UFMA
Antônio Cordeiro Feitosa
UFMA
Antonio Ricaldi
ANP
Benedito Pereira
MONAPE
Brandi de Oliveira Pantoja
INCRA
Bruno de Brito Gueiros Souza
CNPT/IBAMA/MA
Carolina Alvite
CMA/IBAMA/MMA
Célia Regina das Neves
Resex Mãe Grande
Cristina Arzabe
Embrapa
Cristina Senna
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
Daniel de Oliveira Wiechers
MMA
Danielle Blanc
MMA
Eduardo Godoy
DIREC/IBAMA
Elcio Paulo da Rocha
CEPNOR/IBAMA
Elivan Arantes de Souza
CEMAVE/IBAMA
Fátima Sueli Oliveira dos Santos
CCP Norte
Flávia Rebelo Mochel
UFMA
Flavio Cerezo
IBAMA
Francisco de Paula Baptista Neto
SINPESCA
Gisele Gouvêa Parise
SECTAM
Guilherme Santos Júnior
CEPNOR/IBAMA
Hélio Jorge da Cunha
DCBIO/MMA
Hipólito Augusto Escouto Neto
Instituto Ilha do Caju (ICEP)
Inocêncio de Souza Gorayeb
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
Ivanildo Pereira de Pontes
SINPESCA
Joaquim Belo
CNS
Josinete Pereira Lima
CPP/NORTE
Juliana Fukuda
GEREX/IBAMA
Juliana Teofilo Araujo
Guara
Katia Cristina Araújo Silva
CEPNOR/IBAMA
178
Laís de Morais Rego Silva
UFMA
Larrisa Barreto
UFMA
Leonel Graça Generoso Pereira
SBF/MMA
Lido Leibrecht
BTO Amazonas
Lourdes de Fátima Gonçalves Furtado
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
Luis Henrique de Lima
Consultor
Luis Otávio Frota da Rocha
DIFAP/IBAMA
Maâmar el Robrini
UFPA
Magnus Machado Severo
IBAMA/MA
Manoel Imbireba Jr.
SIPAM
Márcio Barragana
IBAMA/MA
Marco A. C. Solimões
IBAMA/PA
Marcos da Silva Cunha
Parque Cabo Orange/IBAMA
Maria da Conceição Santos
ARQBA
Maria Lucia Aires de Mendonça Melo
INCRA/Santarem
Maria Thereza Ribeiro da C. Prost
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
Marineide Pereira de Almeida
CPP/AP
Mario Menezes
Amigos da Terra
Mônica Pinheiro Feitosa
CNPT/IBAMA
Najja Maria dos Santos Guimarães
IBAMA/PA
Nanci Maria Rodrigues da Silva
IBAMA/RO
Nilce Costa
ANP
Nivaldo Piorski
UFMA
Odilon T. de Melo
UFMA
Oneida Freire
Ministério do Turismo
Orlando Assumpção
MMA/DIFLOR
Paula Hanna Valdujo
Consultant
Paulo da Gama Câmara
Museu do Marajó
Paulo Mota Rocha
MONAPE
Paulo Sérgio Altieri dos Santos
Secretaria Executiva Ciência, Tecnologia e Meio Ambiente do Pará
Pedro Chaves Baia Jr.
SECTAM
Pedro Walfir Martins e Souza Filho
UFPA
Raquel Barreto
CSR/IBAMA
Renato Prado dos Santos
MMA
Ricardo Zaluar P. Guimarães
Petrobrás
Roberto Sforza
Tamar/IBAMA
Rosália Furtado
CEPNOR/IBAMA
Rosimeire Lopes da Trindade
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
Sandra Flores Nunes
Consultant
Sérgio Alberto Q. Costa
SIPAM
Suely A. Marques Aguiar
MPEG
Tarcisio A. de Oliveira
Ministério da Defesa/Marinha do Brasil
Valdemar Londres Vergara Filho
CNPT/IBAMA
Victoria Judith Isaac Nahum
UFPA/Centro de Ciências Biológicas
179
11.9. List of Priority Areas by Biome
Amazon Biome
Table 11.9.1 – List of Priority Areas for the Amazon Biome with: area code, size (km2), biological importance (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high, IK –
insufficiently known), urgency for action (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high), main priority action recommended, and main municipality.
Size (km2)
Area code Name
Importance Priority Priority Action
Main Municipality
Am001
Área Chiquetana
2,177 VH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Pontes e Lacerda(MT)
Am002
Pantanal do Rio Barbado
6,498 VH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
Pontes e Lacerda(MT)
Am003
Nascentes Jauru
2,452 H
EH
Recuperation
Pontes e Lacerda(MT)
Am004
Cabaçal
4,189 VH
VH
Creation full protection PA
Cáceres(MT)
Am005
Serra das Nascentes
16,255 EH
VH
Creation full protection PA
Tangará da Serra(MT)
Am006
Guaporé Corridor
692 VH
H
Creation sustainable use PA
Comodoro(MT)
Am007
Cabixi
896 EH
EH
Fostering sustainable use
Comodoro(MT)
Am008
Pimenteiras (RO)
2,387 EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Cerejeiras(RO)
Am009
Rondon-Xingú
7,710 VH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
Paranatinga(MT)
Vale do Guaporé - Nambikwara Corridor
Am011
1,332 VH
H
Creation sustainable use PA
Vilhena(RO)
Am012
Porto Rolim de Moura
1,417 EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Alta Floresta D'Oeste(RO)
Am013
Cabeceiras do Xingú
6,525 VH
EH
Watershed management
Canarana(MT)
Am014
Norte do PE Corumbiara
183 VH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Cerejeiras(RO)
Am015
Limite TI Omerê
1,547 H
EH
Recuperation
Vilhena(RO)
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Am018
Jatobá
2,258 VH
EH
Am019
Alta Floresta
8,223 VH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Am020
Praia Alta
3,104 EH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Am021
Am022
Am023
Rio Arinos
Rio Roosevelt
Entre Rios
11,049 VH
7,898 VH
2,607 VH
VH
EH
VH
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering sustainable use
Am024
São Francisco do Guaporé
1,779 EH
EH
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
São Miguel do Guaporé(RO)
Am025
Am026
Am027
Am028
Suiázinho
Wawy-Marãwatsêde Corridor
Bacia Arraias
Castanheiras
1,402
5,361
8,278
4,203
VH
VH
EH
EH
Fostering sustainable use
Watershed management
Watershed management
Mosaic/Corridor
São Félix do Araguaia(MT)
São Félix do Araguaia(MT)
Marcelândia(MT)
Sinop(MT)
VH
VH
EH
EH
Paranatinga(MT)
Pimenta Bueno(RO)
São Francisco do
Guaporé(RO)
Juara(MT)
Vilhena(RO)
Paranatinga(MT)
180
Am029
Am030
Am031
Am032
Am033
Am034
Am035
Am036
Am037
Am038
Fronteira Trinacional
Mirante da Serra
Afluentes do Juruena
Icuriã
Trairão
Limite Ouro Preto
Assentamento Bom Jaguá
Preguiça Açaizal
Manissaua-Miçu
Serra dos Caiabis
Am039
Rio Iaco
Am040
Am041
Am042
Am043
Am044
Am045
Am046
Am047
Am048
Am049
Am050
Am051
Am052
Am053
Am055
Am056
Am057
Am058
Am059
Am060
Am061
Nova Mamoré - PEGM
Fronteira sudeste do Acre
Linha D
Rio Teles Pires (Norte)
Rio Aripuanã
Rio Espalha
Jarinã
Sul do Parque Estadual do Xingú
Comandante Fontoura
Araguaia
Umirizal
Madeirinha - Roosevelt
Ponta do Abunã
Médio Araguaia
Nascente de Iriri
Caiabi-Juruena Corridor
Am062
Am063
Mojica Nava / FERS Rio Vermelho B
Cristalino
Vista Alegre
Pro Resex Novo Axioma
Três Irmãos / Madeira
Entorno REBIO Nascentes do
Cachimbo sul
Jaru Campos Amazônicos Corridor
869
544
3,321
361
656
593
334
128
5,531
24,669
EH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
H
EH
VH
VH
3,646 H
1,394
5,136
1,303
6,631
1,302
6,021
6,987
1,003
8,472
2,096
4,222
23,155
2,446
2,542
797
11,743
815
521
2,621
4,610
762
EH
EH
H
H
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
H
Recuperation
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Fostering sustainable use
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Watershed management
Creation PA – undefined category
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Watershed management
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Watershed management
Inventory
Watershed management
Brasiléia(AC)
Ouro Preto do Oeste(RO)
Juína(MT)
Sena Madureira(AC)
São Félix do Araguaia(MT)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Marcelândia(MT)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Peixoto de Azevedo(MT)
Alta Floresta(MT)
Sena Madureira(AC)
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
H
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
Planning and regularization
Creation full protection PA
Watershed management
Creation sustainable use PA
Fostering sustainable use
Creation full protection PA
Fostering sustainable use
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Nova Mamoré(RO)
Porto Velho(RO)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Sinop(MT)
Juína(MT)
Rio Branco(AC)
Guarantã do Norte(MT)
Santa Cruz do Xingu(MT)
São Félix do Xingu(PA)
Vila Rica(MT)
Porto Velho(RO)
Ji-Paraná(RO)
Porto Velho(RO)
Santana do Araguaia(PA)
Guarantã do Norte(MT)
Juara(MT)
Porto Velho(RO)
Alta Floresta(MT)
Porto Velho(RO)
Sena Madureira(AC)
Porto Velho(RO)
1,210 EH
EH
Planning and regularization
Altamira(PA)
1,970 EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Machadinho D'Oeste(RO)
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
181
Am064
Am065
Am066
Am067
Am068
Am069
Am070
Nova California
Tabocal Tarauacá
Aripuanã - Juruena
Cujubim
Alto Purus
Ji-Paraná- Roosevelt
Rio Jurupari
2,997
4,271
9,789
702
2,251
4,523
4,568
Am071
Cruzeiro do Vale
Am072
Am073
Am074
Am075
Machadinho do Oeste
RESEX Guariba-Roosevelt
Curralinho
Campos do Puciari
Am076
Jamamadi do Lurdes
Am077
Am078
Am079
Am080
Am081
Am082
Am083
Am084
Am085
Am086
Am087
Am088
Am089
Am090
Am091
Am092
Am093
Am094
Am095
Am096
Am097
P.A.E. Cruzeiro do Vale
Foz do Caiapó
RESEX Toma Cuidado
Base militar Serra do Cachimbo
Jequitibá (APA)
Candeias
Médio Envira
Sepatini-Ituxi
Microbacia do Rio Dezoito
Baixo Rio Machado
Rio Liberdade
Rio Croa
Pro RESEX Ituxi
Acurauá
Paraná dos Mouras
BR-319 sul
Gleba Cuniã
PDS Jamil Jereissat
Médio Araguaia
Havaí
Interfúvio Araguaia-Tocantins
EA
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
Fostering sustainable use
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Watershed management
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Lábrea(AM)
Feijó(AC)
Aripuanã(MT)
Machadinho D'Oeste(RO)
Sena Madureira(AC)
Ji-Paraná(RO)
Feijó(AC)
1,631 VH
H
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Marechal Thaumaturgo(AC)
931
493
4,597
9,729
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
Planning and regularization
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Machadinho D'Oeste(RO)
Aripuanã(MT)
Feijó(AC)
Porto Velho(RO)
363 EH
EH
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Boca do Acre(AM)
914
1,225
6,748
22,143
1,136
1,734
3,657
14,433
2,494
3,312
556
2,258
8,222
2,058
2,500
3,924
1,041
432
19,864
489
13,325
VH
H
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
H
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Planning and regularization
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Fostering sustainable use
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Fostering sustainable use
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Mosaic/Corridor
Porto Walter(AC)
Conceição do Araguaia(PA)
Boca do Acre(AM)
Itaituba(PA)
Candeias do Jamari(RO)
Porto Velho(RO)
Sena Madureira(AC)
Lábrea(AM)
Santana do Araguaia(PA)
Porto Velho(RO)
Cruzeiro do Sul(AC)
Cruzeiro do Sul(AC)
Lábrea(AM)
Tarauacá(AC)
Cruzeiro do Sul(AC)
Porto Velho(RO)
Porto Velho(RO)
Cruzeiro do Sul(AC)
Araguaína(TO)
Mâncio Lima(AC)
Araguaína(TO)
182
Am098
Am099
Am100
Am101
Pro Resex Pauini
Tarauacá-Envira
Rio Japiim
São Salvador (AC)
2,231
4,720
296
634
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
Am102
Pau D´arco
1,778 VH
VH
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Redenção(PA)
Am103
Am104
Campinaranas do Guajará
RESEX Rio Gregório
298 EH
3,465 EH
EH
VH
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Cruzeiro do Sul(AC)
Tarauacá(AC)
Am105
Fronteira Norte TI Nukini
231 VH
VH
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Mâncio Lima(AC)
Am106
Am107
Am108
Am109
Am110
Am111
Am112
Am113
Am114
Am115
Am116
Am117
Am118
Am119
Am120
Am121
Pro RESEX Médio Purus
Bannach
Campinarana
Cabeceira do Javari
Juruá/Ipixuna
Entorno BR-163
Expansion of Flona Balata Tufari
Am122
Am123
Am124
Am125
Am126
Am127
Am128
Am130
Am131
Projetos de assentamento tradicionais
Baixo Araguaia
Pro Resex do Rio Aripuanã
RDS Canotama
Juruá-Eirunepé
Vale do Corda
Várzea Acará Madeira
APA Triunfo do Xingu
Manicoré Aripuanã
Projetos de assentamento de uso
sustentável (PAE/ PDS/ PAF)
Transgarimpeira
Igarapé Triunfo
Pro RESEX do Cuniã
Pro RESEX Alto Sucunduri
Eldorado dos Carajás
Ipixuna Purus Jari
Entorno FLONA Amanã
Alto Maués
8,468
8,024
5,986
1,011
10,362
8,814
2,638
8,810
3,285
4,319
2,431
8,330
2,295
8,874
2,471
23,845
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
IK
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
H
33,565 VH
820
16,817
25,066
3,980
5,063
31,105
3,727
14,445
EH
H
H
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
Fostering sustainable use
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Pauini(AM)
Feijó(AC)
Cruzeiro do Sul(AC)
Mâncio Lima(AC)
Creation full protection PA
Planning and regularization
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Lábrea(AM)
Redenção(PA)
Cruzeiro do Sul(AC)
Guajará(AM)
Cruzeiro do Sul(AC)
Itaituba(PA)
Lábrea(AM)
Manacapuru(AM)
Araguaína(TO)
Manicoré(AM)
Lábrea(AM)
Eirunepé(AM)
Araguaína(TO)
Manicoré(AM)
São Félix do Xingu(PA)
Manicoré(AM)
EH
Fostering sustainable use
Manacapuru(AM)
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
H
VH
H
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Planning and regularization
Itaituba(PA)
Altamira(PA)
Tapauá(AM)
Borba(AM)
Marabá(PA)
Coari(AM)
Itaituba(PA)
Itaituba(PA)
Fisheries planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Fisheries planning and regularization
Creation PA – undefined category.
Fostering sustainable use
Creation PA – undefined category
183
Am133
Am134
Am135
Am136
Am137
Am138
Am140
Am141
Am142
Am143
Am144
Am146
Am147
Am148
Am149
Am150
Am151
Am152
Am153
Am154
Am156
Am157
Am158
Am159
Am160
Am161
Am162
Am163
Am164
Am165
Am166
Am167
Bico do Papagaio
Rio Itacaiunas
Acari Madeira
Expansion of Resex Médio Juruá
São João do Araguaia
Pro RESEX Baixo Sucunduri
Ponta do Bico do Papagaio
Interflúvio Curuça-Javari
Mangabal
Meso Região Imperatriz
Cabeceiras do Rio Tefé
RDS Igapó-açu
Baixo Coari
Itaituba Sul Corridor
Pro RESEX Mamiá
Ararandeua
Lago da Pedra
Buriticupu
Itinga
Baixo Jutaí
Baixo Jandiatuba
Expansion of RDS Piaguçu Purus
Itaituba Norte Corridor
Tucuruí Leste
Pro Resex Caiambé
Centro Novo
Transamazônica
RDS Alcobaça
Baixo Juruá
Ulianópolis
Conexão Pindaré
Baixo Interflúvio Purus Madeira
Am168
Am169
5,805
3,779
18,099
369
7,593
4,623
491
8,080
1,421
20,848
10,458
4,050
8,947
7,802
4,246
3,537
4,273
3,148
5,484
9,789
4,618
2,991
4,763
7,267
3,281
1,405
6,358
360
25,747
5,044
5,730
7,329
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
H
H
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
H
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
H
EH
H
VH
EH
H
VH
H
EH
H
H
VH
EH
EH
H
H
H
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
Pacajá Assurini Tocantins
2,162 EH
VH
Aveiro
2,160 H
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Planning and regularization
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Watershed management
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Fisheries planning and regularization
Environmental education
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Fisheries planning and regularization
Fostering sustainable use
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Planning and regularization
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Fisheries planning and regularization
Mosaic/Corridor
Watershed management
Planning and regularization
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Creation sustainable use PA
Imperatriz(MA)
Marabá(PA)
Itacoatiara(AM)
Carauari(AM)
Marabá(PA)
Borba(AM)
Bom Jesus do Tocantins(PA)
Atalaia do Norte(AM)
Itaituba(PA)
Imperatriz(MA)
Coari(AM)
Manicoré(AM)
Coari(AM)
Itaituba(PA)
Coari(AM)
Rondon do Pará(PA)
Santa Inês(MA)
Santa Luzia(MA)
Açailândia(MA)
Carauari(AM)
São Paulo de Olivença(AM)
Coari(AM)
Itaituba(PA)
Jacundá(PA)
Coari(AM)
Paragominas(PA)
Uruará(PA)
Tucuruí(PA)
Tefé(AM)
Paragominas(PA)
Santa Luzia(MA)
Manacapuru(AM)
Tucuruí(PA)
Itaituba(PA)
184
Am170
Arara do Maia
Am171
Am172
Am173
Am174
Am175
Am176
Expansion of Resex Baixo Juruá
Lago Miuá
Anapú
Várzea do Solimões
Entorno de Tefé
São Paulo de Olivença
Am177
Paraná do Ramos
Am178
Am179
Am180
Am181
AmZc182
Am183
AmZc184
Am185
AmZc186
Am187
Am188
Am189
AmZc190
Am191
Am192
Am193
Am194
Am195
AmZc196
AmZc197
Am198
Nazaré dos Patos
Volta Grande do Xingu
Rio Capim
Santarém/Belterra
APAs Maranhão Corridor
Cavernas da Volta Grande
Leste da Baía de São José
Cachoeira do Aruã
Baixada
Planície do Içá
Várzea Médio Amazonas
Aruã
Ilha dos Caranguejos
Curuatinga
Paragominas
Tabuleiro do Xingu
Nascentes do Carabinani
Planalto Santareno Oeste
Guarapiranga
MA-05
Mocajuba
Manaus - Presidente Figueiredo Itacoatiara
Manguezais e várzeas do Rio Anil
Savanas de Alter do Chão
Turiaçu Corridor
Am199
AmZc200
Am201
AmZc202
265 VH
2,208
1,112
4,621
20,897
4,948
3,110
EH
H
EH
VH
VH
H
IK
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
9,169 EH
EH
5,878
1,637
19,829
8,144
1,258
1,792
8,536
8,648
3,126
7,331
22,196
3,494
484
3,005
3,103
336
2,398
3,695
38
171
7,197
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Watershed management
Senador José Porfírio(PA)
Uarini(AM)
Codajás(AM)
Pacajá(PA)
Manacapuru(AM)
Tefé(AM)
Santo Antônio do Içá(AM)
Itacoatiara(AM)
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
IK
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
H
VH
H
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
H
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Inventory
Planning and regularization
Recuperation
Tucuruí(PA)
Altamira(PA)
Paragominas(PA)
Santarém(PA)
São Luís(MA)
Altamira(PA)
São Luís(MA)
Santarém(PA)
Pinheiro(MA)
Santo Antônio do Içá(AM)
Parintins(AM)
Santarém(PA)
Santa Rita(MA)
Uruará(PA)
Paragominas(PA)
Porto de Moz(PA)
Codajás(AM)
Santarém(PA)
São Luís(MA)
São Luís(MA)
Cametá(PA)
20,073 EH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Manaus(AM)
20 H
274 VH
4,692 H
EH
EH
H
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
São Luís(MA)
Santarém(PA)
Turiaçu(MA)
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
185
AmZc203
Portel
22,477 VH
VH
Am204
Gleba Lago Grande
1,774 H
EH
AmZc205
AmZc206
Am207
Am208
AmZc209
Curupu/Panaquatira
RESEX Baia do Tubarão
Planalto Santareno Leste
Renascer
Lago Quebra Pote
Mosaico do Baixo
Uatumã/Amazonas II
Bacia do Mapari
Várzeas do Médio Amazonas
Tomé-açu
Ilhas do baixo Tocantins
Baixo Tocantins - Limoeiro
Terra Santa
Maracaçumé
P.A. Campos De Pilar
Margem esquerda do Jatapú
Foz do Rio Tocantins
Cachoeira do Piriá
Rio Amazonas
P.A.E. Quilombola Pacoval
Baixo Jatapu
Maraã
P.A. Campos do Popó
Gurupá - Porto de Moz
Sul APA Baixada Maranhense Divisa MA/PA
Açaí do Marajó
Cachoeira - Ponta de Pedras
Acará
P.A. Cruzeirão
Bujarú
P.A. Novo Horizonte
123
1,119
4,292
4,370
1,192
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
5,507 VH
Am210
Am211
Am212
Am213
AmZc214
AmZc215
Am216
Am217
Am218
Am219
AmZc220
Am221
Am222
Am223
Am224
Am226
Am227
AmZc228
AmZc229
AmZc230
AmZc231
AmZc232
Am233
Am234
Am235
Creation sustainable use PA
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Creation PA – undefined category
Portel(PA)
Santarém(PA)
Creation sustainable use PA
Planning and regularization
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
São José de Ribamar(MA)
Icatu(MA)
Santarém(PA)
Prainha(PA)
Santa Helena(MA)
EH
Planning and regularization
Parintins(AM)
IK
VH
VH
IK
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
Fostering sustainable use
Mosaic/Corridor
Planning and regularization
Fostering sustainable use
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Fostering sustainable use
Creation sustainable use PA
Fonte Boa(AM)
Santarém(PA)
Acará(PA)
Cametá(PA)
Abaetetuba(PA)
Oriximiná(PA)
Viseu(PA)
Alenquer(PA)
Urucará(AM)
Abaetetuba(PA)
Bragança(PA)
Santarém(PA)
Alenquer(PA)
Urucará(AM)
Maraã(AM)
Monte Alegre(PA)
Gurupá(PA)
1,082 VH
VH
Recuperation
Viseu(PA)
5,140
586
2,511
448
3,298
111
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Mosaic/Corridor
Planning and regularization
Muaná(PA)
Muaná(PA)
Belém(PA)
Óbidos(PA)
Castanhal(PA)
Alenquer(PA)
8,368
5,086
7,541
1,117
4,467
285
6,846
34
7,482
1,824
4,112
18,081
80
6,689
2,443
3,806
4,153
EH
EH
VH
H
H
H
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Planning and regularization
Creation full protection PA
Fisheries planning and regularization
186
AmZc236
AmZc237
AmZc239
Am240
AmZc241
Am242
AmZc243
AmZc244
Am245
Am246
Am247
AmZc248
AmZc249
AmZc250
AmZc251
AmZc252
AmZc253
AmZc254
AmZc255
AmZc256
Am257
Am258
AmZc259
Am260
AmZc261
AmZc262
AmZc263
AmZc264
AmZc265
Am266
AmZc267
Sistema Foz do Gurupi e Baía de
Turiaçu
Região das Ilhas - Breves
Ilhas de Belém
P.A. Trombetas
Cavernas da Serra do Piriá
Cuminapanema
Mapuá Corridor
PA-24
Quilombos de Salvaterra
Rio Parú
P.A. Quilombo Erepecuru
Expansion of Resex Marinha Arai
Peroba
PA-04
Área Central do Marajó
PA-23
Expansion of Resex Marinha Caeté
Taperaçu
Full Protection of Marajó
Campos alagados de Tracuateua e
Bragança
PA-08
Baias do Iboraí/ Urumajó e do Caeté
Ordenamento Santa Izabel.
Almerim - Arraiolo
Bacia do Arari
RESEX Jauaperi (Baixo Rio Branco
- Jauaperi)
PA-22
Litoral de Salvaterra
Braço sul do arquipélago de Marajó
Vale do Jari
Aramã / Anajás
Chavascais do Médio Rio Negro
Pirabas - Rei Sabá
2,670 EH
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Viseu(PA)
5,605
830
898
421
226
931
1,110
220
1,289
1,500
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
H
VH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
H
Creation full protection PA
Planning and regularization
Environmental education
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Breves(PA)
Belém(PA)
Oriximiná(PA)
Viseu(PA)
Alenquer(PA)
Breves(PA)
Bragança(PA)
Ponta de Pedras(PA)
Almeirim(PA)
Oriximiná(PA)
62 EH
EH
Fisheries planning and regularization
Augusto Corrêa(PA)
6,476 EH
3,245 EH
1,523 H
EH
EH
VH
Fisheries planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Recuperation
Breves(PA)
Breves(PA)
Bragança(PA)
30 VH
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Bragança(PA)
1,376 EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Muaná(PA)
384 EH
EH
3,441
316
12,238
5,626
3,903
H
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
H
6,407 EH
1,925
115
4,104
2,719
1,653
10,101
518
H
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Environmental education
Fisheries planning and regularization
Creation sustainable use PA
Bragança(PA)
Mosaic/Corridor
Belém(PA)
Augusto Corrêa(PA)
Barcelos(AM)
Almeirim(PA)
Muaná(PA)
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Barcelos(AM)
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Salinópolis(PA)
Soure(PA)
Belém(PA)
Almeirim(PA)
Anajás(PA)
Barcelos(AM)
São João de Pirabas(PA)
Fisheries planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Creation PA – undefined category
Fisheries planning and regularization
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
187
AmZc268
Am269
AmZc270
AmZc272
Am273
AmZc274
AmZc275
Maguari Corridor
Arquipélago de Mariuá
Anajás Corridor
P.A.E. da Ilha da Cinza
Centro Novo do Cajari
Mexiana Caviana I
Canal da Tartaruga
AmZc276
Santana / Mazagão
AmZc277
Am278
Am279
Am280
P.A. Maracá
Piquiazal
Calha do rio Branco
P.A.E. Anauerá - Pucu
AmZc281
Macapá / Santana
Am282
Am283
AmZc284
AmZc285
Am286
Am287
Am288
AmZc289
AmZc290
Am292
Am293
Am294
Rio Macucuau
Curudurí- Aracá
Mexiana Caviana II
Am295
Kué-Kué Marabitana
6,987 H
H
Am296
AmZc297
Am298
Am299
AmZc300
Am301
P.A. Nova Canaã
Bacia da Pedreira
Jauaperi
P.A. Munguba
P.A. Itaubal
Pedra Branca (RR)
Highway planning and regularization
BR-174 / BR-210 (south)
204
2,749
1,659
308
134
809
H
H
EH
H
H
H
VH
EH
H
VH
VH
H
Planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Creation sustainable use PA
Planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Porto Grande(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Rorainópolis(RR)
Porto Grande(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Porto Grande(AP)
11,782 EH
EH
Planning and regularization
Rorainópolis(RR)
Am302
Braço norte do arquipélago de Marajó
Pancada do Camaipi
Rio Preto Padauiri
Rio Curumuri
Bacia Matapi
Ninhal de Lontra
Matão do Piacaçá
Campos do Aracá-Demini
P.A. Nova Colina
418
6,448
7,111
42
173
3,448
2,810
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
211 H
5,746
57
14,897
371
VH
H
EH
H
217 H
5,952
9,277
6,408
7,521
245
9,688
1,024
5,862
386
430
18,947
223
H
H
EH
EH
H
VH
H
H
EH
H
H
H
H
EH
H
VH
VH
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Soure(PA)
Barcelos(AM)
Breves(PA)
Gurupá(PA)
Laranjal do Jari(AP)
Anajás(PA)
Soure(PA)
H
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Santana(AP)
H
VH
H
H
Planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Laranjal do Jari(AP)
Mazagão(AP)
Barcelos(AM)
Santana(AP)
H
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Macapá(AP)
H
H
EH
EH
VH
H
H
H
VH
VH
H
VH
Planning and regularization
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Fisheries planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Watershed management
Creation sustainable use PA
Planning and regularization
Creation full protection PA
Planning and regularization
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Rorainópolis(RR)
Barcelos(AM)
Afuá(PA)
Macapá(AP)
Santana(AP)
Barcelos(AM)
Santana(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Barcelos(AM)
Macapá(AP)
São Gabriel da Cachoeira(AM)
188
Am303
Am304
AmZc305
AmZc306
AmZc308
AmZc309
Am310
Am311
AmZc312
AmZc313
P.A. Corre Água
P.A. Manoel Jacinto
Bacia do Gurijuba
Bailique
Pororoca
Apurema II
Castanhal
Expansion of P.N. Serra da Mocidade
59
164
2,808
410
758
1,097
2,850
1,499
3,126
3,678
H
H
H
H
H
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
Planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Recuperation
Macapá(AP)
Porto Grande(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Caroebe(RR)
Barcelos(AM)
Amapá(AP)
Amapá(AP)
6,472 VH
VH
Planning and regularization
Caracaraí(RR)
H
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
Planning and regularization
Creation full protection PA
Planning and regularization
Creation full protection PA
Pracuúba(AP)
Amapá(AP)
Amapá(AP)
Amapá(AP)
12,146 EH
EH
Planning and regularization
Boa Vista(RR)
H
EH
VH
VH
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Bonfim(RR)
Amapá(AP)
Amapá(AP)
Alto Alegre(RR)
H
Planning and regularization
Boa Vista(RR)
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Alto Alegre(RR)
Bonfim(RR)
Amajari(RR)
Pacaraima(RR)
Pacaraima(RR)
Am325
Am326
Am327
Am328
Am329
Apurema
Entorno da REBIO do Lago Piratuba
Highway planning and regularization
BR-174/RR-170 (center)
P.A. Cujubim
Ponta do Lago Piratuba
P.A. Piquiá do Amapá
Canal do Varadouro
Highway planning and regularization
BR-174/RR-170 (North)
Serra da Lua - Lavrado
Cerrado do Rio Amapá Grande
Litoral de Calçoene
Pirandirá
Highway planning and regularization
BR-174 (lavrado/Mucajaí/R. Parimé)
Ampliação da ESEC Maracá
Tucano (RR)
Serra do Tepequém
Cararuau (região da Pedra Pintada)
Parima
Am415
TI Jaminawa do Rio Caeté
398 VH
VH
Am424
TI Caiapucá
185 EH
EH
Am437
TI Iquirema / Monte Primavera / Goiaba
97 EH
EH
Am480
PN Umari
8,323 VH
VH
Am314
AmZc315
AmZc316
AmZc317
AmZc318
Am319
Am320
AmZc321
AmZc322
Am323
Am324
Am488
TI Igarapé Curriã
107
888
43
476
3,094
2,188
2,479
1,002
EH
EH
EH
VH
15,797 EH
552
2,055
220
1,401
1,881
538 EH
VH
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Creation full protection PA
Recognition Indigenous /
Quilombola lands
Sena Madureira(AC)
Boca do Acre(AM)
Boca do Acre(AM)
Lábrea(AM)
Lábrea(AM)
189
Am490
Am516
Am528
Am563
Am565
Am588
Am643
Am658
Am697
Am708
AmZc740
AmZc741
Am811
Am832
Am017
Am054
Am129
Am132
Am145
Am155
Am225
Am330
Ipixuna
RESEX Igarapé Preto
RESEX Quiriru/Canama
PE do Encontro das Águas
PE Matupiri Setor Sul
RESEX do Mutum
RESEX Lago Piorini
APA do Gurupi
PE do Cueiras
RESEX do Rio Puruê
RESEX Quatipuru
RESEX Itatupã-Baquiá
Expansion of ESEC Niquiá
APA Barreira Branca
TI Naruvoto
TI Terena
RDS do Juma
RDS do Cujubim
RDS Rio Madeira
RDS Tucuruí- Ararão
RESEX do Rio Unini
PE Serra de Santa Bárbara
Am331
811
1,058
4,153
65
4,585
146
7,276
397
567
9,181
235
660
938
575
279
304
5,842
25,054
2,837
289
8,427
1,577
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
IK
VH
H
H
H
VH
VH
VH
H
VH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
H
H
Planning and regularization
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
PE Serra de Ricardo Franco
1,590 EH
VH
Protected Area
Am333
Am334
Am335
Am336
Am337
Am338
Am339
Am340
TI Vale do Guaporé
PE Corumbiara
RESEX Pedras Negras
TI Omere
TI Irantxe
TI Rio Mequens
TI Tubarão Latunde
TI Massaco
2,432
4,359
1,397
282
2,530
1,090
1,164
4,238
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Am341
REBIO Guaporé
2,107 EH
EH
Protected Area
Am342
TI Kwazá do Rio São Pedro
164 H
VH
Protected Area
Humaitá(AM)
Eirunepé(AM)
Carauari(AM)
São João do Araguaia(PA)
Manicoré(AM)
Novo Repartimento(PA)
Coari(AM)
Paragominas(PA)
Manaus(AM)
Santo Antônio do Içá(AM)
Tracuateua(PA)
Gurupá(PA)
Caracaraí(RR)
Aragominas(TO)
Canarana(MT)
Peixoto de Azevedo(MT)
Manicoré(AM)
Eirunepé(AM)
Manicoré(AM)
Tucuruí(PA)
Barcelos(AM)
Pontes e Lacerda(MT)
Vila Bela da Santíssima
Trindade(MT)
Vilhena(RO)
Alta Floresta D'Oeste(RO)
Alta Floresta D'Oeste(RO)
Corumbiara(RO)
Brasnorte(MT)
Alto Alegre dos Parecis(RO)
Vilhena(RO)
Alta Floresta D'Oeste(RO)
São Miguel do
Guaporé(RO)
Parecis(RO)
190
Am343
PE Serra dos Reis
Am344
Am345
Am346
Am347
Am348
Am349
Am350
Am351
Am352
Am353
Am355
Am356
Am357
Am358
Am359
Am360
Am361
Am362
Am363
Am364
Am365
Am366
Am367
Am368
Am369
Am370
Am371
Am372
Am373
Am374
Am375
Am376
Am377
Am378
TI Rio Branco
RESEX Estadual rio Cautário
TI Guaporé
TI Sagarana
TI Xingu-Batovi
RESEX Federal Rio Cautário
PN Serra da Cotia
TI Marãwatsedê
TI Wawi
RESEX Barreiro das Antas
TI Parque do Aripuanã
TI Pacaás Novos
RESEX Pacaás Novos
ESEC do Rio Acre
TI Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau / PN Pacaás Novos
TI Erikbatsa
TI Cabeceira do Rio Acre
TI Rio Negro Ocaia
TI Roosevelt
TI Roosevelt
REBIO Rio Ouro Preto
TI Mamoadate
TI Serra Morena
TI Sete de Setembro
TI 7 de Setembro
RESEX Rio Ouro Preto
TI Apiacá-Caiabi
RESEX Chico Mendes
TI Japuíra
PE Guajará-Mirim
TI Igarapé Laje
TI Urubu Branco
TI Zooró
TI Aripuanã
364 EH
2,390
1,520
1,200
180
26,438
753
2,892
1,654
1,500
1,030
16,131
2,845
3,562
815
18,861
817
817
1,072
2,311
2,311
575
3,295
1,484
2,497
2,497
2,024
1,105
9,478
1,531
2,087
1,086
1,668
3,565
7,537
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
VH
Protected Area
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
H
H
H
VH
EH
H
H
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
H
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
São Francisco do
Guaporé(RO)
Alta Floresta D'Oeste(RO)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Peixoto de Azevedo(MT)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
São Félix do Araguaia(MT)
São Félix do Araguaia(MT)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Vilhena(RO)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Assis Brasil(AC)
Jaru(RO)
Juína(MT)
Brasiléia(AC)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Vilhena(RO)
Vilhena(RO)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Sena Madureira(AC)
Juína(MT)
Cacoal(RO)
Cacoal(RO)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Juara(MT)
Rio Branco(AC)
Juara(MT)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Confresa(MT)
Rondolândia(MT)
Vilhena(RO)
191
Am379
Am381
Am382
Am383
Am384
Am385
Am386
Am387
Am388
Am389
Am390
Am391
Am392
Am393
Am394
Am395
Am396
Am397
Am398
Am399
Am400
Am401
Am402
Am403
Am404
Am405
Am407
Am408
Am409
Am410
Am411
Am412
Am413
Am414
Am416
TI Igarapé Lurdes
TI Igarapé-Ribeirão
PE Alto Chandless
TI Kampa e Isolados do Rio Envira
TI Capoto-Jarina
TI Riozinho do Alto Envira
TI Karipuna
TI Alto da Tarauacá
TI Kaxinawá Ashaninka do Rio Breu
TI Kaxinawá do Rio Jordão
TI Jaminawa / Envira
REBIO Jaru
RESEX Jaci-Paraná
TI Kulina do Rio Envira
PE do Xingu
RESEX Aquariquara
TI Arara do Rio Branco
TI Kampa do Rio Amônea
TI Kaxinawá Seringal Independência
TI Kaxinawá do Baixo Rio Jordão
TI Kaxarari
FLONA Bom Futuro
FLONA Santa Rosa do Purus
TI Kaxinawá do Rio Humaitá
TI Kulina Igarapé do pau
TI Alto Rio Purus
RESEX do Alto Juruá
FERS Rio Vermelho - B
ESEC Mojica Nava
RESEX Massaranduba
PE do Cristalino
FERS Mutum
TI Kaxarari
TI Apurinã Km 124 BR-317
TI Escondido
1,918
494
7,175
2,449
6,368
2,671
1,565
1,492
266
949
841
3,498
1,993
856
973
183
1,153
830
121
91
493
2,798
1,581
1,347
475
2,723
5,644
315
184
62
2,004
128
1,002
434
1,709
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
H
EH
VH
H
VH
H
H
H
EH
H
H
H
H
VH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
EH
H
H
H
EH
H
H
H
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Ji-Paraná(RO)
Nova Mamoré(RO)
Sena Madureira(AC)
Feijó(AC)
Peixoto de Azevedo(MT)
Feijó(AC)
Porto Velho(RO)
Feijó(AC)
Marechal Thaumaturgo(AC)
Feijó(AC)
Feijó(AC)
Ji-Paraná(RO)
Porto Velho(RO)
Feijó(AC)
São Félix do Xingu(PA)
Machadinho D'Oeste(RO)
Aripuanã(MT)
Marechal Thaumaturgo(AC)
Jordão(AC)
Marechal Thaumaturgo(AC)
Porto Velho(RO)
Porto Velho(RO)
Feijó(AC)
Feijó(AC)
Feijó(AC)
Sena Madureira(AC)
Tarauacá(AC)
Porto Velho(RO)
Porto Velho(RO)
Machadinho D'Oeste(RO)
Alta Floresta(MT)
Cujubim(RO)
Porto Velho(RO)
Lábrea(AM)
Cotriguaçu(MT)
192
Am417
Am418
Am419
Am420
Am421
Am422
Am423
Am425
Am426
Am427
Am428
Am429
Am430
Am431
Am432
Am433
Am434
Am435
Am436
Am438
Am439
Am440
Am441
Am442
Am443
Am444
Am445
Am446
Am447
Am448
Am449
Am450
Am451
Am452
Am453
TI Kaxinawá Nova Olinda
TI Karitiana
RESEX Maracatiara
RESEX Angelim
TI Panará
FLONA Jamari
TI Boca do Acre
ESEC Serra dos Três Irmãos
TI Jaminawa Arara do Rio Bagé
RESEX do Arapixi
TI Igarapé Capana
RESEX R.P. Jacundá
TI Kampa do Igarapé Primavera
ESEC Samuel
ESEC do Rio Madeirinha
TI Rio Pardo
REBIO Nascentes da Serra do
Cachimbo
ESEC do Rio Roosevelt
PE do Tucumã
PE Igarapé do Juruena
TI Camicuã
TI Badjonkore
TI Arara do Igarapé Humaitá
TI Kaxinawá da Praia Carapanã
PE do Guariba
TI Rio Gregório
FLOES de Manicoré
TI Kaiabi I
TI Kaiabi II
RESEX Riozinho da Liberdade
TI Kaxinawá Igarapé do Caucho
TI Menkragnoti
PN do Juruena
FERS Rio Madeira - B
FLONA do Mapiá-Inauini
269
911
89
93
4,985
2,243
273
930
303
1,376
1,342
1,165
230
750
108
1,665
EH
H
H
H
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Feijó(AC)
Porto Velho(RO)
Machadinho D'Oeste(RO)
Machadinho D'Oeste(RO)
Altamira(PA)
Candeias do Jamari(RO)
Lábrea(AM)
Porto Velho(RO)
Tarauacá(AC)
Boca do Acre(AM)
Boca do Acre(AM)
Porto Velho(RO)
Tarauacá(AC)
Candeias do Jamari(RO)
Colniza(MT)
Apuí(AM)
3,433 EH
EH
Protected Area
Altamira(PA)
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Novo Aripuanã(AM)
Novo Aripuanã(AM)
Apuí(AM)
Boca do Acre(AM)
São Félix do Xingu(PA)
Tarauacá(AC)
Tarauacá(AC)
Novo Aripuanã(AM)
Tarauacá(AC)
Novo Aripuanã(AM)
Jacareacanga(PA)
Jacareacanga(PA)
Cruzeiro do Sul(AC)
Feijó(AC)
Altamira(PA)
Maués(AM)
Porto Velho(RO)
Boca do Acre(AM)
609
679
2,281
600
2,222
919
634
704
1,960
817
9,448
1,110
3,272
127
49,280
19,628
521
3,748
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
193
Am454
Am455
Am456
Am457
Am458
Am459
Am460
Am461
Am462
Am463
Am464
Am465
Am466
Am467
Am468
Am469
Am470
Am471
Am472
Am474
Am475
Am476
Am477
Am478
Am479
Am481
Am482
Am483
Am485
Am486
Am487
Am489
Am491
Am492
Am493
PN Serra do Divisor
FLONA Jacundá
TI Tenharim do Igarapé Preto
RDS Aripuanã
FERS Rio Machado
FLONA do Purus
TI Jaminawa do Igarapé Preto
PN dos Campos Amazônicos
TI Kaxinawá Colônia Vinte e Sete
FLOES do Sucunduri
TI Katukina/Kaxinawá
RESEX Cuniã
TI Tenharim Marmelos
TI Servini / Mariene
TI Peneri / Tacaquiri
PE do Sucunduri
ESEC Cuniã
FLOES do Rio Gregório
TI Alto Sepatini
TI Campinas / Katukina
TI Tumiã
TI Inauini / Teuini
FLONA Humaitá
FERS Rio Madeira - A
FLOES do Mogno
TI São Pedro do Sepatini
TI Diahui
TI Acimã
TI Caititu
TI Poyanawa
TI Guajahã
TI Las Casas
TI Nukini
TI Paumari do Lago Marahã
PN do Rio Novo
8,901
2,240
862
2,222
944
1,998
270
8,866
1
4,869
255
527
5,022
1,460
1,989
7,898
503
2,228
267
352
1,299
4,845
4,585
647
1,485
282
479
415
3,151
258
52
212
349
1,209
5,401
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
H
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
H
EH
H
H
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
VH
VH
H
EH
H
EH
VH
VH
VH
H
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
H
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Cruzeiro do Sul(AC)
Porto Velho(RO)
Novo Aripuanã(AM)
Apuí(AM)
Porto Velho(RO)
Boca do Acre(AM)
Cruzeiro do Sul(AC)
Manicoré(AM)
Tarauacá(AC)
Apuí(AM)
Feijó(AC)
Porto Velho(RO)
Manicoré(AM)
Lábrea(AM)
Pauini(AM)
Apuí(AM)
Porto Velho(RO)
Tarauacá(AC)
Lábrea(AM)
Cruzeiro do Sul(AC)
Lábrea(AM)
Boca do Acre(AM)
Porto Velho(RO)
Porto Velho(RO)
Cruzeiro do Sul(AC)
Lábrea(AM)
Humaitá(AM)
Lábrea(AM)
Lábrea(AM)
Mâncio Lima(AC)
Pauini(AM)
Redenção(PA)
Mâncio Lima(AC)
Lábrea(AM)
Itaituba(PA)
194
Am494
Am495
Am496
Am497
Am498
Am500
Am501
Am502
Am503
Am504
Am505
Am506
Am507
Am508
Am509
Am510
Am511
Am512
Am513
Am514
Am515
Am517
Am518
Am519
Am520
Am521
Am522
Am523
Am524
Am525
Am526
Am527
Am529
Am530
Am531
TI Apurinã do Igarapé Mucuím
TI Cacau do Tarauacá
TI Kayapó
TI Catipari/Mamoria
TI Água Preta / Inari
FLONA do Jatuarana
TI Nove de Janeiro
TI Paumari do Rio Ituxi
TI Kulina do Médio Juruá
TI Juma
TI Munduruku
TI Tenharim Marmelos (Gleba B)
FLONA Jamanxim
TI Camadeni
TI Baú
TI Jarawara / Jamamadi / Kanamati
TI Sepoti
TI Pirahã
TI Xambioá
TI Kanamari do Rio Juruá
TI Hi Merimã
FLONA Balata-Tufari
TI Zuruahã
TI Deni
TI Mawetek
TI Banawa
TI Ipixuna
FLONA Crepori
TI Sai-Cinza
FLOTA Iriri
TI Torá
TI Xikrin do Rio Catete
APA do Lago Santa Isabel
TI Lago Jauari
APA São Geraldo do Araguaia
742
297
32,856
1,171
1,446
5,815
2,334
77
7,574
391
23,906
4,796
13,022
1,558
15,385
3,966
2,535
3,504
34
6,224
6,913
8,141
2,436
15,685
1,201
1,984
2,175
7,434
1,253
4,426
513
4,397
187
118
265
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
VH
EH
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
EH
H
VH
H
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Lábrea(AM)
Envira(AM)
São Félix do Xingu(PA)
Lábrea(AM)
Lábrea(AM)
Apuí(AM)
Humaitá(AM)
Lábrea(AM)
Tarauacá(AC)
Canutama(AM)
Itaituba(PA)
Manicoré(AM)
Itaituba(PA)
Lábrea(AM)
Altamira(PA)
Lábrea(AM)
Manicoré(AM)
Manicoré(AM)
Santa Fé do Araguaia(TO)
Eirunepé(AM)
Lábrea(AM)
Humaitá(AM)
Tapauá(AM)
Lábrea(AM)
Eirunepé(AM)
Lábrea(AM)
Humaitá(AM)
Itaituba(PA)
Jacareacanga(PA)
Altamira(PA)
Manicoré(AM)
Marabá(PA)
São Geraldo do Araguaia(PA)
Manicoré(AM)
São Geraldo do Araguaia(PA)
195
Am532
Am533
Am534
Am535
Am536
Am537
Am538
Am539
Am540
Am541
Am542
Am543
Am544
Am545
Am546
Am547
Am548
Am549
Am550
Am551
Am552
Am553
Am554
Am555
Am556
Am557
Am558
Am559
Am560
Am561
Am562
Am564
Am566
Am567
Am568
PE Serra das Andorinhas/Martírios
FLONA Carajás
TI Ariramba
TI Paumari do Cuniuá
TI Vale do Javari
TI Lago Capanã
APA Tapajós
TI Paumari do Lago Paricá
FLONA Itacaiúnas
APA do Iguarapé Gelado
TI Sororó
RESEX do Lago do Capanã Grande
TI Paumari do Lago Manissuã
RDS de Uacari
PN da Serra do Pardo
FLONA Tupirapé- Aquiri
TI Apurinã do Igarapé Tauamirim
TI Kuruáya
TI Pinatuba
ESEC Terra do Meio
PN do Jamanxim
TI Apyterewa
REBIO Tapirapé
TI Apuninã do Igarapé São João
TI Governador
RESEX Mata Grande
TI Xipaya
TI Urucú/Juruá
FLONA de Itaituba I
RESEX do Médio Juruá
RESEX Extremo Norte
RESEX Ciriaco
REBIO do Abufari
TI Mãe Maria
TI Araribóia
326
3,935
108
436
89,145
67
20,618
161
818
206
262
3,096
234
6,380
4,464
1,920
1,043
1,666
304
33,766
8,641
7,743
999
196
422
130
1,788
129
2,198
2,595
85
72
2,270
631
4,174
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
H
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
H
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
H
VH
VH
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
São Geraldo do Araguaia(PA)
Marabá(PA)
Manicoré(AM)
Tapauá(AM)
Eirunepé(AM)
Manicoré(AM)
Itaituba(PA)
Tapauá(AM)
Marabá(PA)
Marabá(PA)
Marabá(PA)
Manicoré(AM)
Tapauá(AM)
Tapauá(AM)
Altamira(PA)
Marabá(PA)
Tapauá(AM)
Altamira(PA)
Manicoré(AM)
Altamira(PA)
Itaituba(PA)
São Félix do Xingu(PA)
Marabá(PA)
Tapauá(AM)
Amarante do Maranhão(MA)
Imperatriz(MA)
Altamira(PA)
Grajaú(MA)
Itaituba(PA)
Carauari(AM)
Carrasco Bonito(TO)
Imperatriz(MA)
Tapauá(AM)
Marabá(PA)
Santa Luzia(MA)
196
Am569
Am570
Am571
Am572
Am573
Am574
Am575
Am576
Am577
Am578
Am579
Am580
Am581
Am582
Am583
Am584
Am585
Am586
Am587
Am589
Am590
Am591
Am592
Am593
Am594
Am595
Am596
Am597
Am598
Am599
Am600
Am601
Am602
Am603
Am604
TI Geralda Toco Preto
FLONA de Itaiutuba II
RESEX do Médio Xingu
RESEX Riozinho do Anfrísio
TI Rio Biá
TI Araweté
FLONA de Trairão
RESEX Rio Iriri
TI Parakanã
TI Mora Jacundá
TI Terra Vermelha
TI Terra Vermelha
FLONA de Pau-Rosa
TI São Leopoldo
RDS Piagaçu Purus
TI Coatá Laranjal
TI Lauro Sodré
TI Trincheira Bacajá
TI Tukuna Porto Espiritual
TI Tikuna Santo Antônio
TI Bom Intento
TI Cunhã-Sapucaia
TI Tikúna de Feijoal
TI Tukuna Umariaçu
TI Lago Aiapua
TI Sapotal
PN da Amazônia
APA Tucuruí
TI Cachoeira Seca
TI Koatinemo
FLONA de Tefé
TI Kararaô
FLOES de Maues
TI Cajuhiri Atravessado
RDS Canumã
187
4,245
3,064
7,362
12,321
9,413
2,576
3,990
3,521
4
1,775
69
9,559
751
8,079
11,674
98
16,561
31
14
10
4,739
408
50
242
13
10,226
5,235
7,499
3,880
8,828
3,308
4,310
123
182
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
VH
VH
H
H
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
VH
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Arame(MA)
Itaituba(PA)
Altamira(PA)
Itaituba(PA)
Carauari(AM)
Altamira(PA)
Itaituba(PA)
Altamira(PA)
Itupiranga(PA)
Rondon do Pará(PA)
Coari(AM)
Beruri(AM)
Itaituba(PA)
São Paulo de Olivença(AM)
Coari(AM)
Borba(AM)
Benjamin Constant(AM)
Altamira(PA)
Benjamin Constant(AM)
Benjamin Constant(AM)
Benjamin Constant(AM)
Careiro(AM)
São Paulo de Olivença(AM)
Tabatinga(AM)
Anori(AM)
Tabatinga(AM)
Itaituba(PA)
Tucuruí(PA)
Altamira(PA)
Altamira(PA)
Tefé(AM)
Altamira(PA)
Maués(AM)
Coari(AM)
Borba(AM)
197
Am605
Am606
Am607
Am608
Am609
Am610
AmZc611
Am612
Am613
Am614
Am615
Am616
Am617
Am618
Am619
Am620
Am621
Am622
Am623
Am624
Am625
Am626
Am627
Am628
Am629
Am630
Am631
Am632
Am633
Am634
Am635
Am636
Am637
Am638
TI Évare II
TI Évare I
TI Rio Jumas
TI Lago do Beruri
TI Miguel/Josefa
TI Fortaleza do Castanho
APA Baixada Maranhense - Baixo
Mearim
TI Padre
TI Tabocal
TI Karú
REBIO Gurupi
TI Arara
TI São Pedro
TI Andirá-Marau
TI Trincheira
APA Baixada Maranhense - Baixo
Mearim
TI Ilha do Camaleão
TI Nova Esperança do Rio Jandiatu*
TI Rio Pindaré
TI Vui-Uata-In
RESEX do Baixo Juruá
TI Lago do Marienheiro
TI Arara Volta Grande
RESEX Rio Jutaí
TI Trocará
TI Natal/Felicidade
TI Itaitinga
FLONA do Tapajós
TI Paracuhuba
TI Recreio/São Félix
TI Cuia
TI Barreira da Missão
TI São Francisco do Canimari
TI Paquiçamba
1,788
5,673
95
43
16
28
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
São Paulo de Olivença(AM)
Tabatinga(AM)
Careiro(AM)
Beruri(AM)
Autazes(AM)
Manaquiri(AM)
3,534 EH
EH
Protected Area
Bacabal(MA)
8
9
1,774
2,731
2,749
6
7,933
17
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Autazes(AM)
Careiro(AM)
Bom Jardim(MA)
Paragominas(PA)
Altamira(PA)
Autazes(AM)
Itaituba(PA)
Autazes(AM)
567 VH
EH
Protected Area
Santa Luzia(MA)
VH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Anamã(AM)
São Paulo de Olivença(AM)
Bom Jardim(MA)
Jutaí(AM)
Uarini(AM)
Careiro(AM)
Senador José Porfírio(PA)
Jutaí(AM)
Tucuruí(PA)
Autazes(AM)
Autazes(AM)
Rurópolis(PA)
Autazes(AM)
Autazes(AM)
Autazes(AM)
Tefé(AM)
Amaturá(AM)
Senador José Porfírio(PA)
2
206
117
1,254
1,916
36
255
2,830
217
3
1
5,492
9
2
13
19
34
41
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
198
Am639
Am640
AmZc641
Am642
Am644
AmZc645
Am646
Am647
Am648
Am649
Am650
Am651
Am652
Am653
Am654
Am655
Am656
Am657
Am659
Am660
Am661
Am662
Am663
Am664
Am665
Am666
Am667
Am668
Am669
Am670
Am671
Am672
Am673
Am674
TI Patauá
TI Gavião
APA Baixada Maranhense - baixo
Pindaré
TI Apipica
TI Awá
RESEX dos Lagos de Penalva
TI Maraitá
TI Barreirinha
TI Igarapé Grande
TI Meria
ESEC Jutaí-Solimões
TI Marajai
TI Boa Vista - AM
TI Paraná do Arauató
TI Tupã-Supé
TI Fortaleza do Patauá
TI Porto do Limoeiro
RESEX Ipaú-Anilzinho
TI Jaquiri
TI Betania
TI Rio Urubu
TI Jatuarana
TI Sarauá
TI Miratu
RESEX Tapajós-Arapiuns
TI Lago do Correa
TI Matintin
TI Kumaru do Lago Ualá
TI Macarrão
TI Matintin
TI Porto Praia
TI Estrela da Paz
TI São Domingos do Jacapari e
Estação
TI Alto Turiaçu
6 EH
84 VH
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Autazes(AM)
Careiro da Várzea(AM)
2,195 VH
EH
Protected Area
Santa Inês(MA)
7
1,167
187
547
24
12
6
2,574
10
3
59
87
8
52
560
20
1,263
277
51
187
142
6,746
133
80
816
446
127
47
129
VH
VH
VH
EH
H
H
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Careiro da Várzea(AM)
Zé Doca(MA)
Penalva(MA)
Santo Antônio do Içá(AM)
Paragominas(PA)
Alvarães(AM)
Alvarães(AM)
Santo Antônio do Içá(AM)
Alvarães(AM)
Careiro da Várzea(AM)
Itacoatiara(AM)
Uarini(AM)
Manacapuru(AM)
Santo Antônio do Içá(AM)
Baião(PA)
Uarini(AM)
Santo Antônio do Içá(AM)
Itacoatiara(AM)
Manacapuru(AM)
Paragominas(PA)
Uarini(AM)
Santarém(PA)
Santo Antônio do Içá(AM)
Santo Antônio do Içá(AM)
Uarini(AM)
Jutaí(AM)
Santo Antônio do Içá(AM)
Uarini(AM)
Jutaí(AM)
1,384 EH
EH
Protected Area
Jutaí(AM)
5,356 VH
H
Protected Area
Paragominas(PA)
199
Am675
Am676
Am677
Am678
Am679
Am680
Am681
AmZc682
AmZc683
Am684
Am685
AmZc686
Am687
AmZc688
AmZc689
AmZc690
Am691
Am692
Am693
Am694
Am695
Am696
Am698
Am699
Am700
Am701
Am702
Am703
AmZc704
Am705
Am706
Am707
TI Anambé
TI Santa Cruz de Nova Aliança
TI Barro Alto
TI Espírito Santo
APA Margem Direita do Rio Negro
Setor Paduari/Solimões
TI São Sebastião
TI Prosperidade
RESEX do Taim
APA Upaon-açu / Miritiba / Alto
Preguiça (Oeste)
PE do Rio Negro Setor Sul
TI Tembé
PE do Bacanga
TI Acapurí de Cima
APA Baixada Maranhense - Estuário
APA do Maracanã
APA do Itapiracá
ESEC de Anavilhanas
TI Uati- Paraná
RDS Mamirauá
TI Cuiu-Cuiu
APA Nhamundá
TI Alto Rio Guamá
RDS do Uatumã
ESEC Juami - Japurá
TI Turé-Mariquita II
RDS Amanã
PN do Jaú
APA Margem Esquerda do Rio
Negro Setor Aturiá/Apuauzinho
RESEX Cedral/Guimarães/Porto
Rico/Alcatara
PE de Nhamundá
RESEX Verde Para Sempre
TI Maparí
86
59
20
347
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Moju(PA)
Tonantins(AM)
Tonantins(AM)
Jutaí(AM)
5,720 EH
EH
Protected Area
Manaus(AM)
627 EH
49 EH
30 H
EH
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Jutaí(AM)
Tonantins(AM)
São Luís(MA)
6,115 EH
EH
Protected Area
São Luís(MA)
EH
H
H
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
H
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Manaus(AM)
Tomé-Açu(PA)
São Luís(MA)
Fonte Boa(AM)
São Luís(MA)
São Luís(MA)
São Luís(MA)
Manaus(AM)
Fonte Boa(AM)
Fonte Boa(AM)
Maraã(AM)
Parintins(AM)
Paragominas(PA)
Presidente Figueiredo(AM)
Santo Antônio do Içá(AM)
Tomé-Açu(PA)
Coari(AM)
Barcelos(AM)
5,170 EH
EH
Protected Area
Manaus(AM)
772 EH
EH
Protected Area
Cururupu(MA)
565 EH
12,888 EH
1,616 EH
EH
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Nhamundá(AM)
Prainha(PA)
Fonte Boa(AM)
1,581
11
13
204
11,046
10
11
3,570
1,209
13,327
371
2,032
2,844
4,296
8,681
6
22,444
23,965
200
Am709
Am710
Am711
AmZc712
Am713
AmZc714
Am715
Am716
AmZc717
Am718
Am719
Am720
AmZc722
Am723
AmZc724
Am725
Am726
Am727
Am728
AmZc729
AmZc730
AmZc731
AmZc732
AmZc733
AmZc734
AmZc735
AmZc736
Am737
Am738
AmZc739
Am742
AmZc743
AmZc744
AmZc745
AmZc746
PE do Rio Negro Setor Norte
APA Paytuna
RESEX Auati-Paraná
RESEX do Quilombo do Frechal
PE Monte Alegre
FLONA de Caxiuanã
TI Parana do Paricá
APA Caverna do Maroaga
APA Baixada Maranhense - Litoral
TI Paraná do Boa Boa
TI Maraã Urubaxi
FLONA de Saracá-Taquera
RESEX de Cururupu
TI Uneiuxi I e II
RESEX Terra Grande Pracuúba
FLOTA Faro
REBIO de Uatumã
TI Rio Apaporis
REBIO do Rio Trombetas
RESEX Mapuá
RESEX Marinha Araí Peroba
RESEX Marinha Gurupi Piriá
APA Costa do Urumajó (Municipal)
RESEX Ituquara
RESEX Chocoaré-Mato Grosso
RESEX Marinha Caeté Taperaçu
RESEX Marinha Tracuateua
TI Waimiri-Atroari
TI Nhamunda-Mapuera
APA da Ilha Canela (Municipal)
TI Médio Rio Negro I
RESEX de Maracanã
RESEX Lago Arari
RESEX Mãe Grande de Curuçá
RESEX do Rio Cajari
1,499
564
1,497
89
59
3,229
82
3,774
6,096
2,510
952
4,418
1,870
5,640
1,806
6,296
9,428
1,094
4,096
574
118
748
288
1,276
28
429
276
25,992
10,503
5
18,276
318
1,582
335
5,025
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
H
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
IK
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
H
H
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
H
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Novo Airão(AM)
Monte Alegre(PA)
Fonte Boa(AM)
Mirinzal(MA)
Monte Alegre(PA)
Portel(PA)
Maraã(AM)
Rio Preto da Eva(AM)
São Luís(MA)
Santa Isabel do Rio Negro(AM)
Barcelos(AM)
Oriximiná(PA)
Cururupu(MA)
Santa Isabel do Rio Negro(AM)
Breves(PA)
Oriximiná(PA)
Urucará(AM)
Japurá(AM)
Oriximiná(PA)
Breves(PA)
Viseu(PA)
Viseu(PA)
Bragança(PA)
Breves(PA)
Maracanã(PA)
Bragança(PA)
Bragança(PA)
Urucará(AM)
Oriximiná(PA)
São Gabriel da Cachoeira(AM)
Salinópolis(PA)
Soure(PA)
Curuçá(PA)
Laranjal do Jari(AP)
201
Am747
AmZc748
Am749
Am750
AmZc751
Am752
AmZc753
Am754
Am755
Am756
AmZc757
Am758
Am759
Am760
Am761
Am762
AmZc763
Am764
Am765
Am766
Am767
Am768
Am769
Am770
AmZc771
Am772
Am773
Am774
Am775
AmZc776
Am777
Am778
Am779
Am780
Am781
TI Rio Téa
RESEX de Itatupã
ESEC Jari
FLOTA Parú
RESEX Foz do Rio Amazonas
TI Médio Rio Negro II
RESEX Marinha Machadinho
FLOTA Trombetas
TI Zo´é
TI Trombetas-Mapuera
APA do Rio Curiaú
RDS Rio Iratapuru
TI Balaio
TI Alto Rio Negro
TI Rio Paru d´Este
REBIO Maicuru
REBIO Parazinho
ESEC Grão-Pará
PE da Serra do Araçá
TI Waiãpi
PN Serra da Mocidade
ESEC Niquiá
PN do Viruá
TI Wai-Wai
REBIO do Lago Piratuba
TI Parque Indígena do Tumucumaque
ESEC de Caracaraí
PN Montanhas do Tumucumaque
TI Jacamin
ESEC de Maracá-Jipióca
TI Yanomami
TI Muriru
TI Malacacheta
TI Tabalascada
TI Moskow
4,205
585
2,324
36,049
3,092
3,218
825
31,405
6,691
39,964
187
8,744
2,619
80,840
11,947
11,492
5
42,087
3,656
6,120
3,775
2,844
2,325
3,888
3,943
30,531
842
38,686
1,843
600
95,307
56
287
131
143
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
IK
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
H
H
H
EH
EH
H
H
H
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
São Gabriel da Cachoeira(AM)
Afuá(PA)
Almeirim(PA)
Monte Alegre(PA)
Afuá(PA)
São Gabriel da Cachoeira(AM)
Soure(PA)
Oriximiná(PA)
Oriximiná(PA)
Oriximiná(PA)
Macapá(AP)
Almeirim(PA)
São Gabriel da Cachoeira(AM)
São Gabriel da Cachoeira(AM)
Monte Alegre(PA)
Monte Alegre(PA)
Monte Alegre(PA)
Barcelos(AM)
Almeirim(PA)
Barcelos(AM)
Caracaraí(RR)
Rorainópolis(RR)
Caracaraí(RR)
Amapá(AP)
Oriximiná(PA)
Caracaraí(RR)
Almeirim(PA)
Caracaraí(RR)
Amapá(AP)
São Gabriel da Cachoeira(AM)
Bonfim(RR)
Cantá(RR)
Cantá(RR)
Bonfim(RR)
202
Am782
Am783
Am784
Am785
Am786
Am787
Am788
Am789
Am790
Am791
Am792
Am793
Am794
Am795
Am796
Am797
AmZc798
Am799
Am800
AmZc801
Am802
Am803
Am804
Am805
AmZc806
AmZc807
Am808
Am809
Am810
AmZc812
Am812
Am813
Am814
Am815
Am816
TI Camauamin
TI Raimundão
TI Manoá / Pium
TI Sucuba
TI Jabuti
TI Truaru
TI Serra da Moça
TI Boqueirão(RR)
TI Mangueira
TI Barata Livramento
TI Anta
ESEC de Maracá
TI Pium
TI Bom Jesus
TI Aningal
TI Ouro
TI Uaçá
TI Ponta da Serra
TI Araçá
PN do Cabo Orange
TI Cajueiro
TI São Marcos
TI Anaro
TI Ananás (RR)
TI Galibi
TI Juminá
TI Santa Inês
TI Raposa / Serra do Sol
ESEC do Rio Ronuro
RESEX Marinha de Soure
FLONA do Macauã
RESEX do Cazumbá-Iracema
FLONA de Altamira
ARIE de Javari-Buriti
FLONA do Amapá
115
43
451
60
143
60
114
166
47
130
33
1,045
46
9
77
142
4,711
158
513
6,456
45
6,497
307
29
43
320
304
16,933
1,333
153
1,742
6,995
7,583
130
4,581
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
H
H
H
H
VH
H
H
H
H
EH
H
H
H
EH
H
VH
EH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
H
EH
VH
VH
VH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
H
H
H
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Bonfim(RR)
Alto Alegre(RR)
Bonfim(RR)
Alto Alegre(RR)
Bonfim(RR)
Boa Vista(RR)
Boa Vista(RR)
Alto Alegre(RR)
Alto Alegre(RR)
Alto Alegre(RR)
Alto Alegre(RR)
Alto Alegre(RR)
Alto Alegre(RR)
Bonfim(RR)
Amajari(RR)
Boa Vista(RR)
Oiapoque(AP)
Pacaraima(RR)
Amajari(RR)
Oiapoque(AP)
Amajari(RR)
Boa Vista(RR)
Pacaraima(RR)
Amajari(RR)
Oiapoque(AP)
Oiapoque(AP)
Amajari(RR)
Boa Vista(RR)
Paranatinga(MT)
Soure(PA)
Sena Madureira(AC)
Sena Madureira(AC)
Itaituba(PA)
Santo Antônio do Içá(AM)
Porto Grande(AP)
203
Am817
Am818
Am819
Am820
Am821
Am822
Am823
Am824
Am825
Am826
Am827
Am828
Am829
Am830
Am831
Am833
Am834
Am835
Am836
Am837
Am838
RESEX Arioca Pruanã
FLONA do Amanã
RESEX do Alto Tarauacá
FLONA de Anauá
PN Pico da Neblina
FLONA do Amazonas
FLONA de Mulata
FE do Rio da Liberdade
FE do Antimary
RESEX do Catuá-Ipixuna
RDS do Rio Amapá
RESEX do Guariba
FLOREST do Aripuanã
FLOREST Apuí
RDS Bararati
FLOREST do Rio Urubu
FLONA do São Francisco
APA Médio Rio Negro Tarumã Açu/
Tarumã Mirim
REBIO Traçadal
TI Rio Manicoré
TI Batelão
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
563 H
H
Protected Area
Manaus(AM)
237 EH
195 EH
1,173 H
H
H
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Guajará-Mirim(RO)
Manicoré(AM)
Juara(MT)
595
5,275
1,571
2,619
8,826
737
2,155
822
679
2,188
2,161
1,474
3,202
1,823
1,114
272
219
Oeiras do Pará(PA)
Itaituba(PA)
Tarauacá(AC)
Rorainópolis(RR)
São Gabriel da Cachoeira(AM)
Santa Isabel do Rio Negro(AM)
Monte Alegre(PA)
Cruzeiro do Sul(AC)
Sena Madureira(AC)
Coari(AM)
Manicoré(AM)
Novo Aripuanã(AM)
Apuí(AM)
Apuí(AM)
Apuí(AM)
Rio Preto da Eva(AM)
Sena Madureira(AC)
Pantanal Biome
Table 11.9.2 – List of Priority Areas for the Pantanal Biome with: area code, size (km2), biological importance (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high, IK –
insufficiently known), urgency for action (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high), main priority action recommended, and main municipality.
