ERRATA
1.
Na página ii, onde se lê “em macacos rhesus”, dever-se-á ler “macacos rabo-de-porco”;
2.
Na página iii, onde se lê “comportamentos Raiva (Anger), Medo (Fear) e Stress Social
(Social Distress) seriam comportamentos trigger”, dever-se-á ler “comportamentos Raiva
(Anger), Medo (Fear), Aflição (Social Distress) e Excitação (Excitação) seriam
comportamentos trigger”;
3.
Sempre que se leia “Stress Social” (págs. iii, iv), dever-se-á ler “Aflição”;
4.
Na página iv, onde se lê “Imitação a Excitação”, dever-se-á ler “Excitação a Excitação”;
5.
Na página v, onde se lê “prentende-se”, dever-se-á ler “pretende-se”;
6.
Na página 1, onde se lê “...being the fittest is can also be synonym...”, dever-se-á ler
“...being the fittest can also be synonym...”;
7.
Na página 8, onde se lê “...with reassuring behaviour in (Preston and de Waal 2001; Koski
et al. 2007)”, dever-se-á ler “with reassuring behaviour (Preston and de Waal 2001; Koski
et al. 2007)”;
8.
Na página 31, onde se lê “by factors such as kin, proximity, social closeness or positive
experience”, dever-se-á ler “by factors such as kin, similarity, social closeness or positive
experience”;
9.
Na página 31, onde se lê “Accordingly, we expected Fear to anger, Fear to Social
Helplessness, Consolation to Fear and Consolation to Helplessness to be the appropriate
complementary responses…”, dever-se-á ler “Accordingly, we expected Fear to Anger,
Consolation to Fear and Consolation to Helplessness to be the appropriate complementary
responses…”;
10. Na página 36, após a frase “In the case of Anger, imitation was considered only in the
cases where the imitating individual was not the target of the aggression.“ dever-se-á ler
“Imitation was considered an empty behaviour, i.e., a behaviour with no specific target and
commonly without the replication of the full observed emotion”;
11. Na página 36, deverá ignorar-se a frase “Consolation can also be given upon request,
otherwise quoted Rescue as Consolation.”;
12. Na página 39, onde se lê a frase “A total of 142 triggers and 609 emotional responses for
the juvenile group, and 36 triggers and 88 emotional responses for the adult group were
recorded”, dever-se-á ler “A total of 145 triggers and 1092 emotional responses for the
juvenile group, and 59 triggers and 299 emotional responses for the adult group were
recorded”;
13. Na página 39, onde se lê a tabela 7:
Response
Trigger
Anger
Social Helplessness
Fear
Consolation
0
46
42
Fear
34
0
0
Imitation
25
0
0
Non-Responsive
462
0
0
dever-se-á ler a tabela 7:
Anger Consolation
Trigger
Response
Social
Fear
Helplessness
1
34
Anger
9
2
Social
Helplessness
Fear
4
46
0
0
42
0
Imitation Non-Responsive
Other
25
462
1
4
6
267
1
0
0
188
0
14. Na página 40,onde se lê a tabela 8:
Response
Trigger
Anger
1
0
0
Anger
Social Helplessness
Excitement
Consolation
0
7
0
Fear
1
0
0
Imitation
0
0
72
Rescue
0
7
0
dever-se-á ler a tabela 8:
Trigger
Response
Social
Fear Imitation Rescue
Helplessness
0
1
0
0
Non-Responsive
Anger
Consolation
Anger
1
0
Social
Helplessness
Excitement
0
7
0
0
0
7
42
0
1
1
2
73
0
152
Fear
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
4
15. Na página 40, onde se lê “...juvenile group (χ2(6) = 609,000; N=609; p=0), and in the adult
group (χ2(6) = 176,000; N=88; p=0)”, dever-se-á ler “juvenile group (χ2
1092; p<.001), and in the adult group (χ
2
(18)=
(12)=
142,468; N= 299; p<.001);
16. Na página 40, onde se lê a tabela 9:
Trigger
Response
Adjusted residuals
Anger
Anger
Anger