Size (km2) Importance Priority Priority Action
Main Municipality
Area code Name
Pa001
Foz do Apa
823 EH
EH
Recuperation
Porto Murtinho(MS)
Creation of full protection PA
Pa002
Fecho de Morros
762 EH
EH
Porto Murtinho(MS)
Pa003
Aquidauana
497 VH
EH
Recuperation
Aquidauana(MS)
Pa004
Salobra
1,364 H
EH
Fostering sustainable use
Miranda(MS)
Pa005
Nabileque
3,319 IK
VH
Inventory
Corumbá(MS)
Pa006
Rio Negro
2,645 EH
VH
Fostering sustainable use
Corumbá(MS)
Pa007
Morro do Azeite
2,646 H
VH
Fostering sustainable use
Corumbá(MS)
204
Pa008
Pa009
Pa010
Pa011
Pa012
Pa013
Pa014
Pa015
Pa016
Pa017
Pa018
Pa019
Pa020
Pa021
Pa022
Pa023
Pa024
Pa025
Pa026
Pa027
Pa028
Pa029
Pa030
Pa031
Pa032
Pa033
Pa034
Pa035
Pa036
Pa037
Pa038
Pa039
Pa040
Pa041
Médio Abobral
Baixo Abobral
Vazante Alegria
Morraria do Urucum
Nhecolândia
Comunidades do Taquari
Corixinha
Vazante do Capivari
Pantanal do Rio Paraguai
Delta do Taquari
Baía Vermelha
Médio Taquari (Oeste)
Serra do Amolar
Expansion of P.N. do Pantanal
Matogrossense
Comunidade Bispo
Norte do Paiaguás
Serra Solteira
Rio Alegre
Pantanal da onça
Cáceres
Expansion of ESEC
RPPN Jubrã
Mata do Bebe
Região do Descalvado
Paraguaizinho
Bororo
Baixo Jauru
Serra do Facão
Baías e Morrarias de Barão de
Melgaço
Bocaiuval
Caiçara
Sangradouro
Cuiabá-mirim
Três bocas
555
698
5,182
2,031
7,112
2,329
1,218
113
5,225
2,809
412
724
311
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
1,419 VH
64
6,759
2,169
4,258
2,775
1,558
282
398
3,510
287
1,570
844
693
2,066
Creation sustainable use PA
Inventory
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Aquidauana(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
EH
Inventory
Corumbá(MS)
EH
VH
H
H
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
H
VH
H
VH
H
EH
H
VH
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
Recuperation
Inventory
Mosaic/Corridor
Inventory
Fostering sustainable use
Sonora(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Cáceres(MT)
Cáceres(MT)
Cáceres(MT)
Poconé(MT)
Cáceres(MT)
Cáceres(MT)
Santo Antônio do Leverger(MT)
Cáceres(MT)
Cáceres(MT)
1,634 VH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Poconé(MT)
2,446
1,138
721
635
430
EH
H
VH
H
EH
Recuperation
Recuperation
Poconé(MT)
Cáceres(MT)
Cáceres(MT)
Santo Antônio do Leverger(MT)
Cáceres(MT)
H
EH
H
H
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation of full protection PA
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation of full protection PA
Other
Fostering sustainable use
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Inventory
Other
Creation of full protection PA
Inventory
Inventory
Creation of full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
205
Pa042
Pa043
Pa044
Pa046
Pa045
Pa047
Pa048
Pa049
Pa050
Glória d'Oeste
Porto Esperidião
Cuiabá lagoas marginais
Proposta - PE do Rio Negro
PE Pantanal do Rio Negro
PN do Pantanal Matogrossense
PE Guirá
PE Encontro das Aguas
ESEC de Taiamã
810
663
578
666
780
1,358
1,031
1,107
143
VH
H
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Creation of full protection PA
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Cáceres(MT)
Cáceres(MT)
Cuiabá(MT)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Cáceres(MT)
Cerrado Biome
Table 11.9.3 – List of Priority Areas for the Cerrado Biome with: area code, size (km2), biological importance (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high, IK –
insufficiently known), urgency for action (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high), main priority action recommended, and main municipality.
Size (km2) Importance Priority Priority Action
Main Municipality
Area code Name
Ce001
Entorno do PARES Guartelá
134
EH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Castro(PR)
Ce002
Piraí do Sul
862
EH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Castro(PR)
Ce003
Boqueirão do Rio Jaguariaíva
30
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Jaguariaíva(PR)
Ce004
Sengés
407
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Itararé(SP)
Ce005
Vale do Codó
170
VH
VH
Creation full protection PA
Jaguariaíva(PR)
Buffer zone and expansion of PE do
44
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Ce006
Jaguariaíva(PR)
Cerrado
Ce007
Itararé
535
EH
VH
Mosaic/Corridor
Itapeva(SP)
Ce008
Nova Campina
13
VH
H
Creation full protection PA
Nova Campina(SP)
Ce009
Itapeva - Nova Campina
86
VH
VH
Creation full protection PA
Itapeva(SP)
Ce011
Capão Bonito-Ce
8
EH
VH
Creation full protection PA
Capão Bonito(SP)
Ce012
Entorno da ESEC de Itaberá
77
H
VH
Mosaic/Corridor
Taquarituba(SP)
Ce013
Itaí
39
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Taquarituba(SP)
Ce014
Lençóis Paulista
595
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Botucatu(SP)
Ce015
Anhembi
855
EH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
Botucatu(SP)
Ce016
Botucatu
54
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Botucatu(SP)
Ce017
Barreiro Rico
47
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Anhembi(SP)
Ce018
São Pedro do Turvo
153
VH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
São Pedro do Turvo(SP)
Campos Novos Paulista(SP)
Ce019
Campos Novos
17
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Ce020
Agudos - Piratininga
447
EH
VH
Mosaic/Corridor
Agudos(SP)
206
Ce021
Ce022
Ce023
Ce024
Ce025
Ce026
Ce027
Ce028
Ce029
Ce030
Ce031
Ce032
Ce033
Ce034
Ce035
Ce036
Ce037
Ce038
São Pedro - Itirapina
Ipeúna - São Pedro
Mogi I e II
Aguapeí IV ( córrego da Onça)
Bauru - Pederneiras
Rancharia
Brotas
São Carlos - Itirapina
Batalha
Dourado - Ribeirão Bonito
Reginópolis
São Carlos
Jacaré-Pepira
Descalvado
Santa Maria - Brilhante
Serra do Amongüijá
Matão
Luís Antônio - Santa Rita
301
55
112
198
33
271
68
244
610
924
22
8
879
1,982
4,849
705
50
803
VH
EH
EH
H
EH
IK
EH
IK
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Ce039
Santa Rita do Passa Quatro
16
EH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Ce040
São Simão
22
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Ce041
Ce042
Ce043
Ce044
Ce045
Ce046
Ce047
Ce048
Ce049
Ce050
Ce051
Ce052
Ce053
Ce054
Serra do Maracaju Corridor
Médio Anhanduí
Planalto da Bodoquena
Altinópolis II
Santo Antônio da Alegria
Batatais II
Batatais
Altinópolis
6,191
10,972
14,342
18
108
55
261
784
660
64
1,247
209
764
5,565
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
IK
VH
IK
EH
IK
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
H
VH
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Expansion of PN Serra da Bodoquena
Área de campos úmidos
Anastácio - Nioaque
Sidrolândia - Terenos
Nascentes do Varadouro
Rio Verde (MS)
Inventory
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Recuperation
Rio Claro(SP)
São Pedro(SP)
Mogi Guaçu(SP)
Paraguaçu Paulista(SP)
Bauru(SP)
Rancharia(SP)
São Carlos(SP)
São Carlos(SP)
Bauru(SP)
São Carlos(SP)
Iacanga(SP)
São Carlos(SP)
Ibitinga(SP)
São Carlos(SP)
Dourados(MS)
Porto Murtinho(MS)
Matão(SP)
São Carlos(SP)
Santa Rita do Passa
Quatro(SP)
Santa Rita do Passa
Quatro(SP)
Ponta Porã(MS)
Campo Grande(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Cajuru(SP)
São Sebastião do Paraíso(MG)
Batatais(SP)
Batatais(SP)
São Sebastião do Paraíso(MG)
Jardim(MS)
Sidrolândia(MS)
Aquidauana(MS)
Campo Grande(MS)
Sidrolândia(MS)
Três Lagoas(MS)
207
Ce055
Ce056
Ce057
Ce058
Ce059
Ce060
Ce061
Ce062
Ce063
Ce064
Ce065
Ce066
Ce067
Ce068
Ce069
Ce070
Ce071
Ce072
Ce073
Ce074
Ce075
Ce076
Ce077
Ce078
Ce079
Ce080
Ce081
Ce082
Ce083
Ce084
Ce085
Ce086
Ce087
Ce088
Ce089
Córrego Agachi
Carste Arcos e Pains
Aquidauana
Pedregulho
Conquista - Canastra
Entorno do PN Serra da Canastra
Lagoas do Rio Uberaba
Jaraguari
Cayman-Agachi
Médio Rio Verde - Ribeirão Salgado
Campo Florido - Veríssimo
Serra do Maracaju
Serra do Salitre - Córrego Danta
Belo Horizonte - Monjolos
Arantes
Paranaíba - Cassilândia
Ituiutaba - Prata
Alto Sucuriú
Aporé
Itarumã - Caçu
Morro da Garça
Itaruma
Espinhaço Meridional
Médio Taquari (Leste)
Nascentes do rio Taquari
Serra Vermelha (MG)
Coromandel
Itumbiara
Corinto - Lassance
Serra dos Alegres
Quirinopolis
Diamantina - Itamarandiba
Gioandira
Davinopolis
Serra do Cabral
498
3,971
646
526
682
6,600
305
1,019
349
574
449
6,969
3,292
10,598
2,451
1,683
1,050
2,912
330
2,873
2,101
1,351
5,832
1,322
24,537
4,437
2,620
1,893
1,063
5,264
1,761
3,017
1,192
910
2,399
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
H
VH
IK
H
H
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
H
VH
H
H
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
H
H
H
H
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
H
VH
VH
H
EH
H
VH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Other
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Inventory
Inventory
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering sustainable use
Recuperation
Recuperation
Aquidauana(MS)
Formiga(MG)
Aquidauana(MS)
Igarapava(SP)
Sacramento(MG)
Araxá(MG)
Guaíra(SP)
Jaraguari(MS)
Aquidauana(MS)
Ribas do Rio Pardo(MS)
Prata(MG)
Aquidauana(MS)
Patrocínio(MG)
Belo Horizonte(MG)
Ituiutaba(MG)
Paranaíba(MS)
Ituiutaba(MG)
Três Lagoas(MS)
Cassilândia(MS)
Quirinópolis(GO)
Curvelo(MG)
Itajá(GO)
Itabira(MG)
Coxim(MS)
Coxim(MS)
Patos de Minas(MG)
Patos de Minas(MG)
Itumbiara(GO)
Várzea da Palma(MG)
João Pinheiro(MG)
Rio Verde(GO)
Diamantina(MG)
Catalão(GO)
Catalão(GO)
Várzea da Palma(MG)
208
Ce090
Ce091
Ce092
Ce093
Ce094
Ce095
Ce096
Ce097
Ce098
Ce099
Ce100
Ce101
Ce102
Ce103
Ce104
Ce105
Ce106
Ce107
Ce108
Ce109
Entorno PN Emas
Olhos d'Água - Bocaiuva
Jataí
Corumbaiba
Vale do Jequitinhonha
Campo Alegre
Rio Verde (Norte)
Alto Taquari
Buritizeiro
Itiquira - Taquari
Jandaia
Alto Araguaia a Caiapônia
Caiapônia
Nascentes do Piquiri
Grão Mogol - Francisco Sá
Brasilândia
Alto - Médio São Francisco
Geoparque Araguainha
Cristalina-Luziania
Fruta de Leite
Ce110
Tereza Cristina
Ce111
Ce112
Ce113
Ce114
Ce115
Ce116
Ce117
Ce118
Ce119
Ce120
Ce121
Ce122
Ce123
Ce124
Guiratinga - Alto Garças
Rondonópolis - Leverger
Unaí
Fazenda Nova
Poxoréu
Baliza - Aragarça
Santo Antônio do Descoberto
áreas entre a RB Sagarana e Ucs
Luiza do Valle
Área Alfa
Nascentes do São Lourenço
Fazenda Sucupira
Espinhaço Setentrional
São João da Ponte
4,078
303
2,999
1,944
10,160
4,432
2,265
3,771
1,320
6,444
1,744
3,251
4,512
1,411
9,446
1,232
6,571
425
5,244
1,556
52
4,563
539
4,056
421
5,445
3,477
1,526
1,274
50
134
4,158
30
1,465
475
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
H
VH
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
H
EH
H
H
H
VH
EH
H
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
H
VH
EH
VH
H
H
H
VH
VH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
H
H
VH
VH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Recuperation
Inventory
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Inventory
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Jataí(GO)
Bocaiúva(MG)
Rio Verde(GO)
Caldas Novas(GO)
Araçuaí(MG)
Paracatu(MG)
Rio Verde(GO)
Mineiros(GO)
Pirapora(MG)
Pedra Preta(MT)
Acreúna(GO)
Mineiros(GO)
Jataí(GO)
Rondonópolis(MT)
Bocaiúva(MG)
João Pinheiro(MG)
Patos de Minas(MG)
Mineiros(GO)
Brasília(DF)
Salinas(MG)
Santo Antônio do
Leverger(MT)
Pedra Preta(MT)
Rondonópolis(MT)
Paracatu(MG)
Fazenda Nova(GO)
Rondonópolis(MT)
Aragarças(GO)
Brasília(DF)
Arinos(MG)
Porteirinha(MG)
Brasília(DF)
Rondonópolis(MT)
Brasília(DF)
Porteirinha(MG)
Janaúba(MG)
209
Ce125
Ce126
Ce127
Ce128
Ce129
Ce130
Ce131
Ce132
Ce133
Ce134
Ce135
Ce136
Ce137
Ce138
Ce139
Ce140
Ce141
Ce142
Ce143
Ce144
Ce145
Ce146
Ce147
Ce148
Ce149
Ce150
Ce151
Ce152
Ce153
Ce154
Ce155
Ce156
Ce157
Ce158
Ce159
Vale do Rio São Bartolomeu
Verdelândia - Varzelândia
Formosa
Serra de São Vicente
Cabeceiras - Buritis
Rio Pardo - Santo Antônio do Retiro
Goiás Velho
Borda do Alto Pantanal
Entorno da Rebio Jaíba
Verdelândia
Descoberto
Arinos - Buritis
Sarandi
Januária
Areião
Porto Estrela - Cáceres
Barra do Garças - Araguaiana
Pirinópolis
Rio Jauquara
Chapada dos Guimarães - Campo
Verde
Buritis
Äreas de entorno das UCs de Peruaçu
Padre Bernardo - Planaltina
Região do Jaíba
Cuiabá - Chapada dos Guimarães
Bonito de Minas
Goianésia a Barro Alto
Carretão I
Chapada dos Guimarães
Terra do boi
Karajá de Aruanã I
Karajá de Aruanã II
Karajá de Aruanã III
Nacente do Rio Guaporé
Niquelândia - Mimoso
591
1,503
1,180
1,303
863
2,053
1,583
5,811
4,244
189
346
3,629
35
2,487
5,258
1,958
6,313
3,398
2,596
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Brasília(DF)
Jaíba(MG)
Brasília(DF)
Cuiabá(MT)
Formosa(GO)
Espinosa(MG)
Goiás(GO)
Cuiabá(MT)
São Francisco(MG)
Jaíba(MG)
Brasília(DF)
Unaí(MG)
Brasília(DF)
Januária(MG)
Espinosa(MG)
Cáceres(MT)
Barra do Garças(MT)
Goianésia(GO)
Cáceres(MT)
1,387
EH
VH
Mosaic/Corridor
Cuiabá(MT)
2,744
4,924
4,696
1,366
1,061
2,084
2,542
17
4,762
2,811
0
9
7
1,391
3,302
H
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
H
H
H
H
H
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
H
H
H
H
H
H
VH
EH
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering sustainable use
Inventory
Formosa(GO)
Januária(MG)
Brasília(DF)
Jaíba(MG)
Cuiabá(MT)
Januária(MG)
Goianésia(GO)
Rubiataba(GO)
Cuiabá(MT)
Rubiataba(GO)
Aruanã(GO)
Cocalinho(MT)
Cocalinho(MT)
Tangará da Serra(MT)
Niquelândia(GO)
Inventory
Creation PA – undefined category
Fostering sustainable use
Inventory
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA – undefined category
210
Ce160
Ce161
Ce162
Ce163
Ce164
Ce165
Ce166
Ce167
Ce168
Ce169
Ce170
Ce171
Ce172
Ce173
Ce174
Ce175
Ce176
Ce177
Ce178
Ce179
Ce180
Ce181
Ce182
Ce183
Ce184
Ce185
Ce186
Ce187
Ce188
Ce189
Ce190
Ce191
Ce192
Ce193
Montalvânia
Flores de Goiás
Pilar de Goias
Província Serrana/APA da
Cabeceira do R. Paraguai
Grande Sertão Veredas-Refugio
Corridor
Serras de Planaltina a Alto Paraíso
Serra do Culuene
Aruanã - Nova Crixás
Serra Geral de Goiás
Niquelândia
Colinas - Niquelândia
Vão do Paranã
Paranatinga - Rosário Oeste
Alto Rio Arinos
Cocalinho
Nascentes do Xingu
Formoso-Amaralina
Paranatinga
Cocos
Minaçu - Colinas - Cavalcante
Novo Mundo
Bacia do Rio Corrente
Monte Alegre - Nova Roma
Cavalcante
Sapezal/ Campos de Julio
Rio Teles Pires
Nascentes do Juruena
Paranã - Arraias
Interflúvio Tocantins-Paranã
Aurora do Tocantins
São Salvador (TO)
Expansion of P. N. Araguaia
Baianópolis - Tabocas do Brejo Velho
Rio das Mortes / São João Grande
4,231
2,433
2,282
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
H
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Fostering sustainable use
Manga(MG)
Formosa(GO)
Uruaçu(GO)
4,513
EH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Barra do Bugres(MT)
6,925
VH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Januária(MG)
8,887
2,173
8,380
3,698
1,878
1,782
10,470
2,059
5,940
18,187
17,155
3,255
6,094
4,536
7,136
888
9,069
3,050
1,095
2,482
2,138
6,766
7,637
4,220
3,668
2,890
1,993
12,250
3,196
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
H
EH
EH
H
VH
VH
H
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
H
H
H
VH
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
Fostering sustainable use
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Planning and regularization
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Planning and regularization
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Fostering sustainable use
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Brasília(DF)
Primavera do Leste(MT)
São Miguel do Araguaia(GO)
Correntina(BA)
Niquelândia(GO)
Niquelândia(GO)
Formosa(GO)
Rosário Oeste(MT)
Diamantino(MT)
São Miguel do Araguaia(GO)
Primavera do Leste(MT)
Uruaçu(GO)
Paranatinga(MT)
Correntina(BA)
Minaçu(GO)
Nova Crixás(GO)
Correntina(BA)
Campos Belos(GO)
Cavalcante(GO)
Campo Novo do Parecis(MT)
Sorriso(MT)
Tangará da Serra(MT)
Campos Belos(GO)
Minaçu(GO)
Correntina(BA)
Minaçu(GO)
São Miguel do Araguaia(GO)
Barreiras(BA)
Ribeirão Cascalheira(MT)
211
Ce194
Ce195
Ce196
Ce197
Ce198
Ce199
Ce200
Ce201
Ce202
Ce203
Ce204
Ce205
Ce206
Ce207
Ce208
Ce209
Ce210
Ce211
Ce212
Ce213
Ce214
Ce215
Ce216
Ce217
Ce218
Ce219
Ce220
Ce221
Ce222
Ce223
Ce224
Ce225
Ce226
Ce227
Ce228
Ribeirão Cascalheira
Terra do Papagaio
Bacia do rio Grande
Rio Papagaio
Pantanal Tocantinense
Conceição do Tocantins
Barra
Ibotirama
Médio São Fracisco
Vale do Rio Palmeiras
peixe angical
Natividade
Dianópolis
Rio Preto (BA)
Itucas do Tocantins
Tapirapé-Urubu Branco Corridor
Lagoa do Paranaguá
Serra de Lajeado
Serra Vermelha (PI)
Rio Caracol
Nascente do Rio Uruçuí-Preto
Lizarda
Dois Irmãos
Bom Jesus
Alto Parnaíba
Burguei
Ribeirão Tranqueira
Baixa Grande do Ribeiro
Ribeiro Gonçalves
Sambaíba-Fragoso
Campos Lindos
Rio Balsas
Uruçuí
Jerumenha
Palmeirante
1,464
3,135
11,124
1,604
2,718
7,050
1
18
9,869
1,147
1,736
6,013
5,467
13,324
15,172
1,141
9,988
4,100
7,635
2,558
9,895
2,725
4,040
2,980
7,352
6,979
9,974
398
3,497
4,523
4,051
3,568
8,150
4,238
2,116
VH
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
H
VH
VH
H
VH
EH
H
VH
EH
H
IK
H
EH
H
H
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
H
EH
VH
H
H
H
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Environmental Education
Environmental Education
Inventory
Creation PA – undefined category
Environmental Education
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Other
Fostering sustainable use
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Inventory
Ribeirão Cascalheira(MT)
Campo Novo do Parecis(MT)
Barreiras(BA)
Campo Novo do Parecis(MT)
Luís Eduardo Magalhães(BA)
Dianópolis(TO)
Muquém de São Francisco(BA)
Ibotirama(BA)
Bom Jesus da Lapa(BA)
Dianópolis(TO)
Peixe(TO)
Dianópolis(TO)
Barreiras(BA)
Santa Rita de Cássia(BA)
Formoso do Araguaia(TO)
Porto Alegre do Norte(MT)
Santa Rita de Cássia(BA)
Palmas(TO)
Pilão Arcado(BA)
Alto Parnaíba(MA)
Corrente(PI)
Balsas(MA)
Miracema do Tocantins(TO)
Bom Jesus(PI)
Balsas(MA)
Canto do Buriti(PI)
Miracema do Tocantins(TO)
Bom Jesus(PI)
Baixa Grande do Ribeiro(PI)
Alto Parnaíba(MA)
Balsas(MA)
Balsas(MA)
Uruçuí(PI)
Floriano(PI)
Goiatins(TO)
212
Ce229
Ce230
Ce231
Ce232
Ce233
Ce234
Ce235
Ce236
Ce237
Ce238
Ce239
Ce240
Ce241
Ce242
Ce243
Ce244
Ce245
CeZc246
CeZc247
CeZc248
CeZc249
CeZc250
CeZc251
Ce252
Ce253
Ce254
Ce255
Ce256
Ce257
Ce258
Ce259
Ce260
Ce261
Ce262
Ce263
Carolina
Croeira
Serra da Cangalha
Wanderlândia
Serra Negra (MA)
Pastos Bons
Barreira Branca
Ananás(TO)
Serra das Alpercatas
Itaguatins
Montes Altos - Querubina
Rio das Flores
Baixo Parnaíba
Cocais Corridor
Timbiras
Luzilândia
Chapadinha
Baías das Canárias
Sul da APA Foz do Rio Preguiças
Expansion of RESEX do Delta
Ilha do Caju
Norte da APA Foz do Rio Preguiças
MA-06
PE do Guartelá
PE do Cerrado
FLONA Capão Bonito
ESEC de Itapeva
ESEC de Itaberá
ESEC de Itaberá
PE de Paranapanema
ESEC Paranapanema
ESEC Angatuba
FLOES Angatuba
ARIE Mata de Santa Genebra
ESEC de Ibicatu
8,672
8,210
206
296
2,339
6,366
187
2,391
4,199
1,352
1,254
1,554
1,689
4,363
6,543
935
11,850
391
41
283
81
174
72
8
4
48
1
3
2
13
6
15
12
0
1
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
H
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
EH
EH
H
VH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
H
H
H
H
H
VH
H
H
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Inventory
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Inventory
Recuperation
Inventory
Creation sustainable use PA
Environmental Education
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Carolina(MA)
Colinas(MA)
Babaçulândia(TO)
Wanderlândia(TO)
Sítio Novo(MA)
Colinas(MA)
São Geraldo do Araguaia(PA)
Tocantinópolis(TO)
Barra do Corda(MA)
Araguatins(TO)
Senador La Rocque(MA)
Presidente Dutra(MA)
Teresina(PI)
Caxias(MA)
Caxias(MA)
Barras(PI)
Chapadinha(MA)
Parnaíba(PI)
Tutóia(MA)
Tutóia(MA)
Araioses(MA)
Tutóia(MA)
Barreirinhas(MA)
Tibagi(PR)
Jaguariaíva(PR)
Capão Bonito(SP)
Itaberá(SP)
Itaberá(SP)
Taquarituba(SP)
Paranapanema(SP)
Paranapanema(SP)
Angatuba(SP)
Angatuba(SP)
Paulínia(SP)
Piracicaba(SP)
213
Ce264
ESEC Santa Barbara
Ce265
Ce266
Ce267
Ce268
Ce269
Ce270
Ce271
Ce272
Ce273
Ce274
Ce275
Ce276
Ce277
Ce278
Ce279
Ce280
Ce281
Ce282
Ce283
Ce284
Ce285
Ce286
Ce287
Ce288
Ce289
Ce290
Ce291
Ce292
Ce293
Ce294
Ce295
Ce296
Ce297
Ce298
ARIE Matão de Cosmópolis
ESEC de Assis
ESEC Mogi Guaçu
REBIO Moji-Guaçu
TI Araribá
ESEC Itirapina
ESEC Bauru
ESEC São Carlos
TI Pirakua
ESEC de Jataí
TI Sucuriy
ESEC Santa Maria
ESEC Ribeirão Preto
FLOES Cajuru
REBIO de Sertãozinho
TI Nioaque
PN da Serra da Bodoquena
REBIO Barra
TI Buriti
TI Kadiwéu
TI Lalima
ESEC Corumbá
PN da Serra da Canastra
PE Prosa
PE Matas do Segredo
PE das Furnas do Bom Jesus
TI Limão Verde
TI Nossa Senhora de Fátima
TI Taunay-Ipegue
A.P.E.E. Bacia Vargem das Flores
TI Cachoeirinha
A.P.E.E. Córrego Feio e Fundo
PN da Serra do Cipó
APA Morro da Pedreira
32
EH
H
Protected Area
2
13
10
4
19
27
3
1
24
50
5
1
2
21
23
30
771
4
172
5,345
29
3
1,993
1
0
22
54
0
339
1
363
241
321
1,016
EH
EH
EH
EH
IK
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
H
H
EH
EH
H
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
H
H
H
H
H
EH
EH
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
VH
H
H
VH
H
VH
EH
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Águas de Santa
Bárbara(SP)
Cosmópolis(SP)
Assis(SP)
Mogi Guaçu(SP)
Mogi Guaçu(SP)
Avaí(SP)
Brotas(SP)
Bauru(SP)
Brotas(SP)
Ponta Porã(MS)
São Carlos(SP)
Maracaju(MS)
São Simão(SP)
Ribeirão Preto(SP)
Cajuru(SP)
Sertãozinho(SP)
Nioaque(MS)
Jardim(MS)
São Sebastião do Paraíso(MG)
Sidrolândia(MS)
Corumbá(MS)
Miranda(MS)
Arcos(MG)
Sacramento(MG)
Campo Grande(MS)
Campo Grande(MS)
Pedregulho(SP)
Aquidauana(MS)
Aquidauana(MS)
Aquidauana(MS)
Contagem(MG)
Aquidauana(MS)
Araxá(MG)
Itabira(MG)
Itabira(MG)
214
Ce299
Ce300
Ce301
Ce302
Ce303
Ce304
Ce305
Ce306
Ce307
Ce308
Ce309
Ce310
Ce311
Ce312
Ce314
CeZc315
Ce316
Ce317
Ce318
Ce319
Ce320
Ce321
Ce322
Ce323
Ce324
Ce325
Ce326
Ce327
Ce328
FLONA de Paraopeba
A.P.E.E. Córrego Confusão
ESEC de Pirapitinga
PE Rio Preto
PE Biribiri
PE Serra Negra
PN das Emas
PE Nascentes do Rio Taquari
A.P.E.E. Gruta Lapa Nova
PN das Sempre-Vivas
PE da Serra de Caldas Novas
PE Sonora 2
PE Sonora 1
ESEC Acauã
A.P.E.E. Córrego Espanha e
Ribeirão S. Izabel
PE de Paraúna
PN dos Lençois Maranhenses
PE Grao-Mogol
FLONA de Silvânia
PE Dom Osorio Stoffel
PE Altamiro de Moura Pacheco
TI Tadarimana
REBIO Sagarana \ Moinho
REBIO Sagarana \ Mata Seca
REBIO Sagarana \ Logradouro
REBIO Sagarana \ Barra
TI Jarudore
PE Rio Pardo
RESEC do Gama
PE Serra Dourada
Ce329
PE de Águas Quentes
24
EH
H
Protected Area
Ce330
Ce331
Ce332
ARIE Capetinga-Taquara
RESEC do IBGE
ARIE da Granja do Ipê
22
13
12
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Ce313
2
174
14
102
176
142
1,327
305
9
1,260
122
52
27
66
H
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
H
H
H
VH
VH
H
EH
H
EH
H
VH
VH
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Paraopeba(MG)
São Gotardo(MG)
595
VH
H
Protected Area
Paracatu(MG)
15
1,389
355
5
64
36
95
1
95
64
13
48
0
1
287
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
H
VH
H
EH
H
H
EH
H
H
H
H
EH
VH
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Paraúna(GO)
Barreirinhas(MA)
Grão Mogol(MG)
Silvânia(GO)
Rondonópolis(MT)
Goiânia(GO)
Rondonópolis(MT)
Riachinho(MG)
Arinos(MG)
Arinos(MG)
Arinos(MG)
Poxoréo(MT)
Porteirinha(MG)
Brasília(DF)
Goiás(GO)
Santo Antônio do
Leverger(MT)
Brasília(DF)
Brasília(DF)
Brasília(DF)
Morada Nova de Minas(MG)
Felício dos Santos(MG)
Diamantina(MG)
Itamarandiba(MG)
Mineiros(GO)
Costa Rica(MS)
Vazante(MG)
Diamantina(MG)
Caldas Novas(GO)
Sonora(MS)
Sonora(MS)
Turmalina(MG)
215
Ce333
Ce334
Ce335
Ce336
Ce337
Ce338
Ce339
Ce340
Ce341
Ce342
Ce343
Ce344
Ce345
Ce346
Ce347
Ce348
Ce349
Ce350
Ce351
Ce352
Ce353
Ce354
Ce355
Ce356
Ce357
Ce358
Ce359
Ce360
Ce361
Ce362
Ce363
Ce364
Ce365
Ce366
Ce367
ESEC do Jardim Botânico de Brasília
ARIE Cerradão
ARIE Riacho Fundo
FLONA de Brasília
ARIE do Bosque
RESEC do Guará
ARIE Paranoá Sul
PE dos Pirineus
PE Veredas do Acari
ARIE JK
PN de Brasília
REBIO da Contagem
ESEC Serra das Araras
ARIE Águas de São João
ESEC de Aguas Emendadas
PE Massairo Okamura 2
ESEC Rio da Casca 1
PE Massairo Okamura 1
PE Massairo Okamura 3
ESEC Rio da Casca 2
PE Serra das Araras
TI Merure
REBIO Serra Azul
PN da Chapada dos Guimarães
PE Lagoa do Cajueiro
PN Grande Sertão Veredas
TI São Marcos - MT
PE Veredas do Peruaçú
TI Xakriabá Rancharia
TI Xacriabá
PE Verde Grande
TI Figueiras
TI Chão Preto
PE Gruta da Lagoa Azul
TI Ubawawe
50
1
5
26
0
2
1
28
594
94
320
35
297
0
96
1
2
1
1
30
137
828
75
327
0
2,331
1,733
287
64
468
262
99
127
5
519
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
H
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
VH
VH
H
VH
H
H
H
H
H
VH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
H
H
EH
H
H
EH
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Brasília(DF)
Brasília(DF)
Brasília(DF)
Brasília(DF)
Brasília(DF)
Brasília(DF)
Brasília(DF)
Pirenópolis(GO)
São Francisco(MG)
Brasília(DF)
Brasília(DF)
Brasília(DF)
Cáceres(MT)
Goiás(GO)
Brasília(DF)
Cuiabá(MT)
Campo Verde(MT)
Cuiabá(MT)
Cuiabá(MT)
Cuiabá(MT)
Januária(MG)
Barra do Garças(MT)
Jaíba(MG)
Cuiabá(MT)
Matias Cardoso(MG)
Januária(MG)
Barra do Garças(MT)
Januária(MG)
Itacarambi(MG)
Januária(MG)
Malhada(BA)
Tangará da Serra(MT)
Campinápolis(MT)
Nobres(MT)
Paranatinga(MT)
216
Ce368
Ce369
Ce370
Ce371
Ce372
Ce373
Ce374
Ce375
Ce376
Ce377
Ce378
Ce379
Ce380
Ce381
Ce382
Ce383
Ce384
Ce385
Ce386
Ce387
Ce388
Ce389
Ce390
Ce391
Ce392
Ce393
Ce394
Ce395
Ce396
Ce397
Ce398
Ce399
Ce400
Ce401
Ce402
TI Rio Formoso
TI Juininha
APA Nascentes do rio Cuiabá
TI Areões
TI Parabubure
PE Águas do Cuiabá
TI Paresi
RVS das Veredas do Oeste Baiano
TI Santana
PN da Chapada dos Veadeiros
TI Marechal Rondon
TI Ava-Canoeiro
REBIO Culuene
PE de Terra Ronca
TI Utiariti
TI Pimentel Barbosa
RVS Quelonios do Araguaia
TI Tirecatinga
FLOES do Araguaia
TI Nambikwara
RVS Corixão da Mata Azul
TI Pirineus de Souza
PE Araguaia 2
TI Enawenê-Nawê
TI Menku
APA Estadual do Rio de Janeiro
PN do Araguaia
TI Cacique Fontoura
TI São Domingos - MT
ESEC Rio Preto
RESEX Retireiros do Araguaia
ESEC Serra Geral do Tocantins
TI Inawebohona
TI Tapirapé/Karajá
PE do Jalapão
197
706
4,241
1,804
2,250
110
5,639
1,295
358
652
1,001
389
36
575
4,106
3,279
792
1,309
122
10,145
338
258
2,216
7,488
451
575
13,622
321
59
2,165
674
7,213
3,782
662
1,602
H
H
VH
H
H
H
H
EH
H
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
H
EH
H
H
H
EH
IK
IK
EH
VH
EH
H
IK
EH
H
H
VH
H
H
H
H
EH
H
H
H
H
VH
VH
H
H
VH
H
H
H
VH
H
VH
H
H
VH
H
H
H
VH
H
EH
H
H
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Tangará da Serra(MT)
Tangará da Serra(MT)
Rosário Oeste(MT)
Nova Xavantina(MT)
Nova Xavantina(MT)
Rosário Oeste(MT)
Tangará da Serra(MT)
Cocos(BA)
Nobres(MT)
Cavalcante(GO)
Paranatinga(MT)
Niquelândia(GO)
Paranatinga(MT)
São Domingos(GO)
Campo Novo do Parecis(MT)
Canarana(MT)
Canarana(MT)
Campo Novo do Parecis(MT)
São Miguel do Araguaia(GO)
Juína(MT)
Cocalinho(MT)
Comodoro(MT)
Formoso do Araguaia(TO)
Juína(MT)
Brasnorte(MT)
Barreiras(BA)
São Miguel do Araguaia(GO)
São Félix do Araguaia(MT)
São Félix do Araguaia(MT)
Santa Rita de Cássia(BA)
Luciára(MT)
Formosa do Rio Preto(BA)
Lagoa da Confusão(TO)
Santa Terezinha(MT)
Mateiros(TO)
217
Ce403
Ce404
Ce405
Ce406
Ce407
Ce408
Ce409
Ce410
Ce411
Ce412
Ce413
Ce414
Ce415
Ce416
Ce417
Ce418
Ce419
Ce420
Ce421
Ce422
Ce423
Ce424
Ce425
Ce426
Ce427
Ce428
CeZc429
CeZc430
CeZc431
CeZc432
APA do Jalapão
APA Lago de Palmas
PN do Araguaia
PE do Lajeado
PN Nascentes do Parnaíba
TI Funil
PE do Cantão
APA Ilha do Bananal - Cantão
TI Xerente
PN da Serra das Confusões
ESEC de Uruçui - Una
TI Kraolandia
M.N. das Árvores Fossilizada do Est
de TO
PN Chapada das Mesas
PE do Mirador
TI Porquinhos
TI Apinayé
TI Kanela
TI Krikati
TI Bacurizinho
TI Rodeador
TI Cana Brava/Guajajara
RESEX Mata Grande
TI Urucú-Juruá
TI Lagoa Comprida
RESEX Extremo Norte do Estado do
Tocantins
RESEX Lago da Taboa
APA Foz do Rio Preguiças/Peq.Lençóis
RESEX Marinha do Delta do Parnaíba
APA Foz do Rio Preguiças
3,426
3,510
1,834
108
7,372
159
995
14,746
1,661
5,326
2,058
3,078
EH
IK
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
H
H
VH
H
EH
VH
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Formosa do Rio Preto(BA)
Porto Nacional(TO)
Santa Terezinha(MT)
Palmas(TO)
Corrente(PI)
Miracema do Tocantins(TO)
Santana do Araguaia(PA)
Conceição do Araguaia(PA)
Pedro Afonso(TO)
Canto do Buriti(PI)
Bom Jesus(PI)
Goiatins(TO)
294
EH
H
Protected Area
Filadélfia(TO)
1,611
5,851
803
1,440
1,271
1,462
835
23
1,370
130
129
136
EH
EH
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
EH
VH
EH
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
EH
H
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Carolina(MA)
Tuntum(MA)
Barra do Corda(MA)
Tocantinópolis(TO)
Barra do Corda(MA)
H
EH
Protected Area
Buriti do Tocantins(TO)
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Barreirinhas(MA)
Barreirinhas(MA)
Araioses(MA)
Paulino Neves(MA)
92
157
1,101
276
45
Amarante do Maranhão(MA)
Barra do Corda(MA)
Barra do Corda(MA)
Barra do Corda(MA)
Imperatriz(MA)
Grajaú(MA)
Jenipapo dos Vieiras(MA)
Caatinga Biome
218
Table 11.9.4 – List of Priority Areas for the Caatinga Biome with: area code, size (km2), biological importance (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high, IK –
insufficiently known), urgency for action (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high), main priority action recommended, and main municipality.
Size (km2) Importance Priority Priority Action
Main Municipality
Area code Name
Ca001
Jaíba
9,194
EH
VH
Inventory
Janaúba(MG)
Ca002
Jacaraci
8,561
IK
EH
Recuperation
Caetité(BA)
Ca003
Rio Japoré Corridor
2,511
EH
H
Other
Jaíba(MG)
Ca004
Guanambi
1,015
IK
VH
Fostering sustainable use
Guanambi(BA)
Ca005
Manoel Vitorino
117
IK
H
Inventory
Manoel Vitorino(BA)
Ca006
Lagoa Real
816
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Caetité(BA)
Ca007
Contendas do Sincorá
725
IK
VH
Mosaic/Corridor
Barra da Estiva(BA)
Ca008
Igaporá
457
IK
H
Recuperation
Caetité(BA)
Ca009
Serra do Barbado
2,538
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Brumado(BA)
Ca010
Riacho de Santana
1,652
IK
VH
Creation PA – undefined category
Bom Jesus da Lapa(BA)
Ca011
Ibicoara
572
IK
EH
Recuperation
Barra da Estiva(BA)
Ca012
Itaeté Iramaia
2,323
EH
EH
Recuperation
Jequié(BA)
Ca013
Maracás
488
EH
EH
Fostering sustainable use
Maracás(BA)
Ca014
Bom Jesus da Lapa
2,656
IK
EH
Recuperation
Bom Jesus da Lapa(BA)
Livramento de Nossa
Ca015
Paramirim
3,710
H
H
Recuperation
Senhora(BA)
Ca016
Serra da Jibóia
1,473
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Amargosa(BA)
Ca017
Andaraí Mucugê
811
EH
EH
Recuperation
Andaraí(BA)
Ca018
Milagres
949
VH
EH
Recuperation
Ipirá(BA)
Ca019
Oliveira dos Brejinhos
6,274
IK
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Bom Jesus da Lapa(BA)
Ca020
Marimbus/Iraquara
1,716
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Seabra(BA)
Ca021
Orobó
10,833
VH
VH
Recuperation
Feira de Santana(BA)
Ca022
Dois Riachos
733
IK
H
Inventory
Seabra(BA)
Ca023
Região Morro do Chapéu
5,689
EH
H
Mosaic/Corridor
Morro do Chapéu(BA)
Ca024
Serra de Brotas de Macaúbas
3,947
IK
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Xique-Xique(BA)
Ca025
MONA Cachoeira do Ferro Doido
4
EH
EH
Recuperation
Morro do Chapéu(BA)
Ca026
Nova Soure
141
IK
H
Other
Nova Soure(BA)
Ca027
Polígono do Sisal
3,123
H
VH
Recuperation
Jacobina(BA)
Ca028
Serra de Jacobina
5,699
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Jacobina(BA)
Ca029
Gentío do Ouro
10,961
EH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Xique-Xique(BA)
Ca030
Serra do Tombador
2,112
H
H
Recuperation
Jacobina(BA)
Ca031
Serra Negra (SE)
417
IK
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Lagarto(SE)
Ca032
Queimadinha
87
IK
H
Mosaic/Corridor
Queimadas(BA)
219
Ca033
Ca034
Ca035
Ca036
Ca037
Ca038
Ca039
Ca040
Ca041
Ca042
CaZc043
Ca044
Ca045
Ca046
Ca047
Ca048
Ca049
Ca050
Ca051
Ca052
Ca053
Ca054
Ca055
Ca056
Ca057
Ca058
Ca059
Ca060
Ca061
Ca062
Ca063
Ca064
Ca065
Ca066
Ca067
Brejões Corridor
Filadelfia
Tucano (BA)
Serra de Pitiúba
Umburanas
Caminho de Lampião
Guigó de Coimbra
Arara-azul-de-lear
Nascentes do Rio Piauí
Boqueirão(BA)
Região de Olho d'água Grande
Monte Santo/Canudos
Entorno da ESEC Raso da Catarina
Xingó
Região da Carrancas
Vereda Pimenteira
Riacho Grande
Pilão Arcado
Área de Remanso
Região de Senador Rui Palmeira
Rio Curaçá e Serras
Calha do Rio São Francisco
Nascentes do Riacho do Mel
Riacho do Fundo
Petrolândia
Casa Nova
São Raimundo Nonato
Rodelas
Rio Moxotó
Baxio da Melância
Pesqueira
Petrolina
Floresta
Entorno da ReBio Serra Negra
Capivara/Confusões Corridor
1,699
1,419
1,004
149
685
1,815
1,603
2,574
633
17,188
674
3,361
3,199
3,427
3,199
3,579
224
4,226
467
188
3,091
3,992
327
985
955
7,452
7,252
414
844
2,732
1,209
4,548
1,250
140
4,769
EH
H
IK
IK
H
IK
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
H
EH
VH
H
H
H
VH
H
VH
EH
H
EH
H
VH
H
EH
VH
H
H
EH
H
H
E
EH
H
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Inventory
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Other
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Recuperation
Other
Recuperation
Recuperation
Other
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Other
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Morro do Chapéu(BA)
Itiúba(BA)
Euclides da Cunha(BA)
Itiúba(BA)
Ourolândia(BA)
Simão Dias(SE)
Nossa Senhora da Glória(SE)
Monte Santo(BA)
Penedo(AL)
Petrolina(PE)
Girau do Ponciano(AL)
Monte Santo(BA)
Paulo Afonso(BA)
Paulo Afonso(BA)
Petrolina(PE)
Remanso(BA)
São José da Tapera(AL)
Remanso(BA)
Casa Nova(BA)
Santana do Ipanema(AL)
Juazeiro(BA)
Petrolina(PE)
Canapi(AL)
Curaçá(BA)
Petrolândia(PE)
Petrolina(PE)
Casa Nova(BA)
Macururé(BA)
Ibimirim(PE)
Santa Maria da Boa Vista(PE)
Pesqueira(PE)
Petrolina(PE)
Petrolândia(PE)
Petrolândia(PE)
São Raimundo Nonato(PI)
220
Ca068
Ca069
Ca070
Ca071
Ca072
Ca073
Ca074
Ca075
Ca076
Ca077
Ca078
Ca079
Ca080
Ca081
Ca082
Ca083
Ca084
Ca085
Ca086
Ca087
Ca088
Ca089
Ca090
Ca091
Ca092
Ca093
Ca094
Ca095
Ca096
Ca097
Ca098
Ca099
Ca100
Ca101
Ca102
Riacho do Mansinho
Brejo dos Cavalos
Caboclo
Serra do Arapuá
Serra do Capim
Brejo da Madre de Deus
Custódia
Serra Negra de Bezerros
Comunidade Quilombola de
Conceição das Crioulas
Cabeceiras do Capibaribe
Ouricuri
Cabrobó
São João do Tigre
Brejo de Taquaritinga
Sertânia
Brejo da Princesa
Brejos de Natuba
Núcleo central da caatinga piauiense
Cabaceiras
Serra do Cariri
Araripe
Curral Velho
Conceição
Cariris Velho/Sumé
Juru
Chapada do Araripe (Leste)
Fagundes
Flores do Piauí
Tamanduá
Vale do Itaueira/Gurguéia
Piranhas
Juaseirinho
Kariris
Brejo
Algodão de Jandaíra
255
171
6,738
1,440
1,401
292
2,484
92
IK
EH
VH
H
H
EH
H
EH
H
EH
VH
H
H
EH
H
VH
Inventory
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Fostering sustainable use
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Casa Nova(BA)
Caruaru(PE)
Petrolina(PE)
Serra Talhada(PE)
Serra Talhada(PE)
Belo Jardim(PE)
Sertânia(PE)
Gravatá(PE)
290
VH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Salgueiro(PE)
5,936
3,142
4,095
1,041
445
590
606
331
19,687
2,810
2,755
2,328
1,081
412
608
882
780
1,904
1,066
760
6,493
1,509
966
2,202
1,351
729
EH
H
VH
VH
EH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
H
VH
EH
EH
H
VH
VH
VH
EH
H
EH
VH
H
H
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
H
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Fostering sustainable use
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Caruaru(PE)
Araripina(PE)
Ouricuri(PE)
Arcoverde(PE)
Caruaru(PE)
Sertânia(PE)
Serra Talhada(PE)
Bom Jardim(PE)
Oeiras(PI)
Campina Grande(PB)
Serra Talhada(PE)
Paulistana(PI)
Itaporanga(PB)
Mauriti(CE)
São José do Egito(PE)
Tavares(PB)
Crato(CE)
Campina Grande(PB)
Itaueira(PI)
Teixeira(PB)
Floriano(PI)
Cajazeiras(PB)
Juazeirinho(PB)
Juazeiro do Norte(CE)
Guarabira(PB)
Esperança(PB)
221
Ca103
Ca104
Ca105
Ca106
Ca107
Ca108
Ca109
Ca110
Ca111
Ca112
Ca113
Ca114
Ca115
Ca116
Ca117
Ca118
Ca119
Ca120
Ca121
Ca122
Ca123
Ca124
Ca125
Ca126
Ca127
Ca128
Ca129
Ca130
Ca131
Ca132
Ca133
Ca134
Ca135
Ca136
Ca137
Região de Picos
Parelhas
Lavras do Mangabeira
Bananeiras
Vista Serrana
Englobou o CE31 - AIUABA
Avuante
Sousa
Estação Ecológica de Seridó
Cariús
Curimataú Oriental
Chapada Grande
Pereiro-de-tinta
Acari
Brejo do Cruz
Santarém
Pimenteiras (PI)
Tangará
Tauá
São Tomé
Orós
Acopiara
Martins
Ererê
Jaguaribe
Ilhas do Castanhão
Serra da Micaela
Lages
Médio Parnaíba
Nascente do Rio Jucá
Pedro Avelino
Caraúbas
Monsenhor Gil
Castelo do Piauí
Pureza
3,897
940
1,276
907
721
2,442
76
705
12
748
318
2,769
1,348
793
321
2,480
3,932
1,274
2,434
2,108
458
1,590
970
538
669
701
322
779
7,533
344
930
1,997
3,228
5,725
359
H
IK
H
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
IK
IK
VH
VH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
VH
VH
H
VH
H
H
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
H
VH
H
VH
VH
Creation PA – undefined category
Inventory
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Recuperation
Other
Creation full protection PA
Inventory
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Creation PA – undefined category
Fostering sustainable use
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Picos(PI)
Parelhas(RN)
Várzea Alegre(CE)
Guarabira(PB)
Paulista(PB)
Parambu(CE)
Aiuaba(CE)
Sousa(PB)
Serra Negra do Norte(RN)
Iguatu(CE)
Cacimba de Dentro(PB)
Oeiras(PI)
Parambu(CE)
Currais Novos(RN)
Catolé do Rocha(PB)
Icó(CE)
São Miguel do Tapuio(PI)
Macaíba(RN)
Tauá(CE)
Currais Novos(RN)
Icó(CE)
Iguatu(CE)
Pau dos Ferros(RN)
Pau dos Ferros(RN)
Jaguaribe(CE)
Jaguaribe(CE)
Jaguaribe(CE)
Cerro Corá(RN)
Teresina(PI)
Tauá(CE)
Santana do Matos(RN)
Apodi(RN)
Demerval Lobão(PI)
São Miguel do Tapuio(PI)
Touros(RN)
222
Ca138
CaZc139
Ca140
Ca141
Ca142
CaZc143
Ca144
CaZc145
CaZc146
CaZc147
Ca148
Ca149
CaZc150
CaZc151
Ca152
CaZc153
Ca154
Ca155
Ca156
Ca157
Ca158
Ca159
Ca160
Ca161
Ca162
Ca163
CaZc164
CaZc165
Ca166
Ca167
Ca168
Ca169
CaZc170
Monte Nebo
Açu
Pedra Branca (CE)
João Câmara
Faveleira
São Miguel (RN)
Carnaúba
Complexo estuarino Porto do
Mangue-Macau
Complexo estuarino do Amaré-Galinhos
Tabuleiros de Caiçara do Norte
Reserva Natural Serra das Almas RPPNs
Serra do Estevão
Ponta do Mel/Dunas do Rosado
Estuário do Rio Mossoró
Crateús
Plataforma interna do Rio Grande
do Norte
São Joaquim
Campo Maior
Mulungu
Icapuí
Alto Poty
Sítio Olho D'água
Fazenda Belém Fauna Corridor
Poranga
Pau branco
Tatajuba
Litoral Icapui/Aracati
Estuário do Rio Jaguaribe
Serra do Machado/Serra das Matas
Cocal de Telha
Complexo Boqueirão
Piranjí
Estuário do Rio Pirangi
4,942
5,084
3,570
1,598
824
76
813
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
H
H
EH
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Crateús(CE)
Mossoró(RN)
Quixeramobim(CE)
João Câmara(RN)
Tauá(CE)
Touros(RN)
Morada Nova(CE)
481
EH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Macau(RN)
371
147
EH
H
EH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Macau(RN)
São Miguel do Gostoso(RN)
62
EH
H
Other
Crateús(CE)
1,270
137
330
2,663
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Quixadá(CE)
Areia Branca(RN)
Mossoró(RN)
Crateús(CE)
5,339
VH
VH
Creation full protection PA
Touros(RN)
464
538
327
836
2,744
146
20
1,469
253
1,306
2,390
538
1,835
441
302
377
376
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
IK
IK
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
H
VH
H
H
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
EH
H
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Other
Other
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Planning and regularization
Creation full protection PA
Quixeramobim(CE)
Campo Maior(PI)
Russas(CE)
Aracati(CE)
Crateús(CE)
Aracati(CE)
Aracati(CE)
Crateús(CE)
Quixadá(CE)
Ipu(CE)
Aracati(CE)
Aracati(CE)
Canindé(CE)
Piripiri(PI)
Capitão de Campos(PI)
Cascavel(CE)
Beberibe(CE)
223
Ca171
Ca172
CaZc173
Ca174
Ca175
Ca176
Ca177
CaZc178
Ca179
Ca180
Ca181
CaZc182
Região da Puba
Aracoiaba
Beberibe
Cariri
Maciço de Baturité
Carnaubal
Xinuaquê
Litoral Beberibe-Cascavel
Gruta dos Morcegos
Pacoti
Serra da Aratânia
Plataforma Interna Costa leste do Ceará
Ca184
Ca185
CaZc186
Ca187
Ca188
Ca189
Ca190
CaZc191
Ca192
Ca193
CaZc194
Ca195
CaZc196
Ca197
CaZc198
Serras de Maranguape-Aratânia
Ecological Corridor
Cocais 2
Serra de Maranguape
Estuário dos rios Pacoti/Cocó
Serra das Vertentes
Serra do Juá
Serra da Ibiapaba
Lagoas do Baixo Parnaíba
Estuário Rio Ceará
P. Bot. do Ceará
Frecheirinha
Lagamar e Dunas do Cauípe
Serra de Uruburetama
Enseada do Mucuripe
Serra da Meruoca
Pecém
CaZc199
Bacia do Siupé
Ca200
Ca201
Ca202
CaZc203
CaZc204
Mundaú
Acaraú
Cruxatí
Litoral Trairi/Paracuru
Área Recifal Paracuru/Trairi
Ca183
227
1,548
651
877
979
514
1,690
428
572
1,183
197
3,150
27
963
88
328
477
2,243
4,439
4,670
44
2
255
73
775
649
568
96
50
442
1,968
643
306
263
H
VH
VH
H
EH
H
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
H
H
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
H
H
EH
H
H
H
EH
VH
VH
H
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Inventory
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Recuperation
Fisheries Planning and regularization
José de Freitas(PI)
Maranguape(CE)
Cascavel(CE)
Piripiri(PI)
Maranguape(CE)
São Benedito(CE)
Sobral(CE)
Aquiraz(CE)
Ipu(CE)
Fortaleza(CE)
Maracanaú(CE)
Fortaleza(CE)
Mosaic/Corridor
Maracanaú(CE)
H
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
VH
VH
H
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
IK
VH
Inventory
H
H
H
H
VH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Recuperation
Barras(PI)
Caucaia(CE)
Fortaleza(CE)
Itapagé(CE)
Caucaia(CE)
Tianguá(CE)
Barras(PI)
Fortaleza(CE)
Caucaia(CE)
Tianguá(CE)
Caucaia(CE)
Itapipoca(CE)
Fortaleza(CE)
Sobral(CE)
Caucaia(CE)
São Gonçalo do
Amarante(CE)
Itapipoca(CE)
Sobral(CE)
Itapipoca(CE)
Trairi(CE)
Paracuru(CE)
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering sustainable use
Fostering sustainable use
Creation PA – undefined category
Other
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA – undefined category
224
Ca205
CaZc206
CaZc207
CaZc208
CaZc209
CaZc210
CaZc211
CaZc218
CaZc219
CaZc220
Ca221
Ca222
Ca223
Ca224
Ca225
Ca226
Ca227
Ca228
Ca229
Guaribas
Estuário do rio Mundaú
Dunas de Caetanos
Baixo Parnaíba (Delta)
Estuário do Aracati-Açú
Sul da APA Foz do Rio Preguiças
RVS Peixe-boi marinho
Lagoas Costeiras de Camocim
(leste)
Lagoas Costeiras de Camocim
Oeste
Litoral de Barroquinha
Estuário do Coreaú
Lagoas costeiras de Acaraú e Jijoca
Plataforma Interna Costa Oeste do
Ceará
Complexo estuarino de Itarema
Estuário do Rio Timonha
Estuário do Rio Acaraú
PE Rio Pardo
PN Cavernas do Peruaçu
REBIO Jaíba
PE Lagoa do Cajueiro
PE Mata Seca
FLONA Contendas do Sincorá
ARIE do Rio de Contas
PN da Chapada Diamantina
ARIE da Serra do Orobó
Ca230
TI Barra
Ca231
Ca232
Ca233
Ca234
Ca235
Ca236
TI Ibotirama
PE das Sete Passagens
PE Morro do Chapéu
TI Kiriri
TI Massacara
APA Dunas e Veredas do Bx e Md
CaZc212
CaZc213
CaZc214
CaZc215
CaZc216
CaZc217
2,440
169
192
1,714
679
66
234
EH
VH
IK
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
H
VH
EH
Inventory
Creation full protection PA
Planning and regularization
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Camocim(CE)
Itapipoca(CE)
Itapipoca(CE)
Parnaíba(PI)
Amontada(CE)
Parnaíba(PI)
Luís Correia(PI)
516
IK
VH
Inventory
Camocim(CE)
268
IK
VH
Creation PA – undefined category
Camocim(CE)
390
359
208
VH
VH
IK
EH
VH
H
Inventory
Camocim(CE)
Camocim(CE)
Acaraú(CE)
8,773
H
H
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Acaraú(CE)
947
447
458
129
572
54
215
105
115
49
1,532
76
EH
EH
VH
EH
IK
EH
EH
EH
IK
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
H
H
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
IK
H
Protected Area
IK
EH
EH
IK
IK
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
1
21
29
497
127
83
11,147
Creation full protection PA
Acaraú(CE)
Barroquinha(CE)
Acaraú(CE)
Porteirinha(MG)
Januária(MG)
Jaíba(MG)
Itacarambi(MG)
Manga(MG)
Tanhaçu(BA)
Piatã(BA)
Ibicoara(BA)
Itaberaba(BA)
Muquém de São
Francisco(BA)
Ibotirama(BA)
Miguel Calmon(BA)
Morro do Chapéu(BA)
Tucano(BA)
Euclides da Cunha(BA)
Xique-Xique(BA)
225
Ca237
Ca238
Ca239
Ca240
Ca241
Ca242
Ca243
Ca244
Ca245
Ca246
Ca247
Ca249
Ca250
Ca251
Ca252
Ca253
Ca254
Ca255
Ca256
Ca257
Ca258
Ca259
Ca260
Ca261
Ca262
Ca263
Ca264
Ca265
Ca266
Ca267
Ca268
S. Francisco
TI Kariri-Xocó
TI Aconã
ARIE Cocorobó
ESEC Raso da Catarina
TI Fazenda Canto
TI Mata da Cafurna
TI Pankararé
TI Jeripancó
TI Fulni-ô
TI Kantaruré
TI Pankararu
TI Kambiwá
REBIO de Serra Negra
TI Kapinawá
PN da Serra da Capivara
PN do Catimbau
TI Truka
TI Xukuru
TI Atikum
APA Araripe - Santa Filomena
APA Chapada do Araripe - Catolé
APA Chapada do Araripe - Sul
APA Chapada do Araripe - Enclaves
APA Chapada do Araripe - Araripe
oriental
APA Chapada do Araripe - Oeste
FLONA Araripe-Apoide
APA Chapada do Araripe Soldadinho do Araripe
APA Chapada do Araripe - Gruta
das onças
APA Chapada do Araripe - Cacique
Araripe
APA Chapada do Araripe - Kariri-Oeste
ESEC de Aiuaba
46
3
77
1,086
3
1
492
7
120
19
165
327
6
129
936
649
45
290
169
384
503
2,830
543
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
H
EH
VH
VH
IK
EH
H
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
H
H
VH
H
H
VH
H
H
EH
H
H
EH
H
H
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Porto Real do Colégio(AL)
Traipu(AL)
Jeremoabo(BA)
Paulo Afonso(BA)
Palmeira dos Índios(AL)
Palmeira dos Índios(AL)
Paulo Afonso(BA)
Pariconha(AL)
Águas Belas(PE)
Glória(BA)
Petrolândia(PE)
Floresta(PE)
Floresta(PE)
Buíque(PE)
São Raimundo Nonato(PI)
Buíque(PE)
Cabrobó(PE)
Pesqueira(PE)
Salgueiro(PE)
Araripina(PE)
Brejo Santo(CE)
Crato(CE)
Araripina(PE)
364
EH
VH
Protected Area
Exu(PE)
1,523
395
EH
EH
EH
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Araripina(PE)
Crato(CE)
919
EH
EH
Protected Area
Crato(CE)
994
H
VH
Protected Area
Araripe(CE)
343
VH
VH
Protected Area
Exu(PE)
817
121
VH
EH
VH
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Campos Sales(CE)
Aiuaba(CE)
226
Ca269
Ca270
Ca271
CaZc272
Ca273
CaZc274
CaZc275
CaZc276
CaZc277
Ca278
Ca279
Ca280
CaZc281
Ca282
CaZc283
CaZc284
CaZc285
CaZc288
Ca289
CaZc290
CaZc291
CaZc292
CaZc293
CaZc294
CaZc295
ESEC do Castanhão
APA Serra da Ibiapaba - Rio
Parafuso
Nascentes do Rio dos Matos
APA da Lagoa de Uruaú
Parque Nacional de Sete Cidades
TI Genipapo Canindé (não
reconhecida)
RESEX do Batoque
APA do Rio Pacoti
PE do Rio Cocó
FLONA Sobral
Carrasco da Ibiapaba
PN de Ubajara
APA do Estuário do Rio Ceará
Cocais
PE Marinho da Pedra da Risca do Meio
ESEC do Pecém
APA do Pecém
APA das Dunas da Lagoinha
PE das Carnaúba
APA do Estuário Rio Mundaú
Timonha
TI Córrego João Pereira
APA Delta do Parnaíba
APA da Lagoa de Jijoca
PN de Jericoacoara
130
EH
EH
Protected Area
Alto Santo(CE)
1,042
VH
H
Protected Area
Pedro II(PI)
381
28
64
EH
H
EH
VH
H
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Piripiri(PI)
Beberibe(CE)
Piracuruca(PI)
18
H
H
Protected Area
Aquiraz(CE)
H
VH
H
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
IK
IK
IK
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
H
H
H
EH
H
VH
VH
H
VH
H
VH
H
H
H
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Aquiraz(CE)
Fortaleza(CE)
Fortaleza(CE)
Sobral(CE)
Tianguá(CE)
Tianguá(CE)
Fortaleza(CE)
Piracuruca(PI)
74
30
11
10
695
64
25
1,091
39
10
1
5
103
16
1,039
33
264
40
86
Caucaia(CE)
São Gonçalo do Amarante(CE)
Trairi(CE)
Granja(CE)
Itapipoca(CE)
Granja(CE)
Acaraú(CE)
Luís Correia(PI)
Cruz(CE)
Cruz(CE)
Atlantic Forest Biome
Table 11.9.5 – List of Priority Areas for the Atlantic Forest Biome with: area code, size (km2), biological importance (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high, IK –
insufficiently known), urgency for action (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high), main priority action recommended, and main municipality.
Size (km2) Importance Priority Priority Action
Main Municipality
Area code Name
Ma001
Foz da Maquiné
20
VH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Maquiné(RS)
MaZc002
Foz do R. Três Forquilhas
31
H
H
Mosaic/Corridor
Três Cachoeiras(RS)
Ma003
Contrafontes do Ferrabraz
202
VH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Sapiranga(RS)
227
Ma004
Ma005
Ma006
Ma007
MaZc008
Ma009
Ma010
Ma011
Ma012
Ma013
Ma014
Ma015
Ma016
MaZc017
Ma018
Ma019
Ma020
Ma021
MaZc022
Ma023
Ma024
MaZc025
Ma026
Ma027
Ma028
MaZc029
Ma030
Ma031
MaZc032
Ma033
Ma034
Ma035
Ma036
MaZc037
MaZc038
Brochier e Maratá
Botucarai
Quarta Colônia
Vale dos Sinos
Complexo Lagoa do Forno e Jacaré
Mata
Westfalia
Serra do Silverão e Jozafá
Nova Esperança do Sul
Vale do Caí
Boqueirão(RS)
Campos de São Francisco
Mata Paludosa - Santa Rosa do Sul
Lagoas costeiras do extremo sul de SC
Escarpas da Serra Geral
Muçum
Nascente do Antas
Rio das Antas
Ponto do Peixe
Reio das Antas
Campos de Bom Jesus
Ecótono do cabo de Sta Marta
Butiazal de Laguna
Represa Ernestina
Corredor do Pelotas
Mirim
Bozano-Ajuricaba
Rio Telha
Passarim
Campo do Planalto das Araucárias
Anitápolis
Corredor Turvo-Ijuí
Anitápolis II
Maciço Cristalino Sul da Ilha de SC
PAREST Serra do Tabuleiro Corridor
328
1,935
1,272
132
152
1,000
427
315
479
663
145
2,167
29
664
3,820
1,498
1,631
640
5
749
1,389
2,167
29
158
4,361
24
728
298
267
4,926
1,499
2,392
290
61
15
H
VH
VH
H
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
IK
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Inventory
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Inventory
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Inventory
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Environmental Education
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Environmental Education
Creation full protection PA
Montenegro(RS)
Santa Cruz do Sul(RS)
Santa Maria(RS)
Carlos Barbosa(RS)
Torres(RS)
Santiago(RS)
Teutônia(RS)
São Francisco de Paula(RS)
Santiago(RS)
Caxias do Sul(RS)
Santa Cruz do Sul(RS)
Canela(RS)
Santa Rosa do Sul(SC)
Criciúma(SC)
Criciúma(SC)
Caxias do Sul(RS)
São Francisco de Paula(RS)
Caxias do Sul(RS)
Içara(SC)
São Francisco de Paula(RS)
Bom Jesus(RS)
Tubarão(SC)
Laguna(SC)
Passo Fundo(RS)
Lages(SC)
Imbituba(SC)
Ijuí(RS)
Ciríaco(RS)
Palhoça(SC)
Lages(SC)
Imaruí(SC)
Santo Ângelo(RS)
Águas Mornas(SC)
Palhoça(SC)
228
Ma039
MaZc040
MaZc041
Ma042
MaZc043
Ma044
Ma045
Ma046
Ma047
Ma048
Ma049
Ma050
Entorno de Carijós
Serra do Pitoco
Rio Fortaleza
Vales do Rio Tijucas - Biguaçu
Curitibanos Corridor
Rio Uruguai Corridor (East)
Serra Geral de Agrolândia
Turvo Corridor
MaZc051
Ganchos
MaZc052
Ma053
Ma054
Ma055
Ma056
MaZc057
Ma058
Ma059
MaZc060
Ma061
MaZc062
Ma063
Ma064
Ma065
Ma066
Ma067
Ma068
Ma069
Planície de Maré Baía Tijucas
Ametista do Sul
Lageado Grande
PE do Turvo-TI Guarita Corridor
Fragmentos Concórdia
Costeira de Zimbros
Vale do Neisse
Rio Uruguai Corridor
Vale do Rio Camburiú
Rio Uruguai Corridor (West)
Costa Brava
Entorno Flona Chapecó
Serra das Bateias
Dickea
Ibirama
Raulinoa
Hering-Burgerkopf
Peperi-Guaçu Connection
Morraria do Atalaia e Canto do
Morcego
Praia de Navegantes
Lebon Régis
MaZc070
MaZc071
Ma072
Alfredo Wagner
Costa Leste da Ilha de Sta Catarina
Maciço Cristalino Norte da Ilha de SC
Entorno do Parque Estadual Rio Canoas
1,205
136
76
40
25
259
383
2,862
268
928
22
245
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
VH
VH
H
VH
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
Environmental Education
Mosaic/Corridor
Environmental Education
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Ituporanga(SC)
66
VH
VH
Recuperation
12
115
85
84
73
68
914
110
677
499
47
112
298
23
105
128
94
666
EH
VH
VH
H
H
H
VH
H
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
H
H
EH
EH
H
VH
VH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Otacílio Costa(SC)
Seberi(RS)
São José(SC)
Curitibanos(SC)
Chapecó(SC)
Otacílio Costa(SC)
Três Passos(RS)
Governador Celso
Ramos(SC)
Tijucas(SC)
Frederico Westphalen(RS)
Nonoai(RS)
Tenente Portela(RS)
Concórdia(SC)
Porto Belo(SC)
Blumenau(SC)
Chapecó(SC)
Itajaí(SC)
Palmitos(SC)
Balneário Camboriú(SC)
Chapecó(SC)
Blumenau(SC)
Ibirama(SC)
Ibirama(SC)
Blumenau(SC)
Blumenau(SC)
Itapiranga(SC)
4
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Itajaí(SC)
3
52
VH
EH
H
EH
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Navegantes(SC)
Lebon Régis(SC)
Campos Novos(SC)
229
Ma073
Ma074
MaZc075
Ma076
Ma077
Ma078
Ma079
Ma080
Ma081
Ma082
Ma083
Ma084
Ma085
Ma086
Ma087
MaZc088
Ma089
Ma090
Ma091
Ma092
MaZc093
Ma094
Ma095
Ma096
MaZc097
MaZc098
Ma099
Ma100
MaZc101
Ma102
Ma103
MaZc104
Ma105
Ma106
Ma107
Vitor Meireles
Timbó Grande
Morrarias de Penha
Sassafras - Serra do Mar
Fragmento do Vargeão
Estação EMBRAPA
Nascentes do Rio Luiz Alves
Chapecó Corridor
Faxinal dos Guedes
Campos de Água Doce
Restinga das Lagoas da Cruz e
Barra Velha
168
2,325
44
638
19
46
442
584
25
743
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Inventory
Environmental Education
Recuperation
Inventory
Fostering sustainable use
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Presidente Getúlio(SC)
Canoinhas(SC)
Navegantes(SC)
Rio Negrinho(SC)
Ponte Serrada(SC)
Caçador(SC)
Blumenau(SC)
Abelardo Luz(SC)
Faxinal dos Guedes(SC)
Palmas(PR)
7
VH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Araquari(SC)
Prolongation of the Chapecó Corridor
178
2,406
1,193
902
13
97
11
485
33
8
500
73
177
1,059
112
993
1,074
13
780
894
145
125
1,681
69
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
H
VH
H
EH
IK
VH
EH
EH
H
EH
H
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Inventory
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Inventory
Recuperation
Abelardo Luz(SC)
Joinville(SC)
Mafra(SC)
São Miguel do Oeste(SC)
Doutor Pedrinho - Jaraguá
Serra da Abelha - Santa Terezinha
Palma Sola
Arquipélago dos Remédios
Rio Tamanduá
RPPN Edson Mel
Serra da Taquara Verde
Abelardo Luz
Arquipélago de Tamboretes
Entorno do Refúgio de Palmas
Sudoeste de Joiville
União da Vitória
Baia de Babitonga e Itapoá
Baía da Babitonga e Ilhas
Peperiguaçu Corridor
Serra Dona Francisca
Arquipélago da Paz
Rio Iratizinho
Rio Negro/Rio da Várzea Corridor
Barra do Saí-Guaçu
Campos do Quiriri
Rio Iratim
Tijucas
Canoinhas(SC)
Abelardo Luz(SC)
Porto União(SC)
Abelardo Luz(SC)
Palmas(PR)
Joinville(SC)
Porto União(SC)
Joinville(SC)
Joinville(SC)
Capanema(PR)
Joinville(SC)
União da Vitória(PR)
São Bento do Sul(SC)
Guaratuba(PR)
Guaratuba(PR)
Palmas(PR)
Tijucas do Sul(PR)
230
MaZc108
Ma109
MaZc110
Ma111
MaZc112
MaZc113
Ma114
MaZc115
Ma116
Ma117
Ma118
Ma119
Ma120
Ma121
MaZc122
MaZc123
Ma124
Ma125
MaZc126
Ma127
Ma128
MaZc129
Ma130
Ma131
Ma132
MaZc133
Ma134
Ma135
Ma136
Ma137
MaZc138
Ma139
Ma140
Ma141
Baía de Guaratuba
Rio da Várzea
Arquipélago Currais e Ilhas Itacolomi
São Mateus
Lagoa do Parado
Plataforma interna do Paraná
Mangueirinha - Rio Jordão Corridor
Pontal do Paraná
Norte de Guaricana
Rio Pinhão
Várzea do Rio Iguaçu
Afluente do Rio Água Quente Corridor
Médio Rio Iguaçu Corridor
Foz do Rio Jordão
Baía de Paranaguá
Baía de Antonina
Represa Osório Santiago
Rio das Almas Corridor
Morretes
Rio Iguaçu - Rio das Cobras Corridor
Nascente do Rio dos Patos
Ilhas da Figueira e Castilho
Cavernosa
Guarapuava
Várzeas do Tibagi-Ibituvão
Barra de Cananéia
Entorno dos parques Campos gerais
Entorno do PARES das Lauráceas
Turvo
Barra Grande
Ilha Comprida
Entorno da margem esq. do
reservatório de Itaipu
Itaipu - Parque do Iguaçu Corridor
PE de Jacupiranga e PE das
Lauráceas Corridor
222
91
66
1,312
117
1,826
83
335
134
1,252
115
73
67
593
98
334
146
129
137
621
81
104
733
83
259
44
231
1,182
215
521
132
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
H
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Inventory
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Other
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Inventory
Inventory
Inventory
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Other
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Guaratuba(PR)
Lapa(PR)
2,197
VH
H
Recuperation
Foz do Iguaçu(PR)
450
H
VH
Recuperation
Santa Helena(PR)
194
H
H
Mosaic/Corridor
Barra do Turvo(SP)
Canoinhas(SC)
Guaratuba(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Chopinzinho(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
São José dos Pinhais(PR)
Guarapuava(PR)
Curitiba(PR)
Irati(PR)
Lapa(PR)
Pinhão(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Rio Bonito do Iguaçu(PR)
São João do Triunfo(PR)
Antonina(PR)
Dois Vizinhos(PR)
Guarapuava(PR)
Guarapuava(PR)
Guarapuava(PR)
Ponta Grossa(PR)
Cananéia(SP)
Ponta Grossa(PR)
Campina Grande do Sul(PR)
Turvo(PR)
Guarapuava(PR)
Iguape(SP)
231
Ma142
Ma143
Ma144
MaZc145
Ma146
Ma147
Ma148
Ma150
Ma151
Ma153
MaZc154
MaZc155
MaZc156
MaZc157
MaZc158
Ma159
Ma160
Ma161
MaZc162
MaZc163
MaZc164
Ma165
Ma166
MaZc167
Ma168
MaZc169
MaZc170
MaZc171
MaZc173
Ma174
Ma175
Ma176
Castro
Reserva
Alto Ribeira
Costeira - Isóbata de 20 a 30m de
profundidade
Médio e Baixo Ribeira
Rio Teixeira
Entorno do PARES Caxambu
Rio Cantu
Costa do Xiririca
Fazenda Nova Trieste
Costeira - Isóbata de 5 a 20m de
profundidade
Ilhas e ilhotas Litoral Sul-SP
Costeira - Isóbata de 0 a 5m de
profundidade
Itanhaém
Alcatrazes
Nascentes do Paranapanema (Sul)
Klabin
Entorno PARES Cerrado
Região entre Baía de Santos e Guarujá
Guaiúba - Guarujá e Saco do Major
- Ilha da Moela
Restingas da Praia Grande
Arapoti
Rio Goioerê
Estuário de São Vicente
Serra do Mar Planalto
Ilhas e ilhotes de Ilhabela
Canal de Bertioga
Quilombos do Médio Ribeira
Ilhas e ilhotes de São Sebastião
Billings - Guarapiranga
Canal de São Sebastião
Varzeas do Rio Xambrê
219
138
2,848
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
2,225
VH
EH
Recuperation
4,031
374
127
566
337
229
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Creation full protection PA
Registro(SP)
Castro(PR)
Castro(PR)
Palmital(PR)
Eldorado(SP)
Eldorado(SP)
5,274
VH
VH
Recuperation
Ilhabela(SP)
H
H
1,277
EH
EH
Other
Santos(SP)
445
23
488
799
107
26
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Praia Grande(SP)
Capão Bonito(SP)
Telêmaco Borba(PR)
Jaguariaíva(PR)
Guarujá(SP)
20
H
EH
Recuperation
Guarujá(SP)
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
Recuperation
Inventory
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Recuperation
São Vicente(SP)
Arapoti(PR)
Assis Chateaubriand(PR)
Santos(SP)
Ibiúna(SP)
14
48
65
1,250
92
1,327
2
162
119
4
1,260
105
190
Castro(PR)
Reserva(PR)
Ponta Grossa(PR)
Creation full protection PA
Santos(SP)
Santos(SP)
São Paulo(SP)
Ilhabela(SP)
Altônia(PR)
232
MaZc177
Ma178
Ma179
MaZc180
Ma181
Ma182
Ma183
Ma184
MaZc185
Ma186
Ma187
Ma188
Ma190
Ma191
Ma192
MaZc193
Ma194
Ma195
Ma196
Ma197
Ma198
Ma199
MaZc200
Ma201
Ma202
Ma203
Ma204
MaZc205
MaZc206
Ma207
Ma208
MaZc209
MaZc210
Itaguaré - Bertioga
Morro Grande
Capão Bonito
Restingas de Bertioga
Entorno Terra Indígena Apucarana
Mogi - Salesópolis
Pilar do Sul
Ilhas e ilhotes de Caragatatuba
Praias e costões do litoral norte de
Ubatuba
Vila Rica do Espírito Santo
Buri
Entorno da REBIO das Perobas
Itaporanga
Zona de Amortecimento PE Paraibuna
Figueira
Ilhas e ilhotes de Ubatuba
Rio Keller
Coronel Macedo
Matas da Rio Ivaí
Serra do Japi
Iperó
Nascente do Pirapó
Iha Grande e Jorge Grego
Entorno da Mata do Godoy
Jundiaí do Sul
Cantareira - entorno
Mata do Godoy - Rio Tibagi Corridor
Baía da Ilha Grande - RJ
Ilhas costeiras da região
metropolitana do RJ
Rio Naracaí (MS)
Zona de Amort. do PE Serra do Mar
- litoral norte
Bocaina
Arraial do Cabo
48
895
1,512
85
311
515
764
2
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Bertioga(SP)
Embu(SP)
Itapetininga(SP)
Bertioga(SP)
Londrina(PR)
Santos(SP)
Itapetininga(SP)
283
VH
EH
Recuperation
Caraguatatuba(SP)
322
313
305
23
105
79
7
160
166
331
1,061
237
74
154
80
40
1,079
141
1,214
VH
IK
VH
IK
H
VH
EH
H
IK
VH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
H
H
H
EH
EH
VH
H
H
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering sustainable use
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
São João do Ivaí(PR)
Itapeva(SP)
Cianorte(PR)
Itaporanga(SP)
Paraibuna(SP)
Ibaiti(PR)
104
VH
VH
Creation PA – undefined category
480
VH
H
Mosaic/Corridor
Itaquiraí(MS)
258
H
H
Recuperation
Ubatuba(SP)
162
84
EH
EH
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Angra dos Reis(RJ)
Cabo Frio(RJ)
Mandaguari(PR)
Taquarituba(SP)
Cianorte(PR)
Sorocaba(SP)
Itapetininga(SP)
Apucarana(PR)
Londrina(PR)
Ribeirão do Pinhal(PR)
São Paulo(SP)
Londrina(PR)
Angra dos Reis(RJ)
233
MaZc211
MaZc212
MaZc213
MaZc214
MaZc215
MaZc216
Ma217
MaZc218
MaZc219
MaZc220
MaZc221
Ma222
MaZc223
Ma224
MaZc225
Ma226
MaZc227
Ma228
MaZc229
Ma230
Ma231
Ma232
MaZc233
Ma234
Ma235
Ma236
Ma237
Ma238
Ma239
Ma240
Ma241
Ma242
Ma243
Ma244
Ma245
Baia de Sepetiba
Lagoa de Itaipu-morro das andorinhas
Lagoas costeiras do estado do Rio
Lagoa de Araruama
Tampão da Fl da Tijuca
Itaocaia
Piraju
Lagoas de Saquarema
Maricá
Bacaxá
Engenho pequeno
Pardinho
Cabo de Búzios e ilhas adjacentes
Cantareira - Mantiqueira Corridor
Baía da Guanabara
Cabo Frio
Mico Leão Corridor
Entorno PARES Mata de São Francisco
Baixada do N Fluminense
Angra dos Reis
Rio Amambaí II (MS)
Rafard
Mauá
Sul da APA da Serra da Mantiqueira
Cabeceiras do Paraitinga
Sambê -Santa Fé Ecological Corridor
Guapi
Bacia do Macacu
Borda Sul do Tingua
Rio Amambaí (MS)
Pirapó
Serra de Paracambí
Oleo
Guapi- Macacu
Borda do Tinguá
1,004
8
39
226
43
8
1,108
75
309
55
11
459
145
1,912
296
9
840
113
2,217
2,223
118
387
104
75
260
279
65
355
149
1,144
50
147
154
345
161
EH
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
H
VH
H
VH
H
IK
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
EH
IK
EH
VH
H
H
H
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
VH
H
IK
H
VH
H
H
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
H
H
VH
EH
H
EH
H
H
VH
H
EH
VH
VH
EH
H
H
H
VH
H
EH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering sustainable use
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Rio de Janeiro(RJ)
Niterói(RJ)
Maricá(RJ)
Cabo Frio(RJ)
Rio de Janeiro(RJ)
Maricá(RJ)
Piraju(SP)
Saquarema(RJ)
São Gonçalo(RJ)
Saquarema(RJ)
São Gonçalo(RJ)
Botucatu(SP)
Cabo Frio(RJ)
São José dos Campos(SP)
Rio de Janeiro(RJ)
Cabo Frio(RJ)
Cabo Frio(RJ)
Cornélio Procópio(PR)
Macaé(RJ)
Volta Redonda(RJ)
Naviraí(MS)
Santa Bárbara d'Oeste(SP)
Duque de Caxias(RJ)
Pindamonhangaba(SP)
Cunha(SP)
Itaboraí(RJ)
Magé(RJ)
Itaboraí(RJ)
Duque de Caxias(RJ)
Amambaí(MS)
Colorado(PR)
Paracambi(RJ)
Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo(SP)
Magé(RJ)
Duque de Caxias(RJ)
234
MaZc246
MaZc247
MaZc248
Ma249
Ma250
Ma251
Ma252
Ma253
Ma254
Ma255
MaZc256
Ma257
Ma258
Ma259
Ma260
Ma261
Ma262
Ma263
MaZc264
Ma265
Ma266
Ma267
Ma268
Ma269
Ma270
Ma271
Ma272
Ma273
Ma274
MaZc275
Ma276
Ma277
Ma278
Ma279
Rio das Ostras
Arquipélago de Santana
Faixa de marinha de Jurubatiba
Piquete - Adjacente à APA da Serra
da Mantiqueira
Mendes
TereFri
Caledônia
Amparo
Ribeirão do Caiuá
Área tampão Itatiaia
Carapebus
Conservatória
Narandiba- Paranapanema
Sapucaí Corridor
Caiuá - Morro do Diabo Corridor
Teresópolis
Paquequer
Rio grande
Lagoa Feia
Três Picos e Desegano Corridor
Quissamã
Sapucai
Rio Macabú
Águas de Lindoia
Ribeirão Ribório (MS)
Rosana
Corumbataí
Macabú
Pouso Alegre/Conceição das
Pedras Corridor
Farol de São Tomé
Santa Rita da Floresta
Analândia e Presidente Epitácio
Marília
Rio Preto (MG)
253
20
1,320
76
323
150
141
151
318
376
58
602
3,164
628
119
560
152
313
811
2,006
47
149
84
242
212
272
79
311
291
399
372
1,169
1,690
2,336
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
H
H
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
EH
H
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
H
H
VH
VH
VH
H
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
H
H
VH
H
H
VH
H
H
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering sustainable use
Inventory
Macaé(RJ)
Macaé(RJ)
Cruzeiro(SP)
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Barra do Piraí(RJ)
Teresópolis(RJ)
Nova Friburgo(RJ)
Nova Friburgo(RJ)
Paranavaí(PR)
Resende(RJ)
Quissamã(RJ)
Barra Mansa(RJ)
Cândido Mota(SP)
Pouso Alegre(MG)
Rosana(SP)
Petrópolis(RJ)
Nova Friburgo(RJ)
Nova Friburgo(RJ)
H
Creation PA – undefined category
Santa Rita do Sapucaí(MG)
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
Quissamã(RJ)
Pouso Alegre(MG)
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
Mogi Guaçu(SP)
Ivinhema(MS)
Rosana(SP)
Rio Claro(SP)
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
Bom Jardim(RJ)
Presidente Epitácio(SP)
Marília(SP)
Juiz de Fora(MG)
235
Ma280
Ma281
MaZc282
Ma283
Ma284
Ma285
Ma286
Ma287
Ma288
Ma289
MaZc290
Ma291
Ma292
Ma293
Ma294
Ma295
Ma296
Ma297
Ma298
Ma299
Ma300
Ma301
Ma302
Ma303
Ma304
Ma305
Ma306
Carmo
Mirante de Paranapanema
Tartaruga marinha
Serra das Águas
Região de Juiz de Fora
Ribeirão Laranjalzinho/Piravevê (MS)
Anaurilândia
Mar de Espanha/Pirapitinga/Além
Paraíba
Lagoa do Campelo
Rio Paraiba do Sul
Foz do rio Paraíba
Pirassuninga
Bastos
Paz Na Terra
Região de Poços de Caldas
Entorno do PARES Ibitipoca
Caiuá
Cambucí
Iguapeí-Duartina
Região de Carrancas/São Tomé das
Letras
Rio Pomba
Santa Rita do Passaquatro
Águas da Prata/ São José do Rio Pardo
Morro do Coco
Miracema-Ubá
Nascentes do Rio Pomba
Laranjal/Miracema
MaZc307
Praia das Neves
Ma308
Ma309
Ma310
Ma311
Ma312
Rio Vacaria (MS)
Flora Rica
Ouro Verdde
Sul Brigadeiro Corridor
Rio Muriaé
228
550
4,115
174
1,187
651
1,880
VH
IK
VH
H
H
VH
VH
VH
H
H
H
VH
H
H
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Cantagalo(RJ)
Álvares Machado(SP)
1,245
VH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Leopoldina(MG)
80
414
218
403
345
125
387
68
156
262
1,930
VH
EH
H
VH
IK
VH
VH
EH
H
H
H
VH
EH
H
H
H
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
H
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Planning and regularization
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
Poços de Caldas(MG)
Lima Duarte(MG)
Presidente Epitácio(SP)
São Fidélis(RJ)
Bauru(SP)
1,293
VH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Cruzília(MG)
378
148
1,947
143
169
284
322
EH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
IK
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Inventory
Cataguases(MG)
Descalvado(SP)
Poços de Caldas(MG)
67
EH
VH
Fostering sustainable use
841
413
170
525
241
VH
EH
EH
VH
IK
H
EH
EH
VH
H
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
São Gonçalo do Sapucaí(MG)
Juiz de Fora(MG)
Nova Andradina(MS)
Bataguassu(MS)
São João da Boa Vista(SP)
Tupã(SP)
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
Itaperuna(RJ)
Cataguases(MG)
Muriaé(MG)
São Francisco de
Itabapoana(RJ)
Rio Brilhante(MS)
Dracena(SP)
Presidente Venceslau(SP)
Cataguases(MG)
Muriaé(MG)
236
MaZc313
Ma314
Ma315
Ma316
Ma317
Ma318
Ma319
Ma320
Ma321
MaZc322
Ma323
Ma324
Ma325
MaZc326
Ma327
MaZc328
Ma329
MaZc330
Ma331
MaZc332
Ma333
Ma334
Ma335
Ma336
Ma337
MaZc338
Ma339
Área marinha das ilhas de
Marataízes - ES
Florestas do Planalto Sul Mineiro
Santa Rosa do Viterbo
Serra das Torres
Lajes de Murié
Promissao
Panorama
Serra de São José
Alto Calçado
Ilhas Piúma/Francês
Mendonça/Novo Horizonte
Varre - sai
Junqueirópolis
Anchieta
Região de carangola
Área marinha das ilhas de
Guarapari - ES
Area de Itabapuã
Área Costeira entre Vila Velha e
Itapemirim
Aguapeí II
Área Costeira entre Vila Velha e
Marataízes
Região Piranga/viçosa
Entorno do PARNES da Serra do
Brigadeiro
Aguapei II
Buritama
Mirandópolis
Área marinha das ilhas de Vila Velha
PARES Brigadeiro-Caparaó Corridor
Ma340
Guzolândia
Ma341
MaZc342
MaZc343
Região Serrana
Mangue do Lameirão
Área Costeira entre Serra e Vitória
640
EH
VH
Fostering sustainable use
Marataízes(ES)
1,129
389
651
421
234
59
578
35
577
2,195
396
32
112
1,013
H
VH
EH
EH
H
IK
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
VH
VH
H
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Environmental Education
Creation PA – undefined category
Guaxupé(MG)
Mococa(SP)
Alegre(ES)
Itaperuna(RJ)
Promissão(SP)
Dracena(SP)
São João del Rei(MG)
Mimoso do Sul(ES)
Guarapari(ES)
Lins(SP)
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Environmental Education
Mosaic/Corridor
Bom Jesus do Itabapoana(RJ)
Junqueirópolis(SP)
Guarapari(ES)
Carangola(MG)
544
EH
VH
Fostering sustainable use
Vila Velha(ES)
62
H
H
Creation PA – undefined category
Bom Jesus do Itabapoana(RJ)
756
H
H
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Vila Velha(ES)
93
EH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Guaraçaí(SP)
H
H
403
VH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Viçosa(MG)
378
EH
VH
Creation PA – undefined category
Muriaé(MG)
947
957
1,086
237
859
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
65
VH
H
5,845
28
526
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
H
Três Lagoas(MS)
Birigui(SP)
Araçatuba(SP)
Vila Velha(ES)
Manhuaçu(MG)
Santo Antônio do
Aracanguá(SP)
Vila Velha(ES)
Cariacica(ES)
Vila Velha(ES)
1,791
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Fisheries Planning and regularization
237
Ma344
MaZc345
Ma346
Ma347
Ma348
Ma349
Ma350
MaZc351
Ma352
Ma353
Ma354
Ma355
Ma356
Ma357
MaZc358
Ma359
Ma360
Ma361
Ma362
MaZc363
Ma364
Ma365
Ma366
Ma367
MaZc368
Ma369
Ma370
Ma371
Ma372
MaZc373
Ma374
Pindobas
Queimados
Foz do Tietê
Sud Mennucci
Caparaó/Simonésia Corridor
Guaraci
Matipó
REVIS Santa Cruz/ APA Costa das
Algas (prop.)