Social Helplessness
Fear
Fear
Imitation
Non-Responsive
Consolation
Consolation
2,466247
2,09431
17,98016
17,1637
16,34253
Trigger
Response
Adjusted residuals
Anger
Anger
Anger
Social Helplessness
Fear
Imitation
Non-Responsive
Consolation
5,1
dever-se-á ler a tabela 9:
3,6
2,2
4,6
127,507; N=
Fear
Consolation
6,2
Trigger
Response
Adjusted residuals
Social Helplessness
Social Helplessness
Excitement
Consolation
Rescue
Imitation
6,340152
6,340152
9,380832
Trigger
Response
Adjusted residuals
Social Helplessness
Social Helplessness
Excitement
Consolation
Rescue
Excitement
4,6
5,6
5,4
17. Na página 40, onde se lê a tabela 10:
dever-se-á ler a tabela 10:
18. Na página 40, onde se lê “Relationship Quality plays little of no effect at all in the display
of emotional responses to the empathic triggers; only one relationship was considered
significant in the juvenile group – between the dyad Zac-Cozy (adjusted residual
=4,963893) (χ2(81)=118,183; N= 609; p<0,005), which presents an RQ index of zero. Also,
only one relationship could have been considered significant in the adult group – in the
dyad Nikki-Amadeus (adjusted residual = 3,308364) but this association is dismissed as the
overall performer x witness association was rendered non-significant (χ2(30)= 36,359; N=
88; NS)”,
dever-se-á ler:
“Relationship Quality plays little of no effect at all in the display of emotional responses
to the empathic triggers; only two relationships were considered significant in the juvenile
group – between the dyad Zac-Cozy (adjusted residual =2,0), which presents an RQ index
of zero, and between the dyad Zee-Cozy (adjusted residual =2,1) which presents an RQ
index of 0,05 (χ2(81)=136,13; N= 1092; p<.001). Also, only one relationship could have been
considered significant in the adult group – in the dyad Nikki-Amadeus (adjusted residual =
2,3) but this association is dismissed as the overall performer x witness association was
rendered non-significant (χ2(30)= 48,148; N= 299; NS);
19. Na página 41, onde se lê a tabela 11:
Trigger
Response
Strenght of trigger
Count of Closest
Not Closest
Anger
Anger
Anger
Social Helplessness
Fear
Fear
Imitation
Non-Responsive
Consolation
Consolation
11,32%
11,32%
100%
100%
20
1
0
29
28
14
24
462
17
14
dever-se-á ler a tabela 11:
Trigger
Response
Count of Closest
Not Closest
Anger
Anger
Anger
Social Helplessness
Fear
Fear
Imitation
Non-Responsive
Consolation
Consolation
20
1
0
29
28
14
24
462
17
14
20. Na página 41, onde se lê “Table 12. Counts of proximity for the emotional responses in the
juvenile group”, dever-se-á ler “Table 12. Counts of proximity for the emotional responses
in the adult group”;
21. Na página 41, onde se lê a tabela 12:
Trigger
Response
Strenght of trigger
Count of Closest
Not Closest
Social Helplessness
Social Helplessness
Excitement
Consolation
Rescue
Imitation
100%
100%
100%
2
0
8
5
7
64
dever-se-á ler a tabela 12:
Trigger
Response
Count of Closest
Not Closest
Social Helplessness
Social Helplessness
Excitement
Consolation
Rescue
Excitement
2
0
8
5
7
64
22. Na página 44, onde se lê “Finally, Imitation to Excitement is also in accordance...” deverse-á ler “Finally, Excitement to Excitement”.
23. Na página 44, onde se lê “Regarding Relationship Quality, only one relationship was
rendered significant in the juvenile group, between Zac and Cozy”, dever-se-á ler
“Regarding Relationship Quality, only two relationships were rendered significant in the
juvenile group, between Zac and Cozy and Zee and Cozy”.