Itapura
Quadrilátero Ferrífero
Suzanápolis
Três Lagoas
Pontalinda
Ilha Solteira
Piraquê-Açu
Várzeas do Rio Paraná
Alto Misterioso
Caratinga-Simonésia Corridor
Fronteira
Área marinha contígua à Foz do Rio
Doce
Itaguaçu
Riolândia
Belo Horizonte - Sabará
Entorno Sudoeste do PARES do Rio
Doce
Foz do Rio Doce – Sustainable use
PA proposal
Caratinga
Entorno da ESEC Paulo Afonso
Entorno Nordeste do PARES do Rio
Doce
Sete Salões/Aimorés Corridor
Planície Costeira do Rio Doce
Complexo Lagunar
884
49
424
58
453
327
756
EH
H
EH
IK
EH
EH
IK
EH
H
EH
H
VH
EH
H
Creation PA – undefined category
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Inventory
Afonso Cláudio(ES)
Serra(ES)
Andradina(SP)
Sud Mennucci(SP)
Manhuaçu(MG)
Barretos(SP)
Manhuaçu(MG)
1,497
EH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Serra(ES)
28
7,268
101
70
299
39
74
3,142
35
759
41
IK
EH
H
VH
VH
IK
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
H
H
H
H
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering sustainable use
Inventory
Recuperation
Planning and regularization
Mosaic/Corridor
Ilha Solteira(SP)
Belo Horizonte(MG)
Pereira Barreto(SP)
Três Lagoas(MS)
Jales(SP)
Ilha Solteira(SP)
Aracruz(ES)
Três Lagoas(MS)
Santa Teresa(ES)
Caratinga(MG)
Frutal(MG)
906
EH
H
190
1,032
32
H
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
Inventory
Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering sustainable use
Baixo Guandu(ES)
Nova Granada(SP)
Belo Horizonte(MG)
897
H
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Timóteo(MG)
480
EH
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Linhares(ES)
72
20
VH
EH
VH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Caratinga(MG)
Paulo de Faria(SP)
222
H
EH
Creation full protection PA
Ipatinga(MG)
H
EH
H
EH
EH
H
Planning and regularization
Creation sustainable use PA
Inventory
Colatina(ES)
Linhares(ES)
Linhares(ES)
1,092
2,102
1,727
Inventory
238
MaZc375
MaZc376
Ma377
Ma378
Ma379
Ma380
Ma381
Ma382
Ma383
Ma384
MaZc385
MaZc386
Ma387
MaZc388
Ma389
MaZc390
Ma391
MaZc392
Ma393
MaZc394
MaZc395
MaZc396
Ma397
MaZc398
MaZc399
Ma400
MaZc401
Ma402
Ma403
Ma404
MaZc405
MaZc406
MaZc407
Ma408
Ma409
Floresta da Vale do Rio Doce
Área Cost. de Monsaraes à Ponta
dos Lençóis
Divisa GO/MS
Região dos Pontões
Nascentes do Barra Seca
Espinhaço Central Corridor
Rio Verde
Mantena
ZA do Parque de Itaúnas/ Área marinha
Serra do Ambrósio
Conceição da Barra Mosaic
Rio Mucuri
Matas de Itumbiara
REBIO Mucuri Proposal
Frei Gaspar
Rio Peruípe
Matas de Tupaciguara
Cassurubá
Alto Mucuri
Rio Itanhentinga
Vale do Jucuruçu
Contorno sul do PARNA Descobrimento
Novo Oriente de Minas
Mussununga
Expansion of PARNA do Descobrimento
Jucuruçu
Guaratinga
Serra Itamaraju
Joaíma
Cabeceira do Rio do Peixe
REBIO Rio dos Frades Proposal
Monte Pascoal - Pau Brasil Corridor
Expansion of PARNA Pau Brasil
Itabela
Itinga/Araçuaí
435
EH
H
Creation sustainable use PA
Linhares(ES)
3,511
EH
VH
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Linhares(ES)
47
1,193
395
3,188
88
216
76
4,423
742
633
2,384
31
212
1,406
717
634
821
1,240
511
128
805
60
150
1,595
1,181
1,116
2,544
4,475
14
702
135
1,147
5,100
IK
VH
EH
EH
IK
H
VH
EH
EH
H
EH
IK
IK
H
EH
VH
VH
H
H
H
H
IK
EH
H
H
EH
H
IK
H
EH
EH
IK
VH
H
H
H
VH
H
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
H
H
H
EH
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
Inventory
Inventory
Inventory
Creation PA – undefined category
Inventory
Planning and regularization
Creation PA – undefined category
Paranaíba(MS)
Colatina(ES)
Linhares(ES)
Serro(MG)
Caçu(GO)
Mantena(MG)
Mucuri(BA)
Governador Valadares(MG)
Mucuri(BA)
Nova Viçosa(BA)
Uberlândia(MG)
Nova Viçosa(BA)
Teófilo Otoni(MG)
Teixeira de Freitas(BA)
Itumbiara(GO)
Nova Viçosa(BA)
Teófilo Otoni(MG)
Teixeira de Freitas(BA)
Itamaraju(BA)
Prado(BA)
Teófilo Otoni(MG)
Prado(BA)
Prado(BA)
Teixeira de Freitas(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Itamaraju(BA)
Jequitinhonha(MG)
Itamaraju(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Salinas(MG)
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Inventory
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
239
Ma410
Ma411
Ma412
Ma413
MaZc414
Ma415
MaZc416
Ma417
Ma418
Ma419
Ma420
MaZc421
Ma422
Ma423
Ma424
MaZc425
Ma426
MaZc427
Ma428
MaZc429
Ma430
Ma431
MaZc432
Ma433
Ma434
Ma435
Ma436
Ma437
MaZc438
MaZc439
Ma440
Ma441
Ma442
Ma443
MaZc444
Jequitinhonha/ Mata Escura Corridor
REVIS Ponta Grande
Alto Cariri
RPPN Estação Veracel/Estação
Pau-Brasil CEPLAC
São Miguel (BA)
Entorno da REBIO Mata Escura
Belmonte
Várzeas do Jequitinhonha
Fazenda Taquara
Fazenda Limoeiro
Serra dos Barbados
Jequitinhonha
Mascote
Itarantim
Bandeira
Florestas pluviais do Pardo
Pedra Azul
Campos Úmidos de Santa Luzia
Pau-Brasil-folha-de-laranja
Una S. Baixão Protected Areas Corridor
Itaju do Colônia
Borda do Planalto de conquista
Bacia Cachoeira-Santana
Barra do Choça
Serras de Coaraci
Borda leste da Serra da Oricana
Boa Nova
Cabrucas de Gongogi
Serra das Onças/Machado
Lagoa Santa
Planalto de Maracás
Entorno da Esperança
Fragmentos de Mutuípe
Vale do Jequiriça
Água Branca
820
9
873
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Araçuaí(MG)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Guaratinga(BA)
77
EH
H
Fostering sustainable use
Porto Seguro(BA)
278
698
1,168
1,400
32
264
612
1,187
383
466
3,156
1,420
5,126
1,065
3,360
3,450
1,024
5,682
3,221
184
1,331
3,430
236
2,997
567
317
2,419
596
296
2,555
238
VH
VH
EH
VH
IK
H
EH
EH
VH
IK
EH
VH
IK
H
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Fostering sustainable use
Inventory
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering sustainable use
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Fostering sustainable use
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Porto Seguro(BA)
Almenara(MG)
Santa Cruz Cabrália(BA)
Almenara(MG)
Belmonte(BA)
Almenara(MG)
Itarantim(BA)
Canavieiras(BA)
Belmonte(BA)
Itarantim(BA)
Almenara(MG)
Canavieiras(BA)
Almenara(MG)
Canavieiras(BA)
Itapetinga(BA)
Ilhéus(BA)
Itapetinga(BA)
Vitória da Conquista(BA)
Ilhéus(BA)
Vitória da Conquista(BA)
Ilhéus(BA)
Jequié(BA)
Boa Nova(BA)
Ilhéus(BA)
Camamu(BA)
Gandu(BA)
Jequié(BA)
Jequié(BA)
Valença(BA)
Jaguaquara(BA)
Valença(BA)
240
Ma445
MaZc446
MaZc447
MaZc448
Ma449
MaZc450
MaZc451
MaZc452
MaZc454
Ma455
MaZc456
MaZc457
MaZc458
MaZc459
Ma460
MaZc461
Ma462
MaZc463
Ma464
MaZc465
Ma466
MaZc467
MaZc468
MaZc469
MaZc470
MaZc471
Ma472
MaZc473
MaZc474
Ma475
MaZc476
MaZc477
MaZc478
Manguezais de Jaguaripe
Jaguaripe e Salinas das Margaridas
Matas da Paralela e Pituaçu
Manguezais do Recôncavo Baiano
Serra Da Pioneira / Serra Da Jiboia
Dunas de Abrantes
Entorno de Camaçari
Serra de S. Francisco e Reman. do
Bx. Paraguassu
Praia do Forte e Imbassaí
Serra do Timbó
Fragmentos do Litoral Norte
Massarandupió
Complexo de zonas úmidas e
restingas do Itapicuru
Litoral e complexo das matas do sul
de Sergipe
Fragmentos de Estância e Boquim
Foz do Vaza Barris
Mata seca do riachão
Estuário do Sergipe
Matas de Areia Branca
Foz do São Francisco (Litoral)
Mata de Oiteiro e Caititu
Região de Japaratuba
Banco do Peba
Foz do São Francisco
Pontal do Coruripe
Baixios de Dom Rodrigues
Coruripe
Lagoa de Jequiá
Pratagi
Santa Isabel
São Miguel dos Campos
Messias - Flexeiras
Talude da APA Costa dos Corais
214
233
44
416
370
14
264
IK
VH
H
IK
VH
IK
IK
H
EH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Vera Cruz(BA)
Maragogipe(BA)
Salvador(BA)
Maragogipe(BA)
Castro Alves(BA)
Camaçari(BA)
Camaçari(BA)
544
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Santo Amaro(BA)
152
377
2,389
176
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Camaçari(BA)
Catu(BA)
Camaçari(BA)
Entre Rios(BA)
212
EH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Conde(BA)
1,470
EH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Aracaju(SE)
273
514
210
1,060
18
2,647
299
1,279
277
318
33
343
33
404
1,355
13
808
686
1,500
IK
VH
IK
H
EH
EH
IK
EH
EH
EH
IK
VH
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
H
H
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
Estância(SE)
Aracaju(SE)
Lagarto(SE)
Aracaju(SE)
Areia Branca(SE)
Penedo(AL)
Capela(SE)
Capela(SE)
Coruripe(AL)
Penedo(AL)
Coruripe(AL)
Coruripe(AL)
Coruripe(AL)
Coruripe(AL)
Maceió(AL)
Campo Alegre(AL)
Maceió(AL)
Maceió(AL)
241
MaZc479
Ma480
Ma481
Ma482
MaZc483
Ma484
Ma485
Ma486
MaZc487
Ma488
MaZc489
MaZc490
Ma491
Ma492
Ma493
MaZc494
MaZc495
Ma496
MaZc497
MaZc498
MaZc499
MaZc500
MaZc501
Ma502
MaZc503
MaZc504
Ma505
MaZc506
Ma507
Ma508
MaZc509
MaZc510
Ma511
MaZc512
Ma513
Barra de Camaragibe
Bom Conselho
Entorno de Pedra Talhada
Entorno de Murici
Porto Calvo
Santo Antônio
Serra Grande
Garanhuns
Barreiros - Maragogi
Jaqueira
Guadalupe
Ipojuca
Bonito
Amaraji - Gravatá
Tapacurá
Cabo
Recifes
Bezerros
Pina- Parque dos manguezais
Capibaribe e Tegipió
Camaragibe - Tapacurá
Itamaracá - Coetés
Santa Teresa - Goiana
Mata do Estado/PE - Serra dos
Mascarenhas
Goiânia Pitimbu
Salgado de São Félix
Tambaba
Gramome - Mamuaba
Santa Rita
Buraquinho
Rio Paraíba
Pacatuba - Gargaú
Mamanguape - Rio Tinto
Entorno de Guaríbas
383
244
248
431
89
81
811
301
643
500
633
180
124
236
82
418
553
101
7
26
1,019
815
43
H
IK
VH
EH
H
IK
EH
IK
H
EH
EH
EH
IK
EH
H
H
VH
IK
MH
H
VH
VH
VH
VH
H
EH
EH
H
H
VH
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
VH
H
EH
H
H
EH
H
VH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
São Luís do Quitunde(AL)
Palmeira dos Índios(AL)
Correntes(PE)
União dos Palmares(AL)
Porto Calvo(AL)
Matriz de Camaragibe(AL)
União dos Palmares(AL)
Garanhuns(PE)
Palmares(PE)
Palmares(PE)
Ipojuca(PE)
Ipojuca(PE)
Bezerros(PE)
Gravatá(PE)
Recife(PE)
Bezerros(PE)
Recife(PE)
Recife(PE)
Recife(PE)
Olinda(PE)
Goiana(PE)
125
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Timbaúba(PE)
248
258
96
273
75
44
7
1,445
197
162
52
EH
VH
IK
VH
IK
IK
EH
EH
EH
H
H
VH
VH
H
VH
H
EH
H
EH
EH
H
H
Creation sustainable use PA
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
Inventory
Planning and regularization
Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering sustainable use
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Goiana(PE)
Caaporã(PB)
Timbaúba(PE)
Conde(PB)
Santa Rita(PB)
Santa Rita(PB)
João Pessoa(PB)
João Pessoa(PB)
Santa Rita(PB)
Mamanguape(PB)
Mamanguape(PB)
Cabo de Santo Agostinho(PE)
Jaboatão dos Guararapes(PE)
242
MaZc514
MaZc515
MaZc516
MaZc517
MaZc518
Ma519
MaZc520
MaZc521
MaZc522
MaZc523
MaZc524
MaZc525
MaZc526
MaZc884
Ma527
Ma528
Ma529
Ma530
Ma531
Ma532
MaZc533
Ma534
Ma535
Ma536
Ma537
Ma538
Ma539
Ma540
Ma541
Ma542
Ma543
Ma544
Ma545
Ma546
Ma547
Potíguara
Barra de Camaratuba
Baia formosa Mataraca
Baía Formosa Marinho
Mata da Estrela
Região da APA de Piquiri-Uma
Bom Jardim
Pipa-Nísia Floresta
Pirangi-Búzios
Barreira do inferno
Cotovelo Corridor
Mangue e dunas do Potengi
Dunas do Norte
Expansion of PE Ilha Anchieta
TI Varzinha
TI Guarani Barra do Ouro
REBIO da Serra Geral
REBIO Mata Paludosa
REBIO do Ibicuí Mirim
FLONA São Francisco de Paula
PE da Guarita
APA Rota do Sol
ESEC Aratinga
FLONA de Canela
PE do Caracol
PN de Aparados da Serra
PN da Serra Geral
PE do Tainhas
TI Salto Grande do Jacuí
REBIO do Aguaí
PE do Ibitiriá
FLONA Passo Fundo
TI Cachoeira dos Inácios
ESEC de Aracuri-Esmeralda
PN de São Joaquim
372
82
175
384
39
50
23
876
364
78
209
252
1,468
10
8
23
49
1
6
16
0
330
59
6
1
131
173
51
2
75
5
13
1
3
429
IK
IK
EH
VH
EH
IK
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
H
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
H
H
VH
VH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
EH
H
H
VH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Inventory
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation PA – undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Creation PA – undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Mamanguape(PB)
Mamanguape(PB)
Baía Formosa(RN)
Baía Formosa(RN)
Baía Formosa(RN)
Canguaretama(RN)
Canguaretama(RN)
São José de Mipibu(RN)
Parnamirim(RN)
Natal(RN)
Natal(RN)
Natal(RN)
Natal(RN)
Osório(RS)
Maquiné(RS)
Terra de Areia(RS)
Itati(RS)
Itaara(RS)
São Francisco de Paula(RS)
Torres(RS)
São Francisco de Paula(RS)
São Francisco de Paula(RS)
Canela(RS)
Canela(RS)
Praia Grande(SC)
Jacinto Machado(SC)
São Francisco de Paula(RS)
Salto do Jacuí(RS)
Siderópolis(SC)
Vacaria(RS)
Marau(RS)
Imaruí(SC)
Muitos Capões(RS)
Orleans(SC)
243
Ma548
Ma549
MaZc550
MaZc551
Ma552
Ma553
Ma554
MaZc555
Ma556
Ma557
MaZc558
MaZc559
MaZc560
Ma561
Ma562
Ma563
Ma564
Ma565
MaZc566
Ma567
Ma568
Ma569
Ma570
Ma571
Ma572
Ma573
Ma574
Ma575
Ma576
Ma577
Ma578
Ma579
Ma580
Ma581
Ma582
PE da Serra Furada
TI Carreteiro
APA da Baleia Franca
PE da Serra do Tabuleiro
TI Ligeiro
PE de Rondinha
TI Morro dos Cavalos
RESEX Pirajubaé
PE do Espigão Alto
PE Rio Canoas
ESEC de Carijós
APA Anhatomirim e Baía Norte
TI Mbiguaçu
TI Guarani Votouro
TI Votouro
TI Guarita
TI Nonoai/Rio da Várzea
REBIO da Canela Preta
REBIO Marinha do Arvoredo
PE Fritz Plaumann
TI Aldeia Kondá
PE do Turvo
PN da Serra do Itajaí
TI Toldo Chimbangue
TI Toldo Pinhal
TI Toldo Chimbangue II
FLONA Chapecó
FLONA de Ibirama
ARIE Serra da Abelha - Rio da Prata
TI Ibirama
REBIO do Sassafrás
PN das Araucárias
TI Xapecó
TI Toldo Imbu
RVS Campos de Palmas
13
6
544
930
45
10
20
17
14
11
8
124
0
7
34
234
164
18
174
7
23
170
575
10
49
10
16
5
16
371
47
129
163
19
163
EH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
H
H
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
H
H
VH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
H
H
EH
H
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
H
H
H
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
H
H
EH
H
H
H
H
H
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Orleans(SC)
Água Santa(RS)
Palhoça(SC)
Palhoça(SC)
Sananduva(RS)
Sarandi(RS)
Palhoça(SC)
Barracão(RS)
Campos Novos(SC)
Governador Celso Ramos(SC)
Biguaçu(SC)
Entre Rios do Sul(RS)
Erval Grande(RS)
Tenente Portela(RS)
Nonoai(RS)
Nova Trento(SC)
Concórdia(SC)
Chapecó(SC)
Esperança do Sul(RS)
Blumenau(SC)
Chapecó(SC)
Chapecó(SC)
Chapecó(SC)
Guatambú(SC)
Ibirama(SC)
Santa Terezinha(SC)
Rio Negrinho(SC)
Rio Negrinho(SC)
Ponte Serrada(SC)
Xanxerê(SC)
Abelardo Luz(SC)
Palmas(PR)
244
Ma583
Ma584
Ma585
Ma586
Ma587
MaZc588
Ma589
Ma590
Ma591
MaZc592
Ma593
MaZc594
MaZc595
Ma596
MaZc597
Ma598
MaZc599
MaZc600
MaZc601
Ma602
MaZc603
Ma604
Ma605
Ma606
MaZc607
MaZc608
Ma609
Ma610
Ma611
Ma612
Ma613
Ma614
Ma615
Ma616
Ma617
TI Palmas
TI Rio dos Pardos
ESEC da Mata Preta
PE de Palmas
PE das Araucárias
PE do Acarai
ESEC do Bracinho
FLONA Três Barras
FLOES de Santana
PE do Boguaçu
TI Mangueirinha
PE do Rio da Onça
APA de Guaratuba
PE do Monge
PN de Saint-Hilaire/Lange
TI Rio Areia
ESEC do Guaraguaçu
Parque da restinga de pontal
FLOES do Palmito
PE Professor José Wacchowicz
PE da Ilha do Mel
APA da Serra da Esperança
APA do Rio Pequeno
PE do Pau-Oco
TI Ilha da Cotinga
ESEC da Ilha do Mel
APA do Rio Piraquara
PE do Pico Marumbi
APA do Rio Verde
PE da Serra da Baitaca
APA do Rio Passauna
PE João Paulo II
PE da Graciosa
APA do Rio Irai
ESEC Fernandes Pinheiro
38
8
66
2
6
62
48
45
2
60
173
1
1,341
4
253
14
12
7
5
1
4
2,047
63
7
17
30
63
21
148
30
155
0
569
106
5
H
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
IK
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
H
H
EH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
H
EH
H
H
H
H
EH
H
H
VH
VH
VH
H
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
VH
VH
H
H
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Palmas(PR)
Porto União(SC)
Palmas(PR)
Palmas(PR)
São Domingos(SC)
São Francisco do Sul(SC)
Joinville(SC)
Três Barras(SC)
Paulo Frontin(PR)
Guaratuba(PR)
Coronel Vivida(PR)
Matinhos(PR)
São José dos Pinhais(PR)
Lapa(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Cruz Machado(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Araucária(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Guarapuava(PR)
São José dos Pinhais(PR)
Morretes(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Piraquara(PR)
Piraquara(PR)
Araucária(PR)
Piraquara(PR)
Curitiba(PR)
Curitiba(PR)
São José dos Pinhais(PR)
Colombo(PR)
Irati(PR)
245
MaZc618
Ma619
Ma620
Ma621
Ma622
Ma623
Ma624
MaZc625
Ma626
Ma627
Ma628
Ma629
MaZc630
Ma631
Ma632
Ma633
Ma634
Ma635
MaZc636
MaZc637
Ma638
MaZc639
Ma640
Ma641
Ma642
Ma643
Ma644
Ma645
Ma646
Ma647
Ma648
Ma649
MaZc650
Ma651
Ma652
PN do Superagui
PE do Rio Guarani
APA Serra do Mar
ESEC de Guaraqueçaba
FLONA Irati
PN do Iguaçu
PE Roberto Ribas Lange
APA Guaraqueçaba
PE Pico Paraná
REBIO das Araucárias
TI Rio das Cobras
PE de Vila Velha
PE Ilha do Cardoso
FLONA Açungui
RESEX do Mandira
PN dos Campos Gerais
PE de Campinhos
TI Marrecas
APA de Cananéia-Iguapé e Peruíbe
PE Jacupiranga
PE das Lauráceas
ESEC Chaúas
APA da Escarpa Devoniana
PE Campina do Encantado
PE do Caxambu
FLONA Piraí do Sul
TI Ivai
ARIE de São Domingos
PE Turístico Alto do Ribeira
TI Serra do Itatins
PE Intervales
APA da Serra do Mar - Núcleo
Pedro de Toledo
TI Piaçaguera
TI Piaçaguera
TI Peruíbe
340
21
558
54
38
1,697
30
2,427
43
150
187
33
131
6
12
213
2
169
1,265
1,491
279
27
2,546
31
11
2
73
0
359
12
404
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
H
EH
H
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
VH
H
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
H
VH
EH
H
VH
H
EH
VH
H
VH
H
H
H
VH
VH
VH
H
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Cananéia(SP)
Quedas do Iguaçu(PR)
São José dos Pinhais(PR)
Guaraqueçaba(PR)
Imbituva(PR)
Foz do Iguaçu(PR)
181
H
VH
Protected Area
Peruíbe(SP)
6
22
5
H
VH
H
H
EH
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Peruíbe(SP)
Itanhaém(SP)
Peruíbe(SP)
Campina Grande do Sul(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Campina Grande do Sul(PR)
Imbituva(PR)
Guaraniaçu(PR)
Ponta Grossa(PR)
Cananéia(SP)
Campo Largo(PR)
Cananéia(SP)
Ponta Grossa(PR)
Cerro Azul(PR)
Guarapuava(PR)
Iguape(SP)
Campina Grande do Sul(PR)
Bocaiúva do Sul(PR)
Iguape(SP)
Ponta Grossa(PR)
Iguape(SP)
Castro(PR)
Piraí do Sul(PR)
Pitanga(PR)
Roncador(PR)
Apiaí(SP)
Peruíbe(SP)
Capão Bonito(SP)
246
Ma653
Ma654
Ma655
Ma656
MaZc657
Ma658
Ma660
MaZc661
Ma662
MaZc663
Ma664
Ma665
MaZc666
Ma667
Ma668
Ma669
Ma670
Ma671
Ma672
MaZc673
MaZc674
Ma675
Ma676
MaZc677
Ma678
Ma679
Ma680
Ma681
Ma682
Ma683
Ma684
Ma685
Ma686
Ma687
Ma688
APA da Serra do Mar
PE Serra do Mar-N. Pedro de Toledo
REBio de São Camilo
TI Queimadas
TI Itaóca
PE Carlos Botelho
APA da Serra do Mar - Núcleo Curucutu
TI Guarani do Aguapeu
PE Serra do Mar-N. Curucutu
PE Xixová-Japuí
TI Rio Branco Itanhaém
PE do Lago Azul
PE Ilha Bela
PE Jurupará
TI Tibagy/Mococa
PE Serra do Mar-N. Cubatão
PE Ecológico Embu-Guaçu
TI Pirajuí
TI Potrero Guaçu
PE Serra do Mar-N. São Sebastião
TI Guarani do Ribeirão Silveira
PE Vila Rica do Espirito Santo
PE Guarapiranga
PE Serra do Mar-N. Caraguatatuba
REBIO das Perobas
TI Apucarana
TI São Jeronimo
TI Porto Lindo
TI Takuaraty/Yvykuarusu
PE do Penhasco Verde
TI Pau Brasil
TI Arroio-Korá
TI Barão de Antonina
PN de Ilha Grande
PE Alberto Lofgren
2,146
497
1
30
5
403
53
44
279
6
29
45
295
264
8
668
1
20
40
338
86
3
3
429
87
56
14
95
26
3
24
69
38
1,079
2
H
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
IK
IK
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
IK
IK
VH
H
H
H
EH
VH
VH
EH
H
VH
H
VH
VH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
H
H
H
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
H
VH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Ibiúna(SP)
Itanhaém(SP)
Palotina(PR)
Ortigueira(PR)
Mongaguá(SP)
Capão Bonito(SP)
Itanhaém(SP)
Itanhaém(SP)
São Paulo(SP)
São Vicente(SP)
São Paulo(SP)
Campo Mourão(PR)
Ilhabela(SP)
Ibiúna(SP)
Ortigueira(PR)
São Paulo(SP)
São Paulo(SP)
Sete Quedas(MS)
Paranhos(MS)
Caraguatatuba(SP)
São Sebastião(SP)
Fênix(PR)
São Paulo(SP)
Caraguatatuba(SP)
Cianorte(PR)
Londrina(PR)
São Jerônimo da Serra(PR)
Iguatemi(MS)
Sete Quedas(MS)
São Jerônimo da Serra(PR)
Tacuru(MS)
Paranhos(MS)
Londrina(PR)
Naviraí(MS)
São Paulo(SP)
247
Ma689
MaZc690
Ma691
Ma692
Ma693
Ma694
Ma695
MaZc696
Ma697
MaZc698
Ma699
Ma700
Ma701
Ma702
MaZc703
Ma704
MaZc705
MaZc706
MaZc707
MaZc708
MaZc709
MaZc710
MaZc711
MaZc712
MaZc713
MaZc714
MaZc715
MaZc716
MaZc717
Ma718
MaZc719
MaZc720
MaZc721
Ma722
Ma723
PE Jaraguá
PE Serra do Mar-N. Picinguaba
TI Pinhalzinho
PE Serra do Mar-N. Santa Virgínia
TI Sassoró
TI Cerrito
TI Sete Cerros
TI Guarani Araponga
PE Cantareira
APA de Cairuçu
FLONA de Ipanema
PE Serra do Mar-N. Cunhá-Indaiá
PE Juquery
ESEC Angatuba
PE Marinho do Aventureiro
PE da Mata do Godoy
PE da Ilha Grande
REBIO Estadual da Praia do Sul
RESEX Marinha do Arraial do Cabo
APA de Tamoios
REBIO e Arqueológica de Guaratiba
ESEC de Tamoios
APA de Maricá
APA de Massambaba
PE da Serra da Tiririca
PN da Tijuca
APA do Pau Brasil
PE da Pedra Branca
UC Darcy Ribeiro
PE de Ibiporã
PN da Serra da Bocaina
APA da Serra de Sapiatiba
APA de Mangaratiba
TI Taquaperi
PE da Mata São Francisco
5
509
6
165
19
19
88
2
77
322
54
76
20
14
18
7
44
35
526
104
37
214
10
110
23
35
107
127
49
1
939
61
248
18
7
VH
EH
H
EH
IK
IK
IK
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
IK
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
H
H
H
EH
EH
EH
H
H
EH
H
VH
H
VH
H
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
VH
H
VH
VH
EH
H
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
São Paulo(SP)
Caraguatatuba(SP)
Tomazina(PR)
Caraguatatuba(SP)
Iguatemi(MS)
Eldorado(MS)
Paranhos(MS)
Ubatuba(SP)
São Paulo(SP)
Ubatuba(SP)
Araçoiaba da Serra(SP)
Ubatuba(SP)
Franco da Rocha(SP)
Angatuba(SP)
Londrina(PR)
Cabo Frio(RJ)
Rio de Janeiro(RJ)
Angra dos Reis(RJ)
Maricá(RJ)
Araruama(RJ)
São Gonçalo(RJ)
Rio de Janeiro(RJ)
Cabo Frio(RJ)
Rio de Janeiro(RJ)
São Gonçalo(RJ)
Ibiporã(PR)
Angra dos Reis(RJ)
São Pedro da Aldeia(RJ)
Angra dos Reis(RJ)
Coronel Sapucaia(MS)
Cornélio Procópio(PR)
248
MaZc724
Ma725
Ma726
MaZc727
MaZc728
Ma729
Ma730
MaZc731
Ma732
Ma733
Ma734
Ma735
MaZc736
Ma737
Ma738
Ma739
Ma740
Ma741
Ma742
Ma743
Ma744
MaZc745
Ma746
Ma747
Ma748
Ma749
Ma750
Ma751
Ma752
Ma753
Ma754
Ma755
Ma756
Ma757
MaZc758
TI Guarani de Bracui
FLOES Piraju
APA do Gericono-Mendanha
ESEC da Guanabara
APA de Guapi-Mirim
TI Guasuti
FLOES Manduri
ESEC Bananal
TI Amambai
TI Jaguari
FLONA Mário Xavier
PE Mananciais
APA da Bacia do Rio São
João/Mico-Leão-Dourado
FLONA de Lorena
REBIO Nacional de Poço das Antas
APA Ilhas e Várzeas do Rio Paraná
APA Fernão Dias
APAs Sapucaí - Campos do Jordão
TI Jarará
REBIO do Tinguá
PE Campos do Jordão
REBIO União
ESEC do Paraíso
TI Guaimbé
TI Rancho Jacaré
PN da Serra dos Órgãos
APA da Região Serrana de Petrópolis
PE do Ivinhema
APA/APP da Floresta do Jacarandá
PE dos Tres Picos
REBIO de Araras
PE de Ibicatu
APA de Macaé de Cima
APA dos Frades
PN da Restinga de Jurubatiba
22
7
81
20
122
9
15
9
24
4
5
5
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
IK
VH
H
IK
IK
H
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
VH
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Angra dos Reis(RJ)
Piraju(SP)
Rio de Janeiro(RJ)
São Gonçalo(RJ)
São Gonçalo(RJ)
Aral Moreira(MS)
Manduri(SP)
Bananal(SP)
Amambaí(MS)
Amambaí(MS)
Japeri(RJ)
Pindamonhangaba(SP)
1,536
EH
H
Protected Area
Nova Friburgo(RJ)
3
52
8,446
1,807
202
5
252
82
30
50
7
8
107
519
529
9
471
22
1
316
32
152
H
EH
EH
EH
H
IK
EH
EH
EH
EH
IK
IK
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
H
H
VH
H
H
H
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
H
EH
EH
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Lorena(SP)
Casimiro de Abreu(RJ)
Naviraí(MS)
São José dos Campos(SP)
Pindamonhangaba(SP)
Juti(MS)
Duque de Caxias(RJ)
Pindamonhangaba(SP)
Macaé(RJ)
Teresópolis(RJ)
Aral Moreira(MS)
Laguna Carapã(MS)
Petrópolis(RJ)
Duque de Caxias(RJ)
Naviraí(MS)
Teresópolis(RJ)
Nova Friburgo(RJ)
Petrópolis(RJ)
Porecatu(PR)
Nova Friburgo(RJ)
Teresópolis(RJ)
Macaé(RJ)
249
Ma759
Ma760
Ma761
Ma762
Ma763
Ma764
Ma765
Ma766
Ma767
Ma768
Ma769
Ma770
Ma771
Ma772
Ma773
Ma774
Ma775
PE da Serra da Concórdia
FLONA Passa Quatro
APA da Serra da Mantiqueira
PN Itatiaia
ESEC do Caiuá
PE Morro do Diabo
FLOES Edmundo Navarro
TI Caieras Velha
ESEC Caetetus
ESEC Mogi Guaçu
PE Serra do Papagaio
ESEC do Mico Leão Preto
PE do Desengano
ESEC Mar de Espanha
PE Nova Baden
PE Ibitipoca
PE Porto Ferreira
MaZc776
ESEC de Guaxindiba
Ma777
Ma778
Ma779
Ma780
MaZc781
Ma782
Ma783
Ma784
MaZc785
MaZc786
Ma787
Ma788
Ma789
Ma790
Ma791
MaZc792
Ma793
REBIO Lapinha
PE Vassununga
PE Rio do Peixe
TI Icatu
APA de Guanandy
APA Serra São José
PE Aguapeí
FLONA de Pacotuba - Cafundó
APA de Setiba
PE Paulo César Vinha
PE de Mata das Flores
PE Serra do Brigadeiro
PE de Forno Grande
PE de Pedra Azul
PN de Caparaó
PE da Fonte Grande
ReBio de Duas Bocas
10
3
3,923
284
16
366
22
114
23
10
232
63
218
2
2
15
7
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
33
EH
EH
Protected Area
4
20
77
3
52
71
91
309
110
17
3
134
8
10
324
2
32
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
H
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Valença(RJ)
Passa Quatro(MG)
Pindamonhangaba(SP)
Resende(RJ)
Diamante do Norte(PR)
Teodoro Sampaio(SP)
Rio Claro(SP)
Caarapó(MS)
Gália(SP)
Mogi Guaçu(SP)
Baependi(MG)
Presidente Epitácio(SP)
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
Mar de Espanha(MG)
Lambari(MG)
Lima Duarte(MG)
Porto Ferreira(SP)
São Francisco de
Itabapoana(RJ)
Leopoldina(MG)
Descalvado(SP)
Dracena(SP)
Braúna(SP)
Marataízes(ES)
São João del Rei(MG)
Junqueirópolis(SP)
Cachoeiro de Itapemirim(ES)
Vila Velha(ES)
Guarapari(ES)
Castelo(ES)
Muriaé(MG)
Castelo(ES)
Domingos Martins(ES)
Iúna(ES)
Vitória(ES)
Cariacica(ES)
250
MaZc794
Ma795
Ma796
Ma797
MaZc798
Ma799
Ma800
Ma801
MaZc802
Ma803
Ma804
MaZc805
Ma806
Ma807
MaZc808
MaZc809
Ma810
Ma811
MaZc812
Ma813
Ma814
Ma815
Ma816
Ma817
Ma818
MaZc819
MaZc820
MaZc821
Ma822
MaZc823
Ma824
Ma825
Ma826
APA de Praia Mole
PE Itacolomi
APA Seminário Menor de Mariana
ESEC Mata do Cedro
APA de Mestre Álvaro
ESEC Tripuí
APA Cachoeira das Andorinhas
ESEC Corumbá
TI Caieiras Velha
APA de Goiapaba-Açu
REBIO Augusto Ruschi
TI Pau Brasil (ES)
ESEC Córrego dos Fechos
PE Serra Rola-Moça
TI Comboios
REBIO de Comboios
PE do Rio Doce
PE Paulo de Faria
FLONA de Goytacazes
PE Sete Salões
TI Krenak
PN dos Pontões Capixabas
REBIO de Sooretama
PE Rio Corrente
TI Fazenda Guarani
APA de Conceição da Barra
PE de Itaúnas
FLONA do Rio Preto
REBIO do Córrego do Veado
REBIO do Córrego Grande
PE Pico do Itambé
APA Águas Vertentes
PE Serra Negra
Ma827
ESEC Mata dos Ausentes
Ma828
PN do Descobrimento
4
76
3
10
26
5
229
3
31
36
36
16
6
41
25
8
366
4
14
137
41
179
286
53
35
81
50
30
25
16
48
725
142
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
IK
VH
EH
EH
IK
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
VH
VH
H
EH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
10
EH
EH
Protected Area
216
EH
EH
Protected Area
Serra(ES)
Ouro Preto(MG)
Mariana(MG)
Carmópolis de Minas(MG)
Serra(ES)
Ouro Preto(MG)
Ouro Preto(MG)
Arcos(MG)
Aracruz(ES)
Santa Teresa(ES)
Santa Teresa(ES)
Aracruz(ES)
Nova Lima(MG)
Belo Horizonte(MG)
Aracruz(ES)
Linhares(ES)
Ipatinga(MG)
Paulo de Faria(SP)
Linhares(ES)
Conselheiro Pena(MG)
Resplendor(MG)
Pancas(ES)
Linhares(ES)
Açucena(MG)
Dores de Guanhães(MG)
São Mateus(ES)
Mucuri(BA)
Conceição da Barra(ES)
Pinheiros(ES)
Mucuri(BA)
Serro(MG)
Diamantina(MG)
Itamarandiba(MG)
Senador Modestino
Gonçalves(MG)
Prado(BA)
251
MaZc829
MaZc830
Ma831
MaZc832
MaZc833
Ma834
Ma835
MaZc836
MaZc837
MaZc838
MaZc839
MaZc840
Ma841
Ma842
MaZc843
PN e Histórico do Monte Pascoal
APA Caraíva/Trancoso
PN do Pau Brasil
APA Coroa Vermelha
APA Santo Antônio
REBIO da Mata Escura
REBIO de Una
APA Lagoa Encantada e Rio Almada
MaZc857
MaZc858
PE Serra do Conduru
APA Costa de Itacaré/Serra Grande
APA Baía de Camamu
APA Pratigi
ESEC Weneceslau Guimarães
Serras de Wenceslau Guimarães
APA Tinharé Boipeba
APA Caminhos Ecológicos da Boa
Esperança
APA Baía de Todos os Santos (Ilha
de Itaparica e Recifes Costeiros)
APA Baía de Todos os Santos
(Costões Rochosos de Salvador)
APA Lagoas e Dunas do Abaeté
APA Bacia do Cobre S. Bartolomeu
APA Baía de Todos os Santos
APA Rio Capivara
APA Baía de Todos os Santos (BTS
Petroquímica)
RESEX Marinha da Baia de Iguapé
APA Joanes Ipitanga
APA Lagoas de Guarajuba
APA Lago de Pedra do Cavalo
APA Plataforma Continental do
Litoral Norte
APA Litoral Norte do Estado da Baía
APA Mangue Seco
MaZc859
FLONA Ibura
MaZc844
MaZc845
MaZc846
MaZc847
MaZc848
MaZc849
MaZc850
MaZc851
MaZc852
MaZc853
MaZc854
Ma855
MaZc856
230
206
118
30
54
521
109
997
97
557
1,028
955
25
1,204
321
EH
H
EH
IK
IK
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Porto Seguro(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Santa Cruz Cabrália(BA)
Almenara(MG)
Una(BA)
Ilhéus(BA)
Ilhéus(BA)
Ubaitaba(BA)
Camamu(BA)
Camamu(BA)
Wenceslau Guimarães(BA)
Valença(BA)
Cairu(BA)
1,147
EH
EH
Protected Area
Valença(BA)
354
EH
EH
Creation PA – undefined category
Vera Cruz(BA)
34
EH
H
Planning and regularization
Salvador(BA)
13
11
818
18
H
IK
VH
H
H
H
VH
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Salvador(BA)
Salvador(BA)
Salvador(BA)
Camaçari(BA)
242
H
H
Protected Area
Salvador(BA)
85
670
20
689
IK
H
H
IK
EH
H
H
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Maragogipe(BA)
Salvador(BA)
Camaçari(BA)
Feira de Santana(BA)
3,593
EH
VH
Protected Area
Camaçari(BA)
788
151
H
EH
H
EH
Protected Area
Creation PA - undefined category
H
H
Camaçari(BA)
Estância(SE)
Nossa Senhora do
Socorro(SE)
2
Protected Area
252
Ma860
MaZc861
MaZc862
MaZc863
MaZc864
MaZc865
MaZc866
Ma867
Ma868
MaZc869
MaZc870
MaZc871
MaZc872
MaZc873
MaZc874
MaZc875
MaZc876
Ma877
Ma878
Ma879
MaZc880
MaZc881
MaZc882
MaZc883
MaZc885
MaZc886
PN Serra de Itabaiana
REBIO de Santa Isabel
APA de Piaçabuçu
RESEX Marinha da Lagoa do Jequiá
RESEC Manguezais da Lagoa do
Roteiro
RESEC Saco da Pedra
APA da Costa dos Corais
ESEC de Murici
REBIO de Pedra Talhada
REBIO de Saltinho
APA Estadual de Guadalupe
PE do Jacarapé
PE de Aratu
FLONA da Restinga do Cabedelo
PE Marinho de Areia Vermelha
APA da Barra do Rio Mamanguape
ARIE Manguezais da Foz do Rio
Mamanguape
REBIO de Guaribas
PE Pau-Brasil
FLONA de Nísia Floresta
PE das Dunas de Natal
APA Estadual dos Recifes de Corais
APA Jericoacoara
ESEC Juréia-Itatins
ARIE Queimada Grande e
Queimada Pequena
PE Ilha Anchieta
83
43
95
107
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
H
EH
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Itabaiana(SE)
Pacatuba(SE)
Piaçabuçu(AL)
Coruripe(AL)
8
EH
EH
Protected Area
Roteiro(AL)
2
4,256
64
39
6
372
4
4
1
2
96
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
IK
IK
H
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Creation sustainable use PA
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
Marechal Deodoro(AL)
Maceió(AL)
Murici(AL)
Quebrangulo(AL)
Rio Formoso(PE)
Barreiros(PE)
João Pessoa(PB)
João Pessoa(PB)
João Pessoa(PB)
Rio Tinto(PB)
61
EH
EH
Protected Area
Rio Tinto(PB)
28
4
2
17
1,410
1
799
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
H
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Mamanguape(PB)
Mamanguape(PB)
Nísia Floresta(RN)
Natal(RN)
Touros(RN)
Jijoca de Jericoacoara(CE)
Peruíbe(SP)
1
EH
EH
Protected Area
8
EH
EH
Protected Area
Pampas Biome
Table 11.9.6 – List of Priority Areas for the Pampas Biome with: area code, size (km2), biological importance (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high, IK –
insufficiently known), urgency for action (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high), main priority action recommended,and main municipality.
Size (km2) Importance Priority Priority Action
Main Municipality
Area code Name
PpZc001
Sistema Arroio Del Rey
687
H
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Santa Vitória do Palmar(RS)
253
Pp002
PpZc003
PpZc004
Pp005
PpZc006
Pp007
PpZc008
PpZc009
Pp010
Pp011
PpZc012
PpZc013
Pp014
Pp015
Pp016
Pp017
PpZc018
Pp019
PpZc020
Pp021
Pp022
Pp023
Pp024
Pp025
Pp026
PpZc027
PpZc028
Pp029
Pp030
Pp031
Pp032
Pp033
Pp034
Pp035
Foz do Arroio Juncal e Jaguarão
Banhado do Mundo Novo
Banhado do Maçarico e cordões
litorâneos anexos
Campos de Jaguarão
Várzea do Canal de S Gonçalo
Mata Ciliar do Rio Piratini
Banhado de Estreito
Estuário da Laguna dos Patos
Várzeas do Alto Jaguarão
Coxilha de Pedras Altas
Sistema Lagoa Pequena
Sistema Bujuru
Campos de Candiota e Hulha Negra
Ponche Verde
Fragmentos da Serra dos Tapés
Altos de Canguçu
Expansion of Parque Camaquã
Palmas
Lagoa dos Patos
Mata Ciliar do Baixo Rio Camaquã
Santana da Boa Vista
Camaquã-Chico
Santa Maria Corridor
Guaritas
Quaraí
Campos de dunas e lagoas cost. do
litoral médio
Butiazais de Tapes
Campo Seco
Serra do Herval
Upamaroti
Encruzilhada
Ilha do Barba Negra
Morro da Formiga
Arroio dos Lanceiros
155
237
H
EH
VH
VH
Mosaic/Corridor
Inventory
Jaguarão(RS)
Arroio Grande(RS)
875
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Rio Grande(RS)
4,145
945
94
174
1,028
545
1,505
371
246
447
5,505
262
660
191
2,287
8,016
417
1,819
1,765
197
3,621
3,260
VH
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
VH
IK
EH
EH
H
EH
H
H
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
H
H
EH
EH
H
EH
H
H
EH
VH
VH
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA - undefined category
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Jaguarão(RS)
Pelotas(RS)
Capão do Leão(RS)
São José do Norte(RS)
Pelotas(RS)
Candiota(RS)
Piratini(RS)
Pelotas(RS)
São José do Norte(RS)
Pinheiro Machado(RS)
Bagé(RS)
Pelotas(RS)
Canguçu(RS)
Camaquã(RS)
Bagé(RS)
Viamão(RS)
Camaquã(RS)
Canguçu(RS)
São Gabriel(RS)
São Gabriel(RS)
Bagé(RS)
Santana do Livramento(RS)
847
VH
H
Mosaic/Corridor
Tramandaí(RS)
216
536
974
3,320
3,210
24
4
3,620
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
H
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
H
VH
Creation PA - undefined category
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Inventory
Fostering sustainable use
Fostering sustainable use
Environmental Education
Mosaic/Corridor
Tapes(RS)
São Gabriel(RS)
Camaquã(RS)
Santana do Livramento(RS)
Cachoeira do Sul(RS)
Barra do Ribeiro(RS)
Barra do Ribeiro(RS)
Cachoeira do Sul(RS)
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Fostering sustainable use
Mosaic/Corridor
Inventory
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA - undefined category
254
PpZc036
PpZc037
Pp038
Pp039
PpZc040
Pp041
PpZc042
Pp043
Pp044
Pp045
Pp046
Pp047
Pp048
Pp049
Pp050
PpZc051
Pp052
Pp053
Pp054
Pp055
Pp056
PpZc057
Pp058
Pp059
Pp060
Pp061
Pp062
Pp063
PpZc064
Pp065
Pp066
Lagoa do Casamento e Ecossist.
associados
Butiazais de Palmares do Sul
Serra das Quitérias
Barra do Quaraí
Morro de Santana - PE Ecological
Corridor
Cerro do Jarau
Dunas móveis de Cidreira
Areias Brancas
Parque do Espinilho Corridor
Campos do Pantano Grande
Caverá
Pai Passo
Caiboaté
Campos de Butiá
Espinilho Guaraputan
Sistema Lagunar Tramandaí-Armazém
Saicã
Banhado Grande/Banh. dos
Pachecos Corridor
Entorno Baixo Jacui - Região
Carbonífera
Entorno ReBio do Ibirapuitã
Nascentes próximas a São Vicente
do Sul
Áreas úmidas ao norte de Tramandaí
Região da APA Osório/Caraá
Remanescentes de Floresta Estacional
Uruguaiana
São Pedro / Chiniquá
São Vicente do Sul
Bugio preto
Região de Itapeva
Rio Ibicuí Corridor
Barra do Ibicuí
645
VH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
Viamão(RS)
78
653
149
H
VH
EH
H
H
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Palmares do Sul(RS)
Butiá(RS)
Barra do Quaraí(RS)
239
H
EH
Creation full protection PA
Porto Alegre(RS)
239
133
688
98
1,898
1,411
3,626
883
67
221
56
712
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
H
VH
H
EH
EH
H
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Environmental Education
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Inventory
Mosaic/Corridor
Planning and regularization
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Uruguaiana(RS)
Tramandaí(RS)
São Gabriel(RS)
Barra do Quaraí(RS)
Cachoeira do Sul(RS)
Alegrete(RS)
Uruguaiana(RS)
Uruguaiana(RS)
Butiá(RS)
Uruguaiana(RS)
Osório(RS)
Rosário do Sul(RS)
194
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Viamão(RS)
420
EH
EH
Recuperation
Rio Pardo(RS)
417
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Alegrete(RS)
1,865
H
EH
Recuperation
São Gabriel(RS)
300
53
46
627
1,759
1,337
959
120
1,373
828
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
H
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Creation PA - undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA - undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Osório(RS)
Santo Antônio da Patrulha(RS)
Santo Antônio da Patrulha(RS)
Uruguaiana(RS)
Santa Maria(RS)
São Francisco de Assis(RS)
Alegrete(RS)
Torres(RS)
Alegrete(RS)
Uruguaiana(RS)
255
Pp067
Pp068
PpZc069
Pp070
PpZc071
Pp072
Pp073
Pp074
Pp075
Pp076
Pp077
Pp078
Pp079
Pp080
Pp081
Pp082
Pp083
Pp084
Pp085
Pp086
Pp087
Pp088
PpZc089
PpZc090
PpZc091
PpZc092
PpZc093
PpZc094
Pp095
Pp096
PpZc097
Pp098
Pp099
PpZc100
São Martinho
Itu-Puitã Corridor
Complexo Lagoa do Forno e Jacaré
(Costeiro)
Guaçupi
Remanescente próximo a Torres
Barna de Bode
Região de Jari
Região de Santiago
Rio Jaguari
Arroio Tipiaia
Unistalda
Nascentes do Rio Butuí
Nascentes do Rio Jaguari
Entorno REBIO São Donato
Jóia
Icamacuã Corridor
Campo das Missões Corridor
Sanga Laranjeira
Arroio Xuni
Santo Antonio das Missões
Uruguai - Missões Corridor
Garruchos
ESEC do Taim
ARIE Pontal dos Latinos e Pontal do
Santiago
REBIO da Mata Grande
PN Lagoa do Peixe
PE do Camaquã
TI da Pacheca
PE do Podocarpus
APA do Ibirapuitã
PE Itapuã
PE do Espinilho
RVS Banhado dos Pachecos
PE Delta do Jacuí
59
2,376
H
EH
H
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Júlio de Castilhos(RS)
Itaqui(RS)
3
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Torres(RS)
484
2
85
487
606
367
377
1,193
933
440
1,145
196
1,508
506
1,738
243
273
546
236
1,113
VH
H
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
IK
H
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
H
VH
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
VH
H
EH
VH
H
EH
H
Creation PA - undefined category
Recuperation
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA - undefined category
Inventory
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Protected Area
Júlio de Castilhos(RS)
Torres(RS)
Júlio de Castilhos(RS)
Tupanciretã(RS)
Santiago(RS)
Santiago(RS)
Tupanciretã(RS)
Santiago(RS)
São Borja(RS)
Tupanciretã(RS)
São Borja(RS)
Jóia(RS)
São Borja(RS)
Bossoroca(RS)
Santiago(RS)
Entre-Ijuís(RS)
Bossoroca(RS)
São Borja(RS)
São Nicolau(RS)
Rio Grande(RS)
H
H
Protected Area
Santa Vitória do Palmar(RS)
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Rio Grande(RS)
Mostardas(RS)
Camaquã(RS)
Camaquã(RS)
Encruzilhada do Sul(RS)
Santana do Livramento(RS)
Viamão(RS)
Barra do Quaraí(RS)
Viamão(RS)
Porto Alegre(RS)
30
47
368
56
22
39
3,168
60
16
26
227
256
Pp101
Pp102
PpZc103
PpZc104
Pp105
APA do Banhado Grande
REBIO do Ibirapuitã
PE de Itapeva
PE Acarai
REBIO de São Donato
1,152
4
10
22
135
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
H
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Porto Alegre(RS)
Alegrete(RS)
Torres(RS)
Torres(RS)
São Borja(RS)
Coastal Zone
Table 11.9.7 – List of Priority Areas for the Coastal Zone with: area code, size (km2), biological importance (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high, IK –
insufficiently known), urgency for action (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high), main priority action recommended, and main municipality. NOTE: These areas
are also listed in their respective terrestrial biome list (Amazon, Cerrado, Caatinga, Atlantic Forest, and Pampas).
Size (km2) Importance Priority Priority Action
Main Municipality
Area code Name
AmZc182
APAs Maranhão Corridor
1,258
H
H
Recuperation
São Luís(MA)
AmZc184
Leste da Baía de São José
8,536
EH
EH
Watershed Management
São Luís(MA)
AmZc186
Baixada
3,126
H
VH
Mosaic/Corridor
Pinheiro(MA)
AmZc190
Ilha dos Caranguejos
484
VH
EH
Inventory
Santa Rita(MA)
Creation PA - undefined category
AmZc196
Guarapiranga
38
H
VH
São Luís(MA)
AmZc197
MA-05
171
H
H
Planning and regularization
São Luís(MA)
Creation PA - undefined category
AmZc200
Manguezais e várzeas do Rio Anil
20
H
EH
São Luís(MA)
Creation PA - undefined category
AmZc202
Turiaçu Corridor
4,692
H
H
Turiaçu(MA)
AmZc203
Portel
22,477
VH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
Portel(PA)
Creation PA - undefined category
AmZc205
Curupu/Panaquatira
123
VH
EH
São José de Ribamar(MA)
AmZc206
RESEX Baia do Tubarão
1,119
EH
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Icatu(MA)
AmZc209
Lago Quebra Pote
1,192
VH
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Santa Helena(MA)
AmZc214
Ilhas do baixo Tocantins
1,117
IK
EH
Recuperation
Cametá(PA)
AmZc215
Baixo Tocantins - Limoeiro
4,467
EH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
Abaetetuba(PA)
Fisheries Planning and regularization Abaetetuba(PA)
AmZc220
Foz do Rio Tocantins
1,824
EH
EH
AmZc228
Gurupá - Porto de Moz
4,153
EH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
Gurupá(PA)
Sul APA Baixada Maranhense AmZc229
1,082
VH
VH
Recuperation
Viseu(PA)
Divisa MA/PA
AmZc230
Açaí do Marajó
5,140
EH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
Muaná(PA)
AmZc231
Cachoeira - Ponta de Pedras
586
EH
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Muaná(PA)
AmZc232
Acará
2,511
VH
EH
Planning and regularization
Belém(PA)
Sistema Foz do Gurupi e Baía de
AmZc236
2,670
EH
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Viseu(PA)
Turiaçu
AmZc237
Região das Ilhas - Breves
5,605
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Breves(PA)
257
AmZc239
AmZc241
AmZc243
AmZc244
AmZc248
AmZc249
AmZc250
AmZc251
AmZc252
AmZc253
AmZc254
Ilhas de Belém
Cavernas da Serra do Piriá
Mapuá Corridor
PA-24
Expansion of Resex Marinha Arai
Peroba
PA-04
Área Central do Marajó
PA-23
Expansion of Resex Marinha
Caeté Taperaçu
Full Protection of Marajó
Campos alagados de Tracuateua
e Bragança
PA-08
AmZc255
AmZc256
AmZc259
AmZc261
AmZc262
AmZc263
AmZc264
AmZc265
AmZc267
AmZc268
AmZc270
AmZc272
AmZc274
AmZc275
Vale do Jari
Aramã / Anajás
Pirabas - Rei Sabá
Maguari Corridor
Anajás Corridor
P.A.E. da Ilha da Cinza
Mexiana Caviana I
Canal da Tartaruga
AmZc276
Santana / Mazagão
AmZc277
P.A. Maracá
Baias do Iboraí/ Urumajó e do Caeté
Bacia do Arari
PA-22
Litoral de Salvaterra
Braço sul do arquipélago de Marajó
AmZc281
Macapá / Santana
AmZc284
AmZc285
AmZc289
AmZc290
Mexiana Caviana II
Braço norte do arquipélago de Marajó
Bacia Matapi
Ninhal de Lontra
830
421
931
1,110
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
Planning and regularization
Creation full protection PA
62
EH
EH
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Augusto Corrêa(PA)
6,476
3,245
1,523
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Recuperation
Breves(PA)
Breves(PA)
Bragança(PA)
30
VH
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Bragança(PA)
1,376
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Muaná(PA)
384
EH
EH
3,441
316
3,903
1,925
115
4,104
2,719
1,653
518
418
7,111
42
3,448
2,810
H
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
H
H
VH
EH
EH
H
H
VH
H
211
5,746
217
6,408
7,521
5,862
386
H
H
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
VH
Creation PA - undefined category
Recuperation
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Belém(PA)
Viseu(PA)
Breves(PA)
Bragança(PA)
Bragança(PA)
Creation sustainable use PA
Belém(PA)
Augusto Corrêa(PA)
Mosaic/Corridor
Muaná(PA)
Recuperation
Salinópolis(PA)
Creation sustainable use PA
Soure(PA)
Fisheries Planning and regularization Belém(PA)
Creation PA - undefined category
Almeirim(PA)
Creation sustainable use PA
Anajás(PA)
Creation sustainable use PA
São João de Pirabas(PA)
Creation full protection PA
Soure(PA)
Mosaic/Corridor
Breves(PA)
Recuperation
Gurupá(PA)
Creation sustainable use PA
Anajás(PA)
Creation sustainable use PA
Soure(PA)
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Recognition Indigenous/Quilombola
Lands
Planning and regularization
Recognition Indigenous/Quilombola
Lands
Creation sustainable use PA
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Watershed Management
Creation sustainable use PA
Santana(AP)
Laranjal do Jari(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Afuá(PA)
Macapá(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Macapá(AP)
258
AmZc297
AmZc300
AmZc305
AmZc306
AmZc308
AmZc309
AmZc312
AmZc313
AmZc315
AmZc316
AmZc317
AmZc318
AmZc321
AmZc322
AmZc611
AmZc641
AmZc645
AmZc682
AmZc683
AmZc686
AmZc688
AmZc689
AmZc690
AmZc704
AmZc712
AmZc714
AmZc717
AmZc722
AmZc724
AmZc729
AmZc730
AmZc731
Bacia da Pedreira
P.A. Itaubal
Bacia do Gurijuba
Bailique
Pororoca
Apurema II
Apurema
Entorno da REBIO do Lago Piratuba
P.A. Cujubim
Ponta do Lago Piratuba
P.A. Piquiá do Amapá
Canal do Varadouro
Cerrado do Rio Amapá Grande
Litoral de Calçoene
APA Baixada Maranhense - Baixo
Mearim
APA Baixada Maranhense - baixo
Pindaré
RESEX dos Lagos de Penalva
RESEX do Taim
APA Upaon-açu / Miritiba / Alto
Preguiça (Oeste)
PE do Bacanga
APA Baixada Maranhense - Estuário
APA do Maracanã
APA do Itapiracá
RESEX Cedral/Guimarães/Porto
Rico/Alcatara
RESEX do Quilombo do Frechal
FLONA de Caxiuanã
APA Baixada Maranhense - Litoral
RESEX de Cururupu
RESEX Terra Grande Pracuúba
RESEX Mapuá
RESEX Marinha Araí Peroba
RESEX Marinha Gurupi Piriá
2,749
134
2,808
410
758
1,097
3,126
3,678
107
888
43
476
2,188
2,479
H
H
H
H
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
3,534
EH
2,195
Planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Planning and regularization
Creation sustainable use PA
Macapá(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Macapá(AP)
Amapá(AP)
Amapá(AP)
Pracuúba(AP)
Amapá(AP)
Amapá(AP)
Amapá(AP)
Amapá(AP)
Amapá(AP)
EH
Protected Area
Bacabal(MA)
VH
EH
Protected Area
Santa Inês(MA)
187
30
VH
H
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Penalva(MA)
São Luís(MA)
6,115
EH
EH
Protected Area
São Luís(MA)
13
11,046
10
11
H
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
São Luís(MA)
São Luís(MA)
São Luís(MA)
São Luís(MA)
772
EH
EH
Protected Area
Cururupu(MA)
89
3,229
6,096
1,870
1,806
574
118
748
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
H
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Mirinzal(MA)
Portel(PA)
São Luís(MA)
Cururupu(MA)
Breves(PA)
Breves(PA)
Viseu(PA)
Viseu(PA)
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA - undefined category
Recuperation
Recuperation
Planning and regularization
Creation full protection PA
Planning and regularization
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA - undefined category
259
AmZc732
AmZc733
AmZc734
AmZc735
AmZc736
AmZc739
AmZc740
AmZc741
AmZc743
AmZc744
AmZc745
AmZc746
AmZc748
AmZc751
AmZc753
AmZc757
AmZc763
AmZc771
AmZc776
AmZc798
AmZc801
AmZc806
AmZc807
AmZc812
CeZc246
CeZc247
CeZc248
CeZc249
CeZc250
CeZc251
CeZc315
CeZc429
CeZc430
CeZc431
CeZc432
APA Costa do Urumajó (Municipal)
RESEX Ituquara
RESEX Chocoaré-Mato Grosso
RESEX Marinha Caeté Taperaçu
RESEX Marinha Tracuateua
APA da Ilha Canela (Municipal)
RESEX Quatipuru
RESEX Itatupã-Baquiá
RESEX de Maracanã
RESEX Lago Arari
RESEX Mãe Grande de Curuçá
RESEX do Rio Cajari
RESEX de Itatupã
RESEX Foz do Rio Amazonas
RESEX Marinha Machadinho
APA do Rio Curiaú
REBIO Parazinho
REBIO do Lago Piratuba
ESEC de Maracá-Jipióca
TI Uaçá
PN do Cabo Orange
TI Galibi
TI Juminá
RESEX Marinha de Soure
Baías das Canárias
Sul da APA Foz do Rio Preguiças
Expansion of RESEX do Delta
Ilha do Caju
Norte da APA Foz do Rio Preguiças
MA-06
PN dos Lençois Maranhenses
RESEX Lago da Taboa
APA Foz do Rio
Preguiças/Peq.Lençois
RESEX Marinha do Delta do Parnaíba
APA Foz do Rio Preguiças
288
1,276
28
429
276
5
235
660
318
1,582
335
5,025
585
3,092
825
187
5
3,943
600
4,711
6,456
43
320
153
391
41
283
81
174
72
1,389
157
EH
IK
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
H
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
H
EH
H
VH
VH
EH
EH
H
VH
H
EH
VH
H
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Recuperation
Inventory
Recuperation
Inventory
Creation sustainable use PA
Environmental Education
Protected Area
Protected Area
Bragança(PA)
Breves(PA)
Maracanã(PA)
Bragança(PA)
Bragança(PA)
Amapá(AP)
Amapá(AP)
Oiapoque(AP)
Oiapoque(AP)
Oiapoque(AP)
Oiapoque(AP)
Soure(PA)
Parnaíba(PI)
Tutóia(MA)
Tutóia(MA)
Araioses(MA)
Tutóia(MA)
Barreirinhas(MA)
Barreirinhas(MA)
Barreirinhas(MA)
1,101
VH
VH
Protected Area
Barreirinhas(MA)
276
45
EH
EH
VH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Araioses(MA)
Paulino Neves(MA)
Tracuateua(PA)
Gurupá(PA)
Salinópolis(PA)
Soure(PA)
Curuçá(PA)
Laranjal do Jari(AP)
Afuá(PA)
Afuá(PA)
Soure(PA)
Macapá(AP)
260
CaZc043
CaZc139
CaZc143
CaZc145
CaZc146
CaZc147
CaZc150
CaZc151
CaZc153
CaZc164
CaZc165
CaZc170
CaZc173
CaZc178
CaZc182
CaZc186
CaZc191
CaZc194
CaZc196
CaZc198
CaZc199
CaZc203
CaZc204
CaZc206
CaZc207
CaZc208
CaZc209
CaZc210
CaZc211
CaZc212
CaZc213
CaZc214
Região de Olho d'água Grande
Açu
São Miguel (RN)
Complexo estuarino Porto do
Mangue-Macau
Complexo estuarino do AmaréGalinhos
Tabuleiros de Caiçara do Norte
Ponta do Mel/Dunas do Rosado
Estuário do Rio Mossoró
Plataforma interna do Rio Grande
do Norte
Litoral Icapui/Aracati
Estuário do Rio Jaguaribe
Estuário do Rio Pirangi
Beberibe
Litoral Beberibe-Cascavel
Plataforma Interna Costa leste do
Ceará
Estuário dos rios Pacoti/Cocó
Estuário Rio Ceará
Lagamar e Dunas do Cauípe
Enseada do Mucuripe
Pecém
Bacia do Siupé
Litoral Trairi/Paracuru
Área Recifal Paracuru/Trairi
Estuário do rio Mundaú
Dunas de Caetanos
Baixo Parnaíba (Delta)
Estuário do Aracati-Açú
Sul da APA Foz do Rio Preguiças
RVS Peixe-boi marinho
Lagoas Costeiras de Camocim (leste)
Lagoas Costeiras de Camocim Oeste
Litoral de Barroquinha
674
5,084
76
EH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Girau do Ponciano(AL)
Mossoró(RN)
Touros(RN)
481
EH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Macau(RN)
371
EH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Macau(RN)
147
137
330
H
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA - undefined category
São Miguel do Gostoso(RN)
Areia Branca(RN)
Mossoró(RN)
5,339
VH
VH
Creation full protection PA
Touros(RN)
2,390
538
376
651
428
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Aracati(CE)
Aracati(CE)
Beberibe(CE)
Cascavel(CE)
Aquiraz(CE)
3,150
H
EH
Fisheries Planning and regularization
328
44
73
649
96
50
306
263
169
192
1,714
679
66
234
516
268
390
H
VH
VH
VH
H
IK
H
VH
VH
IK
EH
VH
VH
EH
IK
IK
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
H
VH
H
EH
VH
H
EH
H
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Inventory
Creation PA - undefined category
Inventory
Creation full protection PA
Planning and regularization
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Inventory
Creation PA - undefined category
Fortaleza(CE)
Fortaleza(CE)
Fortaleza(CE)
Caucaia(CE)
Fortaleza(CE)
Caucaia(CE)
São Gonçalo do Amarante(CE)
Trairi(CE)
Paracuru(CE)
Itapipoca(CE)
Itapipoca(CE)
Parnaíba(PI)
Amontada(CE)
Parnaíba(PI)
Luís Correia(PI)
Camocim(CE)
Camocim(CE)
Camocim(CE)
261
CaZc215
CaZc216
CaZc217
CaZc218
CaZc219
CaZc220
CaZc272
CaZc274
CaZc275
CaZc276
CaZc277
CaZc281
CaZc283
CaZc284
CaZc285
CaZc288
CaZc290
CaZc291
CaZc292
CaZc293
CaZc294
CaZc295
MaZc002
MaZc008
MaZc017
MaZc022
MaZc025
MaZc029
MaZc032
MaZc037
MaZc038
MaZc040
Estuário do Coreaú
Lagoas costeiras de Acaraú e Jijoca
Plataforma Interna Costa Oeste do
Ceará
Complexo estuarino de Itarema
Estuário do Rio Timonha
Estuário do Rio Acaraú
APA da Lagoa de Uruaú
TI Genipapo Canindé (não
reconhecida)
RESEX do Batoque
APA do Rio Pacoti
PE do Rio Cocó
APA do Estuário do Rio Ceará
PE Marinho da Pedra da Risca do
Meio
ESEC do Pecém
APA do Pecém
APA das Dunas da Lagoinha
APA do Estuário Rio Mundaú
Timonha
TI Córrego João Pereira
APA Delta do Parnaíba
APA da Lagoa de Jijoca
PN de Jericoacoara
Foz do R. Três Forquilhas
Complexo Lagoa do Forno e Jacaré
Lagoas costeiras do extremo sul
de SC
Ponto do Peixe
Ecótono do cabo de Sta Marta
Mirim
Passarim
Maciço Cristalino Sull da Ilha de SC
PAREST Serra do Tabuleiro Corridor
Costa Leste da Ilha de Sta Catarina
359
208
VH
IK
VH
H
H
H
947
447
458
28
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
VH
H
18
H
74
30
11
25
8,773
Inventory
Camocim(CE)
Acaraú(CE)
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Acaraú(CE)
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Protected Area
Acaraú(CE)
Barroquinha(CE)
Acaraú(CE)
Beberibe(CE)
H
Protected Area
Aquiraz(CE)
H
VH
H
VH
H
EH
H
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Aquiraz(CE)
Fortaleza(CE)
Fortaleza(CE)
Fortaleza(CE)
39
EH
VH
Protected Area
10
1
5
16
1,039
33
264
40
86
31
152
IK
IK
IK
VH
VH
H
EH
H
H
H
EH
H
H
H
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Caucaia(CE)
São Gonçalo do Amarante(CE)
Trairi(CE)
Itapipoca(CE)
Granja(CE)
Acaraú(CE)
Luís Correia(PI)
Cruz(CE)
Cruz(CE)
Três Cachoeiras(RS)
Torres(RS)
664
EH
VH
Creation PA - undefined category
Criciúma(SC)
5
2,167
24
267
61
15
136
IK
EH
VH
H
EH
H
VH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
H
VH
Inventory
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Recuperation
Environmental Education
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Içara(SC)
Tubarão(SC)
Imbituba(SC)
Palhoça(SC)
Palhoça(SC)
262
MaZc041
MaZc043
MaZc051
MaZc052
MaZc057
MaZc060
MaZc062
MaZc070
MaZc071
MaZc075
MaZc088
MaZc093
MaZc097
MaZc098
MaZc101
MaZc104
MaZc108
MaZc110
MaZc112
MaZc113
MaZc115
MaZc122
MaZc123
MaZc126
MaZc129
MaZc133
MaZc138
MaZc145
MaZc154
MaZc155
MaZc156
MaZc157
Maciço Cristalino Norte da Ilha de SC
Entorno de Carijós
Ganchos
Planície de Maré Baía Tijucas
Costeira de Zimbros
Vale do Rio Camburiú
Costa Brava
Morraria do Atalaia e Canto do
Morcego
Praia de Navegantes
Morrarias de Penha
Arquipélago dos Remédios
Arquipélago de Tamboretes
Baia de Babitonga e Itapoá
Baía da Babitonga e Ilhas
Arquipélago da Paz
Barra do Saí-Guaçu
Baía de Guaratuba
Arquipélago Currais e Ilhas Itacolomi
Lagoa do Parado
Plataforma interna do Paraná
Pontal do Paraná
Baía de Paranaguá
Baía de Antonina
Morretes
Ilhas da Figueira e Castilho
Barra de Cananéia
Ilha Comprida
Costeira - Isóbata de 20 a 30m de
profundidade
Costeira - Isóbata de 5 a 20m de
profundidade
Ilhas e ilhotas Litoral Sul-SP
Costeira - Isóbata de 0 a 5m de
profundidade
Itanhaém
76
25
66
12
68
677
47
EH
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
Environmental Education
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Governador Celso Ramos(SC)
Tijucas(SC)
Porto Belo(SC)
Itajaí(SC)
Balneário Camboriú(SC)
4
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Itajaí(SC)
3
44
13
8
1,059
112
13
145
222
66
117
1,826
335
98
334
137
104
44
132
VH
H
VH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
Recuperation
Inventory
Creation full protection PA
Navegantes(SC)
Navegantes(SC)
2,225
VH
EH
Recuperation
5,274
VH
VH
Recuperation
H
H
1,277
EH
EH
Other
Santos(SP)
445
VH
VH
Creation PA - undefined category
Praia Grande(SP)
14
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Joinville(SC)
Joinville(SC)
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Guaratuba(PR)
Guaratuba(PR)
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Inventory
Creation full protection PA
Inventory
Inventory
Recuperation
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Recuperation
Guaratuba(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Antonina(PR)
Cananéia(SP)
Iguape(SP)
Ilhabela(SP)
Creation full protection PA
263
MaZc158
MaZc162
MaZc163
MaZc164
MaZc167
MaZc169
MaZc170
MaZc171
MaZc173
MaZc177
MaZc180
MaZc185
MaZc193
MaZc200
MaZc205
MaZc206
MaZc209
MaZc210
MaZc211
MaZc212
MaZc213
MaZc214
MaZc215
MaZc216
MaZc218
MaZc219
MaZc220
MaZc221
MaZc223
MaZc225
MaZc227
MaZc229
Alcatrazes
Região entre Baía de Santos e
Guarujá
Guaiúba - Guarujá e Saco do
Major - Ilha da Moela
Restingas da Praia Grande
Estuário de São Vicente
Ilhas e ilhotes de Ilhabela
Canal de Bertioga
Quilombos do Médio Ribeira
Ilhas e ilhotes de São Sebastião
Itaguaré - Bertioga
Restingas de Bertioga
Praias e costões do litoral norte de
Ubatuba
Ilhas e ilhotes de Ubatuba
Iha Grande e Jorge Grego
Baia da Ilha Grande - RJ
Ilhas costeiras da região
metropolitana do RJ
Bocaina
Arraial do Cabo
Baia de Sepetiba
Lagoa de Itaipu-morro das andorinhas
Lagoas costeira do estado do Rio
Lagoa de Araruama
Tampão da Fl da Tijuca
Itaocaia
Lagoas de Saquarema
Maricá
Bacaxá
Engenho pequeno
Cabo de buzios e ilhas adjacentes
Baia da Guanabara
Mico Leão Corridor
Baixada do N Fluminense
23
EH
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
26
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Guarujá(SP)
20
H
EH
Recuperation
Guarujá(SP)
48
92
2
162
119
4
48
85
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
Recuperation
Recuperation
São Vicente(SP)
Santos(SP)
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Bertioga(SP)
Bertioga(SP)
283
VH
EH
Recuperation
Caraguatatuba(SP)
7
154
1,214
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Fostering sustainable use
104
VH
VH
Creation PA - undefined category
162
84
1,004
8
39
226
43
8
75
309
55
11
145
296
840
2,217
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
H
VH
H
EH
H
VH
IK
EH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
H
EH
H
VH
H
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering sustainable use
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Santos(SP)
Santos(SP)
Creation PA - undefined category
Angra dos Reis(RJ)
Angra dos Reis(RJ)
Cabo Frio(RJ)
Rio de Janeiro(RJ)
Niterói(RJ)
Maricá(RJ)
Cabo Frio(RJ)
Rio de Janeiro(RJ)
Maricá(RJ)
Saquarema(RJ)
São Gonçalo(RJ)
Saquarema(RJ)
São Gonçalo(RJ)
Cabo Frio(RJ)
Rio de Janeiro(RJ)
Cabo Frio(RJ)
Macaé(RJ)
264
MaZc233
MaZc246
MaZc247
MaZc248
MaZc256
MaZc264
MaZc275
MaZc282
MaZc290
MaZc307
MaZc313
MaZc322
MaZc326
MaZc328
MaZc330
MaZc332
MaZc338
MaZc342
MaZc343
MaZc345
MaZc351
MaZc358
MaZc363
MaZc368
MaZc373
MaZc375
MaZc376
MaZc385
MaZc386
Mauá
Rio das Ostras
Arquipelago de Santana
Faixa de marinha de Jurubatiba
Carapebus
Lagoa Feia
Farol de São Tomé
Tartaruga marinha
Foz do rio Paraíba
Praia das Neves
Área marinha das ilhas de
Marataízes - ES
Ilhas Piúma/Francês
Anchieta
Área marinha das ilhas de
Guarapari - ES
Área Costeira entre Vila Velha e
Itapemirim
Area Costeira entre Vila Velha e
Marataizes
Área marinha das ilhas de Vila Velha
Mangue do Lameirão
Área Costeira entre Serra e Vitória
Queimados
REVIS Santa Cruz/ APA Costa
das Algas (prop.)
Piraquê-Açu
Área marinha contígua a Foz do
Rio Doce
Foz do Rio Doce – Sustainable
Use PA proposal
Planície Costeira do Rio Doce
Floresta da Vale do Rio Doce
Área Cost. de Monsaraes à ponta
dos lençóis
Conceição da Barra Mosaic
Rio Mucuri
104
253
20
1,320
58
811
399
4,115
218
67
H
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
H
H
VH
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering sustainable use
Inventory
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Fostering sustainable use
Duque de Caxias(RJ)
Macaé(RJ)
640
EH
VH
Fostering sustainable use
Marataízes(ES)
577
112
EH
H
EH
H
Creation PA - undefined category
Environmental Education
Guarapari(ES)
Guarapari(ES)
544
EH
VH
Fostering sustainable use
Vila Velha(ES)
756
H
H
1,791
H
H
237
28
526
49
EH
VH
H
H
VH
EH
H
H
1,497
EH
74
Macaé(RJ)
Quissamã(RJ)
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
Campos dos Goytacazes(RJ)
São Francisco de Itabapoana(RJ)
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Vila Velha(ES)
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Recuperation
Vila Velha(ES)
Cariacica(ES)
Vila Velha(ES)
Serra(ES)
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Serra(ES)
EH
EH
Fostering sustainable use
Aracruz(ES)
906
EH
H
480
EH
EH
Creation sustainable use PA
Linhares(ES)
2,102
435
EH
EH
EH
H
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Linhares(ES)
Linhares(ES)
3,511
EH
VH
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Linhares(ES)
742
633
EH
H
VH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mucuri(BA)
Nova Viçosa(BA)
Inventory
265
MaZc388
MaZc390
MaZc392
MaZc394
MaZc395
MaZc396
MaZc398
MaZc399
MaZc401
MaZc405
MaZc406
MaZc407
MaZc414
MaZc416
MaZc421
MaZc425
MaZc427
MaZc429
MaZc432
MaZc438
MaZc439
MaZc444
MaZc446
MaZc447
MaZc448
MaZc450
MaZc451
MaZc452
MaZc454
MaZc456
MaZc457
MaZc458
REBIO Mucuri Proposal
Rio Peruípe
Cassurubá
Rio Itanhentinga
Vale do Jucuruçu
Contorno sul do PARNA
Descobrimento
Mussununga
Expansion of PARNA do
Descobrimento
Guaratinga
REBIO Rio dos Frades Proposal
Monte Pascoal - Pau Brasil Corridor
Expansion of PARNA Pau Brasil
São Miguel (BA)
Belmonte
Jequitinhonha
Florestas pluviais do Pardo
Campos Úmidos de Santa Luzia
Una S. Baixão Protected Areas
Corridor
Bacia Cachoeira-Santana
Serra das Onças/Machado
Lagoa Santa
Água Branca
Jaguaripe e Salinas das Margaridas
Matas da Paralela e Pituaçu
Manguezais do Recôncavo Baiano
Dunas de Abrantes
Entorno de Camaçari
Serra de S. Francisco e Reman.
do Bx. Paraguassu
Praia do Forte e Imbassaí
Fragmentos do Litoral Norte
Massarandupió
Complexo de zonas úmidas e
31
1,406
634
1,240
511
IK
H
VH
H
H
H
H
EH
H
VH
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA - undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Nova Viçosa(BA)
Teixeira de Freitas(BA)
Nova Viçosa(BA)
Teixeira de Freitas(BA)
Itamaraju(BA)
128
H
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Prado(BA)
60
IK
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Prado(BA)
150
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Prado(BA)
1,181
14
702
135
278
1,168
1,187
1,420
1,065
H
H
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Fostering sustainable use
Recuperation
Porto Seguro(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Santa Cruz Cabrália(BA)
Canavieiras(BA)
Canavieiras(BA)
Canavieiras(BA)
3,450
EH
EH
Fostering sustainable use
Ilhéus(BA)
3,221
567
317
238
233
44
416
14
264
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
H
IK
IK
IK
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
H
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Ilhéus(BA)
Camamu(BA)
Gandu(BA)
Valença(BA)
Maragogipe(BA)
Salvador(BA)
Maragogipe(BA)
Camaçari(BA)
Camaçari(BA)
544
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Santo Amaro(BA)
152
2,389
176
212
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Camaçari(BA)
Camaçari(BA)
Entre Rios(BA)
Conde(BA)
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
266
MaZc459
MaZc461
MaZc463
MaZc465
MaZc467
MaZc468
MaZc469
MaZc470
MaZc471
MaZc473
MaZc474
MaZc476
MaZc477
MaZc478
MaZc479
MaZc483
MaZc487
MaZc489
MaZc490
MaZc494
MaZc495
MaZc497
MaZc498
MaZc499
MaZc500
MaZc501
MaZc503
MaZc504
MaZc506
MaZc509
MaZc510
MaZc512
MaZc514
MaZc515
restingas do Itapicuru
Litoral e complexo das matas do
sul de Sergipe
Foz do Vaza Barris
Estuário do Sergipe
Foz do São Francisco (Litoral)
Região de Japaratuba
Banco do Peba
Foz do São Francisco
Pontal do Coruripe
Baixios de Dom Rodrigues
Lagoa de Jequiá
Pratagi
São Miguel dos Campos
Messias - Flexeiras
Talude da APA Costa dos Corais
Barra de Camaragibe
Porto Calvo
Barreiros - Maragogi
Guadalupe
Ipojuca
Cabo
Recifes
Pina- Parque dos manguezais
Capibaribe e Tegipió
Camaragibe - Tapacurá
Itamaracá - Coetés
Santa Teresa - Goiana
Goiânia
Pitimbu
Tambaba
Buraquinho
Rio Paraíba
Mamanguape - Rio Tinto
Potíguara
Barra de Camaratuba
1,470
EH
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Aracaju(SE)
514
1,060
2,647
1,279
277
318
33
343
404
1,355
808
686
1,500
383
89
643
633
180
418
553
7
26
1,019
815
43
248
258
273
7
1,445
162
372
82
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
IK
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
H
H
EH
EH
H
VH
VH
H
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
H
IK
IK
VH
VH
EH
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
VH
VH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
H
VH
VH
VH
VH
VH
H
EH
H
VH
H
Creation sustainable use PA
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
Aracaju(SE)
Aracaju(SE)
Penedo(AL)
Capela(SE)
Coruripe(AL)
Penedo(AL)
Coruripe(AL)
Coruripe(AL)
Coruripe(AL)
Maceió(AL)
Maceió(AL)
Maceió(AL)
Creation PA - undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Recuperation
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation full protection PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation sustainable use PA
Recuperation
Recuperation
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation full protection PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
Planning and regularization
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Inventory
São Luís do Quitunde(AL)
Porto Calvo(AL)
Palmares(PE)
Ipojuca(PE)
Ipojuca(PE)
Jaboatão dos Guararapes(PE)
Recife(PE)
Recife(PE)
Recife(PE)
Recife(PE)
Olinda(PE)
Goiana(PE)
Goiana(PE)
Caaporã(PB)
Conde(PB)
João Pessoa(PB)
João Pessoa(PB)
Mamanguape(PB)
Mamanguape(PB)
Mamanguape(PB)
267
MaZc516
MaZc517
MaZc518
MaZc520
MaZc521
MaZc522
MaZc523
MaZc524
MaZc525
MaZc526
MaZc533
MaZc550
MaZc551
MaZc555
MaZc558
MaZc559
MaZc560
MaZc566
MaZc588
MaZc592
MaZc594
MaZc595
MaZc597
MaZc599
MaZc600
MaZc601
MaZc603
MaZc607
MaZc608
MaZc618
MaZc625
MaZc630
MaZc636
MaZc637
MaZc639
Baia formosa Mataraca
Baía Formosa Marinho
Mata da Estrela
Bom Jardim
Pipa-Nísia Floresta
Pirangi-Búzios
Barreira do inferno
Cotovelo Corridor
Mangue e dunas do Potengi
Dunas do Norte
PE da Guarita
APA da Baleia Franca
PE da Serra do Tabuleiro
RESEX Pirajubaé
ESEC de Carijós
APA Anhatomirim e Baía Norte
TI Mbiguaçu
REBIO Marinha do Arvoredo
PE do Acarai
PE do Boguaçu
PE do Rio da Onça
APA de Guaratuba
PN de Saint-Hilaire/Lange
ESEC do Guaraguaçu
Parque da restinga de pontal
FLOES do Palmito
PE da Ilha do Mel
TI Ilha da Cotinga
ESEC da Ilha do Mel
PN do Superagui
APA Guaraqueçaba
PE Ilha do Cardoso
APA de Cananéia-Iguapé e Peruíbe
PE Jacupiranga
ESEC Chaúas
175
384
39
23
876
364
78
209
252
1,468
0
544
930
17
8
124
0
174
62
60
1
1,341
253
12
7
5
4
17
30
340
2,427
131
1,265
1,491
27
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
H
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
VH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
H
H
EH
EH
EH
H
H
H
H
EH
H
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
H
H
VH
VH
VH
H
EH
H
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Recuperation
Creation PA - undefined category
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Baía Formosa(RN)
Baía Formosa(RN)
Baía Formosa(RN)
Canguaretama(RN)
São José de Mipibu(RN)
Parnamirim(RN)
Natal(RN)
Natal(RN)
Natal(RN)
Natal(RN)
Torres(RS)
Palhoça(SC)
Palhoça(SC)
Governador Celso Ramos(SC)
Biguaçu(SC)
São Francisco do Sul(SC)
Guaratuba(PR)
Matinhos(PR)
São José dos Pinhais(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Paranaguá(PR)
Cananéia(SP)
Paranaguá(PR)
Cananéia(SP)
Iguape(SP)
Campina Grande do Sul(PR)
Iguape(SP)
268
MaZc650
MaZc657
MaZc661
MaZc663
MaZc666
MaZc673
MaZc674
MaZc677
MaZc690
MaZc696
MaZc698
MaZc703
MaZc705
MaZc706
MaZc707
MaZc708
MaZc709
MaZc710
MaZc711
MaZc712
MaZc713
MaZc714
MaZc715
MaZc716
MaZc717
MaZc719
MaZc720
MaZc721
MaZc724
MaZc727
MaZc728
MaZc731
MaZc736
MaZc745
MaZc758
TI Piaçaguera
TI Itaóca
TI Guarani do Aguapeu
PE Xixová-Japuí
PE Ilha Bela
PE Serra do Mar-N. São Sebastião
TI Guarani do Ribeirão Silveira
PE Serra do Mar-N. Caraguatatuba
PE Serra do Mar-N. Picinguaba
TI Guarani Araponga
APA de Cairuçu
PE Marinho do Aventureiro
PE da Ilha Grande
REBIO Estadual da Praia do Sul
RESEX Marinha do Arraial do Cabo
APA de Tamoios
REBIO e Arqueológica de Guaratiba
ESEC de Tamoios
APA de Maricá
APA de Massambaba
PE da Serra da Tiririca
PN da Tijuca
APA do Pau Brasil
PE da Pedra Branca
UC Darcy Ribeiro
PN da Serra da Bocaina
APA da Serra de Sapiatiba
APA de Mangaratiba
TI Guarani de Bracui
ESEC da Guanabara
APA de Guapi-Mirim
ESEC Bananal
APA da Bacia do Rio São
João/Mico-Leão-Dourado
REBIO União
PN da Restinga de Jurubatiba
6
5
44
6
295
338
86
429
509
2
322
18
44
35
526
104
37
214
10
110
23
35
107
127
49
939
61
248
22
20
122
9
H
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
H
H
H
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
VH
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
H
EH
VH
VH
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
VH
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Peruíbe(SP)
Mongaguá(SP)
Itanhaém(SP)
São Vicente(SP)
Ilhabela(SP)
Caraguatatuba(SP)
São Sebastião(SP)
Caraguatatuba(SP)
Caraguatatuba(SP)
Ubatuba(SP)
Ubatuba(SP)
1,536
EH
H
Protected Area
Nova Friburgo(RJ)
30
152
EH
EH
H
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Macaé(RJ)
Macaé(RJ)
Cabo Frio(RJ)
Rio de Janeiro(RJ)
Angra dos Reis(RJ)
Maricá(RJ)
Araruama(RJ)
São Gonçalo(RJ)
Rio de Janeiro(RJ)
Cabo Frio(RJ)
Rio de Janeiro(RJ)
São Gonçalo(RJ)
Angra dos Reis(RJ)
São Pedro da Aldeia(RJ)
Angra dos Reis(RJ)
Angra dos Reis(RJ)
São Gonçalo(RJ)
São Gonçalo(RJ)
Bananal(SP)
269
MaZc776
MaZc781
MaZc785
MaZc786
MaZc792
MaZc794
MaZc798
MaZc802
MaZc805
MaZc808
MaZc809
MaZc812
MaZc819
MaZc820
MaZc821
MaZc823
MaZc829
MaZc830
MaZc832
MaZc833
MaZc836
MaZc837
MaZc838
MaZc839
MaZc840
MaZc843
MaZc844
MaZc845
MaZc846
MaZc847
MaZc848
MaZc849
ESEC de Guaxindiba
APA de Guanandy
APA de Setiba
PE Paulo César Vinha
PE da Fonte Grande
APA de Praia Mole
APA de Mestre Álvaro
TI Caieiras Velha
TI Pau Brasil (ES)
TI Comboios
REBIO de Comboios
FLONA de Goytacazes
APA de Conceição da Barra
PE de Itaúnas
FLONA do Rio Preto
REBIO do Córrego Grande
PN e Histórico do Monte Pascoal
APA Caraíva/Trancoso
APA Coroa Vermelha
APA Santo Antônio
APA Lagoa Encantada e Rio Almada
PE Serra do Conduru
APA Costa de Itacaré/Serra Grande
APA Baía de Camamu
APA Pratigi
APA Tinharé Boipeba
APA Caminhos Ecológicos da Boa
Esperança
APA Baía de Todos os Santos (Ilha de
Itaparica e Recifes Costeiros)
APA Baía de Todos os Santos
(Costões Rochosos de Salvador)
APA Lagoas e Dunas do Abaeté
APA Bacia do Cobre S.
Bartolomeu
APA Baía de Todos os Santos
33
52
110
17
2
4
26
31
16
25
8
14
81
50
30
16
230
206
30
54
997
97
557
1,028
955
321
EH
VH
EH
EH
H
H
H
H
H
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
IK
IK
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
VH
VH
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
VH
VH
EH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Marataízes(ES)
Vila Velha(ES)
Guarapari(ES)
Vitória(ES)
Serra(ES)
Serra(ES)
Aracruz(ES)
Aracruz(ES)
Aracruz(ES)
Linhares(ES)
Linhares(ES)
São Mateus(ES)
Mucuri(BA)
Conceição da Barra(ES)
Mucuri(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Santa Cruz Cabrália(BA)
Ilhéus(BA)
Ilhéus(BA)
Ubaitaba(BA)
Camamu(BA)
Camamu(BA)
Cairu(BA)
1,147
EH
EH
Protected Area
Valença(BA)
354
EH
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Vera Cruz(BA)
34
EH
H
Planning and regularization
Salvador(BA)
13
H
H
Protected Area
Salvador(BA)
11
IK
H
Protected Area
Salvador(BA)
818
VH
VH
Creation PA - undefined category
Salvador(BA)
São Francisco de Itabapoana(RJ)
270
MaZc850
MaZc851
MaZc852
MaZc853
MaZc854
MaZc856
MaZc857
MaZc858
MaZc859
MaZc861
MaZc862
MaZc863
MaZc864
MaZc865
MaZc866
MaZc869
MaZc870
MaZc871
MaZc872
MaZc873
MaZc874
MaZc875
MaZc876
MaZc880
MaZc881
MaZc882
MaZc883
MaZc884
MaZc885
MaZc886
PpZc003
APA Rio Capivara
APA Baía de Todos os Santos
(BTS Petroquímica)
RESEX Marinha da Baia de Iguapé
APA Joanes Ipitanga
APA Lagoas de Guarajuba
APA Plataforma Continental do
Litoral Norte
APA Litoral Norte do Estado da Bahia
APA Mangue Seco
FLONA Ibura
REBIO de Santa Isabel
APA de Piaçabuçu
RESEX Marinha da Lagoa do Jequiá
RESEC Manguezais da Lagoa do
Roteiro
RESEC Saco da Pedra
APA da Costa dos Corais
REBIO de Saltinho
APA Estadual de Guadalupe
PE do Jacarapé
PE de Aratu
FLONA da Restinga do Cabedelo
PE Marinho de Areia Vermelha
APA da Barra do Rio Mamanguape
ARIE Manguesais da Foz do Rio
Mamanguape
PE das Dunas de Natal
APA Estadual dos Recifes de Corais
APA Jericoacoara
ESEC Juréia-Itatins
Expansion of PE Ilha Anchieta
ARIE Queimada Grande e
Queimada Pequena
PE Ilha Anchieta
Banhado do Mundo Novo
18
H
VH
Creation PA - undefined category
Camaçari(BA)
242
H
H
Protected Area
Salvador(BA)
85
670
20
IK
H
H
EH
H
H
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Maragogipe(BA)
Salvador(BA)
Camaçari(BA)
3,593
EH
VH
Protected Area
Camaçari(BA)
788
151
2
43
95
107
H
EH
H
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
H
H
EH
VH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Camaçari(BA)
Estância(SE)
Nossa Senhora do Socorro(SE)
Pacatuba(SE)
Piaçabuçu(AL)
Coruripe(AL)
8
EH
EH
Protected Area
Roteiro(AL)
2
4,256
6
372
4
4
1
2
96
EH
EH
EH
VH
IK
IK
H
H
EH
VH
EH
EH
EH
VH
VH
H
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Creation sustainable use PA
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
Marechal Deodoro(AL)
Maceió(AL)
Rio Formoso(PE)
Barreiros(PE)
João Pessoa(PB)
João Pessoa(PB)
João Pessoa(PB)
61
EH
EH
Protected Area
Rio Tinto(PB)
17
1,410
1
799
10
EH
EH
H
EH
EH
H
EH
H
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Creation full protection PA
Natal(RN)
Touros(RN)
Jijoca de Jericoacoara(CE)
Peruíbe(SP)
1
EH
EH
Protected Area
8
237
EH
EH
EH
VH
Protected Area
Inventory
Creation PA - undefined category
Rio Tinto(PB)
Arroio Grande(RS)
271
PpZc004
PpZc006
PpZc008
PpZc009
PpZc012
PpZc013
PpZc018
PpZc020
PpZc027
PpZc028
PpZc036
PpZc037
PpZc040
PpZc042
PpZc051
PpZc057
PpZc064
PpZc069
PpZc071
PpZc089
PpZc090
PpZc091
PpZc092
PpZc093
PpZc094
PpZc097
PpZc100
PpZc103
Banhado do Maçarico e cordões
litorâneos anexos
Várzea do Canal de S Gonçalo
Banhado de Estreito
Estuário da Laguna dos Patos
Sistema Lagoa Pequena
Sistema Bujuru
Expansion of Parque Camaquã
Lagoa dos Patos
Campos de dunas e lagoas cost.
do litoral médio
Butiazais de Tapes
Lagoa do Casamento e Ecossist.
associados
Butiazais de Palmares do Sul
Morro de Santana - PE Ecological
Corridor
Dunas móveis de Cidreira
Sistema Lagunar Tramandaí-Armazém
Áreas úmidas ao norte de Tramandaí
Região de Itapeva
Complexo Lagoa do Forno e
Jacaré(Costeiro)
Remanescente próximo a Torres
ESEC do Taim
ARIE Pontal dos Latinos e Pontal
do Santiago
REBIO da Mata Grande
PN Lagoa do Peixe
PE do Camaquã
TI da Pacheca
PE Itapuã
PE Delta do Jacuí
PE de Itapeva
875
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Rio Grande(RS)
945
174
1,028
371
246
191
8,016
EH
VH
VH
VH
H
EH
H
EH
VH
EH
H
VH
EH
H
Creation sustainable use PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Pelotas(RS)
São José do Norte(RS)
Pelotas(RS)
Pelotas(RS)
São José do Norte(RS)
Camaquã(RS)
Viamão(RS)
847
VH
H
216
EH
645
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Recuperation
Creation full protection PA
Mosaic/Corridor
Tramandaí(RS)
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Tapes(RS)
VH
VH
Creation sustainable use PA
Viamão(RS)
78
H
H
Mosaic/Corridor
Palmares do Sul(RS)
239
H
EH
Creation full protection PA
Porto Alegre(RS)
133
56
300
120
VH
VH
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Recuperation
Mosaic/Corridor
Creation PA - undefined category
Tramandaí(RS)
Osório(RS)
Osório(RS)
Torres(RS)
3
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
Torres(RS)
2
1,113
H
EH
H
H
Protected Area
Torres(RS)
Rio Grande(RS)
30
H
H
Protected Area
Santa Vitória do Palmar(RS)
47
368
56
22
60
227
10
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
VH
H
EH
VH
H
EH
EH
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Protected Area
Rio Grande(RS)
Mostardas(RS)
Camaquã(RS)
Camaquã(RS)
Viamão(RS)
Porto Alegre(RS)
Torres(RS)
272
PpZc104
PE Acarai
22
EH
H
Protected Area
Torres(RS)
Marine Zone
Table 11.9.8 – List of Priority Areas for the Marine Zone with: area code, size (km2), biological importance (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high, IK –
insufficiently known), urgency for action (H – high, VH – very high, EH – extremely high), main priority action recommended, and main municipality.
Size (km2) Importance Priority Priority Action
Main Municipality
Area code Name
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Zm001
Chuí
7,793
VH
VH
Zm002
Parcéis do Albardão
336
EH
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Fisheries Planning and
Zm003
Albardão externo
13,935
VH
VH
Regularization and No-Fishing Zone
Fisheries Planning and
Zm004
Albardão interno
13,709
VH
VH
Regularization and No-Fishing Zone
Zm005
Conceição
13,025
EH
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Zm006
Zona Costeira do Rio Grande do Sul
11,703
EH
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Rio Grande(RS)
Fisheries Planning and
Zm007
Plataforma Norte do Rio Grande do Sul
24,783
H
VH
Regularization and Stock Protection
Influência do est.
Fisheries Planning and
Zm008
9,976
EH
EH
S. Franc. do Sul(SC)
Babitonga/Paranaguá/Iguape/Cananéia
Regularization and Stock Protection
Fisheries Planning and
Zm009
Banco Almirante Saldanha
2,126
EH
EH
Regularization and No-Fishing Zone
Zm010
Trindade e Martin-Vaz
2,352
EH
EH
Mosaic/Corridor
Fisheries Planning and
Zm011
Monte Columbia
2,366
EH
EH
Regularization and No-Fishing Zone
Fisheries Planning and
Zm012
Talude continental
9,175
VH
EH
Regularization and No-Fishing Zone
Vitória-Trindade-Minerva-Alte.
106,324
IK
VH
Mosaic/Corridor
Zm013
Saldanha Corridor
Fisheries Planning and
Zm014
Cadeia Vitoria-Trindade
36,792
EH
EH
Regularization and No-Fishing Zone
Zm015
Plataforma externa capixaba sul
190
VH
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Fisheries
Planning and regularization
Zm016
Complexo Recifal de Abrolhos
4,391
EH
EH
Zm017
Talude do Banco de Abrolhos
197
H
VH
Mosaic/Corridor
Zm018
Banco dos Abrolhos
46,577
EH
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Porto Seguro(BA)
Zm019
Ilhéus
713
H
H
Creation PA - undefined category
Ilhéus(BA)
Zm020
Complexo Baia de Camamu e Tinharé1,852
EH
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Valença(BA)
273
Zm021
Zm022
Zm023
Zm024
Zm025
Zm026
Zm027
Zm028
Zm029
Zm030
Zm031
Zm032
Zm033
Boipeba
Baía de Todos os Santos (área de fora)
Ao largo de Aracaju (fundido com 6-34)
Talude da APA Costa dos Corais
Talude Continental Cabo Calcanhar a
Alagoas
Plataforma externa adjacente a APA
dos Corais.
Talude Continental do Cabo Calcanhar
Entorno do Atol das Rocas
Cadeia de Fernando de Noronha Corridor
Banco Aracati
Talude Continental Setentrional
Plataforma Externa do Ceará
Fundo Duro 8 - Banco de Algas Calcáreas
1,295
1,080
9,054
VH
VH
EH
EH
VH
EH
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
Creation PA - undefined category
35,136
VH
VH
Creation PA - undefined category
1,695
EH
VH
Definition of No-Fishing Zones
4,076
555
25,719
1,233
31,957
16,235
938
15,915
EH
VH
IK
EH
VH
EH
EH
IK
EH
H
H
EH
EH
H
EH
H
Creation PA - undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
Mosaic/Corridor
Definition of No-Fishing Zones
Creation PA - undefined category
Definition of No-Fishing Zones
Creation PA - undefined category
Mosaic/Corridor
3,002
EH
EH
Fisheries Planning and regularization
670
EH
EH
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
22,858
EH
EH
Creation full protection PA
81,844
EH
VH
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
Fisheries Planning and
Regularization and Stock Protection
Fisheries Planning and
Regularization and Stock Protection
Fisheries Planning and
Regularization and Stock Protection
Creation sustainable use PA
Fisheries Planning and
Regularization and Stock Protection
Creation sustainable use PA
Fisheries Planning and
Regularization and No-Fishing Zone
Zm036
Cadeia Norte Corridor
Faixa costeira das reentrâncias
maranhenses e paraenses
Fundo Duro 7 - Carbonático - Areia ou
cascalho de molusco
Lixeira
Zm037
Plataforma do Amapá + Golfão Marajoara
Zm038
Fundos Duros 2
1,161
EH
EH
Zm039
Talude do Chuí
4,013
H
VH
Zm040
Cone de Rio Grande
6,166
EH
EH
Zm041
ZEE externa
H
VH
Zm042
Barra do Rio Grande
808
EH
EH
Zm043
Talude de Conceição
4,714
H
VH
Zm044
Ressurgência Cabo de Santa Marta
6,490
EH
VH
Zm045
Terraço de Rio Grande
91,346
EH
EH
Zm034
Zm035
182,273
Salvador(BA)
Fernando de Noronha(PE)
Bragança(PA)
Macapá(AP)
Rio Grande(RS)
Içara(SC)
274
Zm046
Zm047
Zm048
Zm049
Zm050
Zm051
Zm052
Zm053
Zm054
Zm055
Zm056
Zm057
Zm058
Zm059
Zm060
Zm061
Zm062
Zm063
Zm064
Zm065
Zm066
Zm067
Zm068
Zm069
Zm070
Zm071
Zm072
Plataforma externa sul-fluminense e
paulista
Águas ultra-profundas do Rio de Janeiro
Plataforma externa norte-fluminense
Região Oceânica sob Influência do
Vórtice de Vitória
Faixa Costeira do Banco de Abrolhos
Monte Hot Spur
Buffer dos montes submarinos
Base do talude de abrolhos
Talude Banco do Abrolhos/Royal
Charlotte
Bancos Rodger e Minerva
Banco Morgan
Possível afloramento rochoso
Estuário do Rio Jequitinhonha
Planície Oceânica
Serra Grande
Base do Talude
Talude
RESEX de Itacaré Proposal
Base do Talude ao largo do
Cânions de Salvador e Itaparica
Base do talude ao largo de Salvador
Afloramentos rochosos
Talude ao largo do litoral norte
Base do talude ao largo do Cânion do
São Francisco e Rio Real
Cânion do São Francisco e Rio Real
Montes Submarinos de PernambucoParaíba
Plataforma externa Cabo Calcanhar a
Alagoas
Fisheries Planning and
Regularization and Stock Protection
Inventory
117,776
VH
EH
271,443
17,746
IK
EH
H
VH
13,637
H
H
4,163
7,477
24,165
22,237
EH
EH
IK
VH
EH
VH
H
VH
Other
Inventory
Other
Fostering sustainable use
15,612
EH
EH
Fostering sustainable use
3,571
675
680
29
191,305
227
8,093
3,798
442
8,417
3,004
11,044
27,690
2,483
EH
EH
IK
H
IK
VH
IK
H
EH
IK
EH
IK
EH
IK
VH
VH
H
EH
H
VH
H
VH
EH
H
VH
H
H
VH
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Fisheries Planning and regularization
10,558
IK
H
3,967
EH
VH
8,049
EH
H
Definition of No-Fishing Zones
7,184
EH
EH
Definition of No-Fishing Zones
Definition of No-Fishing Zones
Zm073
Plataforma externa do Rio Grande do Norte
3,123
EH
EH
Zm074
Entorno do Arquipélago de Fernando
de Noronha
1,368
VH
H
Itajaí(SC)
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Inventory
Mucuri(BA)
Other
Recuperation
Belmonte(BA)
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Ilhéus(BA)
Fostering sustainable use
Fostering sustainable use
Creation sustainable use PA
Fostering sustainable use
Uruçuca(BA)
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Inventory
Fostering sustainable use
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Fostering sustainable use
Planning and regularization
Fernando de Noronha(PE)
275
Zm075
Zm076
Zm077
Zm078
Zm079
Zm080
Zm081
Zm082
Zm083
Zm084
Zm085
Zm086
Zm087
Zm088
Zm089
Zm090
Zm091
Zm092
Zm093
Zm094
Zm095
Zm096
Zm097
Zm098
Zm100
Zm102
Zm103
Zm104
ZEE
Montes Subamarinos próximos ao Atol
das Rocas
Montes Submarinos Guará e Sirius
Faixa Costeira Litoral leste MA /PI
Golfão Maranhense
Montes Submarinos da Cadeia Norte
Fundo de Areias Marinhas
Talude continental
Fundo Duro 6 - Carbonático - Areia ou
cascalho de molusco
Lamas Fluviais 2
Fundos Duros 5
Montes da Cadeia Norte - Elevações
submarinas
Arquipélago de São Pedro e São Paulo
Montes da Cadeia Norte além da ZEE
Fundos Duros 4
Bancos de Areia Fluvial (nome anetriro
do polígono: Golfão Marajoara)
Fundos Duros 3
Cone Amazônico recortado
Cone Amazônico - além da ZEE
Fundos Duros 1
Parque Nacional Marinho dos Abrolhos
RESEX Cassurubá
APA Estadual Ponta da Baleia/Abrolhos
RESEX do Corumbau
Resex de Canavieiras
Arquipélago de Fernando de Noronha
REBIO Atol das Rocas
Manoel Luis
1,285,421
IK
H
Fostering sustainable use
713
EH
VH
Definition of No-Fishing Zones
14,073
2,223
1,390
15,677
72,494
18,871
EH
EH
VH
EH
VH
VH
VH
EH
H
EH
VH
VH
Definition of No-Fishing Zones
Creation sustainable use PA
Creation sustainable use PA
Definition of No-Fishing Zones
1,634
EH
VH
Inventory
2,454
20,421
EH
EH
VH
VH
Recuperation
22,457
VH
VH
Inventory
231
6,540
804
EH
IK
EH
H
H
VH
Inventory
Inventory
Inventory
41,471
VH
VH
Inventory
3,141
133,199
40,830
580
914
362
3,268
922
868
115
374
4,700
EH
IK
IK
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
H
H
VH
EH
EH
EH
EH
EH
H
VH
EH
Recuperation
Inventory
Other
Definition of No-Fishing Zone
Area already under protection
Area already under protection
Creation sustainable use PA
Parnaíba(PI)
Alcântara(MA)
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Inventory
Fisheries Planning and regularization
Creation/Expansion sustainable use PA
Area already under protection
Area already under protection
Area already under protection
Area already under protection
Nova Viçosa(BA)
Alcobaça(BA)
Porto Seguro(BA)
Canavieiras(BA)
Fernando de Noronha(PE)
276
11.10. List of Conservation Targets and Goals by Biome
Amazon Biome
Table 11.10.1 – List of Conservation Tagets and Goal for the Amazon Biome.
TARGET NAME
CenT_doisACARA_um
TYPE
AREA (ha)
GOAL (%)
Aquatic Habitat
111,933
30
CenT_doisARAGUAIA_cinc
Aquatic Habitat
243,075
30
CenT_doisARAGUAIA_dois
Aquatic Habitat
32,513
30
CenT_doisARAGUAIA_quat
Aquatic Habitat
464,049
30
CenT_doisARAGUAIA_tres
Aquatic Habitat
649,512
30
CenT_doisFZAM_dois
Aquatic Habitat
25,865
30
CenT_doisFZTO_um
Aquatic Habitat
168,463
30
CenT_doisGUAMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,142,396
30
CenT_doisGURUPI_dois
Aquatic Habitat
599,170
30
CenT_doisGURUPI_um
Aquatic Habitat
470,184
30
CenT_doisICA_um
Aquatic Habitat
73,000
30
CenT_doisIRIRI_um
Aquatic Habitat
2,467
20
CenT_doisITAPECURU_um
Aquatic Habitat
36,430
100
CenT_doisJAPURA_um
Aquatic Habitat
6,895,494
30
CenT_doisJARI_um
Aquatic Habitat
6,809
20
CenT_doisJATAPU_um
Aquatic Habitat
14,681
20
CenT_doisJAURU_um
Aquatic Habitat
204,446
100
CenT_doisJAVARI_um
Aquatic Habitat
251,029
20
CenT_doisJUREMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
405,264
20
CenT_doisJURUA_dois
Aquatic Habitat
394,190
20
CenT_doisJURUA_tres
Aquatic Habitat
6,477,275
20
CenT_doisJURUA_um
Aquatic Habitat
537,647
69
CenT_doisJUTAI_um
Aquatic Habitat
5,497,340
100
CenT_doisLTMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
16,486
100
CenT_doisLTPA_dois
Aquatic Habitat
159,479
20
CenT_doisLTPA_um
Aquatic Habitat
58,928
100
CenT_doisMADEIRA_cinc
Aquatic Habitat
1,002,031
100
CenT_doisMADEIRA_dois
Aquatic Habitat
995,688
30
CenT_doisMADEIRA_nove
Aquatic Habitat
112,514
20
CenT_doisMADEIRA_oito
Aquatic Habitat
600,768
30
CenT_doisMADEIRA_quat
Aquatic Habitat
268,040
20
CenT_doisMADEIRA_seis
Aquatic Habitat
1,044,514
20
CenT_doisMADEIRA_sete
Aquatic Habitat
9,906,033
20
CenT_doisMADEIRA_tres
Aquatic Habitat
838,239
20
CenT_doisMADEIRA_um
Aquatic Habitat
3,908,780
100
CenT_doisMEARIM_um
Aquatic Habitat
2,364,123
85
CenT_doisMUNIM_um
Aquatic Habitat
23,218
20
CenT_doisNEGRO_dois
Aquatic Habitat
4,277,904
30
CenT_doisNEGRO_quat
Aquatic Habitat
4,731,006
30
CenT_doisNEGRO_tres
Aquatic Habitat
1,394,355
20
CenT_doisNEGRO_um
Aquatic Habitat
15,618,198
20
CenT_doisPARAGUAI_um
Aquatic Habitat
684,271
30
CenT_doisPARU_um
Aquatic Habitat
26,376
20
CenT_doisPERICUMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
136,399
20
CenT_doisPURUS_dois
Aquatic Habitat
163,962
20
277
CenT_doisPURUS_quat
Aquatic Habitat
8,526,370
20
CenT_doisPURUS_tres
Aquatic Habitat
9,919,931
20
CenT_doisPURUS_um
Aquatic Habitat
147,518
100
CenT_doisSANTARITA_um
Aquatic Habitat
2,172
20
CenT_doisSEPOTUBA_um
Aquatic Habitat
221,262
20
CenT_doisTAPAJOS_dois
Aquatic Habitat
611,361
20
CenT_doisTAPAJOS_um
Aquatic Habitat
65,120
20
CenT_doisTELESPIRES_um
Aquatic Habitat
539,144
30
CenT_doisTOCANTINS_oito
Aquatic Habitat
83,945
100
CenT_doisTOCANTINS_sete
Aquatic Habitat
105,033
20
CenT_doisTROMBETAS_um
Aquatic Habitat
13,557
20
CenT_doisTURIACU_um
Aquatic Habitat
127,118
20
CenT_doisXINGU_dois
Aquatic Habitat
853,977
20
CenT_doisXINGU_tres
Aquatic Habitat
730,514
20
CenT_doisXINGU_um
Aquatic Habitat
8,446,445
100
CenT_umICA _um
Aquatic Habitat
929,998
30
CenT_umJAPURA_um
Aquatic Habitat
400,872
77
CenT_umJAVARI_um
Aquatic Habitat
7,019,604
20
CenT_umJURUA_dois
Aquatic Habitat
7,245,999
30
CenT_umJURUA_tres
Aquatic Habitat
427,746
20
CenT_umJURUA_um
Aquatic Habitat
2,332,501
20
CenT_umJUTAI_um
Aquatic Habitat
3,355,440
100
CenT_umMADEIRA_tres
Aquatic Habitat
642,430
20
CenT_umPURUS_dois
Aquatic Habitat
2,530,404
30
CenT_umPURUS_tres
Aquatic Habitat
7,975,581
30
CenT_umPURUS_um
Aquatic Habitat
4,306,968
20
CretACARA_um
Aquatic Habitat
447,317
20
CretARAGUAIA_cinc
Aquatic Habitat
455,302
20
CretARAGUAIA_quat
Aquatic Habitat
157,963
20
CretFZAM_dois
Aquatic Habitat
396,647
20
CretFZAM_quat
Aquatic Habitat
42,159
20
CretFZAM_tres
Aquatic Habitat
421,277
100
CretGUAMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,668,856
20
CretGURUPI_dois
Aquatic Habitat
715,562
20
CretGURUPI_um
Aquatic Habitat
881,611
20
CretITAPECURU_um
Aquatic Habitat
65,251
77
CretJARI_um
Aquatic Habitat
274,514
20
CretJATAPU_um
Aquatic Habitat
3,886,359
20
CretJAURU_um
Aquatic Habitat
34,885
100
CretJAVARI_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,422
100
CretJUREMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
617,780
30
CretJURUA_um
Aquatic Habitat
172,398
30
CretLTMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
20,692
100
CretLTPA_um
Aquatic Habitat
52,305
100
CretMADEIRA_cinc
Aquatic Habitat
604,545
30
CretMADEIRA_nove
Aquatic Habitat
5,133,162
30
CretMADEIRA_oito
Aquatic Habitat
1,695,035
30
CretMADEIRA_seis
Aquatic Habitat
226,180
20
CretMADEIRA_sete
Aquatic Habitat
119,720
20
CretMADEIRA_um
Aquatic Habitat
383,424
20
CretMEARIM_um
Aquatic Habitat
2,962,722
20
CretMUNIM_um
Aquatic Habitat
31,600
100
278
CretNEGRO_dois
Aquatic Habitat
531,27
100
CretNEGRO_quat
Aquatic Habitat
1,568,495
100
CretNEGRO_um
Aquatic Habitat
2,751
20
CretPARA_um
Aquatic Habitat
2,221,207
20
CretPARAGUAI_um
Aquatic Habitat
55,401
90
CretPARU_um
Aquatic Habitat
958,741
20
CretPERICUMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
357,664
20
CretSEPOTUBA_um
Aquatic Habitat
206,183
30
CretTAPAJOS_dois
Aquatic Habitat
4,077,454
20
CretTOCANTINS_nove
Aquatic Habitat
38,174
20
CretTOCANTINS_oito
Aquatic Habitat
679,564
20
CretTOCANTINS_sete
Aquatic Habitat
302,824
100
CretTROMBETAS_um
Aquatic Habitat
442,101
20
CretTURIACU_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,620,394
20
CretXINGU_tres
Aquatic Habitat
2,058,481
100
CretXINGU_um
Aquatic Habitat
28,123
20
PalzARAGUAIA_cinc
Aquatic Habitat
623,025
100
PalzARAGUAIA_dois
Aquatic Habitat
12,236
30
PalzARAGUAIA_quat
Aquatic Habitat
69,075
30
PalzFZAM_tres
Aquatic Habitat
221,354
30
PalzGUAMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
42,904
100
PalzGURUPI_dois
Aquatic Habitat
28,815
100
PalzGURUPI_um
Aquatic Habitat
3,283
100
PalzIRIRI_um
Aquatic Habitat
439,213
30
PalzJAMANXIM_um
Aquatic Habitat
338,906
30
PalzJARI_um
Aquatic Habitat
365,676
30
PalzJATAPU_um
Aquatic Habitat
934,008
30
100
PalzJAURU_um
Aquatic Habitat
44,117
PalzJUREMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
4,974,409
30
PalzLTPA_um
Aquatic Habitat
37,987
100
PalzMADEIRA_cinc
Aquatic Habitat
1,482,320
30
PalzMADEIRA_nove
Aquatic Habitat
788,004
30
PalzMADEIRA_oito
Aquatic Habitat
1,863,827
30
PalzMADEIRA_seis
Aquatic Habitat
1,378,388
30
PalzMADEIRA_um
Aquatic Habitat
327,274
30
PalzNEGRO_quat
Aquatic Habitat
946,742
30
PalzPARAGUAI_um
Aquatic Habitat
110,904
30
PalzPARU_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,681,711
30
PalzSEPOTUBA_um
Aquatic Habitat
244,698
30
PalzTAPAJOS_dois
Aquatic Habitat
1,106,059
30
PalzTAPAJOS_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,985,921
30
PalzTELESPIRES_um
Aquatic Habitat
4,195,096
30
PalzTOCANTINS_cinc
Aquatic Habitat
36,184
100
PalzTOCANTINS_oito
Aquatic Habitat
20,422
30
PalzTOCANTINS_sete
Aquatic Habitat
92,557
100
PalzTROMBETAS_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,048,619
30
PalzXINGU_tres
Aquatic Habitat
209,183
30
PalzXINGU_um
Aquatic Habitat
338,088
30
ProtARAGUAIA_cinc
Aquatic Habitat
1,484,668
100
ProtARAGUAIA_dois
Aquatic Habitat
8,453
20
ProtARAGUAIA_quat
Aquatic Habitat
3,341,684
20
ProtARAGUAIA_tres
Aquatic Habitat
1,051,340
20
279
ProtFZAM_quat
Aquatic Habitat
452,866
30
ProtFZAM_tres
Aquatic Habitat
306,197
30
ProtGUAMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
84,199
20
ProtGURUPI_dois
Aquatic Habitat
269,120
20
ProtGURUPI_um
Aquatic Habitat
273,453
20
ProtIRIRI_um
Aquatic Habitat
13,540,703
20
ProtITAPECURU_um
Aquatic Habitat
51,494
100
ProtJAMANXIM_um
Aquatic Habitat
5,396,636
20
ProtJAPURA_um
Aquatic Habitat
134,415
20
ProtJARI_um
Aquatic Habitat
4,921,977
30
ProtJATAPU_um
Aquatic Habitat
5,076,144
30
ProtJAURU_um
Aquatic Habitat
873,329
30
ProtJUREMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
4,375,348
20
ProtLTAP_dois
Aquatic Habitat
3,077,453
30
ProtLTAP_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,627,393
30
ProtLTPA_dois
Aquatic Habitat
39,886
20
ProtLTPA_um
Aquatic Habitat
229,995
100
ProtMADEIRA_cinc
Aquatic Habitat
4,215,412
30
ProtMADEIRA_dois
Aquatic Habitat
1,109,337
20
ProtMADEIRA_nove
Aquatic Habitat
1,065,383
20
ProtMADEIRA_oito
Aquatic Habitat
1,225,649
20
ProtMADEIRA_quat
Aquatic Habitat
2,479,588
20
ProtMADEIRA_seis
Aquatic Habitat
12,387,194
20
ProtMADEIRA_sete
Aquatic Habitat
1,565,123
20
ProtMADEIRA_tres
Aquatic Habitat
2,092,260
20
ProtMADEIRA_um
Aquatic Habitat
3,670,785
20
ProtMEARIM_um
Aquatic Habitat
628
100
ProtMUNIM_um
Aquatic Habitat
3,921
100
ProtNEGRO_dois
Aquatic Habitat
12,838,442
30
ProtNEGRO_quat
Aquatic Habitat
985,736
30
ProtNEGRO_tres
Aquatic Habitat
2,332,984
30
ProtNEGRO_um
Aquatic Habitat
9,947,414
30
ProtOIAPOQU_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,211,722
30
ProtPARA_um
Aquatic Habitat
2,286,633
20
ProtPARAGUAI_um
Aquatic Habitat
93,074
30
ProtPARU_um
Aquatic Habitat
6,444,990
30
ProtPURUS_tres
Aquatic Habitat
1,184,219
20
ProtSANTARITA_um
Aquatic Habitat
188,060
30
ProtSEPOTUBA_um
Aquatic Habitat
111,044
30
ProtTAPAJOS_dois
Aquatic Habitat
1,456,475
20
ProtTAPAJOS_um
Aquatic Habitat
3,615,653
20
ProtTELESPIRES_um
Aquatic Habitat
6,461,935
20
ProtTOCANTINS_cinc
Aquatic Habitat
10,184
100
ProtTOCANTINS_nove
Aquatic Habitat
105,854
83
ProtTOCANTINS_oito
Aquatic Habitat
5,660,569
20
ProtTOCANTINS_sete
Aquatic Habitat
60,461
20
ProtTROMBETAS_um
Aquatic Habitat
10,850,663
30
ProtTURIACU_um
Aquatic Habitat
253,933
20
ProtUACA_um
Aquatic Habitat
297,465
30
ProtXINGU_dois
Aquatic Habitat
13,820,946
20
ProtXINGU_tres
Aquatic Habitat
3,536,625
20
ProtXINGU_um
Aquatic Habitat
838,747
20
280
QuatACARA_um
Aquatic Habitat
29,763
100
QuatARAGUAIA_cinc
Aquatic Habitat
25,046
100
QuatFZAM_cinc
Aquatic Habitat
69,558
30
QuatFZAM_dois
Aquatic Habitat
5,631,220
20
QuatFZAM_quat
Aquatic Habitat
51,110
20
QuatFZAM_tres
Aquatic Habitat
204,159
98
QuatFZAM_um
Aquatic Habitat
240,605
72
QuatFZTO_um
Aquatic Habitat
4,984
100
QuatGUAMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
54,488
100
QuatGURUPI_dois
Aquatic Habitat
745
100
QuatGURUPI_um
Aquatic Habitat
112
100
QuatICA_um
Aquatic Habitat
823,267
20
QuatIRIRI_um
Aquatic Habitat
36,602
100
QuatITAPECURU_um
Aquatic Habitat
19,960
100
QuatJAMANXIM_um
Aquatic Habitat
13,725
100
QuatJAPURA_um
Aquatic Habitat
2,804,909
20
QuatJARI_um
Aquatic Habitat
99,183
20
QuatJATAPU_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,041,676
20
QuatJAURU_um
Aquatic Habitat
25,093
100
QuatJAVARI_um
Aquatic Habitat
933,298
20
QuatJUREMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
317,152
30
QuatJURUA_dois
Aquatic Habitat
1,065,519
20
QuatJURUA_tres
Aquatic Habitat
1,880,449
20
QuatJURUA_um
Aquatic Habitat
625,148
20
QuatJUTAI_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,484,750
20
QuatLTAP_dois
Aquatic Habitat
389,273
30
QuatLTAP_um
Aquatic Habitat
535,945
30
QuatLTMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,621
100
QuatLTPA_dois
Aquatic Habitat
1,026
100
QuatLTPA_um
Aquatic Habitat
2
100
QuatMADEIRA_cinc
Aquatic Habitat
201,530
30
QuatMADEIRA_dois
Aquatic Habitat
187,072
30
QuatMADEIRA_nove
Aquatic Habitat
819,317
20
QuatMADEIRA_oito
Aquatic Habitat
218,135
100
QuatMADEIRA_quat
Aquatic Habitat
29,971
20
QuatMADEIRA_seis
Aquatic Habitat
162,418
20
QuatMADEIRA_sete
Aquatic Habitat
1,336,072
20
QuatMADEIRA_tres
Aquatic Habitat
330,546
20
QuatMADEIRA_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,025,620
20
QuatMEARIM_um
Aquatic Habitat
34,824
100
QuatMUNIM_um
Aquatic Habitat
14,968
100
QuatNEGRO_dois
Aquatic Habitat
545,881
20
QuatNEGRO_quat
Aquatic Habitat
965,983
20
QuatNEGRO_tres
Aquatic Habitat
146,331
20
QuatNEGRO_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,825,988
20
QuatOIAPOQU_um
Aquatic Habitat
17,219
100
QuatPARA_um
Aquatic Habitat
223,973
20
QuatPARAGUAI_um
Aquatic Habitat
138
100
QuatPARU_um
Aquatic Habitat
359,275
20
QuatPERICUMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
88,476
20
QuatPURUS_dois
Aquatic Habitat
255,001
20
QuatPURUS_quat
Aquatic Habitat
2,159,218
20
281
QuatPURUS_tres
Aquatic Habitat
1,887,780
20
QuatPURUS_um
Aquatic Habitat
526,911
20
QuatSANTARITA_um
Aquatic Habitat
439
100
QuatSEPOTUBA_um
Aquatic Habitat
732
100
QuatTAPAJOS_dois
Aquatic Habitat
395,279
20
QuatTAPAJOS_um
Aquatic Habitat
188,932
20
QuatTELESPIRES_um
Aquatic Habitat
255,672
30
QuatTOCANTINS_nove
Aquatic Habitat
103,421
100
QuatTOCANTINS_oito
Aquatic Habitat
48,661
100
QuatTOCANTINS_sete
Aquatic Habitat
49,476
20
QuatTROMBETAS_um
Aquatic Habitat
62,594
80
QuatTURIACU_um
Aquatic Habitat
1
100
QuatUACA_um
Aquatic Habitat
308,497
30
QuatXINGU_dois
Aquatic Habitat
104,777
30
QuatXINGU_tres
Aquatic Habitat
523,725
30
QuatXINGU_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,975,756
20
TercLitACARA_um
Aquatic Habitat
2,704,014
20
TercLitFZAM_cinc
Aquatic Habitat
271,617
30
TercLitFZAM_quat
Aquatic Habitat
295,451
100
TercLitFZAM_tres
Aquatic Habitat
2,904
30
TercLitFZAM_um
Aquatic Habitat
118,483
30
TercLitFZTO_um
Aquatic Habitat
118,440
20
TercLitGUAMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,938,519
20
TercLitGURUPI_dois
Aquatic Habitat
308,350
100
TercLitGURUPI_um
Aquatic Habitat
37,425
20
TercLitITAPECURU_um
Aquatic Habitat
22,035
100
TercLitJAMANXIM_um
Aquatic Habitat
5,327
100
TercLitJARI_um
Aquatic Habitat
45,860
100
TercLitLTAP_dois
Aquatic Habitat
240,829
30
TercLitLTAP_um
Aquatic Habitat
304,221
30
TercLitLTMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
5,525
100
TercLitLTPA_dois
Aquatic Habitat
950,273
20
TercLitLTPA_um
Aquatic Habitat
245,854
20
TercLitMADEIRA_nove
Aquatic Habitat
23,626
100
TercLitMUNIM_um
Aquatic Habitat
16,625
100
TercLitNEGRO_um
Aquatic Habitat
15,849
100
TercLitOIAPOQU_um
Aquatic Habitat
7,086
100
TercLitPARA_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,287,368
20
TercLitPARU_um
Aquatic Habitat
14,318
100
TercLitPERICUMA_um
Aquatic Habitat
290,570
20
TercLitTAPAJOS_um
Aquatic Habitat
1,192
100
TercLitTOCANTINS_no
Aquatic Habitat
204,268
100
TercLitTOCANTINS_oi
Aquatic Habitat
44,332
20
TercLitTURIACU_um
Aquatic Habitat
156,347
20
TercLitUACA_um
Aquatic Habitat
17,224
100
Aquatic Habitat
7,380
100
Terrestrial Habitat
98,970
60
TercLitXINGU_tres
A Cenozoico TercUM Japurá-Pu
A Cenozoico TercUM Javari-Ju
Terrestrial Habitat
31,151
60
A Cenozoico TercUM Purus-Mad
Terrestrial Habitat
463,078
60
A Proterozoico Araguaia-Tocan
Terrestrial Habitat
611,303
60
A Proterozoico Madeira-Tapajo
Terrestrial Habitat
4,532,903
60
A Proterozoico Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
40,677
60
282
A Proterozoico Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
1,434,298
60
A Proterozoico Tocantins-Mear
Terrestrial Habitat
50,641
60
A Proterozoico Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
2,544,778
60
A Cenozoico Terc_dois Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
76,811
60
A Cenozoico Terc_dois Japurá-P
Terrestrial Habitat
10,942
60
A Cenozoico Terc_dois Javari-J
Terrestrial Habitat
7,429
60
A Cenozoico Terc_dois Madeira-
Terrestrial Habitat
361,001
60
A Cenozoico Terc_dois Purus-Ma
Terrestrial Habitat
55,947
60
A Cenozoico Terc_dois Tapajos-
Terrestrial Habitat
12,291
60
A Cenozoico Terc_dois Tocantin
Terrestrial Habitat
175,909
60
A Cenozoico Terc_dois Xingu-Ar
Terrestrial Habitat
252,525
61
A Cretaceo Araguaia-Tocant
Terrestrial Habitat
304,908
60
A Cretaceo Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
6,313
60
A Cretaceo Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
8,204
60
A Cretaceo Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
2,391,017
60
A Cretaceo Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
9,265
60
A Cretaceo Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
41,419
60
A Paleozoico Araguaia-Tocant
Terrestrial Habitat
516,001
60
A Paleozoico Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
168,276
60
A Paleozoico Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
57,520
60
A Paleozoico Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
58,979
60
A Paleozoico Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
52,749
60
A Quaternario Japurá-Purus
Terrestrial Habitat
68,905
60
A Quaternario Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
22,459
60
A Quaternario Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
79,485
60
A Quaternario Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
106,958
60
A Quaternario Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
36,976
60
A Quaternario Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
43,775
60
A Terciario Litora Jari-Foz Am
Terrestrial Habitat
18,039
60
A Terciario Litora Tocantins-M
Terrestrial Habitat
382,893
60
Aa Cenozoico TercUM Japurá-P
Terrestrial Habitat
251,227
60
Aa Cenozoico TercUM Javari-J
Terrestrial Habitat
213,410
60
Aa Cenozoico TercUM Purus-Ma
Terrestrial Habitat
227,523
60
Aa Cenozoico TercUM Solimões
Terrestrial Habitat
16,624
60
Aa Proterozoico Jari-Foz Amaz
Terrestrial Habitat
9,022
60
Aa Proterozoico Madeira-Tapaj
Terrestrial Habitat
47,572
60
Aa Cenozoico Terc_dois Japurá-
Terrestrial Habitat
218,753
60
Aa Cenozoico Terc_dois Japurá-
Terrestrial Habitat
587,469
60
Aa Cenozoico Terc_dois Javari-
Terrestrial Habitat
242,793
60
Aa Cenozoico Terc_dois Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
207,056
60
Aa Cenozoico Terc_dois Purus-M
Terrestrial Habitat
365,682
60
Aa Cenozoico Terc_dois Solimõe
Terrestrial Habitat
176,856
60
Aa Cretaceo Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
5,140
60
Aa Quaternario Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
329,976
60
Aa Quaternario Japurá-Purus
Terrestrial Habitat
2,054,135
60
Aa Quaternario Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
30,262
60
Aa Quaternario Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
2,102,038
60
Aa Quaternario Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
277,688
60
Aa Quaternario Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
961,687
60
Aa Quaternario Solimões-Japurá
Terrestrial Habitat
183,431
60
Ab Cenozoico TercUM Japurá-P
Terrestrial Habitat
9,673,594
60
Ab Cenozoico TercUM Javari-J
Terrestrial Habitat
10,127,137
60
283
Ab Cenozoico TercUM Purus-Ma
Terrestrial Habitat
5,129,880
60
Ab Proterozoico Madeira-Tapaj
Terrestrial Habitat
755,643
60
Ab Proterozoico Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
266,631
60
Ab Proterozoico Trombetas-Jar
Terrestrial Habitat
34,231
60
Ab Cenozoico Terc_dois Branco-
Terrestrial Habitat
25,420
60
Ab Cenozoico Terc_dois Japurá-
Terrestrial Habitat
174,245
60
Ab Cenozoico Terc_dois Japurá-
Terrestrial Habitat
1,043,410
60
Ab Cenozoico Terc_dois Javari-
Terrestrial Habitat
562,733
60
Ab Cenozoico Terc_dois Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
2,637,925
60
Ab Cenozoico Terc_dois Purus-M
Terrestrial Habitat
5,040,366
60
Ab Cretaceo Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
33,449
60
Ab Cretaceo Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
35,609
60
Ab Cretaceo Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
58,121
60
Ab Cretaceo Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
15,032
60
Ab Paleozoico Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
129,584
60
Ab Paleozoico Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
29,272
60
Ab Quaternario Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
19,717
60
Ab Quaternario Japurá-Purus
Terrestrial Habitat
361,205
60
Ab Quaternario Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
544,581
60
Ab Quaternario Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
275,375
60
Ab Quaternario Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
321,519
60
Ab Terciario Litora Tocantins-
Terrestrial Habitat
6,634
100
Agua Araguaia-Tocant
Terrestrial Habitat
46,043
60
Agua Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
1,432,975
40
Agua Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
1,596,818
40
Agua Japurá-Purus
Terrestrial Habitat
617,533
100
Agua Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
128,302
40
Agua Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
288,812
60
Agua Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
2,648,448
40
Agua Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
513,317
60
Agua Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
1,185,110
100
Agua Solimões-Japurá
Terrestrial Habitat
1,682,908
100
Agua Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
677,123
60
Agua Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
643,181
60
Agua Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
498,640
100
Agua Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
418,264
60
AnPrsi Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
437,655
60
AnPrsi Japurá-Purus
Terrestrial Habitat
11,961
60
AnPrsi Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
56,467
100
AnPrsi Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
711,365
100
AnPrsi Paraguay
Terrestrial Habitat
501,392
40
AnPrsi Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
382,219
100
AnPrsi Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
389,810
100
AnPrsi Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
565,606
40
AnPrsi Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
508,664
60
As Cenozoico TercUM Purus-Ma
Terrestrial Habitat
9,890
60
As Proterozoico Araguaia-Toca
Terrestrial Habitat
31,426
60
As Proterozoico Branco-Trombe
Terrestrial Habitat
517,953
60
As Proterozoico Madeira-Tapaj
Terrestrial Habitat
14,587,035
60
As Proterozoico Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
1,725,576
100
As Proterozoico Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
1,057,909
60
As Proterozoico Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
17,671,220
60
284
As Proterozoico Trombetas-Jar
Terrestrial Habitat
64,365
100
As Proterozoico Xingu-Araguai
Terrestrial Habitat
7,287,139
100
As Cenozoico Terc_dois Araguai
Terrestrial Habitat
8,412
100
As Cenozoico Terc_dois Branco-
Terrestrial Habitat
18,326
60
As Cenozoico Terc_dois Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
1,137,897
60
As Cenozoico Terc_dois Negro-B
Terrestrial Habitat
48,625
60
As Cenozoico Terc_dois Purus-M
Terrestrial Habitat
156,639
60
As Cenozoico Terc_dois Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
132,486
100
As Cenozoico Terc_dois Tocanti
Terrestrial Habitat
113,447
100
As Cenozoico Terc_dois Xingu-A
Terrestrial Habitat
74,286
100
As Cretaceo Araguaia-Tocant
Terrestrial Habitat
48,757
60
As Cretaceo Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
13,788
40
As Cretaceo Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
233,263
60
As Cretaceo Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
14,795
60
As Cretaceo Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
84,788
60
As Cretaceo Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
13,937
60
As Paleozoico Araguaia-Tocant
Terrestrial Habitat
40,808
100
As Paleozoico Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
41,278
60
As Paleozoico Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
3,768,496
40
As Paleozoico Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
1,168,093
100
As Paleozoico Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
669,343
40
As Quaternario Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
17,273
60
As Quaternario Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
223,674
40
As Quaternario Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
35,015
60
C Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
52,577
20
C Paraguay
Terrestrial Habitat
103,040
20
Cb Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
87,521
20
Cs Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
179,664
40
Cs Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
370,063
60
D Cenozoico TercUM Japurá-Pu
Terrestrial Habitat
12,446
100
D Cenozoico TercUM Javari-Ju
Terrestrial Habitat
9,433
100
D Cenozoico TercUM Purus-Mad
Terrestrial Habitat
549,950
60
D Proterozoico Branco-Trombet
Terrestrial Habitat
324,309
40
D Proterozoico Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
28,210
40
D Proterozoico Jari-Foz Amazo
Terrestrial Habitat
248,796
40
D Proterozoico Madeira-Tapajo
Terrestrial Habitat
434,173
20
D Proterozoico Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
16,587
100
100
D Proterozoico Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
717,042
D Proterozoico Tocantins-Mear
Terrestrial Habitat
1,123,255
60
D Proterozoico Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
9,738
100
D Proterozoico Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
5,660,115
60
D Cenozoico Terc_dois Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
7,582
100
D Cenozoico Terc_dois Branco-T
Terrestrial Habitat
7,903
100
D Cenozoico Terc_dois Japurá-N
Terrestrial Habitat
39,008
60
D Cenozoico Terc_dois Japurá-P
Terrestrial Habitat
78,874
40
D Cenozoico Terc_dois Javari-J
Terrestrial Habitat
34,353
60
D Cenozoico Terc_dois Madeira-
Terrestrial Habitat
40,410
60
D Cenozoico Terc_dois Purus-Ma
Terrestrial Habitat
84,082
100
D Cenozoico Terc_dois Solimões
Terrestrial Habitat
9,194
100
D Cenozoico Terc_dois Tapajos-
Terrestrial Habitat
51,799
40
D Cenozoico Terc_dois Tocantin
Terrestrial Habitat
2,985,443
40
D Cenozoico Terc_dois Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
6,698
40
285
D Cenozoico Terc_dois Xingu-Ar
Terrestrial Habitat
96,779
60
D Cretaceo Araguaia-Tocant
Terrestrial Habitat
94,911
60
D Cretaceo Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
227,955
40
D Cretaceo Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
71,951
40
D Cretaceo Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
105,200
40
D Cretaceo Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
222,421
40
D Cretaceo Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
18,712
40
D Cretaceo Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
749,017
40
D Cretaceo Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
4,904,280
60
D Cretaceo Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
217,657
60
D Cretaceo Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
427,556
60
D Paleozoico Araguaia-Tocant
Terrestrial Habitat
12,681
100
D Paleozoico Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
43,500
60
D Paleozoico Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
5,660
40
D Paleozoico Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
151,176
40
D Paleozoico Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
541,011
60
D Paleozoico Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
111,715
60
D Paleozoico Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
146,808
40
D Paleozoico Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
71,026
40
D Quaternario Araguaia-Tocant
Terrestrial Habitat
26,393
100
D Quaternario Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
16,580
100
D Quaternario Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
70,302
40
D Quaternario Japurá-Purus
Terrestrial Habitat
73,353
20
D Quaternario Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
914,652
40
D Quaternario Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
21,483
40
D Quaternario Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
77,828
20
D Quaternario Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
83,799
60
D Quaternario Solimões-Japurá
Terrestrial Habitat
9,327
20
D Quaternario Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
33,569
100
D Quaternario Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
152,254
100
D Quaternario Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
19,052
40
D Quaternario Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
105,674
100
D Terciario Litora Jari-Foz Am
Terrestrial Habitat
196,702
60
D Terciario Litora Tocantins-M
Terrestrial Habitat
5,815,691
60
D Terciario Litora Xingu-Aragu
Terrestrial Habitat
398,783
60
Da Cenozoico TercUM Japurá-P
Terrestrial Habitat
95,282
60
Da Cenozoico TercUM Javari-J
Terrestrial Habitat
82,718
100
100
Da Cenozoico TercUM Purus-Ma
Terrestrial Habitat
26,858
Da Cenozoico TercUM Solimões
Terrestrial Habitat
106,696
60
Da Proterozoico Branco-Trombe
Terrestrial Habitat
62,699
100
Da Proterozoico Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
5,644
60
Da Proterozoico Jari-Foz Amaz
Terrestrial Habitat
77,691
100
Da Proterozoico Madeira-Tapaj
Terrestrial Habitat
104,773
100
Da Proterozoico Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
7,257
100
Da Proterozoico Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
520,000
40
Da Proterozoico Trombetas-Jar
Terrestrial Habitat
212,487
40
Da Proterozoico Xingu-Araguai
Terrestrial Habitat
102,706
40
100
Da Cenozoico Terc_dois Branco-
Terrestrial Habitat
28,107
Da Cenozoico Terc_dois Japurá-
Terrestrial Habitat
318,243
60
Da Cenozoico Terc_dois Japurá-
Terrestrial Habitat
1,109,127
100
Da Cenozoico Terc_dois Javari-
Terrestrial Habitat
708,206
60
Da Cenozoico Terc_dois Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
194,197
60
286
Da Cenozoico Terc_dois Negro-B
Terrestrial Habitat
31,996
60
Da Cenozoico Terc_dois Purus-M
Terrestrial Habitat
607,958
60
Da Cenozoico Terc_dois Solimõe
Terrestrial Habitat
453,183
60
Da Cenozoico Terc_dois Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
20,044
100
Da Cenozoico Terc_dois Tocanti
Terrestrial Habitat
35,318
100
Da Cenozoico Terc_dois Xingu-A
Terrestrial Habitat
12,510
40
Da Cretaceo Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
72,629
60
Da Cretaceo Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
17,332
100
Da Cretaceo Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
21,635
60
Da Cretaceo Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
111,784
60
Da Cretaceo Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
28,649
100
Da Cretaceo Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
5,752
40
Da Cretaceo Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
8,700
40
Da Paleozoico Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
33,828
100
Da Paleozoico Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
256
20
Da Paleozoico Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
129,657
100
Da Paleozoico Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
85,605
100
Da Quaternario Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
584,889
100
Da Quaternario Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
1,289,943
60
Da Quaternario Japurá-Purus
Terrestrial Habitat
1,434,705
100
Da Quaternario Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
2,860,958
100
Da Quaternario Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
611,963
60
Da Quaternario Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
861,408
100
Da Quaternario Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
319,333
60
Da Quaternario Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
1,076,714
40
Da Quaternario Solimões-Japurá
Terrestrial Habitat
1,592,968
100
Da Quaternario Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
257,825
60
Da Quaternario Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
36,077
60
Da Quaternario Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
24,840
60
Da Quaternario Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
74,847
60
Da Terciario Litora Jari-Foz A
Terrestrial Habitat
43,571
60
Da Terciario Litora Tocantins-
Terrestrial Habitat
20,558
60
Da Terciario Litora Xingu-Arag
Terrestrial Habitat
155,029
100
Db Cenozoico TercUM Japurá-P
Terrestrial Habitat
4,179,741
40
Db Cenozoico TercUM Javari-J
Terrestrial Habitat
1,706,449
40
Db Cenozoico TercUM Purus-Ma
Terrestrial Habitat
2,837,908
60
Db Cenozoico TercUM Solimões
Terrestrial Habitat
1,154,656
60
Db Proterozoico Branco-Trombe
Terrestrial Habitat
1,041,040
100
Db Proterozoico Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
266,478
100
Db Proterozoico Jari-Foz Amaz
Terrestrial Habitat
1,379,372
100
Db Proterozoico Madeira-Tapaj
Terrestrial Habitat
665,272
60
Db Proterozoico Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
188,296
40
Db Proterozoico Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
86,337
60
Db Proterozoico Xingu-Araguai
Terrestrial Habitat
6,562
60
Db Cenozoico Terc_dois Branco-
Terrestrial Habitat
672,812
60
Db Cenozoico Terc_dois Japurá-
Terrestrial Habitat
9,297,737
100
Db Cenozoico Terc_dois Japurá-
Terrestrial Habitat
13,350,757
100
Db Cenozoico Terc_dois Javari-
Terrestrial Habitat
6,060,263
60
Db Cenozoico Terc_dois Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
4,702,860
60
Db Cenozoico Terc_dois Negro-B
Terrestrial Habitat
782,014
40
Db Cenozoico Terc_dois Purus-M
Terrestrial Habitat
6,586,081
100
Db Cenozoico Terc_dois Solimõe
Terrestrial Habitat
2,346,839
60
287
Db Cenozoico Terc_dois Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
351,514
60
Db Cenozoico Terc_dois Trombet
Terrestrial Habitat
5,054
100
Db Cretaceo Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
4,146,365
100
Db Cretaceo Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
677,593
60
Db Cretaceo Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
629,947
100
Db Cretaceo Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
67,462
60
Db Cretaceo Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
7,204,147
60
Db Cretaceo Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
57,709
20
Db Cretaceo Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
1,682,267
60
Db Cretaceo Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
113,041
60
Db Cretaceo Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
525,571
60
Db Cretaceo Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
2,180,126
100
Db Paleozoico Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
345,699
60
Db Paleozoico Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
258,962
60
Db Paleozoico Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
12,325
100
Db Paleozoico Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
310,685
60
Db Paleozoico Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
31,823
60
Db Paleozoico Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
75,084
100
Db Quaternario Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
196,384
40
Db Quaternario Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
404,006
60
Db Quaternario Japurá-Purus
Terrestrial Habitat
515,418
60
Db Quaternario Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
287,820
100
Db Quaternario Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
305,441
60
Db Quaternario Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
263,653
40
Db Quaternario Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
21,586
40
Db Quaternario Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
362,446
60
Db Quaternario Solimões-Japurá
Terrestrial Habitat
172,016
100
Db Quaternario Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
24,628
40
Db Quaternario Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
5,179
60
Db Quaternario Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
13,890
100
Db Quaternario Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
117,852
100
Db Terciario Litora Jari-Foz A
Terrestrial Habitat
91,779
100
Db Terciario Litora Madeira-Ta
Terrestrial Habitat
9,131
60
Db Terciario Litora Tocantins-
Terrestrial Habitat
354,974
100
Db Terciario Litora Xingu-Arag
Terrestrial Habitat
744,546
100
Dm Proterozoico Branco-Trombe
Terrestrial Habitat
378,807
60
Dm Proterozoico Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
3,413,455
100
Dm Proterozoico Trombetas-Jar
Terrestrial Habitat
55,703
100
Ds Proterozoico Branco-Trombe
Terrestrial Habitat
13,132,650
100
Ds Proterozoico Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
845,927
100
Ds Proterozoico Jari-Foz Amaz
Terrestrial Habitat
7,757,311
100
Ds Proterozoico Madeira-Tapaj
Terrestrial Habitat
10,182,684
60
Ds Proterozoico Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
8,221,779
60
Ds Proterozoico Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
184,261
40
Ds Proterozoico Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
8,436,008
40
Ds Proterozoico Tocantins-Mea
Terrestrial Habitat
46,988
40
Ds Proterozoico Trombetas-Jar
Terrestrial Habitat
12,930,862
40
Ds Proterozoico Xingu-Araguai
Terrestrial Habitat
7,262,830
40
Ds Cenozoico Terc_dois Branco-
Terrestrial Habitat
171,238
40
Ds Cenozoico Terc_dois Japurá-
Terrestrial Habitat
1,544,898
60
Ds Cenozoico Terc_dois Jari-Fo
Terrestrial Habitat
21,849
40
Ds Cenozoico Terc_dois Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
1,069,146
40
288
Ds Cenozoico Terc_dois Negro-B
Terrestrial Habitat
606,292
60
Ds Cenozoico Terc_dois Purus-M
Terrestrial Habitat
5,291
100
Ds Cenozoico Terc_dois Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
729,168
100
Ds Cenozoico Terc_dois Tocanti
Terrestrial Habitat
1,110,968
60
Ds Cenozoico Terc_dois Trombet
Terrestrial Habitat
17,182
100
Ds Cretaceo Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
104,471
100
Ds Cretaceo Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
98,765
60
Ds Cretaceo Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
73,072
40
Ds Cretaceo Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
659,068
40
Ds Cretaceo Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
1,262,837
40
Ds Cretaceo Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
1,214,075
40
Ds Cretaceo Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
102,903
40
Ds Cretaceo Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
22,624
60
Ds Paleozoico Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
966,846
40
Ds Paleozoico Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
219,956
40
Ds Paleozoico Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
3,001,141
60
Ds Paleozoico Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
1,138,301
60
Ds Paleozoico Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
1,090,255
100
Ds Paleozoico Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
8,838
40
Ds Quaternario Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
23,679
20
Ds Quaternario Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
41,174
20
Ds Quaternario Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
12,241
20
Ds Quaternario Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
204,189
40
Ds Quaternario Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
74,314
40
Ds Quaternario Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
79,631
20
Ds Quaternario Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
10,012
40
Ds Terciario Litora Jari-Foz A
Terrestrial Habitat
55,116
60
Ds Terciario Litora Madeira-Ta
Terrestrial Habitat
14,418
100
Ds Terciario Litora Negro-Bran
Terrestrial Habitat
13,564
40
Ds Terciario Litora Tapajos-Xi
Terrestrial Habitat
6,517
40
Ds Terciario Litora Tocantins-
Terrestrial Habitat
83,875
40
Ds Terciario Litora Trombetas-
Terrestrial Habitat
20,856
60
Ds Terciario Litora Xingu-Arag
Terrestrial Habitat
23,896
20
F Araguaia-Tocant
Terrestrial Habitat
15,216
60
F Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
29,006
40
F Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
2,377,109
60
F Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
18,451
40
F Paraguay
Terrestrial Habitat
1,334,823
40
F Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
270,546
60
F Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
217,844
60
F Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
273,632
100
Fa Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
9,056
60
Fa Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
218,217
100
Fa Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
60,328
60
Fa Paraguay
Terrestrial Habitat
102,006
60
Fa Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
127,404
60
Fb Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
283,744
40
Fb Paraguay
Terrestrial Habitat
97,372
60
Fm Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
92,165
60
Fs Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
564,597
60
Fs Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
5,234,312
100
Fs Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
1,582,953
60
289
Fs Paraguay
Terrestrial Habitat
40,523
60
Fs Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
7,549,584
100
Fs Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
2,374,722
100
L Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
35,733
100
L Japurá-Purus
Terrestrial Habitat
10,098
60
L Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
7,848
60
La Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
108,951
100
La Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
1,257,894
60
La Japurá-Purus
Terrestrial Habitat
14,404
40
La Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
9,956
60
La Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
848,347
40
La Solimões-Japurá
Terrestrial Habitat
21,172
60
La Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
92,442
20
La Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
14,533
40
La Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
21,486
20
Lb Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
92,838
20
Lb Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
385,705
20
Lb Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
759,222
60
Lb Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
27,050
20
Lb Solimões-Japurá
Terrestrial Habitat
12,621
100
Ld Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
1,524,739
20
Ld Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
5,440,462
20
Ld Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
35,657
60
Ld Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
5,420,465
40
Ld Solimões-Japurá
Terrestrial Habitat
350,362
100
Ld Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
154,548
40
Lg Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
486,546
40
Lg Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
147,025
100
Lg Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
40,448
40
Lg Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
863,939
40
Lg Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
63,787
100
Lg Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
43,962
60
Lg Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
58,779
60
LO Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
179,815
60
LO Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
317,265
40
LO Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
32,456
40
LO Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
1,249,727
40
LO Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
6,125
60
ON Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
1,628,194
100
ON Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
94,476
40
ON Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
952,627
60
ON Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
1,161,141
40
P Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
17,011
40
P Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
99,484
40
Pa Japurá-Purus
Terrestrial Habitat
20,515
100
Pa Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
50,671
100
Pa Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
6,004
100
Pa Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
464,594
100
Pa Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
67,244
60
Paa Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
22,343
60
Paa Japurá-Purus
Terrestrial Habitat
18,936
60
Paa Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
384,273
100
290
Paa Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
54,943
60
Paa Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
411,850
100
Paa Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
88,721
100
Paa Solimões-Japurá
Terrestrial Habitat
76,850
100
Paa Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
373,125
60
Paa Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
221,708
100
Paa Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
15,639
100
Paa Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
319,061
100
Pah Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
248,875
100
Pah Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
9,595
40
Pah Japurá-Purus
Terrestrial Habitat
34,250
100
Pah Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
2,077,206
40
Pah Javari-Juruá
Terrestrial Habitat
9,935
60
Pah Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
816,583
60
Pah Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
23,720
60
Pah Solimões-Japurá
Terrestrial Habitat
33,021
100
Pah Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
615,546
60
Pah Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
187,247
60
Pah Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
357,422
60
Pah Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
77,593
60
Pf Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
316,436
60
Pf Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
780,309
60
rl Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
6,668
60
rm Japurá-Negro
Terrestrial Habitat
9,587
40
rm Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
74,621
20
rm Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
271,732
40
rm Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
12,719
100
S Araguaia-Tocant
Terrestrial Habitat
146,574
20
S Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
7,012
40
S Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
252,615
100
S Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
1,568,040
100
S Paraguay
Terrestrial Habitat
155,063
100
S Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
145,089
60
S Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
1,883,878
60
S Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
11,761
100
S Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
576,583
40
S Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
1,909,683
100
Sa Araguaia-Tocant
Terrestrial Habitat
148,517
60
Sa Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
281,522
40
Sa Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
71,926
100
Sa Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
1,235,897
100
Sa Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
187,914
40
Sa Paraguay
Terrestrial Habitat
329,739
100
Sa Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
81,920
60
Sa Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
372,077
100
Sa Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
9,246
100
Sa Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
145,957
60
Sa Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
681,499
60
Sg Araguaia-Tocant
Terrestrial Habitat
26,948
40
Sg Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
519,670
100
Sg Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
93,110
100
Sg Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
81,645
40
291
Sg Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
199,659
20
Sg Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
99,242
100
Sg Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
382,751
20
SN Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
605,881
60
SN Paraguay
Terrestrial Habitat
535,431
60
SN Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
351,048
60
SN Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
52,314
60
SN Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
362,901
100
SO Araguaia-Tocant
Terrestrial Habitat
297,455
40
SO Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
27,806
60
SO Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
1,277,128
100
SO Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
191,791
60
SO Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
30,295
40
SO Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
10,884
60
SO Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
17,863
40
SO Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
668,929
40
Sp Araguaia-Tocant
Terrestrial Habitat
5,738
100
Sp Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
74,227
60
100
Sp Jari-Foz Amazon
Terrestrial Habitat
886,861
Sp Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
1,352,533
60
Sp Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
684,383
100
Sp Paraguay
Terrestrial Habitat
86,530
60
Sp Purus-Madeira
Terrestrial Habitat
282,840
60
Sp Tapajos-Xingu
Terrestrial Habitat
288,850
100
Sp Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
63,801
100
Sp Trombetas-Jari
Terrestrial Habitat
876,513
60
Sp Xingu-Araguaia
Terrestrial Habitat
657,418
60
SPP Tocantins-Meari
Terrestrial Habitat
9,480
60
ST Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
6,400
60
T Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
37,021
60
Td Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
93,706
60
Td Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
53,951
60
Tg Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
215,137
100
Tg Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
28,532
60
TN Madeira-Tapajos
Terrestrial Habitat
57,445
60
Tp Branco-Trombeta
Terrestrial Habitat
74,244
100
Tp Negro-Branco
Terrestrial Habitat
62,117
100
Alagada
Habitat_Sustainable Use
35,413,492
40
Alto Potencial Madeireiro
Habitat_Sustainable Use
140,668,149
100
Aves_Belem
Aves Endemism
17,671,511
40
Aves_Duidae Sub
Aves Endemism
5,131,678
100
Aves_Gran_Sabana
Aves Endemism
2,820,244
100
Aves_Guiana
Aves Endemism
61,930,796
40
Aves_Imeri
Aves Endemism
5,285,191
60
Aves_Inambari
Aves Endemism
78,931,415
60
Aves_Napo
Aves Endemism
10,989,820
60
Aves_Rondonia
Aves Endemism
48,936,849
60
Aves_Tapajos
Aves Endemism
61,095,825
40
Araguaia
Papilionidae Endemism
10,620,518
60
Belem
Papilionidae Endemism
25,507,442
100
Guapore
Papilionidae Endemism
7,292,988
60
Imeri
Papilionidae Endemism
22,062,223
40
292
Inambari
Papilionidae Endemism
11,443,534
60
Loreto
Papilionidae Endemism
4,786,747
60
Madeira
Papilionidae Endemism
15,944,502
40
Manaus-Guiana
Papilionidae Endemism
46,037,235
100
Oyapok
Papilionidae Endemism
7,985,429
40
Rondonia
Papilionidae Endemism
7,896,083
40
Roraima
Papilionidae Endemism
16,599,351
40
Tapajos
Papilionidae Endemism
80,315,877
40
Tefe
Papilionidae Endemism
4,082,812
60
Ucayali
Papilionidae Endemism
9,612,293
60
BF_ACARA_um
River Buffer Zone
1,058,286
60
BF_ARAGUAIA_III
River Buffer Zone
73,201
60
BF_ARAGUAIA_IV
River Buffer Zone
402,562
100
BF_ARAGUAIA_V
River Buffer Zone
845,792
40
BF_FZ AM_II
River Buffer Zone
5,165,239
60
BF_FZ AM_III
River Buffer Zone
186,247
100
BF_FZ AM_IV
River Buffer Zone
33,739
100
BF_FZ AM_IV
River Buffer Zone
228,905
100
BF_FZ AM_um
River Buffer Zone
61,035
40
BF_FZ AM_um
River Buffer Zone
154,826
100
BF_FZ AM_V
River Buffer Zone
21,159
100
BF_FZ AM_V
River Buffer Zone
129,894
60
BF_FZ TO_um
River Buffer Zone
599,238
60
BF_GUAMA_um
River Buffer Zone
709,399
60
BF_GURUPI_II
River Buffer Zone
216,245
40
BF_GURUPI_um
River Buffer Zone
260,641
60
BF_ICA_um
River Buffer Zone
985,898
60
BF_IRIRI_um
River Buffer Zone
3,017,972
60
BF_ITAPECURU_um
River Buffer Zone
56
60
BF_ITAPECURU_um
River Buffer Zone
222,232
100
BF_JAMANXIM_um
River Buffer Zone
1,309,389
60
BF_JAPURA_um
River Buffer Zone
6,026,157
40
BF_JARI_um
River Buffer Zone
1,043,863
100
BF_JATAPU_um
River Buffer Zone
160,025
40
BF_JATAPU_um
River Buffer Zone
4,861,126
60
BF_JAURU_um
River Buffer Zone
20,444
60
BF_JAVARI_um
River Buffer Zone
1,201,416
60
BF_JUREMA_um
River Buffer Zone
2,941,696
60
BF_JURUA_II
River Buffer Zone
1,326,212
60
BF_JURUA_III
River Buffer Zone
3,180,822
100
BF_JURUA_um
River Buffer Zone
516,114
60
BF_JUTAI_um
River Buffer Zone
2,554,328
40
BF_LT AP_II
River Buffer Zone
1,030,459
40
BF_LT AP_II
River Buffer Zone
3,719
40
BF_LT AP_um
River Buffer Zone
265,467
60
BF_LT MA_um
River Buffer Zone
74,271
60
BF_LT PA_II
River Buffer Zone
269,166
60
BF_LT PA_II
River Buffer Zone
233,655
60
BF_LT PA_um
River Buffer Zone
157,967
40
BF_MADEIRA_II
River Buffer Zone
273,560
40
BF_MADEIRA_III
River Buffer Zone
903,756
100
BF_MADEIRA_IV
River Buffer Zone
497,055
60
293
BF_MADEIRA_IX
River Buffer Zone
4,099,095
60
BF_MADEIRA_um
River Buffer Zone
776,054
60
BF_MADEIRA_V
River Buffer Zone
1,895,646
60
BF_MADEIRA_VI
River Buffer Zone
3,457,476
100
BF_MADEIRA_VII
River Buffer Zone
5,922,018
60
BF_MADEIRA_VIII
River Buffer Zone
2,005,732
60
BF_MEARIM_um
River Buffer Zone
1,063,257
100
BF_MUNIM_um
River Buffer Zone
57,799
100
BF_NEGRO_II
River Buffer Zone
4,750,657
60
BF_NEGRO_III
River Buffer Zone
913,386
60
BF_NEGRO_IV
River Buffer Zone
3,486,762
100
BF_NEGRO_um
River Buffer Zone
7,285,682
20
BF_OIAPOQU_um
River Buffer Zone
264,961
100
BF_PARA_um
River Buffer Zone
1,905,090
20
BF_PARAGUAI_um
River Buffer Zone
8,185
20
BF_PARU_um
River Buffer Zone
2,447,108
20
BF_PERICUMA_um
River Buffer Zone
702,169
20
BF_PURUS_II
River Buffer Zone
18,342
20
BF_PURUS_III
River Buffer Zone
3,907,955
100
BF_PURUS_IV
River Buffer Zone
4,657,587
20
BF_PURUS_um
River Buffer Zone
887,942
20
BF_SEPOTUBA_um
River Buffer Zone
2,946
20
BF_TAPAJOS_II
River Buffer Zone
2,086,072
20
BF_TAPAJOS_um
River Buffer Zone
1,522,039
20
BF_TELES PIRES_um
River Buffer Zone
137,494
100
BF_TELES PIRES_um
River Buffer Zone
2,573,176
100
BF_TOCANTINS_IX
River Buffer Zone
505,822
100
BF_TOCANTINS_VII
River Buffer Zone
186,233
20
BF_TOCANTINS_VIII
River Buffer Zone
1,362,480
20
BF_TROMBETAS_um
River Buffer Zone
3,612,384
20
BF_TURIACU_um
River Buffer Zone
94,838
20
BF_TURIACU_um
River Buffer Zone
334,310
20
BF_UACA_um
River Buffer Zone
95,570
100
BF_XINGU_II
River Buffer Zone
2,684,349
100
BF_XINGU_III
River Buffer Zone
2,057,581
20
BF_XINGU_um
River Buffer Zone
1,676,018
20
Alouatta belzebul
Primate_Species
76,821,829
20
Alouatta macconnelli
Primate_Species
96,380,207
66
Alouatta nigerrima
Primate_Species
22,112,077
20
Alouatta puruensis
Primate_Species
103,282,965
20
Alouatta seniculus
Primate_Species
73,803,769
20
Alouatta ululata
Primate_Species
1,099,642
20
Aotus azarai infulatus
Primate_Species
153,908,734
20
Aotus nancymaae
Primate_Species
13,766,895
20
Aotus nigriceps
Primate_Species
143,606,849
100
Aotus trivirgatus
Primate_Species
50,823,380
96
Aotus vociferans
Primate_Species
34,911,101
20
Ateles belzebuth
Primate_Species
65,814,573
100
Ateles chamek
Primate_Species
172,623,472
100
Ateles marginatus
Primate_Species
89,011,192
100
Ateles paniscus
Primate_Species
68,251,023
100
Cacajao melanocephalus oukary
Primate_Species
38,643,433
20
294
Cacajao calvus calvus
Primate_Species
1,423,403
100
Cacajao calvus novaesi
Primate_Species
1,890,860
20
Cacajao calvus rubicundus
Primate_Species
1,995,019
20
Callicebus baptista
Primate_Species
1,283,006
100
Callicebus bernhardi
Primate_Species
12,181,604
20
Callicebus brunneus
Primate_Species
36,331,568
20
Callicebus caligatus
Primate_Species
6,998,215
81
Callicebus cinerascens
Primate_Species
14,186,500
20
Callicebus cupreus
Primate_Species
47,433,011
20
Callicebus dubius
Primate_Species
12,933,599
20
Callicebus hoffmannsi
Primate_Species
10,066,014
20
Callicebus lucifer
Primate_Species
7,546,998
20
Callicebus lugens
Primate_Species
34,261,550
20
Callicebus moloch
Primate_Species
94,321,131
20
Callicebus purinus
Primate_Species
15,510,594
20
Callicebus regulus
Primate_Species
22,227,361
20
Callicebus stephennashi
Primate_Species
3,269,044
20
Callimico goeldii
Primate_Species
28,518,145
20
Cebuella pygmaea niveiventris
Primate_Species
92,420,395
20
Cebuella pygmaea pygmaea
Primate_Species
7,851,068
20
Cebus albifrons
Primate_Species
181,715,354
20
Cebus apella
Primate_Species
264,738,484
92
Cebus kaapori
Primate_Species
16,553,148
20
Cebus macrocephalus
Primate_Species
106,580,622
20
Cebus olivaceus
Primate_Species
86,618,235
20
Chiropotes albinasus
Primate_Species
102,699,290
20
Chiropotes satanas chiropotes
Primate_Species
90,003,066
20
Chiropotes satanas satanas
Primate_Species
26,024,780
20
Chiropotes satanas utahickae
Primate_Species
36,334,311
20
Lagothrix cana cana
Primate_Species
134,377,131
20
Lagothrix lagotricha
Primate_Species
39,650,962
20
Lagothrix poeppigii
Primate_Species
26,226,581
20
Mico acariensis
Primate_Species
3,689,107
20
Mico argentatus
Primate_Species
13,519,714
20
Mico cf emiliae
Primate_Species
8,037,620
100
Mico chrysoleucus
Primate_Species
2,565,408
20
Mico emiliae
Primate_Species
15,516,599
100
Mico humeralifer
Primate_Species
7,642,721
100
Mico humillis
Primate_Species
1,655
100
Mico intermedius
Primate_Species
6,740,304
20
Mico leucippe
Primate_Species
1,559,814
20
Mico manicorensi
Primate_Species
2,173,256
20
Mico marcai
Primate_Species
25,642
20
Mico mauesi
Primate_Species
2,034,302
20
Mico melanurus
Primate_Species
12,367,404
20
Mico nigriceps
Primate_Species
3,119,694
20
Mico saterei
Primate_Species
2,023,392
20
Pithecia albicans
Primate_Species
8,688,476
20
Pithecia irrorata irrorata
Primate_Species
117,306,105
20
Pithecia irrorata vanzolinii
Primate_Species
7,932,460
20
Pithecia monacha monacha
Primate_Species
34,113,903
20
Pithecia pithecia chrysocephal
Primate_Species
23,305,086
20
295
Pithecia pithecia pithecia
Primate_Species
42,441,762
20
Saguinus bicolor
Primate_Species
4,544,883
100
Saguinus fuscicollis avilapire
Primate_Species
9,909,785
15
Saguinus fuscicollis fuscicoll
Primate_Species
15,105,169
15
Saguinus fuscicollis fuscus
Primate_Species
5,896,459
15
Saguinus fuscicollis melanoleu
Primate_Species
1,222,534
15
Saguinus fuscicollis primitivu
Primate_Species
6,088
15
Saguinus fuscicollis weddelli
Primate_Species
43,594,063
15
Saguinus imperator
Primate_Species
18,138,220
15
Saguinus inustus
Primate_Species
15,416,460
10
Saguinus labiatus labiatus
Primate_Species
13,137,185
15
Saguinus labiatus rufirventer
Primate_Species
9,364,512
15
Saguinus labiatus thomasi
Primate_Species
2,096,262
15
Saguinus martinsi martinsi
Primate_Species
2,498,302
10
Saguinus martinsi ochraceus
Primate_Species
1,825,946
15
Saguinus midas
Primate_Species
82,484,231
15
Saguinus mystax mystax
Primate_Species
26,046,989
15
Saguinus mystax pileatus
Primate_Species
24,009,107
15
Saguinus mystax pluto
Primate_Species
12,754,309
15
Saguinus niger
Primate_Species
51,439,026
10
Saguinus nigricollis nigricoll
Primate_Species
1,773,637
15
Saimiri sciureus cassiquiaren
Primate_Species
41,679,933
10
Saimiri boliviensis boliviensi
Primate_Species
49,268,876
15
Saimiri sciureus macrodon
Primate_Species
32,137,376
10
Saimiri sciureus sciureus
Primate_Species
203,543,600
10
Saimiri ustus
Primate_Species
87,253,485
20
Saimiri vanzolinii
Primate_Species
281,315
20
Jarina
Species_Sustainable Use
28,685,578
20
Mogno
Species_Sustainable Use
190,555,798
20
Piacava
Species_Sustainable Use
27,909,143
20
Environmental Service
126,461,859
20
Clima
Table 11.10.2 – List of Conservation Targets and Goals for the Pantanal Biome.
TARGET NAME
TYPE
AREA (ha)
GOAL (%)
Certophrys cranwelli
Amphibia
110,826
60
Chiasmocleis albopunctata W B
Amphibia
4,698
100
Chiasmocleis mehelyi
Amphibia
4,698
100
Dendropsophus melanargyreus
Amphibia
14,166
100
Epipedobates braccatus
Amphibia
111,663
60
Leptodactylus elenae
Amphibia
21,069
80
Leptodactylus syphax
Amphibia
51,624
70
Physalaemus albonotatus
Amphibia
9,612
100
Physalaemus fuscomaculatus
Amphibia
14,553
100
70
Physalaemus nattereri
Amphibia
50,679
Scinax acuminatus
Amphibia
61,317
60
Scinax megapodius
Amphibia
14,166
100
Alectrurus tricolor
Aves
62,460
70
Alipiopsitta xanthops
Aves
613,692
50
Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus
Aves
929,781
50
100
Anthus nattereri
Aves
31,977
Basileuterus leucophrys
Aves
96,633
70
Callonetta leucophrys
Aves
122,427
60
296
Campephilus leucopogon
Aves
115,452
70
Charitospiza eucosma
Aves
42,102
50
Euscarthmus rufomarginatus
Aves
122,877
60
Geositta poeciloptera
Aves
46,854
100
Harpyhaliaetus coronatus
Aves
264,942
70
Herpsilochmus longirostris
Aves
437,409
50
Inezia inornata
Aves
176,373
50
Knipolegus striaticeps
Aves
47,529
80
Melanerpes cactorum
Aves
237,789
50
Mimus triurus
Aves
512,280
50
Mirmochilus strigilatus
Aves
47,529
80
Neochen jubata
Aves
58,131
70
Netta peposaca
Aves
47,529
80
Nystalus striatipectus
Aves
198,036
70
Penelope ochrogaster
Aves
859,104
70
Penelope superciliaris
Aves
116,937
60
Phaethornis subochraceus
Aves
221,202
60
Phalaropus tricolor
Aves
25,191
80
Pheucticus aureoventris
Aves
92,457
50
Picumnus aurifrons
Aves
25,191
80
Polystictus pectoralis pectoralis
Aves
129,177
80
Poospiza cinerea
Aves
65,529
70
Poospiza melanoleuca
Aves
174,087
50
Porphyrospiza caerulescens
Aves
48,987
70
Primolius maracana
Aves
54,441
70
Pyriglena leuconota
Aves
122,400
60
Pyrrhura devillei
Aves
150,516
100
100
Pyrrhura molinae
Aves
63,522
Rhea americana
Aves
600,993
70
Rollandia rolland
Aves
61,047
70
Saltator aurantirostris
Aves
47,529
80
Sicalis citrina
Aves
62,991
70
Sicalis luteola
Aves
123,147
60
Sporiphila hypochroma
Aves
62,460
60
Sporophila cinnamomea
Aves
312,201
70
Sporophila maximiliani
Aves
113,994
60
Sporophila nigrorufa
Aves
179,829
70
Sporophila palustris
Aves
267,948
70
Sporophila ruficollis
Aves
286,587
70
Suiriri islerorum
Aves
41,985
100
Synallaxis simoni
Aves
64,746
70
Taoniscus nanus
Aves
65,448
70
Thamnophilus sticturus
Aves
204,498
50
Aves
110,547
50
Mammalia
19,854
100
Thryothorus guarayanus
Akodon toba
Aotus azarae
Mammalia
150,435
100
Blastocerus dichotomus
Mammalia
1,546,875
30
Callicebus pallescens
Mammalia
244,530
100
Chrysocyon brachyurus
Mammalia
3,655,611
30
Clyomys bishopi
Mammalia
28,719
80
Criptonanus chacoensis
Mammalia
61,263
70
Ctenomys nattereri
Mammalia
12,177
100
297
Leopardus colocolo
Mammalia
12,920,121
30
Leopardus pardalis mitis
Mammalia
12,927,366
30
Leopardus tigrinus
Mammalia
12,947,445
30
Leopardus wiedii
Mammalia
12,927,366
30
Marmosops ocellatus
Mammalia
71,091
100
Monodelphis kunsi
Mammalia
30,438
100
Myotis simus
Mammalia
30,114
80
Myrmecophaga tridactyla
Mammalia
11,767,392
30
Oecomys mamorae
Mammalia
236,970
70
Ozotoceros bezoarticus leucogast
Mammalia
1,535,634
30
Panthera onca
Mammalia
6,150,465
70
100
Priodontes maximus
Mammalia
105,030
Pteronura brasiliensis
Mammalia
6,176,799
60
Speothos venaticus
Mammalia
204,822
70
Tapirus terrestris
Mammalia
12,953,754
30
Tayassu pecari
Mammalia
12,953,754
30
Mammalia
48,294
80
Landscape
810,657
30
Aquidauana
Corixo Grande
Landscape
742,779
30
Cuiabá
Landscape
1,323,675
30
Floresta seca, morros
Landscape
129,339
70
Leque do Taquari
Landscape
284,202
30
Miranda
Landscape
425,736
30
Nabileque
Landscape
997,245
30
Nhecolândia
Landscape
715,572
30
Outras florestas, planícies (onduladas)
Landscape
54,558
70
Outras florestas, terras planas (planas)
Landscape
426,636
30
Paraguai
Landscape
1,496,592
30
Piquiri/São Lourenço
Landscape
1,370,322
30
Rio Taquari
Landscape
3,519,891
30
Savana densa, planícies
Landscape
34,641
80
Savana, planícies
Landscape
37,008
80
SDFS planícies (terras planas)
Landscape
320,967
30
SDSF (floresta seca), mosaico LF
Landscape
256,851
30
SESF planícies (onduladas)
Landscape
621
100
Rio Cabaþal
Fish pro
972
100
Rio Miranda
Fish pro
15,714
100
Rio Negro
Fish pro
42,102
100
Achatocarpus praecox
Plantae
23,256
80
Aechmea bromeliifolia
Plantae
3,402
100
Aspidosperma macrocarpon
Plantae
7,272
100
Aspidosperma nobile
Plantae
6,345
100
Aspilia grazielae
Plantae
4,041
100
Astronium fraxinifolium
Plantae
83,475
70
Cyrtopodium fowliei
Plantae
8,154
100
Gomphrena centrota
Plantae
53,883
70
Myracrodruon urundeuva
Plantae
44,856
80
100
Schinopsis brasiliensis
Plantae
12,042
Sideroxylon obtusifoLium
Plantae
66,573
70
Tillandsia duratii
Plantae
3,402
100
Zamia boliviana
Plantae
8,244
100
Acanthochelis macrocephala
Reptilia
125,919
30
298
Amphisbaena camura
Reptilia
128,475
50
Amphisbaena leeseri
Reptilia
42,786
100
Anolis meridionalis Pantanal B
Reptilia
256,077
10
Apostolepis borelli
Reptilia
95,859
100
Apostolepis christineae
Reptilia
19,980
100
Apostolepis dimidiata
Reptilia
16,110
100
Apostolepis vittata
Reptilia
82,989
70
Bachia cacerensis
Reptilia
58,905
100
Bothrops mattogrossensis
Reptilia
216,369
30
Cercolophia absaberi
Reptilia
36,702
100
Cercolophia cuiabana
Reptilia
3,834
100
Cercolophia steindachneri
Reptilia
19,404
100
Chironius quadricarinatus
Reptilia
42,786
10
Clelia bicolor
Reptilia
210,177
30
Cnemidophorus cf parecis
Reptilia
63,009
100
Coleodactylus brachystoma
Reptilia
66,897
70
Dracaena paraguayensis
Reptilia
293,841
30
Drymoluber brazili
Reptilia
16,110
100
Eunectes notaeus
Reptilia
226,539
20
Gonatodes cf hasemanni
Reptilia
61,686
100
Gonatodes hasemanni
Reptilia
51,201
100
30
Hoplocercus spinosus
Reptilia
42,093
Hydrops caesurus
Reptilia
51,201
70
Kentropyx viridistriga
Reptilia
28,242
80
Kentropyx cf viridistriga
Reptilia
127,737
50
Kentropyx vanzoi
Reptilia
28,242
80
Liophis meridionalis
Reptilia
93,006
70
Lygodactylus wetzeli
Reptilia
184,977
100
Lystrophis matogrossensis
Reptilia
233,478
30
Mabuya guaporicola
Reptilia
235,827
20
Micrurus pyrrhocryptus
Reptilia
106,344
100
Micrurus tricolor
Reptilia
196,353
20
Oxyrhopus rhombifer W
Reptilia
234,072
10
Pantodactylus albostrigatus
Reptilia
62,658
10
Phalotris matogrossensis
Reptilia
65,520
70
Phalotris nasutus
Reptilia
63,009
20
Philodryas livida
Reptilia
78,156
100
Philodryas mattogrossensis
Reptilia
172,530
80
Philodryas psammophidea
Reptilia
21,168
80
Phimophis guerini
Reptilia
81,792
70
Psomophis genimaculatus
Reptilia
172,845
30
Stenocercus caducus
Reptilia
153,072
100
Thamnodynastes chaquensis
Reptilia
311,247
10
Tropidurus guarani
Reptilia
158,256
30
Tupinambis quadrilineatus
Reptilia
19,980
100
Xenopholis sp
Reptilia
126,630
60
Table 11.10.3 – List of Conservation Targets and Goals for the Cerrado Biome.
NAME
TYPE
AREA (ha)
GOAL (%)
Adenomera martinezi
Amphibia
27,603,769
20
Barycholos ternetzi
Amphibia
38,351,244
20
Bokermannohyla alvarengai
Amphibia
2,899,475
80
299
Bokermannohyla ibitiguara
Amphibia
58,856
100
Bokermannohyla izecksohni
Amphibia
15,288
100
Bokermannohyla martinsi
Amphibia
293,000
80
Bokermannohyla nanuzae
Amphibia
187,456
100
Bokermannohyla pseudopseud
Amphibia
3,743,238
30
100
Bokermannohyla ravida
Amphibia
35,331
Bokermannohyla saxicola
Amphibia
622,763
80
Bokermannohyla sazimai
Amphibia
82,144
80
Bufo ocellatus
Amphibia
54,765,038
20
Chaunus veredas
Amphibia
11,152,788
50
Chiasmocleis albopunctata
Amphibia
37,833,813
10
Chiasmocleis albopunctata
Amphibia
11,902,106
10
Chiasmocleis centralis
Amphibia
242,356
50
Chiasmocleis mehelyi
Amphibia
27,494
20
Colostethus brunneus A
Amphibia
94,831
100
Colostethus cf brunneus B
Amphibia
318,056
70
Colostethus goianus
Amphibia
212,125
70
Crossodactylus bokermanni
Amphibia
84,694
100
Crossodactylus trachystomu
Amphibia
49,206
100
Dendropsophus anataliasias
Amphibia
8,804,388
10
Dendropsophus araguaya
Amphibia
70,444
50
Dendropsophus cerradensis
Amphibia
30,025
100
Dendropsophus cruzi
Amphibia
13,124,925
10
Dendropsophus melanargyreu
Amphibia
68,745,288
10
Dendropsophus rubicundulus
Amphibia
67,020,400
10
Eleutherodactylus dundeei
Amphibia
165,975
50
Epipedobates braccatus
Amphibia
240,975
100
Epipedobates flavopictus
Amphibia
14,579,125
20
Hypsiboas buriti
Amphibia
955,900
70
Hypsiboas cipoensis
Amphibia
518,556
80
Hypsiboas ericae
Amphibia
414,744
100
Hypsiboas goianus
Amphibia
2,525,494
30
Hypsiboas lundii
Amphibia
30,250,006
10
Hypsiboas phaeopleura
Amphibia
120,231
100
Leptodactylus camaquara
Amphibia
1,916,663
70
Leptodactylus cf petersii
Amphibia
67,713
100
Leptodactylus cunicularius
Amphibia
307,625
100
Leptodactylus elenae
Amphibia
116,275
10
Leptodactylus furnarius
Amphibia
57,981,719
30
Leptodactylus jolyi
Amphibia
413,369
30
Leptodactylus pustulatus
Amphibia
38,971,300
20
Leptodactylus syphax
Amphibia
81,319,269
10
Leptodactylus tapiti
Amphibia
203,775
100
Lysapsus caraya
Amphibia
137,819
70
Melanophryniscus fulvogutt
Amphibia
54,569
50
Odontophrynus moratoi
Amphibia
20,306
100
Odontophrynus salvatori
Amphibia
1,399,944
70
Phasmahyla jandaia
Amphibia
202,919
100
Phyllomedusa centralis
Amphibia
50,169
100
Phyllomedusa megacephala
Amphibia
169,900
100
Phyllomedusa oreades
Amphibia
2,738,131
70
Phyllomedusa sauvagei
Amphibia
75,963
50
300
Physalaemus albonotatus
Amphibia
419,531
10
Physalaemus deimaticus
Amphibia
230,275
100
Physalaemus evangelistai
Amphibia
312,575
100
Physalaemus fuscomaculatus
Amphibia
30,975,763
10
Physalaemus nattereri
Amphibia
56,771,713
10
100
Proceratophrys cururu
Amphibia
315,850
Proceratophrys goyana
Amphibia
6,423,088
50
Pseudis bolbodactyla
Amphibia
23,130,131
30
Pseudis tocantins
Amphibia
420,931
70
Pseudopaludicola ameghini
Amphibia
21,513,406
10
Pseudopaludicola mineira
Amphibia
1,257,538
80
Pseudopaludicola mystacali
Amphibia
64,951,475
10
Pseudopaludicola saltica
Amphibia
55,958,406
10
Rhinella scitula
Amphibia
112,125
100
Scinax acuminatus
Amphibia
2,165,881
10
100
Scinax canastrensis
Amphibia
86,350
Scinax centralis
Amphibia
594,781
70
Scinax constrictus
Amphibia
6,235,375
10
Scinax curicica
Amphibia
456,338
100
Scinax machadoi
Amphibia
175,175
60
Scinax maracaya
Amphibia
112,375
100
Scinax megapodius
Amphibia
11,625
100
Scinax nasicus
Amphibia
73,244
10
Scinax pinima
Amphibia
116,975
100
Thoropa megatimpanum
Amphibia
2,634,025
70
Araguaia - Facies depósito
Aquifer
5,703,731
30
Araguaia - Facies terraços
Aquifer
162,688
70
Areado
Aquifer
794,655
50
Barreiras
Aquifer
497,871
80
Bauru
Aquifer
433,450
70
Botucatu
Aquifer
1,879,731
30
Cabeças, Grupo Canindé
Aquifer
716,319
80
Cachoeirinha
Aquifer
185,163
70
Caiuá
Aquifer
1,477,200
50
Cobertura Detrítica Indife
Aquifer
127,806
70
Cobertura Detrito-Lateriti
Aquifer
3,209,850
70
Coberturas Detrito-Laterit
Aquifer
655,319
70
Coberturas detrito-laterit
Aquifer
12,294
100
Depósitos Colúvio-Eluviais
Aquifer
1,239,400
90
Depósitos Detríticos Indif
Aquifer
26,519
70
Depósitos Eólicos Continen
Aquifer
1,047,015
80
Fazenda da Casa Branca
Aquifer
2,515,713
50
Furnas
Aquifer
1,023,988
70
Marília
Aquifer
595,888
70
Pantanal Facies Coluvionar
Aquifer
52,731
30
Pantanal Facies depósitos
Aquifer
178,775
30
Pantanal Facies Terraços A
Aquifer
310,975
30
Piauí, Grupo Balsas
Aquifer
6,245,154
70
Pirambóia
Aquifer
129,013
30
Poti, Grupo Canindé
Aquifer
2,569,356
70
Ronuro
Aquifer
272,188
70
Santo Anastácio
Aquifer
767,075
50
301
Serra Grande
Aquifer
195,888
70
Uberaba
Aquifer
20,400
70
Urucuia
Aquifer
9,562,500
70
Vale do Rio do Peixe
Aquifer
1,202,131
50
767,525
90
Alectrurus tricolor
Aves
Alipiopsitta xanthops
Aves
3,270,075
50
Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus
Aves
11,859,288
70
Anthus nattereri
Aves
238,475
100
Arremon franciscanus
Aves
219,013
100
Asthenes luizae
Aves
540,525
100
Augastes scutatus
Aves
922,519
70
Basileuterus leucophrys
Aves
1,316,444
50
Cercomacra ferdinandi
Aves
963,200
100
Charitospiza eucosma
Aves
3,674,625
30
Columbina cyanopis
Aves
224,969
100
100
Conothraupis mesoleuca
Aves
428,956
Coryphaspiza melanotis
Aves
1,094,069
90
Culicivora caudacuta
Aves
1,283,656
70
Curaeus forbesi
Aves
110,175
100
Eleothreptus candicans
Aves
233,356
100
Embernagra longicauda
Aves
671,800
70
100
Euscarthmus rufomarginatus
Aves
938,356
Geositta poeciloptera
Aves
983,819
90
Harpyhaliaetus coronatus
Aves
8,337,456
70
Herpsilochmus longirostris
Aves
2,240,631
50
Herpsilochmus pectoralis
Aves
187,644
100
Knipolegus franciscanus
Aves
532,875
100
Laterallus xenopterus
Aves
189,425
100
Lepidocolaptes wagleri
Aves
500,813
100
Melanerpes cactorum
Aves
202,619
100
Mergus octosetaceus
Aves
2,037,131
90
Mimus triurus
Aves
2,003,675
50
Nothura minor
Aves
1,293,531
80
Nyctiprogne vielliardi
Aves
111,681
100
Nystalus striatipectus
Aves
54,100
100
Paroaria baeri
Aves
1,337,700
100
Penelope jacucaca
Aves
428,763
70
Penelope ochrogaster
Aves
1,591,550
90
Pheucticus aureoventris
Aves
175,869
50
Phyllomyias reiseri
Aves
1,111,350
100
Phylloscartes roquettei
Aves
465,750
100
Polystictus pectoralis
Aves
432,338
100
Polystictus superciliaris
Aves
601,931
70
Poospiza cinerea
Aves
1,244,413
70
Porphyrospiza caerulescens
Aves
2,002,819
60
Procnias averano averano
Aves
833,219
70
Pyrrhura devillei
Aves
453,031
100
Pyrrhura pfrimeri
Aves
1,087,438
90
Scytalopus novacapitalis
Aves
1,066,400
80
Sporophila cinnamomea
Aves
356,006
100
Sporophila maximiliani
Aves
1,253,900
80
Sporophila melanogaster
Aves
339,925
100
302
Sporophila melanops
Aves
39,138
100
Suiriri islerorum
Aves
925,131
70
Synallaxis albilora
Aves
459,056
100
Syndactyla dimidiata
Aves
819,938
70
Taoniscus nanus
Aves
1,229,663
90
Thryothorus guarayanus
Aves
148,163
100
Tigrisoma fasciatum
Aves
368,694
100
Xiphocolaptes falcirostris
Aves
1,507,919
100
Chaco Umido
Unique Ecosystem
34,206
100
Florestas de Brosimum rube
Unique Ecosystem
4,925
100
Florestas de Brosimum rube
Unique Ecosystem
25,281
100
Planícies Rio das Mortes e
Unique Ecosystem
461,331
100
Vão do Paraná área A
Unique Ecosystem
400,156
100
Vão do Paraná área B
Unique Ecosystem
68,450
100
Vão do Paraná área C
Unique Ecosystem
43,381
100
Akodon lindberghi
Mammalia
29,369
100
Alouatta belzebul ululata
Mammalia
81,069
100
Alouatta guariba guariba
Mammalia
29,550
100
Aotus azarae
Mammalia
23,863
100
Artibeus anderseni
Mammalia
23,506
100
Artibeus gnomus
Mammalia
23,506
100
Blastocerus dichotomus (AR
Mammalia
2,085,888
60
Blastocerus dichotomus (PR
Mammalia
68,531
100
Blastocerus dichotomus (SF
Mammalia
23,019
60
Callithrix aurita
Mammalia
4,700
100
Callithrix flaviceps
Mammalia
37,788
100
Calomys tocantinsi
Mammalia
46,913
100
Carterodon sulcidens
Mammalia
221,925
80
Chiroderma dorie
Mammalia
51,981
100
Chironectes minimus
Mammalia
178,913
60
Chrysocyon brachyurus
Mammalia
96,820,663
30
Clyomys bishopi (nSP) - B
Mammalia
144,675
80
Clyomys bishopi (SP) - A
Mammalia
20,325
100
Cyclops didactylus
Mammalia
9,938
100
Dactilomys dactylinus
Mammalia
18,619
100
Eptesicus furinalis furina
Mammalia
25,513
100
Eumops hansae
Mammalia
4,225
100
Glyphonycteris behnii
Mammalia
24,131
100
Histiotus velatus
Mammalia
39,125
100
Inia geoffrensis
Mammalia
1,651,025
60
Juscelinomys candango
Mammalia
27,438
100
Kerodon acrobata
Mammalia
67,769
100
Kunsia fronto
Mammalia
73,331
100
Kunsia tomentosus
Mammalia
177,675
100
Leontopithecus chrysopygus
Mammalia
8,800
100
Leopardus colocolo
Mammalia
77,337,275
40
Lonchophylla bokermanni
Mammalia
113,294
100
Lonchophylla dekeyseri
Mammalia
516,581
100
Lutreolina crassicaudata
Mammalia
153,906
50
Marmosops bishopi
Mammalia
14,094
100
Microakodontomys transitor
Mammalia
44,006
100
Monodelphis americana
Mammalia
67,938
100
303
Monodelphis kunsi
Mammalia
359,644
10
Monodelphis umbistriata
Mammalia
60,738
100
Myotis simus
Mammalia
10,519
100
Myrmecophaga tridactyla
Mammalia
1,177,681
20
Natalus stramineus espirit
Mammalia
202,419
50
Oecomys cleberi
Mammalia
20,531
100
Oecomys mamorae
Mammalia
33,413
50
Oligoryzomys moojeni
Mammalia
248,919
50
Oligoryzomys rupestris
Mammalia
31,406
100
Oryzomys lamia
Mammalia
76,444
100
Oryzomys maracajuensis
Mammalia
5,800
100
Oryzomys marinhus
Mammalia
178,413
60
Oxymycterus roberti
Mammalia
117,444
100
Ozotocerus bezoarticus bez
Mammalia
449,663
60
Panthera onca
Mammalia
1,169,406
70
Priodontes maximus
Mammalia
957,788
70
Pteronura brasiliensis (Aq
Mammalia
3,719
50
Pteronura brasiliensis (Ar
Mammalia
1,065,031
60
Pteronura brasiliensis (No
Mammalia
186,944
100
Puma concolor capricornien
Mammalia
19,046,038
20
Speothos venaticus
Mammalia
160,850
80
Tapirus terrestris
Mammalia
747,925
30
Tayassu pecari
Mammalia
144,438
60
Thalpomys cerradensis
Mammalia
269,619
50
100
Thalpomys lasiotis
Mammalia
197,213
Thylamys velutinus
Mammalia
106,900
100
Thyroptera devivoi
Mammalia
58,681
100
Thyroptera discifera
Mammalia
23,150
100
Tolypeutes tricinctus
Mammalia
339,456
100
Vampyrum spectrum
Mammalia
62,281
100
Pisces
32,406
100
Ancistrus formoso
Pisces
16,113
100
Brycon orbignyanus
Pisces
13,550
100
Characidium lagosantensis
Pisces
186,925
100
Cynolebias griseus
Pisces
11,894
100
Eigenmannia vicentespelaea
Pisces
28,050
100
Maratecoara formosa
Pisces
19,275
100
Phallotorynus jucundus
Pisces
11,431
100
Plesiolebias xavantei
Pisces
48,063
100
Rhamdiopsis microcephala
Pisces
34,638
100
Simpsonichthys alternatus
Pisces
11,163
100
Simpsonichthys auratus
Pisces
4,144
100
Simpsonichthys boitonei
Pisces
26,806
100
Simpsonichthys flammeus
Pisces
61,163
100
Simpsonichthys hellneri
Pisces
12,006
100
Simpsonichthys marginatus
Pisces
15,331
100
Simpsonichthys multiradiat
Pisces
20,506
100
Simpsonichthys notatus
Pisces
37,213
100
Simpsonichthys parallelus
Pisces
39,475
100
Simpsonichthys rufus
Pisces
8,475
100
Simpsonichthys santanae
Pisces
9,106
100
Simpsonichthys similis
Pisces
11,619
100
Aguarunichthys tocantinsen
304
Simpsonichthys stellatus
Pisces
12,006
100
Simpsonichthys trilineatus
Pisces
11,163
100
Simpsonichthys zonatus
Pisces
14,819
100
Spectrolebias semiocellatu
Pisces
11,406
100
Steindachneridion scripta
Pisces
24,206
100
Sternarchorhynchus britski
Pisces
2,538
100
Stygichthys typhlops
Pisces
4,331
100
Trichomycterus itacarambie
Pisces
16,838
100
Acrocomia hassleri
Plantae
68,550
100
Agalinis angustifolia
Plantae
103,713
100
Alstroemeria apertiflora
Plantae
16,800
100
Alstroemeria brasiliensis
Plantae
29,075
100
Alstroemeria orchidioides
Plantae
28,506
100
Alstroemeria pedunliflora
Plantae
26,550
100
Anemopaegma patelliforme
Plantae
8,513
100
Anthurium minarum
Plantae
347,413
50
Aspilia almasensis
Plantae
22,531
100
Asterostigma cryptostylum
Plantae
107,263
70
Astronium urundeuva
Plantae
50,856
100
Attalea barreirensis
Plantae
120,881
100
Attalea brasiliensis
Plantae
46,725
100
100
Baccharis elliptica
Plantae
98,294
Baccharis polyphylla
Plantae
28,025
70
Banisteriopsis amplectens
Plantae
12,800
100
Banisteriopsis andersonii
Plantae
150,788
70
Banisteriopsis cipoensis
Plantae
85,081
100
Banisteriopsis hirsuta
Plantae
58,581
100
Banisteriopsis virgultosa
Plantae
41,538
100
Bernardia crassifolia
Plantae
125,513
100
Bernardia similis
Plantae
141,550
70
Billbergia brachysiphon
Plantae
8,413
100
Billbergia kuhlmanni
Plantae
3,725
100
Billbergia macrocalyx
Plantae
9,144
100
Bromelia goyazensis
Plantae
64,231
100
Bromelia horstii
Plantae
14,300
100
Bromelia irwinii
Plantae
54,613
100
Bromelia macedoi
Plantae
150,025
70
Bromelia reversacantha
Plantae
11,688
100
Butia campicola
Plantae
30,788
100
Butia leiospatha
Plantae
5,131
100
Butia purpurascens
Plantae
16,213
100
Byrsonima cipoensis
Plantae
29,531
100
Byrsonima fonsecae
Plantae
21,000
100
Byrsonima hatschbachii
Plantae
22,388
100
Byrsonima macrophylla
Plantae
29,013
100
Byrsonima onishiana
Plantae
2,338
100
Calea abbreviata
Plantae
73,925
100
Camarea axillaris
Plantae
146,894
70
Camarea hirsuta
Plantae
63,456
100
Cambedessia atropurpurea
Plantae
29,363
100
Cambedessia glaziovii
Plantae
29,750
100
Canistropsis selloana
Plantae
82,056
100
305
Castelnavia lindmaniana
Plantae
23,294
100
Cattleya nobilior
Plantae
206,306
50
Cattleya walkeriana
Plantae
205,181
50
Cereus mirabella
Plantae
25,881
100
Chamaecrista aristata
Plantae
24,944
100
Chamaecrista stillifera
Plantae
38,669
100
Chamaecrista ulmea
Plantae
24,156
100
Cipocereus crassisepalus
Plantae
24,888
100
Cissus inundata
Plantae
7,256
100
Cryptanthus dianae
Plantae
2,375
100
Cryptanthus warasii
Plantae
27,981
100
Cuphea cipoensis
Plantae
64,106
100
Cuphea cuiabensis
Plantae
70,025
100
Cuphea rubro-virens
Plantae
41,981
100
Cuphea teleandra
Plantae
46,019
100
Cyrtocarpa caatingae
Plantae
67,394
100
Cyrtopodium aliciae
Plantae
44,969
100
Cyrtopodium braemii
Plantae
240,388
70
Cyrtopodium caiapoense
Plantae
89,175
70
Cyrtopodium dusenii
Plantae
66,169
70
Cyrtopodium latifolium
Plantae
35,294
70
Cyrtopodium linearifolium
Plantae
110,519
100
Cyrtopodium lissochiloides
Plantae
71,825
100
Cyrtopodium poecilum
Plantae
236,819
50
100
Dimerostemma annuum
Plantae
10,231
Diplusodon aggregatifolius
Plantae
83,088
70
Diplusodon ericoides
Plantae
37,325
100
Diplusodon glaziovii
Plantae
84,875
100
Diplusodon gracilis
Plantae
53,331
100
Diplusodon hatschbachii
Plantae
28,194
100
Diplusodon kielmeyroides
Plantae
38,406
100
Diplusodon minasensis
Plantae
29,494
100
Diplusodon panniculatus
Plantae
65,069
70
Diplusodon retroimbricatus
Plantae
53,481
100
Diplusodon vidalii
Plantae
4,594
100
Discocactus catingicola
Plantae
25,519
100
Discocactus placentiformis
Plantae
28,438
100
Ditassa auriflora
Plantae
29,825
100
Ditassa cordeiroana
Plantae
72,688
100
Ditassa grazilae
Plantae
29,725
100
Ditassa inconspicua
Plantae
51,563
100
Ditassa laevis
Plantae
14,969
100
Ditassa refractifolia
Plantae
60,131
100
Ditassa semirii
Plantae
29,588
100
Drosera graomogolensis
Plantae
53,469
100
Dyckia aurea
Plantae
58,975
100
Dyckia biflora
Plantae
29,475
100
Dyckia braunii
Plantae
55,900
100
Dyckia coximensis
Plantae
17,681
100
Dyckia dawsonii
Plantae
30,081
100
Dyckia densiflora
Plantae
8,975
100
Dyckia eminens
Plantae
26,263
100
306
Dyckia estevesii
Plantae
17,044
100
Dyckia exerta
Plantae
7,450
100
Dyckia goiana
Plantae
17,419
100
Dyckia granmogulensis
Plantae
25,113
100
Dyckia lindevaldae
Plantae
28,213
100
Dyckia machrisiana
Plantae
136,419
70
Dyckia macropoda
Plantae
27,981
100
Dyckia microcalyx
Plantae
3,725
100
Dyckia pauciflora
Plantae
22,013
100
Dyckia pumila
Plantae
19,488
100
Dyckia rariflora
Plantae
204,375
70
Dyckia simulans
Plantae
8,975
100
Dyckia sordida
Plantae
130,525
100
Dyckia spinulosa
Plantae
12,331
100
Dyckia stenophylla
Plantae
20,800
100
Dyckia uleana
Plantae
24,669
100
Dyckia ursina
Plantae
172,119
50
Encholirium bradeanum
Plantae
27,981
100
Encholirium heloisae
Plantae
211,694
50
Encholirium irwinii
Plantae
69,456
70
Encholirium luxor
Plantae
106,844
70
Encholirium lymanianum
Plantae
10,919
100
Encholirium magalhaesii
Plantae
46,081
100
Encholirium patens
Plantae
26,831
100
Encholirium pedicellatum
Plantae
133,463
70
Encholirium piresianaum
Plantae
40,419
100
Encholirium reflexum
Plantae
74,919
100
Encholirium saziam
Plantae
28,269
100
Encholirium scrutor
Plantae
83,694
100
Encholirium suzannae
Plantae
27,981
100
Encholirium vogelii
Plantae
28,269
100
100
Eremanthus argenteus
Plantae
55,119
Eriope crassipes
Plantae
157,531
50
Eriope simplex
Plantae
13,000
100
Euphorbia crossadenia
Plantae
30,425
100
Euterpe edulis
Plantae
95,656
70
Evolvulus rariflorus
Plantae
28,950
100
Froelichiella grisea
Plantae
118,781
70
Gaylussacia retusa
Plantae
25,019
100
Gearum brasiliense
Plantae
247,631
70
Goyazia petrea
Plantae
26,156
100
Griffinia nocturna
Plantae
26,619
100
Gymnopogon doelii
Plantae
8,388
100
Habenaria itacolumia
Plantae
28,725
100
Harpalyce parvifolia
Plantae
64,700
100
Heteropterys aliciae
Plantae
14,900
100
Hippeastrum goianum
Plantae
96,588
70
Hypenia aristulata
Plantae
79,475
70
Hypenia micrantha
Plantae
25,744
100
Hypenia subrosea
Plantae
59,938
100
Hyptis angustifolia
Plantae
19,556
100
Hyptis bombycina
Plantae
13,100
100
307
Hyptis cruciformis
Plantae
141,925
70
Hyptis frondosa
Plantae
58,925
100
100
Hyptis hamatidens
Plantae
19,656
Hyptis pachyphylla
Plantae
216,250
50
Hyptis penaeoides
Plantae
25,938
100
Hyptis stachydifolia
Plantae
38,969
100
Hyptis tagetifolia
Plantae
29,856
100
Ichthyothere connata
Plantae
86,900
100
Ichthyothere elliptica
Plantae
21,581
100
Jacaranda intricata
Plantae
44,700
100
Jacaranda micrantha
Plantae
5,113
100
Jacaranda mimosifolia
Plantae
27,731
100
Jacaranda oxyphylla
Plantae
129,556
70
Jacaranda paucifoliolata
Plantae
343,869
50
Jacaranda praetermissa
Plantae
398,525
50
Jacaranda racemosa
Plantae
223,063
70
Lagenocarpus bracteosus
Plantae
86,969
100
Lavoisiera quinquenervis
Plantae
6,931
100
Leandra adenothrix
Plantae
14,200
100
Lippia diamantinensis
Plantae
28,681
100
Lippia rhodocnemis
Plantae
21,325
100
Lychnophora ericoides
Plantae
309,200
30
Lychnophora markgravii
Plantae
33,963
100
Miconia elegans
Plantae
332,994
30
Miconia flavescens
Plantae
28,288
100
Miconia mattogrossensis
Plantae
19,344
100
Miconia nambyquarae
Plantae
13,369
100
Microlicia amplexicaulis
Plantae
73,063
100
Microlicia decipiens
Plantae
28,894
100
Microlicia ericoides
Plantae
28,231
100
Microlicia juniperina
Plantae
58,138
100
100
Microlicia macedoi
Plantae
21,631
Microlicia psammophila
Plantae
144,550
70
Mikania alvimii
Plantae
59,125
100
Mimosa accedens
Plantae
97,138
50
Mimosa acroconica
Plantae
13,125
100
Mimosa adamantina
Plantae
50,531
100
100
Mimosa adenotricha
Plantae
29,413
Mimosa albolanata
Plantae
338,313
30
Mimosa amnis-atri
Plantae
29,450
100
Mimosa antrorsa
Plantae
45,488
100
Mimosa apodocarpa
Plantae
22,844
100
Mimosa auriberbis
Plantae
18,044
100
100
Mimosa barretoi
Plantae
81,050
Mimosa brachycarpa
Plantae
174,869
50
Mimosa brevipes
Plantae
4,838
100
Mimosa burchellii
Plantae
27,806
100
Mimosa caliciadenia
Plantae
29,706
100
Mimosa callithrix
Plantae
17,119
100
Mimosa calocephala
Plantae
29,413
100
Mimosa capito
Plantae
30,063
100
Mimosa claussenii
Plantae
1,056,019
30
308
Mimosa coruscocaesia
Plantae
51,081
100
Mimosa cryptothamnos
Plantae
56,425
100
Mimosa cyclophylla
Plantae
186,050
70
Mimosa cylindracea
Plantae
55,719
100
Mimosa decorticans
Plantae
35,563
100
Mimosa densa
Plantae
187,888
70
Mimosa dicerastes
Plantae
60,706
100
Mimosa dichroa
Plantae
242,731
50
Mimosa digitata
Plantae
37,494
100
Mimosa diptera
Plantae
11,081
100
Mimosa discobola
Plantae
90,781
100
100
Mimosa dominarum
Plantae
55,800
Mimosa echinocaula
Plantae
107,688
70
Mimosa eriorrhachis
Plantae
41,956
100
Mimosa falcipinna
Plantae
75,581
70
Mimosa flavocaesia
Plantae
56,425
100
Mimosa foliolosa
Plantae
773,894
30
Mimosa hapaloclada
Plantae
39,925
100
Mimosa hebecarpa
Plantae
59,825
70
Mimosa heringeri
Plantae
147,988
50
Mimosa humivagans
Plantae
28,356
100
Mimosa hypnodes
Plantae
58,694
100
Mimosa hypoglauca
Plantae
226,825
50
Mimosa interrupta
Plantae
101,525
70
Mimosa laniceps
Plantae
77,106
100
Mimosa lanuginosa
Plantae
227,463
30
Mimosa laticifera
Plantae
180,125
30
100
Mimosa leprosa
Plantae
76,606
Mimosa lithoreas
Plantae
12,250
100
Mimosa longepedunculata
Plantae
104,988
100
Mimosa macedoana
Plantae
81,825
100
Mimosa macrocephala
Plantae
98,369
100
Mimosa maguirei
Plantae
49,281
100
Mimosa manidea
Plantae
153,213
70
Mimosa melanocarpa
Plantae
102,681
70
Mimosa minarum
Plantae
48,194
100
Mimosa nitens
Plantae
167,744
50
Mimosa nycteridis
Plantae
14,906
100
Mimosa oedoclada
Plantae
135,400
70
Mimosa papposa
Plantae
10,119
100
Mimosa parviceps
Plantae
50,888
100
Mimosa paucifolia
Plantae
38,188
100
Mimosa petiolaris
Plantae
113,769
70
Mimosa phyllodinea
Plantae
55,681
100
Mimosa piptoptera
Plantae
372,706
50
Mimosa pithecolobioides
Plantae
166,013
70
Mimosa poculata
Plantae
61,450
100
100
Mimosa pogocephala
Plantae
47,194
Mimosa polycephala
Plantae
359,169
50
Mimosa procurrens
Plantae
71,069
100
Mimosa prorepens
Plantae
41,956
100
Mimosa pseudofoliolosa
Plantae
6,244
100
309
Mimosa pseudoradula
Plantae
379,394
30
Mimosa pteridifolia
Plantae
561,375
30
Mimosa pumilio
Plantae
16,775
100
Mimosa pyrenea
Plantae
100,238
70
Mimosa radula
Plantae
671,238
30
Mimosa rava
Plantae
18,044
100
Mimosa regina
Plantae
60,531
100
Mimosa rheiptera
Plantae
28,344
100
Mimosa rhodostegia
Plantae
45,131
100
Mimosa rufipila
Plantae
46,650
100
Mimosa sericantha
Plantae
399,413
50
Mimosa setifera
Plantae
22,081
100
Mimosa setosissima
Plantae
30,938
100
Mimosa somnambulans
Plantae
29,544
100
Mimosa speciosissima
Plantae
170,100
70
Mimosa stylosa
Plantae
29,419
100
Mimosa suburbana
Plantae
30,713
100
Mimosa supravisa
Plantae
120,463
70
Mimosa thermarum
Plantae
23,063
100
Mimosa ulei
Plantae
89,231
70
Mimosa uniceps
Plantae
29,419
100
Mimosa venatorum
Plantae
173,556
70
Mimosa verecunda
Plantae
89,125
100
Mimosa vestita
Plantae
64,081
100
Mimosa virgula
Plantae
38,181
100
Mimosa xavantinae
Plantae
117,525
70
Minasia alpestris
Plantae
113,863
100
Moquinia racemosa
Plantae
162,819
70
Ophiochloa hydrolithica
Plantae
76,650
100
Orthophytum humile
Plantae
35,506
100
Orthophytum mello-barretoi
Plantae
225,606
70
Orthophytum supthutii
Plantae
30,019
100
Oryctina scabrida
Plantae
30,463
100
Ossaea warmingiana
Plantae
6,994
100
Ouratea hatschbachii
Plantae
29,144
100
Oxalis diamantinae
Plantae
24,025
100
Paepalanthus ater
Plantae
62,825
100
Paepalanthus extremensis
Plantae
87,544
100
Paspalum biaristatum
Plantae
21,631
100
Paspalum longiaristatum
Plantae
65,456
100
Paspalum niquelandiae
Plantae
29,950
100
Pavonia grazielae
Plantae
55,044
100
Peixotoa axillaris
Plantae
12,356
100
Peixotoa bahiana
Plantae
22,488
100
Peixotoa barnebyi
Plantae
28,700
100
Peixotoa glabra
Plantae
118,419
100
Peixotoa irwinii
Plantae
27,600
100
Peixotoa octoflora
Plantae
20,113
100
Peixotoa psilophylla
Plantae
64,156
100
Pepinia cristalinensis
Plantae
20,819
100
Pepinia ensifolia
Plantae
14,313
100
Philodendron flumineum
Plantae
192,181
50
310
Philodendron guaraense
Plantae
65,063
100
Philodendron mayoi
Plantae
256,650
50
Phoradendron apiciflorum
Plantae
6,950
100
Phoradendron irwinii
Plantae
28,913
100
Phoradendron minor
Plantae
3,469
100
Phoradendron pinheirense
Plantae
22,356
100
Phoradendron triplinervium
Plantae
29,900
100
Phragmipedium vittatum
Plantae
323,769
50
Physocalymma scaberrimum
Plantae
788,863
30
Pilocarpus microphyllus
Plantae
30,788
100
Pilocarpus trachylophus
Plantae
113,244
100
Pitcairnia bradei
Plantae
54,600
100
Pitcairnia irwiniana
Plantae
60,969
100
Planaltoa lychnophoroides
Plantae
115,688
70
Polygala franchetii
Plantae
50,206
100
Proteopsis argentea
Plantae
370,444
30
Rhynchospora warmingii
Plantae
74,469
100
Richterago arenaria
Plantae
86,844
100
Richterago caulescens
Plantae
29,300
100
Richterago elegans
Plantae
29,188
100
Richterago polyphylla
Plantae
57,513
100
Richterago riparia
Plantae
29,300
100
Rourea pseudospadicea
Plantae
1,819
100
Schinopsis brasiliensis
Plantae
295,913
50
Simaba warmingiana
Plantae
27,288
100
Solanum alternato-pinatum
Plantae
25,188
100
Solanum bullatum
Plantae
21,444
100
Solanum cernum
Plantae
53,369
100
Solanum cladotrichum
Plantae
110,763
100
Solanum incarceratum
Plantae
209,150
50
Solanum oocarpum
Plantae
85,963
70
Spigelia aceifolia
Plantae
116,544
100
Spigelia sellowiana
Plantae
182,669
70
Stachytarpheta procumbens
Plantae
29,481
100
Stigmaphyllon macedoanum
Plantae
3,063
100
Struthanthus cerradensis
Plantae
20,713
100
Struthanthus planaltinae
Plantae
34,006
100
Struthanthus pusillifolius
Plantae
18,813
100
Struthanthus savannae
Plantae
8,550
100
Symplocos rhamnifolia
Plantae
67,013
70
100
Syngonanthus elegans
Plantae
80,238
Syngonanthus vernonioides
Plantae
141,075
70
Tabebuia bureavii
Plantae
52,494
100
Tabebuia chrysotricha
Plantae
39,294
70
Tabebuia pumila
Plantae
139,631
70
Tabebuia umbellata
Plantae
39,400
70
Tabebuia vellosoi
Plantae
28,763
100
Talisia subalbens
Plantae
36,038
100
Thelyschista ghillanyi
Plantae
29,325
100
Thryallis parviflora
Plantae
37,650
100
Tibouchina papyrus
Plantae
26,581
70
Tillandsia barrosoae
Plantae
4,356
100
311
Tillandsia copynii
Plantae
21,413
100
Tillandsia kurt-horstii
Plantae
24,994
100
Trembleya hatschbachii
Plantae
29,131
100
Trimezia brevicaulis
Plantae
29,294
100
Trimezia exillima
Plantae
86,181
100
Uebelmannia gummifera
Plantae
24,844
100
Vellozia barbata
Plantae
28,688
100
Vellozia sessilis
Plantae
29,031
100
Vernonia adenophylla
Plantae
56,731
100
Vernonia almedae
Plantae
59,113
70
Vernonia alpestris
Plantae
60,206
100
Vernonia angulata
Plantae
68,169
100
Vernonia argentea
Plantae
3,350
100
Vernonia asteriflora
Plantae
2,975
100
Vernonia bishopii
Plantae
107,319
100
100
Vernonia caiapoensis
Plantae
39,481
Vernonia chamaepeuces
Plantae
108,150
70
Vernonia chamissonis
Plantae
4,588
100
Vernonia crassa
Plantae
5,619
100
Vernonia cristalinae
Plantae
99,731
100
Vernonia cuiabensis
Plantae
24,025
100
Vernonia diffusa
Plantae
48,213
100
Vernonia echinocephala
Plantae
126,744
70
Vernonia eitenii
Plantae
285,425
30
Vernonia elsieae
Plantae
16,256
100
Vernonia floccosa
Plantae
253,081
50
Vernonia foliosa
Plantae
101,756
70
Vernonia fonsecae
Plantae
103,094
100
Vernonia glazioviana
Plantae
963
100
Vernonia goiazensis
Plantae
27,756
100
Vernonia grearii
Plantae
110,438
100
Vernonia hatschbachii
Plantae
82,394
100
Vernonia heringeri
Plantae
25,950
100
Vernonia hoveaefolia
Plantae
207,863
50
Vernonia irwinii
Plantae
126,669
50
Vernonia lanuginosa
Plantae
13,113
100
Vernonia laxa
Plantae
28,863
100
Vernonia lilacina
Plantae
222,481
50
Vernonia lindbergii
Plantae
27,738
100
Vernonia linearifolia
Plantae
176,481
70
Vernonia mansoana
Plantae
168,694
50
Vernonia mariana
Plantae
298,844
50
Vernonia mucronulata
Plantae
27,444
70
Vernonia myrsinites
Plantae
217,538
50
Vernonia oligolepis
Plantae
13,419
100
Vernonia pannosa
Plantae
184,631
30
Vernonia pedunculata
Plantae
57,319
100
Vernonia petiolaris
Plantae
5,725
100
Vernonia pseudaurea
Plantae
30,781
100
Vernonia psilostachya
Plantae
65,394
70
Vernonia pungens
Plantae
63,238
100
Vernonia pycnostachya
Plantae
174,125
70
312
Vernonia quinqueflora
Plantae
2,469
100
Vernonia radula
Plantae
7,863
100
Vernonia rosea
Plantae
62,925
100
Vernonia santosii
Plantae
58,331
100
Vernonia scapigera
Plantae
119,750
100
Vernonia scaposa
Plantae
28,613
100
Vernonia secunda
Plantae
90,600
70
Vernonia sessilifolia
Plantae
63,500
100
100
Vernonia soderstroemii
Plantae
79,456
Vernonia souzae
Plantae
199,119
50
Vernonia spixiana
Plantae
79,669
100
Vernonia stoechas
Plantae
259,125
70
Vernonia stricta
Plantae
114,138
70
Vernonia subverticillata
Plantae
51,594
100
Vernonia velutina
Plantae
28,763
100
Vernonia vepretorum
Plantae
166,113
70
Vernonia viscidula
Plantae
89,138
70
Vernonia xanthophylla
Plantae
127,356
100
Viguiera aspilioides
Plantae
50,125
100
Viguiera filifolia
Plantae
38,163
100
Viguiera hispida
Plantae
25,231
100
Viguiera linearifolia
Plantae
37,919
100
Vriesea atropurpurea
Plantae
108,750
100
Vriesea citrina
Plantae
9,006
100
Vriesea clausseniana
Plantae
28,956
100
Vriesea diamantinensis
Plantae
93,450
100
Vriesea monacorum
Plantae
27,975
100
Vriesea nanuzae
Plantae
28,456
100
Vriesea segadas-viannae
Plantae
37,463
100
Vriesea simulans
Plantae
29,463
100
Vriesea stricta
Plantae
160,244
70
Wunderlichia crulsiana
Plantae
101,288
100
Wunderlichia senaeii
Plantae
29,738
100
Xyris lutescens
Plantae
51,731
100
Xyris nigricans
Plantae
29,481
100
Alto São Francisco
Ecosystem Process
8,991
90
Nascentes do Rio Tapajós
Ecosystem Process
201,942
90
Nascentes do Rio Xingu
Ecosystem Process
256,536
90
Nascentes em Terra Ronca
Ecosystem Process
5,364
100
Rio Araguaia
Ecosystem Process
6,638,958
85
Rio Cabacal
Ecosystem Process
3,582
100
Rio Cipó
Ecosystem Process
56,439
90
Rio Corrente
Ecosystem Process
36,414
90
Rio das Velhas
Ecosystem Process
69,651
90
Rio Formoso
Ecosystem Process
6,444
100
Rio Grande
Ecosystem Process
177,543
90
Rio Jubinha
Ecosystem Process
5,283
100
Rio Miranda
Ecosystem Process
75,555
90
Rio Negro
Ecosystem Process
6,777
100
Rio Paranaíba
Ecosystem Process
32,967
90
Rio Quebra-anzol
Ecosystem Process
18,036
100
Rio Reruaçu
Ecosystem Process
6,453
100
313
Rio Sepotuba
Ecosystem Process
7,425
100
Sobradinho até Três Marias
Ecosystem Process
842,247
90
Veredas do São Marcos
Ecosystem Process
28,188
90
Acanthochelis macrocephala
Reptilia
223,319
30
Amphisbaena anaemariae
Reptilia
3,046,750
20
Amphisbaena camura
Reptilia
407,319
30
Amphisbaena cf neglecta
Reptilia
55,575
100
Amphisbaena crisae
Reptilia
121,831
100
100
Amphisbaena ibijara
Reptilia
121,013
Amphisbaena mensae
Reptilia
4,543,656
30
Amphisbaena miringoera
Reptilia
112,019
100
Amphisbaena neglecta
Reptilia
97,131
100
Amphisbaena sanctaeritae
Reptilia
11,969
100
Amphisbaena sp
Reptilia
86,356
100
Amphisbaena talisiae
Reptilia
57,156
100
Anolis chrysolepis
Reptilia
55,580,306
30
Anolis meridionalis A
Reptilia
64,713,550
30
Anops bilabialatus
Reptilia
39,431
100
Apostolepis albicollaris
Reptilia
3,622,738
50
Apostolepis ammodytes
Reptilia
25,084,863
20
Apostolepis assimilis
Reptilia
24,731,469
10
Apostolepis cerradoensis
Reptilia
70,350
100
Apostolepis christineae
Reptilia
93,581
100
Apostolepis dimidiata
Reptilia
3,517,594
50
Apostolepis flavotorquata
Reptilia
3,505,131
30
Apostolepis goiasensis
Reptilia
1,321,194
70
Apostolepis intermedia
Reptilia
27,219
100
Apostolepis lineatus
Reptilia
97,275
100
Apostolepis longicaudata
Reptilia
6,374,263
50
Apostolepis polylepis
Reptilia
5,459,525
50
Apostolepis vittata
Reptilia
889,656
50
Atractus pantostictus A
Reptilia
4,275,581
20
Atractus pantostictus SP B
Reptilia
244,931
30
Bachia bresslaui
Reptilia
3,891,125
70
Bachia cacerensis
Reptilia
89,500
100
Bachia sp 1 A
Reptilia
55,569
100
Bachia sp 2 B
Reptilia
51,050
100
Bothrops itapetiningae A
Reptilia
1,978,694
70
Bothrops itapetiningae SP
Reptilia
1,206,019
50
Bothrops lutzi
Reptilia
36,751,925
30
Bothrops mattogrossensis
Reptilia
3,918,725
10
Bothrops neuwiedi
Reptilia
2,970,881
30
Bothrops pauloensis
Reptilia
33,405,175
10
Bothrops sp
Reptilia
24,878,413
10
Bronia bedai
Reptilia
54,075
100
Bronia kraoh
Reptilia
278,081
100
Bronia saxosa
Reptilia
55,569
100
Cercolophia absaberi
Reptilia
5,063
100
Cercolophia cuiabana
Reptilia
121,356
100
Cercolophia steindachneri
Reptilia
5,431
100
Chironius flavolineatus
Reptilia
77,204,988
10
Chironius quadricarinatus
Reptilia
63,311,881
10
314
Clelia bicolor
Reptilia
1,425,075
10
Clelia quimi
Reptilia
1,184,594
30
Cnemidophorus cf parecis
Reptilia
232,881
100
Cnemidophorus mumbuca
Reptilia
122,419
100
Cnemidophorus sp
Reptilia
240,344
70
Coleodactylus brachystoma
Reptilia
4,088,069
20
Coleodactylus cf brachysto
Reptilia
117,988
100
Dracaena paraguayensis
Reptilia
884,325
30
Drymoluber brazili
Reptilia
4,965,256
10
Enyalius cf bilineatus
Reptilia
49,781
100
Epicrates cenchria crassus
Reptilia
10,835,225
10
Eunectes notaeus
Reptilia
1,001,344
20
Eurolophosaurus nanuzae
Reptilia
954,881
50
Gymnodactylus carvalhoi
Reptilia
115,719
100
Gymnodactylus guttulatus
Reptilia
151,831
100
Helicops gomesi
Reptilia
1,878,388
50
Helicops modestus
Reptilia
1,071,444
10
Heterodactylus lundii
Reptilia
293,706
100
Hoplocercus spinosus
Reptilia
63,469,113
30
Hydrops caesurus
Reptilia
193,725
70
Kentropyx cf paulensis
Reptilia
122,356
100
Kentropyx paulensis
Reptilia
4,544,294
20
Kentropyx vanzoi
Reptilia
3,198,325
20
Leptotyphlops brasiliensis
Reptilia
17,271,256
50
Leptotyphlops koppesi
Reptilia
4,800,588
20
Liophis frenatus
Reptilia
2,307,044
30
Liophis maryellenae
Reptilia
3,797,525
20
Liophis meridionalis
Reptilia
8,700,888
10
Liophis paucidens
Reptilia
9,636,819
20
Liotyphlops schubarti
Reptilia
1,406
100
Lygodactylus wetzeli
Reptilia
11,794
100
Lystrophis matogrossensis
Reptilia
1,681,219
30
Lystrophis nattereri A
Reptilia
3,924,131
20
Lystrophis nattereri SP B
Reptilia
337,013
70
Mabuya guaporicola
Reptilia
5,042,419
20
Mesoclemys vanderhaegei
Reptilia
2,036,088
10
Micrablepharus atticolus
Reptilia
40,681,300
10
Micrurus brasiliensis
Reptilia
18,004,081
30
Micrurus tricolor
Reptilia
845,331
20
Ophiodes sp
Reptilia
6,263,469
10
Oxyrhopus rhombifer rhombi
Reptilia
5,518,788
10
Oxyrhopus rhombifer septen
Reptilia
30,235,769
10
Oxyrhopus rhombifer W
Reptilia
1,298,263
10
Pantodactylus albostrigatu
Reptilia
5,444,694
10
Phalotris concolor
Reptilia
103,775
100
Phalotris labiomaculatus
Reptilia
9,293,175
30
Phalotris lativittatus
Reptilia
978,925
50
Phalotris matogrossensis
Reptilia
429,006
30
Phalotris mertensi
Reptilia
3,047,175
50
Phalotris multipunctatus
Reptilia
29,769
100
Phalotris nasutus
Reptilia
3,467,013
20
Philodryas livida
Reptilia
236,563
80
315
Philodryas mattogrossensis
Reptilia
12,077,481
80
Philodryas psammophidea
Reptilia
1,345,425
80
Phimophis guerini
Reptilia
97,134,019
10
Phimophis iglesiasi
Reptilia
4,075,631
20
Placosoma cipoense
Reptilia
169,950
100
Podocnemis unifilis
Reptilia
3,182,425
30
Psilophthalmus sp
Reptilia
152,088
100
Psomophis genimaculatus
Reptilia
746,594
10
Rhachidelus brazili
Reptilia
13,823,013
50
Rhachisaurus brachylepis
Reptilia
254,725
100
Simophis rhinostoma
Reptilia
26,366,238
20
Stenocercus caducus
Reptilia
436,169
100
Stenocercus cf dumerilii
Reptilia
503,325
100
Stenocercus cf tricristatu
Reptilia
112,381
100
Stenocercus sinesaccus
Reptilia
73,331
100
Tantilla boipiranga
Reptilia
113,056
100
Thamnodynastes chaquensis
Reptilia
1,136,531
10
Thamnodynastes rutilus
Reptilia
796,188
30
Trachemis adiutrix
Reptilia
103,525
100
Tropidurus cf itambere A
Reptilia
3,927,006
50
Tropidurus cf itambere B
Reptilia
6,787,244
50
Tropidurus cf montanus
Reptilia
3,699,306
50
Tropidurus guarani
Reptilia
4,094,306
30
Tupinambis duseni
Reptilia
3,434,938
70
Tupinambis quadrilineatus
Reptilia
9,096,563
10
Xenopholis sp
Reptilia
326,500
10
Landscape Unit
580,800
50
Floresta seca, morros
Landscape Unit
315,706
50
Floresta seca, morros
Landscape Unit
552,213
50
Floresta seca, morros
Landscape Unit
1,847,413
50
Florestas secas, planicie
Landscape Unit
2,222,213
60
Florestas secas, planicie
Landscape Unit
11,404,013
60
Florestas secas, planicie
Landscape Unit
12,406,844
60
Florestas secas, planicie
Landscape Unit
546,850
30
Florestas secas, planicie
Landscape Unit
612,281
60
Outras florestas, planicie
Landscape Unit
302,919
55
Outras florestas, planicie
Landscape Unit
179,969
55
Outras florestas, planicie
Landscape Unit
84,769
55
Outras florestas, planicie
Landscape Unit
1,345,169
55
Outras florestas, planicie
Landscape Unit
388,875
55
Outras florestas, planicie
Landscape Unit
899,181
55
Outras florestas, planicie
Landscape Unit
717,431
55
Outras florestas, planicie
Landscape Unit
51,444
55
Outras florestas, terras p
Landscape Unit
106,556
40
Outras florestas, terras p
Landscape Unit
5,354,313
40
Outras florestas, terras p
Landscape Unit
553,656
40
Outras florestas, terras p
Landscape Unit
16,700
40
Savana (campos), morros
Landscape Unit
2,067,319
50
Savana (campos), morros
Landscape Unit
403,725
50
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
199,544
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
3,956,925
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
83,431
30
Floresta seca, morros
316
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
403,081
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
4,107,613
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
1,183,113
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
163,219
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
1,181,213
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
211,688
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
1,699,119
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
395,906
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
1,067,706
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
3,641,781
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
3,065,738
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
152,469
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
787,388
30
Savana (campos), planicies
Landscape Unit
417,863
30
Savana (floresta), planici
Landscape Unit
1,679,356
55
Savana (floresta), planici
Landscape Unit
484,669
55
Savana (floresta), planici
Landscape Unit
236,088
55
Savana (floresta), planici
Landscape Unit
441,363
55
Savana densa, morros
Landscape Unit
169,175
45
Savana densa, morros
Landscape Unit
1,730,581
45
Savana densa, morros
Landscape Unit
896,200
45
Savana densa, morros
Landscape Unit
234,944
45
Savana densa, morros
Landscape Unit
205,969
45
Savana densa, morros
Landscape Unit
1,969,125
45
Savana densa, morros
Landscape Unit
509,131
45
Savana densa, morros
Landscape Unit
256,275
45
Savana densa, planicies
Landscape Unit
724,388
35
Savana densa, planicies
Landscape Unit
1,378,319
35
Savana densa, planicies
Landscape Unit
1,130,213
35
Savana densa, planicies
Landscape Unit
1,351,519
35
Savana densa, planicies
Landscape Unit
309,569
35
Savana densa, planicies
Landscape Unit
1,099,700
35
Savana densa, planicies
Landscape Unit
2,040,869
35
Savana densa, planicies
Landscape Unit
523,844
35
Savana densa, planicies
Landscape Unit
225,031
35
Savana densa, planicies
Landscape Unit
123,775
35
Savana densa, planicies
Landscape Unit
1,732,631
35
Savana, planicies
Landscape Unit
265,644
40
Savana, planicies
Landscape Unit
1,546,669
40
Savana, planicies
Landscape Unit
1,426,556
40
Savana, planicies
Landscape Unit
144,519
40
Savana, planicies
Landscape Unit
183,975
40
Savana, planicies
Landscape Unit
1,104,600
40
Savana, planicies
Landscape Unit
493,794
40
Savana, planicies
Landscape Unit
599,456
40
Savana, planicies
Landscape Unit
216,088
40
Savana, planicies
Landscape Unit
425,306
40
Savana, planicies
Landscape Unit
304,094
40
Savana, planicies
Landscape Unit
664,719
40
Savana, planicies
Landscape Unit
980,181
40
Savana, terras altas
Landscape Unit
98,538
35
Savana, terras altas
Landscape Unit
1,240,750
35
317
Savana, terras altas
Landscape Unit
1,241,925
35
Savana, terras altas
Landscape Unit
3,209,638
35
Savana, terras altas
Landscape Unit
677,194
35
Savana, terras altas
Landscape Unit
1,546,556
35
Savana, terras altas
Landscape Unit
284,744
35
Savana, terras altas
Landscape Unit
2,963,125
35
SDFS (savana densa) planic
Landscape Unit
951,213
55
SDFS (savana densa) planic
Landscape Unit
56,363
55
SDFS (savana densa) planic
Landscape Unit
133,350
55
SDFS (savana densa) planic
Landscape Unit
488,319
55
SDFS (savana densa) planic
Landscape Unit
102,175
55
SDFS (savana densa) planic
Landscape Unit
155,688
55
SDFS (savana densa) planic
Landscape Unit
11,975
55
SDFS (savana densa) planic
Landscape Unit
376,606
55
SDFS (savana densa) planic
Landscape Unit
60,869
55
SDFS (savana densa) planic
Landscape Unit
1,638,188
55
SDFS planicies (terras pla
Landscape Unit
346,250
50
SDFS planicies (terras pla
Landscape Unit
45,975
50
SDFS planicies (terras pla
Landscape Unit
176,325
50
SDFS planicies (terras pla
Landscape Unit
537,331
50
SDFS planicies (terras pla
Landscape Unit
629,894
50
SDFS planicies (terras pla
Landscape Unit
687,131
50
SDFS planicies (terras pla
Landscape Unit
391,625
50
SDSF (floresta seca), mosa
Landscape Unit
614,038
40
SDSF (floresta seca), mosa
Landscape Unit
775,388
40
SDSF (floresta seca), mosa
Landscape Unit
499,350
40
SDSF (floresta seca), mosa
Landscape Unit
2,067,500
40
SDSF (floresta seca), mosa
Landscape Unit
245,388
40
SDSF (floresta seca), mosa
Landscape Unit
2,061,794
40
SDSF (floresta seca), mosa
Landscape Unit
549,538
40
SDSF (floresta seca), mosa
Landscape Unit
73,894
40
SESF planicies (onduladas)
Landscape Unit
460,750
50
SESF planicies (onduladas)
Landscape Unit
1,960,888
50
SESF planicies (onduladas)
Landscape Unit
327,363
50
SESF planicies (onduladas)
Landscape Unit
126,256
50
SESF planicies (onduladas)
Landscape Unit
153,538
50
SESF planicies (onduladas)
Landscape Unit
1,177,550
50
SESF planicies (onduladas)
Landscape Unit
133,650
50
SESF planicies (onduladas)
Landscape Unit
231,400
50
SESF planicies (onduladas)
Landscape Unit
24,531
50
Table 11.10.4 – List of Conservation Targets and Goals for the Caatinga Biome.
NAME
TYPE
AREA (ha)
GOAL (%)
Alipiopsitta xanthops
Aves
49,212
100
Amazona rhodocorytha
Aves
31,257
100
Amazona vinacea
Aves
2,495,214
48
Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus
Aves
138,726
95
Anodorhynchus leari
Aves
399,429
77
Anopetia gounellei
Aves
2,200,221
50
Antilophia bokermanni
Aves
878,292
65
Aratinga acuticaudata
Aves
395,874
78
Augastes lumachella
Aves
2,948,355
45
318
Augastes scutatus
Aves
445,086
76
Bubo virginianus deserti
Aves
168,894
91
Carduelis yarrellii
Aves
8,997,462
27
Cercomacra laeta sabinoi
Aves
82,080
100
Conopophaga lineata cearae
Aves
965,061
63
Conopophaga melanops nigrifrons
Aves
82,080
100
Crypturellus noctivagus
Aves
8,941,077
27
Curaeus forbesi
Aves
559,620
72
Cyanopsitta spixii
Aves
1,176,390
60
Geobates poecilopterus
Aves
2,495,214
48
Gyalophylax hellmayri
Aves
5,645,763
34
Harpyhaliaetus coronatus
Aves
2,822,238
46
Hemitriccus mirandae
Aves
1,553,679
55
Herpsilochmus pectoralis
Aves
2,870,694
45
Herpsilochmus sellowi
Aves
4,448,826
38
86
Knipolegus franciscanus
Aves
229,329
Knipolegus nigerrimus
Aves
2,007,288
51
Lepidocolaptes wagleri
Aves
49,212
100
Leucopternis lacernulata
Aves
2,495,214
48
Megaxenops parnaguae
Aves
6,553,539
32
Mitu mitu
Aves
395,874
78
100
Momotus momota marcgraviana
Aves
82,080
Myrmeciza ruficauda
Aves
1,040,544
62
Myrmorchilus strigilatus
Aves
4,889,052
37
Myrmotherula snowi
Aves
32,454
100
Netta erythrophthalma
Aves
1,488,411
56
Nyctiprogne vielliardi
Aves
49,212
100
Oryzoborus maximiliani
Aves
2,217,249
50
Penelope jacucaca
Aves
11,994,579
22
Penelope ochrogaster
Aves
49,212
100
Penelope superciliaris
Aves
197,586
89
Phaethornis ochraceiventris camargoi
Aves
82,080
100
Phyllomyias reiseri
Aves
49,212
100
Phylloscartes beckeri
Aves
2,949,219
45
Phylloscartes ceciliae
Aves
562,590
72
Phylloscartes roquettei
Aves
49,212
100
Picumnus exilis pernambucensis
Aves
215,361
88
Picumnus fulvescens
Aves
2,825,604
46
Picumnus limae
Aves
3,083,508
44
Platyrinchus mystaceus niveigularis
Aves
612,216
70
Polystictus superciliaris
Aves
131,256
96
Procnias averano averano
Aves
341,856
80
Pyriglena atra
Aves
91,971
100
Pyriglena leuconota pernambucensis
Aves
228,258
87
Pyrrhura anaca
Aves
1,531,557
56
Pyrrhura cruentata
Aves
2,495,214
48
Pyrrhura griseipectus
Aves
639,207
70
64
Rhopornis ardesiaca
Aves
939,186
Sakesphorus cristatus
Aves
141,345
94
Sarkidiornis sylvicola
Aves
2,510,433
47
Sclerurus scansor cearensis
Aves
612,270
70
Sporophila albogularis
Aves
4,515,039
38
319
Stigmatura budytoides
Aves
2,466,315
48
Stigmatura napensis
Aves
1,488,411
56
Streptoprocne biscutata
Aves
253,170
85
Synallaxis cinerea
Aves
2,949,219
45
Synallaxis infuscata
Aves
777,951
67
Tangara fastuosa
Aves
1,536,399
55
Terenura sicki
Aves
510,408
73
Thalurania watertonii
Aves
612,216
70
Thamnophilus aethiops distans
Aves
82,080
103
Thamnophilus caerulescens
Aves
176,742
91
Xiphocolaptes falcirostris
Aves
8,438,931
28
Xiphorhynchus fuscus atlanticus
Aves
1,439,370
57
Xolmis irupero
Aves
2,749,230
46
rio de Contas
River Buffer Zone
70,659
100
rio Jaguaribe
River Buffer Zone
282,069
100
rio Moxoto
River Buffer Zone
33,399
100
rio Paraguaçu
River Buffer Zone
130,977
100
rio Parnaiba
River Buffer Zone
156,456
100
rio Piranhas ou Açu
River Buffer Zone
69,030
100
rio Sao Francisco
River Buffer Zone
1,071,126
100
155,844
93
Adelophryne baturitensis
Reptilia
Adelophryne maranguapensis
Reptilia
74,799
100
Adenomera sp. alma-1
Reptilia
215,055
88
Amphisbaena arenaria
Reptilia
115,236
98
Amphisbaena carvalhoi
Reptilia
530,136
73
Amphisbaena Diva-sp.n.
Reptilia
230,643
86
Amphisbaena frontalis
Reptilia
134,073
95
Amphisbaena ignatiana
Reptilia
2,190,402
50
Amphisbaena lumbricalis
Reptilia
61,506
100
Amphisbaena pretrei
Reptilia
254,214
85
Anolis brasiliensis
Reptilia
311,886
81
Anolis chrysolepis brasiliensis
Reptilia
160,974
92
Anolis fuscoauratus
Reptilia
2,721,780
46
Apostolepis cearensis
Reptilia
940,446
63
Apostolepis gaboi
Reptilia
1,632,951
54
Apostolepis gr. pymi
Reptilia
323,883
81
Atractus sp.n.-Diva
Reptilia
348,921
80
Aulura anomala
Reptilia
726,840
68
Bokermannohyla diamantina
Reptilia
1,632,951
54
Bothrops atrox
Reptilia
2,008,278
51
Bothrops erythromelas
Reptilia
3,415,806
42
Bothrops lutzi
Reptilia
215,055
88
Briba brasiliana
Reptilia
13,685,814
20
Caiman crocodilus
Reptilia
215,055
88
Caiman latirostris
Reptilia
138,213
95
Calyptommatus leiolepis
Reptilia
1,902,375
52
Calyptommatus nicterus
Reptilia
557,451
72
Calyptommatus sinebrachiatus
Reptilia
2,190,402
50
Ceratophrys joazeirensis
Reptilia
115,236
98
Cercosaura ocellata
Reptilia
3,480,255
42
Chaunus crucifer
Reptilia
470,061
75
Chaunus granulosus
Reptilia
3,034,575
44
320
Chaunus jimi
Reptilia
149,103
93
Chironius bicarinatus
Reptilia
2,077,947
51
Chironius flavolineatus
Reptilia
160,974
92
Chthonerpeton arii
Reptilia
361,557
79
Coleodactylus brachystoma
Reptilia
134,073
95
Coleodactylus meridionalis
Reptilia
1,343,745
58
Colobosaura mentalis
Reptilia
2,190,402
50
Colobosaura modesta
Reptilia
3,826,566
41
Colobosauroides cearensis
Reptilia
1,182,771
60
Corythomantis greeningi
Reptilia
1,897,209
52
Crotalus durissus cascavella
Reptilia
603,342
71
Dendropsophus branneri
Reptilia
1,829,592
53
Dendropsophus oliveirai
Reptilia
196,641
89
Diploglossus lessonae
Reptilia
1,028,925
62
Drymoluber dichrous
Reptilia
2,263,959
49
Eleutherodactylus gr. ramagii
Reptilia
614,718
70
Enyalius bibronii
Reptilia
4,188,078
39
Enyalius catenatus
Reptilia
131,256
96
Enyalius catenatus catenatus
Reptilia
640,656
70
Eretmochelys imbricata
Reptilia
15,066
100
Eurolophosaurus divaricatus
Reptilia
321,336
81
Eurolophosaurus nanuzae
Reptilia
1,998,027
51
Hemidactylus agrius
Reptilia
2,374,380
48
Hylomantis granulosa
Reptilia
41,319
100
Hypsiboas albopunctatus
Reptilia
1,632,951
54
Hypsiboas crepitans
Reptilia
2,721,240
46
Hypsiboas faber
Reptilia
1,354,086
58
Hypsiboas raniceps
Reptilia
149,103
93
Imantodes cenchoa
Reptilia
348,921
80
Imantodes cenchria
Reptilia
255,681
85
Kentropyx calcarata
Reptilia
237,924
86
Kinosternon scorpioides
Reptilia
1,492,956
56
Lachesis muta
Reptilia
155,844
93
Leposoma baturitensis
Reptilia
2,102,985
50
Leposternon kiteumacheri
Reptilia
49,212
100
Leposternon polystegum
Reptilia
1,144,863
60
Leptodactylus aff. pustulatus
Reptilia
327,861
81
Leptodactylus furnarius
Reptilia
155,844
93
Leptodactylus fuscus
Reptilia
1,088,289
61
Leptodactylus labyrinthicus
Reptilia
1,632,951
54
Leptodactylus mystaceus
Reptilia
323,883
81
Leptodactylus natalensis
Reptilia
155,844
93
Leptodactylus ocellatus
Reptilia
986,724
63
Leptodactylus troglodytes
Reptilia
4,855,689
37
Liophis mossoroensis
Reptilia
684,288
69
Liophis reginae
Reptilia
348,921
80
Liophis viridis
Reptilia
223,389
87
Lygodactylus klugei
Reptilia
2,256,102
49
Mabuya arajara
Reptilia
376,029
78
Mabuya heathi
Reptilia
12,687,165
21
Mabuya nigropunctata
Reptilia
2,003,148
51
Mastigodryas boddaerti
Reptilia
1,935,702
52
321
Micrurus ibiboboca
Reptilia
2,099,520
50
Micrurus lemniscatus
Reptilia
155,844
93
Micrurus sp.n.-Diva
Reptilia
155,844
93
Nothobachia ablephara
Reptilia
2,394,774
48
Odontophrynus aff. carvalhoi-sp.n.
Reptilia
47,538
100
Odontophrynus carvalhoi
Reptilia
668,106
69
Ophiodes gr. striatus
Reptilia
3,480,255
42
Oxyrhopus guibei
Reptilia
323,883
81
Paleosuchus palpebrosus
Reptilia
257,202
85
Phimophis chui
Reptilia
1,632,951
54
Phrynhohyas venulosa
Reptilia
323,883
81
Phrynops tuberculatus
Reptilia
444,825
76
Phyllomedusa bahiana
Reptilia
1,252,521
59
Phyllomedusa hypochondrialis
Reptilia
979,542
63
Phyllopezus periosus
Reptilia
246,978
85
Physalaemus albifrons
Reptilia
2,427,597
48
Physalaemus cicada
Reptilia
2,878,092
45
Physalaemus cuvieri
Reptilia
2,572,137
47
Physalaemus kroeyeri
Reptilia
149,103
93
Placosoma sp.n.-Diva
Reptilia
255,681
85
Pleurodema diplolistris
Reptilia
5,311,161
35
Polychrus marmoratus
Reptilia
2,003,148
51
Procellosaurinus erythrocercus
Reptilia
134,073
95
Procellosaurinus tetradactylus
Reptilia
1,767,024
53
Proceratophrys boiei
Reptilia
74,799
100
Proceratophrys cristiceps
Reptilia
2,910,735
45
Pseudopaludicola sp.
Reptilia
215,055
88
Psilophthalmus paeminosus
Reptilia
2,091,807
50
Rupirana cardosoi
Reptilia
1,968,471
51
Scinax aff. x-signatus
Reptilia
1,952,595
52
Scinax eurydice
Reptilia
265,257
84
Scinax pachycrus
Reptilia
2,199,087
50
Siphonops gr. paulensis
Reptilia
323,883
81
Stenolepis ridleyi
Reptilia
2,721,780
46
Strobilurus torquatus
Reptilia
2,102,985
50
Taeniophalus occipitalis
Reptilia
249,084
85
Thamnodynastes almae
Reptilia
864,306
65
Trachycephalus atlas
Reptilia
1,488,411
56
Trachycephalus mesophaeus
Reptilia
1,756,035
53
Tropidurus amathites
Reptilia
1,632,951
54
Tropidurus cocorobensis
Reptilia
265,770
84
Tropidurus divaricatus
Reptilia
134,073
95
Tropidurus eryhtrocephalus
Reptilia
496,332
74
Tropidurus montanus
Reptilia
2,617,074
47
Tropidurus pinima
Reptilia
2,260,701
49
Tropidurus psammonastes
Reptilia
222,741
87
Typhlops yonenagae
Reptilia
1,632,951
54
Reptilia
Xenohyla eugenioi
1,632,951
54
Atya gabonensis
Invertebrate
6,210
100
Atya scabra
Invertebrate
107,118
99
Coarazuphium cessaima
Invertebrate
30,717
100
Corvospongilla volkmeri
Invertebrate
53,271
100
322
Heraclides himeros baia
Invertebrate
984,123
63
Hypocephalus armatus
Invertebrate
984,123
63
Iandumoema uai
Invertebrate
49,212
100
Macrobrachium carcinus
Invertebrate
2,128,446
50
Megasoma gyas rumbucheri
Invertebrate
523,341
73
Minyocerus angustus
Invertebrate
229,491
86
Perissophlebiodes flinti
Invertebrate
1,632,951
54
Scada karschina delicata
Invertebrate
82,080
100
Alouatta belzebul
Mammalia
1,176,831
60
Alouatta belzebul ululata
Mammalia
3,379,833
43
Bradypus torquatus
Mammalia
190,440
90
Callicebus barbarabrownae
Mammalia
7,718,256
29
Callicebus coimbrai
Mammalia
390,105
78
Callicebus personatus barbarabrownae
Mammalia
2,702,997
46
Dasyprocta sp. n.
Mammalia
87,732
100
Galea spixii
Mammalia
7,955,667
29
Kerodon rupestris
Mammalia
9,329,481
26
Leopardo tigrinus
Mammalia
3,324,213
43
Leopardo wiedi
Mammalia
1,137,654
60
Lonchophylla dekeyseri
Mammalia
452,493
75
Lonchophylla sp.
Mammalia
1,230,894
59
Lonchophylla sp.
Mammalia
1,230,894
59
Mazama gouazoupira
Mammalia
1,298,628
58
Micronycteris sanborni
Mammalia
773,244
67
Myotis ruber
Mammalia
571,455
72
Oligoryzomys stramineus
Mammalia
652,113
69
Oryzomys sp. n.
Mammalia
93,240
100
Oxymycterus sp. n.
Mammalia
372,321
79
Panthera onca
Mammalia
4,175,928
39
Physeter macrocephalus
Mammalia
263,097
84
Platyrrhinus recifinus
Mammalia
530,136
73
Proechimys albispinus minor
Mammalia
322,749
81
Proechimys albispinus sertonius
Mammalia
481,581
74
Proechimys sp.
Mammalia
160.974
92
Puma concolor
Mammalia
1,615.482
55
Puma concolor greeni
Mammalia
1,391,868
57
Rhipidomys sp. n. ssp. 1
Mammalia
160,974
92
Thylamys karimii
Mammalia
612,270
70
Tolypeutes tricinctus
Mammalia
23,125,689
11
Trichechus manatus
Mammalia
837,864
65
Wiedomys pyrrhorhinos
Mammalia
4,282,443
39
Cynolebias albipunctatus
Pisces
549
100
Cynolebias gilbertoi
Pisces
3,591
100
Cynolebias leptocephalus
Pisces
1,008
100
Cynolebias microphthalmus
Pisces
12,591
100
Cynolebias perforatus
Pisces
4,437
100
Simpsonichthys antenori
Pisces
18,693
100
Simpsonichthys flavicaudatus
Pisces
5,706
100
Simpsonichthys fulminantis
Pisces
2,655
100
Simpsonichthys ghisolfi
Pisces
3,852
100
Simpsonichthys hellneri
Pisces
5,751
100
Simpsonichthys magnificus
Pisces
17,190
100
323
Simpsonichthys stellatus
Pisces
5,553
100
Acacia kallunkiae
Plantae
801,774
66
Acacia piauhiensis
Plantae
1,086,066
61
Acritopappus catolesensis
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Acritopappus connatifolius
Plantae
484,272
74
Acritopappus pintoi
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Adenocalymma dichilum
Plantae
1,248,435
59
Aeschynomene martii
Plantae
1,849,032
52
Agrianthus almasensis
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Agrianthus giuliettiae
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Alcantarea nahoumii
Plantae
59,931
100
Allamanda blanchetii
Plantae
6,125,670
33
Alvimiantha tricamerata
Plantae
3,494,340
42
Anamaria heterophylla
Plantae
561,933
72
Annona spinescens
Plantae
1,799,613
53
Annona vepretorum
Plantae
235,080
86
Apterokarpos gardneri
Plantae
2,160,108
50
Arachis pusilla
Plantae
1,754,487
53
Arachis triseminata
Plantae
1,826,397
53
Argyrovernonia harleyi
Plantae
391,599
78
Arrabidaea dispar
Plantae
1,224,756
59
Arrojadoa bahiensis
Arrojadoa dinae
Plantae
131,292
96
Plantae
222,741
87
Arrojadoa penicillata
Plantae
1,490,265
56
Arrojadoa rhodantha
Plantae
365,004
79
Aspidosperma cuspa
Plantae
3,180,231
44
Aspidosperma pyrifolium
Plantae
6,631,875
32
Aspilia almasensis
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Attalea seabrensis
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Auxemma glazioviana
Plantae
3,501,558
42
Auxemma oncocalyx
Plantae
2,110,068
50
Baccharis polyphylla
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Baccharis pseudobrevifolia
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Balfourodendron molle
Plantae
2,011,527
51
Banisteriopsis harleyi
Plantae
1,632,915
54
Barjonia harleyi
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Barnebya harleyi
Plantae
5,317,290
35
Bauhinia cacovia subsp. Blanchetiana
Plantae
223,344
87
Bauhinia harleyi
Plantae
131,292
96
Blanchetia heterotricha
Plantae
3,455,964
42
Blanchetiodendron blanchetii
Plantae
1,128,213
61
Blepharodon hirsutum
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Bombacopsis retusa
Plantae
2,562,255
47
Brasiliopuntia brasilensis
Plantae
2,048,859
51
Bromelia laciniosa
Plantae
399,438
77
Byrsonima pedunculata
Plantae
41,319
100
Caesalpinia calycina
Plantae
3,725,001
41
Caesalpinia gardneriana
Plantae
2,848,113
45
Caesalpinia laxiflora
Plantae
2,139,597
50
Caesalpinia microphylla Mart. ex G. Don
Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. var.
pyramidalis
Plantae
4,825,422
37
Plantae
5,495,058
35
Calliandra aeschynomenoides
Plantae
5,922,441
33
324
Calliandra imperialis
Plantae
146,538
94
Calliandra leptopoda
Plantae
1,830,636
53
Calliandra macrocalyx
Plantae
2,546,712
47
Calliandra macrocalyx Benth. var. aucta
Calliandra macrocalyx Benth. var.
macrocalyx
Plantae
1,488,429
56
Plantae
3,472,236
42
Calliandra squarrosa
Plantae
1,231,974
59
Calliandra ulei
Plantae
18,279
100
Capparis cynophallophora
Plantae
1,662,948
54
Capparis flexuosa
Plantae
7,835,256
29
Capparis jacobinae
Plantae
5,592,582
34
Capparis yco
Plantae
7,099,731
31
Catolesia mentiens
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Cattleya elongata
Plantae
2,333,430
49
Ceiba glaziovii
Plantae
3,643,767
41
Chamaecrista belemii var. belemii
Plantae
1,652,409
54
Chamaecrista belemii var. paludicola
Plantae
149,121
93
Chamaecrista coradini
Plantae
984,078
63
Chaptalia chapadensis
Plantae
484,272
74
Chloroleucon dumosum
Plantae
149,121
93
Chloroleucon extortum
Plantae
1,632,915
54
Cnidoscolus bahiensis
Plantae
3,150,342
44
Cnidoscolus caesifolius
Plantae
4,997,223
36
Combretum monetaria
Plantae
247,896
85
Combretum pisonioides
Plantae
3,183,255
44
Commiphora leptpphloeos
Cordia leucocephala
Plantae
9,125,442
26
Plantae
8,150,796
28
Cordia leucomalloides
Plantae
673,461
69
Coursetia rostrata
Plantae
2,538,171
47
Cratylia mollis
Plantae
1,964,979
51
Crotalaria holosericea
Plantae
3,836,556
41
Croton argyrophylloides
Plantae
2,719,026
46
Croton campestris
Plantae
4,712,364
37
Crumenaria decumbens
Plantae
5,777,253
34
Cryptanthus burle-marxii
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Cuphea bahiensis
Plantae
700,515
68
Cuphea circaeoides
Plantae
2,780,631
46
Cuphea pulchra
Plantae
4,525,857
38
Dalbergia catingicola
Plantae
1,351,512
58
Dalbergia cearensis
Plantae
7,107,939
31
Dalbergia decipularis
Plantae
3,324,708
43
Diatenopteryx grazielae
Plantae
2,241,099
49
Dimerostemma episcopale
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Dioclea marginata
Plantae
236,115
86
Diplusodon argyrophyllus
Plantae
2,572,065
47
Diplusodon epilobioides
Plantae
2,616,993
47
Diplusodon quintuplinervius
Plantae
984,078
63
Discocactus bahiensis
Plantae
168,858
91
Encholirium spectabile
Plantae
859,941
65
Enterolobium gummiferum
Plantae
2,981,997
45
Evolvulus chamaepitys
Plantae
1,632,915
54
Ficus lapensis
Plantae
6,327
100
Floscopa glabrata
Plantae
1,632,915
54
325
Fraunhofera multiflora
Plantae
1,657,251
54
Glischrothamnus ulei
Plantae
1,766,997
53
Godmania dardanoi
Plantae
7,883,145
29
Gomphrena chrestoides
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Gorceixia decurrens
Plantae
2,631,123
47
Guettarda angelica
Plantae
3,999,042
40
Guettarda sericea
Plantae
612,225
70
Harpochilus neesianus
Plantae
4,801,770
37
Hoehnephytum almasense
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Holoregmia viscida
Plantae
3,593,178
42
Hymenaea eriogyne
Plantae
3,688,920
41
Indigofera blanchetiana
Plantae
2,284,506
49
Ipomoea longistamina
Plantae
984,078
63
Ipomoea marsellia
Plantae
223,344
87
Ipomoea pintoi
Plantae
399,438
77
Jacaranda rugosa
Plantae
530,100
73
Jatropha hastifolia
Plantae
247,896
85
Jatropha mollissima
Plantae
12,402,387
21
Jatropha mutabilis
Plantae
3,061,197
44
Jatropha ribifolia
Plantae
7,594,065
29
Lafoensia pacari
Plantae
1,632,915
54
Leiothrix distichoclada
Plantae
3,317,571
43
Leucochloron limae
Plantae
2,048,859
51
Licania rigida
Plantae
4,601,142
38
Lippia thymoides
Plantae
4,663,467
37
Lychnophora crispa
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Lychnophora phylicifolia
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Lychnophora santosii
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Lychnophora sericea
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Machaonia spinosa
Plantae
1,493,055
56
Macvaughia bahiana
Plantae
1,490,265
56
Maranta zingiberana
Plantae
530,100
73
Maytenus rigida
Plantae
2,732,841
46
Melanoxylon brauna
Plantae
365,004
79
Melocactus glaucescens
Plantae
280,413
83
Melocactus paucispinus
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Melocactus zehntheri
Plantae
2,412,342
48
Mikania alvimii
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Mikania jeffreyi
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Mikania nelsonii
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Mimosa adenophylla var. Armandiana
Plantae
1,220,193
59
Mimosa adenophylla var. mitis
Plantae
236,115
86
Mimosa brevipinna
Plantae
1,287,270
58
Mimosa campicola var. planipes
Plantae
588,348
71
Mimosa coruscocaesia
Plantae
939,150
64
Mimosa exalbescens
Plantae
55,584
100
Mimosa hortensis
Plantae
168,858
91
Mimosa lepidophora
Plantae
3,379,455
43
Mimosa leptantha
Plantae
229,455
86
Mimosa mensicola
Plantae
131,292
96
Mimosa misera var. Subinermis
Plantae
399,438
77
Mimosa modesta var. modesta
Plantae
1,363,005
57
326
Mimosa niomarlei
Plantae
671,400
69
Mimosa ophthalmocentra
Plantae
2,397,213
48
Mimosa pseudosepiaria
Plantae
804,411
66
Mimosa pteridifolia
Plantae
335,574
80
Mimosa setuligera
Plantae
3,359,016
43
Mimosa subenervis
Plantae
707,715
68
Mimosa ulbrichiana
Plantae
2,948,607
45
Mimosa xiquexiquensis
Plantae
1,043,658
62
Moquinia racemosa
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Mouriri pusa
Plantae
1,632,915
54
Myracrodruon urundeuva
Plantae
3,514,644
42
Mysanthus uleanus
Plantae
4,255,731
39
Neesiochloa barbata
Plantae
1,640,889
54
Neoglaziovia variegata
Plantae
9,457,785
26
Orthophytum lemei
Plantae
365,004
79
Orthophytum maracasense
Plantae
1,490,265
56
Paepalanthus speciosus
Plantae
1,632,915
54
Paralychnophora atkinsiae
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Paralychnophora harleyi
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Paralychnophora patriciana
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Paralychnophora reflexoauriculata
Plantae
530,100
73
Paralychnophora santosii
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Parapiptadenia zehntneri
Plantae
4,983,696
36
Patagonula bahiensis
Plantae
247,896
85
Peltogyne pauciflora
Plantae
6,866,262
31
Pfaffia townsendii
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Physocalyx scaberrimus
Plantae
1,632,915
54
Pilcarpus sulcatus
Plantae
222,741
87
Pilocarpus trachylophus
Plantae
2,652,534
47
Pleurophora anomala
Plantae
7,228,260
30
Porophyllum bahiense
Plantae
1997,919
51
Pseudobombax simplicifolium
Plantae
2,250,459
49
Randia nitida
Plantae
530,100
73
Rhamnidium molle
Plantae
1,534,374
56
Sampaiella trichoclada
Plantae
1,632,915
54
Schinopsis brasiliensis
Plantae
10,057,203
25
Senna acuruensis var. acuruensis
Plantae
4,545,909
38
Senna acuruensis var. Caatingae
Plantae
1,810,989
53
Senna acuruensis var. Interjecta
Plantae
939,150
64
Senna aversiflora
Plantae
2,580,057
47
Senna gardneri
Plantae
563,823
72
Senna harleyi
Plantae
1,162,494
60
Senna martiana
Plantae
452,484
75
Senna rizzini
Plantae
2,258,199
49
Simaba ferruginea
Plantae
1,869,030
52
Spondias tuberosa
Plantae
7,349,841
30
Stephanocereus leucostele
Plantae
1,812,285
53
Stephanocereus luetzelburgii
Plantae
2,278,332
49
Stilpnopappus suffruticosus
Plantae
1,426,014
57
Stilpnopappus tomentosus
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Stylosanthes bahiensis
Plantae
1,632,915
54
Syagrus vagans
Plantae
1,764,207
53
327
Syngonanthus curralensis
Plantae
1,639,431
54
Syngonanthus nitens
Plantae
2,616,993
47
Tacinga inamoena
Plantae
8,842,095
27
Tacinga palmadora
Plantae
1,490,265
56
Trixis pruskii
Plantae
1,997,919
51
Zanthoxylum hamadryadicum
Plantae
2,917,773
45
Ziziphus cotinifolia
Plantae
4,063,446
40
Zornia echinocarpa
Plantae
2,591,460
47
Zornia harmsiana
Plantae
247,896
85
Zornia ulei
Plantae
247,896
85
Agestre e Brejo da Paraíba. Costa Nordeste
de Ibiapaba - CE
Phytogeographical Unit
134,487
95
Agreste Castro Alves - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
304,767
82
Agreste de Feira Nova, Itabaiana e Santa
Rosa de Lima - SE
Phytogeographical Unit
41,067
100
Agreste de Itabaiana, Mulungu, Itatuba PB; Timbaúba - PE
Phytogeographical Unit
197,163
89
Agreste de Riachuelo - RN
Phytogeographical Unit
526,185
73
Aluviões do Baixo Jaguaribe - CE
Phytogeographical Unit
94,743
100
Aluviões do Baixo Parnaíba - PI/MA
Phytogeographical Unit
65,475
100
Aluviões do Rio São Francisco (de
Carinhanha a Xique-Xique) - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
367,659
79
Área do Alto Médio São Francisco - Região
do São Francisco - MG
Phytogeographical Unit
684
100
Área do Médio Rio das Velhas - MG Região
de Pirapora
Phytogeographical Unit
963
100
Phytogeographical Unit
461,880
75
Phytogeographical Unit
461,871
75
59
Áreas Aplainadas da Superfície dos Cariris
(Região de Cabaceiras e do Curimataú)
Áreas Aplainadas Desgastadas ao Norte da
Região de Campo Maior. Buriti dos Lopes PI
Áreas Aplianadas Desgastadas ao Sul da
Região de Campo Maior. Barras e Capitão
de Campos - PI
Phytogeographical Unit
1,209,537
Áreas Associadas … Serra da Gameleira
Phytogeographical Unit
1,163,772
60
Áreas Baixas de Restinga - MA
Áreas Baixas do Litoral Norte do Cear .
Região de Senador S , Granja e Oeste de
Maranguape
Áreas de "Areias Brancas" Disseminadas
nos Estados de AL, BA, CE, PI, PE, RN e
SE
Phytogeographical Unit
3,771
100
Phytogeographical Unit
636,894
70
Phytogeographical Unit
1,150,713
60
Áreas de "Areias Brancas" Disseminadas
nos Estados de BA, PB, PE, RN, SE.
Phytogeographical Unit
288,819
83
Áreas de Dunas do Rio Grande do Norte,
Cear e Maranhão
Phytogeographical Unit
89,307
100
Áreas de Maciços Residuais, Encostas das
Serras de Baturité, Uruburetama e Meruoca
- CE, Triunfo - P
Phytogeographical Unit
263,304
84
Áreas de Manguezais da Bahia, Sergipe,
Pernambuco e Maranhão
Phytogeographical Unit
8,532
100
Áreas de Pediplano do Sertão Central da
Bahia (Ipira), do Sertão de Alagoas e do
Sertão Oriental de
Phytogeographical Unit
1,729,215
54
Áreas de Relevo Suave Ondulado de
Ouricuri e Petrolina - PE
Phytogeographical Unit
1,488,411
56
328
Áreas de Relevo Suave Ondulado e
Predominantemente Cascalhentas na
Calha do Rio São Francisco Entre
Áreas Desgastadas do Planalto da
Borborema
Áreas Dissecadas a Ocidente do Rio
Pamaíba
Phytogeographical Unit
1,047,393
62
Phytogeographical Unit
133,281
95
Phytogeographical Unit
615,195
70
Áreas Dissecadas de Jeremoabo - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
87,732
100
Áreas Dissecadas de Poço Verde - SE
Phytogeographical Unit
11,439
100
Áreas Dissecadas do Alto Parnaíba
Áreas Dissecadas do Médio e Baixo
Parnaíba
Phytogeographical Unit
182,286
90
Phytogeographical Unit
341,595
80
Áreas Dissecadas do Norte do Recôncavo
Baiano - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
14,526
100
Áreas Dissecadas do Recôncavo Oriental Região de Itanagra - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
12,618
100
Áreas do Baixo Sertão do Piranhas
(Pombal - Brejo do Cruz - PB), de Itaú - RN,
Sertäes do Alto e Méd
Phytogeographical Unit
3,460,086
42
Áreas do Sertão do Alto Jaguaribe
(Altaneiro, Campos Sales e Cedro - CE)
Áreas do Vale do Rio Gurguéia e
Superfícies Associadas. Região de Eliseu
Martins - PI
Phytogeographical Unit
405,666
77
Phytogeographical Unit
195,120
89
Áreas Entalhadas da Costa da Serra do
Pereiro - CE, e Áreas Circunvizinhas
Phytogeographical Unit
107,370
99
Áreas Férteis Próximas aos Municípios de
Elesbão Veloso e Esperantina
Phytogeographical Unit
192,123
89
Áreas Muito Desgastadas do Planalto da
Borborema - Região de Soledade (PB)
Região dos Cariris
Phytogeographical Unit
210,825
88
Áreas Muito Dissecadas do Agreste de São
Bento do Trairi (RN)
Phytogeographical Unit
109,026
99
Áreas Tabulares Costeiras a Oeste da Foz
do Rio Jaguaribe no Estado do Cear .
Região de Pacajus e Ca
Phytogeographical Unit
229,491
86
Áreas Tabulares Costeiras do Estado do
Piauí e a Oeste do Rio Curu no Cear .
Região de Acarau, Bela
Phytogeographical Unit
361,998
79
Áreas Tabulares Costeiras do Rio Grande
do Norte. Região de Cear Mirim, São
Gonçalo do Amarante, Ma
Phytogeographical Unit
28,368
100
Áreas Tabulares Costeiras dos Estados da
Paraíba e do Rio Grande do Norte. Região
de Extremoz e Cang
Phytogeographical Unit
2,943
100
Áreas Tabulares Costeiras no Estado do
Cear (Baixo Jaguaribe) e Rio Grande do
Norte. Região de Arac
Phytogeographical Unit
127,503
96
Áreas Tabulares Costeiras no Estado do
Rio Grande do Norte. Região de Pedra
Grande e São Bento do No
Phytogeographical Unit
114,498
98
Áreas Tabulares Costeiras Próximas ao Rio
Curu. Região de Itapipoca, São Luis do
Curu, São Gonçalo d
Phytogeographical Unit
173,430
91
329
Áreas Tabulares Costeiros de AL, PE e SE.
Região de Marechal Deodoro e São Miguel
dos Campos - AL. G
Phytogeographical Unit
33,714
100
Areias de Maurití - CE
Phytogeographical Unit
24,741
100
Bacia do Rio do Peixe Região de Souza e
Antenor Navarro - PB
Phytogeographical Unit
53,271
100
Bacias de Jatob , São José do Belmonte PE, Jati, Penaforte - CE
Phytogeographical Unit
521,136
73
Baixio de Irecˆ - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
673,398
69
Baixo Platô de Malhada - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
6,714
100
Chapada da Ibiapaba (Setor Ocidental)
Phytogeographical Unit
418,545
77
Chapada da Ibiapaba (Setor Oriental)
Phytogeographical Unit
93,240
100
Chapada de Coração de Jesus
Phytogeographical Unit
1,323
100
Chapada do Apodi - Região Salineira e do
Centro Norte - RN
Phytogeographical Unit
314,685
81
Chapada do Apodi - Região Salineira,
Jandaíra - RN
Chapada do Apodi - Região Sul de Mossoró
- RN
Phytogeographical Unit
105,642
99
Phytogeographical Unit
531,864
73
Chapada do Araripe (Setor Ocidental)
Phytogeographical Unit
199,287
89
Chapada do Araripe (Setor Oriental)
Phytogeographical Unit
163,755
92
Chapadäes do Extremo Sul do Maranhão e
do Piauí
Phytogeographical Unit
181,224
90
Chapadäes do Extremo Sul do Piauí
Phytogeographical Unit
1,159,632
60
Chapadas Associadas … Serra da Cangalia
Phytogeographical Unit
146,556
94
Chapadas Intermedi rias Associadas …
Serra da Tabatinga
Phytogeographical Unit
33,606
100
Chapadas Orientais do Piauí
Phytogeographical Unit
1,754,064
53
Chapadas Sul Orientais do Piauí
Phytogeographical Unit
1,287,279
58
Colinas do Recôncavo Baiano - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
396
100
Contraforte da Serra de Santana
Phytogeographical Unit
252,009
85
Contrafortes da Borborema
Phytogeographical Unit
295,578
82
Dunas de Barra e Pilão Arcado - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
643,149
70
Dunas de Casa Nova e Pilão Arcado - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
233,469
86
Encosta da Chapada da Diamantina,
Região de Wagner e Bonfim-BA
Encosta do Planalto de Vitória da Conquista
- BA
Phytogeographical Unit
243,081
86
Phytogeographical Unit
18
100
Encosta Leste da Chapada Diamantina Região de Utinga, Wagner e Itaeté - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
59,580
100
Phytogeographical Unit
322,254
81
Phytogeographical Unit
54,072
100
Phytogeographical Unit
785,799
66
Phytogeographical Unit
43,344
100
Phytogeographical Unit
96,831
100
Phytogeographical Unit
14,724
100
Encosta Ocidental da Serra do Espinhaço Porteirinha - MG
Encosta Oriental das Berais. Região de
Santa Maria da Vitória - BA e Montalvania MG
Encostas das Serras dos Cariris Novos,
Ibiapaba e dos Sertäes de Monsenhor
Tabosa, Tamboril, Piquet
Encostas do Planalto do São Francisco.
Região de Montes Claros, Capitão Enéas,
Bocaiuva - MG
Encostas dos Gerais - BA. Médio Parnaíba
- PI. Alto e Médio Parnaíba, Alto Mearim,
Itapecurú - MA
Encostas Sul-Orientais do Raso da
Catarina, Região de Ribeira do Pombal e
Cícero Dantas - BA
330
Maciços e Serras Altas, Serra do Espinhaço
- MG, Encosta da Chapada Diamantina BA e Serras do Médi
Phytogeographical Unit
2,348,847
49
Maciços e Serras Altas. Maciço de Santo
Sé e Sobradinho - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
603,342
71
Maciços e Serras Baixas. Serras do
Boqueirão, Estreito, Jacobina, Itiuba - BA.
Maciço da Borborema -
Phytogeographical Unit
377,604
78
Maciços e Serras Baixas. Sertäes do
Moxotó, Pajeú, Serras das Araras, Do Olho
D'Água, Do Vermelho, d
Maciços e Serras Baixas. Sertão Central do
Cear
Phytogeographical Unit
1,775,079
53
Phytogeographical Unit
197,586
89
Maciços Residuais de Palmares - SE
Phytogeographical Unit
54,009
100
Margem da Foz do Rio São Francisco.
Agreste de Propri - SE
Phytogeographical Unit
31,257
100
Pediplano Associado …s Serras do
Boqueirão e do Estreito - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
36,783
100
Phytogeographical Unit
98,253
100
Pediplano da Calha do Rio São Francisco
na Região de Carinhanha - BA
Pediplanos Associados as Serras da
Barriguda e da Boiada (RN-PB) e da Aruaru
- CE
Pediplanos de Extremo Sul do Sertão do
Piauí
Phytogeographical Unit
640,746
70
Phytogeographical Unit
524,601
73
Pediplanos do Estremos Sudeste do Piauí,
Casa Nova - BA e Norte de Petrolina - PE
Phytogeographical Unit
669,510
69
Pediplanos do Rio Verde Grande e
Afluentes, Região de Mato Verde, Janauba
e Varzelândia - MG
Phytogeographical Unit
353,088
79
Pediplanos do Sertão do Centro Norte,
Região de Angicos - RN
Phytogeographical Unit
339,381
80
Pediplanos do Sertão do São Francisco BA. Uaua, Juazeiro e Santo Sé - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
478,647
74
Phytogeographical Unit
60,030
100
Phytogeographical Unit
1,079,595
61
Phytogeographical Unit
964,521
63
Phytogeographical Unit
64,134
100
Piemonte Norte do Araripe: Sertão do Cariri
(Juazeiro do Norte - CE)
Phytogeographical Unit
99,171
100
Piemonte Sul do Araripe, Sertão de
Ipubi/Araripina - PE
Phytogeographical Unit
28,377
100
Piemontes Dissecadas da Serra de
Jacobina e Chapada Diamantina Caldeirão Grande e Mirangaba - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
321,300
81
Piemontes dos Altos Maciços Centrais e
Relevos Associados
Phytogeographical Unit
984,123
63
Phytogeographical Unit
516,024
73
Phytogeographical Unit
179,352
90
Pediplanos doExtremo Leste de Sergipe e
de Pedro Alexandre - BA
Pediplanos dos Sertäes da Divisa
Piauí/Bahia
Pediplanos Erodidos do Sertão Central,
Região Leste de Quixadá, General
Sampaio e Sudeste de Santa Q
Pequenas Áreas Férteis Próximas aos
Municípios de Miguel Leão e Joaquim Pires
- PI
Piemontes dos Altos Maciços Centrais e
Relevos Associados
Piemontes dos Altos Maciços Centrais e
Relevos Associados (Oliveira dos Brejinhos
e Ipupiara - BA)
331
Piemontes Pouco Dissecadas da Serra de
Jacobina e da Chapada Diamantina Regiäes de Serrolândia, Ca
Phytogeographical Unit
421,146
77
Planalto de Tapiramut -BA
Planalto de Vitória da Conquista e
Planaltino-BA
Phytogeographical Unit
322,749
81
Phytogeographical Unit
229,788
86
Planaltos Entre Maciços e Planalto de
Morro do Chapéu-BA
Phytogeographical Unit
569,340
72
Phytogeographical Unit
517,824
73
Planície Ocidental do Rio São Francisco,
Região de Bom Jesus da Lapa - BA
Platôs do Irece, V rzea Nova, Euclides da
Cunha e Paripiranga - BA e Pedra Mole SE
Phytogeographical Unit
451,413
75
Platôs do Salitre, Patamuté e Curaç - BA
Relevos Dissecados do Sertão do Extremo
Oeste da Paraíba (Monte Horebe,
Itaporanga)
Phytogeographical Unit
383,490
78
Phytogeographical Unit
166,491
92
Serra da Tabatinga
Phytogeographical Unit
6,876
100
Serra do Espinhaço-MG
Serras de Santana, Portalegre, Martins e do
Cuité
Phytogeographical Unit
26,181
100
Phytogeographical Unit
79,146
100
Serrotes do Alto Piauí (Canindé)
Phytogeographical Unit
34,200
100
Sertäes de Morpara e do Norte da Represa
de Sobradinho - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
495,261
74
Phytogeographical Unit
3,074,355
44
Phytogeographical Unit
279,585
83
Phytogeographical Unit
1,804,302
53
Phytogeographical Unit
37,926
100
Sul do Sertão de Piranhas e Sertão do
Oeste da Paraíba. Sertão Central,
Jaguaribe e Salgado, Serras
Phytogeographical Unit
878,103
65
Superfície Dissecada da Região de Rui
Barbosa - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
558,576
72
Sertões: do Alto Pajeú (Serra Talhada e
São José do Egito), do Alto do Moxotó
(Custódia), do São Fra
Sertão de Alagoas. Curimatau, Borborema
Central - PB. Sul do Agreste do Rio Grande
do Norte. Litoral
Sertão do Jeremoabo - BA, Sertão do São
Francisco - SE e Al. Borborema Central PB. Encostas das Se
Sudoeste do Planalto de Vitória da
Conquista-MG
Superfície Dissecada do Rio das Contas
Associada a Encosta Oriental da Chapada
Diamantina
Phytogeographical Unit
948,411
63
Phytogeographical Unit
666,657
69
Phytogeographical Unit
103,185
99
Tabuleiros Baixos e Entalhes Associados
de S tiro Dias e Ribeira do Pombal - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
481,581
74
Tabuleiros de Juazeiro - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
82,917
100
Tabuleiros Dissecados de Cruz das Almas
e Mutuipe - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
10,692
100
Phytogeographical Unit
1,206
100
Superfícies Entalhadas do Cristalino
Tabuleiros Arenosos de Ribeira do Amparo
- BA
Tabuleiros Dissecados de Estância,
Aporanga, D'Ajuda e Divina Pastora - SE
Tabuleiros do Nordeste do Maranhão.
Região de Urbano Santos, Santa Quitéria e
Barreirinhas - MA
Phytogeographical Unit
2,196
100
Tabuleiros do Raso da Catarina - BA
Phytogeographical Unit
864,306
65
Tabuleiros Interioranos Altos do Centro Sul
do Maranhão
Phytogeographical Unit
26,568
100
332
Tabuleiros Interioranos Baixos do Centro
Sul do Maranhão
Phytogeographical Unit
Tabuleiros Pouco Dissecados de
Esplanada e Feira de Santana - BA
4,968
100
Phytogeographical Unit
170,685
91
ANGICO - BA
Sustainable Use
992,574
2
ANGICO - BA 2
Sustainable Use
161,406
8
ANGICO - CARIRI PB
Sustainable Use
132,624
7
AROEIRA - BA
Sustainable Use
678,051
8
AROEIRA - INHAMUNS
Sustainable Use
863,586
5
AROEIRA - PE
Sustainable Use
1,602,504
3
CARNAUBA - BA
Sustainable Use
421,794
3
CARNAUBA - PI
Sustainable Use
135,072
25
CARNAUBA - PI 2
Sustainable Use
538,524
14
CARNAUBA - PI 3
Sustainable Use
314,253
16
CARNAUBA - RN
Sustainable Use
69,840
74
CARNAUBA CE-1
Sustainable Use
390,465
13
CARNAUBA CE-2
Sustainable Use
351,558
13
CAROA - BA
Sustainable Use
992,574
1
CAROA - MOXOTO
Sustainable Use
83,664
12
CAROA - PAJEU
Sustainable Use
184,446
1
CAROA - PB
Sustainable Use
35,721
1
CAROA - PI
Sustainable Use
212,616
1
CUMARU - CE
Sustainable Use
510,363
12
CUMARU - PE
Sustainable Use
449,991
14
CUMARU - SERIDO
Sustainable Use
650,079
9
ERVA DE OVELHA ALFAVA DO
NORDESTE - CE
Sustainable Use
549,441
9
ERVA DE OVELHA ALFAVA DO
NORDESTE - RN
Sustainable Use
296,721
17
FACHEIRO - PB
Sustainable Use
100,836
13
FACHEIRO - XINGO
Sustainable Use
201,879
7
FAVA D´ANTA - CHAPADA DO ARARIPE
Sustainable Use
159,066
12
FAVELA - INHAMUNS
Sustainable Use
863,586
5
FAVELA - MOXOTO
Sustainable Use
741,258
6
FAVELA - SERIDO
Sustainable Use
83,664
45
FREJO - PE
Sustainable Use
86,796
58
FREJO_CE
Sustainable Use
549,441
9
FREJO_CE2
Sustainable Use
770,760
7
IMBURANA DE CAMBAO - BA
IMBURANA DE CAMBAO - CARIRI
PARAIBANO
Sustainable Use
1,689,993
3
Sustainable Use
104,679
47
IMBURANA DE CAMBAO - MOXOTO
Sustainable Use
936,180
6
IMBURANA DE CAMBAO - PI
Sustainable Use
308,079
17
IMBURANA DE CAMBAO - VALE RSF
Sustainable Use
898,686
6
L_ACU
Sustainable Use
1,965,978
2
L_ARARIPE
Sustainable Use
1,281,636
22
L_CAL
Sustainable Use
1,756,449
1
L_CAL2
Sustainable Use
475,848
1
L_CAULIM
Sustainable Use
2,112,489
1
L_CERAMICA
Sustainable Use
706,797
7
L_FRECHEIR
Sustainable Use
690,489
1
L_MATO_GRA
Sustainable Use
910,566
5
L_MOXOTO
Sustainable Use
2,163,366
1
333
L_PETROLIN
Sustainable Use
780,543
2
L_RUSSAS
Sustainable Use
584,793
9
L_SANTA_CE
Sustainable Use
579,006
1
L_SIDERURG
Sustainable Use
18,538,587
7
L_SIDERURG
Sustainable Use
2,096,055
1
L_SUDOESTE
Sustainable Use
4,086,801
7
L_UMIRIM
Sustainable Use
553,743
1
L_VERMICUL
Sustainable Use
2,221,218
1
LENHA
Sustainable Use
41,504,364
3
LICURI_1
Sustainable Use
343,836
43
LICURI_2
Sustainable Use
572,112
29
LICURI_3
Sustainable Use
388,836
36
LICURI_4
Sustainable Use
61,479
69
MANDACARU - BA
Sustainable Use
1,689,993
2
MANDACARU - CE
Sustainable Use
549,441
9
MANDACARU - PI
Sustainable Use
308,079
3
MANICOBA - BA
Sustainable Use
1,689,993
5
MANICOBA - CARIRI PB
Sustainable Use
104,679
41
MANICOBA - MOXOTO E PAJEU
Sustainable Use
1,407,537
4
MARACUJA DO MATO - BA
Sustainable Use
1,689,993
16
MARACUJA DO MATO - PE
Sustainable Use
681,336
6
MARMELEIRO - CARIRI PB
Sustainable Use
104,679
8
MARMELEIRO - MOXOTO E PAJEU
Sustainable Use
1,407,537
1
MARMELEIRO - SERIDO RN
Sustainable Use
426,816
3
MARMELEIRO - SERTAO NORTE CE
Sustainable Use
549,441
2
O_ONC_PB
Sustainable Use
111,384
33
O_ONC_PB2
OITICICA - VALE DO RIO APODI E
CARMO - RN
OITICICA - VALE DO RIO JAGUARIBE CE
Sustainable Use
153,081
44
Sustainable Use
9,846
47
Sustainable Use
46,431
12
OITICICA_P
Sustainable Use
2,061
87
OITICICA_P
Sustainable Use
675
100
ORELHA DE ONCA - PAJEU
Sustainable Use
804,465
6
QUIPA - BA
Sustainable Use
1,689,993
1
QUIPA - CARIRI PB
Sustainable Use
104,679
10
QUIPA - MOXOTO
Sustainable Use
608,688
2
QUIPA - SERIDO
Sustainable Use
650,079
1
RECUPERACAO - CE 1
Sustainable Use
193,392
27
RECUPERACAO - CE 2
Sustainable Use
719,595
9
37
RECUPERACAO - GIUBUES
Sustainable Use
25,407
SABIA - CE
Sustainable Use
457,929
2
UMBU - BA
Sustainable Use
1,689,993
6
UMBU - CARIRI PB
Sustainable Use
111,384
29
UMBU - PE
Sustainable Use
1,407,537
4
Table 11.10.5 – List of Conservation Targets and Goals for the Atlantic Forest Biome.
NAME
Acrobatornis fonsecai
TYPE
Aves
AREA (ha)
GOAL (%)
50
Alectrurus tricolor
Aves
50
Amazona brasiliensis
Aves
50
Amazona pretrei
Aves
50
Amazona rhodocorytha
Aves
75
Amazona vinacea
Aves
50
334
Anthus nattereri
Aves
Automolus leucophthalmus lammi
Aves
50
75
Biatas nigropectus
Aves
50
Calyptura cristata
Aves
100
Carduelis yarrellii
Aves
50
Carpornis melanocephalus
Aves
50
Caryothraustes canadensis frontalis
Aves
50
Celeus torquatus tinnunculus
Aves
50
Cercomacra laeta sabinoi
Aves
50
Cichlopsis leucogenys leucogenys
Aves
75
Claravis godefrida
Aves
100
Conopophaga lineata cearae
Aves
50
Conopophaga melanops nigrifrons
Aves
50
Cotinga maculata
Aves
75
Crax blumenbachii
Aves
75
Crypturellus noctivagus noctivagus
Aves
50
Culicivora caudacuta
Aves
50
Curaeus forbesi
Aves
50
Dendrocincla fuliginosa taunayi
Aves
75
Dendrocolaptes certhia medius
Aves
75
Dryocopus galeatus
Aves
50
Dysithamnus plumbeus
Aves
50
Formicivora erythronotos
Aves
75
Formicivora littoralis
Aves
100
Glaucis dohrnii
Aves
75
Grallaria varia intercedens
Aves
50
Harpyhaliaetus coronatus
Aves
50
Hemitriccus furcatus
Aves
50
Hemitriccus kaempferi
Aves
100
Hemitriccus mirandae
Aves
75
Herpsilochmus pectoralis
Aves
50
Herpsilochmus pileatus
Aves
50
Iodopleura pipra leucopygia
Aves
75
Leptodon forbesi
Aves
100
Leucopternis lacernulata
Aves
50
Limnoctites rectirostris
Aves
50
Mergus octosetaceus
Aves
100
Merulaxis stresemanni
Aves
100
Momotus momota marcgraviana
Aves
75
Myrmeciza ruficauda
Aves
75
Myrmotherula fluminensis
Aves
100
Myrmotherula minor
Aves
50
Myrmotherula snowi
Aves
100
Myrmotherula urosticta
Aves
50
Nemosia rourei
Aves
100
Neomorphus geoffroyi dulcis
Aves
100
Neopelma aurifrons
Aves
50
Numenius borealis
Aves
100
Odontophorus capueira plumbeicollis
Aves
50
Onychorhynchus swainsoni
Aves
75
Oryzoborus maximiliani
Aves
100
Penelope superciliaris alagoensis
Aves
75
335
Phaethornis margarettae
Aves
75
Phaethornis ochraceiventris camargoi
Aves
50
Philydor novaesi
Aves
100
Phylloscartes beckeri
Aves
75
Phylloscartes ceciliae
Aves
75
Phylloscartes kronei
Aves
50
Piculus chrysochloros polyzonus
Aves
50
Picumnus exilis pernambucensis
Aves
50
Pipile jacutinga
Aves
75
Piprites pileatus
Aves
50
Platyrinchus leucoryphus
Aves
50
Platyrinchus mystaceus niveigularis
Aves
50
Popelaria langsdorffi langsdorffi
Aves
50
Procnias averano averano
Aves
50
Procnias nudicollis
Aves
50
Pyriglena atra
Aves
75
Pyriglena leuconota pernambucensis
Aves
50
Pyrrhura anaca
Aves
50
Pyrrhura cruentata
Aves
50
Pyrrhura leucotis
Aves
50
Rhopornis ardesiaca
Aves
75
Schiffornis turdinus intermedius
Aves
50
Sclerurus caudacutus caligineus
Aves
75
Sclerurus caudacutus umbretta
Aves
75
Sclerurus scansor cearensis
Aves
50
Scytalopus iraiensis
Aves
75
Scytalopus psychopompus
Aves
100
Sporophila cinnamomea
Aves
75
Sporophila falcirostris
Aves
50
Sporophila frontalis
Aves
50
Sporophila melanogaster
Aves
50
Stymphalornis acutirostris
Aves
75
Synallaxis cinerea
Aves
50
Synallaxis infuscata
Aves
75
Tangara cyanocephala corallina
Aves
50
Tangara fastuosa
Aves
50
Tangara peruviana
Aves
50
Terenura sicki
Aves
75
Thalurania watertonii
Aves
50
Thamnophilus aethiops distans
Thamnophilus caerulescens
pernambucensis
Thripophaga macroura
Aves
75
Aves
50
Aves
50
Tigrisoma fasciatum
Aves
75
Tijuca condita
Aves
50
Touit melanonota
Aves
50
Touit surda
Aves
50
Xanthopsar flavus
Aves
50
Xenops minutus alagoanus
Aves
50
Xipholena atropurpurea
Aves
75
Xiphorhynchus fuscus atlanticus
Aves
50
Xolmis dominicana
Holoaden bradei
Aves
50
Amphibia
100
336
Hyla cymbalum
Amphibia
100
Hylomantis granulosa
Amphibia
100
Melanophryniscus dorsalis
Amphibia
100
Melanophryniscus macrogranulosus
Amphibia
100
Paratelmatobius lutzii
Amphibia
100
Thoropa lutzi
Amphibia
100
Thoropa petropolitana
Amphibia
Mammalia
100
Abrawayaomys ruschii
Akodon mystax
Mammalia
50
Akodon paranaensis
Mammalia
50
Akodon sanctipaulensis
Mammalia
Alouatta belzebul
Mammalia
Alouatta guariba guariba
Mammalia
Bibimys labiosus
Mammalia
Brachyteles arachnoides
Mammalia
Brachyteles hypoxanthus
Mammalia
Bradypus torquatus
Mammalia
Brucepattersonius albinasus
Mammalia
50
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50
75% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
100% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50
Brucepattersonius griserufescens
Mammalia
50
Brucepattersonius igniventris
Mammalia
50
Brucepattersonius iheringi
Mammalia
50
Brucepattersonius soricinus
Mammalia
Callicebus barbarabrownae
Mammalia
Callicebus coimbrai
Mammalia
Callicebus melanochir
Mammalia
Callicebus personatus
Mammalia
Callistomys pictus
Mammalia
Callithrix aurita
Mammalia
50
100% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
100% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
75
337
distribution
Callithrix flaviceps
Mammalia
Callithrix geoffroyi
Mammalia
Callithrix kuhlii
Mammalia
Cavia intermedia
Mammalia
Cebus robustus
Mammalia
Cebus xanthosternos
Mammalia
Chaetomys subspinosus
Mammalia
75% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
100% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50
Chiroderma doriae
Mammalia
50
Ctenomys flamarioni
Mammalia
Cyclopes didactylus
Mammalia
Dasyprocta azarae
Mammalia
Histiotus alienus
Mammalia
50
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50
J. rimifrons
Mammalia
50
Lasiurus ebenus
Mammalia
Leontopithecus caissara
Mammalia
Leontopithecus chrysomelas
Mammalia
Leontopithecus chrysopygus
Mammalia
Leontopithecus rosalia
Mammalia
Leopardus tigrinus
Mammalia
Leopardus wiedii
Mammalia
50
100% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
75% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
100% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
75% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
338
Lonchophylla bokermanni
Mammalia
Marmosops paulensis
Mammalia
Mazama nana
Mammalia
Micronycteris pusilla
species geographical
distribution
50
Mammalia
50
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50
Monodelphis rubida
Mammalia
50
Monodelphis scalops
Mammalia
50
Monodelphis sorex
Mammalia
50
Monodelphis theresa
Mammalia
50
Monodelphis unistriata
Mammalia
50
Myotis ruber
Mammalia
Myrmecophaga tridactyla
Mammalia
Oxymycterus angularis
Mammalia
50
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50
Oxymycterus caparaoe
Mammalia
50
Oxymycterus judex
Mammalia
50
Oxymycterus rostellatus
Mammalia
Panthera onca
Mammalia
Pecari tajacu
Mammalia
Phaenomys ferrugineus
Mammalia
50
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
10,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50
Phyllomys brasiliensis
Mammalia
75
Phyllomys dasythrix
Mammalia
50
Phyllomys kerri
Mammalia
50
Phyllomys lundi
Mammalia
100
Phyllomys mantiqueirensis
Mammalia
50
Phyllomys thomasi
Mammalia
75
Phyllomys unicolor
Mammalia
100
Platyrrhinus recifinus
Mammalia
Potos flavus
Mammalia
Priodontes maximus
Mammalia
Pteronura brasiliensis
Mammalia
50
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
10,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
100
Puma concolor capricornensis
Mammalia
50
Rhagomys rufescens
Mammalia
50
Speothos venaticus
Mammalia
Tapirus terrestris
Mammalia
50
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
10,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
339
Tayassu pecari
Mammalia
Trinomys dimidiatus
Mammalia
50% of the habitat
remnants larger than
1,000 ha within the
species geographical
distribution
50
Trinomys eliasi
Mammalia
50
Trinomys gratiosus
Mammalia
50
Trinomys iheringi
Mammalia
50
Trinomys mirapitanga
Mammalia
50
Trinomys paratus
Mammalia
50
Trinomys. moojeni
Mammalia
50
Wilfredomys oenax
Mammalia
100
Anisolepis undulatus
Reptilia
40
Bothrops alcatraz
Reptilia
100
Bothrops insularis
Reptilia
100
Bothrops pirajai
Reptilia
40
Cnemidophorus abaetensis
Reptilia
40
Cnemidophorus littoralis
Reptilia
100
Cnemidophorus nativo
Reptilia
30
Cnemidophorus vacariensis
Reptilia
100
Corallus cropanii
Reptilia
100
Dipsas albifrons cavalheiroi
Reptilia
100
Heterodactylus lundii
Reptilia
100
Liolaemus lutzae
Reptilia
75
Liolaemus occipitalis
Reptilia
40
Phrynops hoge
Reptilia
100
Placosoma cipoense
Reptilia
40
Table 11.10.6 – List of Conservation Targets and Goals for the Pampas Biome.
Aegla obstipa
NAME
TYPE
Species
AREA (ha)
GOAL (%)
40
Aegla violacea
Species
40
Agelaius cyanopus
Species
60
Alouatta caraya
Species
40
Alouatta guariba clamitans
Species
40
Amazona pretrei
Species
40
Anheteromeyenia ornata
Species
60
Anodontites ensiformis
Species
40
Anodontites ferrarisi
Species
40
Anodontites iheringi
Species
40
Anodontites trigonus
Species
40
Anthus nattereri
Species
40
Arhysosage cactorum
Species
40
Asthenes baeri
Species
40
Bicolletes franki
Species
60
Bicolletes pampeana
Species
60
Blastocerus dichotomus
Species
80
Buserallus nigricollis
Species
40
Cairina moschata
Species
60
Calamodontophis paucidens
Species
40
Caluromys lanatus
Species
40
Ceratophrys ornata
Species
40
Chrysocyon brachyurus
Species
80
340
Circus cinereus
Species
40
Cistothorus platensis
Species
60
Cnemotriccus fuscatus fusca
Species
40
Crotophaga major
Species
40
Ctenomys flamarioni
Species
40
Culicivora caudacuta
Species
80
Dasyprocta azarae
Species
40
Drulia browni
Species
40
Dryocopus lineatus
Species
40
Eira barbara
Species
40
Eleothreptus anomalus
Species
60
Euphonia violacea
Species
40
Gallinago undulata
Species
40
Geranoaetus melanoleucus
Species
40
Gubernatrix cristata
Species
60
Herpailurus yaguarondi
Species
40
Herpetotheres cachinnans
Species
40
Heteroxolmis dominicana
Species
40
Larus atlanticus
Species
40
Leopardus pardalis
Species
40
Leopardus tigrinus
Species
40
Leopardus wiedii
Species
40
Leptodactylus chaquensis
Species
40
Leptodactylus podicipinus
Species
40
Limnoctites rectirostris
Species
40
Liolaemus occipitalis
Species
40
Lontra longicaudis
Species
40
Mazama americana
Species
60
Mazama guazoupira
Species
40
Melanophryniscus atroluteus
Species
80
Melanophryniscus dorsalis
Species
40
Melanophryniscus montevidensis
Species
80
Mesembrinibis cayennensis
Species
60
Myotis ruber
Species
40
Nasua nasua
Species
40
Oncifelis colocolo
Species
60
Oncifelis geoffroyi
Species
40
Oryzoborus Angolensis
Species
60
Ozotocerus bezoarticus
Species
80
Parabuteo unicinctus
Species
60
Parastacus brasiliensis
Species
40
Picoides mixtus
Species
80
Plebeia wittmanni
Species
60
Porzana spiloptera
Species
60
Puma concolor
Species
60
Ramphastos toco
Species
40
Rectartemon depressus
Species
40
Sacoramphus papa
Species
80
Saltator fuliginosus
Species
40
Sarkidiornis melanotus
Species
40
Schematiza aneurica
Species
40
Spartonoica maluroides
Species
40
341
Sporophila cinnamomea
Species
60
Sporophila collaris
Species
40
Sporophila hypoxantha
Species
80
Sporophila palustris
Species
60
Synallaxis albescens
Species
40
Tamandua tetradactyla
Species
40
Tryngites subruficollis
Species
40
Xanthopsar flavus
Species
40
Bacia do Rio Ibirapuitã
Phytogeographical Unit
70
Bacia do Rio Ibirapuitã
Phytogeographical Unit
50
Butiazais de Tapes
Phytogeographical Unit
70
Campanha
Phytogeographical Unit
30
Campanha
Phytogeographical Unit
30
Campos das Missões
Phytogeographical Unit
70
Campos das Missões
Phytogeographical Unit
50
Campos de Jaguarão e Arroio Grande
Phytogeographical Unit
50
Coxilha da Cruz
Phytogeographical Unit
70
Coxilha das Lombas
Phytogeographical Unit
30
Coxilha Pedras Altas
Phytogeographical Unit
70
Depressão do Rio Jacuí Meridional
Phytogeographical Unit
30
Depressão do Rio Jacuí Setentrional
Phytogeographical Unit
50
Depressão do Rio Jacuí Setentrional
Phytogeographical Unit
30
Depressão Periférica
Phytogeographical Unit
50
Depressão Periférica
Phytogeographical Unit
70
Dunas Litorâneas
Phytogeographical Unit
70
Dunas Litorâneas
Phytogeographical Unit
70
Dunas Litorâneas
Phytogeographical Unit
30
Escudo Meridional
Phytogeographical Unit
30
Escudo Ocidental
Phytogeographical Unit
30
Escudo Setentrional
Phytogeographical Unit
30
Planície da Lagoa Mirim
Phytogeographical Unit
70
Planície da Lagoa Mirim
Phytogeographical Unit
30
Planície da Laguna dos Patos
Phytogeographical Unit
30
Planície da Laguna dos Patos
Phytogeographical Unit
70
Planície do Alto Jaguarão
Phytogeographical Unit
50
Região de Parque Espinilho
Phytogeographical Unit
70
Região de Parque Espinilho
Phytogeographical Unit
30
Serras do Herval e dos Tapes
Phytogeographical Unit
30
Table 11.10.7 – List of Conservation Targets and Goals for the Coastal and Marine Zone.
NAME
Banco de Fanerógamas Emersas
TYPE
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
AREA (ha)
GOAL (%)
Banco de Macroalgas
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
70
Complexo de restinga
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
30
Costões rochosos
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
30
Delta de Maré
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
50
Dunas
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
50
Estuários
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
70
Falésias
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
30
Foz do Rio São Francisco
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
70
Ilhas Costeiras
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
70
Lagoas Costeiras
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
50
30
342
Lagunas (alagamar)
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
70
Manguezais - RN e CE
Manguezais (Bosques + apicuns) - PB e Sul
a Bahia
Planicie entre Mares
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
100
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
70
Pradarias Submersas de Fanerógamas
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
50
Praias Arenosas
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
50
Tabuleiros litorâneos
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
30
40
Banco de Fanerógamas Marinhas
Coastal Target – Northeast Region
Coastal Target – North Region
100
Brejos herbáceos salinos (marismas)
Coastal Target – North Region
40
Campos Litorâneos de água doce
Coastal Target – North Region
40
Complexos estuarinos maranhenses e
paraenses (incluindo baías)
Coastal Target – North Region
70
Delta do Parnaíba
Coastal Target – North Region
100
Dunas
Coastal Target – North Region
40
Estuários Piauienses
Coastal Target – North Region
70
Foz do Amazonas
Coastal Target – North Region
70
Golfão Maranhense
Coastal Target – North Region
40
Ilha Costeira
Coastal Target – North Region
40
Lagoas Costeiras
Coastal Target – North Region
40
Manguezais amazônicos
Coastal Target – North Region
100
Planícies de Marés
Coastal Target – North Region
40
Praias Arenosas
Coastal Target – North Region
40
Restingas
Coastal Target – North Region
70
Várzeas Estuarinas
Coastal Target – North Region
40
Bancos de macroalgas
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
100
Butiazais
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
70
Canais de marés (Gamboas)
Costões Rochosos (inclui comunidades
coralinas)
Dunas
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
50
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
70
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
50
Estuários
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
50
Falésias
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
30
Fundo de algas calcárias
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
50
Ilhas Costeiras (Rochosas)
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
70
Lagoas costeiras
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
70
Lagunas
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
70
Manguezais
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
100
Marismas
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
50
Planícies entremarés
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
70
Pradarias de Fanerógamas Marinhas
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
70
Praias
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
50
Restinga
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
50
Tabuleiros
Coastal Target – Southeast/South Region
30
Atol das Rocas
Marine Target – Northeast Region
100
Banco de esponjas
Marine Target – Northeast Region
70
Canions e leques aluvionais
Marine Target – Northeast Region
100
Dunas Submersas
Marine Target – Northeast Region
50
Fundo de Algas Calcáreas
Marine Target – Northeast Region
100
Fundos Arenosos
Marine Target – Northeast Region
70
Fundos Lamosos
Marine Target – Northeast Region
30
Ilha Oceänica incluindo Abrolhos
Marine Target – Northeast Region
100
Manguezal de ilha oceânica
Marine Target – Northeast Region
30
343
Montes Submarinos
Marine Target – Northeast Region
Paleocanais de plataforma
Marine Target – Northeast Region
100
70
Recifes de plataforma (águas rasas)
Recifes profundos além do talude (da
plataforma)
Talude
Marine Target – Northeast Region
100
Marine Target – Northeast Region
70
Marine Target – Northeast Region
100
Bancos Lamosos Submersos
Marine Target – North Region
40
Cone do Amazonas
Marine Target – North Region
40
Fundos Arenosos
Marine Target – North Region
40
Fundos de algas calcárias
Marine Target – North Region
40
Fundos Duros consolidados/Carbonáticos
Marine Target – North Region
40
Ilha Rochosa
Marine Target – North Region
40
Lixeira
Marine Target – North Region
70
Montes Submarinos
Marine Target – North Region
40
Recife de Coral
Marine Target – North Region
70
Talude
Marine Target – North Region
40
Área de ressurgência (Cabo Frio) e
Ecótone Cabo Frio
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
30
Área de ressurgência (Santa Marta) e
Ecótone Cabo de Santa Marta
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
30
Banco de Abrolhos
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
100
Bancos de laminária (40-120m de
profundidade)
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
50
Bancos Oceânicos
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
70
Canions e leques aluvionais do talude
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
30
Ilhas Oceânicas (bacia oceânica)
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
50
Montes submarinos
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
50
Plataforma 50 - 200 m
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
100
Plataforma interna 0 - 50 m de
profundidade
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
30
Recifes Profundos
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
70
Sublitoral não consolidado até 50m de
profundidade
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
30
Sublitoral não consolidado de 50m de
profundidade até quebra do talude
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
70
Talude até 1000 metros
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
30
Vórtice de Vitória
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
30
ZEE (profundidade > 1000m)
Oceanic Target – Southeast/South Region
30
Coryphaspiza melanotis (ave)
Species – North Region
70
Ginglymostoma cirratum (peixe)
Species – North Region
70
Gramma brasiliensis (peixe)
Species – North Region
70
Guaruba guarouba (ave)
Species – North Region
70
Isogomphodon oxyrhinchus (peixe)
Species – North Region
70
344
Macrobrachium carcinus (crustáceo)
Species – North Region
70
Phlegopsis nigromaculata paraensis (ave)
Species – North Region
70
Pristis pectinata (peixe)
Species – North Region
70
Pristis perotteti (peixe)
Species – North Region
70
Pteroglossus bitorquatus bitorquatus (ave)
Species – North Region
70
Scarus guacamaia (peixe)
Species – North Region
70
Thalasseus maximus (ave)
Species – North Region
70
Trichechus inunguis (mamífero)
Species – North Region
70
Trichechus manatus (mamífero)
Species – North Region
70
Asterina stellifera
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Astropecten brasiliensis
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Astropecten cingulatus
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Astropecten marginatus
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Atta robusta
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Balaenoptera borealis (área de distribuição)
Balaenoptera borealis (area preterita de
caça)
Balaenoptera musculus (área de ocorrência
potencial)
Balaenoptera physalus
Caretta caretta (alimentação migração
repouso)
Caretta caretta (principais áreas desova)
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Cetorhinus maximus
Chelonia mydas (maior concentração de
registros)
Condylactis gigantea
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Coscinasterias tenuispina
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Ctenomys flamarioni
Dermochelys coriacea (alimentação
migração e repouso)
Dermochelys coriacea (principal área de
desova)
Dinoponera lucida
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Diomedea dabbenena
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Diomedea epomophora
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Diomedea exulans
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Diomedea sanfordi
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Diopatra cuprea
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Diplodon iheringi
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Echinaster (othilia) brasiliensis
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Echinaster (othilia) echinophorus
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Echinaster (othilia) guyanensis
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Elacatinus figaro
Eretmochelys imbricata (alimentação
migração e repouso)
Eubalaena australis
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Eucidaris tribuloides
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Eunice sebastiani
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Eurythoe complanata
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Galeorhinus galeus
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Ginglymostoma cirratum
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Gonyostomus henseli
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Gramma brasiliensis
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Isostichopus badionotus
Lepidochelys olivacea (alimentação
migração e repouso)
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
345
Lepidochelys olivacea (área de desova
esporádica)
Linckia guildingii
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Luidia clathrata
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Luidia ludwigi
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Luidia senegalensis
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Mazama nana
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Mecistogaster pronoti
Megaptera novaeangliae (concentração
reprodutiva)
Megaptera novaeangliae (ocorrência
eventual)
Megaptera novaeangliae (ocorrência
tradicional)
Millepora alcicornis
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Mustelus schmitti
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Narcissia trigonaria
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Negaprion brevirostris
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Oreaster reticulatus
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Paracentrotus gaimardi
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Parides ascanius
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Phrynops hogei
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Pontoporia blainvillei
Procellaria aequinoctialis (área de
ocorrência)
Procellaria conspicillata
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Pterodroma incerta
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Rhincodon typus
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Rhinobatos horkelii
Scarus guacamaia (área de ocorrência
preterita)
Speothos venaticus
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Squatina guggenheim
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Squatina occulta
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Thalassarche chlororhynchos
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Thalassarche melanophris
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Thalasseus maximus (área de ocorrência)
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
Thalasseus maximus (área de reprodução)
Species – Southeast/South Region
50
346
Secretary of
Biodiversity and Forests
Ministry of
the Environment